David Pekarek Krohn and Danielle Grant-Keane of Perkins Coie LLP discuss “The Coming Wave – Preparing for the Rise of Patent Litigation in the Augmented and Virtual Reality Sector”. (Length:27:28) Download MP3

Johannes Hsu of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP in Irvine, California discusses the Tabaian v. Intel Corp. decision and his paper “Disqualifying an Expert: When is an Expert’s Prior Relationship Prejudicial to the Opposing Party?” (Length:10:20) Download MP3

Dr. Sarah Kagan of Banner & Witcoff in Washington D.C. discusses “Patent Wars: Genome Editing” and the latest developments in the CRISPR patent wars: U Cal v. Broad. (Length: 19:55) Download MP3

Eric Ball and Athul Acharya of Fenwick & West discuss their article “Honey Badger Don’t Care, but the Lanham Act Might” regarding Gordon v. Drape Creative and trademarks vs freedom of speech. (Length: 13:21) Download MP3

Christopher Loh of Fitzpatrick Cella Harper & Scinto in New York City discusses the Amgen v. Sanofi CAFC decision and his paper “End of ‘well characterized antigen’ test?” (Length: 20:08) Download MP3

Linda Wadler and Alissa Lipton of Finnegan discuss the SCOTUS decision in WesternGeco v. Ion Geophysical regarding recovering foreign lost profits damages for patent infringement. Their case comment. (Length: 21:06) Download MP3

Don Cameron of Bereskin & Parr LLP and Jerry Chen of JZC Intellectual Property Law discuss their involvement as counsel in Canada’s first electronic patent trial. (Length: 24:40) Download MP3

Prof. Ben Alarie of BlueJ Legal on “Using Machine Learning to Predict Legal Outcomes”. (Length: 43:19) Download MP3

Micheline Gravelle, Don MacOdrum, Mike Fenwick and Don Cameron of Bereskin & Parr LLP discuss “The Promise of the Patent” and the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Astrazeneca (Length: 55:16) Download MP3

John Crittenden of Cooley discusses reverse confusion of trademarks in “Squirrels Armed with Bazookas”. (Length: 28:29) Download MP3

Prof. Christopher Robertson of the University of Arizona on blinding expert witnesses to reduce bias: Bias in Litigation Science and Blind Expertise. (Length: 21:25) Download MP3

Jeanne M. Gills of Foley & Lardner LLP in Chicago discusses “What’s Reasonable? Protecting And Enforcing Trade Secrets” (article, slides). (Length: 39:22) Download MP3

Philip Petti of USG Corporation in Chicago discusses “Protecting Trade Secrets” Download MP3

Philip Harrison of Venner Shipley discusses the “Patentability of Computer Implemented Inventions in Europe” Download MP3

Marco Quina of Foley Hoag discusses Kimble v Marvel and “How Not to Get Snared in Brulotte’s Web” (Length: 29:50) Download MP3

Bruce Sunstein of Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP discusses Patent Strategies for Getting a Software Patent Invention Through the Alice Thicket. (Sunstein Law Review article on Alice) (Length: 33:23) Download MP3

William Jay of Goodwin Procter LLP discusses issue preclusion and the SCOTUS decision in B&B Hardware v. Hargis. (Length: 30:32) Download MP3

Elliot Cook of Finnegan Henderson discusses patent eligibility in the wake of Alice, Ultramercial and DDR. (Length: 22:49) Download MP3

Cynthia Rowden and Scott MacKendrick of Bereskin & Parr LLP in Toronto discuss “Canada Takes the Battle on Counterfeits to its Borders”. (Length: 21:05) Download MP3

Katharine Stephens of Bird & Bird, London, England, discusses Unitary Patents and the Unified Patent Court. (Length: 16:37) Download MP3

Mark Powell and Maria Holtmann of The Office for International Patent Cooperation, USPTO, Washington D.C., discuss “The Global Dossier Initiative”. (Video) (Length: 16:54) Download MP3

Cynthia Rowden and Scott MacKendrick of Bereskin & Parr LLP in Toronto describe “Big Changes to the Canadian Trade-marks Act – What You Need to Know, Now”. (Length: 57:38) Download MP3

Rob Reid, author of “Year Zero” discusses the absurdity of copyright law, aliens and treble damages. See also his Ted Talk on The $8 billion iPod and the ABA Landslide book review of Year Zero. (Length: 20:36) Download MP3

Mark Wine of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP in Irvine, California discusses “The Extraterritorial Reach of the ITC in SI Group v. Sino Legend”. See also Orrick’s quarterly report “The World in US Courts” and Trade Secrets Watch blog. (Length: … Continue reading →

Christopher Carani of McAndrews Held & Malloy Ltd in Chicago Illinois and DesignPatentAttorney.com on “Apple v. Samsung” (Length: 39:12) Download MP3

Selvyn Seidel of Fulbrook Capital Management in New York City on “Third Party Financing of Patent Litigation” (Length: 26:27) Download MP3

Belinda Scrimenti of Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard & Geraldson LLP in Chicago discusses her papers entitled “100 Years of Seeing RED – A Historical Perspective on the Second Circuit’s “Red-Sole Shoe” Mark Decision in Louboutin v. Yves Saint Laurent” and … Continue reading →

Donald M. Cameron of Bereskin & Parr LLP in Toronto Canada explains the Canadian Supreme Court decision in Teva v. Pfizer on the VIAGRA use patent. (Length: 12:39) Download MP3

Karen Canady of canady + lortz LLP in Los Angeles provides a patent attorney’s view of the basics of genes and the hotly-contested litigation over biotechnology patents. (Length: 11:12) Download MP3

Trevor Cook of Bird & Bird, London England discusses “English Patent Litigation – Under New Management” (Length: 17:53) Download MP3

James Gould, of Locke Lord LLP, New York City discusses “Comics and Copyright and a Super Legal Battle” (Length: 15:20) Download MP3

Cynthia Lopez Beverage of ST Ericsson in Santa Clara California discusses “Surviving in a Secondary Patent Marketplace”. (Length: 22:23) Download MP3

Robert Fischer of Fitzpatrick Cella Harper & Scinto in New York City discusses the history and recent cases involving patentable subject matter in the computer and business methods areas. (Length: 26:11) Download MP3

Gareth Morgan of Winston & Strawn LLP, London, England explains the Human Genome Sciences v. Eli Lilly decision of the UK Supreme Court and the meaning of “industrial applicability” for protein related inventions. (Length: 35:19) Download MP3

Bart Showalter of Baker Botts LLP in Dallas, Texas on “The Top US Patent Decisions of 2010-2011” and why these decisions were worthy of receiving a “Markey” award for their individual category. (Length: 34:12) Download MP3

Paul England of the London Office of Simmons & Simmons discusses “Cross-border Injunctions in Europe” (Length: 18:22) Download MP3

Thomas M. Williams of Howrey’s False Marking Task Force in Chicago, Illinois: “False Patent Marking and the Solo Cup Case”. Donald M. Cameron of Cameron MacKendrick LLP, Toronto, Canada: “The Amazon.com one-click Canadian Patent Decision” (Length: 14:24) Download MP3

Christopher Marchese of Fish & Richardson, San Diego, California: “Runaway Patent Damages Awards: Is Statutory Reform on the Way?” See also Chris’ Patent Damages blog, on Twitter (patentdamages), the F&R patent damages web page and Patent Damages Law and Practice … Continue reading →

DeAnn Smith of Foley Hoag LLP in Boston, Mass.: “Chemically Complicated: Effective Arguments to Combat “Obvious to Try” Rejections with respect to Takeda and the Chemical Arts“. (Length: 14:24) Download MP3

Frederick L. Whitmer of Kilpatrick Stockton LLP in New York City explains the Cybor Uncertainty Principle in “Claim Construction in Patent Law: A Question of Law?”. (Length: 30:37) Download MP3

Dale Lazar, of DLA Piper in Reston, Virginia discusses the Supreme Court of the United State’s Bilski decision on the patentability of business methods. (Length: 17:00) Download MP3

Jennifer Silverman of Ellenoff Grossman and Schole LLP in New York City discusses U.S. trademark dilution and the Dec. 3, 2009 decision in Starbucks vs. Wolfe’s Borough (Charbucks) lawsuit. (Length: 17:00) Download MP3

The New Jersey Patent Rules – one year later. Guests Stephen Roth of Lerner David Littenberg Krumholz and Mentlik, LLP in Westfield, New Jersey and Philip Johnson, Chief Intellectual Property Counsel at Johnson and Johnson in New Brunswick, New Jersey … Continue reading →

In Re Bose and Fraud on the US Trademarks Office regarding declarations of use. Guests: Jonathan Hudis of Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier and Neustadt, LLP and Kimberley Seluga of Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP Bose case comment. (Length: 16:54) … Continue reading →

Krista Schwartz of Jones Day on “Software and Scenes a Faire” in computer copyright cases and Charles Weiss of Kenyon and Kenyon on “Ariad: Federal Circuit to Consider Existence of Written Description Requirement”. (Length: 39:16) Download MP3

Niri Shanmuganathan of the London office of Taylor Wessing discusses Liability for User Generated Content on the Internet and Ed Reines of the Silicon Valley office of Weil, Gotshal and Manges LLP discusses Interlocutory Appeals of Claim Construction in the … Continue reading →

Chris Hansen of the ACLU in New York City and Warren Woessner of Schwegman Lundberg Woessner in Minneapolis discuss the Complaint filed by doctor and patient groups against the patents on the BRCA1 and BRCA2 cancer genes exclusively licensed to … Continue reading →

The Honourable Michael Black AC, the Chief Justice of the Federal Court of Australia, discusses the Fast Track Direction that affects trade-mark and copyright cases issued April 2009. It is part of an aggressive overhaul of the case management and … Continue reading →

The Right Honourable Sir Robin Jacob of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales discusses his submissions to the European Commission Pharma Sector Inquiry. Baila Celedonia of Cowan Liebowitz and Latman of New York City discusses Honda v. Winkelmann … Continue reading →

Rowan Freeland of Simmons and Simmons in London discusses the UK House of Lords decision in Lundbeck on sufficiency of disclosure in UK patents. See also his case comment. Robert Yoches of Finnegan in Washington, D.C. discusses US patent practice … Continue reading →