Let’s start with a question: Why is Real Property law a critical component of the Bar Exam? The simple answer is that Real Property touches on many aspects of our lives - from the ownership of our homes to the zoning laws that dictate what can be built in our neighborhoods. It’s a foundational area of law that every attorney should be familiar with, whether you specialize in real estate transactions or not. Now, to lay the groundwork, let’s clarify two terms you’ve probably heard a lot: Real Property and Personal Property. At its core, the distinction is quite straightforward. Real Property refers to land and anything attached to it. This can include buildings, trees, minerals, and even the rights associated with the land, like air rights. On the flip side, Personal Property is essentially everything else. It's the movable objects that you own. Your car, your laptop, your clothes - these are all examples of Personal Property. The key difference lies in mobility and permanence. Real Property stays put; Personal Property can move with you. Understanding the types of Real Property interests is crucial for navigating Real Property law. These interests determine what rights you have over a property. There are several types, but today we’ll focus on three main ones: Fee Simple Absolute, Life Estate, and Leasehold Interest. Fee Simple Absolute gives you the most complete ownership of property possible. You own the land and can do with it as you please, subject to laws and regulations, of course. It’s the most common form of property ownership and, unless specified otherwise, what people usually mean when they talk about owning property. Next, we have the Life Estate. This is a bit more specialized. A Life Estate gives someone the right to use and benefit from a property for the duration of their life. However, they can’t sell the property, and upon their death, it passes to another designated person, known as the remainderman. Lastly, there’s the Leasehold Interest, which you’re likely familiar with if you’ve ever rented an apartment. This gives you the right to use and occupy the property, but only for a predetermined period. Unlike Fee Simple Absolute, you don’t own the property; you just have a temporary right to use it. Along with understanding these interests, it’s important to get comfortable with key legal terminologies in Real Property law. Terms like "easement," which is the right to use someone else’s land for a specific purpose, or "encumbrance," which refers to a claim or liability attached to the property, like a mortgage or lien. These terms are the building blocks for more complex Real Property concepts we’ll cover in later episodes. So, why does all this matter for the Bar Exam? Well, these concepts form the basis of many Real Property questions you’ll encounter. Whether it’s a question about the rights of a property owner or the specifics of a lease agreement, having a solid grasp of these fundamentals will give you a strong foundation to build upon. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Criminal Liability Principles: Actus reus (physical act) and mens rea (mental state) are key in criminal cases. Actus reus includes deliberate actions or omissions violating legal duties. Mens rea involves evaluating the defendant's mental state during the offense, affecting blameworthiness. Categories of Crime: Offenses against persons (assault, battery) directly harm individuals and raise critical legal issues. Property crimes (theft, burglary) violate ownership rights and involve complex elements. Crimes against public order and morality challenge societal norms and require a nuanced legal approach. Defenses to Criminal Liability: Justifications (self-defense, necessity) consider exceptional circumstances where criminal acts are deemed legally permissible. Excuse defenses (insanity, intoxication) address conditions impairing the defendant's capacity to form mens rea. Procedure in Criminal Cases: Law enforcement investigates crimes, gathers evidence, and makes arrests. The judiciary oversees trials, ensuring fairness and protecting the accused's rights. Legal representation (defense attorneys, prosecutors) is crucial for navigating the complexities of criminal law. Sentencing and Punishment: Sentencing determines appropriate punishment based on the crime's severity and the defendant's criminal history. Sentencing guidelines promote consistency, and alternative sentences consider rehabilitation potential. Appeals and Post-Conviction Remedies: The appellate process allows for the review of trial court decisions to ensure fairness and uphold legal rights. Post-conviction remedies like habeas corpus petitions challenge the legality of detention, preventing wrongful convictions. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Key Rules and Their Application in Civil Litigation. Scope and Purpose: Ensure just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action. Summons: Formal commencement of a civil action; ensures proper notification of defendants. Pleading: Concise and direct pleadings for clarity and streamlined litigation. Defenses and Objections: Early dismissal of cases lacking legal basis. Discovery: Proportionality; mandatory disclosures for transparency and efficiency. Summary Judgment: Efficient resolution without trial when no genuine dispute of material fact. Rule Interpretation and Application. Interpretive Principles: Balance efficiency and substantive rights; Advisory Committee's Notes. Application in Various Contexts: Tailoring procedures to case specifics. Judicial Discretion: Managing cases, admissibility of evidence, and relevance of discovery. Evolving Interpretations: Adapting to new legal issues and technological changes. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Key Supreme Court Decisions Marbury v Madison (1803): Established judicial review to ensure laws comply with the Constitution. Brown v Board of Education (1954): Ruled "separate but equal" public schools unconstitutional, boosting the Civil Rights Movement. Miranda v Arizona (1966): Requires law enforcement to inform suspects of their rights before interrogation. Roe v Wade (1973): Upheld the right to an abortion, sparking ongoing debates about reproductive rights. Obergefell v Hodges (2015): Recognized the right to same-sex marriage nationwide, expanding civil liberties for LGBTQ+ individuals. Application of Principles Hypothetical scenarios illustrate how constitutional principles are applied in real-world contexts. Scenario 1: Banning political protests on public university campuses would likely be deemed unconstitutional as it restricts First Amendment rights. Scenario 2: A comprehensive knowledge test for voters could be challenged as discriminatory under the Equal Protection Clause and Voting Rights Act. Scenario 3: Searches without probable cause in high-crime neighborhoods would likely be found unconstitutional for violating the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizure. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Relevance Defined. First, what exactly is relevance? Evidence is relevant if it has any tendency to make a fact that is important to the case more or less probable than it would be without the evidence. In other words, for evidence to be relevant, it has to help prove or disprove a fact that matters to the ultimate issue in the case. The key question is always - does this evidence have any bearing on making any material fact more or less likely? If the answer is yes, the evidence meets the test for legal relevance. Determining Relevance. So how do courts determine if a particular piece of evidence is legally relevant to the case? Well, it’s important to keep in mind that the standard for relevance is very low. The evidence doesn’t have to definitively prove a fact - it just has to alter the probability for or against that fact even a little bit. Courts look at both the evidence itself and the issues in the case. They ask - does this evidence have any logical relationship or connection to the facts we need to prove here? For example, if the dispute is about whether a defendant was driving recklessly, a video showing the driver texting would be relevant because it makes reckless driving more probable. Excluding Irrelevant Evidence. Okay, so now we know how courts determine if evidence is relevant. But what happens if evidence is found to be irrelevant? The basic rule is that irrelevant evidence will be excluded from the case and the jury cannot hear it. This helps to avoid jury confusion and wasted time on facts that just aren’t important. There are a couple steps to objecting to evidence as irrelevant. First, the attorney makes an objection such as "Objection, irrelevant!" Then the judge will ask the attorney to explain why the evidence is irrelevant. The attorney needs to show how the evidence has no relationship or bearing on any material facts in the case. If the judge agrees, the evidence will be excluded and the jury will not get to consider it. Pretty simple right? --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Key Takeaways Constitutional Protections: The Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments provide critical protections against unreasonable searches and seizures, self-incrimination, and ensure the right to a fair trial. Legal Processes: We've navigated through the stages of criminal proceedings, from arrest to trial, including essential processes like arraignment, plea bargaining, and the significance of the jury selection process. Evolving Challenges: The course has also highlighted how technological advancements and societal changes continue to shape and challenge the application of criminal procedure principles, necessitating an adaptive legal system. Special Topics: Special attention to juvenile justice and the impact of digital evidence underscored the need for specialized knowledge and approaches within these unique areas. Guidance for Further Study For Bar Exam Preparation Focused Review: Concentrate on areas heavily tested on the bar exam, such as constitutional protections, rights of the accused, and key Supreme Court decisions that have shaped criminal procedure. Practice Questions: Regularly engage with multiple-choice questions and essay prompts from past bar exams to familiarize yourself with the exam format and refine your ability to apply legal principles under timed conditions. Study Groups: Join or form study groups to discuss and debate challenging concepts and hypothetical scenarios, enhancing your understanding through collaborative learning. Advanced Topics for Further Exploration Comparative Criminal Procedure: Investigate how other legal systems approach criminal justice, offering a broader perspective on the diversity of legal practices and philosophical underpinnings. Forensic Science in Criminal Law: Gain a deeper understanding of how forensic evidence is collected, analyzed, and presented in court, including the legal and ethical implications of forensic technologies. International Criminal Law: Explore the principles and practices of international criminal justice, including the role of international courts and the prosecution of crimes against humanity and genocide. Continuing Legal Education (CLE) and Specialization CLE Courses: Stay informed of the latest developments in criminal law and procedure through continuing legal education courses, which are essential for maintaining legal licensure and enhancing professional skills. Certification in Specialized Areas: Consider pursuing certification in specialized areas of criminal law, such as juvenile justice or cybercrime, to develop expertise that can enhance your legal practice. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

The Role of Police: Arrest, Search, and Seizure. Arrest Procedures: An arrest marks the beginning of formal legal proceedings against an individual. Police must have probable cause to believe a person has committed a crime. In many cases, an arrest warrant issued by a judge is required, although there are exceptions, such as when a crime is committed in an officer's presence. Search and Seizure: The Fourth Amendment protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures. Police generally need a warrant to conduct searches, but several exceptions exist, including consent searches, search incident to a lawful arrest, and exigent circumstances. The exclusionary rule prohibits evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment from being used in court. Miranda Rights: Upon arrest, individuals must be informed of their Miranda rights, which include the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney. Failure to provide these warnings can result in the suppression of any statements made by the defendant. The Criminal Trial Process. Arraignment: This is the defendant's first court appearance, where the charges are formally read, and the defendant enters a plea (guilty, not guilty, or no contest). Pre-Trial Motions: Before the trial, both sides may file motions to shape the proceedings, including motions to dismiss charges, suppress evidence, or determine the admissibility of certain facts. Trial: A criminal trial can be before a judge (bench trial) or a jury. The prosecution must prove the defendant's guilt "beyond a reasonable doubt," a high standard reflecting the serious implications of a criminal conviction. Opening Statements: Both sides present an overview of their case to the jury. Presentation of Evidence: The prosecution and defense present evidence and call witnesses. Cross-examination is used to challenge the evidence or testimony presented by the opposing side. Closing Arguments: Both sides summarize their case, attempting to persuade the jury of the defendant's guilt or innocence. Jury Deliberation and Verdict: The jury deliberates and then delivers a verdict. If the jury cannot reach a unanimous decision, a mistrial may be declared. Sentencing and Punishment. Following a conviction, the court will determine the appropriate sentence for the defendant. Sentencing can involve a range of penalties: Fines and Restitution: Financial penalties or orders to compensate victims. Probation: Allowing the offender to remain in the community under supervision instead of serving time in prison. Incarceration: Sentences to jail (short-term) or prison (long-term) depending on the severity of the crime. Death Penalty: In jurisdictions that allow it, the death penalty can be imposed for the most serious crimes. Sentencing Guidelines: Many jurisdictions have established guidelines to ensure consistent and fair sentencing practices, although judges often have discretion within these guidelines. Appeals and Post-Conviction Remedies Appeals: Defendants have the right to appeal their conviction or sentence if they believe there was a legal error in the trial process. Appellate courts review the record of the trial court proceedings but do not consider new evidence. Post-Conviction Remedies: Beyond appeals, defendants can seek other forms of relief, such as habeas corpus petitions, which challenge the lawfulness of the defendant's imprisonment. Expungement and Pardons: Under certain conditions, a defendant's criminal record can be expunged, effectively sealing it from public view. Pardons, granted by a governor or the president, forgive the convicted individual and may restore rights lost as a result of the conviction. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Significance and Rules of Class Actions. Purpose: Class actions allow individual plaintiffs with common claims to band together to sue a defendant. This is particularly useful when the cost of litigating individual claims would outweigh the individual damages, effectively providing a mechanism to pursue justice that might otherwise be economically unfeasible. Certification: For a lawsuit to proceed as a class action, the court must certify the class. Key criteria for certification include: Commonality: There must be questions of law or fact common to the class. Adequacy: The representative parties must fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class. Numerosity: The class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable. Typicality: The claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the claims or defenses of the class. Notice: Once a class is certified, members must be notified. This allows individuals the opportunity to opt out of the class action and pursue individual litigation if they so choose. Settlements: Class action settlements require court approval. This ensures that the settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate for all class members. Multi-District Litigation (MDL). MDL refers to a special legal procedure designed to speed the process of handling complex cases, such as air disaster litigation or complex product liability suits. It involves transferring all pending civil cases of a similar type filed in different federal districts to a single district to streamline pretrial proceedings. Understanding MDL. Consolidation for Pretrial Proceedings: The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, a group of federal judges, decides whether cases should be consolidated under MDL and which district court will oversee the proceedings. The aim is to avoid duplicate discovery, prevent inconsistent pretrial rulings, and conserve resources. Remand: After pretrial proceedings and discovery are complete, cases are typically remanded back to their original districts for trial. However, some cases may settle during the MDL process. Arbitration and Mediation. Arbitration and mediation are two principal forms of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), offering parties the chance to resolve disputes outside the traditional court system. Arbitration. Arbitration is a process where disputing parties agree to submit their conflict to one or more neutral third parties, known as arbitrators, making a binding decision. It is less formal than a trial and often faster. Binding Nature: Arbitration results in a binding decision, with limited opportunities for appeal. Selection of Arbitrators: Parties typically have a say in selecting the arbitrators, which allows for experts in the specific subject matter to preside over the dispute. Procedure: The arbitration process is governed by rules agreed upon by the parties or provided by an arbitration institution. These can be more flexible than court procedures. Mediation. Mediation involves a neutral third party, the mediator, who helps disputing parties find a mutually acceptable solution. Unlike arbitration, mediation does not result in a binding decision imposed by the mediator. Facilitative Role: The mediator facilitates dialogue, identifies issues, and helps explore solutions but does not make decisions for the parties. Confidentiality: Mediation sessions are private and confidential, encouraging open dialogue and negotiation. Voluntary and Non-binding: Parties retain control over the process and the outcome. They can withdraw at any time, and any settlement reached is by mutual consent. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Constitution, focusing on their profound impact on American society and law. The Reconstruction Amendments. 13th Amendment (Abolition of Slavery). Ratified in 1865, this amendment abolished slavery and involuntary servitude, except as punishment for a crime. It was a monumental step towards racial equality, directly addressing the institution of slavery that had divided the nation. Legal Impact: Beyond its immediate effect of emancipating slaves, the 13th Amendment has served as the foundation for later civil rights legislation and court decisions, including laws against peonage, forced labor, and human trafficking. 14th Amendment (Citizenship, Due Process, and Equal Protection) Ratified in 1868, it contains several key provisions: granting citizenship to all persons born or naturalized in the United States, including former slaves; requiring states to afford due process of law; and mandating equal protection under the laws. Legal Significance: This amendment fundamentally transformed the relationship between states and citizens, extending the protection of civil rights and liberties to the state level. It has been central to landmark Supreme Court decisions on segregation, abortion, marriage equality, and more. 15th Amendment (Voting Rights). Ratified in 1870, it prohibits the denial of the right to vote based on race, color, or previous condition of servitude, aiming to secure voting rights for African American men. Impact and Challenges: Despite its clear mandate, the enforcement of the 15th Amendment faced significant obstacles, including Jim Crow laws and other forms of voter suppression. It laid the groundwork for the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which aimed to overcome legal barriers at the state and local levels that prevented African Americans from exercising their right to vote as guaranteed under the 15th Amendment. Recent Amendments and Their Impact. 19th Amendment (Women's Suffrage). Ratified in 1920, this amendment granted women the right to vote, marking a pivotal moment in the women's rights movement. Impact: The 19th Amendment was the culmination of decades of activism and struggle, significantly expanding democracy in the United States. It has had a lasting effect on American politics and society, increasing gender equality in voting and beyond. 24th Amendment (Abolition of Poll Taxes). Ratified in 1964, it prohibited the use of poll taxes in federal elections, a practice that had been used to disenfranchise poor and minority voters. Significance: By eliminating a significant barrier to voting, the 24th Amendment furthered the democratic principle of universal suffrage, paving the way for greater voter participation across socioeconomic lines. 26th Amendment (Voting Age Lowered to 18). Ratified in 1971, in response to arguments that those old enough to be drafted for the Vietnam War should also have the right to vote. Impact: Lowering the voting age from 21 to 18 expanded the electorate and emphasized the importance of youth engagement in the political process. It reflected societal changes and acknowledged the capability of younger citizens to contribute meaningfully to democracy. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

I. Introduction to Evidence A. Purpose and Importance of Evidence Law. Evidence law serves a foundational role in the legal process, ensuring that trials are conducted fairly and that decisions are based on reliable, relevant information. Its primary purposes are: To Ascertain the Truth: Evidence law helps in uncovering the truth by allowing certain pieces of information to be presented in court while excluding others that are unreliable, irrelevant, or prejudicial. To Ensure Fairness: By providing clear rules for what evidence can be considered, evidence law aims to create a level playing field for all parties in a legal dispute. To Enhance Efficiency: Evidence rules streamline the legal process by preventing the introduction of evidence that would waste time or distract from the main issues of the case. To Protect Rights: Specific rules of evidence are designed to safeguard constitutional and statutory rights, such as the right against self-incrimination and the right to confront witnesses. B. Sources of Evidence Law Evidence law in the United States is primarily derived from two sources: Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE): The FRE governs proceedings in the federal courts and serves as a model for many states. They were enacted to bring uniformity to federal evidence law and are regularly updated to address new legal challenges, including those arising from technological advancements. State Evidence Codes: Each state has its own set of evidence rules, which may closely follow the FRE or diverge based on local legal traditions and needs. State supreme courts and legislatures are responsible for creating and modifying these rules. In addition to these codified rules, common law principles still influence evidence law, especially in areas not fully covered by the FRE or state codes. C. Types of Evidence. Evidence can be classified into several types, each with specific rules governing its use: Direct Evidence: Directly proves a fact without needing inference, such as eyewitness testimony that a person was seen at a crime scene. Circumstantial Evidence: Requires inference to connect it to a conclusion of fact. For example, finding a suspect's fingerprints at a crime scene does not directly prove they committed the crime but requires an inference. Real Evidence: Tangible items that are directly involved in the case at hand, such as a weapon used in a crime. Demonstrative Evidence: Evidence created for trial to demonstrate or illustrate a testimony or a fact, such as charts, maps, diagrams, and models. Digital Evidence: Information stored or transmitted in digital form that is relevant to the case. This includes emails, digital photographs, text messages, and information stored on electronic devices. D. Overview of the Admissibility of Evidence The admissibility of evidence is governed by a set of criteria designed to ensure that only relevant, reliable, and fair evidence is presented to the trier of fact (judge or jury). Key considerations include: Relevance: Evidence must be relevant to be admissible, meaning it must make a fact in question more or less probable than it would be without the evidence. Reliability: Certain types of evidence must meet specific reliability standards to be admissible, such as scientific evidence, which must be based on scientifically valid principles and methods. Prejudice vs. Probative Value: Even if evidence is relevant, it may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the risk of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury. Hearsay Rule: Hearsay, or statements made outside the courtroom offered for the truth of the matter asserted, is generally inadmissible unless it falls under one of the many exceptions to the hearsay rule. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Module 8: Review and Practice. Expanding upon the summary and key takeaways of major themes and concepts in criminal procedure, we delve into the intricacies of the legal safeguards and processes that underpin the justice system in the United States. This exploration not only consolidates our understanding of the course content but also underscores the fundamental principles that guide the application of criminal law. The Foundation of Criminal Procedure. At the heart of criminal procedure is the Constitution, which provides the bedrock for the legal protections afforded to individuals within the United States. The Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments collectively establish a framework that balances the state's interest in enforcing the law with the individual's right to be free from undue government interference. These amendments lay down the principles for lawful search and seizure, the right against self-incrimination, the right to due process, and the right to a fair trial, ensuring that the criminal justice system operates within the bounds of fairness and justice. Search and Seizure. The Fourth Amendment's prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures is central to the protection of individual privacy. This segment of the course illuminates the nuanced concept of a "reasonable expectation of privacy," which is pivotal in determining the legality of law enforcement actions. We dissect the warrant requirement, underscoring the necessity for law enforcement to obtain judicial approval before conducting most searches or seizures, thereby imposing a critical check on governmental power. Additionally, we examine the exceptions to this requirement, such as consent searches, exigent circumstances, and the plain view doctrine, which permit law enforcement to operate with flexibility under certain conditions. Miranda Rights and Custodial Interrogation. The landmark decision in Miranda v Arizona stands as a testament to the Fifth Amendment's protection against self-incrimination. This section elucidates the procedural safeguards required to protect individuals during custodial interrogation. The Miranda rights, including the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney, are not just procedural formalities but foundational elements that ensure fairness in the interrogation process and protect against coercive practices. Right to Counsel and Fair Trial. The Sixth Amendment's assurance of the right to counsel and a fair trial is a cornerstone of the criminal justice system, safeguarding the integrity of the legal process. We explore the critical aspects of this amendment, including the right to a speedy trial, the right to confront witnesses, and the right to be represented by an attorney. These rights collectively ensure that individuals are treated equitably within the justice system, with an opportunity to defend themselves against charges in a manner that respects their dignity and legal rights. Pretrial and Trial Procedures. The journey from arrest to trial encompasses a series of procedural steps designed to uphold the principles of justice and fairness. We navigate through the processes of arraignment, where charges are formally presented; bail and pretrial detention, which raise important questions about liberty and risk; plea bargaining, a critical component of the criminal justice system that resolves the majority of cases; and the trial process itself, including jury selection and the establishment of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Each stage is imbued with legal protections and ethical considerations, reflecting the complexity of balancing state interests and individual rights. Post-Conviction Remedies. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Crimes Against Public Order and Morality. Crimes against public order and morality encompass a broad category of offenses that, at their core, challenge the societal norms and regulations established to maintain a sense of general peace, decency, and good order within a community. These crimes can range from acts that disrupt public peace to behaviors deemed immoral or harmful to societal standards. Understanding these offenses requires not just a grasp of their legal definitions but an appreciation for their impact on communities and the legal system's role in balancing individual freedoms with public welfare. 1. Disorderly Conduct. Disorderly conduct is a catch-all term for a wide range of behaviors that disturb the public peace or decency, or that are intended to annoy or alarm the public. Given its broad scope, what constitutes disorderly conduct can vary significantly from one jurisdiction to another, but it generally includes acts like fighting, making unreasonable noise, disrupting lawful assemblies, obstructing traffic, and using offensive words or gestures that are likely to provoke a violent reaction. Legal Considerations: The broad nature of disorderly conduct statutes means that enforcement can be highly subjective, leading to criticisms regarding potential overuse or misuse, particularly in situations that might implicate free speech rights. Courts often look at the context of the behavior, including its location, audience, and any specific intent to cause public disruption. Impact on Society: While some view disorderly conduct laws as necessary to maintain public order, others argue they can be used to target certain groups or to suppress dissent. The challenge for the legal system is to enforce these laws in a manner that respects individual rights while protecting the community from genuine disturbances. 2. Drug Offenses. Drug offenses cover a range of activities prohibited by law, including the possession, distribution, manufacture, and trafficking of illegal drugs. These laws are intended to reduce the availability of illicit substances, decrease drug abuse, and limit the harm that drugs can cause to individuals and society. Categories of Drug Offenses: Drug laws differentiate among various types of offenses based on the action (e.g., possession vs. trafficking), the type of drug (with different schedules classifying drugs according to their perceived danger and potential for abuse), and the quantity involved. Penalties can range from minor fines for simple possession to lengthy prison sentences for large-scale manufacturing or distribution. Controversies and Reforms: The "War on Drugs" has led to significant debate over the effectiveness and fairness of drug laws, particularly those that impose harsh sentences for offenses involving minor quantities of drugs. Critics argue that these laws disproportionately affect certain communities and contribute to an overburdened criminal justice system. In response, there has been a movement toward reform, including drug decriminalization, legalization of cannabis in several states, and an emphasis on treatment over incarceration for nonviolent drug offenders. 3. Prostitution and Vice Crimes. Prostitution and related vice crimes involve sexual activities that are considered immoral or illegal, including soliciting, promoting, or engaging in prostitution. These laws reflect societal norms regarding sexuality, morality, and public decency, but they are also subject to significant debate over issues of personal autonomy, public health, and the role of the state in regulating private behavior. Legal Frameworks: Jurisdictions vary widely in their approach to prostitution and vice crimes. Some places criminalize activities related to prostitution, including soliciting and brothel-keeping, while others have legalized or decriminalized certain aspects of sex work under regulated conditions. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

The doctrines of Res Judicata and Collateral Estoppel play pivotal roles in the judiciary system, ensuring the finality of judgments and preventing the re-litigation of cases and issues that have already been decided. These principles are not only foundational for the efficient operation of courts but also protect against the injustice of subjecting parties to multiple lawsuits for the same cause. Res Judicata (Claim Preclusion). Res Judicata, also known as claim preclusion, refers to the legal doctrine which bars parties from re-litigating a case that has already been judged on its merits by a competent court. Its application is fundamental to the concept of judicial finality and serves to conserve judicial resources, respect court judgments, and protect litigants from the burden of multiple lawsuits. Core Elements of Res Judicata. Final Judgment on the Merits: For Res Judicata to apply, there must first be a final judgment on the merits of the case. Preliminary rulings or decisions that do not address the substantive issues of the case do not trigger Res Judicata. Same Parties or Their Privies: The doctrine applies to the parties involved in the original lawsuit or their legal successors. This element ensures that only those who were part of the initial judgment are bound by its results. Same Claim or Cause of Action: Res Judicata prevents the litigation of all claims that were brought or could have been brought in the initial lawsuit. This encompasses all rights to relief arising from the same transaction or occurrence, regardless of whether they were presented in the first case. The Effect of Claim Preclusion. When applied, Res Judicata renders a previous judgment absolute and conclusive on the parties involved, barring any future lawsuit on the same claim. This principle not only applies to the substantive issues that were actually decided but also to every other matter that the parties might have raised in the first action. Collateral Estoppel (Issue Preclusion). Collateral Estoppel, known as issue preclusion, prevents the re-litigation of factual or legal issues that were already decided in a previous lawsuit between the same parties. Unlike Res Judicata, which is concerned with claims, Collateral Estoppel focuses on issues. Key Requirements for Collateral Estoppel. Identical Issue: The issue sought to be precluded must be the same as the one involved in the prior action. This means the specific question or element must have been litigated and decided previously. Previously Adjudicated: The issue must have been actually litigated and determined in a prior lawsuit. This requires that the parties had a full and fair opportunity to argue the issue. Necessary to the Judgment: The determination of the issue must have been essential to the final judgment in the first action. If the issue was incidental or not determinative, Collateral Estoppel does not apply. Mutuality: Traditionally, issue preclusion required mutuality, meaning only parties to the previous lawsuit could use or be bound by the determination. However, many jurisdictions have moved towards a more flexible approach, allowing non-parties to benefit from issue preclusion under certain circumstances, such as in cases of non-mutual defensive Collateral Estoppel. Impact and Application. Collateral Estoppel serves to streamline litigation by eliminating the need to reprove facts or legal issues that have already been resolved. It enhances judicial efficiency and consistency by acknowledging the binding nature of prior adjudications on specific matters. Differences Between Res Judicata and Collateral Estoppel. While both doctrines aim to prevent redundant litigation, they operate on different levels. Res Judicata applies broadly to claims and causes of action, meaning it can preclude all claims arising from a particular transaction that were or could have been raised in the initial litigation. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

War Powers and National Security. Constitutional Framework The Constitution divides war powers between Congress and the President, creating a system of shared authority designed to prevent unilateral military action. Congress has the power to declare war, raise and support armies, provide and maintain a navy, and regulate the military. The President, as commander-in-chief, directs the military and conducts foreign affairs. Historical Context and Legal Debates. Throughout American history, these powers have led to significant legal and political debates, particularly regarding the scope of the President's authority to engage in military actions without explicit Congressional authorization. Conflicts like the Korean War, the Vietnam War, and more recent engagements in Afghanistan and Iraq have tested these constitutional boundaries. Key Cases and Doctrines. The Prize Cases (1863): The Supreme Court held that the President has the authority to act in the absence of Congressional declaration of war if the United States is already under attack or facing an imminent threat. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952): This case limited presidential power by ruling that President Truman could not seize steel mills during the Korean War without Congressional authorization. War Powers Resolution (1973): Passed in the aftermath of the Vietnam War, this act seeks to limit the President's ability to commit U.S. forces to armed conflict without Congress's consent. Its effectiveness and constitutionality, however, have been subjects of ongoing debate. Emergency Powers and Civil Liberties. Balancing Act. In times of crisis, such as war, natural disasters, or public health emergencies, the government often invokes emergency powers to address the situation. While these powers are necessary for effective response, they sometimes conflict with individual rights and civil liberties, requiring a delicate balance. Historical Examples. Civil War: President Abraham Lincoln's suspension of habeas corpus during the Civil War was a controversial exercise of emergency powers, later examined and circumscribed by the Supreme Court. World War II: The internment of Japanese Americans, authorized by Executive Order 9066, stands as a stark example of civil liberties being curtailed in the name of national security. Post-9/11: The USA PATRIOT Act and other measures enacted in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks raised significant concerns regarding surveillance, due process, and privacy. Judicial Oversight. The role of the judiciary in reviewing and sometimes curtailing the use of emergency powers is a critical aspect of maintaining the constitutional balance. Cases like Hamdi v. Rumsfeld (2004) and Boumediene v. Bush (2008) reflect the courts' ongoing engagement with these issues, emphasizing the need for due process and legal safeguards even in times of national emergency. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) represents a critical area of law that governs commercial transactions in the United States. Its influence extends across various aspects of commerce, particularly in the sale of goods. This module provides an in-depth exploration of the UCC, focusing on its scope, the formation of sales contracts, performance obligations, warranties, and remedies in sales contracts. This knowledge is vital for passing the bar exam and for practical legal application in commercial law. 1. Scope and Applicability of the UCC. Purpose: The UCC aims to harmonize the law of commercial transactions across all states, making commerce more predictable and efficient. Applicability: It primarily applies to transactions in goods, which are movable items at the time of the sale. Services, real estate, and intangible assets like stocks and bonds fall outside its purview. Goods vs. Services: The UCC applies when a transaction predominantly involves the sale of goods. In mixed contracts (goods and services), the UCC applies if the goods aspect is dominant, based on the "predominant factor test." 2. Formation of Sales Contracts under UCC. Flexibility in Formation: The UCC allows for greater flexibility in contract formation than common law. A valid contract can exist even without precisely matching offer and acceptance, and even if some terms are left open. The Battle of the Forms: Under UCC Section 2-207, when businesses exchange standardized forms (offer and acceptance) with differing terms, a contract is still formed. The UCC provides rules for which terms become part of the contract, aiming to respect the parties' intentions while minimizing disputes. 3. Performance Obligations in Sales. Delivery: The seller must make the goods available to the buyer as specified in the contract. If unspecified, delivery is at the seller's place of business. Risk of Loss: Determines who suffers the loss if goods are damaged or destroyed before delivery. The UCC specifies when risk of loss passes from the seller to the buyer, depending on the terms (e.g., FOB shipping point, FOB destination). Title Issues: Title passes when the parties intend it to pass, based on their agreement or, in absence of such, under UCC rules which often tie title passage to the delivery or transfer of possession. 4. Warranties under UCC. Express Warranties: Created by the seller’s affirmative statements, descriptions, or samples that the goods will meet certain standards. Implied Warranties: Automatically apply in most sales unless explicitly disclaimed. Warranty of Merchantability: Implies that goods are fit for their ordinary purpose and are of average, fair quality. Warranty of Fitness for a Particular Purpose: Applies when a seller knows the buyer’s specific intended use for the goods and the buyer relies on the seller's expertise to select suitable goods. 5. Remedies in Sales Contracts. Buyer's Remedies: Include the right to cover (obtain substitute goods), seek damages for non-delivery, reject non-conforming goods, or demand specific performance in certain cases. Seller's Remedies: Include the right to withhold delivery, stop delivery of goods in transit, resell the goods and recover damages, or cancel the contract. Understanding UCC’s Impact. The UCC simplifies commercial transactions and offers a uniform framework that benefits both buyers and sellers by reducing the costs and complexities associated with doing business across state lines. Its provisions on contract formation, performance, and remedies address the unique needs of commercial transactions, differing significantly from common law in several respects. For example, the UCC's approach to the battle of the forms and its rules on warranties and remedies reflect the realities of modern commerce, where transactions often occur rapidly and without the formal exchange of detailed contract terms. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Juvenile Justice: Navigating Youth in the Criminal Justice System. Foundational Differences. The juvenile justice system operates on a foundation fundamentally distinct from adult criminal procedures, emphasizing rehabilitation over punishment. This approach reflects the understanding that youth possess a greater capacity for change, necessitating a system that supports rather than penalizes this potential for growth. The primary objectives include providing guidance, education, and rehabilitative services to steer juveniles away from future criminal activity. Key Legal Frameworks and Cases. In re Gault (1967): A landmark case that guaranteed juveniles the right to a fair trial, access to counsel, and the right against self-incrimination, aligning juvenile proceedings more closely with adult constitutional protections. Juvenile Delinquency Prevention and Control Act (1968) and its reauthorization, the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (1974), emphasized deinstitutionalization, prevention, and community-based interventions for juvenile offenders. Roper v Simmons (2005): The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that imposing the death penalty on individuals who were under 18 at the time of their crime violates the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishments, reflecting a broader understanding of adolescence as a unique stage of human development. Diversion Programs and Rehabilitation. Diversion programs exemplify the juvenile justice system's rehabilitative approach, offering alternatives to formal judicial proceedings. These programs aim to redirect juveniles from the justice system through community service, counseling, or educational opportunities, based on the belief that supportive interventions can more effectively address underlying issues leading to delinquent behavior. Technological Advances and Criminal Procedure: The Digital Dilemma. Surveillance Technology. The proliferation of advanced surveillance technologies such as drones, facial recognition, and data aggregation tools has significantly impacted privacy rights and criminal investigations. These technologies enable law enforcement to gather vast amounts of information with unprecedented precision and speed, raising critical questions about the balance between security and civil liberties. Carpenter v United States (2018): This case represents a pivotal moment in the Supreme Court's approach to digital privacy, ruling that accessing historical cell phone records to track an individual's location over an extended period constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment, thereby requiring a warrant. Digital Evidence: Challenges and Legal Standards. The digital landscape has introduced complex challenges in collecting, preserving, and presenting digital evidence in criminal proceedings. Cybercrimes, digital fraud, and online harassment necessitate sophisticated techniques for evidence gathering, underscored by the need to maintain the integrity and authenticity of digital data. Legal Standards: The Federal Rules of Evidence and various state laws provide frameworks for the admissibility of digital evidence, emphasizing the importance of authenticity, reliability, and the absence of tampering. Digital forensic experts play a crucial role in ensuring that digital evidence meets these stringent standards. Encryption and Privacy. The tension between encryption technologies and law enforcement's need to access digital data for investigations epitomizes the ongoing debate over privacy and security. Cases such as Apple Inc. vs. FBI (2016) highlight the challenges posed by encryption in criminal investigations, underscoring the delicate balance between protecting individual privacy and ensuring public safety. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

1. Theft, Robbery, and Burglary. Theft. Definition and Elements: Theft, often referred to as larceny, is the unlawful taking of someone else's property without their consent with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of it. The essence of theft is the violation of an individual's right to possess their property. Types of Theft: Theft can range from petty theft, involving items of lesser value, to grand theft, involving property of significant value or of a specific type such as automobiles or firearms. Robbery. Definition and Elements: Robbery elevates theft by involving the use or threat of force. It is a direct assault on an individual’s safety, as well as their property rights. The intent to steal must be accompanied by the use of force or intimidation to overcome the victim’s resistance. Armed Robbery: When the perpetrator uses a weapon, the crime is often classified as armed or aggravated robbery, subjecting the offender to more severe penalties. Burglary. Definition and Elements: Burglary involves entering a building or structure with the intent to commit a crime therein, typically theft. The unlawful entry can be achieved by breaking and entering, but also by entering through an open door with criminal intent. Modern Statutes: Modern legal definitions of burglary have expanded to include various types of structures and to cover instances where the perpetrator has legal access to the structure but exceeds or abuses that access to commit a crime. Arson. Definition and Elements: Arson is the willful and malicious burning of property. While historically focused on buildings, modern statutes extend to property such as vehicles and land. Arson is considered a crime against property and, given its potential to cause harm or death, also poses significant public safety concerns. Degrees of Arson: Many jurisdictions classify arson in degrees, with first-degree arson typically involving occupied structures or intent to cause harm, carrying the most severe penalties. Criminal Mischief. Definition and Elements: Criminal mischief, also known as vandalism, involves intentionally damaging, defacing, or destroying someone else’s property. Graffiti, breaking windows, and slashing tires are common examples. Legal Considerations: The severity of criminal mischief charges often depends on the extent of damage and the cost of repair or replacement. In some cases, if the act is motivated by bias or hate, additional hate crime penalties can apply. White Collar Crimes. Overview: White-collar crimes are financially motivated, non-violent crimes committed by individuals, businesses, or government officials. The term reflects the social status of the typical perpetrators - professionals in a "white-collar" occupation. Types and Examples: This category includes embezzlement, insider trading, tax evasion, and various forms of fraud. These crimes are characterized by deceit or breach of trust, not by the application or threat of physical force. Fraud. Definition and Elements: Fraud involves wrongful or criminal deception intended to result in financial or personal gain. It requires a misrepresentation of fact, knowledge that the representation was false, intent to deceive, justifiable reliance by the victim, and resulting loss. Common Forms of Fraud: This includes but is not limited to, identity theft, credit card fraud, securities fraud, and insurance fraud. Each form of fraud has specific legal elements and defenses. Understanding property crimes requires not just a grasp of the legal definitions but an appreciation for the societal and individual harm they cause. Property crimes not only result in economic loss but can also create a sense of violation and insecurity among victims. Legal professionals must navigate these cases with a deep understanding of the law, a strategic approach to defense or prosecution, and a compassionate awareness of the human elements involved. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Section 7: Appeals. Appeals are a fundamental aspect of the judicial process, allowing parties to seek review of a lower court's decision by a higher court. This process is critical for correcting errors, ensuring consistent application of the law, and upholding the principles of justice. Understanding the appellate procedure, including how to initiate an appeal and the standards of review, is essential for any legal professional. Notice of Appeal. The first step in the appellate process is the filing of a notice of appeal. This document is a formal statement notifying the court and the opposing party that the appellant (the party appealing the decision) is challenging the lower court's decision. Procedural Requirements. Time Frame: One of the most critical aspects of the notice of appeal is the time frame. Under the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after the entry of the judgment or order being appealed. This time limit is strictly enforced, and failing to file within this period typically results in the loss of the right to appeal. Content: The notice of appeal must specify the party or parties taking the appeal, designate the judgment or order being appealed, and name the court to which the appeal is taken. Filing and Service: The notice must be filed with the clerk of the court that issued the judgment. Additionally, a copy of the notice must be served to the opposing party. Standards of Review. The standard of review is the lens through which the appellate court evaluates the lower court's decision. Different standards apply depending on the nature of the issue under review. De Novo Review: For questions of law, such as the interpretation of a statute or the constitutionality of a law, appellate courts apply a de novo review. Under this standard, the appellate court considers the question anew, with no deference to the lower court’s decision. Abuse of Discretion: This standard applies to decisions made at the discretion of the trial judge, such as rulings on certain procedural matters or evidentiary issues. The appellate court will overturn such a decision only if it finds that the trial judge's decision was arbitrary or irrational. Clearly Erroneous: This standard is used for findings of fact. An appellate court will defer to the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. This high deference is based on the principle that the trial court, having observed the presentation of evidence and the demeanor of witnesses, is in a better position to make factual determinations. Appellate Procedure. The appellate procedure involves several stages, from the filing of the notice of appeal to the appellate court's decision. Record on Appeal: After the notice of appeal is filed, the next step is to prepare the record on appeal. This record includes all documents and transcripts of proceedings from the trial court relevant to the appealed issues. Briefs: The appellant and appellee (the party opposing the appeal) must submit written briefs to the appellate court. The appellant's brief outlines the arguments against the trial court's decision, including legal theories and supporting evidence. The appellee's brief counters these arguments, defending the lower court's decision. Oral Argument: After the briefs are submitted, most appellate courts schedule an oral argument. During this proceeding, the attorneys for both sides present their arguments to the judges and may be questioned by the judges. Decision: After considering the record, briefs, and oral arguments, the appellate court will issue a decision. This decision may affirm (uphold), reverse (overturn), or remand (send back) the case to the lower court for further proceedings. Opinion: The court's decision is accompanied by a written opinion, which explains the reasoning behind the decision. The opinion is important as it provides guidance for lower courts and future cases. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

The State Action Doctrine. Essential Overview. The State Action Doctrine is central to understanding the application of constitutional protections. It holds that constitutional rights are generally only enforceable against the government and its agents, not private parties. This doctrine stems from the language of the Constitution and its amendments, which are predominantly framed as prohibitions against government action. Development and Significance. The doctrine's development has been crucial in civil rights cases, where the distinction between state and private action can determine the applicability of constitutional protections. Key decisions in this area have shaped the contours of civil rights enforcement and individual liberties in the United States. Public Functions and Private Actors. Distinguishing Government from Private Action. A critical aspect of the State Action Doctrine is distinguishing between what constitutes governmental action, subject to constitutional standards, and what is considered private conduct, generally not subject to the same standards. This distinction is not always clear-cut and has been the subject of significant legal interpretation. Tests and Criteria. The Supreme Court has developed several tests to determine when private conduct might be considered state action. For instance, the "public function" test considers whether the private entity is performing a function that is traditionally and exclusively governmental. The "nexus" test looks at the relationship between the state and the private conduct, asking whether the state has significantly involved itself with the private actions. Illustrative Cases. Cases like Marsh v Alabama (1946), where a private town's streets were held to be subject to the First Amendment, and Burton v Wilmington Parking Authority (1961), where a private restaurant's discrimination was deemed state action due to its location in a public building, demonstrate the application of these principles. State Action and Enforcement of Civil Rights. Impact on Civil Rights Litigation. The State Action Doctrine plays a pivotal role in civil rights litigation. Its application determines the extent to which constitutional protections, like equal protection and freedom from discrimination, can be invoked in situations involving private actors. Private Conduct and Statutory Protections. While the State Action Doctrine limits the direct application of constitutional protections to private conduct, various federal and state laws fill this gap. Statutes like the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Americans with Disabilities Act extend many of the principles of constitutional civil rights protections to private entities, particularly in areas like employment, housing, and public accommodations. Challenges and Evolving Interpretations. The boundaries of state action are continually tested and reinterpreted in response to changing societal conditions and legal philosophies. For instance, issues like internet censorship, platform neutrality, and private entities performing traditionally governmental roles pose new challenges to the doctrine's application. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

1. Assignment and Delegation. Assignment of Rights. Definition: Assignment involves transferring contractual rights from one party (assignor) to another (assignee). Effectiveness: For an assignment to be effective, the assignor must intend to make the assignment and not merely promise to assign in the future. Limitations: Assignments that materially change the duties or risks of the obligor, violate the law or public policy, or are prohibited by the contract itself, are not allowed. Delegation of Duties. Definition: Delegation is the transfer of contractual duties from one party (delegator) to another (delegatee). Obligor’s Consent: Generally, contractual duties can be delegated without the obligor’s consent unless the contract prohibits delegation or the duties are highly personal in nature. Delegator's Liability: The delegator remains liable to the obligee for the performance of the contractual duty. Rights of the Assignee. Rights Acquired: The assignee steps into the shoes of the assignor and acquires the rights under the contract. Enforcement: The assignee can enforce the rights against the obligor, subject to the same defenses the obligor could have raised against the assignor. Notification: It is generally advisable for the assignee to notify the obligor of the assignment to protect their rights. Obligations of the Delegator. Liability: The delegator remains liable for the performance of the contractual obligations unless the obligee agrees to release them and accept the delegatee as the new party to the contract. 2. Third-Party Beneficiary Contracts. Third-party beneficiary contracts create rights or benefits for a person who is not a party to the contract. Intended Beneficiaries. Definition: Intended beneficiaries are those whom the contracting parties intend to benefit at the time of contracting. Rights: Intended beneficiaries can enforce the contract if they meet certain criteria: the performance under the contract must satisfy a duty owed to the beneficiary, and the contract must clearly express an intention to benefit the third party. Vesting of Rights: Rights of the intended beneficiary vest when they learn of and detrimentally rely on the contract, assent to it at the request of the parties, or file a lawsuit to enforce it. Case Example: In Lawrence v Fox (1859), the court held that a third-party beneficiary could sue the promisor directly to enforce the promise. Incidental Beneficiaries. Definition: Incidental beneficiaries are third parties who may benefit from the performance of a contract but for whom the benefit was not intended. Lack of Enforceable Rights: Incidental beneficiaries do not have rights to enforce the contract as they are not the intended focus of the contract. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Appeals. Grounds for Appeal. An appeal in criminal law is a request to a higher court to review and change the decision of a lower court. The grounds for appeal can include: Legal Error: Arguing that a legal mistake was made during the trial. Insufficient Evidence: Claiming that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to justify the verdict. Prosecutorial Misconduct: Alleging improper actions by the prosecutor. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Arguing that the defense attorney's performance was so poor it affected the trial's outcome. Sentencing Errors: Challenges to the legality or reasonableness of the sentence imposed. Procedure and Standards of Review. The appeals process involves several steps: Filing a Notice of Appeal: This is the first step, usually filed with the trial court. Preparation of the Record: The trial court record, including all documents and transcripts, is prepared for the appellate court. Briefs Submission: Both parties submit written arguments (briefs) to the appellate court. Oral Arguments: In some cases, the court allows oral arguments from both parties. Standards of Review: De Novo Review: The appellate court reviews legal issues with a fresh perspective. Abuse of Discretion: Used for reviewing decisions at the trial court’s discretion. Clear Error: Applied when reviewing factual findings. Habeas Corpus. Purpose and Procedure. Habeas corpus is a legal procedure that challenges the legality of a person's detention, imprisonment, or other restraint. Key Aspects: Initiating a Petition: A person in custody files a petition arguing their imprisonment is unlawful. Grounds for Habeas Corpus: Typical grounds include constitutional rights violations, lack of sufficient evidence, or errors in applying the law. Federal and State Considerations. Habeas corpus petitions can be filed in both state and federal courts, but the considerations differ: State Habeas Corpus: Used for challenging a state court’s decision on grounds of constitutional rights violations. Federal Habeas Corpus: Typically employed after state remedies are exhausted, challenging federal constitutional violations. Exhaustion of State Remedies. Before a federal habeas corpus petition can be considered, the petitioner must exhaust all available state court remedies. Significance of Exhaustion Requirement: This requirement prevents premature interference with state criminal proceedings and respects state court systems. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

1. Damages. Damages are monetary compensation awarded to a party who has suffered loss or harm due to another party's breach of contract. They are intended to put the injured party in the position they would have been in if the contract had been performed as agreed. Compensatory Damages. Definition: Compensatory damages are intended to compensate the non-breaching party for the loss of the bargain. Calculation: These damages are calculated based on the actual loss incurred and the expected benefit of the contract. Hawkins v McGee (1929): Often cited in law schools, this case involved a breach of a surgery contract, demonstrating the calculation of compensatory damages as the difference between the promised result and the actual result. Consequential Damages (Special Damages). Definition: Consequential damages are awarded for losses that do not flow directly from the breach but result from the non-breaching party’s unique circumstances. Requirements: The breaching party must have known or had reason to know that such damages would result from the breach at the time the contract was made. Hadley v Baxendale (1854): This seminal case established the principle that consequential damages must be foreseeable and directly related to the breach. Punitive Damages. Rarity in Contract Law: Punitive damages are rare in contract law and are typically awarded only when the breach involves a tort, such as fraud. Purpose: They are intended to punish the breaching party and deter future misconduct. Nominal Damages. Symbolic Award: Nominal damages are a small monetary amount awarded when a breach has occurred, but the non-breaching party has not suffered a quantifiable financial loss. Significance: They are significant in establishing that a breach occurred, even if no actual damages resulted. 2. Equitable Remedies. Equitable remedies are non-monetary and are awarded when monetary damages are insufficient to remedy the harm caused by a breach. Specific Performance. Definition: Specific performance is an order by the court requiring the breaching party to perform their obligations under the contract. Applicability: It is typically used in cases involving unique goods or property, where monetary damages would be inadequate. Limitations: Courts are hesitant to order specific performance in contracts for personal services to avoid involuntary servitude. Injunctions. Definition: An injunction is a court order directing a party to do or refrain from doing a specific act. Use in Contract Law: Injunctions may be used to prevent a party from breaching a contract or to stop ongoing breaches. Rescission. Definition: Rescission is the cancellation of the contract, with both parties returning any benefits received under the contract. Grounds for Rescission: It can be granted in cases of misrepresentation, fraud, mistake, duress, or undue influence. 3. Liquidated Damages and Penalty Clauses. Liquidated Damages. Definition: Liquidated damages are a specific sum agreed upon by the parties at the time of contract formation as a reasonable estimation of damages in the event of a breach. Enforceability: To be enforceable, the amount must be a reasonable forecast of the probable loss and not a penalty. Penalty Clauses. Distinction from Liquidated Damages: Penalty clauses are not enforceable because they are intended to punish the breaching party rather than to compensate the non-breaching party for losses. Determining a Penalty: A clause is likely a penalty if the liquidated damages are excessively high compared to the actual harm. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

1. Assault and Battery. Assault. Definition and Elements: Assault is an intentional act by one person that creates an apprehension in another of an imminent harmful or offensive contact. It involves an attempt or threat to inflict bodily harm upon another. Intention and Apprehension: The key element in assault is the intention to cause apprehension of harmful or offensive contact. The victim must have a reasonable apprehension of imminent harm. Types of Assault: Assault can be either simple or aggravated. Simple assault involves minor injury or a limited threat of violence, while aggravated assault involves the use of a weapon or the intent to commit a serious crime, like rape or murder. Battery. Definition and Elements: Battery is the intentional and wrongful physical contact with another person without their consent. Unlike assault, battery requires actual physical contact. Intent and Contact: The key elements include the intent to make contact and the harmful or offensive nature of the contact. The contact does not need to cause injury or pain to qualify as battery. Examples and Application: Examples include hitting another person, spitting on someone, or unwanted sexual touching. 2. Kidnapping and False Imprisonment. Kidnapping. Definition and Elements: Kidnapping is the unlawful transportation and confinement of a person against their will. It involves taking or moving someone to another place without their consent and with the intent to deprive them of their liberty. Aggravated Kidnapping: This usually involves kidnapping with additional elements such as kidnapping for ransom, kidnapping with the intent to harm or kill, or kidnapping during the commission of another crime. Jurisdictional Issues: Kidnapping often involves crossing state lines, which can make it a federal offense, subject to federal jurisdiction and penalties. False Imprisonment. Definition and Elements: False imprisonment is the unlawful restraint of a person's freedom of movement. It involves intentionally restricting another person's ability to move freely without legal authority. Distinction from Kidnapping: Unlike kidnapping, false imprisonment does not necessarily involve moving the victim to another location. It can occur in the place where the victim is initially found. Examples and Application: Examples include locking someone in a room without their consent, physically restraining someone from leaving, or detaining someone with unjust legal authority. 3. Sex Offenses: Rape and Statutory Rape. Rape. Definition and Elements: Rape is a serious sex offense involving non-consensual sexual intercourse. The key element is the lack of consent from the victim. Force or Threat: Traditionally, rape required proof of force or the threat of force. However, modern statutes often focus on the lack of consent, without necessarily requiring proof of force. Consent Issues: The issue of consent is central in rape cases. Factors affecting consent can include intoxication, mental incapacity, or deception. Statutory Rape. Definition and Elements: Statutory rape is sexual intercourse with a person who is below the legal age of consent. Unlike traditional rape, it does not require proof of force or lack of consent. Age of Consent: The age of consent varies by jurisdiction, but it is generally between 16 and 18 years in the United States. The law assumes that individuals below this age cannot legally consent to sexual activities. Strict Liability: Statutory rape is often a strict liability offense, meaning the defendant's knowledge or belief about the victim's age is usually irrelevant. The act itself, irrespective of consent or the perpetrator's knowledge, constitutes the offense. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Judgment and Post-Judgment Procedures. Entry of Judgment. After the jury or judge renders a verdict, the next step is the entry of judgment. The entry of judgment is the formal process where the court records the outcome of the case. In a jury trial, the verdict becomes the judgment. In a bench trial, the judge will issue findings of fact and conclusions of law, which then form the basis for the judgment. Finality of Judgment. A judgment is considered final when it resolves all the claims against all the parties. Finality is crucial because, generally, only final judgments can be appealed. However, there are exceptions where interlocutory orders (orders made during the litigation process but before the final judgment) can be appealed. Challenging a Judgment. Parties have several options to challenge a judgment, including filing post-trial motions or appealing the decision. These challenges are based on the premise that errors were made during the trial or the judgment is contrary to the law or evidence presented. Standards for Decision. When reviewing post-trial motions or appeals, courts adhere to specific standards for decision-making. These standards guide the courts in evaluating whether the trial court made an error and whether that error warrants a reversal or modification of the judgment. De Novo Review: This is used for questions of law. The appellate court gives no deference to the trial court's decision and reviews the issue from the beginning. Abuse of Discretion: This standard is applied in reviewing a trial court's discretionary decisions, such as evidentiary rulings. The appellate court will only overturn a decision if it finds that the trial court acted arbitrarily or irrationally. Clearly Erroneous: This standard is used for findings of fact in a bench trial. An appellate court will not overturn a trial court's factual finding unless it is clearly erroneous. Post-Trial Motions. Post-trial motions are tools used to ask the trial court to reconsider or alter its judgment. The most common post-trial motions are motions for a new trial and motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV). Motion for a New Trial. A motion for a new trial, under Rule 59 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, asks the court to vacate the judgment and conduct a new trial. Grounds for a new trial include: Procedural Errors: Significant mistakes in how the trial was conducted. Newly Discovered Evidence: Evidence that could not have been discovered with reasonable diligence before or during the trial. Prejudicial Misconduct: Misconduct by the jury, a party, or even the judge that affected the trial's outcome. Legal Errors: Errors in the judge's application or interpretation of the law. Verdict Against the Weight of the Evidence: When the jury's verdict is against the overwhelming evidence. Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict (JNOV). A motion for JNOV, under Rule 50(b), is a request for the court to enter a judgment contrary to the jury's verdict. This motion argues that no reasonable jury could have reached the given verdict based on the evidence presented. JNOV is only available in jury trials and can be raised if the party previously moved for a directed verdict (now called a motion for judgment as a matter of law) at the close of all evidence. JNOV focuses on the sufficiency of the evidence. The court views the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, and if it finds that a reasonable jury could not have reached the verdict, it may set aside the jury's decision and enter a different judgment. Conclusion. Post-trial motions play a crucial role in the litigation process, providing parties with an opportunity to correct errors or address issues that arose during the trial. They are an essential aspect of the checks and balances in the judicial system, ensuring that the final judgment is fair, just, and in accordance with the law. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Substantive Due Process. Definition and Development. Substantive Due Process is the doctrine that the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments do more than ensure fair procedures; they also protect certain fundamental rights from government interference, regardless of the procedural protections in place. This doctrine emerged as a means to safeguard individual liberties against majority rule and government overreach. Early Interpretation. Initially, the Supreme Court used substantive due process to protect economic rights, as in Lochner v New York (1905), where the Court struck down a state labor law on the grounds that it interfered with the freedom of contract, a fundamental right. However, this approach was controversial and led to accusations of judicial overreach. Shift to Personal Liberties. In the mid-20th century, the focus of substantive due process shifted from economic rights to personal liberties. Landmark cases like Griswold v Connecticut (1965) and Roe v Wade (1973) extended its application to privacy rights and reproductive autonomy, establishing that certain personal decisions are beyond the reach of governmental intrusion. Contemporary Issues. Substantive due process remains a dynamic area of constitutional law, dealing with issues ranging from family relations to sexual autonomy and bodily integrity. Its boundaries and applications are regularly tested in courts, reflecting changing societal values and norms. Procedural Due Process. Framework. Procedural Due Process, grounded in the same constitutional provisions as substantive due process, focuses on the process required by the government before depriving a person of life, liberty, or property. It ensures fair procedures and safeguards against arbitrary government action. Life, Liberty, and Property Interests. The Supreme Court has interpreted these interests broadly. Life is the most straightforward, while liberty encompasses a range of personal freedoms, from physical freedom to fundamental rights like parental rights and freedom from unjustified reputational harm. Property interests go beyond physical possessions to include legitimate claims or entitlements, like government benefits. Required Procedures. The procedures required by due process vary depending on the situation but generally include notice, the opportunity to be heard, and a fair and impartial decision-making process. The landmark case Matthews v Eldridge (1976) established a balancing test to determine the specific procedural safeguards required in a given case, weighing the private interest, the risk of erroneous deprivation, and the government's interest. Governmental Obligations. Procedural due process imposes significant obligations on the government, particularly in the criminal justice system. It requires fair and timely trials, impartial judges, and the opportunity for defendants to confront witnesses and present evidence. Economic Rights and Regulation. Historical Context. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the Supreme Court often used substantive due process to protect economic rights, like property rights and the freedom of contract. This era, known as the Lochner era, saw the Court striking down various state and federal regulations that interfered with these rights. Shift in Judicial Perspective. The Great Depression and the New Deal era marked a shift in the Court’s approach. Cases like West Coast Hotel Company v Parrish (1937) signaled the end of the Lochner era, as the Court upheld state labor regulations, acknowledging the government's role in addressing economic inequalities and public welfare. Modern View. Today, the Court is generally deferential to government economic regulation, applying rational basis review in most cases. This deferential approach allows for a wide range of government interventions in the economy, from labor standards to environmental regulations, reflecting a recognition of the government's role in managing complex modern --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

1. Obligations and Discharge. In contract law, the performance of obligations and the conditions under which these obligations are discharged are central concepts. Understanding these principles is essential for assessing contract completion, breaches, and potential remedies. Performance Standards. Performance to Agreed Standards: A contract must be performed to the standards and terms as agreed upon by the parties. This includes meeting the quality, time, and manner specifications laid out in the contract. Substantial Performance: In some cases, a party's performance may be considered sufficient if it substantially complies with the contractual terms, albeit with minor deviations. Substantial performance still entitles the performing party to payment, possibly minus damages for the minor deviations. Jacob & Youngs v Kent (1921): This case demonstrated substantial performance, where a contractor's failure to use a specified brand of pipe was considered a minor breach, allowing the contractor to still receive payment minus the cost of the deviation. Discharge by Agreement. Mutual Rescission: The parties can mutually agree to rescind the contract, effectively releasing each other from their obligations. Novation: A new contract replaces the old one, usually involving a new party. Accord and Satisfaction: An agreement (accord) and its execution (satisfaction) replace an existing obligation with a new one. Discharge by Performance. Complete Performance: When all terms and conditions of the contract are fulfilled, the contract is discharged by performance. Tender of Performance: An offer to perform that is unjustifiably refused can discharge the offering party. Discharge by Operation of Law. Impossibility or Impracticability: If unforeseeable events make performance impossible or impracticable, the parties may be discharged from their obligations. Frustration of Purpose: If the fundamental purpose of the contract is frustrated by factors beyond the control of the parties, the contract may be discharged. Bankruptcy: Discharge of obligations through a bankruptcy proceeding. 2. Breach of Contract. A breach of contract occurs when a party fails to perform an obligation owed under the contract. Understanding the types of breaches and their legal implications is crucial for determining the appropriate remedies. Anticipatory Repudiation. Definition: Anticipatory repudiation occurs when a party unequivocally indicates that they will not perform their contractual obligations before the performance is due. Remedies: The non-breaching party can treat the repudiation as an immediate breach and seek remedies or wait for the time of performance to see if the repudiating party will perform. Hochster v De La Tour (1853): This case established that a party can sue for anticipatory breach before the performance date. Material v Minor Breach. Material Breach: A breach is material if it goes to the essence of the contract, significantly impairing the contract's value. It entitles the non-breaching party to all remedies for breach of contract, including termination of the contract and damages. Minor (Non-material) Breach: This occurs when the breach is not significant enough to impair the contract's value. The non-breaching party is still required to perform but can seek damages for the breach. Material v Minor in Case Law: The determination of whether a breach is material or minor is often fact-specific and can vary based on case law interpretations. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Pretrial Procedures. Arraignment. Arraignment is a critical stage in criminal proceedings, marking the formal start of a criminal case against an individual. Process of Arraignment: Reading of Charges: The defendant is informed of the charges against them. Entering a Plea: The defendant enters a plea (guilty, not guilty, or no contest). Appointment of Counsel: If the defendant cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed. Bail Hearing: A bail hearing may be conducted to determine if the defendant can be released from custody. Bail and Pretrial Detention. Bail is a system designed to ensure the defendant's appearance at trial while allowing them to remain free until the trial. Principles of Bail: Right to Bail: Most defendants have a right to bail, except in certain serious cases. Determining Bail Amount: Factors include the severity of the crime, flight risk, and the defendant’s criminal history. Controversies Surrounding Bail: Inequality in the Bail System: Concerns arise when defendants cannot afford bail, leading to unequal treatment based on economic status. Risk to Public Safety: Releasing potentially dangerous individuals on bail poses public safety risks. Plea Bargaining. Process and Legal Standards. Plea bargaining is a process where the defendant agrees to plead guilty to a lesser charge in exchange for a more lenient sentence or the dropping of other charges. Stages of Plea Bargaining: Negotiation: Involves discussions between the defense attorney, the prosecutor, and sometimes the judge. Agreement: A plea deal is reached, outlining the plea and the expected sentence. Court Approval: The court must approve the plea deal, ensuring it is voluntary and has a factual basis. Legal Requirements: Voluntariness: The defendant's decision to accept a plea deal must be voluntary and not coerced. Knowing and Intelligent Decision: The defendant must fully understand the rights they are waiving by pleading guilty. Ethical Considerations Ethical concerns in plea bargaining include: Pressure on Defendants: Concerns arise over whether defendants are pressured into accepting plea deals. Transparency and Fairness: Ensuring the plea bargaining process is transparent and fair to both parties. Overcrowded Court System Influence: The need to alleviate crowded court dockets should not compromise the quality of justice. Trial Process. Jury Selection. Jury selection, or voir dire, is the process of selecting the jurors who will decide the case. Process of Jury Selection: Summoning Potential Jurors: A group of potential jurors is summoned to court. Questioning: The judge and attorneys question the potential jurors to determine any biases or inability to be impartial. Selection: Jurors are selected to form the jury. Legal Standards for Jury Selection: Fair Cross-Section of the Community: The jury pool must represent a fair cross-section of the community. Elimination of Biased Jurors: Potential jurors who show bias or preconceived notions about the case can be removed. Burden of Proof. In a criminal trial, the burden of proof rests on the prosecution. Understanding Burden of Proof: Standard of Proof: The prosecution must prove the defendant’s guilt “beyond a reasonable doubt.” Reasonable Doubt: A standard of proof that ensures the jury is firmly convinced of the defendant’s guilt. Verdict and Sentencing. After the trial, the jury deliberates and reaches a verdict. If the defendant is found guilty, the judge determines the sentence. Steps in Verdict and Sentencing: Jury Deliberation: The jury discusses the case and votes on the verdict. Announcement of Verdict: The verdict is read in court. Sentencing: If guilty, the judge sentences the defendant, considering various factors like the nature of the crime and criminal history. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

1. Murder: First Degree, Second Degree, Felony Murder Rule. Murder is considered one of the most heinous crimes and is heavily penalized. It involves the unlawful killing of another human being and is categorized based on the defendant’s intent and the circumstances surrounding the killing. First-Degree Murder. Definition and Elements: First-degree murder is characterized by premeditation and deliberation. It involves planning the murder before it is carried out and is considered the most serious form of homicide. Premeditation and Deliberation: Premeditation means the defendant thought about the murder before it occurred, and deliberation implies the defendant considered the choice to kill and made a decision to do so. These elements distinguish first-degree murder from other forms of homicide. Examples and Application: Common scenarios include killings involving lying in wait, poison, or other pre-planned methods. Second-Degree Murder. Definition and Elements: Second-degree murder is typically defined as an intentional killing that is not premeditated or planned, nor committed in a reasonable "heat of passion." Malice Aforethought: This form of murder requires malice aforethought, meaning the defendant had a reckless disregard for human life. It is less severe than first-degree murder but still represents a serious form of homicide. Examples and Application: This might include impulsive killings or situations where the intent to kill forms on the spot. Felony Murder Rule. Definition and Application: The felony murder rule applies when a death occurs during the commission or attempted commission of a felony. The rule allows a defendant to be charged with first-degree murder if a death – even an accidental one – occurs during certain felonies, such as robbery or arson. Rationale and Limitations: The rationale behind the rule is to deter felons from using lethal violence during the commission of a felony. However, some jurisdictions have limitations on the application of this rule, often requiring that the death be a foreseeable result of the felony. 2. Manslaughter: Voluntary and Involuntary. Manslaughter is a less severe form of homicide compared to murder, often categorized based on the defendant's state of mind and circumstances of the act. Voluntary Manslaughter. Definition and Elements: Voluntary manslaughter involves killing in the "heat of passion" in response to provocation. This provocation must be such that it would cause a reasonable person to lose self-control. Heat of Passion: The key element here is that the defendant must not have had time to "cool off" between the provocation and the killing. It mitigates, but does not excuse, the killing. Examples and Application: This might include killing a spouse upon immediately discovering their infidelity. Involuntary Manslaughter. Definition and Elements: Involuntary manslaughter occurs when a death results from a reckless act or criminal negligence. It does not involve the intent to kill or cause serious harm. Criminal Negligence: The defendant’s actions must demonstrate a gross deviation from a reasonable standard of care, showing a disregard for human life. Examples and Application: A common example is vehicular homicide, where reckless driving leads to someone's death. 3. Negligent Homicide. Negligent homicide involves causing the death of another through criminal negligence. It’s a less serious form of homicide compared to murder and manslaughter. Definition and Elements: This crime occurs when a person's negligence is so grossly negligent that it becomes criminal. This typically involves a failure to be aware of a substantial and unjustifiable risk that constitutes a gross deviation from the standard of conduct that a law-abiding person would observe in the actor's situation. Distinction from Manslaughter: The key difference between negligent homicide and involuntary manslaughter often lies in the degree of negligence. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Jury Selection and the Role of the Jury Jury Selection (Voir Dire) Jury selection, or voir dire, is the process of selecting jurors who will decide the case. It involves questioning prospective jurors to uncover biases or preconceptions that may affect their impartiality. The goal is to assemble a jury capable of rendering a fair and impartial verdict based on the evidence presented. The process typically starts with a large pool of potential jurors. Both attorneys (and sometimes the judge) question these individuals about their backgrounds, beliefs, and any potential connections to the case. This questioning helps identify any jurors who might be unable to be impartial. Attorneys can challenge potential jurors using two types of challenges: Peremptory Challenges: These allow an attorney to exclude a juror without stating a reason. However, they cannot be used to exclude jurors based on race, ethnicity, or gender, as established in cases like Batson v. Kentucky. Challenges for Cause: These are used when an attorney can demonstrate that a juror cannot be impartial. There is no limit to the number of these challenges. Bench Trials In a bench trial, there is no jury, and the judge acts as both the trier of fact and the decider of law. Bench trials are common in cases where the factual issues are not in significant dispute or are highly technical, and legal expertise is paramount. The procedures in a bench trial are generally the same as in a jury trial, but the judge will make the final decision on both the facts and the law. Pretrial Motions Pretrial motions are legal requests filed by parties to obtain a ruling or order from the court before the trial starts. These motions aim to resolve certain issues, clarify the matters to be tried, or even dispose of the case without a trial. Motions in Limine One of the most common pretrial motions is the motion in limine, which seeks to admit or exclude certain evidence before it is presented at trial. These motions are crucial because they help avoid the presentation of prejudicial, irrelevant, or otherwise inadmissible evidence to the jury. Rulings on motions in limine shape the scope of evidence that will be presented during the trial. Opening Statements The trial begins with opening statements, where each party outlines their case and what they intend to prove. The plaintiff's attorney usually goes first, followed by the defendant's attorney. Opening statements are not evidence but provide a roadmap of what each side believes the evidence will show. Presentation of Evidence The bulk of the trial involves the presentation of evidence. The plaintiff presents their case first, followed by the defendant. Evidence includes witness testimony, documents, and physical objects. Each witness is subject to direct examination by the party that called them and cross-examination by the opposing party. Closing Arguments After the evidence has been presented, each side makes closing arguments. This is the opportunity for the attorneys to summarize the evidence, draw inferences, and persuade the jury or judge to rule in their favor. Jury Instructions and Deliberation In a jury trial, after closing arguments, the judge provides the jury with instructions on the law that applies to the case. The jury then deliberates in private, applying the law to the facts as they have determined them from the evidence. Their deliberations conclude with a verdict. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Strict Scrutiny Applied to laws that affect fundamental rights or target suspect classifications (such as race or national origin), strict scrutiny is the most stringent standard. Under this review, a law is constitutional only if it serves a compelling state interest and is narrowly tailored to achieve that interest with the least restrictive means. Cases like Brown v. Board of Education (1954), which ended racial segregation in public schools, exemplify the application of strict scrutiny. Intermediate Scrutiny Used mainly for laws that classify based on gender or legitimacy, intermediate scrutiny requires the law to further an important government interest in a way that is substantially related to that interest. This standard, less rigorous than strict scrutiny, was developed in cases like Craig v. Boren (1976), which dealt with gender discrimination in alcohol laws. Rational Basis Review The most lenient standard, rational basis review, is applied to all other classifications. A law will pass this review if it is rationally related to a legitimate government interest. This standard gives a great deal of deference to legislative choices. A notable case is Railway Express Agency v. New York (1949), where the court upheld a city regulation under rational basis review. Racial Discrimination and Affirmative Action The fight against racial discrimination has been at the forefront of constitutional law, reflecting America's ongoing struggle with its racial history. Historical Context Initially, the Supreme Court upheld racial segregation (Plessy v. Ferguson, 1896), endorsing the "separate but equal" doctrine. However, this began to change with cases like Brown v. Board of Education, which declared state laws establishing separate public schools for black and white students unconstitutional. Affirmative Action In recent decades, affirmative action policies aimed at rectifying historical racial injustices have been a focal point. Key cases include Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978), where the Court held that race could be one of several factors in Gender Discrimination and Gender Equality Gender discrimination and the fight for gender equality have evolved significantly in constitutional law. Evolution of Gender Equality Cases like United States v. Virginia (1996), which opened the Virginia Military Institute to women, reflect the increasing recognition of gender equality. The Court has expanded the understanding of discrimination to include not just overtly discriminatory laws but also those that have a disparate impact on a particular gender. Age Discrimination Age discrimination in employment is a significant issue. While the Equal Protection Clause itself does not explicitly protect against age discrimination, statutes like the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) have been enacted to protect older workers. Constitutional challenges in this area typically receive rational basis review. Disability Discrimination The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 represents a landmark in fighting discrimination against individuals with disabilities. While the ADA is a statutory protection, the Supreme Court has addressed disability rights under the Constitution, especially in contexts like access to public services and accommodations. Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity One of the most significant developments in recent years has been the recognition of rights based on sexual orientation and gender identity. In cases like Obergefell v. Hodges (2015), the Supreme Court recognized same-sex marriage as a fundamental right under the Constitution. This decision and others, like Bostock v. Clayton County (2020), which extended workplace protections to LGBTQ individuals, mark a pivotal shift towards broader recognition of sexual orientation and gender identity rights. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

1. The Parol Evidence Rule. The Parol Evidence Rule is a pivotal concept in contract law, dealing with the admissibility of extrinsic evidence (evidence outside the written contract) in interpreting written agreements. Definition and Purpose. The Parol Evidence Rule prohibits the admission of extrinsic evidence to contradict, vary, add to, or subtract from the terms of a written contract that is intended to be a complete and final expression of the parties’ agreement. The rule aims to preserve the integrity of written agreements by preventing parties from trying to modify their contract through oral or written statements made prior to or at the time of execution. Exceptions and Applications While the Parol Evidence Rule seems strict, several exceptions allow for the introduction of extrinsic evidence: To Clarify Ambiguities: If the written contract is ambiguous, extrinsic evidence can be introduced to clarify the ambiguity. To Prove a Defense Against Formation: Evidence can be brought to show that the contract should be invalidated for reasons such as fraud, duress, mistake, or lack of consideration. To Show Subsequent Modifications: The rule does not apply to agreements that modify the contract after it has been written. To Prove Conditions Precedent: Evidence may be admitted to show that a written agreement was conditional upon the occurrence of some event or condition. Collateral Agreements: Separate and distinct agreements that do not contradict the main contract can be proved by extrinsic evidence. Relevant Case Law Masterson v. Sine (1968): This case illustrates the application of the Parol Evidence Rule in the context of a property sale, allowing evidence of a collateral agreement to a written contract. 2. Warranties and Conditions. Express and Implied Warranties. Warranties are assurances or guarantees about the nature or quality of the goods or services involved in a contract. Express Warranties: These are explicit assurances about the quality, description, or performance of the goods. They can be created by descriptions of the goods, affirmations of fact, or by providing samples or models. Implied Warranties: These are unspoken, unwritten guarantees, arising from the nature of the transaction or the inherent understanding of the parties. Implied Warranty of Merchantability: Guarantees that the goods are of average quality, generally fit for the purpose for which they are sold. Implied Warranty of Fitness for a Particular Purpose: Arises when a buyer relies on the seller's expertise to select goods fit for a specific purpose. Implied Warranty of Title: Implies that the seller has the right to sell the property and that it is free from any liens or encumbrances not disclosed at the time of sale. Conditions Precedent, Subsequent, and Concurrent Conditions in a contract are events or actions that must occur before a party's obligation under a contract becomes due or is discharged. Condition Precedent: A condition that must be fulfilled before a party’s performance can be required. For instance, a home buyer’s obligation to pay might be contingent on a satisfactory home inspection. Condition Subsequent: This condition extinguishes a contractual duty if a future event occurs. For example, a lease may be terminated if the property is sold. Concurrent Conditions: These are mutual conditions that must occur or be performed at the same time. Each party’s performance is conditional upon the other party’s simultaneous performance. In conclusion, understanding the nuances of the Parol Evidence Rule, warranties, and conditions is vital for navigating contract law. These concepts are not just theoretical; they have practical implications in drafting, interpreting, and enforcing contracts. A deep understanding of these areas will not only help you excel in your legal studies and the Bar Exam but also in your future legal practice. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Welcome to Module 4, where we'll examine the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution. The Sixth Amendment is a vital component of the Bill of Rights, providing critical protections for individuals accused of crimes. It guarantees the rights to a speedy and public trial, an impartial jury, the right to confront witnesses, and the right to counsel. This module will delve deeply into each of these rights, exploring their historical background, legal interpretations, and contemporary relevance. Right to Counsel. Attachment of the Right. The right to counsel is fundamental to ensuring a fair trial. It attaches when a defendant faces a critical stage of prosecution, such as arraignment, trial, sentencing, and certain post-conviction proceedings. Historical Background and Development: Traced back to the 1932 Powell v. Alabama case, where the Supreme Court recognized the necessity of counsel in capital cases. The landmark case of Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) expanded this right, guaranteeing counsel to all defendants in felony cases. Effective Assistance of Counsel. The Sixth Amendment not only guarantees the right to counsel but also ensures that this representation is effective. Criteria for Effective Assistance: Competent Representation: Counsel must possess the knowledge, skill, and diligence reasonably necessary to provide competent representation. Advocacy Free of Conflict of Interest: The representation must be free from conflicts that could impair loyalty to the client. Strickland Test: A two-pronged test from Strickland v. Washington is used to evaluate ineffectiveness claims, requiring a defendant to show deficient performance by counsel and resulting prejudice. Speedy and Public Trial. Determining the Speedy Trial Period. The right to a speedy trial protects defendants from undue delays that can compromise the fairness of the trial and cause unnecessary anxiety and concern. Factors in Determining Speediness: Length of Delay: The length of the delay is the threshold factor. Reason for the Delay: Delays caused by the prosecution or for tactical advantage weigh against the government. Defendant’s Assertion of the Right: Whether and how often the defendant asserted their right to a speedy trial. Prejudice to the Defendant: Consideration of the prejudice to the defendant, such as impaired defense, anxiety, and public suspicion. Implications of a Violation. Violation of the right to a speedy trial can result in various remedies, including: Dismissal of Charges: The most common remedy for a violation of the right to a speedy trial. Reduced Sentence: In some cases, a violation can lead to a reduced sentence rather than dismissal. Confrontation Clause. Right to Confront Witnesses. The Confrontation Clause provides an accused the right to confront the witnesses against them. This is a critical component of a fair trial, ensuring the defendant can challenge the evidence presented. Application and Importance: Cross-Examination: The primary interest secured by the Confrontation Clause is the right of cross-examination. Exceptions: There are exceptions, such as in cases of child testimony in abuse cases or where the witness is unavailable but has given prior testimony. Exceptions and Limitations. While the Confrontation Clause is a fundamental right, certain exceptions and limitations apply: Forfeiture by Wrongdoing: If a defendant is found to have wrongfully caused a witness's unavailability, they forfeit the right to confront that witness. Statements Not Testimonial in Nature: Certain statements made for purposes other than legal proceedings may not trigger the right of confrontation. Reliability and Necessity: In some cases, the Supreme Court has allowed the admission of evidence where it is deemed reliable and necessary for the trial. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

1. Justifications: Self-Defense, Defense of Others, Defense of Property. Justifications are defenses where the defendant admits to committing the act but claims it was justified under the circumstances. These defenses acknowledge that, while the act was technically criminal, it was necessary in the context. Self-Defense. Definition and Elements: Self-defense is the right to prevent suffering force or violence through the use of a sufficient level of counteracting force or violence. The key elements include a reasonable belief of an imminent threat of unlawful force and the use of a proportionate amount of force in response. Reasonable Belief: The belief of threat must be both subjectively genuine and objectively reasonable. This means that the defendant must actually believe in the necessity of self-defense, and this belief must be one that a reasonable person would hold under the same circumstances. Proportionality: The force used in self-defense must be proportionate to the threat. Deadly force can only be used if the person reasonably believes that their life or that of another is in imminent danger. Defense of Others. Definition and Elements: This defense is similar to self-defense but is used to justify the use of force to protect another person. The defender must reasonably believe that the person they are defending is under an immediate threat of harm. Limits to the Defense: The same principles of reasonable belief and proportionality apply. The defender cannot use more force than is necessary and reasonable to protect the other person. Defense of Property. Definition and Elements: This defense allows individuals to use reasonable force to protect their property from theft, destruction, or trespass. Restrictions: Generally, the use of deadly force to protect property alone is not justified. The circumstances must indicate that the force was necessary to prevent a serious crime or protect human life. 2. Excuses: Insanity, Intoxication, Infancy, Duress, Mistake of Fact or Law. Excuse defenses argue that the defendant should not be held fully responsible due to a personal condition or circumstance at the time of the crime. Insanity. Legal Insanity: This is a defense based on the idea that, at the time of the crime, the defendant was suffering from a severe mental illness and was unable to understand the nature of their actions or distinguish right from wrong. Tests for Insanity: Different jurisdictions use different tests for insanity, including the M'Naghten Rule (focusing on the defendant's ability to understand the nature of the act), the Irresistible Impulse Test (inability to control actions), and the Model Penal Code's substantial capacity test. Intoxication. Voluntary Intoxication: Generally, voluntary intoxication is not a defense to most crimes. However, if a specific intent is an element of the crime, and the intoxication prevents the formation of such intent, it may be a valid defense. Involuntary Intoxication: If the intoxication is involuntary, it can be a defense if it prevents the defendant from having the requisite mental state for the crime. Infancy. Definition and Application: This defense is based on the age of the defendant. Children under a certain age (usually 7 or 10) are presumed incapable of committing a crime as they cannot form the necessary mens rea. Duress. Definition and Elements: Duress is a defense where the defendant argues that they committed the crime because they were threatened with immediate harm to themselves or others. It must be shown that the threat was of such severity that a reasonable person would have succumbed to it. Mistake of Fact or Law. Mistake of Fact: This defense applies when the defendant makes an honest and reasonable mistake about a factual matter, leading them to believe their actions were not criminal. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Section 4: Discovery. Discovery is a critical phase in civil litigation, where parties exchange information relevant to the case. This stage is designed to eliminate surprises, clarify what the lawsuit is about, and gather evidence necessary for trial. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and corresponding state rules provide the framework for discovery. Scope and Limits of Discovery. Under Rule 26(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the scope of discovery is broad. Parties may obtain discovery regarding any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to any party's claim or defense and proportional to the needs of the case. The information sought need not be admissible in evidence if it appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. However, the scope of discovery is not limitless. The concept of proportionality, introduced in the 2015 amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, plays a crucial role. Proportionality limits discovery requests that are overly burdensome, unnecessary, or disproportionate to the case's needs. Factors considered in assessing proportionality include the importance of the issues at stake, the amount in controversy, the parties' relative access to relevant information, the parties' resources, the importance of the discovery in resolving the issues, and whether the burden or expense of the proposed discovery outweighs its likely benefit. Discovery Tools. Interrogatories: These are written questions one party sends to another, requiring answers under oath. Interrogatories are useful for obtaining basic information like names, dates, and details of the case. However, they are limited in number (usually to 25) and scope. Depositions: A deposition is an out-of-court testimony given under oath by a party or witness. It allows attorneys to question the deponent (the person being deposed) in person and assess their demeanor and credibility. Depositions are powerful tools for gathering information and locking in testimony before trial. Requests for Production (RFPs): Parties can request documents, electronic data, and other tangible evidence from each other. RFPs are broad in scope and can include requests for emails, documents, internal memos, and physical evidence relevant to the dispute. Requests for Admissions: These are statements sent to the opposing party to admit or deny specific assertions. They are used to establish certain facts as true for the purpose of trial, thereby narrowing the issues to be litigated. Physical and Mental Examinations: In certain cases, a party may request the court to order a physical or mental examination of a person if the person’s condition is in controversy. Electronic Discovery (e-Discovery). Electronic discovery refers to the process of identifying, collecting, and producing electronically stored information (ESI) in response to a request for production in litigation. ESI includes emails, documents, databases, voicemails, audio and video files, social media posts, and more. The challenges of e-discovery are manifold. First, the sheer volume of ESI can be overwhelming. Second, ESI is dynamic and can be altered, deleted, or lost, making preservation crucial. Third, ESI is often stored in complex systems, requiring technical expertise to retrieve. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure address e-discovery specifically. Rule 26(f), known as the "meet and confer" provision, requires parties to discuss e-discovery issues early in the litigation. Rule 34 allows for the request of ESI in specific forms. And Rule 37(e) provides guidance on the failure to preserve ESI, outlining measures a court may take if ESI that should have been preserved is lost. Discovery Disputes and Resolutions. Discovery disputes are common and can arise over the scope of discovery, the protection of privileged information, the format of production, and the burden or expense of the requested discovery. Strategies to resolve these disputes include: --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

The Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights, the first ten amendments to the Constitution, was ratified in 1791. This addition was largely a response to calls from the Anti-Federalists, who feared that the new Constitution did not sufficiently protect individual liberties. First Amendment: It guarantees freedoms concerning religion, expression, assembly, and the right to petition. It forbids Congress from both promoting one religion over others and restricting an individual's religious practices. It guarantees freedom of expression by prohibiting Congress from restricting the press or the rights of individuals to speak freely. Second Amendment: This amendment protects the right to keep and bear arms. Its interpretation, particularly regarding individual rights versus militia membership, has been a subject of intense debate and legal scrutiny. Third Amendment: Often overlooked, this amendment prohibits the quartering of soldiers in private homes without the owner's consent, addressing grievances from the colonial era. Fourth Amendment: It affords citizens the right against unreasonable searches and seizures. This right is crucial in criminal law, shaping legal doctrines on privacy and law enforcement procedures. Fifth Amendment: It sets out rights regarding criminal proceedings, guarantees the right to a grand jury, forbids “double jeopardy,” and protects against self-incrimination. It also requires due process of law and mandates compensation for the seizure of private property under eminent domain. Sixth Amendment: This amendment outlines rights related to criminal prosecutions, including the right to a speedy and public trial, the right to a lawyer, the right to an impartial jury, and the right to know who your accusers are and the nature of the charges and evidence against you. Seventh Amendment: It provides for the right to trial by jury in certain civil cases, according to common law. Eighth Amendment: It prohibits excessive fines and excessive bail, as well as cruel and unusual punishment. Ninth Amendment: This amendment declares that rights not specifically mentioned in the Constitution still belong to the people. This has been the basis for the broad reading of constitutional rights. Tenth Amendment: It provides the principle of federalism by stating that the federal government possesses only those powers delegated to it by the Constitution. All remaining powers are reserved for the states or the people. The Fourteenth Amendment (Due Process and Equal Protection). Citizenship Clause: It provides a broad definition of citizenship, nullifying the Dred Scott v Sandford ruling that had excluded African Americans. Privileges or Immunities Clause: This clause has been interpreted in various ways but traditionally was seen as protecting citizens' rights from state infringement. Due Process Clause: It prohibits states from depriving any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. This clause has been used to apply most of the Bill of Rights to the states. Equal Protection Clause: It requires each state to provide equal protection under the law to all people within its jurisdiction. This clause has been the basis for many of the Supreme Court’s decisions on civil rights, including Brown v Board of Education (1954), which declared racial segregation in public schools unconstitutional. First Amendment Freedoms (Speech, Religion, Assembly, Press). Second Amendment and Gun Control. The right to bear arms, protected by the Second Amendment, has been subject to extensive legal and political debate. The Supreme Court, in District of Columbia v Heller (2008), held that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess a firearm for lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. However, this right is not unlimited and does not prohibit all forms of gun control or regulation. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

1. Mistake. Unilateral and Mutual Mistake. A mistake can significantly impact the validity of a contract. It refers to a belief that is not in accord with existing facts. Mistakes can be categorized into two types: Unilateral Mistake: This occurs when one party is mistaken about a material fact regarding the contract. Generally, a unilateral mistake does not render a contract voidable unless the other party knew or should have known of the mistake or if the mistake was due to a mathematical error made inadvertently and without gross negligence. Raffles v Wichelhaus (1864), known as the "Peerless" case, is a classic example of a mutual mistake where both parties had a different understanding of the contract's subject matter. Mutual Mistake. Mutual Mistake: This happens when both parties have a mistaken belief about a basic assumption on which the contract is based. If the mistake significantly impacts the agreed-upon exchange, the contract may be voidable by the adversely affected party. Sherwood v Walker (1887): In this case, a mutual mistake about the fertility of a cow led to the contract being voidable. 2. Misrepresentation and Nondisclosure. Misrepresentation occurs when a false statement of past or present fact is made, causing the other party to enter into the contract. Fraudulent Misrepresentation: This involves intentional deceit for personal gain. The elements include a false statement of material fact, knowledge or belief that the statement is false, an intention to induce the other party to act, justifiable reliance by the deceived party, and damages resulting from the deception. Negligent Misrepresentation: This occurs when the party making the statement should have known it was false. Innocent Misrepresentation: This involves a false statement made without knowledge of its falsity but with due care. It allows for rescission of the contract but not damages. Nondisclosure can sometimes equate to misrepresentation, especially in cases where disclosure is necessary to correct a previous assertion, where one party knows the other party is under a mistaken belief, or in a relationship of trust and confidence. 3. Duress and Undue Influence. Duress involves coercion by physical or economic threat, rendering the agreement voidable. Elements of Duress: The elements include a threat to harm or exert improper pressure, a lack of reasonable alternative for the threatened party, and the threat actually induces the contract. Remedies: The primary remedy for duress is rescission of the contract. Undue Influence occurs when one party takes advantage of a position of power over another person, unduly persuading them to enter into a contract. Elements of Undue Influence: This includes a relationship between the parties either of trust or where one party is dominant, and the dominant party uses this position to unfairly persuade the other party. Remedies: Like duress, the main remedy is rescission. 4. Unconscionability. A contract is unconscionable when it is so one-sided that it is oppressive or unfairly prejudicial to one party. Procedural Unconscionability: This involves unfairness in the bargaining process, such as a lack of negotiation opportunity, hidden terms, or a significant imbalance in the parties' bargaining power. Substantive Unconscionability: This refers to the terms of the contract itself being excessively unfair or one-sided. Williams v Walker-Thomas Furniture Co. (1965): This case illustrates substantive unconscionability, where a contract included a highly unfavorable term that was enforced in a manner that was considered unconscionable. In contracts law, defenses play a critical role in ensuring that agreements are entered into freely and fairly. Understanding these defenses, their elements, and their remedies is crucial for any aspiring attorney. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Miranda Rights. Miranda v Arizona. The case of Miranda v Arizona (1966) is a cornerstone of criminal procedure law. This landmark decision led to the establishment of what are now known as Miranda rights. Key Aspects: Ernesto Miranda was arrested and interrogated without being informed of his right to counsel and his right against self-incrimination. The Supreme Court ruled that the Fifth Amendment's protection against self-incrimination extends to the police interrogation process. Custodial Interrogation. The Miranda rights apply during a custodial interrogation, which occurs when a person is in custody and subjected to direct or indirect questioning. Understanding Custodial Interrogation: In Custody: Not necessarily formal arrest; it can be any situation where a reasonable person would feel they are not free to leave. Interrogation: Includes both express questioning and any actions or words that the police should know are reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response. Waiver of Rights. An individual can waive their Miranda rights, but the waiver must be voluntary, knowing, and intelligent. Criteria for a Valid Waiver: Voluntary: Free from coercion or intimidation. Knowing and Intelligent: The individual must understand the nature of the rights and the consequences of abandoning them. Double Jeopardy. Concept and Scope. The principle of double jeopardy, as part of the Fifth Amendment, protects individuals from being tried twice for the same offense after either an acquittal or a conviction. Key Elements: Same Offense: The prohibition applies to the same offense, not separate acts that may be part of a broader criminal scheme. Acquittal or Conviction: Once acquitted or convicted, a person cannot be retried for the same offense. Exceptions and Special Cases. There are exceptions to the double jeopardy rule: Separate Sovereigns: The doctrine allows state and federal courts to try the same person for the same conduct under state and federal law, respectively. Mistrials: If a mistrial occurs, particularly if the defendant requests it, retrial is typically permitted. Appeals: If a conviction is overturned on appeal, retrial is not considered double jeopardy. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

1. Principal Actors: Principals and Accomplices. In criminal law, parties to a crime are classified based on their level of involvement in the commission of the crime. This classification is important because it determines the extent of each party's criminal liability. Principals. Definition and Role: A principal is the primary actor in the commission of a crime, the person who actually performs the act constituting the offense. Principals are often the most directly involved and are usually present at the scene of the crime. Types of Principals: Traditionally, principals are categorized into first and second degree. The first degree includes those who actually perform the criminal act, while the second degree encompasses those who aid, command, or encourage the principal and are present during the crime. Liability of Principals: Principals are fully liable for the crimes they commit. Their intent and actions are directly scrutinized in determining their guilt. Accomplices. Definition and Role: Accomplices are individuals who assist in the commission of a crime but are not the primary actors. They might provide help, encouragement, or support to the principal. Liability of Accomplices: Accomplices are usually liable to the same extent as the principal. This means they face the same charges and penalties as the person who actually commits the crime, as long as it can be proven that they had the intent to assist and did indeed assist in the crime. Mens Rea of Accomplices: An accomplice must have the requisite mens rea, or guilty mind, to be criminally liable. They must intentionally aid or encourage the principal in the commission of the crime. Actus Reus of Accomplices: The actus reus, or guilty act, for an accomplice, is their action in aiding, abetting, or facilitating the crime. This could include providing tools, planning the crime, or helping to hide evidence. 2. Accessory After the Fact. Definition and Role: An accessory after the fact is a person who assists the principal or an accomplice after the crime has been committed. Their assistance usually involves helping the principal or accomplice escape arrest, trial, or conviction. Liability of Accessory After the Fact: The liability of an accessory after the fact is generally less than that of the principal or accomplice. This is because their involvement does not directly contribute to the commission of the crime but rather assists after the fact. Elements of Being an Accessory After the Fact: The essential elements include knowledge that a crime has been committed and some act of assistance or support to the principal or accomplice with the intent to hinder or prevent their arrest, trial, or punishment. 3. Inchoate Offenses: Attempt, Conspiracy, and Solicitation. Inchoate offenses are crimes that involve taking steps toward committing a crime but not completing the crime itself. These are critical in criminal law as they aim to prevent crimes before they occur. Attempt. Definition and Elements: An attempt to commit a crime involves a person taking substantial steps towards committing a crime but failing to complete it. The key elements are intent to commit the crime and taking a direct, ineffectual act towards its completion. Legal Tests for Attempt: Courts use various tests to determine whether an individual's actions constitute an attempt. These include the proximity test (how close the person came to completing the crime), the unequivocality test (whether the person's actions unequivocally demonstrate the intent to commit the crime), and the substantial step test (whether the actions taken are substantial steps towards committing the crime). Conspiracy. Definition and Elements: Conspiracy involves an agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime. The essential elements are an agreement to commit the crime and an intent to enter into this agreement. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Copyright law, at its core, is about protection and balance. It’s the legal framework that safeguards authors' and creators' rights while ensuring that the public can benefit from these works. As future lawyers, understanding this balance is key to navigating legal challenges in the creative world. Definition and Purpose of Copyright Law. Let's start with the basics. What is copyright? In legal terms, copyright is a right granted by law to the creators of original works of authorship. This includes literary, dramatic, musical, artistic works, and certain other intellectual creations. This right allows creators to control and derive financial benefit from their work, typically for the duration of their lifetime plus a period of years after their death. The purpose of copyright law is twofold. Firstly, it encourages creativity and the production of original works by ensuring creators can profit from their efforts. Secondly, it contributes to the cultural and educational enrichment of society by allowing these works to be accessible to the public after the copyright term. Legal Basis of Copyright. The legal foundation of copyright law in the United States is enshrined in the U.S. Constitution. Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 empowers Congress “To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.” This clause, known as the Copyright Clause, is the bedrock of all U.S. copyright legislation. Types of Works Protected. Copyright law protects a diverse range of works. This includes literary works like novels and poems; dramatic works including plays and screenplays; musical works; artistic works such as paintings, sculptures, and photographs; and certain types of technological works. However, the key criterion is originality – the work must originate from the author and possess a minimal degree of creativity. Formalities and Registration. Historically, copyright law required formalities like registration and use of the © symbol. However, since the Berne Convention Implementation Act of 1988, these are no longer mandatory for copyright protection. Nevertheless, registering a copyright offers significant advantages, including public record of ownership and eligibility for statutory damages and attorney's fees in infringement lawsuits. Rights Conferred by Copyright. Copyright grants several exclusive rights to the owner. These include the right to reproduce the work, distribute copies, perform the work publicly, display the work publicly, and make derivative works. These rights enable creators to control how their work is used and monetized, forming the basis for copyright infringement claims. Limitations and Exceptions. Now, let’s talk about the limitations to copyright. One of the most important is the doctrine of fair use, which allows for limited use of copyrighted material without permission for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research. Determining fair use involves a complex analysis, a crucial aspect for any lawyer practicing in this field. Infringement and Remedies. Copyright infringement occurs when someone violates any of the exclusive rights granted to the copyright holder. The law provides various remedies for infringement, including injunctions to prevent further violations, and monetary damages to compensate for losses. In some cases, statutory damages can be awarded, which do not require proof of actual loss. Digital Issues and Recent Developments. In our digital age, copyright faces new challenges. Issues like digital rights management, online piracy, and the impact of social media are at the forefront. Keeping abreast of recent legal developments in this area is vital, as the digital landscape continuously reshapes the way copyright law is applied and interpreted. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

The Three Branches of Government. The Constitution establishes a tripartite system of government, each branch with its distinct functions but interdependent on the others. Legislative Branch (Congress). The legislative branch, embodied by Congress, is vested with the power to make laws. It consists of two chambers: the House of Representatives and the Senate. The House is based on population representation, whereas the Senate represents states equally. Congress's powers are extensive, including the authority to levy taxes, regulate commerce, declare war, and make all laws "necessary and proper" for executing its powers. However, its functions are not unlimited. For instance, Congress cannot pass ex post facto laws or bills of attainder and must adhere to constitutional rights and principles. Executive Branch (President and Federal Agencies). The executive branch is headed by the President, who holds the office for a four-year term. The President's primary role is to enforce and implement federal laws. This role includes commanding the armed forces, negotiating treaties (subject to Senate ratification), appointing federal officers and judges (with Senate approval), and ensuring the laws are faithfully executed. The President also has the power to veto legislation, although Congress can override this veto with a two-thirds majority in both chambers. Judiciary (Courts). The judicial branch, led by the Supreme Court, is responsible for interpreting laws and adjudicating legal disputes. Its authority extends to cases arising under the Constitution, federal laws, treaties, maritime law, controversies to which the United States is a party, and between states or citizens of different states. The judiciary's role in reviewing the constitutionality of legislative and executive actions (judicial review) is a critical aspect of its function, ensuring that all government actions comply with the Constitution. Checks and Balances. The system of checks and balances is integral to preventing any branch from gaining excessive power. This system ensures cooperation and competition among the branches, each with mechanisms to limit the others' powers. Congress's Checks. Congress can check the executive by overriding presidential vetoes, impeaching and removing the President or other high officials, and controlling appropriations and budgetary matters. It also has the power to confirm presidential appointments and ratify treaties. Judicial appointments are subject to Senate confirmation, allowing Congress a say in the composition of the federal judiciary. Additionally, Congress can propose constitutional amendments and legislate to structure and limit the federal courts' jurisdiction. Presidential Checks. The President can check Congress through the veto power, influencing the legislative process. The President also has the authority to appoint federal judges, including Supreme Court Justices, shaping the judiciary's ideological balance. Judicial Checks. The judiciary can check both the legislative and executive branches through judicial review, declaring laws or executive actions unconstitutional. This power, though not explicitly stated in the Constitution, was established in Marbury v Madison and has been a fundamental aspect of judicial authority. Executive Power and Authority. Presidential powers are both broad and subject to checks. The President's role as commander-in-chief, while giving significant control over the military, does not extend to declaring war - a power reserved for Congress. The power to make treaties and appoint officials, while pivotal in foreign policy and government administration, requires the advice and consent of the Senate. The President's power to issue executive orders, which direct the operations of the federal government, is a significant tool in shaping policy. However, these orders must be grounded in the Constitution or statutory authority and are subject to judicial review. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Definition of a Contract. "At its core, a contract is a legally enforceable agreement between two or more parties, with each party having specific obligations. Take, for example, buying a car. You agree to pay a certain amount, and the seller agrees to deliver the car in a specified condition. This mutual agreement creates a contract. But it's not just about signing a document; a contract can be as simple as buying a coffee or as complex as a multinational business agreement." Historical Development. "Tracing back to ancient times, contracts have evolved from simple verbal agreements and handshakes to intricate legal documents. The Roman concept of 'pacta sunt servanda', meaning agreements must be kept, laid the groundwork for modern contract law. Over centuries, legal systems have refined the principles governing contracts, making them more equitable and adaptable to changing societal needs. Understanding this evolution helps us appreciate the principles that govern contracts today." Overview of Sales Law. "Sales law, a subset of contract law, specifically deals with the buying and selling of goods. It's governed largely by the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) in the United States, which standardizes commercial transactions. Whether it’s purchasing a smartphone or trading in the stock market, sales law regulates these transactions, ensuring fairness and predictability. By understanding sales law, you unlock the legal intricacies of commerce, an essential skill for any aspiring lawyer." Conclusion. "As we dive deeper into Contracts and Sales in upcoming episodes, remember that these aren't just abstract legal theories. They're practical tools that shape our world. Understanding them is not just crucial for the Bar Exam but for navigating the complex web of agreements that bind our society. Stay tuned as we unravel these concepts further, and prepare to empower yourself with knowledge that's key to both legal success and everyday life." --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Pleadings and Pretrial Procedures. Complaints and Answers. Pleadings are formal documents filed with the court that outline the parties' primary claims and defenses. They set the stage for the litigation and define the scope of the dispute. Complaints. The complaint is the initial pleading filed by the plaintiff, which starts the lawsuit. It serves several key purposes: Statement of Jurisdiction: The complaint must explain why the court has jurisdiction to hear the case. Allegation of Facts: It should contain a clear and concise statement of the facts, laying out the plaintiff's case. Each fact must be alleged in a separate paragraph. Claims or Causes of Action: The complaint should articulate the legal theories under which the plaintiff seeks relief. Each claim should be stated separately. Demand for Relief: It concludes with a demand for judgment or relief, which may include monetary damages, injunctive relief, or declaratory judgment. Answers. The answer is the defendant's response to the complaint. It must be filed within a specific time frame, usually 21 days if the defendant is served within the United States. The answer serves several purposes: Responding to Allegations: The defendant must admit, deny, or state that they lack knowledge to respond to each allegation in the complaint. Asserting Defenses: The answer can include any defenses to the plaintiff's claims, such as statute of limitations, lack of jurisdiction, or failure to state a claim. Counterclaims and Crossclaims: The defendant may also raise counterclaims against the plaintiff or crossclaims against co-defendants. Motions. Motions are requests made to the court asking for a specific order or ruling. They are a critical aspect of pretrial procedures. Motion to Dismiss. A Motion to Dismiss, under Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, asks the court to dismiss the case for specified reasons, such as: Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction: Arguing that the court does not have the authority to hear the case. Lack of Personal Jurisdiction: Claiming that the court does not have power over the defendant. Improper Venue: Asserting that the case is in the wrong court location. Failure to State a Claim: Arguing that even if all the allegations are true, the law does not provide a remedy. If a Motion to Dismiss is granted, the plaintiff may be allowed to amend the complaint to address the deficiencies. Motion for Summary Judgment. A Motion for Summary Judgment, under Rule 56, is filed when one party believes that there are no material facts in dispute and that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. This motion can be filed by either the plaintiff or the defendant and is often submitted after discovery. The court will grant a summary judgment if the moving party demonstrates that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Amendments and Rule 11 Sanctions. Amendments. Under Rule 15, parties are allowed to amend their pleadings to correct errors, add claims or defenses, or respond to developments in the case. Amendments must be made with the court's permission and the opposing party's consent, especially if made after certain deadlines. Rule 11 Sanctions. Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ensures that pleadings, motions, and other papers are filed for proper purposes and have a legal basis. Under Rule 11, when an attorney or party submits a pleading, they certify that: The Document is Not for Improper Purpose: Such as harassment, unnecessary delay, or needless increase in the cost of litigation. Legal Contentions are Warranted: The claims, defenses, and other legal contentions are warranted by existing law or a non-frivolous argument for modifying the law. Factual Contentions and Denials: The factual contentions have or will likely have evidentiary support. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Welcome to Module 2, where we delve into the intricacies of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. This amendment forms the cornerstone of privacy rights and protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. We will explore the concept of reasonable expectation of privacy, the requirements and processes for obtaining search warrants, exceptions to these requirements, the legalities of stop and frisk procedures, and the important principles of the exclusionary rule and the Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Doctrine. Let's begin. Search and Seizure. Reasonable Expectation of Privacy. The Fourth Amendment protects individuals against unreasonable searches and seizures. Central to this protection is the concept of a “reasonable expectation of privacy.” This expectation exists when: An individual exhibits an actual (subjective) expectation of privacy; and Society is prepared to recognize that expectation as reasonable (objective). Illustrations of Reasonable Expectation of Privacy: In one’s home, personal property, or private communications. In enclosed spaces like dressing rooms or private offices. In personal data stored on electronic devices. Cases Illustrating Expectation of Privacy: Katz v. United States: The Supreme Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment protected a person’s conversations in a public phone booth. Carpenter v. United States: The court recognized a reasonable expectation of privacy in the location data of a person’s cell phone. Warrant Requirements. A search warrant is a legal document authorized by a judge or magistrate, allowing law enforcement to conduct a search of a specific place for specific items. The Process and Legal Standards: Probable Cause: The officer must show probable cause, a reasonable basis to believe that a crime has been committed and that evidence relevant to the crime is likely to be found in the place to be searched. Sworn Affidavit: The officer must provide a sworn statement detailing the facts that establish probable cause. Specificity: The warrant must specify the location to be searched and the items to be seized. Judicial Approval: A neutral and detached judge or magistrate must review the affidavit and issue the warrant. Exceptions to the Warrant Requirement. There are several situations where law enforcement can conduct searches without a warrant: Consent: If a person voluntarily consents to a search. Plain View Doctrine: If the evidence is in plain sight of an officer legally present at the scene. Search Incident to Lawful Arrest: If a search is conducted immediately following a lawful arrest. Exigent Circumstances: In situations requiring immediate action, such as to prevent harm or the destruction of evidence. Automobile Exception: Due to the mobile nature of vehicles, searches may be conducted with probable cause but without a warrant. Stop and Frisk. Terry Stops. A Terry stop, named after the landmark case Terry v. Ohio, allows police to briefly detain a person based on reasonable suspicion of involvement in criminal activity. Legal Basis and Requirements: Reasonable Suspicion: A standard less than probable cause, based on specific and articulable facts. Limited Scope: The stop should be brief and limited to the purpose of confirming or dispelling the officer’s suspicions. Pat-Down for Weapons: If the officer reasonably believes the person is armed and dangerous, a pat-down for weapons is allowed. Reasonable Suspicion. Reasonable suspicion is a legal standard, lower than probable cause, that is based on specific, articulable facts and rational inferences. Examples of Reasonable Suspicion: A person matching the description of a suspect in a recent crime. Evasive or unusual behavior under certain circumstances. Visible indications of illegal activity. Exclusionary Rule and Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Doctrine. Development and Application. The exclusionary rule prevents evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment from being used in court. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Actus Reus (Guilty Act). Let's begin with the concept of actus reus, or the guilty act. In criminal law, for a behavior to be considered criminal, there must first be an act or conduct that is prohibited by law. Actus reus is not just about doing something but can also involve failing to act when there's a legal duty to do so. This could be a duty established by law, such as the duty to file taxes, or a duty that arises out of a specific relationship, like a parent's duty to care for their child. A fundamental principle here is that the act must be voluntary. Involuntary actions, such as movements made while asleep or unconscious, do not constitute actus reus. For instance, if someone commits what would ordinarily be a criminal act while sleepwalking, they have not performed an actus reus in the eyes of the law. It's important to distinguish between an act itself and the result of the act. For many crimes, the actus reus includes not only the act but also a specific result (like death in the case of murder). In such cases, the prosecution must prove both the act and the result to establish the actus reus. Mens Rea (Guilty Mind). Moving on to mens rea, or the guilty mind. This is about the defendant's mental state at the time of the act. The law recognizes different levels of mens rea, from intentional acts to reckless and negligent behavior. For many crimes, establishing mens rea is critical to proving guilt. Intention: The highest level of mens rea is intention, where the defendant has a specific aim or purpose to cause a particular result. Knowledge: This is where the defendant knows that their actions are almost certain to bring about a particular result. Recklessness: A person acts recklessly when they consciously disregard a substantial and unjustifiable risk. Negligence: This involves failing to be aware of a substantial and unjustifiable risk where such failure is a deviation from the standard of care a reasonable person would observe. Understanding the nuances of mens rea is essential because different crimes require different mental states. For example, first-degree murder requires intent, whereas manslaughter might only require recklessness or negligence. Strict Liability Crimes. Now, let's talk about strict liability crimes. These are offenses where mens rea is not a required element. The mere act of doing the prohibited act (actus reus) is enough to establish criminal liability. Common examples include traffic offenses and statutory rape. In these cases, the focus is on preventing certain actions, and the law does not concern itself with the actor's state of mind. Strict liability is controversial because it can lead to punishment without proof of a guilty mind. However, these crimes are typically less serious and carry lighter sentences. Causation: Factual and Legal. Finally, we come to causation. In criminal law, it's not enough to prove that the defendant committed the act and had the requisite mental state. The prosecution must also show that the defendant's actions caused the criminal result. This involves two types of causation: factual and legal. Factual Causation: This is often established by the "but for" test. But for the defendant's actions, would the result have occurred? If the answer is no, factual causation is established. Legal Causation: This is more complex. Here, the question is whether the defendant's actions were a substantial factor in bringing about the result. This involves looking at foreseeability and whether there were any intervening acts that broke the chain of causation. An important aspect of legal causation is the concept of foreseeability. The result must be a foreseeable outcome of the defendant's actions. If an unforeseeable event intervenes and is the primary cause of the result, the defendant may not be held legally responsible. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Subject Matter Jurisdiction. Subject matter jurisdiction refers to a court's authority to hear a case based on the nature of the dispute. It's a threshold issue that determines whether a court can adjudicate a particular matter. There are two primary forms of subject matter jurisdiction: federal jurisdiction and state jurisdiction. Federal and State Jurisdiction. Federal jurisdiction pertains to cases involving federal laws, treaties, or the US Constitution. Federal courts also hear cases where the United States government is a party. The authority of federal courts is derived from Article III of the Constitution and various federal statutes. State jurisdiction, on the other hand, is much broader. State courts typically handle cases involving state laws, including family law, real estate, probate, and most contract and tort cases. State courts can also hear cases involving federal law, provided they don't exclusively fall under federal jurisdiction. A key aspect of subject matter jurisdiction is that it cannot be waived or consented to by the parties. If a court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, any judgment or order it issues is void. Federal Question Jurisdiction. Federal question jurisdiction exists when a plaintiff's claim arises under federal law. This concept is rooted in Article III, Section 2 of the US Constitution and is codified in 28 USC § 1331. A case can be brought in federal court if it involves the interpretation or application of a federal statute, a constitutional issue, or a federal treaty. The 'well-pleaded complaint' rule is central to federal question jurisdiction. This rule stipulates that the federal question must be present in the plaintiff's original complaint; it cannot be based solely on a potential defense or a counterclaim. Diversity Jurisdiction. Diversity jurisdiction, as outlined in 28 USC § 1332, gives federal courts the authority to hear cases where the parties are citizens of different states or a foreign country and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. This type of jurisdiction aims to provide a neutral forum for parties from different states or countries. For diversity purposes, a party's citizenship is determined by their domicile, not merely their residence. Corporations are considered citizens of both the state where they are incorporated and the state where they have their principal place of business. Supplemental Jurisdiction. Supplemental jurisdiction allows federal courts to hear additional claims that are related to those within their original jurisdiction, even if the related claims would not independently qualify for federal jurisdiction. Codified in 28 USC § 1367, this concept is grounded in judicial efficiency, allowing related claims to be heard in a single proceeding. Supplemental jurisdiction applies when the additional claims share a "common nucleus of operative fact" with the claims that invoked original federal jurisdiction. However, courts have discretion to reject supplemental jurisdiction if it would overshadow the original basis for jurisdiction or raise complex state law issues. Personal Jurisdiction. Personal jurisdiction refers to a court's power over the parties involved in the litigation. Without personal jurisdiction, a court cannot bind a party to its decisions. Traditional Basis of Personal Jurisdiction. Historically, courts could establish personal jurisdiction over a defendant if they were physically present in the state, domiciled in the state, or had consented to the jurisdiction. These traditional bases ensured that defendants had a clear connection to the state where the court was located. Long-arm statutes enable courts to reach beyond their state's borders to exercise jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants. These statutes vary by state but generally allow courts to assert jurisdiction over non-residents who have certain types of contacts with the state, such as committing a tortious act within the state or doing business in the state. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

The Powers of Congress (Commerce Clause, Taxing, and Spending Powers). Commerce Clause. The Commerce Clause, found in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution, grants Congress the power to "regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes." This clause has been a cornerstone for expanding federal legislative power. Historically, its interpretation has varied from narrow in the early 19th century to expansive during the New Deal era and beyond. Key cases like Gibbons v Ogden (1824) and Wickard v Filburn (1942) demonstrate the evolving nature of Commerce Clause jurisprudence. In Gibbons, the Supreme Court established that federal power over interstate commerce was plenary, overriding state laws that interfered with it. Wickard significantly broadened this interpretation, holding that even activities seemingly local in nature could affect interstate commerce and thus fall under federal regulation. Taxing and Spending Powers. Congress also wields substantial power through its ability to tax and spend for the "general Welfare" (Article 1, Section 8). This power, while ostensibly straightforward, has profound implications for national policy and governance. In cases like United States v Butler (1936), the Supreme Court recognized Congress's broad discretion in taxing and spending to promote the general welfare. However, it also underscored that such powers must not contravene other constitutional provisions. The Affordable Care Act (ACA), particularly the case National Federation of Independent Business v Sebelius (2012), is a contemporary example where the taxing power played a key role. The Supreme Court upheld the ACA's individual mandate, characterizing it as a tax and thus within Congress's constitutional authority. The Tenth Amendment and State Powers. The Tenth Amendment is crucial in maintaining the federal balance. It states: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." This amendment emphasizes the principle of reserved powers, ensuring that states retain a significant sphere of autonomy. The interpretation and application of the Tenth Amendment have been central in cases dealing with the limits of federal power. In New York v United States (1992), the Supreme Court ruled that Congress could not compel states to enact or enforce a federal regulatory program, underscoring state sovereignty. Similarly, Printz v United States (1997) affirmed that the federal government could not commandeer state officers to implement federal laws. The Dormant Commerce Clause. The Dormant Commerce Clause is an inferred principle from the Commerce Clause, suggesting that in granting Congress power over interstate commerce, the Constitution implicitly restricts states from passing legislation that interferes with or discriminates against interstate commerce. This doctrine plays a critical role in maintaining an open national market, free from parochial state interests. Cases like Cooley v Board of Wardens of Port of Philadelphia (1852) and South Dakota v Wayfair, Inc. (2018) illustrate the Court's approach to balancing state interests against the need for a uniform national economy. Wayfair, in particular, marked a significant shift, allowing states to require out-of-state sellers to collect and remit sales tax, reflecting the realities of the modern digital economy. Intergovernmental Immunities. Intergovernmental immunities encompass doctrines that prevent the federal and state governments from encroaching on each other's essential functions. This concept, though not explicitly outlined in the Constitution, is derived from the federal structure itself. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Third-Party Beneficiaries. Introduction to Third-Party Beneficiaries. In contract law, a third-party beneficiary is an individual or entity who benefits from a contract between two other parties but is not one of the contracting parties themselves. The distinction between intended and incidental beneficiaries is critical: Intended Beneficiary: Someone the contract was specifically designed to benefit, giving them the legal right to enforce the contract. Incidental Beneficiary: Someone who benefits from the contract indirectly but has no legal right to enforce it. Rights of Intended Beneficiaries. Understanding the rights and obligations of intended third-party beneficiaries is crucial: Enforcement Rights: Intended beneficiaries typically have the right to enforce the contract and seek remedies for breach. Defenses: Contracting parties can raise defenses against intended beneficiaries if those defenses align with the parties' agreement. Landmark Case: Lawrence v Fox (1859). In Lawrence v Fox, the court recognized the rights of intended third-party beneficiaries. The case involved a contract for the sale of a horse between A and B, with the understanding that the horse would be delivered to C. C was considered an intended beneficiary and could enforce the contract. Privity of Contract. Understanding the concept of privity of contract is essential for comprehending third-party beneficiary rights: Traditional Rule: Privity traditionally held that only parties in a direct contractual relationship could enforce or be held liable under the contract. Departure with Third-Party Beneficiaries: The recognition of third-party beneficiaries represents a departure from the privity doctrine. Assignment of Contractual Rights and Delegation of Duties. Assignment of Contractual Rights. Assigning contractual rights involves transferring one's rights under a contract to another party, known as the assignee: Requirements for Valid Assignment: Generally requires a written agreement, an intention to make the assignment, and notification to the other party. Rights of the Assignee: Once rights are assigned, the assignee typically has the right to enforce those rights against the obligor. Revocability: Assignments are often revocable unless they are accompanied by consideration or are expressly irrevocable. Delegation of Duties. Delegating duties involves transferring one's obligations under a contract to another party, known as the delegatee: Requirements for Valid Delegation: A valid delegation does not significantly change the obligor's duties and does not violate the terms of the contract. Liability of the Delegator: The delegator remains liable to the original obligee unless the contract expressly releases them from liability. Novation. Novation involves substituting a new party for one of the original parties to the contract, with the consent of all parties involved: Discharging the Original Party: In a novation, the original party is discharged from their obligations, and the new party assumes them. Conclusion. A comprehensive understanding of third-party beneficiary rights and the assignment of contractual rights and delegation of duties is vital for law students and legal practitioners. By recognizing when third-party beneficiaries have enforceable rights, understanding the principles of valid assignments and delegations, and grasping the concept of novation, students and lawyers can provide valuable legal counsel in complex contract-related matters. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Welcome to Module 1 of our course on Criminal Procedure. In this module, we'll delve into the intricacies of the criminal justice system, its structure, and function, and the vital role the Constitution plays in shaping criminal procedure. We'll also explore the various sources of criminal procedure law, including constitutional provisions, statutes, and case law. Let’s begin. Overview of the Criminal Justice System. Structure and Function. The criminal justice system in the United States is a complex network designed to uphold law and order, protect the rights of individuals, and ensure justice is served. It consists of three main components: law enforcement, the judiciary, and corrections. Law Enforcement: These are the agencies responsible for the enforcement of laws and maintenance of public order. This includes local police departments, sheriffs' offices, and federal agencies like the FBI. Their primary role is to investigate crimes, apprehend suspects, and provide evidence for prosecution. The Judiciary: This branch interprets the law and administers justice. It includes various levels of courts - from local courts to the Supreme Court. The judiciary is responsible for ensuring trials are fair and rights are protected, interpreting laws, sentencing convicted offenders, and reviewing cases on appeal. Corrections: This component deals with the management of individuals who have been convicted. It includes jails, prisons, probation, and parole systems. Corrections aim to rehabilitate offenders and prepare them for reintegration into society. The Role of the Constitution The Constitution is the supreme law of the land, providing the framework for our criminal justice system. It safeguards individual liberties and ensures protection against arbitrary state action. Protection of Individual Rights: The Constitution, through its amendments, guarantees fundamental rights such as freedom of speech, the right to a fair trial, and protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. Due Process: The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments guarantee due process of law, ensuring fairness in legal proceedings and protection against arbitrary denial of life, liberty, or property. Equal Protection: The Fourteenth Amendment mandates equal protection under the law, ensuring that no individual or group is discriminated against by the legal system. Sources of Criminal Procedure Law. Constitutional Provisions. The Constitution, through various amendments, directly impacts criminal procedure: The Fourth Amendment: Protects against unreasonable searches and seizures and sets out requirements for search warrants based on probable cause. The Fifth Amendment: Provides protection against self-incrimination, guarantees due process, and introduces the concept of double jeopardy. The Sixth Amendment: Ensures the right to a speedy and public trial, the right to counsel, and the right to confront witnesses. The Fourteenth Amendment: Extends due process and equal protection clauses to state actions. These amendments form the bedrock of criminal procedure law, ensuring that the rights of individuals are protected throughout the criminal justice process. Federal and State Statutes Both federal and state legislatures enact statutes that define criminal behavior, set punishments, and regulate the criminal justice process. Federal Statutes: These are laws enacted by the U.S. Congress and apply nationwide. They deal with federal crimes like terrorism, drug trafficking, and immigration offenses. State Statutes: Each state has its own set of laws governing criminal acts within their jurisdiction. These laws vary from state to state but must not conflict with the Constitution. Case Law. Case law, especially decisions from the Supreme Court, plays a crucial role in interpreting the Constitution and shaping criminal procedure. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

DEFINITION AND PURPOSE OF CRIMINAL LAW. Criminal Law, at its core, is the body of law that deals with offenses against society. It's designed to maintain societal order and protect the rights and safety of individuals. In essence, Criminal Law sets the rules and boundaries that individuals within a society must follow. It delineates what actions are considered criminal and the consequences for engaging in such actions. But what sets Criminal Law apart from its counterpart, Civil Law? DISTINCTION BETWEEN CRIMINAL LAW AND CIVIL LAW. In a nutshell, Criminal Law primarily focuses on punishing individuals for committing crimes that harm society as a whole. The key distinction lies in the nature of the parties involved: In Criminal Law, the government, represented by the prosecutor, brings charges against the accused, seeking to establish their guilt. In Civil Law, it's typically one individual or entity (the plaintiff) suing another individual or entity (the defendant) for damages or specific remedies. The aim here is to provide redress for private wrongs, such as breaches of contract or personal injury. BACKGROUND TRANSITION. Now that we've clarified the purpose and distinction, let's explore where Criminal Law draws its authority and guidance. SOURCES OF CRIMINAL LAW. Criminal Law finds its roots in various sources, each contributing to the rich tapestry of legal principles and rules. Let's delve into these sources: STATUTES. Statutes, also known as legislative acts, are laws passed by legislative bodies, such as Congress at the federal level and state legislatures. These statutes define specific crimes, their elements, and the penalties for violations. They form the backbone of Criminal Law and provide a clear and written foundation for legal actions. COMMON LAW. Common Law, on the other hand, is developed through judicial decisions over time. It's the accumulation of legal precedents set by courts in previous cases. Judges interpret and apply the law to specific situations, and these decisions become binding on future cases. Common Law is especially important in areas where statutes are not comprehensive or do not exist. CONSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATIONS. Lastly, we must consider Constitutional Law. The United States Constitution, at both the federal and state levels, plays a significant role in shaping Criminal Law. It establishes the framework for government authority and the rights of individuals. Some Constitutional provisions directly impact Criminal Law, such as the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. BACKGROUND TRANSITION. So, how do these sources come together to form the legal landscape? HOW THESE SOURCES SHAPE THE LEGAL LANDSCAPE. Criminal Law operates within a complex web of statutes, common law, and constitutional principles. These sources interact to create a legal framework that guides law enforcement, prosecutors, defense attorneys, judges, and, of course, you as a future attorney. EXAMPLES. For example, let's consider a case of theft: Statutes will define what constitutes theft, specifying the elements required for a conviction, such as taking someone else's property with the intent to permanently deprive them of it. Common law decisions in previous theft cases will provide additional guidance on how courts have interpreted theft laws. Constitutional principles, like the right to due process, will ensure that the accused receives a fair trial and that their rights are protected throughout the process. To summarize, Criminal Law's primary purpose is to maintain societal order and protect individuals' rights by defining and punishing offenses against society. It differs from Civil Law in that it focuses on public wrongs and involves the government as the prosecuting entity. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Understanding the American Legal System. Civil Procedure is an integral part of the American legal system, a complex and dynamic framework designed to resolve disputes, uphold justice, and enforce legal rights. The system is structured across various levels, including federal and state courts, each with its own set of rules and jurisdictions. The American legal system operates under the principle of federalism, where power is divided between federal and state governments. This dual sovereignty affects how cases are heard and decided. Federal courts hear cases involving federal laws, constitutional issues, and disputes between states or involving foreign governments. State courts, on the other hand, handle a broad spectrum of cases, including family law, contract disputes, and personal injury cases. A unique feature of the American legal system is the doctrine of "stare decisis," which means "to stand by things decided." This principle emphasizes the importance of precedent, where past judicial decisions guide the outcomes of future cases. This approach ensures consistency and predictability in the law, but it also allows for flexibility and change when needed. Purpose and Scope of Civil Procedure. Civil Procedure governs the process and methods by which civil cases are handled in court. It encompasses the rules and standards that courts follow when adjudicating non-criminal disputes. The primary purpose of Civil Procedure is to ensure fairness and justice in the judicial process. It aims to provide an orderly and efficient framework for dispute resolution, ensuring that both plaintiffs and defendants receive a fair opportunity to present their cases. Civil Procedure encompasses various stages of litigation, from the initial filing of a lawsuit to the final judgment. It includes rules for filing and responding to a complaint, conducting discovery, presenting evidence, and appealing decisions. Understanding these rules is crucial for legal practitioners as they navigate the complexities of civil litigation. Distinction between Procedural and Substantive Law. It's essential to distinguish between procedural and substantive law. Substantive law defines the legal rights, duties, and liabilities of individuals and entities. It includes laws governing contracts, property, and torts. Procedural law, in contrast, provides the mechanism to enforce those rights and obligations. It focuses on the 'how' of the legal process, detailing the steps and procedures to resolve disputes and enforce legal rights. This distinction is crucial in legal practice. Substantive law informs the 'what' — what the case is about, what laws apply, and what outcomes are sought. Procedural law guides the 'how' — how to file a lawsuit, how to conduct discovery, and how to present a case in court. Both are essential for the effective administration of justice. Section 1 Review and Motivational Message. As we embark on this journey through Civil Procedure, it's important to appreciate the complexity and significance of these rules in the legal landscape. Understanding Civil Procedure is not just about memorizing rules; it's about grasping how these rules facilitate the fair, efficient, and just resolution of civil disputes. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Historical Background and Constitutional Convention. As we embark on this journey, it's crucial to understand the historical context in which the U.S. Constitution was conceived. In the late 18th century, the young United States was governed by the Articles of Confederation, a document that provided a loose alliance of the states but lacked a strong central government. This arrangement proved ineffective in addressing national issues like interstate commerce, defense, and debt management. The need for a more robust federal structure led to the Constitutional Convention of 1787 in Philadelphia. This gathering was a remarkable assembly of statesmen, including figures like George Washington, James Madison, and Benjamin Franklin. Their diverse backgrounds and perspectives fostered vigorous debates on how to balance federal and state powers and protect individual rights. The resulting Constitution was a masterful compromise between different interests. It created a federal system with a stronger central government while ensuring that states retained significant autonomy. This balance is a key feature of the Constitution and a recurring theme in constitutional law. The Structure of the Constitution. The Constitution is elegantly structured, yet comprehensive. It begins with the Preamble, a statement of purpose that underscores the values of unity, justice, tranquility, defense, welfare, and liberty. Article I establishes the legislative branch (Congress), detailing its powers and limitations. It sets forth the bicameral legislature, with representation based on population in the House of Representatives and equal state representation in the Senate. Article II defines the executive branch, outlining the President's roles, including serving as the commander-in-chief, making treaties (with Senate approval), and appointing federal officers and judges. Article III establishes the judiciary, creating the Supreme Court and allowing Congress to establish lower federal courts. It defines judicial powers and outlines the case types under federal jurisdiction. Articles IV to VII cover various issues like state interactions, the amendment process, federal supremacy, and the ratification process. The Constitution’s amendability is crucial. The first ten amendments, known as the Bill of Rights, were quickly added to guarantee fundamental freedoms and rights. Subsequent amendments have addressed issues like slavery (13th Amendment), voting rights (15th, 19th, 24th, and 26th Amendments), and presidential terms (22nd Amendment). Principles of Judicial Review (Marbury v Madison). The case of Marbury v Madison (1803) is a cornerstone of American constitutional law. It emerged amid political conflict between the outgoing Federalist administration and the incoming Jeffersonian Republicans. William Marbury, appointed as a justice of the peace by President John Adams, sued Secretary of State James Madison for not delivering his commission. Chief Justice John Marshall, in a stroke of judicial statesmanship, ruled that while Marbury had a right to his commission, the Supreme Court lacked the authority under the Judiciary Act of 1789 to issue a writ of mandamus (a court order compelling a government official to act) to deliver it. This ruling cleverly avoided a political confrontation while establishing a key principle: the power of the courts to review and nullify acts of Congress that conflict with the Constitution. This principle of judicial review is not explicitly stated in the Constitution but has become a fundamental aspect of its operation. Methods of Constitutional Interpretation. Interpreting the Constitution is a complex endeavor, involving various methodologies that reflect different views of the Constitution's nature and purpose. Textualism focuses strictly on the text's plain meaning. Textualists argue that the Constitution should be interpreted based on the ordinary meaning of its words at the time of its drafting. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Damages: Compensatory, Consequential, and Incidental. Introduction to Damages. Damages are the primary remedy for a breached contract, aiming to compensate the non-breaching party for their losses. The types of damages include: Compensatory Damages: Direct losses suffered as a result of the breach. These aim to put the non-breaching party in the position they would have been in if the contract had been performed. Consequential Damages: Also known as special damages, these are indirect losses that result from the breach but were foreseeable at the time of contract formation. Incidental Damages: Additional costs incurred to avoid further loss after the breach. Calculating Damages. Understanding how damages are calculated is crucial: Direct and Proximate Cause: Damages must be a direct result of the breach and reasonably foreseeable. Certainty: Damages must be quantifiable and certain, not speculative. Mitigation: The non-breaching party has a duty to mitigate damages by taking reasonable steps to minimize losses. Specific Performance. Overview of Specific Performance. Specific performance is an equitable remedy where the court orders the breaching party to fulfill their contractual obligations. It is typically available when monetary damages are inadequate, such as in the sale of unique goods or real estate. Feasibility: Courts consider whether specific performance is practical and feasible. Discretion of the Court: Courts have discretion in granting specific performance based on fairness and the nature of the contract. Restitution and Rescission. Restitution. Restitution involves restoring the non-breaching party to their pre-contract position. This can include returning any benefits or consideration received. Rescission. Rescission involves canceling the contract and restoring the parties to their pre-contract status. This may occur due to fraud, misrepresentation, or other factors. Landmark Case: Lumley v Wagner (1852). The case of Lumley v Wagner is illustrative of the court's power to grant specific performance. In this case, an injunction was issued to prevent a singer from performing at a rival venue, enforcing specific performance of an exclusive contract. Conclusion. A nuanced understanding of the remedies for breach of contract is essential for law students and legal practitioners. By grasping the principles of compensatory, consequential, and incidental damages, understanding the conditions for specific performance, and recognizing the concepts of restitution and rescission, students and lawyers can provide effective legal counsel in a variety of contract-related disputes. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Introduction to Interrogations and Constitutional Foundations: Interrogations form a critical phase of criminal investigations, raising significant constitutional considerations. This section initiates the discussion by exploring the historical context of interrogations and their constitutional foundations. We'll delve into the Fifth Amendment, which protects individuals from self-incrimination, laying the groundwork for understanding the delicate balance between law enforcement's need for information and an individual's right to remain silent. Miranda v Arizona and the Right to Remain Silent: Miranda v Arizona (1966) stands as a landmark case that solidified the right to remain silent during police interrogations. We'll dissect the Miranda decision, examining the court's rationale and the establishment of the famous Miranda warnings. This foundational right ensures that individuals are aware of their constitutional protections and can choose to exercise their right to remain silent without adverse consequences. Custodial Interrogations and Threshold for Miranda: A crucial aspect of Miranda rights is their application during custodial interrogations. We'll explore the distinction between custodial and non-custodial situations and discuss the threshold at which Miranda rights are triggered. Understanding when law enforcement must advise individuals of their rights is essential for evaluating the admissibility of statements obtained during interrogations. Invoking and Waiving Miranda Rights: Once Miranda rights are given, individuals have the choice to either invoke or waive them. This segment examines the practical implications of invoking the right to remain silent or requesting legal counsel. We'll explore the nuances of waiver, emphasizing the importance of voluntariness and a knowing and intelligent relinquishment of Miranda rights. Exceptions to Miranda: While Miranda provides crucial protections, there are exceptions that allow law enforcement to proceed with questioning without explicitly issuing Miranda warnings. This section will discuss scenarios where exceptions apply, such as public safety exceptions and routine booking questions. Understanding these exceptions is vital for grasping the scope of Miranda protections in various situations. Confessions and the Voluntariness Standard: Confessions are powerful pieces of evidence, but their admissibility hinges on voluntariness. We'll delve into the voluntariness standard, examining how courts assess the circumstances surrounding confessions. Cases like Brown v Mississippi (1936) and Culombe v Connecticut (1961) provide insights into the constitutional requirements for a confession to be considered voluntary. Electronic Recording of Interrogations: The increasing use of technology in law enforcement has led to discussions about the benefits of electronically recording interrogations. We'll explore the advantages and challenges associated with recording interrogations, analyzing how this practice aligns with constitutional principles and enhances transparency in the criminal justice system. Global Perspectives on Interrogations and Human Rights: Interrogation practices vary globally, and this part of the session provides a comparative analysis of how different legal systems address interrogations and confessions. We'll touch on international human rights standards and conventions that influence the treatment of individuals during interrogations, contributing to a broader understanding of the global landscape. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Understanding Real Covenants and Equitable Servitudes. Real covenants and equitable servitudes are legal mechanisms that shape the use of land and create enforceable obligations for property owners. Real Covenants. A real covenant is a contractual agreement between property owners that imposes certain obligations or restrictions related to land use. These covenants are typically found in deeds or other written agreements. Enforceability. For a real covenant to be enforceable, it must meet certain criteria, including a writing requirement, intent to bind successors, and touch and concern the land. Courts carefully examine these elements to determine the covenant's validity. Equitable Servitudes. Equitable servitudes are similar to real covenants but are based on principles of fairness and equity. These servitudes arise when a property owner, through a written agreement or a pattern of conduct, creates an obligation that runs with the land. Enforcement. Equitable servitudes are enforced in equity, meaning that a court can issue an injunction to prevent a violation of the servitude. This legal mechanism allows for the protection of property interests and the preservation of neighborhood aesthetics. Case Study: The Miller Subdivision. In the Miller Subdivision case, homeowners in a residential subdivision had a real covenant prohibiting the construction of fences over a certain height. One homeowner, Mr. Thompson, erected a fence exceeding the agreed-upon limit. The court, in its decision, analyzed the enforceability of the real covenant and the impact on property values and neighborhood aesthetics. Land Use Planning and Zoning Laws. Real covenants and equitable servitudes intersect with land use planning and zoning laws. Zoning regulations, established by local governments, dictate how land can be used and developed within a specific area. Case Study: The City of Greenwood Zoning Dispute. In the Greenwood case, a property owner sought to challenge a zoning restriction limiting the height of structures. This scenario provides insights into how zoning laws and real covenants may conflict, raising questions about property rights and community interests. Practical Considerations for Property Owners. Understanding real covenants and equitable servitudes is crucial for property owners and developers. Whether you're planning a new development or navigating existing agreements, a deep grasp of these legal mechanisms is essential. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Understanding Strict Liability. Strict liability is a legal concept that holds a party responsible for certain actions or injuries, regardless of their intent or level of care. Unlike negligence or intentional torts, strict liability focuses on the inherent risk associated with certain activities or products. Cases Where Strict Liability Applies. Strict liability is often applied in the following scenarios: Ultra-Hazardous Activities: Activities that are inherently dangerous and pose a high risk of harm may give rise to strict liability. These activities are considered so risky that those who engage in them are held strictly liable for resulting harms. Example: Blasting operations in densely populated areas are considered ultra-hazardous activities. Product Liability: Strict liability is frequently applied in cases involving defective products. If a product is found to be defective and causes harm, the manufacturer or seller may be held strictly liable for the injuries. Example: If a consumer is injured due to a manufacturing defect in a household appliance, strict liability may apply to the manufacturer. Elements of Strict Liability. To establish strict liability, certain elements must be present: Engaging in an Ultra-Hazardous Activity or Product Defect: The defendant must either engage in an ultra-hazardous activity or be involved in the production or distribution of a defective product. Causation: The plaintiff must establish that the harm suffered was a result of the ultra-hazardous activity or the defect in the product. Harm: As with other tort claims, the plaintiff must have suffered harm or damages as a result of the defendant's actions. Ultra-Hazardous Activities. Ultra-hazardous activities are those that involve a high degree of risk of harm, even when conducted with utmost care. Some factors that may determine whether an activity is ultra-hazardous include: High Risk of Harm: The activity must pose a high risk of harm, even when conducted with reasonable care. Inability to Eliminate Risk: The risk associated with the activity must be such that it cannot be completely eliminated, regardless of the precautions taken. Not a Common Activity: The activity should not be a common one in the community. Product Liability and Defective Products. In the realm of product liability, strict liability can be imposed for injuries caused by defective products. There are three main types of product defects that may lead to strict liability: Design Defects: These occur when the design of the product is inherently dangerous, making it defective even before it is manufactured. Manufacturing Defects: These defects arise during the manufacturing process, causing certain units of a product to be different from the intended design. Marketing Defects (Failure to Warn): A product may be defective if it lacks proper warnings or instructions regarding its use, resulting in harm to the consumer. Defenses to Strict Liability. While strict liability imposes liability without proving fault, there are some defenses available to defendants: Assumption of Risk: If the plaintiff voluntarily assumes the risk associated with the ultra-hazardous activity or the use of the product, it can serve as a defense. Example: If a person knowingly participates in a hazardous recreational activity, they might be considered to have assumed the risks associated with it. Contributory or Comparative Negligence: In some jurisdictions, the plaintiff's own negligence in causing the harm may reduce or eliminate the defendant's liability. Example: If a person's negligence contributes to their injury while engaged in a risky activity, the defense of contributory or comparative negligence may be raised. Product Misuse: If the plaintiff's misuse of the product is a substantial factor in causing the harm, it may be a defense. Example: If a consumer uses a product in a way that is not intended or recommended and gets injured, the defense of product misuse may apply. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Federalism: An Overview. 1. Defining Federalism. Federalism is a system of government in which power is divided between a central (national) government and regional (state) governments. Each level of government has its own set of powers and responsibilities. Significance: Federalism aims to balance the authority of the national government with the autonomy of individual states, fostering a cooperative and decentralized governance structure. Example: The federal government has the power to regulate interstate commerce, while states have the authority to establish and enforce laws within their borders. Powers of the Federal Government. 1. Enumerated Powers. The Constitution grants specific powers to the federal government, known as enumerated powers. These include the power to coin money, regulate commerce, declare war, and establish post offices. Significance: Enumerated powers delineate the areas in which the federal government has authority, creating a framework for its actions. Example: The federal government's authority to regulate interstate commerce has been invoked in cases involving national economic policies. 2. Implied Powers. Implied powers are not explicitly stated in the Constitution but are considered necessary for the federal government to carry out its enumerated powers effectively. These powers are derived from the necessary and proper clause. Significance: Implied powers allow the federal government flexibility in addressing new challenges and situations that may not have been foreseen by the framers. Example: The establishment of a national bank, as justified by Congress in McCulloch v Maryland (1819), illustrates the application of implied powers. Powers Reserved to the States. 1. Reserved Powers. The Tenth Amendment to the Constitution reserves powers not delegated to the federal government to the states. These reserved powers encompass areas such as education, criminal law, and regulation of intrastate commerce. Significance: Reserved powers highlight the autonomy of states in managing internal affairs and tailoring policies to local needs. Example: State laws regarding education standards and curriculum exemplify the exercise of reserved powers. 2. Concurrent Powers. Some powers are shared by both the federal government and the states, known as concurrent powers. These include the power to tax, maintain courts, and establish and enforce laws. Significance: Concurrent powers reflect the cooperative nature of the federal system, allowing both levels of government to act in certain domains. Example: Both federal and state governments have the authority to levy taxes, with each level contributing to the overall tax structure. Intergovernmental Relations. 1. Cooperative Federalism. Cooperative federalism refers to a model of intergovernmental relations in which the federal government and states work together to address complex issues. This often involves shared funding and joint programs. Significance: Cooperative federalism recognizes that challenges such as economic crises and public health require collaborative efforts between different levels of government. Example: Programs like Medicaid, which involve both federal and state funding, exemplify cooperative federalism. 2. Coercive Federalism. Coercive federalism occurs when the federal government imposes its will on the states through mandates or conditions attached to funding. Significance: Coercive federalism raises questions about the balance between federal and state authority, particularly when conditions may infringe on state prerogatives. Example: Requirements attached to federal education funding that mandate specific policies or standards illustrate coercive federalism. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Express Warranties. Introduction to Express Warranties. Express warranties are explicit promises or representations made by a seller regarding the quality, characteristics, or performance of a product. Law students should comprehend the essentials of express warranties: Nature of Statements: Express warranties can be made through statements, affirmations, or descriptions of fact about the goods. Basis of the Bargain: The representation must become part of the basis of the bargain, meaning the buyer relies on it when making the purchase. Implied Warranties. Implied warranties are inherent in every sale of goods, regardless of whether they are explicitly stated. Law students should understand the two primary types of implied warranties: Implied Warranty of Merchantability: This warranty assures that the product is fit for its ordinary purpose and meets industry standards. Implied Warranty of Fitness for a Particular Purpose: This warranty applies when the seller knows the buyer's specific purpose for the goods and recommends a product to meet that purpose. Disclaiming and Limiting Warranties. Sellers have the ability to disclaim or limit warranties, but certain rules apply: Clear Language: Disclaimers must be clear and conspicuous, and limitations must be reasonable. Implied Warranties: Disclaimers for implied warranties, especially the implied warranty of merchantability, are subject to strict scrutiny. Product Liability. Introduction to Product Liability. Product liability law holds manufacturers and sellers responsible for defects in their products that cause harm. Key points include: Three Main Theories: Product liability cases typically revolve around strict liability, negligence, and breach of warranty. Consumer Protection: Product liability law serves as a crucial element in consumer protection, ensuring accountability for the safety of products. Strict Liability in Product Liability. The Concept of Strict Liability. Strict liability holds manufacturers and sellers responsible for injuries caused by defective products, irrespective of negligence. Law students should grasp the elements of strict liability: Defective Product: The product must be defective, either due to its design, manufacturing, or inadequate warnings. Causation: The defect must have caused the injury. Types of Product Defects. Understanding the types of defects is essential: Design Defects: Inherent flaws in a product's design that make it unsafe. Manufacturing Defects: Defects that occur during the production process, making individual products dangerous. Marketing Defects (Failure to Warn): Inadequate warnings or instructions related to product use. Negligence in Product Liability. The Role of Negligence. Negligence is another theory in product liability cases, involving failure to exercise reasonable care in the design, production, or marketing of a product: Duty of Care: The manufacturer or seller owes a duty of care to consumers. Breach of Duty: The breach involves actions or omissions that fall below the standard of care. Causation: The breach must be the direct cause of the consumer's injury. Defenses to Negligence Claims. Defendants may assert various defenses: Assumption of Risk: The consumer was aware of and accepted the risks. Comparative Negligence: The consumer's negligence contributed to the injury. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Overview of the Fourth Amendment: The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution is a cornerstone of individual privacy rights within the legal system. It protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures by law enforcement. This section will provide a comprehensive overview of the Fourth Amendment, delving into its historical context, the text of the amendment, and its interpretation by the courts. Understanding the Fourth Amendment is essential for grasping the delicate balance between law enforcement's investigative powers and the protection of individual liberties. Warrants and Probable Cause: The issuance of warrants and the requirement of probable cause are critical components of the Fourth Amendment's safeguards. We'll explore the intricacies of obtaining search warrants, the necessity of establishing probable cause—reasonable grounds to believe a crime has been committed—before a warrant is issued, and the role of judges in this process. This section aims to provide a nuanced understanding of how the Fourth Amendment sets the standard for lawful searches conducted with judicial oversight. Exigent Circumstances and Exceptions to Warrant Requirement: While warrants are a fundamental aspect of lawful searches, there are exceptions, especially in exigent circumstances. We'll delve into situations where law enforcement may bypass the warrant requirement due to immediate threats or emergencies. Understanding these exceptions is crucial for appreciating the flexibility built into the Fourth Amendment to address rapidly evolving situations while maintaining constitutional protections. Searches Incident to Arrest and Vehicle Searches: This section focuses on specific scenarios where the Fourth Amendment permits searches without a warrant. Searches incident to arrest, designed to ensure officer safety and prevent the destruction of evidence, will be explored. Additionally, we'll discuss the rules governing searches of vehicles, which balance law enforcement's need to investigate potential criminal activity with individuals' expectations of privacy in their personal spaces. Technological Advances and Privacy: The advent of technology has introduced new challenges to traditional notions of search and seizure. This part of the session will delve into how technological advances, such as electronic surveillance, drones, and data collection, intersect with the Fourth Amendment. We'll discuss landmark cases and evolving legal standards that address the privacy implications of modern technology, emphasizing the dynamic nature of constitutional protections in the digital age. Supreme Court Decisions Shaping Search and Seizure Law: The Supreme Court plays a pivotal role in interpreting the Fourth Amendment. We'll analyze key decisions that have shaped search and seizure law, including landmark cases such as Terry v Ohio, Katz v United States, and recent rulings that reflect the evolving landscape of privacy rights. Understanding these decisions provides insights into how the judiciary navigates the tension between law enforcement needs and individual privacy protections. Summary: Session 6 provides an extensive exploration of the Fourth Amendment and Search and Seizure Law. It begins with establishing the foundational principles of the Fourth Amendment, discussing warrants, probable cause, and the delicate balance between individual privacy and law enforcement's investigative powers. The session then delves into exceptions to the warrant requirement, examining exigent circumstances and scenarios such as searches incident to arrest and vehicle searches. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Understanding Landlord-Tenant Relationships. Landlord-Tenant Law governs the rights and obligations of both landlords and tenants in the context of leasing real property. Whether you're a property owner seeking to lease your space or a tenant looking for a place to call home, understanding these legal dynamics is crucial. Key Elements of Landlord-Tenant Law. Lease Agreements. At the heart of the landlord-tenant relationship lies the lease agreement. This legally binding document outlines the terms and conditions of the tenancy, covering aspects such as rent, duration of the lease, and responsibilities of both parties. Types of Leases. Leases can take various forms, including fixed-term leases and month-to-month leases. Each type comes with its own set of implications for both landlords and tenants. Rights and Responsibilities. Understanding the rights and responsibilities of both parties is essential for maintaining a healthy landlord-tenant relationship. Landlord's Rights and Duties. Landlords have the right to receive rent in a timely manner and to maintain the property in a habitable condition. However, they also have responsibilities, such as providing necessary repairs and adhering to local housing codes. Tenant's Rights and Duties. Tenants, on the other hand, have the right to a habitable living space and privacy. They are obligated to pay rent on time and adhere to the terms of the lease. Eviction and Lease Termination. Sometimes, disputes arise, leading to eviction or termination of the lease. Understanding the legal grounds for eviction and the proper procedures to follow is crucial for both parties. Case Study: The Evans Eviction. In the Evans case, a landlord sought to evict a tenant for non-payment of rent. The court's decision emphasized the importance of following the legal eviction process and providing proper notice. Landlord-Tenant Law in Practice. To illustrate these concepts further, let's explore a real-world scenario: Scenario: The Miller Lease Dispute. Mr. Miller, a tenant, discovered a mold issue in his rented apartment. He notified the landlord, Mrs. Johnson, who failed to address the problem promptly. In this scenario, we'll explore the legal implications for both parties and how Landlord-Tenant Law comes into play. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Exploring Intentional Torts. Intentional torts are characterized by the defendant's deliberate actions that lead to harm or injury to the plaintiff. Unlike negligence, where the focus is on the defendant's failure to exercise reasonable care, intentional torts require proof of intent. Let's delve into some key intentional torts: 1. Assault. Assault occurs when one person intentionally puts another in reasonable apprehension of an imminent harmful or offensive contact. The key is the victim's reasonable fear. Example: If someone raises a fist and threatens to punch another person, putting them in fear of imminent harm, it constitutes assault. 2. Battery. Battery involves the intentional and harmful or offensive touching of another person without their consent. It's not the harm caused but the intentional act of touching that defines battery. Example: If someone intentionally punches another person, causing physical harm, it constitutes battery. 3. False Imprisonment. False imprisonment occurs when one person intentionally restricts another's freedom of movement within a bounded area without their consent. The victim must be aware of the confinement or harmed by it. Example: If a store employee wrongfully detains a shopper, suspecting them of theft without proper evidence, it constitutes false imprisonment. 4. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress. This tort involves intentional conduct that is extreme and outrageous, causing severe emotional distress to another person. Example: If someone engages in severe bullying or harassment, intentionally causing emotional harm, it may constitute intentional infliction of emotional distress. 5. Defamation. Defamation is the intentional publication of a false statement that harms the reputation of another person. It includes both written (libel) and spoken (slander) forms. Example: If someone spreads false rumors about another person, damaging their reputation, it constitutes defamation. 6. Invasion of Privacy. Invasion of privacy comprises several intentional torts, such as intrusion into seclusion, publication of private facts, false light, and appropriation of likeness. Example: If someone secretly records another person in their private space without consent, it constitutes invasion of privacy. 7. Trespass to Land. Trespass to land occurs when a person intentionally enters the land of another without permission. It covers physical entry or causing an object to enter the land. Example: If someone enters another person's property without permission, it constitutes trespass to land. 8. Trespass to Chattels and Conversion. These torts involve intentional interference with another person's personal property. Trespass to chattels is a lesser interference, while conversion is a substantial interference or wrongful possession. Example: If someone intentionally damages another person's car (trespass to chattels) or steals it (conversion), it constitutes these intentional torts. Key Elements of Intentional Torts. To succeed in an intentional tort claim, certain elements must be established: Intent: The defendant must have the intent to commit the act that resulted in harm. Intent can be specific, intending the actual consequences, or general, intending the act but not necessarily the harm. Causation: The defendant's intentional act must be the actual cause of the harm suffered by the plaintiff. Harm: The plaintiff must have suffered harm or damages as a result of the defendant's intentional act. Defenses to Intentional Torts. Defendants in intentional tort cases have several defenses at their disposal: Consent: If the plaintiff consented to the defendant's actions, knowing the risks involved, it can serve as a complete defense. Example: In a case where participants in a contact sport agree to the physical nature of the game, the defense of consent might apply. Self-Defense: Individuals have the right to use reasonable force to defend themselves from an imminent threat. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Separation of Powers: A Foundational Principle. 1. Defining Separation of Powers. The separation of powers is a fundamental principle of the U.S. Constitution that distributes governmental powers among the three branches to prevent the concentration of power in a single entity. Each branch has distinct functions and operates independently. Significance: Separation of powers is designed to prevent abuses of power, promote checks and balances, and ensure that no single branch becomes too dominant. Example: While the President has the power to veto legislation (executive), Congress has the authority to override that veto with a two-thirds majority vote (legislative), creating a system of checks and balances. The Executive Branch. 1. Powers and Responsibilities of the President. The executive branch, headed by the President, is responsible for implementing and enforcing laws. The President has the authority to make treaties, appoint federal judges, and serve as the Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces. Significance: The executive branch plays a vital role in the day-to-day functioning of the government and has the power to shape and implement policies. Example: The President's role as Commander-in-Chief was evident in decisions related to military actions, such as the authorization of the use of force in response to acts of terrorism. The Legislative Branch. 1. Powers and Responsibilities of Congress. Congress, consisting of the Senate and the House of Representatives, is responsible for making laws. It has the power to tax, regulate commerce, declare war, and confirm presidential appointments. Significance: Congress is a key component of the checks and balances system, with the ability to pass laws, override vetoes, and control the budget. Example: The passage of major legislation, such as the Affordable Care Act, demonstrates the significant role of Congress in shaping national policy. The Judicial Branch. 1. Powers and Responsibilities of the Judiciary. The judicial branch, headed by the Supreme Court, interprets laws and ensures that they align with the Constitution. The judiciary has the power of judicial review, allowing it to declare laws or executive actions unconstitutional. Significance: The judiciary acts as a check on the other branches by interpreting the law and protecting individual rights. Example: Landmark Supreme Court cases, like Brown v Board of Education, have played a critical role in interpreting the Constitution and advancing civil rights. Interactions Among the Branches. 1. Checks and Balances in Action. The system of checks and balances ensures that no single branch becomes too powerful. Each branch has methods to check the powers of the others, preventing an imbalance of authority. Significance: Checks and balances foster cooperation and prevent abuse of power, contributing to the stability of the government. Example: The President can veto legislation passed by Congress, but Congress can override a veto with a two-thirds majority, exemplifying the balance of power. Conclusion. In this session, we explored the foundational principle of separation of powers and examined the distinct roles and powers of the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Understanding this separation is crucial for appreciating the dynamics of the U.S. government and its commitment to preventing the concentration of power. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Chapter 15: Contract Interpretation and Construction. In this chapter, we explore the intricate principles governing the interpretation and construction of contracts. The understanding of how contractual terms are construed is fundamental for lawyers navigating the often complex landscape of contractual relationships. This chapter will delve into the rules, methods, and considerations involved in the interpretation of contracts. Rules of Contract Interpretation. Introduction to Contract Interpretation. Contract interpretation is an art as much as it is a science. It involves discerning the meaning and intent of the parties from the language used in the contract. Key principles include: Objective Standard: Courts generally interpret contracts based on the objective intentions of the parties. This means looking at what a reasonable person would understand from the contract's language. Plain Meaning Rule: When the language of a contract is clear and unambiguous, courts typically interpret it according to its plain and ordinary meaning. Ambiguity: When terms are unclear or capable of multiple interpretations, courts may consider extrinsic evidence to determine the parties' intent. Extrinsic Evidence. Extrinsic evidence, information beyond the contract itself, can be crucial in interpreting certain contracts: Parol Evidence Rule: This rule generally limits the use of extrinsic evidence to contradict or vary the terms of a fully integrated written contract. However, it allows the use of such evidence to interpret ambiguous terms. Integration: A contract is considered integrated if it represents the final and complete agreement of the parties. Integrated contracts are less likely to be supplemented or contradicted by extrinsic evidence. Incorporation of Trade Usage and Course of Dealing. Trade Usage. Trade usage, or custom, is a practice or course of dealing commonly observed in a particular industry. Its incorporation into contracts involves understanding: Implied Terms: Trade usage can imply terms into a contract. For example, a contract for the sale of goods may incorporate industry-standard quality standards or delivery times. Course of Performance: Trade usage can be established through the course of performance in a series of prior transactions between the parties. Course of Dealing. Course of dealing involves the previous conduct and interactions between the parties in their prior transactions: Modification of Contract: The parties' course of dealing can be used to modify the terms of the contract if they have a consistent history of altering the contract's provisions. Supplementing Ambiguous Terms: Course of dealing can be used to supplement ambiguous terms in a contract to help determine the parties' intent. Landmark Case: Masterson v Sine (1968). Masterson v Sine is a crucial case highlighting the principles of contract interpretation. The court in this case considered the parties' course of dealing to determine the intended meaning of a contract clause, emphasizing the importance of extrinsic evidence in certain situations. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Session 5: Foundations of Criminal Procedure and the Exclusionary Rule and Its Application. Introduction to Criminal Procedure and Constitutional Framework: Criminal procedure is the mechanism through which the legal system addresses and adjudicates criminal offenses. It operates within the confines of the Constitution, particularly the Bill of Rights. Understanding its foundations involves exploring how the constitutional framework shapes the balance between individual rights and the government's interest in maintaining public order. This session initiates a journey into the intricate web of legal procedures by delving into the historical evolution of criminal procedure. From the colonial era to the ratification of the Constitution and the subsequent incorporation of the Bill of Rights, we'll trace the development of due process and the constitutional protections afforded to individuals accused of crimes. Due Process and Evolution of Constitutional Protections: The concept of due process is fundamental to the fairness and equity of the legal system. It ensures that individuals are not deprived of life, liberty, or property without proper legal procedures. We'll explore the evolution of due process and its incorporation into the Fourteenth Amendment, extending its protections to state actions. A detailed examination of key due process cases, such as the landmark decision in Gideon v Wainwright (1963), will illuminate the critical role played by the Supreme Court in defining and expanding the rights of the accused. This case, in particular, established the right to counsel for indigent defendants, setting a precedent for the constitutional guarantee of legal representation. Landmark Cases: Gideon v Wainwright and Miranda v Arizona: Gideon v Wainwright and Miranda v Arizona represent pivotal moments in the evolution of criminal procedure. Gideon ensured that legal representation became an unequivocal right for all defendants, regardless of their financial means. This case reshaped the landscape of criminal defense and laid the groundwork for a more equitable legal system. Miranda v Arizona, on the other hand, introduced the iconic Miranda warnings, ensuring that individuals in custody are aware of their right to remain silent and have an attorney present during interrogations. We'll dissect the Miranda decision, examining its impact on custodial interrogations, the admissibility of confessions, and the broader implications for police procedures. The Exclusionary Rule and Its Application. Historical Development of the Exclusionary Rule: The Exclusionary Rule stands as a bulwark against unlawful searches and seizures, embodying the principle that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment is inadmissible in court. We'll embark on a historical journey, tracing the origins of this rule through landmark cases such as Weeks v United States and Mapp v Ohio. Weeks v United States (1914) marked the first recognition of the Exclusionary Rule at the federal level, asserting that evidence seized unlawfully by federal authorities should be excluded from trial. Mapp v Ohio (1961) extended this rule to state courts, establishing a uniform standard for the exclusion of evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment. Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Doctrine: Central to the Exclusionary Rule is the "fruit of the poisonous tree" doctrine. This metaphorical doctrine holds that evidence derived from an initial illegal search or seizure is tainted and therefore inadmissible. We'll explore the intricacies of this doctrine, examining cases where courts have applied it to ensure the rule's efficacy in deterring constitutional violations. Understanding the application of the "fruit of the poisonous tree" doctrine is essential for grasping the Exclusionary Rule's scope and impact. It ensures that law enforcement cannot indirectly benefit from an initial constitutional violation by using derivative evidence against the accused. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Understanding Future Interests. Future interests in property law refer to rights that someone may have in a property but will only take effect in the future. These interests come into play after the termination of a preceding estate, often involving questions of inheritance and succession. Vested vs. Contingent Interests. A vested interest is one that is certain to take effect, whereas a contingent interest depends on the occurrence of a specific event. Distinguishing between the two is pivotal for grasping the nuances of property law. Rule Against Perpetuities. Now, let's navigate the intricate Rule Against Perpetuities, a rule designed to prevent property from being tied up indefinitely. This rule imposes a limit on the duration of future interests, ensuring that they vest within a reasonable time. Application of the Rule. To understand the Rule Against Perpetuities better, let's examine its application through real-world examples. Case Study: The Reynolds Legacy. The Reynolds family established a trust with a provision granting the family's heirs a future interest in the family estate. However, the trust document failed to comply with the Rule Against Perpetuities, leading to legal challenges. The court, in its decision, emphasized the importance of drafting future interest provisions with careful consideration of the rule's limitations. Types of Future Interests. Future interests come in various forms, including remainders and executory interests. Remainders. Remainders are future interests that take effect when a prior estate ends, and they can be vested or contingent. Understanding the different types of remainders and the conditions for their validity is crucial. Executory Interests. Executory interests, on the other hand, cut short the preceding estate and take effect immediately. Real-World Implications. To bring the concept of future interests closer to home, let's explore how these legal principles play out in real-life scenarios. Case Study: The Anderson Family Trust. In the Anderson family trust, the grantor established a contingent remainder for the grandchildren, dependent on the occurrence of a specific event. The court's decision highlighted the significance of defining contingent remainders with precision to avoid ambiguity. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Understanding Causation. Causation is the linchpin that connects a defendant's actions to the harm suffered by the plaintiff. It seeks to answer the fundamental question: Did the defendant's conduct cause the harm? The exploration of causation involves two key components: cause-in-fact and proximate cause. Cause-in-Fact (Actual Cause). Cause-in-fact, also known as actual cause, examines whether the defendant's actions were the direct cause of the harm. The "but for" test is commonly used to determine cause-in-fact. In other words, would the harm have occurred "but for" the defendant's actions? Example: In a car accident case, if Driver A runs a red light and collides with Driver B's car, the cause-in-fact is established by asking whether the accident would have occurred "but for" Driver A running the red light. Proximate Cause (Legal Cause). Proximate cause focuses on the foreseeability of the harm. It asks whether the harm was a foreseeable consequence of the defendant's actions. Proximate cause sets limits on liability, ensuring that defendants are not held responsible for incredibly remote or unforeseeable consequences of their conduct. Example: If a person throws a ball in a crowded area and it unexpectedly causes someone to trip and fall, the question is whether the tripping and falling were foreseeable consequences of throwing the ball. Challenges in Causation. Causation can present challenges in various scenarios: Concurrent Causes: In cases where multiple factors or parties contribute to the harm, determining which party's actions were the actual cause can be complex. Intervening Causes: Intervening causes are unforeseeable events or actions that occur after the defendant's conduct but before the harm. They can break the chain of causation. Multiple Plaintiffs: In cases involving multiple plaintiffs, it may be challenging to establish causation for each plaintiff, especially if their injuries resulted from different aspects of the defendant's actions. Case Example: Slip and Fall in a Store. Imagine a scenario where a person slips and falls in a store, suffering injuries. The store's negligence is a potential cause of the injuries. However, if it is discovered that the person was also texting on their phone while walking, their distraction may be considered an intervening cause, breaking the chain of causation. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Judicial Review: An Overview. 1. Defining Judicial Review. Judicial review is the power of the judiciary to review and, if necessary, invalidate actions of the executive and legislative branches that violate the Constitution. This crucial power allows the courts to ensure that government actions align with the supreme law of the land. Significance: Judicial review acts as a vital check on the powers of the other branches, safeguarding the principles enshrined in the Constitution. Example: If a law passed by Congress or an action taken by the President is challenged as unconstitutional, the judiciary has the authority to review and potentially strike down such measures. Marbury v Madison: Establishing Judicial Review. 1. Overview of Marbury v Madison. Marbury v Madison (1803) is a landmark case in U.S. constitutional law. Chief Justice John Marshall, writing for the Supreme Court, established the principle of judicial review. Background: William Marbury was appointed as a justice of the peace by President John Adams but did not receive his official commission before the new administration took office. Marbury petitioned the Supreme Court to compel the new Secretary of State, James Madison, to deliver the commission. 2. Key Holding: Power of Judicial Review. In Marbury v Madison, the Court held that it had the authority to review the constitutionality of actions by the executive branch. Chief Justice Marshall articulated that it was the duty of the judiciary to interpret the Constitution and ensure that it remained the supreme law of the land. Significance: This case established the principle that the judiciary has the power to declare acts of Congress or the President unconstitutional, setting a foundational precedent for the system of checks and balances. Quote: "It is emphatically the province and duty of the Judicial Department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases must, of necessity, expound and interpret that rule." The Role of the Judiciary in Interpreting the Constitution. 1. Judicial Interpretation of Constitutional Provisions. The judiciary plays a central role in interpreting the Constitution. This involves analyzing constitutional provisions, understanding their historical context, and applying them to contemporary issues. Significance: Judicial interpretation ensures that constitutional principles remain relevant in a changing society. It allows the Constitution to be a living document that adapts to new challenges and circumstances. Example: In interpreting the First Amendment's protection of free speech, the judiciary must balance the right to express oneself with considerations of public safety and order. 2. The Doctrine of Judicial Restraint v Judicial Activism. Judicial restraint involves judges interpreting the Constitution narrowly and deferring to the decisions of elected branches. Judicial activism, on the other hand, involves judges interpreting the Constitution more broadly and sometimes shaping public policy. Significance: The debate between judicial restraint and activism reflects differing views on the proper role of the judiciary in a democratic society. Example: In cases related to social issues, such as abortion rights or marriage equality, the judiciary's approach can be influenced by whether judges prioritize interpreting the Constitution narrowly or expansively. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Types of Contract Performance. Introduction to Contract Performance. Performance is at the core of any contractual relationship. It involves the parties fulfilling their respective duties and obligations under the contract. Law students should understand the different types of performance: Complete Performance: Occurs when both parties fulfill their obligations entirely, leading to the successful conclusion of the contract. Substantial Performance: Involves fulfilling the primary and essential terms of the contract, but with minor deviations. The non-breaching party is generally still obligated to fulfill their side of the bargain. Material Breach: Occurs when there is a significant and unjustified deviation from the contract's terms, allowing the non-breaching party to be relieved of their obligations. Anticipatory Breach. Anticipatory breach, or anticipatory repudiation, happens when one party clearly communicates an intention not to fulfill their contractual obligations before the performance is due. Understanding the implications of anticipatory breach is crucial: Rights of the Non-Breaching Party: The non-breaching party can treat the anticipatory breach as immediate and seek remedies for breach of contract. Affirmation: If the non-breaching party continues to treat the contract as valid despite the anticipatory breach, they may lose the right to claim immediate remedies. Excuses for Non-Performance. Certain situations may excuse a party from performing their contractual obligations. Law students should be familiar with the following concepts: Impossibility of Performance: When performance becomes objectively impossible, such as due to destruction of the subject matter, the party may be excused from performance. Impracticability: If performance becomes significantly more difficult or expensive due to unforeseen circumstances, it may be excused. Frustration of Purpose: When the purpose of the contract is frustrated by unforeseen events, performance may be excused. Landmark Case: Hochster v De La Tour (1853). Hochster v De La Tour is a notable case illustrating anticipatory breach. De La Tour, the employer, breached the employment contract by dismissing Hochster before the start date. The court ruled that Hochster could immediately sue for breach of contract, recognizing the validity of anticipatory breach claims. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Challenges to Search Warrants: Affidavits and Probable Cause. While search warrants are powerful tools, they are not immune to challenges. We'll discuss how defense attorneys may challenge the validity of search warrants, focusing on issues related to the supporting affidavit and the establishment of probable cause. Understanding these challenges is essential for both prosecution and defense in criminal cases. Evolving Standards: Reasonable Expectation of Privacy. The concept of a "reasonable expectation of privacy" is central to Fourth Amendment analysis. We'll explore how this standard has evolved over time, considering landmark cases such as Katz v United States. As technology continues to reshape our understanding of privacy, how do courts adapt their interpretation of what is considered reasonable? Intersection with the Fifth Amendment: Self-Incrimination and Searches. The Fifth Amendment protects individuals from self-incrimination, and its intersection with the Fourth Amendment is crucial. We'll discuss scenarios where searches may implicate the right against self-incrimination, examining cases like Schmerber v California, which addressed the admissibility of compelled blood tests. Racial Profiling and Unlawful Stops: Constitutional Implications. An ongoing concern in search and seizure law is the potential for racial profiling and unlawful stops. We'll explore how the Fourth Amendment intersects with issues of race and law enforcement, considering cases that have examined the constitutionality of stops based on factors like race or ethnicity. International Human Rights and Search and Seizure. Beyond domestic legal considerations, international human rights principles also play a role in shaping search and seizure law. We'll briefly touch on how treaties and agreements impact the admissibility of evidence obtained through searches in countries with different legal standards. Introduction to Interrogations: Balancing Law Enforcement and Individual Rights. Interrogations are a key component of criminal investigations. Law enforcement officers use various techniques to obtain information from suspects. However, the methods employed raise important questions about the balance between effective investigation and protecting individual rights. We'll explore the evolution of interrogation practices and the legal principles governing them. Miranda v Arizona: Establishing the Right to Remain Silent. The landmark case of Miranda v Arizona (1966) fundamentally transformed the landscape of criminal procedure. The Supreme Court held that individuals must be informed of their right to remain silent and have an attorney present during custodial interrogations. We'll delve into the details of the Miranda decision, its rationale, and its impact on law enforcement practices. Custodial Interrogations: Defining the Threshold. Understanding when a suspect is considered in custody is crucial in determining when Miranda rights must be invoked. We'll explore the concept of custodial interrogations, examining how the courts determine whether a reasonable person would feel free to leave and the implications of custodial status on the admissibility of statements. Invoking and Waiving Miranda Rights: Legal and Practical Considerations. Once Miranda rights are invoked, individuals have the option to remain silent and have an attorney present. We'll discuss the legal and practical considerations surrounding the invocation and waiver of Miranda rights. What constitutes a valid waiver, and how does the voluntariness of a confession come into play? Exceptions to Miranda: Public Safety and Spontaneous Utterances. While Miranda provides crucial protections, there are exceptions. In situations where there is an imminent threat to public safety or when suspects make spontaneous statements, Miranda warnings may be bypassed. We'll examine cases that illustrate these exceptions and discuss the delicate balance between public safety and individual rights. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Understanding Estates in Land. Estates in land are the various levels of ownership rights one can have in real property. Let's break down some key concepts: Fee Simple Estate. The fee simple estate represents the highest form of ownership, providing the owner with the broadest rights possible. They have the right to use, sell, lease, and pass the property to heirs. Life Estates. A life estate grants ownership for the duration of a person's life. After the individual's death, the property reverts to the grantor or passes to another designated individual. Concurrent Estates. Now, let's navigate the complexities of concurrent estates. These are situations where more than one person simultaneously holds an estate in the same piece of property. Joint Tenancy vs Tenancy in Common. In joint tenancy, co-owners have a right of survivorship. If one owner dies, their interest automatically passes to the surviving joint tenant(s). On the other hand, tenancy in common allows for individual shares of ownership, and there is no right of survivorship. Legal Rights and Responsibilities. Understanding these estates is not just about ownership but also about the legal rights and responsibilities associated with them. From the right to exclusive possession to responsibilities for property maintenance, each estate comes with its set of rules. Case Studies. Now, let's delve into some case studies to illustrate these concepts. Real-world examples help solidify theoretical knowledge. Case 1: Johnson v Smith. In Johnson v. Smith, a dispute over joint tenancy rights unfolded. Mr. Johnson and Mr. Smith jointly owned a property. When Mr. Johnson passed away, the question arose: does Mr. Smith inherit the entire property as a surviving joint tenant, or does it become part of Mr. Johnson's estate? The court, in its decision, clarified that joint tenancy comes with the right of survivorship. This means that when one joint tenant dies, their interest automatically passes to the surviving joint tenant(s). Therefore, Mr. Smith became the sole owner of the property, highlighting the importance of understanding the nuances of co-ownership and the implications it can have on property rights. Case 2: The Thompson Estate. Turning our attention to The Thompson Estate, we encounter a scenario where a life estate impacted the distribution of property assets upon the death of the life tenant, Mrs. Thompson. In her will, Mrs. Thompson granted her daughter a life estate in their family home, with the remainder to be distributed among other heirs after the daughter's passing. Upon Mrs. Thompson's death, the daughter became the life tenant, and the property's ownership structure changed. This case sheds light on the complexities of life estates, emphasizing the need for clarity in estate planning. It underscores the importance of drafting precise and unambiguous terms when establishing life estates to avoid potential disputes among heirs. Application in Practice. To bring it all together, we'll explore how these concepts apply in real-life scenarios. Whether you're a future property owner, landlord, or legal professional, understanding estates in land is crucial. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Understanding Defenses in Tort Law. Defenses in tort cases are legal strategies and arguments used by defendants to counter claims brought against them. These defenses can vary based on the type of tort involved, the circumstances of the case, and the applicable legal principles. Common Defenses in Tort Law. Let's explore some common defenses used in tort cases: Contributory Negligence: This defense argues that the plaintiff's own negligence or carelessness contributed to their injuries. In jurisdictions that follow contributory negligence, if the plaintiff is found even slightly negligent, they may be barred from recovering any damages. Example: In a car accident case, the defendant might argue that the plaintiff was also distracted while driving, contributing to the collision. Comparative Negligence: In jurisdictions that adopt comparative negligence, the defendant argues that the plaintiff's negligence contributed to their injuries. However, under comparative negligence, the plaintiff's recovery is reduced in proportion to their degree of fault, rather than being completely barred. Example: In a slip and fall case, the defendant might argue that the plaintiff was not paying attention to warning signs, contributing to the fall. Assumption of Risk: This defense asserts that the plaintiff voluntarily assumed the risks associated with the activity that led to their injuries. Example: In a sporting event, the defendant might argue that the plaintiff willingly participated and accepted the risks of injury. Statute of Limitations: This defense asserts that the plaintiff's claim is barred by the applicable statute of limitations. Statutes of limitations set a time limit for bringing legal action, and once that time has passed, the plaintiff cannot pursue a claim. Example: If a plaintiff tries to bring a lawsuit for a car accident that happened five years ago, the defendant might raise the defense of the statute of limitations. Immunity: Immunity can arise from specific circumstances. For example, certain government entities may enjoy immunity from certain tort claims, while charitable organizations may have immunity under certain conditions. Example: A government agency might assert immunity in a case involving alleged negligence in a public service. Affirmative Defenses. In addition to the common defenses mentioned earlier, some tort claims involve affirmative defenses, which require the defendant to present evidence supporting their defense. Affirmative defenses can include: Self-Defense: When a person reasonably believes they are in imminent danger of harm, they have the right to use reasonable force to defend themselves. This defense can be asserted in cases involving assault or battery. Example: In a case where someone is accused of assault, they might argue that they acted in self-defense because they believed they were in danger. Defense of Others: Similar to self-defense, a person may use reasonable force to protect another person who is in imminent danger. Example: If someone intervenes in a fight to protect a friend, they might raise the defense of defense of others. Defense of Property: Individuals have the right to use reasonable force to protect their property from being invaded or stolen. However, this force must be proportionate to the threat. Example: If someone uses force to prevent a trespasser from stealing their car, they might assert the defense of defense of property. Consent: If the plaintiff consented to the defendant's actions, knowing the risks involved, it can serve as a complete defense. Example: In a case where someone is injured during a recreational activity, the defendant might argue that the plaintiff consented to the risks inherent in the activity. Superseding Cause: This defense asserts that an unforeseeable event or action occurred after the defendant's conduct but before the harm, and this event was the primary cause of the harm, relieving the defendant of liability. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

The Significance of Legislative History. 1. Exploration of Legislative History as a Source of Interpretation. Legislative history refers to the record of deliberations, debates, and documents generated during the drafting and passage of a law. Analyzing legislative history can shed light on the framers' intentions and the problems they sought to address. Significance: Legislative history is a valuable tool in constitutional interpretation. It helps courts understand the context in which a law was created, providing insights into the framers' goals and the societal issues they aimed to resolve. Example: In the case of District of Columbia v Heller (2008), which dealt with the Second Amendment and the right to bear arms, the Supreme Court analyzed the legislative history of the Second Amendment to understand the framers' intent. The Importance of Congressional Intent. 1. Understanding the Importance of Congressional Intent. The intent of the legislature, often referred to as congressional intent, holds a central place in constitutional analysis. Courts aim to discern the purpose and objectives that lawmakers had in mind when enacting a law. Significance: Congressional intent provides a guiding principle in constitutional interpretation. It ensures that the courts are aligned with the legislature's goals, preventing laws from being interpreted in ways contrary to the intentions of those who drafted and passed them. Example: In the case of Chevron USA Inc v Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. (1984), the Supreme Court emphasized the importance of deferring to an agency's interpretation of ambiguous statutes when Congress's intent is unclear. Techniques for Researching and Analyzing Legislative History. 1. Exploration of Techniques for Researching Legislative History. Researching legislative history involves examining a variety of documents, including committee reports, floor debates, and conference reports. This comprehensive approach helps uncover the nuances of legislative intent. Techniques: Committee Reports: These reports often contain detailed explanations of a bill's provisions and the problems it seeks to address. Floor Debates: Transcripts of debates can provide insights into lawmakers' views on specific provisions and their understanding of the law. Conference Reports: These reports reconcile differences between the House and Senate versions of a bill, offering a clearer picture of the final legislative compromise. Significance: By employing these techniques, researchers and legal practitioners can construct a more holistic understanding of legislative intent. Example: In United States v Rutherford (1982), the Supreme Court examined legislative history to determine whether Congress intended the term "use of a firearm" to include brandishing a firearm. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Chapter 13: Third-Party Rights and Assignments. In this chapter, we explore the intricate world of third-party rights and assignments in contract law. Contracts often involve more than just the parties who originally entered into them. Third parties can have rights and obligations under a contract, and contractual rights can be transferred or assigned to others. Understanding these concepts is crucial for any aspiring lawyer to navigate the complexities of contract law effectively. Third-Party Beneficiaries. Introduction to Third-Party Beneficiaries. In contract law, a third-party beneficiary is an individual or entity who benefits from a contract between two other parties but is not one of the contracting parties themselves. Understanding the concept of third-party beneficiaries is essential for law students: Intended Beneficiary: An intended third-party beneficiary is someone for whom the contract was specifically created to benefit. They have the legal right to enforce the contract. Incidental Beneficiary: An incidental third-party beneficiary is someone who benefits from a contract indirectly but was not the intended recipient of the contract's benefits. Incidental beneficiaries do not have the right to enforce the contract. 13.1.2 Rights of Intended Beneficiaries. Law students should grasp the rights and obligations of intended third-party beneficiaries: Enforcement Rights: Intended beneficiaries can typically enforce the contract and sue for specific performance or damages if the contracting parties fail to fulfill their obligations. Defenses: Contracting parties can raise defenses against intended beneficiaries if the beneficiary's claim is inconsistent with the parties' agreement. Landmark Case: Lawrence v Fox (1859). The case of Lawrence v. Fox illustrates the principle of third-party beneficiaries. In this case, a contract was made for the sale of a horse between A and B, with the understanding that the horse would be delivered to C. C was deemed an intended beneficiary and could enforce the contract. This case demonstrates the legal recognition of third-party beneficiary rights. Privity of Contract. Understanding the concept of privity of contract is crucial for comprehending third-party beneficiary rights. Privity of contract traditionally held that only parties who were in a direct contractual relationship (i.e., the original parties) could enforce or be held liable under the contract. Third-party beneficiaries represented a departure from this doctrine, allowing certain non-parties to enforce contracts. Assignment of Contractual Rights and Delegation of Duties. Assignment of Contractual Rights. Assigning contractual rights involves transferring one's rights under a contract to another party, known as the assignee. Law students should grasp the following key aspects: Requirements for Valid Assignment: An assignment is generally valid if it is in writing, the assigning party (assignor) intends to make the assignment, and the other party (obligor) is notified. Rights of the Assignee: Once rights are assigned, the assignee can typically enforce those rights against the obligor. Revocability: Assignments are usually revocable unless they are accompanied by consideration or are irrevocable by their terms. Delegation of Duties. Delegating duties involves transferring one's obligations under a contract to another party, known as the delegatee. Students should understand the following: Requirements for Valid Delegation: A delegation is valid if it does not significantly change the obligor's duties and if it does not violate the terms of the contract. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Consent Searches: Waiving Fourth Amendment Rights One exception to the warrant requirement is the consent search. When individuals voluntarily waive their Fourth Amendment rights and grant permission for a search, law enforcement can proceed without a warrant. However, understanding what constitutes valid consent is crucial. We'll examine the requirements and limitations surrounding consent searches. Plain View Doctrine: Unanticipated Discoveries The plain view doctrine allows law enforcement to seize evidence that is in plain view during a lawful observation. We'll explore the parameters of this doctrine and how it applies to situations where law enforcement comes across evidence without actively searching for it. Stop and Frisk: Balancing Officer Safety and Individual Rights Terry v Ohio introduced the "stop and frisk" doctrine, enabling law enforcement to stop and briefly detain an individual if they have reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. This session will delve into the requirements for a valid stop and frisk, emphasizing the delicate balance between officer safety and protecting individuals from unreasonable searches. Border Searches: Balancing National Security and Privacy At the border, the government's interest in protecting national security sometimes clashes with individual privacy rights. We'll explore the scope of border searches, including searches of persons, vehicles, and electronic devices. Recent cases, like United States v Cotterman, have addressed the challenges posed by digital searches at the border. Emerging Issues in Search and Seizure Law: Technology and Privacy The digital age has ushered in new challenges for search and seizure law. How does the Fourth Amendment apply to emerging technologies like drones, facial recognition, and other surveillance tools? We'll discuss recent cases and legal debates surrounding the intersection of technology and privacy rights. International Implications: Extradition and Evidence Search and seizure issues extend beyond national borders, especially in cases involving extradition and the gathering of evidence from foreign jurisdictions. We'll explore how international law intersects with Fourth Amendment principles, considering cases that have tested the limits of extraterritorial searches. Practical Skills: Drafting Search Warrants Understanding the theoretical aspects of search and seizure law is essential, but practical skills are equally crucial. In this extended session, we'll delve into the art of drafting search warrants. What elements are necessary for a warrant to be valid? How can legal professionals ensure that warrants withstand judicial scrutiny? --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Overview of Property Law as a Bar Exam Subject. Property law holds a significant place in legal education and practice, particularly as a critical component of the bar exam. It's the legal framework that governs rights and interests in various forms of property. To grasp its importance, we need to appreciate the broad spectrum of property, encompassing both tangible and intangible assets. Tangible vs. Intangible Property. Tangible property includes physical assets like real estate and personal belongings, while intangible property involves non-physical assets such as intellectual property rights, patents, and trademarks. Fundamental Concepts and Distinctions. Now, let's delve into one of the foundational distinctions within property law: real property versus personal property. Real Property. Real property pertains to interests in land and anything attached to it. This includes not only the land itself but also structures like buildings, trees, and minerals beneath the surface. The legal rights associated with real property are extensive and form the basis of various legal doctrines. Personal Property. On the other hand, personal property encompasses movable items. It includes things like furniture, vehicles, and personal belongings. Understanding this distinction is crucial as it lays the groundwork for more nuanced discussions in the realm of property law. Historical Context and Evolution. To truly appreciate property law, we must step back in time and explore its historical context and evolution. Ancient Legal Systems. Property law's roots can be traced back to ancient legal systems, drawing influence from Roman and English legal traditions. These early foundations set the stage for the development of property rights and ownership. Modern Evolution. Fast forward to modern times, and we witness property law adapting to address contemporary challenges. It has evolved in response to technological advancements, environmental concerns, and shifting societal norms. Recognizing this evolution is vital for understanding the dynamic nature of property law in today's legal landscape. With this groundwork laid, we've only scratched the surface of Property Law. In our next session, we'll explore the intricate world of "Estates in Land," unraveling the different types of estates and the rights associated with them. So, stay tuned as we continue our journey through the depths of property law. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Defining Strict Liability. Strict liability is a legal doctrine that holds a party liable for certain actions or injuries regardless of their intent or level of care. Unlike negligence or intentional torts, strict liability focuses on the inherent risk associated with certain activities or products. Cases Where Strict Liability Applies. Strict liability commonly applies in the following situations: Ultra-Hazardous Activities: Activities that are inherently dangerous and pose a high risk of harm may give rise to strict liability. Examples include blasting, transporting hazardous materials, and keeping wild animals. Product Liability: Strict liability is often applied in cases involving defective products. If a product is defective and causes harm, the manufacturer or seller may be held strictly liable for the injuries. Elements of Strict Liability. To establish strict liability, certain elements must be present: Engaging in an Ultra-Hazardous Activity or Product Defect: The defendant must either engage in an ultra-hazardous activity or be involved in the production or distribution of a defective product. Causation: The plaintiff must establish that the harm suffered was a result of the ultra-hazardous activity or the defect in the product. Harm: Like other tort claims, the plaintiff must have suffered harm or damages as a result of the defendant's actions. Ultra-Hazardous Activities. Ultra-hazardous activities are those that involve a high degree of risk of harm, even when conducted with utmost care. Some factors that may determine whether an activity is ultra-hazardous include: High Risk of Harm: The activity must pose a high risk of harm, even when conducted with reasonable care. Inability to Eliminate Risk: The risk associated with the activity must be such that it cannot be completely eliminated, regardless of the precautions taken. Not a Common Activity: The activity should not be a common one in the community. Product Liability and Defective Products. In the realm of product liability, strict liability can be imposed for injuries caused by defective products. There are three main types of product defects that may lead to strict liability: Design Defects: These occur when the design of the product is inherently dangerous, making it defective even before it is manufactured. Manufacturing Defects: These defects arise during the manufacturing process, causing certain units of a product to be different from the intended design. Marketing Defects (Failure to Warn): A product may be defective if it lacks proper warnings or instructions regarding its use, resulting in harm to the consumer. Defenses to Strict Liability. While strict liability imposes liability without proving fault, there are some defenses available to defendants: Assumption of Risk: If the plaintiff voluntarily assumes the risk associated with the ultra-hazardous activity or the use of the product, it can serve as a defense. Contributory or Comparative Negligence: In some jurisdictions, the plaintiff's own negligence in causing the harm may reduce or eliminate the defendant's liability. Product Misuse: If the plaintiff's misuse of the product is a substantial factor in causing the harm, it may be a defense. Case Example: Ultrahazardous Activity - Blasting Operation Imagine a scenario where a company engages in a blasting operation to clear a construction site. Despite taking all reasonable precautions, the blasting operation causes vibrations that result in damage to neighboring properties. In this case: Ultra-Hazardous Activity: Blasting is considered an ultra-hazardous activity due to its high risk of harm, even with reasonable care. Causation: The harm suffered by the neighboring properties is a direct result of the blasting operation. Case Example: Product Liability - Defective Automobile Airbags. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Case Law and Its Role in Constitutional Interpretation. 1. Examination of the Common Law Tradition. The common law tradition, inherited from English legal principles, forms the foundation of case law. In this tradition, judges' decisions in individual cases create legal precedents that guide future rulings. Significance: Case law provides an evolving body of legal principles that adapts to societal changes and addresses novel legal questions. This flexibility is particularly crucial in constitutional law, where interpretations may need to respond to evolving societal norms. Example: The common law tradition allows judges to interpret constitutional provisions in light of changing circumstances. For instance, the application of the Fourth Amendment to emerging technologies like smartphones has been shaped through case law. 2. The Role of Case Law in Constitutional Interpretation. Case law is instrumental in interpreting and applying constitutional provisions. Supreme Court decisions, in particular, set binding precedents that lower courts must follow. These decisions clarify constitutional principles and guide future rulings. Significance: The evolving nature of case law ensures that constitutional interpretations remain relevant and responsive to contemporary challenges. Supreme Court decisions, in particular, carry significant weight in shaping the legal landscape. Example: Brown v Board of Education (1954) is a landmark case that fundamentally altered constitutional interpretation, rejecting the "separate but equal" doctrine and declaring state laws establishing separate public schools for black and white students unconstitutional. Judicial Precedent in Constitutional Interpretation. 1. Understanding the Hierarchy of Courts. The U.S. legal system has a hierarchical structure of courts. Decisions made by higher courts, especially the Supreme Court, carry more weight as precedent than decisions by lower courts. This hierarchy ensures consistency and stability in the law. Significance: Supreme Court decisions are binding on all lower courts, creating a uniform interpretation of constitutional provisions across the country. However, the Court can also overturn its own precedent in certain circumstances. Example: When a federal district court in one state faces a constitutional question, it must follow the precedent set by the Supreme Court, ensuring a consistent application of constitutional principles. 2. Overview of Landmark Supreme Court Cases. Landmark Supreme Court cases play a pivotal role in constitutional interpretation. These decisions often involve issues of profound societal importance and shape the legal landscape for generations. Significance: Landmark cases establish important legal principles and interpretations that influence subsequent decisions. They are critical in defining and protecting constitutional rights. Example: Roe v Wade (1973) is a landmark case that recognized a woman's constitutional right to choose to have an abortion, based on the right to privacy implicit in the Constitution. 3. Role of Stare Decisis in Constitutional Law. Stare decisis, the principle of adhering to precedent, is fundamental in constitutional law. While the Court has the authority to overturn its own precedent, it generally follows established decisions to ensure stability and predictability in the law. Significance: Stare decisis contributes to the legitimacy of the legal system by providing consistency and fostering public confidence in the judiciary. Example: The principle of stare decisis was reaffirmed in Planned Parenthood v Casey (1992), where the Court upheld the essential holding of Roe v Wade, citing the importance of precedent in preserving the rule of law. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Introduction to Monetary Damages. Monetary damages, also known as compensatory damages, are the most common remedy for breach of contract. They aim to compensate the non-breaching party for their actual losses resulting from the breach. It's essential to understand the key principles of monetary damages: Direct Losses: Compensatory damages cover direct losses, such as the cost of completing the contract with another party. Foreseeability: Damages must have been foreseeable at the time of contract formation to be recoverable. Types of Monetary Damages. Monetary damages can take various forms, and it's crucial to comprehend the distinctions between them: General Damages: General damages compensate for the direct and natural losses that flow from the breach. They don't need to be specifically foreseeable but must arise in the usual course of events. Special Damages (Consequential Damages): Special damages go beyond direct losses and include additional costs or losses that result indirectly from the breach. Law students should understand the principles of consequential damages: Foreseeability: Like compensatory damages, consequential damages must have been foreseeable at the time of contract formation. Causation: There must be a clear causal link between the breach and the consequential damages. Incidental Damages: Incidental damages are the additional costs incurred by the non-breaching party as a result of the breach. These damages are typically recoverable when they are reasonably incurred to mitigate losses. Specific Performance. Introduction to Specific Performance. Specific performance is an equitable remedy available when monetary damages are inadequate to compensate for the breach. This remedy requires the breaching party to perform their contractual obligations. Law students should understand the key aspects of specific performance: Availability: Specific performance is typically available for contracts involving unique goods or services where monetary compensation would not adequately remedy the breach. Court Discretion: Courts have discretion in granting specific performance, considering factors like feasibility, fairness, and the unique nature of the contract. Restitution and Rescission. Restitution. Restitution is a remedy aimed at restoring the parties to their pre-contract positions. Law students should understand the principles of restitution: Return of Benefits: Restitution often requires the parties to return any benefits or consideration they received under the contract. Rescission. Rescission is the process of canceling or undoing a contract. It can occur by mutual agreement of the parties or by court order, typically due to factors like fraud, misrepresentation, or lack of capacity. Landmark Case: Lumley v Wagner (1852). The case of Lumley v Wagner is a notable example of specific performance. In this case, a singer contracted to perform exclusively at a particular venue. She later agreed to sing at a rival venue, breaching the exclusive contract. The court granted an injunction to prevent her from performing at the rival venue, enforcing specific performance of the contract. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Introduction to the Exclusionary Rule: The Exclusionary Rule is a legal doctrine that prohibits the use of evidence obtained in violation of an individual's Fourth Amendment rights. This rule serves as a safeguard to ensure law enforcement complies with constitutional protections when conducting searches and seizures. The Exclusionary Rule is a fundamental legal doctrine in the realm of criminal procedure. Its primary purpose is to safeguard an individual's Fourth Amendment rights in the context of searches and seizures. But what exactly does this rule entail, and why is it so significant? The Exclusionary Rule essentially states that any evidence obtained in violation of an individual's Fourth Amendment rights is inadmissible in court. This rule acts as a powerful deterrent, compelling law enforcement to comply with constitutional protections when conducting searches and seizures. It serves to maintain the delicate balance between effective law enforcement and protecting the individual rights enshrined in the Constitution. History and Significance: We'll begin by tracing the historical development of the Exclusionary Rule. This rule was established through landmark cases such as Weeks v United States and Mapp v Ohio. These cases shaped the rule's significance in protecting the Fourth Amendment rights of individuals.To truly appreciate the Exclusionary Rule, we must explore its historical development and its pivotal significance. The rule as we know it today was not always in place; it evolved through a series of landmark cases. One such case is Weeks v United States (1914). In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that evidence obtained through an illegal search and seizure was inadmissible in federal courts. This decision marked the birth of the Exclusionary Rule, albeit initially applicable only at the federal level. Mapp v Ohio (1961) brought a profound transformation. In this case, the Supreme Court extended the Exclusionary Rule to apply to state courts. It held that the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures must be enforced uniformly across all jurisdictions. Mapp v Ohio thus marked a significant turning point in the rule's history, making it a national standard. The Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Doctrine: Under the doctrine of "fruit of the poisonous tree," evidence that is derived from an initial illegal search or seizure is also inadmissible. We will explore the nuances of this doctrine and examine cases where it has been applied. A vital aspect of the Exclusionary Rule is the "fruit of the poisonous tree" doctrine. This principle states that evidence derived from an initial illegal search or seizure is also tainted and, therefore, inadmissible. In essence, if the "tree" (the original illegality) is poisonous, its "fruit" (evidence derived from it) is likewise tainted. Understanding the nuances of this doctrine is critical for grasping the Exclusionary Rule's reach and impact. It ensures that the rule is not easily circumvented by law enforcement attempting to indirectly benefit from an initial constitutional violation. Exceptions to the Exclusionary Rule: While the Exclusionary Rule is a powerful tool to deter unlawful searches, there are exceptions. We will discuss situations where evidence may still be admissible, even if it was obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment. This includes the "good faith" exception and inevitable discovery doctrine. While the Exclusionary Rule is a potent tool to deter unlawful searches, it's not without exceptions. One key exception is the "good faith" exception. This exception allows for the admission of evidence obtained in good faith by law enforcement officers who, at the time, believed they were acting in accordance with the law. We'll explore the intricacies of this exception and its implications. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Introduction to Criminal Law. Purpose and principles of criminal law. Purpose and principles of criminal law: This session introduces the fundamental principles of criminal law, emphasizing its role in defining and punishing wrongful conduct within society. Elements of a crime: Actus Reus and Mens Rea. Actus Reus refers to the physical act or conduct that constitutes a criminal offense. Mens Rea refers to the mental state or intent behind the criminal act. It involves the guilty mind or the intent to commit the offense. Categories of crimes: Felonies vs. Misdemeanors Felonies are serious criminal offenses that typically carry severe penalties, including imprisonment for more than one year. Misdemeanors are less serious offenses, often resulting in less severe penalties, such as a jail sentence of one year or less. Model Penal Code (MPC) vs. Common Law Approach Purpose and principles of criminal law: This session introduces the fundamental principles of criminal law, emphasizing its role in defining and punishing wrongful conduct within society. The Model Penal Code (MPC) is a modern legal framework used in some jurisdictions to codify and standardize criminal laws, making them more consistent and coherent. The Common Law Approach relies on judicial decisions and precedents to define and interpret criminal laws. Homicide. Overview of homicide as a crime. Murder: Degrees and elements. Case Study: State v Johnson - Applying degrees of murder. Overview of homicide as a crime: Homicide is the unlawful killing of another person and is considered a criminal offense. Murder: Degrees and elements: Murder involves the intentional killing of another person, with degrees (first-degree, second-degree) defining the level of intent and severity of the crime. Assault and Battery. Defining assault and battery. Distinction between assault and battery. Assault with intent vs. simple assault. Case Study: People v Ramirez - Analyzing assault charges. Defining assault and battery: Assault is the threat of physical harm, while battery is the actual physical harm caused to another person. Distinction between assault and battery: Assault involves the threat of harm, whereas battery involves the actual application of force or contact. Assault with intent vs. simple assault: Assault with intent implies an intention to harm, while simple assault lacks specific intent to harm. Theft Crimes. Types of theft crimes. Legal elements of theft crimes. Case Study: State v Smith - Analyzing theft charges Types of theft crimes: Theft crimes encompass various offenses, including larceny, embezzlement, and robbery, involving the unlawful taking of someone else's property. Legal elements of theft crimes: These elements typically include taking, intent to permanently deprive, and the lack of consent. Sexual Offenses. Legal definitions and elements of sexual offenses. Consent and consent laws. Case Study: Commonwealth v Anderson - Analyzing a sexual assault case. Legal definitions and elements of sexual offenses: These offenses involve sexual misconduct and are defined by specific elements that must be proven in court. Consent and consent laws: Consent laws govern the requirement for voluntary and informed consent in sexual activities. Defenses to Criminal Liability. Insanity defense and its rules (M'Naghten, Irresistible Impulse, Durham). Self-defense and its elements. Case Study: State v Thompson - Analyzing self-defense claim. Insanity defense and its rules (M'Naghten, Irresistible Impulse, Durham): The insanity defense is based on a defendant's mental state at the time of the offense and is assessed under various legal standards, including M'Naghten, Irresistible Impulse, and Durham rules. Self-defense and its elements: Self-defense is a defense that justifies using force to protect oneself or others and involves elements such as the reasonable belief of an imminent threat. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Defining Intentional Torts. Intentional torts are civil wrongs where the defendant intentionally commits an act that results in harm to the plaintiff. Unlike negligence, where the focus is on the defendant's failure to exercise reasonable care, intentional torts involve the defendant's deliberate actions. Types of Intentional Torts. Intentional torts cover a broad spectrum of wrongful acts. Let's explore some common types: Assault: Assault occurs when one person intentionally puts another in reasonable apprehension of an imminent harmful or offensive contact. The key is the victim's reasonable fear. Battery: Battery involves the intentional and harmful or offensive touching of another person without their consent. It's not the harm caused but the intentional act of touching that defines battery. False Imprisonment: False imprisonment occurs when one person intentionally restricts another's freedom of movement within a bounded area without their consent. The victim must be aware of the confinement or harmed by it. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress: This tort involves intentional conduct that is extreme and outrageous, causing severe emotional distress to another person. Defamation: Defamation is the intentional publication of a false statement that harms the reputation of another person. It includes both written (libel) and spoken (slander) forms. Invasion of Privacy: Invasion of privacy comprises several intentional torts, such as intrusion into seclusion, publication of private facts, false light, and appropriation of likeness. Trespass to Land: Trespass to land occurs when a person intentionally enters the land of another without permission. It covers physical entry or causing an object to enter the land. Trespass to Chattels and Conversion: These torts involve intentional interference with another person's personal property. Trespass to chattels is a lesser interference, while conversion is a substantial interference or wrongful possession. Elements of Intentional Torts. To succeed in an intentional tort claim, certain elements must be established, including: Intent: The defendant must have the intent to commit the act that resulted in harm. Intent can be specific, intending the actual consequences, or general, intending the act but not necessarily the harm. Causation: The defendant's intentional act must be the actual cause of the harm suffered by the plaintiff. Harm: The plaintiff must have suffered harm or damages as a result of the defendant's intentional act. Defenses to Intentional Torts. Defendants in intentional tort cases have several defenses at their disposal: Consent: If the plaintiff consented to the defendant's actions, knowing the risks involved, it can serve as a complete defense. Self-Defense: Individuals have the right to use reasonable force to defend themselves from an imminent threat. Defense of Others: Similar to self-defense, a person may use reasonable force to protect another person who is in imminent danger. Defense of Property: Individuals have the right to use reasonable force to protect their property from being invaded or stolen. Privilege: Certain statements made in specific contexts, such as in courtrooms or legislative proceedings, are protected by privilege and are not subject to defamation claims. Case Example: Assault and Battery. Imagine a scenario where Person A threatens to punch Person B and then proceeds to strike them, causing physical harm. In this case: Assault: The threat by Person A to punch Person B puts Person B in reasonable apprehension of imminent harmful contact. This constitutes assault. Battery: The intentional act of Person A striking Person B, causing physical harm, constitutes battery. The key is the intentional act of touching, regardless of the harm caused. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Introduction to Statutory Law. Statutory law refers to laws passed by a legislative body, such as Congress, at the federal level or state legislatures. These laws address a wide range of issues, from criminal offenses and civil rights to environmental regulations and tax policies. Significance: Statutory law plays a crucial role in shaping constitutional interpretation. It can define and clarify the rights and responsibilities of individuals, government agencies, and other entities. Additionally, statutes can fill gaps in constitutional law or provide specific guidance on how to implement constitutional principles. Example: The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a federal statute that addresses discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. It complements the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause by providing specific protections against discrimination in areas such as employment and public accommodations. Relationship Between Statutory Law and Constitutional Rights. The relationship between statutory law and constitutional rights is multi-faceted. Statutes can reinforce constitutional rights, provide remedies for violations, or expand upon constitutional protections. Key aspects of this relationship include: 1. Reinforcing Constitutional Rights. Statutory laws can reinforce and clarify constitutional rights. For example, the Voting Rights Act of 1965 was enacted to eliminate racial discrimination in voting, further upholding the principles of the Fifteenth Amendment. 2. Providing Remedies for Violations. Statutes often provide remedies for individuals whose constitutional rights have been violated. They can establish mechanisms for legal action, such as lawsuits, to seek redress when rights are infringed upon. 3. Expanding Constitutional Protections. In some cases, statutory laws expand upon the protections provided by the Constitution. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), for instance, extends protections to individuals with disabilities in various areas, ensuring equal access and opportunities. Significance: Statutory laws are tools that legislators use to address specific issues and challenges in society. They can be instrumental in enforcing constitutional rights, providing redress for violations, and adapting the legal framework to evolving social and technological changes. Example: The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) is a federal statute that ensures that students with disabilities receive a free and appropriate public education. It operationalizes the constitutional principle of equal protection and nondiscrimination for students with disabilities. Major Federal Statutes Impacting Constitutional Law. Several major federal statutes have had a significant impact on constitutional law. Let's explore a few of these statutes and their implications: 1. The Civil Rights Act of 1964. This landmark statute prohibits discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. It addresses issues related to employment, education, and public accommodations, reinforcing the principles of equal protection and due process. Significance: The Civil Rights Act has been a cornerstone of civil rights law, enforcing the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause and the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause. 2. The Voting Rights Act of 1965. The Voting Rights Act aimed to eliminate racial discrimination in voting. It provides mechanisms to ensure that individuals are not denied the right to vote on the basis of race or language minority status. Significance: This statute enforces the Fifteenth Amendment's prohibition on racial discrimination in voting. 3. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The ADA prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in employment, public services, and public accommodations. It ensures equal access and opportunities for individuals with disabilities. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Introduction to Express Warranties. Express warranties are promises, affirmations, or descriptions of fact made by the seller to the buyer as part of the basis of the bargain. These warranties can be explicit statements about the product's quality, performance, or characteristics. It's essential for law students to understand the key elements of express warranties: Statements and Promises: Express warranties can be created through statements, affirmations, or promises made by the seller. Basis of the Bargain: The representation must be part of the basis of the bargain. In other words, the buyer must rely on the statement when making the purchase. Implied Warranties. Implied warranties are inherent in every sale of goods, whether or not they are expressly stated. They are not explicitly promised by the seller but are implied by law. Law students should grasp the two primary forms of implied warranties: Implied Warranty of Merchantability: This warranty guarantees that the product is fit for the ordinary purposes for which it is used. In essence, it must meet the standards for what is considered acceptable in the trade. Implied Warranty of Fitness for a Particular Purpose: This warranty applies when the buyer relies on the seller's expertise to select a product suitable for a specific use. If the seller knows the buyer's purpose and recommends a product, it implicitly warrants the product's fitness for that purpose. Disclaiming and Limiting Warranties. Warranties, both express and implied, can be disclaimed or limited. It is vital to understand the legal mechanisms for doing so: Disclaimers: A seller may disclaim warranties in clear and unambiguous language. However, there are legal limits on disclaimers for implied warranties, especially the implied warranty of merchantability. Limitations: Sellers can also limit their liability for breach of warranty in certain cases, such as limiting the buyer's remedies. These limitations must be fair and reasonable. Product Liability. Introduction to Product Liability. Product liability is a field of law that deals with the responsibility of manufacturers and sellers for injuries caused by their products. It encompasses issues related to product defects, warnings, and the safety of products. Key points include: Three Main Theories: Product liability cases generally revolve around three main theories: strict liability, negligence, and breach of warranty. Consumer Protection: Product liability law serves as a critical aspect of consumer protection. It holds manufacturers and sellers accountable for producing and distributing safe products. Strict Liability in Product Liability. The Concept of Strict Liability. Strict liability is a legal doctrine that holds manufacturers and sellers responsible for injuries caused by defective products, regardless of whether they were negligent. This doctrine significantly affects product liability cases: Elements of Strict Liability: To establish strict liability, the plaintiff must typically demonstrate that the product was unreasonably dangerous and that the defect caused their injury. No Need to Prove Negligence: Unlike negligence claims, plaintiffs pursuing a strict liability claim do not need to prove that the manufacturer or seller was negligent. Types of Product Defects. There are three primary types of product defects under the theory of strict liability, and students should have a comprehensive understanding of each: Design Defects: These are inherent flaws in a product's design that render it unsafe for its intended use. Manufacturing Defects: Manufacturing defects occur during the production process and make individual products dangerous. Marketing Defects (Failure to Warn): These defects pertain to inadequate warnings or instructions related to product use. Negligence in Product Liability. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Criminal procedure focuses on the rules and principles that govern how evidence is obtained and used in criminal cases. It ensures that the legal system operates fairly, protecting the rights of both the accused and the state. To begin, let's understand the basic structure of criminal procedure: To truly understand the rules and principles governing criminal trials, search and seizure, Miranda rights, and the rights of the accused, we need to explore these concepts in more detail. Due Process and Its Evolution: Due process is a fundamental concept in criminal procedure. It ensures that individuals are treated fairly and justly by the legal system. Over the years, due process has evolved, with the Supreme Court continuously refining and expanding upon its meaning. We'll discuss landmark cases that have shaped due process, such as Gideon v Wainwright and Miranda v Arizona. Search and Seizure: The Fourth Amendment: The Fourth Amendment is a cornerstone of criminal procedure. It protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures by law enforcement. Understanding what constitutes a "reasonable" search and the various exceptions to this rule is essential. We'll cover scenarios like vehicle searches, consent searches, and the exclusionary rule, which excludes illegally obtained evidence from trial. Miranda Rights in Practice: Beyond the famous "You have the right to remain silent..." warning, we'll explore how Miranda rights are applied in real-life situations. This includes custodial interrogations, the voluntariness of statements, and the exceptions to Miranda. Rights of the Accused in the Courtroom: A fair trial is a constitutional right. We'll discuss the right to an attorney, the right to confront witnesses, and the right against double jeopardy. Additionally, we'll touch on the concept of "fruit of the poisonous tree," which relates to evidence obtained illegally and its admissibility in court. Challenges in Contemporary Criminal Procedure: In modern times, criminal procedure faces new challenges, especially in the digital age. How do the principles we've discussed apply to electronic surveillance, cybercrime, and issues related to privacy and technology? Due Process and Its Evolution: Due process is a fundamental concept in criminal procedure. It ensures that individuals are treated fairly and justly by the legal system. Over the years, due process has evolved, with the Supreme Court continuously refining and expanding upon its meaning. We'll discuss landmark cases that have shaped due process, such as Gideon v Wainwright and Miranda v Arizona. Search and Seizure: The Fourth Amendment: The Fourth Amendment is a cornerstone of criminal procedure. It protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures by law enforcement. Understanding what constitutes a "reasonable" search and the various exceptions to this rule is essential. We'll cover scenarios like vehicle searches, consent searches, and the exclusionary rule, which excludes illegally obtained evidence from trial. Miranda Rights in Practice: Beyond the famous "You have the right to remain silent..." warning, we'll explore how Miranda rights are applied in real-life situations. This includes custodial interrogations, the voluntariness of statements, and the exceptions to Miranda. Rights of the Accused in the Courtroom: A fair trial is a constitutional right. We'll discuss the right to an attorney, the right to confront witnesses, and the right against double jeopardy. Additionally, we'll touch on the concept of "fruit of the poisonous tree," which relates to evidence obtained illegally and its admissibility in court. Challenges in Contemporary Criminal Procedure: In modern times, criminal procedure faces new challenges, especially in the digital age. How do the principles we've discussed apply to electronic surveillance, cybercrime, and issues related to privacy and technology? --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Duty to Clients: Zealous Advocacy and Confidentiality. Lawyers have a fundamental duty to their clients. This duty includes: Zealous Advocacy: Lawyers must provide competent and diligent representation, advancing their clients' interests within the bounds of the law. This means vigorously advocating for their clients and putting their clients' interests first. Confidentiality: Lawyers are obligated to keep client information confidential. This attorney-client privilege encourages open communication and trust between lawyers and their clients. Duty to the Court: Candor and Professionalism. Lawyers also have an ethical duty to the court. This duty includes: Candor: Lawyers must be honest and forthright in their interactions with the court. This includes not presenting false evidence, making misleading statements, or engaging in any dishonest practices. Professionalism: Lawyers are expected to conduct themselves with professionalism and respect in all court proceedings. This includes courtesy towards judges, opposing counsel, and witnesses. Conflict of Interest: Avoiding Dual Loyalties. Lawyers must navigate potential conflicts of interest that could compromise their duty to clients or the court. Conflicts of interest may arise when a lawyer has competing obligations or interests. Lawyers must be diligent in identifying and addressing such conflicts to ensure they do not harm their clients or the integrity of the legal system. Case Study: Smith v Johnson - A Conflict of Interest Dilemma. To illustrate the complexities of legal ethics, let's consider Smith v Johnson. In this case, Attorney Smith represents Client Johnson in a criminal matter. However, Attorney Smith's law firm also represents a key witness for the prosecution in the same case. This situation raises concerns about a potential conflict of interest. Now for our 1st question: What happens if an attorney discovers that their client has provided false information or perjured themselves during a trial? If an attorney discovers that their client has provided false information or perjured themselves during a trial, they face a challenging ethical dilemma. Attorneys have a duty of candor to the court, which means they cannot present false or misleading information to the court. However, they also have a duty to zealously advocate for their client's interests. In such situations, an attorney may consider options like: Withdrawal: If the attorney believes they cannot continue representing the client without violating ethical obligations, they may seek to withdraw from the case. Encouraging Honesty: The attorney should encourage the client to rectify the false statements, even if it means admitting wrongdoing. Consulting Ethics Rules: The attorney may consult the applicable ethical rules and seek guidance from their state's bar association on how to proceed. The specific course of action can vary depending on the facts of the case and the attorney's ethical obligations. Now for question 2: Can a lawyer represent a client if they personally believe the client is guilty? Yes, a lawyer can represent a client even if they personally believe the client is guilty. In the legal system, everyone is entitled to legal representation and a fair trial, regardless of their guilt or innocence. Lawyers have a duty to provide competent and zealous advocacy for their clients, which includes mounting a defense, ensuring that the prosecution meets its burden of proof, and protecting the client's rights. An attorney's personal beliefs about a client's guilt or innocence should not interfere with their ethical duty to provide effective representation. The attorney's role is to advocate for the client's interests and protect their rights within the bounds of the law. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Understanding Causation. Causation is the linchpin of tort law. It establishes the direct link between the defendant's actions and the plaintiff's injuries. In essence, it answers the question: Did the defendant's conduct cause the harm suffered by the plaintiff? Two Types of Causation. Causation is typically divided into two categories: Cause-in-Fact (Actual Cause): This aspect of causation examines whether the defendant's actions were the actual cause of the harm. In other words, would the harm have occurred if the defendant had not acted in the way they did? If the answer is no, the defendant's conduct is considered the cause-in-fact of the harm. Proximate Cause (Legal Cause): Proximate cause focuses on the foreseeability of the harm. It asks whether the harm was a foreseeable consequence of the defendant's actions. Proximate cause sets limits on liability, ensuring that defendants are not held responsible for incredibly remote or unforeseeable consequences of their conduct. Cause-in-Fact: "But For" Test. The cause-in-fact element is often determined using the "but for" test. This test asks whether the plaintiff's injuries would have occurred "but for" the defendant's actions. In simpler terms, it examines whether the harm would have happened if the defendant had not acted in the way they did. Proximate Cause: Foreseeability. Proximate cause, on the other hand, hinges on foreseeability. It asks whether a reasonable person could foresee that their actions might result in the harm suffered by the plaintiff. If the harm was not foreseeable, it may not be considered a proximate cause. Case Example: Car Accident. Consider a car accident case where Driver A runs a red light, collides with Driver B's car, and injures Driver B. In this scenario: Cause-in-fact: The cause-in-fact element is satisfied by the "but for" test. "But for" Driver A running the red light, the accident and Driver B's injuries would not have occurred. Proximate cause: Proximate cause, in this case, depends on whether a reasonable person could foresee that running a red light might result in a collision and injuries. If the collision and injuries were foreseeable consequences of running a red light, Driver A's actions would likely be considered the proximate cause. Challenges in Causation. Causation can present challenges, particularly in cases where multiple factors contribute to the harm. Some common issues include: Concurrent Causes: In cases where multiple factors or parties contribute to the harm, determining which party's actions were the actual cause can be complex. Intervening Causes: Intervening causes are unforeseeable events or actions that occur after the defendant's conduct but before the harm. They can break the chain of causation. Multiple Plaintiffs: In cases involving multiple plaintiffs, it may be challenging to establish causation for each plaintiff, especially if their injuries resulted from different aspects of the defendant's actions. Case Example: Slip and Fall in a Store. Imagine a scenario where a person slips and falls in a store, suffering injuries. The store's negligence is a potential cause of the injuries. However, if it is discovered that the person was also texting on their phone while walking, their distraction may be considered an intervening cause, breaking the chain of causation. Recent Developments in Causation. The concept of causation is continually evolving, influenced by societal changes, scientific advancements, and legal interpretations. Some recent developments and trends include: Advanced Forensic Science: The use of advanced forensic science has improved the ability to establish causation in cases involving complex injuries or diseases. Environmental Causation: In cases involving environmental harms, such as toxic exposure, courts are increasingly considering scientific evidence to determine causation. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Amendments Beyond the Bill of Rights. 1. The Fifteenth Amendment. The Fifteenth Amendment, ratified in 1870, is a pivotal component of the post-Civil War amendments. It prohibits the denial of voting rights based on an individual's race, color, or previous condition of servitude. Significance: The Fifteenth Amendment sought to enfranchise African American men who had been denied the right to vote in many parts of the United States due to racial discrimination and the legacy of slavery. It was a significant step toward achieving civil rights and political participation. Example: The Voting Rights Act of 1965, which aimed to eliminate racial discrimination in voting, draws its authority from the Fifteenth Amendment. It outlawed discriminatory voting practices like literacy tests and poll taxes. 2. The Nineteenth Amendment. The Nineteenth Amendment, ratified in 1920, granted women the right to vote. It marked a substantial expansion of suffrage and women's rights. Significance: The Nineteenth Amendment recognized the importance of gender equality in a democracy and extended the right to vote to over half of the U.S. population, promoting a more inclusive and representative democracy. Example: The women's suffrage movement, characterized by activists like Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton, played a significant role in advocating for the Nineteenth Amendment. 3. The Twenty-Sixth Amendment. The Twenty-Sixth Amendment, ratified in 1971, lowered the voting age from 21 to 18. It was a response to concerns about young people being drafted into the military to fight in the Vietnam War while not having the right to vote. Significance: This amendment recognized that individuals aged 18 to 20 who could be drafted into the military should also have the right to vote. It underscored the importance of equal representation and participation in the democratic process. Example: In the case of Oregon v. Mitchell (1970), the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of Congress's authority to lower the voting age, setting an important precedent. Interpretation of Constitutional Provisions. The interpretation of constitutional provisions is a dynamic process that shapes how the Constitution is applied to contemporary issues. The Supreme Court plays a central role in this process by rendering decisions that clarify the meaning of the Constitution. Landmark Supreme Court Cases. Landmark Supreme Court cases have significantly influenced the interpretation of the Constitution. Here are a few examples: Marbury v. Madison (1803): This case established the principle of judicial review, giving the Supreme Court the power to declare laws or actions of the government unconstitutional. Brown v. Board of Education (1954): This case declared state laws establishing separate public schools for black and white students unconstitutional, overturning the "separate but equal" doctrine. Roe v. Wade (1973): In this case, the Supreme Court recognized a woman's constitutional right to choose to have an abortion, based on the right to privacy. Citizens United v. FEC (2010): This case held that political spending by corporations is a form of protected speech under the First Amendment. Precedent in Shaping Constitutional Law. The doctrine of precedent, often referred to as "stare decisis," plays a critical role in shaping constitutional law. It means that courts should follow previous decisions, particularly those made by higher courts, when deciding similar cases. Significance: Precedent ensures consistency and predictability in the legal system. When a case is decided based on precedent, it helps maintain the rule of law and ensures that similar cases are treated similarly. Example: The principle of "separate but equal" in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) was overturned by Brown v. Board of Education (1954), setting a new precedent that segregation in public schools was unconstitutional. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Rules of Contract Interpretation. Introduction to Contract Interpretation. Contract interpretation is a meticulous process aimed at unraveling the meaning and intent concealed within the language of a contract. It's an area of contract law where every word and punctuation mark matters. Here are some fundamental principles of contract interpretation: Objective Standard: The cornerstone of contract interpretation is the objective intentions of the parties. In other words, we seek to ascertain what an objective, reasonable person would understand the contract to mean. Plain Meaning Rule: If a contract's language is clear and unambiguous, courts tend to interpret it according to its plain and ordinary meaning. In essence, if the words have a clear, commonly understood meaning, that meaning prevails. Ambiguity: Ambiguity is the adversary of contract clarity. It arises when the terms in a contract are unclear or capable of multiple interpretations. In such cases, courts may consider extrinsic evidence to decipher the parties' true intent. Extrinsic Evidence. Extrinsic evidence, while limited in its use, can be invaluable in deciphering ambiguous contract terms. Let's delve deeper into its role in contract interpretation: Parol Evidence Rule: This rule is a foundational concept in contract law. It restricts the use of extrinsic evidence to contradict or vary the terms of a fully integrated written contract. However, it allows the use of such evidence to interpret ambiguous terms. In essence, it permits looking beyond the written words to clarify unclear language. Integration: A contract is deemed integrated when it represents the final and complete agreement of the parties. Integrated contracts are less likely to be supplemented or contradicted by extrinsic evidence. It is, therefore, vital to determine whether a contract is integrated to understand the scope of extrinsic evidence allowed in its interpretation. Incorporation of Trade Usage and Course of Dealing. Trade Usage. Trade usage, often referred to as custom, is a practice or course of dealing that is commonly observed in a particular industry or trade. Trade usage plays a pivotal role in contract interpretation: Implied Terms: Trade usage can imply specific terms into a contract. For instance, in a contract for the sale of goods, trade usage may incorporate industry-standard quality standards or delivery times. It's akin to a silent agreement among professionals in a given field. Course of Performance: Trade usage can also be established through the course of performance, which is the history of prior transactions between the parties. Consistent adherence to certain practices over time can crystallize trade usage. Course of Dealing. Course of dealing is equally significant in contract interpretation. It involves considering the previous conduct and interactions between the parties in their prior transactions. Here's a more detailed exploration of course of dealing: Modification of Contract: The parties' course of dealing can be so consistent that it effectively modifies the terms of the contract. If there's a clear history of altering certain provisions in a particular way, that modification may become a contractual expectation. Supplementing Ambiguous Terms: In cases of ambiguous contract terms, the course of dealing can serve as a valuable reference point to interpret the ambiguous terms. It provides insight into how the parties have understood and performed under similar provisions in the past. Landmark Case: Masterson v Sine (1968). Masterson v Sine is a seminal case in contract law. It beautifully illustrates the principles of contract interpretation and the use of extrinsic evidence. Let's examine this case more closely: The case revolved around a dispute between two parties, Masterson and Sine, who had a contract involving real estate. The critical issue was the interpretation of a clause in the contract that dealt with a financing contingency. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Defining Hearsay: Understanding the fundamental concept of hearsay. Recognizing that hearsay involves out-of-court statements offered for the truth of the matter asserted. The Hearsay Rule: Learning the basic hearsay rule, which generally excludes hearsay evidence. Grasping the rationale behind this rule and its connection to the reliability of evidence. Hearsay Exceptions: Exploring various exceptions that allow certain hearsay statements to be admitted. Understanding the conditions and justifications for these exceptions. Confrontation Clause and Crawford v Washington: Learning about the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause. Analyzing the landmark Supreme Court case Crawford v Washington and its impact on hearsay. Case Study and Questions: Applying the principles of hearsay to a fictional case scenario. Addressing questions to test your knowledge of hearsay and its exceptions. Now, let's begin our exploration of hearsay evidence. 1. Defining Hearsay. Understanding the Fundamental Concept of Hearsay: Hearsay is a central concept in evidence law, and it refers to an out-of-court statement that is offered in court for the truth of the matter asserted in that statement. In other words, hearsay is when someone tries to prove the truth of a statement by offering another person's statement as evidence. This can include written or spoken statements made outside the courtroom. For example, if a witness in a trial says, "I heard John say that the defendant was at the scene of the crime," that statement is considered hearsay because it is offered to prove that the defendant was, indeed, at the scene of the crime. Recognizing that Hearsay Involves Out-of-Court Statements: Hearsay statements are typically made outside of the courtroom and are relayed to the court through witnesses. Courts generally regard hearsay as less reliable because the declarant (the person who made the out-of-court statement) is not under oath and subject to cross-examination when the statement is made. Hearsay evidence is often excluded because it poses a risk of inaccuracy, unreliability, and unfairness. However, there are exceptions to this rule that allow certain hearsay statements to be admitted based on principles of necessity and reliability. 2. The Hearsay Rule. Learning the Basic Hearsay Rule: The basic hearsay rule is simple: hearsay statements are generally not admissible as evidence in court. This rule is rooted in the idea that for evidence to be reliable, it must be subject to cross-examination, and out-of-court statements don't allow for this scrutiny. Grasping the Rationale Behind this Rule: The rationale behind the hearsay rule is to ensure that the evidence presented in court is trustworthy and accurate. By allowing only firsthand testimony and excluding statements made outside the courtroom, the legal system aims to prevent unreliable or fabricated evidence from being presented to the trier of fact. While the hearsay rule serves the purpose of safeguarding the integrity of the legal process, it is essential to understand that there are exceptions. These exceptions are grounded in the belief that certain types of hearsay statements are inherently reliable or necessary for justice to be served. 3. Hearsay Exceptions. Exploring Various Exceptions that Allow Certain Hearsay Statements to be Admitted: There are numerous exceptions to the hearsay rule, each with its own set of criteria and justifications for admissibility. Some common hearsay exceptions include: Excited Utterance: Statements made under the stress or excitement of a startling event are considered more reliable and may be admitted as an exception to hearsay. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

The Right to Appeal. The right to appeal a criminal conviction is a fundamental aspect of the justice system. It allows a convicted individual to challenge the verdict or the sentence imposed. Key points regarding the right to appeal include: Grounds for Appeal: Appeals can be based on various grounds, including errors in the trial process, legal misinterpretations, and newly discovered evidence. Appellate Courts: Appeals are typically heard by appellate courts, which review the decisions made by trial courts. Appellate courts do not re-try the case but instead examine the record for legal errors. Appellate Briefs: The appellant (the party appealing) and the appellee (the opposing party) submit written arguments called appellate briefs. These briefs present legal arguments and cite relevant precedents. Post-Conviction Remedies. In addition to appeals, individuals have access to post-conviction remedies. These remedies are typically used when new evidence comes to light or when a defendant's constitutional rights may have been violated during the trial. Common post-conviction remedies include: Writ of Habeas Corpus: This writ challenges the legality of a person's detention, often based on claims of constitutional violations. Motion for a New Trial: Defendants can seek a new trial if they can show that the original trial was unfair or that new evidence has emerged that could alter the outcome. Case Study: Smith v. State - Challenging a Conviction on Appeal To illustrate the appeals process, let's examine Smith v. State. In this case, the defendant has been convicted of a serious crime, but their legal counsel believes there were significant errors in the trial that warrant an appeal. The appellate process will involve submitting written briefs, presenting oral arguments, and ultimately seeking a review of the conviction by an appellate court. Now for our 1st question: How does the appeals process affect a defendant's sentence? The appeals process can have several outcomes that may affect a defendant's sentence. If the appeal results in the conviction being overturned, the defendant may be granted a new trial. During this new trial, the sentence can be reevaluated, and the defendant may receive a different sentence, potentially more lenient or, in some cases, more severe. If the appeal focuses solely on sentencing issues and not on the conviction itself, the court may reconsider the sentence, potentially leading to a reduction or modification in the sentence based on legal errors in the original sentencing. However, it's essential to note that appeals do not always result in a change in sentence. Now for our 2nd question: What are the potential outcomes of a habeas corpus petition? A habeas corpus petition is typically filed by individuals who are currently incarcerated and believe that their detention is unlawful. The potential outcomes of a habeas corpus petition can include: Release: If the court finds that the individual is being held unlawfully, they may be released from custody. New Trial: In some cases, the court may order a new trial, providing the defendant with another opportunity to challenge their conviction. Sentence Modification: The court may decide that the defendant's sentence was improperly calculated or applied and order a modification of the sentence. No Action: The court may also deny the petition, finding that there are no grounds for the writ of habeas corpus. The specific outcome depends on the facts and legal arguments presented in the petition and the decision of the court. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Defenses play a crucial role in the legal landscape. They are the shield that defendants wield in response to tort claims. In this episode, we'll dissect the world of defenses in Tort Law, understanding the various strategies and arguments that can be used to counter tort claims. Whether you're a law student, a legal practitioner, or just curious about the legal intricacies, this episode will provide you with a comprehensive understanding of the defenses available in tort cases. Understanding Defenses in Tort Law. Defenses in tort cases serve as a means for defendants to avoid or mitigate liability. They come in various forms and are rooted in legal principles. Let's explore some common defenses: Contributory Negligence: This defense argues that the plaintiff's own negligence or carelessness contributed to their injuries. In jurisdictions that follow contributory negligence, if the plaintiff is found even slightly negligent, they may be barred from recovering any damages. Comparative Negligence: In jurisdictions that adopt comparative negligence, the defendant argues that the plaintiff's negligence contributed to their injuries. However, under comparative negligence, the plaintiff's recovery is reduced in proportion to their degree of fault, rather than being completely barred. Assumption of Risk: This defense is based on the idea that the plaintiff knowingly and voluntarily assumed the risks associated with the activity that led to their injuries. For instance, a person who participates in an inherently dangerous sport may be considered to have assumed the risks involved. Statute of Limitations: This defense asserts that the plaintiff's claim is barred by the applicable statute of limitations. Statutes of limitations set a time limit for bringing legal action, and once that time has passed, the plaintiff cannot pursue a claim. Immunity: Immunity can arise from specific circumstances. For example, certain government entities may enjoy immunity from certain tort claims, while charitable organizations may have immunity under certain conditions. Good Samaritan Laws: In some jurisdictions, there are laws that protect individuals who voluntarily provide assistance to those who are injured or in danger. These laws are designed to encourage people to help without the fear of being sued for unintended consequences. Affirmative Defenses. In addition to the common defenses mentioned earlier, some tort claims involve affirmative defenses, which require the defendant to present evidence supporting their defense. Affirmative defenses can include: Self-Defense: When a person reasonably believes they are in imminent danger of harm, they have the right to use reasonable force to defend themselves. This defense can be asserted in cases involving assault or battery. Defense of Others: Similar to self-defense, a person may use reasonable force to protect another person who is in imminent danger. Defense of Property: Individuals have the right to use reasonable force to protect their property from being invaded or stolen. However, this force must be proportionate to the threat. Consent: If the plaintiff consented to the defendant's actions, knowing the risks involved, it can serve as a complete defense. For example, participants in contact sports are often considered to have consented to the physical contact inherent in the game. Superseding Cause: This defense asserts that an unforeseeable event or action occurred after the defendant's conduct but before the harm, and this event was the primary cause of the harm, relieving the defendant of liability. Defamation Defenses. In cases involving defamation, which refers to false statements that harm a person's reputation, defendants may raise specific defenses: Truth: If the statement is true, it is an absolute defense to defamation claims. Opinion: Expressing an opinion, rather than stating a false fact, is generally protected as free speech. However, there are limits to this defense. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Safeguarding Fair and Just Criminal Trials. The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution plays a pivotal role in ensuring that criminal defendants are afforded a fair and just trial. This amendment outlines a set of fundamental rights designed to protect individuals facing criminal charges and to preserve the integrity of the criminal justice system. Let's delve into the key components of the Sixth Amendment: 1. Right to a Fair and Speedy Trial. The Sixth Amendment grants individuals the right to a fair and speedy trial. This means that criminal cases should be resolved without undue delay, and defendants should have the opportunity to present their case promptly. Significance: The right to a speedy trial is essential to prevent individuals from languishing in jail for extended periods before trial. It also ensures that evidence and witnesses remain available and reliable. Example: If a person is arrested and charged with a crime, the government is obligated to bring the case to trial within a reasonable time. Delays caused by the prosecution or the court that prejudice the defendant's case may violate this right. 2. Right to Legal Counsel. The Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to legal counsel. Specifically, it states, "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right... to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense." Significance: The right to legal counsel ensures that individuals accused of crimes have access to competent representation to navigate the complexities of the legal system. Legal counsel plays a crucial role in safeguarding defendants' rights and ensuring a fair trial. Example: When an individual is charged with a crime, they have the right to an attorney. If they cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for them, typically a public defender, to represent their interests. 3. Right to Confront Witnesses. The Sixth Amendment grants the right "to be confronted with the witnesses against" the accused. This principle, known as the Confrontation Clause, means that individuals facing criminal charges have the right to confront and cross-examine the witnesses testifying against them. Significance: The Confrontation Clause is vital in ensuring that the accused can challenge the credibility and accuracy of witness testimony. It prevents the use of anonymous or secret witnesses. Example: If a witness provides testimony against a defendant in court, the defendant's attorney has the right to cross-examine that witness, asking questions to test the witness's credibility and accuracy. 4. Right to Compulsory Process. The Sixth Amendment includes the right "to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor." This means that individuals accused of a crime have the right to compel the attendance of favorable witnesses to testify on their behalf. Significance: The right to compulsory process empowers defendants to present evidence and witnesses who can support their case. It ensures that they have the means to challenge the prosecution's evidence effectively. Example: If a defendant believes that a particular witness can provide valuable testimony that supports their innocence, they have the right to compel that witness to appear and testify in court. 5. Right to an Impartial Jury. The Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to an impartial jury. The jury is expected to be fair, unbiased, and free from outside influence. Significance: An impartial jury is essential to the integrity of the trial process. It ensures that the case is decided based on the evidence presented in court rather than preconceived biases. Example: During jury selection, both the prosecution and defense have the opportunity to question potential jurors to identify any potential biases or prejudices that could affect their ability to be impartial. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Landmark Case: Beswick v Beswick (1968). Beswick v Beswick is an important case that illustrates the application of third-party rights and assignments. In this case, a nephew was promised certain benefits under a contract between his uncle and a company. When the uncle passed away, the company refused to honor the agreement. The court held that the nephew was an intended third-party beneficiary with the right to enforce the contract. Restrictions on Assignment and Delegation. While assignments and delegations are generally permissible, there are some restrictions and limitations that law students should be aware of: Prohibition in the Contract. The terms of the original contract may expressly prohibit assignment or delegation. When this prohibition is in place, assignments or delegations may be invalid. Material Change of Obligations. If an assignment or delegation results in a significant change in the obligor's obligations under the contract, it may be deemed invalid. Assignment of Personal Services Contracts. Assignments of personal services contracts, where performance relies heavily on the skills or abilities of a specific party, are often prohibited or subject to restrictions. Anti-Assignment Clauses. Some contracts may contain anti-assignment clauses that limit or prohibit the assignment of rights. However, these clauses are not always absolute, and their enforceability can vary. Specific Performance and Third-Party Beneficiaries. In some cases, a third-party beneficiary may seek specific performance of a contract. Law students should understand the circumstances under which this remedy is available and the challenges it may present: · Availability: Courts may grant specific performance to a third-party beneficiary if it is necessary to fulfill the promisor's contractual duties. However, the beneficiary must usually meet the same requirements as the original promisee. · Complexity and Discretion: Seeking specific performance as a third-party beneficiary can be complex and subject to the court's discretion. Courts will consider factors like feasibility, fairness, and the beneficiary's interests. Successive Assignments. Understanding the concept of successive assignments is crucial for law students. Successive assignments occur when rights under a contract are assigned more than once. Law students should grasp how successive assignments are treated in contract law, including: · Order of Priority: Generally, the first valid assignment takes precedence over later assignments. However, some jurisdictions follow the "first in time, first in right" principle, meaning the first assignee to give notice prevails. · Notifying the Obligor: It is essential for the assignee to notify the obligor for the assignment to be effective, and failure to provide notice can affect the assignee's priority. Conclusion. A thorough understanding of third-party rights, assignments, and the limitations and challenges that may arise is vital for law students. By recognizing the rights and responsibilities of third-party beneficiaries, the principles of valid assignments and delegations, and the nuances of successive assignments, students can provide valuable legal advice in complex contract-related disputes. This chapter has provided a comprehensive overview of third-party rights and assignments in contract law. As you continue your legal studies and practice, further exploration and application of these concepts will sharpen your ability to navigate intricate contract issues effectively. If you have any further questions or would like to continue with another chapter or topic, please let me know. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Authentication of Evidence. Defining Evidence Authentication and its Significance: Authentication of evidence is a fundamental concept in the field of evidence law. It involves the process of establishing the genuineness and reliability of evidence to ensure that it is what it purports to be. Authenticating evidence is of utmost importance as it safeguards the integrity of legal proceedings, promotes fairness, and helps prevent the introduction of false or misleading information. The significance of evidence authentication lies in its role as a gatekeeper for admissibility. Before evidence can be presented in court, it must meet the threshold of authenticity. In other words, parties wishing to introduce evidence must demonstrate that it is indeed what they claim it to be. This process not only ensures the reliability of the evidence but also safeguards the rights of the opposing party, ensuring they are not subjected to deceptive or inaccurate information. Recognizing that Evidence Must be Authenticated Before it can be Admitted in Court: Before evidence can be admitted in court, it must pass the authentication hurdle. The court will not consider evidence that has not been properly authenticated because there is a risk that unverified evidence may be fabricated, tampered with, or misleading. To maintain the integrity of legal proceedings, parties must establish the authenticity of the evidence they seek to introduce. This requirement applies to various types of evidence, including documents, photographs, digital evidence, physical objects, and more. The process of authentication can vary depending on the nature of the evidence and the circumstances of the case. Methods of Authentication Exploring Various Methods for Authenticating Different Types of Evidence: Document Authentication: Authenticating documents typically involves examining their contents, verifying signatures, seals, and handwriting, and establishing the document's chain of custody. Expert testimony may also be used to confirm the authenticity of handwriting or signatures. Photograph Authentication: When it comes to photographs, authentication may involve establishing who took the photograph, when it was taken, and whether it accurately represents the scene or subject in question. Witnesses who were present when the photograph was taken can provide valuable testimony. Digital Evidence Authentication: With the rise of digital evidence, authenticating electronic files, emails, or digital records is essential. This process often includes tracing the digital trail, verifying metadata, and ensuring the integrity of the data. Expert witnesses with knowledge of digital forensics may be called upon to authenticate such evidence. Physical Object Authentication: Authenticating physical objects, such as weapons, drugs, or pieces of clothing, requires establishing a chain of custody. This involves documenting the handling and storage of the item from the moment it was seized or collected to its presentation in court. The goal is to ensure that the physical evidence has not been tampered with or altered. Role of Witnesses: Witnesses who can provide firsthand knowledge or observations related to the evidence play a crucial role in authentication. They can confirm the origin, history, or characteristics of the evidence, adding credibility to its authenticity. Expert Testimony: Expert witnesses with specialized knowledge relevant to the evidence may be called upon to provide testimony. For example, a forensic expert might authenticate a piece of physical evidence based on their expertise in the field. Circumstantial Evidence: Sometimes, circumstantial evidence can help establish the authenticity of other evidence. For instance, security camera footage may be used to authenticate a photograph by showing the subject at the scene during the time in question. Chain of Custody. Defining the Chain of Custody and its Importance in Preserving the Integrity of Physical Evidence: --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Factors Influencing Sentencing Decisions. Sentencing decisions are complex and take into account various factors. While specific laws and sentencing guidelines vary by jurisdiction, here are some common factors that influence sentencing decisions: Nature and Severity of the Crime: The type of crime and its seriousness are primary considerations. More severe crimes often result in harsher penalties. Criminal History: A defendant's prior criminal record can significantly impact their sentence. Repeat offenders may face longer sentences. Victim Impact: The harm suffered by the victim, including physical, emotional, and financial consequences, is considered. Mitigating and Aggravating Factors: Certain factors can mitigate or aggravate a sentence. Mitigating factors might include remorse, cooperation with law enforcement, or a lack of prior criminal history. Aggravating factors could involve hate crimes, use of a weapon, or crimes committed while on parole. Statutory Guidelines: Many jurisdictions have statutory guidelines that judges must consider when determining sentences. These guidelines often provide a range of potential penalties based on the specific circumstances of the case. Sentencing Options Criminal penalties can take various forms, depending on the nature of the offense and the jurisdiction. Common sentencing options include: Fines: Monetary penalties that the defendant must pay as punishment for the crime. Probation: A period of supervision in the community instead of incarceration, often with conditions such as regular check-ins with a probation officer. Incarceration: Serving time in jail or prison, with the length of the sentence determined by the seriousness of the crime and other factors. Restitution: Requiring the defendant to compensate the victim for financial losses resulting from the crime. Community Service: Mandating the defendant to perform unpaid work for the community as a form of punishment. Now for a Case Study: State v Martinez - Sentencing Considerations To better understand sentencing considerations, let's examine State v Martinez. In this case, the defendant has been convicted of embezzlement, a white-collar crime. The judge must now determine an appropriate sentence. The judge will weigh factors such as the defendant's criminal history, the amount of money embezzled, any mitigating or aggravating circumstances, and the impact on the victim. All of these factors will help the judge arrive at a fair and just sentence that reflects the severity of the crime and the defendant's culpability. Now for question 1: Are there any sentencing principles that prioritize rehabilitation over punishment? Yes, rehabilitation is a fundamental principle of modern sentencing in many jurisdictions. The goal is to help offenders address the underlying issues that led to their criminal behavior and reintegrate them into society as law-abiding citizens. Sentencing options that prioritize rehabilitation may include probation with mandatory counseling or educational programs, drug treatment programs, or diversion programs for non-violent offenders. These approaches aim to reduce recidivism and promote the offender's rehabilitation. Now for question 2: Can sentences be appealed if the defendant believes the judge made an error in determining the penalty? Yes, sentences can be appealed in many jurisdictions if the defendant believes there was an error in determining the penalty. However, appeals typically focus on legal errors or violations of the defendant's rights rather than challenging the judge's discretion in weighing the sentencing factors. For example, an appeal might allege that the judge misapplied the law, imposed a sentence outside the statutory range, or failed to consider relevant factors. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Understanding Strict Liability. To kick things off, let's break down the concept of strict liability in Tort Law. Strict liability is a legal doctrine that holds individuals or entities responsible for the harm they cause, regardless of their intent or level of care. Unlike negligence, where fault or wrongdoing must be proven, strict liability focuses solely on the act itself and its consequences. Key Elements of Strict Liability. Strict liability cases typically involve the following key elements: 1. Inherently Dangerous Activities or Products: Strict liability often applies to activities or products that are inherently dangerous, meaning they carry a high risk of harm even when all precautions are taken. 2. Causation: The plaintiff must establish a direct link between the defendant's activity or product and the harm suffered. 3. Damages: To succeed in a strict liability claim, the plaintiff must demonstrate that they suffered actual harm or losses as a result of the defendant's actions or product. Examples of Strict Liability. Let's explore some real-world examples to illustrate the concept of strict liability: 1. Product Liability: One of the most common applications of strict liability is in product liability cases. If a defective product, such as a malfunctioning car airbag, causes harm to a consumer, the manufacturer may be held strictly liable for the injuries, regardless of whether they were negligent in the manufacturing process. 2. Ultrahazardous Activities: Activities deemed ultrahazardous, such as storing and transporting explosives or hazardous chemicals, often attract strict liability. If an explosion or chemical spill occurs, resulting in harm to others, those responsible may be held strictly liable for the damages. 3. Wild Animal Ownership: Owning wild animals as pets is considered an inherently dangerous activity. If a person's pet tiger escapes and injures someone, the owner can be held strictly liable for the injuries, even if they took precautions to prevent the escape. Analyzing Strict Liability Cases. Now, let's dig deeper into strict liability cases. These cases can be complex, and the outcomes can vary based on jurisdiction and specific circumstances. Let's consider a few illustrative examples: Example 1: Product Liability - Defective Toy. Imagine a scenario where a toy manufacturer produces a children's toy with small parts that pose a choking hazard. A child chokes on one of these small parts and suffers serious harm. In this case: - The toy manufacturer may be held strictly liable for the child's injuries because the product is defective and inherently dangerous to children. - The plaintiff does not need to prove that the manufacturer was negligent in producing the toy; the focus is on the dangerous nature of the product and the harm it caused. Example 2: Ultrahazardous Activity - Chemical Spill. Consider a situation where a chemical company is transporting hazardous chemicals, and due to an accident, a chemical spill occurs, contaminating a nearby river and causing harm to the environment and neighboring communities. In this case: - The chemical company may be held strictly liable for the environmental and personal injuries caused by the spill. - The inherently dangerous nature of transporting hazardous chemicals triggers strict liability. - The company may still be held liable even if it took reasonable precautions to prevent the spill, as strict liability focuses on the dangerousness of the activity itself. Example 3: Wild Animal Ownership - Escape of Exotic Pet. Imagine a person owns a pet lion, and despite secure enclosures, the lion escapes and injures a passerby. In this case: - The owner may be held strictly liable for the injuries caused by the escaped lion. - Owning a wild animal is considered an inherently dangerous activity, and the escape of such an animal can lead to strict liability. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Documentary Evidence Defined. Defining Documentary Evidence and its Importance in Legal Proceedings: Documentary evidence constitutes a foundational component of legal proceedings, serving as a pivotal source of information, facts, and records that can substantiate claims, establish the basis of a case, or refute allegations. The significance of documentary evidence lies in its ability to offer an objective, tangible record of events, transactions, and communication, thus providing a reliable basis for assessing the veracity of claims in legal disputes. Documentary evidence encompasses a diverse range of written, recorded, or visual materials. This can include contracts, emails, invoices, business records, photographs, letters, reports, and more. As a critical component of legal practice, these documents facilitate the establishment of facts, the presentation of arguments, and the pursuit of justice. Recognizing that Documentary Evidence Includes Written or Recorded Materials: Documentary evidence covers a wide spectrum of materials: Contracts: Agreements and legal obligations recorded in writing, specifying terms and conditions, which can be central to contractual disputes. Emails: Correspondence via email, often significant in cases involving communication and evidence of intentions or understandings. Records: Official records maintained by entities or organizations, such as financial records, medical records, and employment records. Photographs: Visual evidence in the form of pictures, images, or videos that can illustrate scenes, injuries, or events. Letters: Written correspondence that may provide insights into relationships, intentions, or events. Reports: Official reports generated by experts or professionals, including forensic reports, medical reports, and investigative reports. Understanding the nature, relevance, and authenticity of documentary evidence is essential in legal practice, as it plays a pivotal role in building and defending cases. Authenticating Documentary Evidence. The Process of Establishing the Authenticity of Documents Before Admission in Court: Authentication of documentary evidence is an indispensable step in ensuring that the documents introduced in legal proceedings are genuine, accurate, and untampered. The process of authentication involves demonstrating that the document is indeed what it purports to be and is, therefore, reliable and trustworthy. Methods for authenticating documentary evidence include: Verification of Signatures: Confirming the authenticity of signatures on documents by comparing them to known exemplars or utilizing expert witnesses with knowledge of handwriting analysis. Examination of Seals: Ensuring the validity of seals or notarizations on documents through the scrutiny of their legality and genuineness. Content Examination: Thoroughly reviewing the contents of the document to assess its internal consistency, coherence, and relevance to the case. Witness Testimony: Calling upon witnesses who can affirm the origin, purpose, and validity of the document in question. Chain of Custody: Establishing a continuous and unbroken chain of custody for the document, demonstrating that it has been securely handled and preserved. The authentication process is integral in maintaining the integrity of legal proceedings, preventing the submission of false or misleading information, and protecting the rights of the parties involved. Real Evidence Defined. Defining Real Evidence and its Role in Presenting Physical Objects as Evidence in Court: Real evidence, often referred to as physical evidence, is a category of evidence that includes tangible, concrete objects, items, or materials presented in court to substantiate a claim, provide proof, or illustrate a point. Real evidence holds a unique role in legal proceedings as it enables the presentation of actual objects or items related to a case, facilitating a more direct and tangible understanding of the facts in question. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

The Fifth Amendment: Protecting Individual Rights in the Criminal Justice System. The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution is a critical safeguard of individual rights in the criminal justice system. It encompasses several fundamental principles that protect individuals from government overreach and ensure fair treatment during legal proceedings. Let's dive into its key components: 1. Right to Remain Silent (Miranda Rights). One of the most well-known aspects of the Fifth Amendment is the right to remain silent, often associated with the Miranda warning. This warning, issued by law enforcement upon arrest, informs individuals of their right to remain silent and their right to an attorney. The warning stems from the landmark Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona (1966). Significance: The right to remain silent protects individuals from self-incrimination, ensuring that they cannot be forced to testify against themselves. It allows individuals to withhold potentially incriminating information during interrogations. Example: Imagine a suspect is arrested for a crime and brought in for questioning by the police. If the suspect chooses to exercise their right to remain silent, they can refrain from answering questions without adverse legal consequences. 2. Protection Against Double Jeopardy. The Fifth Amendment also includes the principle of protection against double jeopardy, which means that an individual cannot be tried twice for the same offense in the same jurisdiction after acquittal or conviction. This principle prevents the government from subjecting individuals to multiple prosecutions for the same conduct. Significance: Double jeopardy safeguards individuals from harassment by the government and prevents the prosecution from taking multiple shots at securing a conviction after an acquittal. Example: If a defendant is charged with a crime and found not guilty by a jury, the government cannot later charge the same individual with the same crime in the same jurisdiction, even if new evidence emerges. The Eighth Amendment: Prohibition of Cruel and Unusual Punishment. The Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution plays a crucial role in ensuring that punishments imposed by the criminal justice system are fair, proportionate, and humane. It prohibits cruel and unusual punishment and imposes limitations on the severity of sentences. Significance: The Eighth Amendment reflects society's moral standards by prohibiting excessive and inhumane punishments. It serves as a safeguard against the infliction of unnecessary suffering or torture on individuals in the criminal justice system. Example: If a court were to sentence an individual to a punishment that is considered excessively harsh or cruel, such as a punishment that involves physical torture, it would violate the Eighth Amendment. The Fourteenth Amendment: Incorporation of the Bill of Rights to the States and Equal Protection. The Fourteenth Amendment significantly expanded the protection of individual rights by incorporating the Bill of Rights, including the Fifth and Eighth Amendments, to apply to state governments. This process, known as incorporation, ensures that state governments are also bound by the same constitutional constraints that apply to the federal government. 1. Incorporation of the Bill of Rights. Significance: The incorporation of the Bill of Rights to the states ensures that individuals enjoy the same fundamental rights and protections, regardless of whether their legal encounters involve state or federal authorities. It ensures that state laws and actions must comply with the U.S. Constitution. Example: If a state law enforcement officer conducts a search without a warrant or probable cause, the Fourth Amendment's restrictions on unreasonable searches and seizures apply, and the evidence may be excluded in court. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

In contract law, a third-party beneficiary is an individual or entity who benefits from a contract between two other parties but is not one of the contracting parties themselves. Understanding the concept of third-party beneficiaries is essential for law students: Intended Beneficiary: An intended third-party beneficiary is someone for whom the contract was specifically created to benefit. They have the legal right to enforce the contract. Incidental Beneficiary: An incidental third-party beneficiary is someone who benefits from a contract indirectly but was not the intended recipient of the contract's benefits. Incidental beneficiaries do not have the right to enforce the contract. Rights of Intended Beneficiaries. Law students should grasp the rights and obligations of intended third-party beneficiaries: Enforcement Rights: Intended beneficiaries can typically enforce the contract and sue for specific performance or damages if the contracting parties fail to fulfill their obligations. Defenses: Contracting parties can raise defenses against intended beneficiaries if the beneficiary's claim is inconsistent with the parties' agreement. Landmark Case: Lawrence v Fox (1859). The case of Lawrence v Fox illustrates the principle of third-party beneficiaries. In this case, a contract was made for the sale of a horse between A and B, with the understanding that the horse would be delivered to C. C was deemed an intended beneficiary and could enforce the contract. This case demonstrates the legal recognition of third-party beneficiary rights. Privity of Contract. Understanding the concept of privity of contract is crucial for comprehending third-party beneficiary rights. Privity of contract traditionally held that only parties who were in a direct contractual relationship (i.e., the original parties) could enforce or be held liable under the contract. Third-party beneficiaries represented a departure from this doctrine, allowing certain non-parties to enforce contracts. Assignment of Contractual Rights and Delegation of Duties. Assignment of Contractual Rights. Assigning contractual rights involves transferring one's rights under a contract to another party, known as the assignee. Law students should grasp the following key aspects: Requirements for Valid Assignment: An assignment is generally valid if it is in writing, the assigning party (assignor) intends to make the assignment, and the other party (obligor) is notified. Rights of the Assignee: Once rights are assigned, the assignee can typically enforce those rights against the obligor. Revocability: Assignments are usually revocable unless they are accompanied by consideration or are irrevocable by their terms. Delegation of Duties. Delegating duties involves transferring one's obligations under a contract to another party, known as the delegatee. Students should understand the following: Requirements for Valid Delegation: A delegation is valid if it does not significantly change the obligor's duties and if it does not violate the terms of the contract. Liability of the Delegator: The delegator remains liable to the original obligee (party owed the duty) unless the contract expressly releases them from liability. Novation. Novation is a related concept that involves substituting a new party for one of the original parties to the contract, with the consent of all parties involved. The original contract is discharged, and the new party assumes the obligations. Law students should understand the implications and requirements of novation. Conclusion. A comprehensive understanding of third-party beneficiary rights and the assignment of contractual rights and delegation of duties is vital for law students. By recognizing when third-party beneficiaries have enforceable rights, understanding the principles of valid assignments and delegations, and grasping the concept of novation, students can provide valuable legal counsel in contract-related matters. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Attorney-Client Privilege. Defining Attorney-Client Privilege and its Significance: The attorney-client privilege is a legal doctrine that protects confidential communications between an attorney and their client from disclosure in court proceedings. This privilege is grounded in the fundamental principle that clients should be able to speak openly and honestly with their attorneys without fear that their communications will be used against them in court. The attorney-client privilege is a critical aspect of the legal system, as it promotes trust and transparency between clients and their legal counsel. Recognizing that Communications Between Attorneys and Clients are Generally Protected from Disclosure in Court: Under the attorney-client privilege, certain communications made in confidence between an attorney and their client are shielded from disclosure, even if those communications would otherwise be relevant and admissible as evidence in a legal case. This protection extends to both oral and written communications and includes discussions of legal advice, strategy, and information provided by the client to facilitate legal representation. The significance of this privilege cannot be overstated. It encourages clients to seek legal advice promptly and fully disclose all relevant information to their attorneys, allowing attorneys to provide the most effective counsel possible. Without this privilege, clients might be hesitant to share sensitive information with their lawyers, which could hinder the legal process and compromise their defense or legal claims. The attorney-client privilege, however, is not absolute and can be subject to limitations and exceptions. For instance, if a client communicates with an attorney with the intent to commit a crime or to perpetrate fraud, the privilege may not apply. Doctor-Patient Privilege. Understanding Doctor-Patient Privilege and its Scope: Doctor-patient privilege, also known as physician-patient privilege, is a legal doctrine that protects the confidentiality of communications between healthcare providers and their patients. This privilege is rooted in the principle that patients should feel free to discuss their medical conditions and history openly and honestly with healthcare professionals without fear that these conversations will be disclosed in legal proceedings. The scope of doctor-patient privilege typically covers a wide range of communications, including discussions of medical history, symptoms, diagnoses, treatment plans, and other medical information. This privilege exists to ensure that patients receive appropriate medical care and that healthcare providers can make accurate diagnoses and treatment recommendations based on complete and accurate information. Privacy Protections for Medical Communications Between Healthcare Providers and Patients: Doctor-patient privilege applies to both oral and written communications between patients and healthcare providers, including doctors, nurses, therapists, and other medical professionals. This protection extends to medical records, test results, and any information shared during medical examinations or consultations. Healthcare providers have a legal and ethical obligation to safeguard patient confidentiality. Violating this privilege can result in serious consequences, including legal liability and professional sanctions. It's important to note that the scope and application of doctor-patient privilege can vary by jurisdiction, and some jurisdictions may have specific laws or regulations that further define the privilege's boundaries. Spousal Privilege. Exploring Spousal Privilege and its Variations: Spousal privilege is a legal doctrine that protects certain communications between spouses from disclosure in legal proceedings. There are two primary variations of spousal privilege: --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

The Fourth Amendment: Protection Against Unreasonable Searches and Seizures. The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution safeguards individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. Key principles include: Warrants: Generally, the government must obtain a warrant based on probable cause to conduct a search or seizure. Warrants specify the place to be searched and the items or individuals to be seized. Probable Cause: To obtain a warrant or justify a search or seizure without one, law enforcement must have probable cause, which means a reasonable belief that a crime has been or is being committed. Exceptions: There are exceptions to the warrant requirement, such as searches incident to arrest, plain view doctrine, and consent searches. These exceptions are carved out based on the need for law enforcement to act swiftly or when individuals voluntarily consent to searches. The Exclusionary Rule: Deterrence of Unlawful Searches and Seizures. The exclusionary rule is a legal doctrine that prohibits the use of evidence in a criminal trial if it was obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment. Its primary purpose is to deter law enforcement from conducting unlawful searches and seizures. Key points include: Fruit of the Poisonous Tree: The exclusionary rule extends to evidence derived from the initial illegal search or seizure, known as the "fruit of the poisonous tree." If the primary evidence is tainted, so is any evidence subsequently discovered as a result of the illegal action. Good Faith Exception: Evidence may not be excluded if law enforcement acted in good faith based on a warrant they believed to be valid, even if it later turns out to be defective. Standing: To invoke the exclusionary rule, an individual typically must have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the place or item searched or seized. Case Study: United States v Johnson - Application of the Exclusionary Rule. To illustrate the application of the exclusionary rule, let's examine United States v Johnson. In this case, law enforcement conducted a search of the defendant's home without a warrant and discovered incriminating evidence. The defendant argues that the evidence should be excluded because the search violated the Fourth Amendment. Here, the court must determine whether the search was indeed unlawful and whether the evidence should be excluded as "fruit of the poisonous tree." The case underscores the importance of upholding Fourth Amendment protections and the consequences for law enforcement when those rights are violated. Now for question number 1: How do law enforcement officers determine what constitutes probable cause for a search or seizure? Probable cause is typically determined by evaluating the totality of the circumstances. Law enforcement officers must have enough facts and evidence to reasonably believe that a crime has been committed or is being committed. This determination often involves reviewing available information, witness statements, physical evidence, and any other relevant factors. It's a critical step in obtaining a search warrant or justifying a warrantless search or seizure. Now for question number 2: Can the exclusionary rule be applied in civil cases, or is it limited to criminal cases? The exclusionary rule is primarily applied in criminal cases to deter unlawful searches and seizures by law enforcement. Its purpose is to protect individuals' Fourth Amendment rights in the context of criminal prosecutions. However, there are situations where the exclusionary rule might have indirect implications in civil cases, such as when evidence obtained illegally in a criminal case leads to civil liability. Still, its direct application is in the criminal justice system. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Intentional torts are a fascinating and critical area of Tort Law. In this episode, we'll explore what intentional torts are, delve into various types of intentional torts, understand the essential elements required to prove an intentional tort claim, and explore defenses that defendants can use in such cases. Whether you're a law student, legal practitioner, or simply interested in the intricacies of the law, we're here to provide you with a comprehensive understanding of intentional torts. Understanding Intentional Torts. Intentional torts are a category of civil wrongs where the defendant intentionally engages in conduct that results in harm or injury to the plaintiff. Unlike negligence cases, where the focus is on the defendant's failure to exercise reasonable care, intentional torts center on the defendant's deliberate actions. Types of Intentional Torts. Let's begin by exploring some common types of intentional torts: Assault: Assault occurs when one person intentionally puts another in reasonable fear of an imminent harmful or offensive contact. Importantly, it's the fear of harm that constitutes assault, not the actual physical contact itself. For example, if someone raises their fist in a threatening manner towards another person, creating a reasonable fear of being punched, that could be considered assault. Battery: Battery is the intentional and harmful or offensive physical contact with another person without their consent. Unlike assault, battery requires actual physical contact. If someone punches another person without their consent, that would be a battery. False Imprisonment: False imprisonment occurs when someone intentionally restrains another person's freedom of movement without their consent and without legal justification. This can include actions like locking someone in a room against their will. Trespass to Land: Trespass to land is committed when someone intentionally enters another person's property without permission. This can include physical entry onto the property or causing an object to enter the property's airspace. Trespass to Chattels (Personal Property): This involves intentionally interfering with another person's lawful possession of personal property, causing harm or deprivation. For instance, if someone intentionally damages another person's car without permission, it could be a trespass to chattels. Conversion: Conversion is a more serious form of trespass to chattels. It occurs when someone intentionally interferes with another person's personal property to such an extent that it's akin to taking ownership of that property. If someone not only damages another person's car but also sells it without permission, it could be considered conversion. Elements of Intentional Tort Claims. To establish a successful intentional tort claim, certain elements must be proven: Intent: The defendant must have intentionally engaged in the conduct that caused the harm. Intent means that the defendant either desired the consequences of their actions or was substantially certain that those consequences would occur. Harm or Injury: There must be actual harm or injury suffered by the plaintiff as a result of the defendant's intentional actions. This harm can be physical, emotional, or financial, depending on the type of intentional tort. Causation: The plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant's intentional actions were the direct cause of the harm suffered. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

In this session, we will explore the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, a pivotal component of the Bill of Rights. The Fourth Amendment serves as a crucial safeguard against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. It outlines the conditions under which searches and seizures are considered lawful, emphasizing the importance of warrants and probable cause. Throughout this session, we will delve deep into the Fourth Amendment, dissecting its key provisions, examining landmark Supreme Court cases, and providing real-world examples to illustrate its practical implications. Introduction to the Fourth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution reads as follows: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."* At its core, the Fourth Amendment is designed to protect the privacy and security of individuals against overreach by the government. It establishes a fundamental principle: government officials, including law enforcement officers, cannot search or seize a person's property without a valid reason and proper authorization. Key Elements of the Fourth Amendment. Let's break down the essential elements of the Fourth Amendment: 1. The Right to Be Secure. The Fourth Amendment begins by recognizing the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects. This acknowledgment emphasizes that individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy in various aspects of their lives, including their bodies, homes, personal documents, and belongings. 2. Protection Against Unreasonable Searches and Seizures. The heart of the Fourth Amendment lies in its prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures. This means that government agents, such as law enforcement officers, cannot conduct searches or seizures unless they meet specific legal requirements. 3. Warrants and Probable Cause. The Fourth Amendment establishes a two-part test for the legality of searches and seizures: Warrants: Searches and seizures should generally be authorized by warrants issued by a neutral and detached magistrate. These warrants must meet specific requirements, including a description of the place to be searched and the items or individuals to be seized. Probable Cause: To obtain a warrant or justify a search or seizure without one, law enforcement officers must demonstrate probable cause. This means they must have reasonable grounds to believe that a crime has been committed or that evidence of a crime can be found in the location or on the person to be searched or seized. 4. Specificity. The Fourth Amendment also requires that warrants describe with particularity the place to be searched and the items or individuals to be seized. This ensures that government agents do not engage in general, exploratory searches. 5. Exceptions to the Warrant Requirement. While warrants based on probable cause are the preferred method for conducting searches and seizures, the Fourth Amendment recognizes that certain situations may necessitate exceptions to this rule. Some common exceptions include searches incident to arrest, consent searches, and exigent circumstances. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

In this chapter, we will explore the various remedies available to parties in cases of breach of contract. Remedies serve to compensate the non-breaching party for their losses and aim to restore them, as much as possible, to the position they would have been in had the contract been fully performed. Damages: Compensatory, Consequential, and Incidental. Compensatory Damages. Compensatory damages are the most common form of remedy for breach of contract. These damages aim to compensate the non-breaching party for their actual losses resulting from the breach. Key points include: Direct Losses: Compensatory damages cover direct losses, such as the cost of completing the contract with another party. Foreseeability: Damages must have been foreseeable at the time of contract formation to be recoverable. Consequential Damages (Special Damages). Consequential damages, often referred to as special damages, go beyond direct losses and include additional costs or losses that result indirectly from the breach. Law students should understand the principles of consequential damages: Foreseeability: Like compensatory damages, consequential damages must have been foreseeable at the time of contract formation. Causation: There must be a clear causal link between the breach and the consequential damages. Incidental Damages. Incidental damages are the additional costs incurred by the non-breaching party as a result of the breach. These damages are typically recoverable when they are reasonably incurred to mitigate losses. Specific Performance. Specific performance is an equitable remedy that may be available when monetary damages are inadequate to compensate for the breach. Law students should understand the key aspects of specific performance: Availability: Specific performance is typically available for contracts involving unique goods or services where monetary compensation would not adequately remedy the breach. Court Discretion: Courts have discretion in granting specific performance, considering factors like feasibility, fairness, and the unique nature of the contract. Restitution and Rescission. Restitution. Restitution is a remedy aimed at restoring the parties to their pre-contract positions. Law students should understand the principles of restitution: Return of Benefits: Restitution often requires the parties to return any benefits or consideration they received under the contract. Rescission. Rescission is the process of canceling or undoing a contract. It can occur by mutual agreement of the parties or by court order, typically due to factors like fraud, misrepresentation, or lack of capacity. Landmark Case: Lumley v Wagner (1852). The case of Lumley v Wagner is a notable example of specific performance. In this case, a singer contracted to perform exclusively at a particular venue. She later agreed to sing at a rival venue, breaching the exclusive contract. The court granted an injunction to prevent her from performing at the rival venue, enforcing specific performance of the contract. Conclusion. Understanding the remedies for breach of contract, including compensatory, consequential, and incidental damages, specific performance, and restitution and rescission, is essential for law students. By recognizing when each remedy is applicable and the principles governing their use, students can provide valuable legal counsel in contract-related disputes. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Today we will cover: Expert Witnesses Defined: Expert witnesses are individuals with specialized knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education in a particular field relevant to the legal case at hand. Their role in legal proceedings is to provide expert opinions and insights based on their expertise. They assist the trier of fact, such as a judge or jury, in understanding complex issues beyond the scope of common knowledge. Qualifying as an Expert: The process of establishing a witness as an expert involves several steps. Courts use different standards to admit expert testimony, with two prominent ones being the Daubert standard and the Frye standard: Daubert Standard: The Daubert standard, derived from the U.S. Supreme Court case Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals (1993), emphasizes the reliability and relevance of expert testimony. To qualify as an expert under this standard, the court considers factors such as whether the expert's methods and techniques have been tested, whether they have been peer-reviewed, and the known error rate of their methods. The judge serves as the gatekeeper, ensuring that the expert's testimony meets these criteria. Frye Standard: The Frye standard, originating from the case Frye v. United States (1923), focuses on whether the expert's methods and principles have gained general acceptance within the relevant scientific community. Under this standard, the expert's testimony is admissible if it is based on methods and principles that are generally accepted by experts in the field. Expert Opinion Admissibility: Admissibility of expert opinions depends on several factors, including relevance and the potential for prejudice. To be admissible, expert opinions must be pertinent to the issues in the case and helpful to the trier of fact. Courts carefully weigh the probative value of expert testimony against any potential prejudicial impact on the jury. Lay Opinion vs Expert Opinion: Distinguishing between lay opinions and expert opinions is crucial in the legal context: Lay Opinion: Lay witnesses provide testimony based on their personal experiences or common knowledge. They can testify about things they have personally observed or experienced. For example, a witness can testify that they saw a car run a red light. Expert Opinion: Expert witnesses, on the other hand, offer opinions based on their specialized knowledge and expertise in a particular field. They can provide insights, interpretations, and conclusions that go beyond what a layperson could provide. For instance, a forensic expert can offer an opinion on the cause of death based on scientific analysis. Now for a Case Study: Medical Malpractice Case: In a medical malpractice case, an expert witness, often a renowned surgeon or medical specialist, may be called to testify about the standard of care. To be admitted as an expert, this witness must demonstrate their qualifications, which typically include board certification in their medical specialty, extensive experience in similar cases, and a strong reputation within their field. Forensic Expert Testimony: In a murder trial, a forensic expert may be called to provide an opinion on the cause of death. The admissibility of the expert's opinion depends on factors such as their qualifications, the reliability of their analysis methods, and whether their conclusions are based on generally accepted principles in the field of forensic science. Now for some Questions: Expert Witnesses v Lay Witnesses: The primary difference between expert witnesses and lay witnesses lies in their basis for testimony. Expert witnesses provide opinions based on their specialized knowledge, while lay witnesses offer testimony based on personal experiences or common knowledge. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Welcome back, diligent legal scholars. In this session, we'll explore the fascinating and intricate world of white-collar crimes. These offenses typically involve deceit, financial misconduct, and violations of trust within the business and financial sectors. Today, we'll focus on three prominent white-collar crimes: fraud, embezzlement, and insider trading. Let's start with Fraud: Deceptive Practices for Financial Gain. Fraud is a broad category of white-collar crime that involves deliberate deception for financial or personal gain. Key elements of fraud include: A false statement, representation, or concealment of material information. Intent to deceive or defraud. Reliance on the false information by the victim. Damages or harm suffered by the victim as a result. Fraud can take many forms, such as securities fraud, mortgage fraud, identity theft, and healthcare fraud. Next, Embezzlement: Misappropriation of Funds. Embezzlement occurs when a person entrusted with someone else's money or property misappropriates it for their own use. Key elements of embezzlement include: A fiduciary relationship between the defendant and the victim. The defendant's misappropriation or conversion of the funds or property. The defendant's intent to permanently deprive the victim of their property. Embezzlement often occurs in employment or financial management settings. … Insider Trading: Trading on Nonpublic Information Insider trading involves buying or selling securities based on material, nonpublic information about a company. Key elements of insider trading include: The possession of material, nonpublic information. The defendant's use of that information to trade securities. The breach of a duty of trust or confidence, typically owed to the company and its shareholders. Insider trading is regulated by securities laws and can have significant legal and financial consequences. Here’s a Case Study: United States v Smith - Analyzing Securities Fraud To better understand these concepts, let's consider United States v Smith. In this case, the defendant, a corporate executive, is charged with securities fraud for making false statements about the company's financial health to inflate its stock price. Several investors suffered significant financial losses when the truth came to light. Here, we see the elements of securities fraud at play: false statements, intent to deceive, reliance by investors, and resulting harm. Securities fraud is a form of fraud that specifically pertains to the securities market. Now for our first question. Can you explain the difference between fraud and embezzlement in terms of the victim's relationship with the defendant? Certainly. The key difference between fraud and embezzlement lies in the nature of the victim's relationship with the defendant. Fraud: In fraud cases, the victim may have a more general or arm's-length relationship with the defendant. The defendant engages in deceptive practices to induce the victim to take certain actions, often involving financial loss. Embezzlement: In embezzlement cases, there is typically a fiduciary or trust relationship between the defendant and the victim. The defendant is entrusted with the victim's money or property due to a position of trust, such as an employee handling company funds. Embezzlement involves the defendant's breach of this trust by misappropriating the assets for their own use. Now our next question. How do insider trading laws apply to different types of securities transactions, such as buying or selling stocks, options, or bonds? Insider trading laws apply to a wide range of securities transactions, including buying or selling stocks, options, bonds, and other financial instruments. The key factor in determining whether insider trading has occurred is the use of material, nonpublic information for personal gain or to benefit others unfairly. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

To set the stage, imagine a situation where a driver runs a red light and collides with another vehicle, causing injuries to the occupants. Causation becomes a critical element in establishing that the driver's actions were the direct cause of the injuries sustained. One of the landmark cases that sheds light on the concept of causation is "Palsgraf v Long Island Railroad Co." In this case, a plaintiff was injured in a train station when a package containing fireworks was dropped by a railway employee. The court had to determine whether the railroad's actions were the proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries. To delve deeper into causation, let's explore two key aspects: "cause-in-fact" and "proximate cause." Cause-in-Fact: This aspect of causation, often referred to as "but-for causation," examines whether the plaintiff's injury would not have occurred "but for" the defendant's actions. In other words, it assesses whether the defendant's conduct was a necessary condition for the injury to happen. Proximate Cause: Proximate cause, also known as "legal cause," involves evaluating whether the defendant's actions were closely related to the resulting injury, foreseeably leading to it. It considers whether the consequences of the defendant's actions were within the scope of the risk they created. Now, for an interactive exercise, let's apply these concepts. Imagine a scenario where a construction worker fails to secure a heavy load properly, causing it to fall and injure a passerby. Discuss whether the construction worker's actions meet the criteria for both cause-in-fact and proximate cause. In the scenario where a construction worker fails to secure a heavy load properly, causing it to fall and injure a passerby, let's discuss whether the construction worker's actions meet the criteria for both cause-in-fact and proximate cause: Cause-in-Fact: To establish cause-in-fact, we need to determine whether the passerby's injury would not have occurred "but for" the construction worker's failure to secure the load properly. In this scenario, it is reasonably clear that the injury would not have happened if the construction worker had properly secured the heavy load. Therefore, the construction worker's actions meet the cause-in-fact criteria. Proximate Cause: Proximate cause, also known as legal cause, involves assessing whether the consequences of the construction worker's actions were closely related to the resulting injury and whether the injury was foreseeable. In this case, the injury (the passerby being injured by the falling load) appears to be a direct and foreseeable consequence of the construction worker's failure to secure the load properly. It is reasonably foreseeable that failing to secure a heavy load could lead to it falling and causing harm to nearby individuals. Therefore, the construction worker's actions also meet the criteria for proximate cause. In summary, the construction worker's actions in failing to secure the heavy load both satisfy the cause-in-fact and proximate cause criteria. Their failure to secure the load was a necessary condition for the injury to occur ("but for" causation), and the injury was a reasonably foreseeable consequence of their actions. These elements would likely support a claim of negligence against the construction worker in this scenario. Understanding causation is crucial in tort cases because it establishes the link between the defendant's actions and the plaintiff's injuries. Consider a situation where a manufacturer produces a contaminated food product that causes food poisoning in consumers. To establish causation, it must be shown that consuming the contaminated product directly resulted in the illness. The case of "Product Liability - Establishing Causation" highlights the challenges and complexities involved in proving causation in product liability cases, where multiple factors may contribute to an individual's illness or injury. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Part 3: The Third Amendment - Limits on Quartering Soldiers in Modern Times. Welcome to the third part of Session 3, where we continue our exploration of the Bill of Rights by examining the Third Amendment. While the Third Amendment may not be as frequently litigated as some others, it still holds relevance in modern times as it places limits on the quartering of soldiers in private homes. The Third Amendment Text. Let's begin by examining the text of the Third Amendment: Third Amendment Text: "No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law." Historical Context. To understand the Third Amendment's significance, it's essential to consider the historical context in which it was drafted. The amendment was a response to the Quartering Act of 1765 and the experiences of colonists during the American Revolution. The Quartering Act allowed British soldiers to be housed in colonists' private homes without their consent. This was deeply resented by the colonists and contributed to the broader grievances that led to the American Revolution. Protection of Privacy and Property. The Third Amendment is fundamentally about protecting the privacy and property rights of individuals from government intrusion. It establishes two important principles: Consent of the Owner: In times of peace, no soldier can be quartered in a private home without the consent of the homeowner. This places a strong emphasis on the sanctity of private property. Prescribed by Law in Wartime: In times of war, if the government deems it necessary to quarter soldiers in private homes, it must do so in a manner prescribed by law. This ensures that such intrusions are subject to legal and constitutional constraints. Modern Relevance. While the Third Amendment is not often the focus of contemporary legal disputes, it remains relevant in several ways: Protection of Privacy: The Third Amendment is an important part of the broader framework of constitutional protections for individual privacy. It underscores the principle that government intrusion into private homes should be limited and subject to legal safeguards. Limitation on Military Power: The amendment reflects a broader constitutional concern about the potential abuse of military power during times of peace and war. It reminds us of the importance of civilian control over the military. Historical Significance: The Third Amendment serves as a historical reminder of the grievances that contributed to the American Revolution and the foundational principles on which the United States was built. Limited Legal Cases. It's worth noting that there have been very few legal cases directly involving the Third Amendment. This is because, in practice, the government rarely seeks to quarter soldiers in private homes in modern times. However, the amendment still stands as a protection against such actions if they were to occur. Conclusion. In conclusion, the Third Amendment may not be the most frequently discussed or litigated amendment in the Bill of Rights, but it plays a significant role in upholding principles of privacy and property rights. It reminds us of the importance of protecting individual homes from unwarranted government intrusion. As we continue our exploration of the Bill of Rights in the upcoming sessions, we will examine each amendment and its relevance, both historically and in modern times. Thank you for joining me in this discussion. In our next session, we will turn our attention to the Fourth Amendment and its critical role in safeguarding against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. See you next time! --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Welcome back. Today we’ll cover Chapter 8: Remedies for Breach of Contract. Understanding the available remedies for breach of contract is crucial for law students to navigate contract disputes and provide effective legal counsel: a) Damages: Damages are the most common remedy for breach of contract. Law students should explore the different types of damages: - Compensatory Damages: These aim to put the non-breaching party in the position they would have been in if the contract had been fully performed. The goal is to compensate for actual losses or damages suffered as a result of the breach. - Consequential Damages (Special Damages): These are damages that result indirectly from the breach and were foreseeable at the time of contract formation. They go beyond direct losses and encompass additional costs or losses caused by the breach. - Nominal Damages: When a breach occurs, but no actual damages are proven, nominal damages may be awarded as a symbolic recognition of the breach. - Liquidated Damages: Some contracts include provisions specifying a predetermined amount of damages to be paid in case of a breach. These are enforceable if they are a reasonable estimate of the anticipated losses and not punitive. - Punitive Damages: Punitive damages are rarely awarded in contract cases. They are meant to punish the breaching party for willful, malicious, or fraudulent conduct. b) Specific Performance: In cases where monetary damages are inadequate to compensate the non-breaching party, specific performance may be ordered by the court. This remedy compels the breaching party to fulfill their contractual obligations as specified in the contract. c) Injunction: Injunctions are equitable remedies that prevent a party from taking a particular action. They can be used to prevent a breach of contract or to stop a party from engaging in actions that would harm the non-breaching party's interests. d) Restitution: Restitution is a remedy aimed at restoring the non-breaching party to the position they were in before the contract was entered into. It involves the return of any benefits or consideration provided. Mitigation of Damages. Law students should also understand the principle of mitigation of damages, which requires the non-breaching party to take reasonable steps to minimize their losses after a breach. Failure to mitigate can reduce the amount of damages recoverable. Equitable Defenses. Equitable defenses may be raised to prevent or limit the enforcement of remedies. Law students should be familiar with equitable doctrines such as: a) Unclean Hands: This defense asserts that the non-breaching party is also at fault or acted improperly, which can limit their ability to seek equitable remedies. b) Laches: Laches refers to unreasonable delay in asserting one's rights, which can bar the non-breaching party from obtaining equitable relief. Landmark Case: Peevyhouse v Garland Coal & Mining Company (1962). This case illustrates the principle that damages must be reasonable and proportionate to the breach. In this case, the coal company failed to restore land as promised after mining. The court held that the cost of restoration was disproportionate to the breach, and the damages awarded were limited to the diminution in property value. Conclusion. A comprehensive understanding of remedies for breach of contract, the principles of mitigation of damages, and equitable defenses is essential for law students. By recognizing the available remedies, the importance of mitigating damages, and the equitable principles that may impact a case, students can provide effective legal counsel in contract disputes. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Welcome back to our Evidence Law class! In this session, we will dive into one of the most critical and complex aspects of evidence law: the hearsay rule and its exceptions. Understanding when and how hearsay evidence can be admitted is essential for any aspiring lawyer. Let’s begin. 1. Hearsay Defined: - Defining hearsay and why it is generally inadmissible. - Recognizing that hearsay is an out-of-court statement offered for the truth of the matter asserted. 2. Hearsay Exceptions: - Exploring the common exceptions to the hearsay rule, including: - Present sense impression. - Excited utterance. - Declaration against interest. - Dying declaration. - Business records. - Prior inconsistent statements. 3. Rationale for Hearsay Exceptions: - Understanding the underlying reasons for allowing certain hearsay exceptions, such as reliability and necessity. 4. Limitations on Hearsay Exceptions: - Recognizing that not all statements falling within exceptions are automatically admissible. - Balancing probative value and potential prejudice. Examples and Case Studies: 1. Present Sense Impression Exception: In a personal injury case stemming from a car accident, a witness claims to have heard one of the drivers say, "I didn't see the red light." Explore whether this statement might fall under the present sense impression exception. 2. Business Records Exception: In a fraud trial, the prosecution wants to admit the defendant's bank records as evidence of financial misconduct. Discuss the admissibility of these records under the business records exception. Now Question 1: 1. Definition of Hearsay: Provide a concise definition of hearsay evidence. Here is the Model Answer: Hearsay is an out-of-court statement offered in court for the truth of the matter it asserts. Now for Question 2:. Purpose of Hearsay Exceptions: Why do courts recognize exceptions to the hearsay rule? Here is the Model Answer: Courts recognize exceptions to the hearsay rule when the statements within those exceptions are deemed sufficiently reliable or necessary for the purpose of fairness and justice in the legal process. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Greetings, eager legal minds. Today, we delve into the fascinating world of inchoate crimes. These offenses involve criminal actions that fall short of the completed crime but still merit legal consequences. We'll be focusing on three key inchoate crimes: solicitation, conspiracy, and attempt. Solicitation: Encouraging Criminal Conduct. Solicitation occurs when one person tries to persuade, entice, or induce another person to commit a crime. Key elements include: - The intent to have the other person commit a specific crime. - An overt act or communication that encourages or requests the commission of the crime. It's important to note that solicitation can be punished even if the solicited crime is never actually committed. Conspiracy: Agreement to Commit a Crime. Conspiracy involves an agreement between two or more individuals to commit a crime. Key elements include: - An agreement between two or more people. - An intent to commit a specific crime. - An overt act taken in furtherance of the conspiracy. Unlike solicitation, conspiracy requires an agreement, and the crime need not be completed for charges to be filed. It's the agreement itself that is considered criminal. Attempt: Taking Substantial Steps Toward a Crime. Attempt occurs when an individual takes substantial steps toward committing a crime but does not complete it. Key elements include: - An intent to commit a specific crime. - Taking substantial steps toward the commission of that crime. - Failing to complete the crime. Attempt charges hinge on the defendant's actions, such as buying materials for a bomb or breaking into a building with the intent to steal, even if the ultimate crime is not achieved. Case Study: State v Rodriguez - Analyzing Conspiracy Charges. To understand how these concepts apply in practice, let's consider State v Rodriguez. In this case, three individuals are charged with conspiracy to commit bank robbery. They were overheard discussing their plans to rob a local bank and were subsequently arrested before they could carry out the crime. Here, we see the elements of conspiracy at play: an agreement to commit a specific crime (bank robbery) and overt acts (discussing their plans). It's important to note that the crime itself does not need to be completed for conspiracy charges to be filed. This case study highlights how conspiracy charges can be brought even before the underlying crime occurs. Now for question 1: Can someone be charged with both solicitation and attempt for the same crime? It's possible for someone to be charged with both solicitation and attempt for the same crime if the circumstances warrant it. For example, if an individual solicits another person to commit a crime and then takes substantial steps toward committing that crime themselves, they could potentially be charged with both solicitation and attempt. However, the specific charges and their success in court would depend on the facts of the case and the laws of the jurisdiction. Now for question 2: What distinguishes an overt act in conspiracy from mere preparation? The distinction between an overt act in conspiracy and mere preparation can be nuanced. An overt act is a step that demonstrates a firm commitment to carrying out the criminal plan and moves beyond mere preparation. It's an action that shows the conspiracy is not merely a theoretical agreement but has progressed to a point where criminal activity is imminent. Mere preparation, on the other hand, involves preliminary actions that fall short of an unequivocal step toward committing the crime. For example, discussing plans, gathering information, or acquiring tools without taking any decisive action to further the criminal goal might be considered mere preparation. The determination of whether an act is an overt act or mere preparation can vary by jurisdiction and the specific facts of the case. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Welcome back to "Mastering the Bar Exam: Torts." In this episode, we'll dive into the world of damages in Tort Law, exploring the various types of damages that can be awarded in tort cases and the principles that guide their assessment. To set the stage, consider a scenario where a pedestrian is struck by a careless driver, leading to severe injuries. Understanding the concept of damages is crucial in determining the compensation that the injured party may be entitled to. One of the landmark cases that sheds light on the assessment of damages in Tort Law is "Parker v. South Eastern Railway Company." This case involved a plaintiff who was injured due to the defendant's negligence, leading to a legal battle over the extent of damages owed. To reinforce your understanding, let's engage in an interactive exercise. Imagine a situation where a person's reputation is severely damaged due to false statements made by a business competitor. Discuss the types of damages that may be sought in a defamation case. Model Answer: In a defamation case, the plaintiff may seek the following types of damages: 1. Compensatory Damages: These are intended to compensate the plaintiff for the actual harm suffered, such as damage to reputation, emotional distress, and financial losses. 2. Punitive Damages: In some cases, punitive damages may be awarded to punish the defendant for particularly egregious conduct and deter future misconduct. 3. Nominal Damages: When the plaintiff's reputation was harmed, but there are no measurable financial losses, nominal damages may be awarded to acknowledge the wrongdoing. 4. Special Damages: Special damages are awarded to compensate for specific, quantifiable financial losses, such as lost income or business opportunities. Damages are a fundamental aspect of Tort Law, serving as a means to compensate injured parties and promote accountability. Consider a scenario where a patient undergoes surgery, but due to the surgeon's negligence, experiences severe pain and incurs additional medical expenses for corrective procedures. Understanding the types of damages that can be claimed is essential for the patient's legal recourse. The case of "Medical Malpractice - Assessment of Damages" highlights how damages in tort cases can vary widely based on the nature and extent of harm caused by negligence. Let's expand on the idea that damages in tort cases, particularly in medical malpractice cases, can vary widely based on the nature and extent of harm caused by negligence. The Nature of Medical Malpractice Cases: Medical malpractice cases are a subset of tort law that deal with situations where healthcare professionals, such as doctors, nurses, or hospitals, are alleged to have provided substandard care to patients, resulting in harm or injury. The damages sought in these cases can be extensive due to the potential life-altering consequences of medical errors. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Welcome to the second part of Session 3, where we continue our exploration of the Bill of Rights, focusing on the Second Amendment. This amendment has been at the center of an ongoing and passionate debate over gun rights and gun control in the United States. The Second Amendment Text. Let's begin by examining the text of the Second Amendment: Second Amendment Text: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Historical Context. To understand the Second Amendment, it's essential to consider its historical context. The amendment was ratified in 1791, shortly after the United States gained independence from British rule. At that time, the Founding Fathers were deeply concerned about the potential for tyranny and the need to ensure the security of the new nation. Two Clauses - A Well-Regulated Militia and Individual Right. The Second Amendment consists of two clauses, and its interpretation has been a subject of significant debate: A Well-Regulated Militia: This clause suggests a connection between the right to bear arms and the necessity of a well-regulated militia for the security of the state. Some argue that this implies that the right to bear arms is linked to militia service. The Right of the People: This clause is often interpreted as recognizing an individual right to keep and bear arms, separate from militia service. This interpretation has been supported by Supreme Court decisions in recent years. Historical Debates. Over the years, the Second Amendment has generated considerable debate: Collective vs. Individual Right: One major debate centers on whether the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to own firearms for personal self-defense or whether it only guarantees the right to participate in a well-regulated militia. Original Intent vs. Contemporary Application: Another debate involves the original intent of the Founding Fathers versus the contemporary application of the Second Amendment in a vastly different societal and technological context. Landmark Cases. The Supreme Court has handed down several landmark decisions that have shaped the interpretation of the Second Amendment: District of Columbia v Heller (2008): In this case, the Court held that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess firearms for self-defense within the home. McDonald v Chicago (2010): This decision extended the individual right to bear arms recognized in Heller to the states, ensuring that state and local governments could not infringe on this right. Ongoing Debate. Despite these Supreme Court rulings, the debate over gun rights and gun control continues to be highly polarized in the United States. Advocates for gun rights argue that the Second Amendment protects an essential individual liberty, while proponents of gun control believe that stricter regulations are necessary to reduce gun violence. The debate encompasses issues such as background checks, waiting periods, bans on certain types of firearms, and regulations on gun sales. International Perspective. It's worth noting that the United States' approach to gun rights and gun control is distinct from many other developed nations. The U.S. has some of the most permissive gun laws among developed countries, which has contributed to both a high rate of gun ownership and gun-related incidents. Comparative analysis of gun policies and their outcomes can offer valuable insights into the ongoing debate. Conclusion. The Second Amendment, with its historical context and multifaceted clauses, remains a subject of vigorous debate in the United States. It illustrates the complexities of balancing individual rights and public safety in a democratic society. As we proceed through our exploration of the Bill of Rights, we will continue to examine each amendment, its historical context, and its role in contemporary legal and societal debates. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Types of Contract Performance. Understanding the various types of contract performance is essential for law students to grasp the complexities of contract law. Contracts can be performed in several ways: a) Complete Performance: This occurs when both parties fulfill their contractual obligations as specified in the contract. The contract is then discharged, and both parties are relieved of further obligations. b) Substantial Performance: In cases of substantial performance, one party has mostly fulfilled their obligations under the contract, but there may be minor, non-material deviations from the contract terms. The non-breaching party is generally entitled to the contract price minus any damages resulting from the deviations. c) Partial Performance: Partial performance involves one party performing only some of their contractual obligations. In such cases, the non-breaching party may be entitled to partial payment or specific performance of the remaining obligations. d) Inferior Performance: Inferior performance occurs when one party fails to meet the contract's standards or specifications. The non-breaching party can typically seek damages for any harm caused by the inferior performance. Material and Anticipatory Breach. Understanding the concepts of material breach and anticipatory breach is critical for law students: a) Material Breach: A material breach is a substantial failure to perform a significant aspect of the contract. When a material breach occurs, the non-breaching party is generally relieved of their contractual obligations and can seek damages for the harm caused by the breach. b) Anticipatory Breach. Anticipatory breach happens when one party indicates, through words or actions, that they do not intend to fulfill their contractual obligations before the performance is due. The non-breaching party can treat this as an immediate breach and seek remedies. Excuses for Non-Performance. Law students should be familiar with the various excuses for non-performance in contract law: a) Impossibility of Performance: If it becomes impossible to perform the contract due to unforeseen circumstances beyond the control of the parties (for example, natural disasters, death of a key party), the contract may be discharged. b) Impracticability: Impracticability arises when performance is still possible but becomes extremely burdensome or costly due to unforeseen circumstances. In such cases, the affected party may be excused from performance. c) Frustration of Purpose. Frustration of purpose occurs when an unforeseen event undermines the fundamental purpose of the contract, making it senseless to continue. This can lead to contract discharge. d) Mutual Rescission: Parties may mutually agree to cancel or rescind the contract, releasing both parties from their obligations. e) Accord and Satisfaction: Parties may reach a new agreement (accord) to substitute for the original contract, and once the new agreement is performed (satisfaction), the original contract is discharged. f) Novation: Novation involves substituting a new party for one of the original parties, with the consent of all parties involved. The original contract is discharged, and the new party assumes the obligations. Landmark Case: Jacob & Youngs, Inc v Kent (1921). This case illustrates the importance of substantial performance and the impact of minor deviations from contract specifications. In this case, a builder used the wrong brand of pipes, which was a minor deviation from the contract specifications. The court held that this did not constitute a material breach, and the builder was entitled to payment minus any damages caused by the deviation. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

No for today’s Topics: Character Evidence Defined: Defining character evidence and its relevance in legal proceedings. Distinguishing between character evidence related to conduct and character evidence related to reputation. Character Evidence in Criminal Cases: Character evidence in support of a defendant's good character. Prosecution's limited use of character evidence to rebut the defendant's claim. Character Evidence in Civil Cases: It's more restricted role in civil cases compared to criminal cases. The admissibility of character evidence to prove a person's propensity to act in a certain way. Exceptions and Special Circumstances: Exploring exceptions where character evidence may be admitted, such as in cases of sexual assault or child custody disputes. Balancing the probative value of character evidence against its prejudicial impact. Now for some Examples and Case Studies: Criminal Trial - Defendant's Good Character: In a criminal trial for assault, the defendant's attorney wants to introduce character evidence about the defendant's reputation for non-violence. Explore the admissibility and purpose of this evidence. Character Evidence in a Child Custody Case: In a child custody dispute, one parent wants to introduce evidence of the other parent's reputation for irresponsibility. Discuss the challenges and limitations of using character evidence in this context. Now for some Questions: Character Evidence in Criminal Cases: How can character evidence be used in a criminal case, especially when it relates to the defendant's character? In a criminal case, character evidence can be introduced by the defendant to show their good character or by the prosecution to rebut the defendant's claims about their character. Balancing Probative Value and Prejudice: Why is it important for the court to balance the probative value of character evidence against its potential prejudicial impact? Balancing probative value against prejudice ensures that the introduction of character evidence is fair and that it doesn't unduly influence the jury based on a person's reputation rather than the facts of the case. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

The Insanity Defense: M'Naghten, Irresistible Impulse, Durham. The insanity defense is a complex and controversial area of criminal law. It asserts that the defendant should not be held criminally responsible for their actions due to a mental illness or defect at the time of the offense. Let's explore some of the prominent insanity defenses: M'Naghten Rule: Under the M'Naghten rule, a defendant may be found not guilty by reason of insanity if they were unable to understand the nature and quality of their actions or if they did not know that their actions were wrong due to a mental disorder. Irresistible Impulse: This defense focuses on the defendant's inability to control their actions as a result of a mental disorder, even if they understood that their actions were wrong. It emphasizes the concept of volitional impairment. Durham Rule: The Durham rule, also known as the "product" test, states that a defendant is not criminally responsible if their unlawful act was the product of their mental illness. This rule provides a broader scope for the insanity defense. The application and acceptance of these defenses can vary widely by jurisdiction, and legal standards continue to evolve. Self-Defense and Defense of Others. Self-defense and defense of others are affirmative defenses that allow a person to use force, including deadly force, to protect themselves or someone else from imminent harm. These defenses are rooted in the principle of necessity and the right to protect one's life or the lives of others. Key elements include: Imminence: The threat must be immediate, and the use of force must be necessary to counteract the threat. Proportionality: The level of force used must be reasonable and proportionate to the threat. Deadly force is generally only justified when facing a threat of death or serious bodily harm. Reasonable Belief: The defender must have a reasonable belief that the use of force is necessary to protect against the threat. Case Study: State v Thompson - Analyzing Self-Defense Claim. To better understand these concepts, let's examine State v Thompson. In this case, the defendant is charged with assault after using force against an aggressor who threatened to harm them. The defendant claims self-defense. In this scenario, we must evaluate whether the defendant's actions meet the criteria for self-defense. Was the threat imminent? Was the level of force used reasonable and proportionate to the threat? Did the defendant genuinely believe their actions were necessary to protect themselves? This case study illustrates how self-defense claims are assessed in real-world legal scenarios. Now for our first question: Can the insanity defense result in the defendant's release, or is it more likely to lead to commitment to a mental institution? The outcome of an insanity defense can vary significantly based on the jurisdiction and the specific case. In some instances, a successful insanity defense may result in the defendant being committed to a mental institution for treatment and evaluation rather than being incarcerated in a traditional prison. The goal is to provide treatment and address the underlying mental health issues. However, the length of commitment and the specific conditions can vary, and some individuals may eventually be released if they are deemed no longer a danger to themselves or others. Now our second question: Can you use self-defense if you were the initial aggressor in a confrontation? Generally, the right to claim self-defense is limited if you were the initial aggressor in a confrontation. In many jurisdictions, if you start a physical altercation, you may lose the right to use force in self-defense unless you withdraw from the confrontation and communicate your intention to cease the aggression. The law typically encourages de-escalation and discourages individuals from provoking violence and then claiming self-defense. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

In this episode, we'll turn our attention to defenses in Tort Law, examining the strategies and arguments that can be used to counter tort claims. Picture a scenario where a property or homeowner owner is being sued for negligence after a guest tripped on a slightly uneven floorboard. The property owner might employ a defense to counter the claim, arguing that they took reasonable care to maintain the property. An illustrative case that exemplifies the use of defenses in Tort Law is "Assumption of Risk." In this case, a participant in an extreme sports event signed a waiver acknowledging the risks involved. The court had to determine if the participant assumed the risks associated with the activity, which could serve as a defense against a potential negligence claim. One notable case that highlights the importance of defenses in Tort Law is "Brown v. Smith." In this case, a defendant argued that the plaintiff's own negligence contributed significantly to the accident, presenting a comparative negligence defense. Let's engage in an interactive exercise to further understand these defenses. Consider a scenario where a doctor is being sued for medical malpractice after a surgery didn't go as planned. What defense might the doctor use, and how would it apply? Now let's look at the model answer. The doctor may use the defense of "Standard of Care." They would argue that they followed the established medical standards and procedures during the surgery, and the unfortunate outcome was a known risk associated with the procedure. To further enhance your understanding, let's engage in an interactive exercise. Consider a situation where a manufacturer is sued for a defective product, but they argue that the plaintiff misused the product, leading to the injury. Discuss the defense strategy and its elements. Now let's look at the model answer. The defense strategy involved in this scenario is "Product Misuse." The elements typically include demonstrating that the plaintiff used the product in a way that it was not intended or reasonably foreseeable, and this misuse was a substantial factor in causing the injury. Defenses in Tort Law play a crucial role in safeguarding individuals and entities from undue liability. Imagine a scenario where a homeowner is being sued for a slip and fall accident that occurred during a party they were hosting. The homeowner might invoke the defense of "Open and Obvious Danger," asserting that the hazard that caused the accident was clear and apparent, and the guest should have taken precautions. Let's imagine a situation where a property owner is sued for premises liability, but they claim that the injured party was trespassing at the time of the accident. Discuss the defense strategy and its elements. Now let's look at the model answer. The defense strategy in this scenario is "Trespasser Liability." The elements often include establishing that the injured party was indeed trespassing on the property, and the property owner did not owe the same duty of care as they would to a lawful visitor. Another noteworthy case involving the defense of "Good Samaritan Law" centers around a person who attempted to provide medical assistance at an accident scene. The court had to determine if the person was protected from liability under the law for their efforts to help. Now, for your final exercise in this episode, let's consider a scenario where a manufacturer is being sued for a product defect that led to injuries. What defense might the manufacturer use, and how would it apply? Now let's look at the model answer. The manufacturer may use the defense of "Product Misuse." They would argue that the product was used in a way that was not intended or recommended, which led to the injuries. This misuse could absolve the manufacturer of liability. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

The Bill of Rights - Protecting Individual Liberties. Instructor: The Bill of Rights consists of the first ten amendments to the U.S. Constitution. These amendments were added shortly after the Constitution's ratification to address concerns about the protection of individual liberties and to limit the powers of the federal government. The Importance of the Bill of Rights. Instructor: The Bill of Rights holds immense importance in our constitutional system for several reasons: 1. **Protecting Individual Rights:** The Bill of Rights guarantees fundamental rights and freedoms to every American citizen, ensuring that government power does not infringe upon individual liberties. 2. **Limiting Government Power:** It serves as a check on government authority, particularly that of the federal government, by delineating specific areas where it cannot encroach upon individual rights. 3. **Balancing Interests:** The Bill of Rights represents a delicate balance between individual rights and the needs of society. It recognizes that certain rights, such as freedom of speech, religion, and assembly, are fundamental to a thriving democracy. 4. **Legal Framework:** The amendments in the Bill of Rights provide a legal framework for protecting citizens' rights in cases of potential government overreach. They have been instrumental in numerous landmark Supreme Court decisions. The First Amendment - Freedom of Expression. Let's start our exploration of the Bill of Rights by examining the First Amendment, one of the most cherished and frequently litigated amendments. **First Amendment Text:** "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." Freedom of Religion. The First Amendment protects two aspects of religious freedom: 1. **The Establishment Clause:** This clause prohibits the government from establishing an official religion or favoring one religion over others. It ensures the separation of church and state. 2. **The Free Exercise Clause:** This clause guarantees the right to practice one's religion freely without government interference, as long as these practices do not violate other laws or harm public interests. Freedom of Speech and the Press. Instructor: The First Amendment also safeguards freedom of speech and the press: 1. **Freedom of Speech:** This right allows individuals to express their thoughts, opinions, and ideas without censorship or government restraint, with some limitations such as incitement to violence or obscenity. 2. **Freedom of the Press:** The press is granted the right to report news and information without government interference, serving as a vital check on government actions and a source of information for the public. The Right to Assemble and Petition. Instructor: The First Amendment further protects the right to assemble peaceably and petition the government for a redress of grievances: 1. **Right to Assemble:** Citizens have the right to gather and express their views through protests, demonstrations, and other forms of assembly, as long as they do so peacefully. 2. **Right to Petition:** Individuals and groups can petition the government to address their concerns or grievances. This includes the right to send letters, file lawsuits, or engage in other forms of advocacy. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Chapter 6: Writing and Formality Requirements. Statute of Frauds. The Statute of Frauds is a legal principle that requires certain types of contracts to be in writing to be enforceable. Law students should explore the Statute of Frauds and its various requirements: a) Covered Contracts: The Statute of Frauds typically applies to contracts for the sale of real property, contracts that cannot be performed within one year, contracts for the sale of goods over a certain value, and promises to answer for the debt of another. b) Writing Requirements: Contracts subject to the Statute of Frauds must be in writing or evidenced by a written memorandum that includes essential terms and is signed by the party to be charged. c) Exceptions: Certain contracts, such as those fully performed, admissions in court, and part performance of oral real estate contracts, may be exceptions to the Statute of Frauds. Exceptions to the Statute of Frauds. Law students should be aware of situations where contracts can be enforceable despite the Statute of Frauds: a) Partial Performance: In some jurisdictions, part performance of an oral contract for the sale of real property can remove the contract from the Statute of Frauds if it demonstrates a clear and substantial commitment to the contract. b) Admission: An admission by a party in court or in writing acknowledging the existence of an oral contract can remove the contract from the Statute of Frauds. c) Promissory Estoppel: In certain cases, the doctrine of promissory estoppel can make an oral contract enforceable if one party reasonably relied on the promise to their detriment. Parol Evidence Rule. The parol evidence rule limits the admissibility of extrinsic evidence to modify, contradict, or add to the terms of a fully integrated written contract. Law students should explore this rule and its implications: a) Integration: Contracts are either fully integrated (intended to be the complete and final expression of the parties' agreement) or partially integrated (allowing for supplementary terms). b) Exceptions: The parol evidence rule does not apply to evidence related to fraud, illegality, duress, mistake, or conditions precedent. Landmark Case: Masterson v. Sine (1968). The case of Masterson v. Sine provides insight into the parol evidence rule. In this case, the court held that the parol evidence rule did not prevent the introduction of extrinsic evidence when the contract was partially integrated and the evidence related to a condition precedent. Conclusion. Understanding the Statute of Frauds and the parol evidence rule is crucial for law students to interpret and enforce contracts effectively. By recognizing the types of contracts subject to the Statute of Frauds, the exceptions to its requirements, and the limitations imposed by the parol evidence rule, students can navigate the complexities of contract formation and interpretation with confidence. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Welcome back to our Evidence Law class! In this session, we'll delve into the intricacies of witnesses and their testimony. Witnesses play a vital role in presenting evidence and helping establish the truth in legal proceedings. By the end of this session, you'll have a comprehensive understanding of witness credibility, examination, and cross-examination. Topics Covered: Witness Credibility: Factors affecting witness credibility: demeanor, consistency, bias, and personal interest. Assessing the credibility of lay witnesses and expert witnesses. Direct Examination: Purpose and techniques of direct examination. Open-ended questions to elicit a comprehensive narrative from witnesses. Cross-Examination: Role and significance of cross-examination in challenging witness testimony. Effective strategies for cross-examination, including leading questions and impeachment. Refreshing Recollection: Use of documents or past statements to refresh a witness's memory while testifying. Limitations and safeguards to prevent coaching. Examples and Case Studies: Witness Credibility in a Fraud Case: Imagine a fraud case involving a Ponzi scheme. Witness credibility comes into focus: Witness bias: A former business partner testifying against the defendant might have a personal interest in blaming the defendant for financial losses. Direct and Cross-Examination in a Theft Trial: Consider a theft trial where a store owner accuses an employee of stealing. Let's examine the questioning strategies: Direct examination: The store owner asks open-ended questions about the employee's duties and behavior. Cross-examination: The defense attorney challenges the store owner's testimony by asking pointed questions about security measures and potential misidentifications. Now for some Questions: Witness Credibility Factors: Name three factors that can impact the credibility of a witness. And the Answer is: Three factors that can affect witness credibility are demeanor on the stand, consistency in their statements, and any potential bias or personal interest in the case. Purpose of Cross-Examination: What is the primary purpose of cross-examination during a trial? And the Answer is: The primary purpose of cross-examination is to challenge the witness's testimony, credibility, and version of events presented during direct examination. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Rape and Sexual Assault: Definitions and Elements. Sexual offenses encompass a range of acts, but two primary categories are rape and sexual assault: Rape: Rape is defined as the non-consensual sexual intercourse with another person. Key elements include lack of consent and the act of sexual penetration. Laws regarding rape vary by jurisdiction, so it's essential to be aware of your local definitions and requirements. Sexual Assault: Sexual assault is a broader term that can encompass a range of non-consensual sexual acts, not limited to intercourse. It may include acts such as sexual touching, groping, or other forms of sexual contact without consent. In both cases, the central element is the absence of consent. Consent must be freely given, informed, and unequivocal. Any form of coercion, force, or incapacity to consent can negate the presence of consent. Consent and Force in Sexual Offenses. Understanding the concept of consent is paramount in sexual offense cases. Consent should be enthusiastic and voluntary. The absence of consent can result from various factors, including coercion, intoxication, incapacity, or fear. It's essential for legal professionals to carefully consider the circumstances surrounding each case to determine whether consent was present. Force is another crucial aspect. In some cases, force may be explicit, while in others, it can be implied or inferred. The degree of force required varies by jurisdiction and the specific charge. Statutory Rape and Age of Consent Laws. Statutory rape laws address sexual acts involving minors who are unable to legally provide consent due to their age. These laws aim to protect minors from sexual exploitation and abuse. The age of consent varies by jurisdiction, so it's essential to know the specific laws in your area. Case Study: Commonwealth v. Anderson - Applying Consent Laws. To better understand the application of consent laws, let's examine *Commonwealth v. Anderson*. In this case, the defendant is accused of sexual assault against an individual who was intoxicated at the time. The defendant argues that the victim initially seemed willing but later withdrew consent due to intoxication. Here, we must analyze the concept of consent. Consent must be continuous and can be withdrawn at any point. If the victim withdrew consent due to intoxication, it's essential to assess whether they were capable of giving informed and voluntary consent at any stage of the encounter. The case hinges on the evaluation of the victim's state of mind and capacity to provide consent. This case study underscores the importance of careful consideration of consent in sexual offense cases. Now for some questions. Question 1: What is the role of affirmative consent laws in sexual offense cases? The answer: Affirmative consent laws require clear and affirmative agreement from all parties involved in a sexual encounter. These laws emphasize the importance of ongoing communication and mutual agreement throughout the encounter. They shift the burden of proof from the victim having to show non-consent to the defendant having to demonstrate affirmative consent. The goal is to create a standard that ensures all sexual interactions are consensual and respectful. Question 2: Can you explain the difference between rape and sexual assault charges in terms of legal penalties? The answer: Penalties for rape and sexual assault charges vary by jurisdiction and the specific circumstances of each case. Generally, rape is often considered a more severe offense and may carry more substantial penalties, including longer prison sentences. Sexual assault charges can have varying degrees, each with its own associated penalties. Factors such as the presence of force, the age of the victim, and the specific acts involved all play a role in determining the charges and potential penalties. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Welcome back to Mastering the Bar Exam: Torts. In this episode, we'll continue our journey through Tort Law by exploring strict liability—an area that emphasizes accountability regardless of fault. Imagine a scenario where a manufacturing company releases a product that, despite all precautions, ends up causing harm to consumers. Strict liability becomes relevant when certain activities or products are inherently dangerous, and the responsible party is held liable for any resulting harm, regardless of fault. One of the landmark cases that shaped the concept of strict liability is "Rylands v. Fletcher." In this case, a defendant's reservoir burst, flooding a neighboring property. The court established the principle of strict liability for activities that involve the non-natural use of land and can cause harm. To reinforce your understanding, let's engage in an interactive exercise. Imagine a scenario where a fireworks manufacturer experiences an accidental explosion, causing extensive damage to nearby homes. Identify the legal concept involved and discuss its elements. Now the answer: The legal concept involved in this scenario is "Strict Liability." Strict liability applies when a defendant is held responsible for harm caused by their activities or products, regardless of fault. The elements usually include the inherently dangerous activity or product, causation, and damages. Strict liability underscores the idea that certain activities or products are so inherently risky that those who engage in them must bear the responsibility for any harm they cause. Consider a situation where a person owns a wild animal as a pet, and it escapes, causing injuries to others. Strict liability principles can be applied when individuals engage in activities that are inherently dangerous, such as keeping wild animals as pets. The case of "Ultrahazardous Activity" involving a company that used explosives in a residential area without taking adequate precautions is a classic example of strict liability. The court held the company strictly liable for the harm caused by their inherently hazardous activity. Now, for your final exercise in this episode, let's imagine a scenario where a construction company uses dynamite near a residential neighborhood, resulting in damage to nearby homes. Discuss the applicability of strict liability and its elements. Now the answer: Strict liability is applicable in this scenario due to the inherently dangerous activity involving explosives near a residential area. The elements typically encompass the inherently dangerous activity, causation, and damages. You've made great progress in your exploration of Tort Law by delving into strict liability, an area that emphasizes accountability for inherently dangerous activities and products. In our next episode, we'll turn our attention to defenses in Tort Law, examining the strategies and arguments that can be used to counter tort claims. Keep up the excellent work, and remember, you're on the path to mastering the Bar Exam! --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Session 6 - Preamble and Articles of the Constitution. Part 6: Federalism - The Division of Powers Between Federal and State Governments. Welcome back to the sixth part of our session on the Preamble and Articles of the U.S. Constitution. In the previous segments, we examined the significance of the Preamble, scrutinized each Article of the Constitution, discussed the Amendments, and explored the principles of judicial review. Today, we will delve into another core principle of our constitutional system: federalism and the intricate balance of powers between the federal government and the states. Introduction to Federalism. Federalism is a fundamental aspect of the U.S. Constitution that shapes the distribution of powers and responsibilities between the federal government and individual state governments. This system was designed to strike a delicate balance, preventing either level of government from becoming too dominant. Federal Powers - Enumerated and Implied. The Constitution grants certain powers explicitly to the federal government. These are known as enumerated powers and are primarily found in Article I, Section 8. Some key federal powers include: Regulating commerce among the states and with foreign nations. Levying and collecting taxes. Coining money and establishing a national currency. Providing for the common defense and general welfare. Declaring war and maintaining the armed forces. These enumerated powers are the foundation of federal authority. In addition to these explicit powers, the federal government also possesses implied powers necessary to carry out its functions. These were affirmed in the landmark case of McCulloch v. Maryland. State Powers - Reserved and Concurrent. The Tenth Amendment to the Constitution reserves powers not delegated to the federal government to the states or the people. These reserved powers encompass a wide range of functions, including: Regulating intrastate commerce. Conducting elections. Establishing and maintaining schools. Enforcing criminal laws. Managing public health and safety. States also exercise concurrent powers, which are shared with the federal government. This means that both levels of government can act in areas such as taxation, law enforcement, and environmental regulation. The Supremacy Clause. The Supremacy Clause, found in Article VI, Section 2 of the Constitution, establishes that the federal Constitution, federal laws, and treaties are the supreme law of the land. This clause clarifies the hierarchy of laws in cases of conflict between federal and state laws. When state laws clash with federal laws or the Constitution itself, federal law prevails, and state laws are invalidated. This principle ensures that the federal government's authority is maintained when there is a need for uniformity in areas of national concern. The Role of the States. States play a crucial role in our federal system. They serve as laboratories of democracy, experimenting with different policies and approaches to address local needs. States also have the power to amend their own constitutions and pass laws in areas not explicitly reserved to the federal government. States are responsible for a wide range of policy areas, including education, healthcare, transportation, criminal justice, and environmental regulation. The diversity of state laws and regulations reflects the unique priorities and values of each state's citizens. Federalism as a Check on Government Power. Federalism serves as a check on government power, preventing any single entity from accumulating too much authority. It promotes competition and innovation in governance, as states can pursue their own policies to address specific challenges. The dual sovereignty of federalism also safeguards individual rights. If one level of government infringes on rights, individuals may find protection at the other level. This balance of power ensures that government remains responsive to the needs and preferences of its citizens. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Chapter 5: Mutual Assent and Defenses to Contract Formation. Meeting of the Minds. The principle of mutual assent is at the core of contract formation, emphasizing that both parties must have a clear understanding and agreement on the terms of the contract. Law students should explore the concept of a "meeting of the minds": a) Objective Theory of Contracts: Courts use an objective standard to determine whether a meeting of the minds has occurred, focusing on the parties' outward expressions and actions rather than their subjective intentions. b) Offer and Acceptance: Mutual assent requires the offer and acceptance to correspond in terms and be communicated effectively. c) Silence as Acceptance: Generally, silence does not constitute acceptance, but there are exceptions based on prior dealings or industry practices. Mistake, Misrepresentation, and Fraud. Law students should delve into situations where mutual assent might be lacking due to mistake, misrepresentation, or fraud: a) Mutual Mistake: When both parties are mistaken about a material fact, the contract may be voidable if the mistake goes to the core of the agreement. b) Unilateral Mistake: If only one party is mistaken, the contract is typically enforceable unless the other party knew or should have known about the mistake. c) Misrepresentation: A false statement of material fact can lead to a contract being voidable by the innocent party. d) Fraud: Intentional misrepresentation of material fact with the intent to deceive can render a contract voidable by the innocent party. Duress and Undue Influence. Understanding the defenses of duress and undue influence is crucial for law students to recognize situations where a party's free will might be compromised: a) Duress: Contracts entered into under duress (coercion or threat) are voidable by the coerced party. b) Undue Influence: Contracts resulting from undue influence, where one party takes unfair advantage of the other's vulnerability, may be voidable by the influenced party. Landmark Case: Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Co. (1965) The case of Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Co. highlights the importance of mutual assent and the defense of unconscionability. In this case, the court held that a contract was unenforceable due to unconscionability, as one party took advantage of the other's lack of bargaining power and understanding of the contract terms. Conclusion. Understanding mutual assent and the defenses to contract formation is vital for law students to navigate the complexities of contract law. By recognizing situations where parties might lack a true meeting of the minds, where misrepresentation or fraud might occur, and where defenses like duress and undue influence may apply, students can better analyze and evaluate the validity of contracts and related disputes. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Welcome back to our Evidence Law class! In this session, we will explore the crucial concepts of relevance and admissibility in depth. These principles are essential for determining which evidence can be presented in court. By the end of this session, you will have a solid understanding of how these criteria shape the admissibility of evidence. Today Topics to be Covered: 1. Relevance of Evidence: - Defining relevance: Evidence must have a logical connection to the facts at issue in the case. - Standard for determining relevance: Whether the evidence makes the existence of a fact more or less probable. 2. Exclusion of Irrelevant Evidence: - Ensuring efficiency and focus in legal proceedings by excluding evidence that is not pertinent to the case. - Balancing probative value against potential for confusion or waste of time. 3. Admissibility Criteria: - Hearsay rule: Understanding the general prohibition on secondhand statements, with exceptions. - Character evidence: Exploring limitations on using a person's character to infer their behavior. - Opinion evidence: Differentiating between lay opinions and expert opinions. 4. Balancing Test: - Weighing probative value against potential prejudicial impact to determine admissibility. Here are some Examples and Case Studies: 1. Relevance in a Murder Trial: Imagine a murder trial where the defendant claims self-defense. Relevance becomes a key consideration: - Relevant evidence: The victim's prior violent behavior to establish the reasonableness of the defendant's fear. - Irrelevant evidence: The defendant's favorite color, which has no bearing on the case. 2. Hearsay Exception in a Contract Dispute: Consider a contract dispute where a party seeks to admit a statement made by a deceased contract partner: - Exception to the hearsay rule: The statement may be admissible if it falls under the "Dying Declaration" exception. Now for some Questions: 1. Relevance vs. Admissibility: Differentiate between relevance and admissibility in the context of evidence. Answer: Relevance pertains to whether evidence logically connects to the facts at issue, while admissibility concerns whether evidence meets specific legal criteria to be presented in court. 2. Hearsay Exception: Question. Can you provide an example of a situation where the hearsay rule might not apply? Answer: One such exception is the "Excited Utterance" exception, where a statement made under the influence of a startling event may be admissible as an exception to the hearsay rule. Join me next week for Session 3. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Greetings, future legal practitioners. In our quest to master the intricacies of criminal law, we now turn our attention to theft crimes. Theft is a widespread offense that involves taking someone else's property without their consent. It's a multifaceted area of law, encompassing various forms of wrongful taking. Let's delve into the details. Types of Theft: Larceny, Embezzlement, False Pretenses, Robbery. Theft crimes can take several forms, each with distinct legal elements: Larceny: Larceny is the unlawful taking and carrying away of another person's property with the intent to permanently deprive them of it. Key elements include the intent to steal and the physical taking of property. Embezzlement: Embezzlement involves the fraudulent conversion of property that has been entrusted to the defendant. The defendant misappropriates the property for their own use. False Pretenses: False pretenses occur when the defendant obtains someone else's property by knowingly making a false statement of fact with the intent to defraud. This typically involves inducing the victim to part with their property based on the false statement. Robbery: Robbery is the unlawful taking of another person's property by force, threat, or intimidation. Unlike other theft crimes, robbery involves taking property directly from the victim's person or presence. Elements and Differences Between Theft Crimes. Understanding the specific elements that define each theft crime is crucial. While they all involve wrongful taking, the key distinctions lie in the defendant's intent, the manner of taking, and the relationship between the parties involved. For instance, larceny requires a physical taking with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of their property. Embezzlement, on the other hand, involves a breach of trust and misappropriation of entrusted property. False pretenses focus on the deceitful inducement that leads to the transfer of property. Robbery combines theft with force or fear. Case Study: State v. Parker - Evaluating Robbery Charges. To illustrate these concepts, let's examine State v. Parker. In this case, the defendant is accused of forcefully snatching a woman's purse on a busy street. The defendant argues that they only intended to scare the woman and didn't actually intend to take her purse. Here, we can analyze the situation as a potential robbery. The defendant's use of force to take the woman's purse indicates the elements of robbery. It's not necessary for the defendant to have the intent to keep the purse permanently; the act of forceful taking for any period, even momentarily, constitutes robbery. This case study demonstrates how legal definitions and elements are applied to real-world situations, impacting the charges brought against a defendant. Now let's answer some questions. Question 1: Can consent be a defense in theft crimes? Yes, consent can be a valid defense in theft crimes. If the owner willingly and knowingly gives permission for someone to take their property, it negates the element of wrongful taking required for theft offenses. For instance, if someone borrows an item with the owner's permission and later returns it, there's no theft because the owner consented to the temporary taking. Question 2: What's the difference between theft and burglary? Great question. While both theft and burglary involve taking property, burglary is distinct. Burglary is the unlawful entry into a building or structure with the intent to commit a crime inside, often theft. It involves an element of breaking and entering, which is not a requirement for theft. Burglary addresses the intrusion itself, while theft focuses on the taking of property. And that concludes our exploration of theft crimes. We've covered various types of theft, the elements that define them, and even examined a case study to apply these principles. Keep engaging with the material and cultivating your legal acumen. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

In this episode, we'll shift our focus to intentional torts—an intriguing area that examines the consequences of deliberate Imagine a situation where someone intentionally punches another person, causing physical harm. Intentional torts come into play when a person's deliberate actions lead to harm or injury to another individual. One of the most well-known intentional tort cases is "Battery." In this case, a defendant had intentionally touched the plaintiff in an offensive and harmful manner, without their consent. The court had to determine if the defendant's actions constituted a battery. Let's engage in another interactive exercise to reinforce your understanding. Consider a scenario where a person spreads false and damaging rumors about a coworker, causing harm to their reputation. Identify the intentional tort involved and discuss its elements. Here is the Model Answer: The intentional tort involved in this scenario is "Defamation." Defamation occurs when a false statement is communicated to a third party, damaging a person's reputation. The elements of defamation typically include a false statement, publication to a third party, harm to the reputation, and negligence or fault on the part of the speaker. Intentional torts highlight the significance of accountability for deliberate harmful actions, even if they don't involve physical violence. Consider a scenario where a person intentionally interferes with a business contract between two parties, causing financial harm. The concept of intentional interference with contractual relations applies when a person intentionally disrupts contractual relationships for their own gain. "Trespass to Land" is another intentional tort that exemplifies the concept. In a notable case, a person entered another's property without permission, leading to a lawsuit over the violation of property rights. Time for an exercise! Suppose a photographer uses someone's likeness without their consent to advertise a product, leading to financial losses for the individual. Identify the intentional tort involved and discuss its elements. Here is the Model Answer: The intentional tort involved in this scenario is "Right of Publicity." Right of publicity tort occurs when a person's name, image, or likeness is used for commercial purposes without their consent, causing financial harm. The elements generally include the unauthorized use, a commercial purpose, harm suffered, and lack of consent. As we explore intentional torts, you'll gain insights into the various ways intentional actions can lead to legal consequences. Imagine a situation where a person intentionally locks someone in a room against their will. The concept of false imprisonment comes into play when a person intentionally restricts another person's freedom of movement without lawful justification. The case of "False Imprisonment" involving a store's security personnel detaining a shopper on suspicion of theft without proper evidence highlights the legal considerations surrounding this intentional tort. For your final exercise, consider a scenario where someone intentionally invades another person's privacy by secretly recording their private conversations. Identify the intentional tort involved and discuss its elements. Here is the Model Answer: The intentional tort involved in this scenario is "Invasion of Privacy." Invasion of privacy occurs when a person intrudes upon another person's private affairs, violating their reasonable expectation of privacy. The elements typically encompass the intrusion, the private nature of the information, a reasonable expectation of privacy, and harm suffered. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Session 5 - Preamble and Articles of the Constitution. Part 5: The Concept of Separation of Powers and the Relationship Among the Three Branches. Welcome back to the fifth part of our session on the Preamble and Articles of the U.S. Constitution. In the preceding segments, we explored the significance of the Preamble, analyzed each Article of the Constitution, discussed the Amendments, and delved into the principles of judicial review. Today, we will shift our attention to a core principle of our constitutional system: the separation of powers and the intricate relationship among the three branches of government. Introduction to Separation of Powers. The principle of separation of powers lies at the heart of the U.S. Constitution. It divides the powers and functions of government among three distinct branches: the Legislative Branch, the Executive Branch, and the Judicial Branch. Legislative Branch - Lawmaking and Representation. The Legislative Branch, established by Article I of the Constitution, holds the primary responsibility for making laws. It consists of the Senate and the House of Representatives. Function of the Legislative Branch: The Legislature enacts, amends, and repeals laws that govern the nation. It also holds the power of the purse, controlling government spending and taxation. Role in Checks and Balances: The Legislative Branch checks the Executive Branch's power through oversight, impeachment, and the ability to override vetoes. It also confirms judicial appointments. Executive Branch - Enforcement and Leadership. The Executive Branch, established by Article II of the Constitution, is responsible for enforcing laws and executing the functions of government. Function of the Executive Branch: The President, as the head of the Executive Branch, is the Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces, negotiates treaties, appoints federal officers, and oversees federal agencies. Role in Checks and Balances: The Executive Branch can veto legislation passed by Congress, ensuring that the President has a role in the lawmaking process. The President also has the authority to nominate federal judges. Judicial Branch - Interpretation and Adjudication. The Judicial Branch, established by Article III of the Constitution, interprets and applies the law through the federal courts. Function of the Judicial Branch: Federal courts, including the Supreme Court, decide legal disputes, interpret the Constitution and laws, and ensure that laws are consistent with the Constitution. Role in Checks and Balances: The Judicial Branch exercises judicial review, determining the constitutionality of laws and government actions. This power serves as a check on the Legislative and Executive Branches. Checks and Balances Among the Branches. The separation of powers is complemented by a system of checks and balances that prevents any one branch from becoming too powerful. Legislative Checks: Congress can override vetoes, confirm or reject appointments and treaties, and impeach and remove federal officers, including the President. Executive Checks: The President can veto legislation, appoint federal judges and officials, and grant pardons. Judicial Checks: The Judiciary exercises judicial review, striking down laws that violate the Constitution. Courts can also interpret laws passed by Congress. Intricate Relationship Among the Branches. The separation of powers fosters an intricate relationship among the three branches, promoting cooperation and preventing tyranny. Legislative and Executive Interaction: The President must sign bills into law, veto them, or allow them to become law without a signature. This interaction reflects the collaborative nature of the lawmaking process. Executive and Judicial Interaction: The President appoints federal judges, subject to Senate confirmation, while the courts can rule on the constitutionality of executive actions. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Capacity of Parties to Contract. Capacity refers to the legal ability of parties to enter into a contract. Law students should delve into the various factors that affect a party's capacity to contract: a) Minors: Minors (individuals under the age of majority) generally lack the capacity to enter into contracts. Contracts with minors are voidable at the minor's option, although certain contracts, such as those for necessities, may be binding. b) Intoxicated or Mentally Incapacitated Individuals: Contracts entered into by individuals who are intoxicated or suffering from mental incapacity may be voidable if the party lacked the capacity to understand the terms and consequences of the contract. c) Corporations and Other Entities: Capacity of entities to contract is determined by their legal status and governing documents. Ultra vires acts (actions beyond the entity's legal powers) may be unenforceable. Minors and Incapacity. When it comes to contracts involving minors, law students should explore the complexities of such agreements: a) Disaffirmance: Minors can disaffirm (void) a contract at any time before reaching the age of majority or for a reasonable time thereafter. b) Exceptions: Contracts for necessaries (essential goods and services) are generally binding on minors. However, minors are only liable for the reasonable value of the goods or services received. Contracts Contrary to Public Policy. Law students should be aware of contracts that are against public policy and therefore unenforceable: a) Illegal Contracts: Contracts that involve illegal activities or violations of law are void and unenforceable. b) Unconscionable Contracts: Contracts that are extremely one-sided and unfairly advantageous to one party may be deemed unconscionable and unenforceable. c) Restraint of Trade: Contracts that unreasonably restrain trade or competition are often unenforceable due to their potential to harm the public interest. Landmark Case: Lucy v. Zehmer (1954). The case of Lucy v. Zehmer illustrates the principle of mutual assent and the capacity to contract. In this case, the parties were inebriated at the time they purportedly entered into a contract to sell a farm. One party later claimed the contract was a joke, but the court held that the evidence indicated the parties had the requisite mutual assent and capacity to form a valid contract. Conclusion. Understanding the capacity of parties to enter into contracts and the limitations based on age, mental capacity, and legality is crucial for law students. By recognizing the rules surrounding minors' contracts, the effects of intoxication or mental incapacity, and the concept of contracts contrary to public policy, students can identify situations where a party's lack of capacity or the illegality of a contract may affect its enforceability. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Welcome to our Evidence Law class! In this session, we'll provide a comprehensive introduction to evidence law and its significance within the legal system. By the end of this session, you'll have a solid grasp of how evidence functions in legal proceedings. Topics to be Covered: Understanding Evidence Law: Definition of evidence and its pivotal role in legal contexts. Distinguishing between substantive law, which defines rights and obligations, and procedural law, which outlines legal processes. The Objectives of Evidence Law: Establishing factual information and truth during a case. Safeguarding fairness and due process in legal proceedings. Enhancing the reliability of judicial decisions by basing them on credible information. Categories of Evidence: Real evidence: Tangible items presented in court, such as weapons, documents, or photographs. Documentary evidence: Written or recorded materials, like contracts, emails, and records. Testimonial evidence: Statements given by witnesses under oath. Relevance and Admissibility: Significance of relevance: Evidence must be pertinent to the issues in the case to be admissible. Key barriers to admissibility: Hearsay, character evidence, and more. Here are some Examples and Case Studies: Criminal Trial Example: Imagine a criminal trial where the defendant is charged with theft. In this scenario, distinct types of evidence come into play: Real evidence: Security camera footage showing the defendant taking the item. Documentary evidence: A signed confession by the defendant admitting to the theft. Testimonial evidence: An eyewitness's statement detailing how they saw the defendant commit the crime. Car Accident Dispute Scenario: Let's consider a car accident case. Here, we'll explore the implications of admissibility on testimonial evidence: If witness statements were obtained through leading questions, their admissibility might be challenged due to potential bias or coaching. And now for today's Questions: Primary Purpose of Evidence: What is the primary purpose of introducing evidence in a legal proceeding? Model Answer: The primary purpose of presenting evidence is to establish factual truth within a case, ensuring fairness in the legal process and aiding judges and juries in making informed decisions. Example of Testimonial Evidence: Could you provide an example of testimonial evidence that might be presented in a civil lawsuit? Model Answer: In a civil lawsuit involving a breach of contract, testimonial evidence could be a witness's statement recounting a conversation they had with one of the parties, which sheds light on the terms of the contract and the intent of the parties involved. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Class Session 3: Assault and Battery. Greetings, legal scholars. Today, we're delving into another fundamental aspect of criminal law: assault and battery. These terms are often used interchangeably, but they represent distinct offenses with their own legal elements. Let's explore further. Defining Assault and Battery. Assault and battery are two separate offenses, each involving different actions and legal requirements. Assault: Assault refers to the intentional act that causes another person to reasonably fear an imminent harmful or offensive contact. It's important to note that no physical contact is required for an assault to occur. The focus here is on the victim's apprehension of impending harm. Battery: Battery, on the other hand, involves the intentional harmful or offensive physical contact with another person. Unlike assault, battery requires actual physical contact between the defendant and the victim. Distinction Between Assault and Battery. To clarify, let's use a practical example. Imagine someone raises a fist and threatens to punch another person. If no physical contact occurs, it could be considered assault, as the victim feared an imminent harmful act. However, if the person follows through and strikes the victim, it becomes battery due to the actual physical contact. Assault with Intent vs. Simple Assault. Within the realm of assault, there can be variations based on the defendant's intent. Simple Assault: This occurs when a person intentionally puts another in fear of immediate harm or offensive contact. The intent is to create apprehension, not necessarily to cause physical harm. Assault with Intent: This involves an elevated level of intent, where the defendant not only intends to create apprehension but also intends to commit another specific crime. For example, if someone threatens another with a weapon and intends to rob them, it could be charged as assault with intent to commit robbery. Here's a Case Study: People v. Ramirez - Analyzing Assault Charges. Now, let's apply these concepts to a case study: People v. Ramirez. In this case, the defendant is accused of threatening a store clerk with a knife during a robbery attempt. The defendant claims they never intended to actually harm the clerk, only to scare them into giving up the money. Here, we can analyze the defendant's actions as both assault and assault with intent. The threat of harm using the knife created apprehension in the store clerk's mind, potentially leading to a simple assault charge. However, because the defendant had the specific intent to commit another crime (robbery), the charge could be elevated to assault with intent. This case study highlights the importance of assessing the defendant's intent and the victim's perception of the situation when determining the appropriate charges. Now for todays’ questions. Question 1: How does self-defense come into play in assault and battery cases? Self-defense can be a valid defense in assault and battery cases. When a person reasonably believes they are in imminent danger of physical harm, they may use reasonable force to defend themselves. The force used must be proportional to the threat. If a person's actions meet the criteria for self-defense, they may not be held criminally liable for assault or battery. Question  2: Can assault or battery be charged without any intent on the part of the defendant? Yes, it's possible. Some jurisdictions have statutes that allow for charges of negligent or reckless assault or battery. In such cases, the defendant's actions, even without intent, are considered so careless or reckless that they create a substantial risk of harm to others. These charges don't require the same level of intent as intentional assault or battery, but they still hold the defendant accountable for their actions. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Welcome back to "Mastering the Bar Exam." In this episode, we'll delve into negligence—a key area of Tort Law that explores the concept of reasonable care and liability for failure to exercise it. Here’s an example. Consider a scenario where a driver fails to yield the right of way at an intersection and causes a collision. Negligence comes into play when the driver's failure to exercise reasonable care leads to harm. A classic case that illustrates the principles of negligence is "Brown v. Kendall." In this case, two men were fighting, and one of them swung a stick to separate the dogs that were also involved in the altercation. The stick accidentally hit the other man's eye, causing injury. The court had to determine whether the defendant's actions were negligent. Let's engage in an interactive exercise to solidify these concepts further. Imagine a scenario where a restaurant owner fails to clean up a spill on the floor, leading to a customer slipping and falling. Identify the elements of negligence in this situation. Now the answer: - Duty of Care: The restaurant owner owes a duty to customers to provide a safe environment free from hazards. - Breach: Failing to clean up the spill and allowing a hazardous condition breaches the duty of care. - Causation: The failure to clean the spill directly causes the customer to slip and fall. - Damages: The customer sustains injuries and potential financial losses due to the fall. Negligence is a critical concept in Tort Law as it forms the basis for assessing liability when someone's actions or omissions lead to harm. Imagine a doctor failing to order necessary tests for a patient with worrisome symptoms, resulting in a delayed diagnosis. The concept of negligence applies when the doctor's failure to exercise reasonable care results in harm to the patient. The case of "Blyth v. Birmingham Waterworks Co." is an iconic example of negligence. In this case, a water company had frozen pipes that led to flooding. The court had to determine whether the water company's actions constituted negligence, considering whether their precautions aligned with reasonable care. Here's another exercise for you. Suppose a property owner neglects to repair a broken railing on a staircase, leading to a visitor's fall and injuries. Discuss how the elements of negligence apply in this scenario. Now the answer: - Duty of Care: The property owner owes a duty to visitors to provide a safe environment, including properly maintained railings. - Breach: Failing to repair the broken railing breaches the duty of care. - Causation: The broken railing directly causes the visitor's fall and injuries. - Damages: The fall results in injuries and potential financial losses for the visitor. As we dive deeper into negligence, we'll explore its elements, principles, and real-life cases that have shaped its application in Tort Law. Understanding negligence is crucial not only for the Bar Exam but also for your future legal practice. Congratulations on expanding your knowledge of Tort Law and delving into the world of negligence. In our next episode, we'll shift our focus to intentional torts—an intriguing area that examines the consequences of deliberate harmful actions. Until then, keep honing your legal skills, and remember, you're on the path to mastering the Bar Exam. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Welcome back to the fourth part of our session on the Preamble and Articles of the U.S. Constitution. In the previous segments, we explored the significance of the Preamble, examined each Article of the Constitution, and delved into the Amendments, particularly the Bill of Rights and other crucial additions. Today, we will shift our focus to the principles of judicial review and the pivotal role that the judiciary plays in interpreting and applying the Constitution. Introduction to Judicial Review. Instructor: One of the foundational principles of our constitutional system is judicial review, which empowers the judiciary to review and, if necessary, invalidate laws and government actions that are inconsistent with the Constitution. This principle emerged from the landmark case of Marbury v. Madison. Marbury v. Madison - The Power of Judicial Review. In 1803, the U.S. Supreme Court, under Chief Justice John Marshall, decided the case of Marbury v. Madison. This case is pivotal in legal history because it established the principle of judicial review. Marbury v. Madison centered on a political dispute over the appointment of judges during the final days of President John Adams's administration. The Court ruled that while William Marbury, one of the appointees, had a right to his commission, the Supreme Court did not have the authority to enforce it. Chief Justice Marshall's opinion, however, went further, asserting the Court's power to review acts of Congress and determine their constitutionality. The Judiciary's Role in Interpreting the Constitution. Let's delve into the role of the judiciary in interpreting and applying the Constitution: Interpreting the Constitution: The judiciary serves as the final arbiter in interpreting the Constitution. When disputes arise over the Constitution's meaning or the constitutionality of laws, it falls to the courts to provide an authoritative interpretation. Applying Constitutional Standards: The judiciary employs various standards of review to assess the constitutionality of laws. These standards include strict scrutiny, intermediate scrutiny, and rational basis review, depending on the nature of the right at stake. Balancing Rights and Government Interests: Courts must strike a balance between protecting individual rights and upholding legitimate government interests. This often involves intricate legal reasoning and consideration of the impact of decisions on society. The Doctrine of Stare Decisis. Another important principle in judicial interpretation is the doctrine of stare decisis, which means "to stand by things decided." This doctrine encourages courts to adhere to precedent - decisions made in previous cases - to ensure consistency, predictability, and stability in the law. Stare decisis allows for the gradual evolution of legal principles over time, as new cases build upon existing precedents. However, it also gives courts the flexibility to overrule past decisions if they are no longer viable or if societal values have changed significantly. Judicial Review and Constitutional Checks and Balances. Instructor: The principle of judicial review plays a crucial role in maintaining the checks and balances among the three branches of government. While the legislative and executive branches enact and implement laws, the judiciary ensures that those laws comply with the Constitution. Through the exercise of judicial review, the judiciary can strike down laws that violate constitutional principles, protecting individual rights and preventing the concentration of power in one branch. This power also reinforces the Constitution's role as the supreme law of the land, guiding the actions of all branches of government. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

3.1 Definition and Importance of Consideration. Consideration is a fundamental concept in contract law that involves the exchange of something of value between the parties as a prerequisite for a valid contract. Law students should delve into the characteristics and importance of consideration: a) Bargained-for Exchange: Consideration requires a mutual exchange where each party gives something of value in return for the promise or performance of the other party. b) Legal Sufficiency: The consideration exchanged must have legal value, which can include money, goods, services, a promise to perform, or a promise to refrain from doing something. c) Adequacy of Consideration: Courts generally do not inquire into the adequacy of consideration, meaning that the value exchanged does not need to be equivalent. However, grossly inadequate consideration or instances of fraud could be relevant. 3.2 Exceptions: Promissory Estoppel. Promissory estoppel is a doctrine that allows a promise to be enforced even if there is no valid consideration. Law students should understand the elements of promissory estoppel and its application: a) Clear and Definite Promise: The promise made by one party must be clear, definite, and reasonably relied upon by the other party. b) Reliance: The promisee must have reasonably relied on the promise to their detriment. c) Injustice: Enforcing the promise is necessary to prevent injustice or unconscionable behavior. 3.3 Landmark Case: Ricketts v. Scothorn (1898). The case of Ricketts v. Scothorn provides an illustration of the principle of promissory estoppel. In this case, a grandfather promised his granddaughter a sum of money. The granddaughter relied on this promise to her detriment by quitting her job and making arrangements based on the expected funds. When the grandfather later refused to fulfill his promise, the court held that promissory estoppel applied, and the granddaughter was entitled to the promised sum due to her reasonable reliance. 3.4 Conclusion. A solid grasp of consideration and its role in contract law is essential for law students. By understanding the concept of bargained-for exchange, legal sufficiency, and the exceptions such as promissory estoppel, students can navigate the complexities of contract formation and identify situations where valid consideration may not be present, yet a promise can still be enforced. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Legal separation (sometimes judicial separation, separate maintenance, divorce a mensa et thoro, or divorce from bed-and-board) is a legal process by which a married couple may formalize a de facto separation while remaining legally married. A legal separation is granted in the form of a court order. In cases where children are involved, a court order of legal separation often makes child custody arrangements, specifying sole custody or shared parenting, as well as child support. Some couples obtain a legal separation as an alternative to a divorce, based on moral or religious objections to divorce. Legal separation does not automatically lead to divorce. The couple might reconcile, in which case they do not have to do anything in order to continue their marriage. A mensa et thoro separation. A mensa et thoro is a legal Latin phrase which means "from table and bed", often translated as "from bed and board", in which "board" is a word for "table". Separation a mensa et thoro is essentially a separation that is sanctioned by a court order, meaning that the spouses may legally live apart, but they are still legally married. The legitimacy of any future child born to the couple remains intact, and the spouses may not legally remarry. This type of separation allows the couple to live apart without concerns about being taken to court for "desertion". (In some jurisdictions, provable "desertion" is legal grounds for a divorce.) There are several reasons why a couple might seek a mensa et thoro separation. In some legal jurisdictions, including certain countries, it can be difficult to get a full and final divorce, but if the spouses are already separated a mensa et thoro for an extended period of time (for example, three years), the court may decide to grant a full and final divorce. When the requirements of burden of proof for a divorce are difficult to meet, in most jurisdictions, an a mensa et thoro ruling assures the couple a slot in the court's schedule whenever they file for a full divorce, by showing that they were both serious about their separation. Sometimes, an a mensa et thoro separation is used when one partner is claimed to be emotionally, verbally, or physically abusive, keeping the marriage in existence while the two spouses are physically separated. This physical separation may give the two of them a chance to work out the problems in their relationship while residing in legally sanctioned separate dwellings. Spouses may also request an a mensa et thoro separation to protect themselves from accusations of desertion or abandonment—such as in cases where one must depart from the other for an extended period of time. United States. In the United States of America, a legal separation may address the division of assets, division of debts, child custody, child support, and alimony. A separate maintenance agreement is not a legal separation and therefore child support and custody are typically not allowed to be addressed. A separate maintenance agreement is often confused with a legal separation which is filed with a court. Separate maintenance agreements are contracts between spouses and not approved by a court. They are similar to prenuptial agreements. Under the law of some states, a separation can occur by judicial decree, or by an acknowledged ("notarized") agreement of the parties. In some states, there must be grounds or a cause of action to get a judicial decree of separation, such as "cruel and inhuman treatment ... abandonment ... neglect or refusal support ... adultery by the defendant, confinement of the defendant in prison ...." Reconciliation is allowed. So, therefore, separation is revocable; state laws may require "the joint application of the parties, accompanied with satisfactory evidence of their reconciliation ... by the court which rendered it, subject to such regulations and restrictions as the court thinks fit to impose." --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Welcome back, eager learners. Today, we delve into a particularly weighty topic: homicide. This is a critical area of criminal law that requires a keen understanding of the different degrees of murder and manslaughter. So, let's begin. Overview of Homicide as a Crime. Homicide is the killing of one person by another person. It's a broad category that encompasses various degrees and forms, each carrying distinct legal implications and potential penalties. Homicide cases can be complex and emotionally charged, making it crucial for legal professionals to grasp the nuances. Murder: Degrees and Elements. Murder is the unlawful killing of another person with malice aforethought. Malice aforethought doesn't necessarily mean premeditation; it refers to the intent to kill or inflict serious bodily harm. Murder charges can be categorized into different degrees based on the presence of specific elements. First-Degree Murder: This is the most serious form of murder. It typically involves premeditation, deliberation, and intent to kill. First-degree murder often requires planning and an element of cruelty. It's important to note that some jurisdictions also classify certain types of murders, such as those committed during the commission of another felony (felony murder), as first-degree murder. Second-Degree Murder: This form of murder lacks the premeditation and deliberation required for first-degree murder. However, it still involves an intentional killing, albeit without the same level of planning. Second-degree murder might also encompass killings that occur in the heat of passion. Voluntary Manslaughter: Voluntary manslaughter occurs when a person intentionally kills another, but the act is committed in the heat of passion, often triggered by sudden provocation. The killing isn't premeditated or planned, but it results from an emotional response. Involuntary Manslaughter: Involuntary manslaughter involves unintentionally causing the death of another person due to reckless conduct or criminal negligence. Unlike murder or voluntary manslaughter, there is no intent to kill, but the person's actions show a disregard for human life. It's essential to consider these different degrees when analyzing a homicide case to determine the appropriate charges and potential defenses. A Case Study: State v. Johnson - Applying Degrees of Murder. To better illustrate these concepts, let's delve into a fictional case study: State v. Johnson. In this case, the defendant is accused of killing someone during a bar fight. The defendant claims it was self-defense, while the prosecution argues it was an intentional act. Here, we see elements of both second-degree murder and voluntary manslaughter. The lack of premeditation could lead to a second-degree murder charge. However, the defendant's claim of self-defense raises questions about whether the killing occurred in the heat of passion, potentially leading to a charge of voluntary manslaughter. This case study underscores the importance of analyzing the circumstances, evidence, and intent behind the killing to determine the appropriate degree of murder or manslaughter. It's also a reminder of how critical legal defenses can impact the final verdict. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Welcome back to "Mastering the Bar Exam." In this episode, we're going to continue our exploration of Tort Law, specifically focusing on the introduction to Tort Law, its purpose in the legal system, and the fundamental elements of a tort claim. To begin, let's consider a scenario that highlights the importance of Tort Law. Imagine a scenario where a customer slips and falls in a grocery store due to a wet floor, leading to injuries. In such situations, Tort Law comes into play to determine whether the store had a duty to maintain a safe environment and whether they breached that duty, causing harm. An illustrative case that underscores the role of Tort Law is the famous "Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co." This case revolved around a woman who was injured due to an explosion caused by a package mishandled by the railroad company. The court had to analyze whether the company's actions could have reasonably foreseen the harm and whether their breach of duty led to the injuries. Now, let's engage in an interactive exercise to solidify these concepts. Consider a situation where a customer in a coffee shop spills hot coffee on themselves due to a loose lid. Identify the elements of a tort claim in this scenario. A Model Answer would be: - Duty of Care: The coffee shop owes a duty of care to its customers to provide properly secured lids on hot beverages. - Breach: The loose lid constitutes a breach of that duty, as it deviates from the reasonable standard of providing secure lids. - Causation: The loose lid directly caused the customer to spill hot coffee on themselves. - Damages: As a result of the spill, the customer suffered burns and required medical treatment, leading to measurable damages. Now, let's discuss the purpose of Tort Law in the legal system. Tort Law serves a vital role by providing a mechanism for individuals to seek remedies when they've suffered harm due to the wrongful actions of others. For instance, if a pedestrian is hit by a reckless driver, Tort Law enables the injured pedestrian to seek compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering caused by the accident. A significant case highlighting the purpose of Tort Law is "Donoghue v. Stevenson." In this case, a woman fell ill after consuming a drink from a bottle that contained a decomposed snail. The court's decision emphasized the idea of a duty of care owed to consumers and laid the foundation for the modern concept of negligence. Engaging in another interactive exercise, let's consider a situation where a manufacturer releases a defective product that leads to injuries. Discuss the purpose of Tort Law in such cases. A Model Answer would be: The purpose of Tort Law in cases involving defective products is to ensure that manufacturers are held accountable for producing safe products and preventing harm to consumers. It allows individuals who have suffered injuries due to defective products to seek compensation and encourages manufacturers to maintain high safety standards. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Welcome back, everyone, to the third part of our session on the Preamble and Articles of the U.S. Constitution. In the previous segments, we analyzed the significance of the Preamble and conducted a comprehensive examination of each Article of the Constitution. Today, we will delve into the Amendments of the Constitution, with a specific focus on the Bill of Rights and the critical additions that have shaped our legal landscape. Introduction to the Amendments. As we explore the Amendments, it's important to remember that the Constitution is not static. The Founding Fathers understood the need for flexibility and adaptation, and thus, they established a mechanism to amend the Constitution. Amendments can address emerging issues, correct shortcomings, and expand upon the fundamental rights protected by the Constitution. The Bill of Rights - First Ten Amendments. The Bill of Rights, the first ten Amendments to the Constitution, holds a special place in American history and jurisprudence. These Amendments were added in response to concerns about individual liberties and governmental power, serving as a check against potential abuses. Amendment I: Freedom of Religion, Speech, Press, Assembly, and Petition. The First Amendment guarantees the fundamental rights of freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition. These rights form the cornerstone of our democracy, ensuring that citizens can express their beliefs and opinions without fear of government interference. Amendment II: Right to Bear Arms. The Second Amendment protects the right of individuals to bear arms for self-defense and the defense of the nation. The interpretation of this Amendment has sparked debates about gun control and the balance between individual rights and public safety. Amendment III: Quartering of Soldiers. The Third Amendment prohibits the government from quartering soldiers in private homes during peacetime without the owner's consent. While less frequently litigated, it underscores the importance of protecting individual property rights. The Bill of Rights - Cont. Let's continue our exploration of the Bill of Rights: Amendment IV: Search and Seizure. The Fourth Amendment safeguards individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures by requiring warrants to be issued based on probable cause. It ensures the protection of personal privacy and limits the government's power to intrude into citizens' lives. Amendment V: Due Process, Double Jeopardy, Self-Incrimination The Fifth Amendment enshrines several important protections, including the right to due process of law, protection against double jeopardy, and the right to remain silent to avoid self-incrimination. Amendment VI: Right to a Fair Trial. The Sixth Amendment guarantees a fair and speedy trial, the right to confront witnesses, and the right to legal representation. It ensures that individuals accused of crimes have the opportunity to present their case and receive a fair hearing. Amendment VII: Right to Trial by Jury. The Seventh Amendment guarantees the right to a jury trial in civil cases involving disputes over property or money. This Amendment reflects the value placed on the judgment of one's peers. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Contract Interpretation and Construction Once a contract is formed, its terms must be interpreted and construed to determine the parties' rights and obligations. Law students should be familiar with various principles of contract interpretation, including: a) Plain Meaning Rule: Courts generally interpret contract language according to its plain and ordinary meaning, giving effect to the parties' intentions as expressed in the contract. b) Parol Evidence Rule: This rule restricts the admission of extrinsic evidence to vary or contradict the terms of a fully integrated written contract. c) Course of Dealing, Course of Performance, and Usage of Trade: These are interpretive aids used to understand the parties' intent when contract language is ambiguous or unclear. d) Ambiguity: Law students should recognize and address instances where contract terms are ambiguous, as this can lead to disputes and may require court intervention. Breach of Contract and Remedies When one party fails to fulfill its obligations under a contract, a breach occurs. Understanding the different types of breach and the available remedies is essential for law students preparing for the Bar Exam: a) Material vs. Minor Breach: Distinguishing between material breaches that go to the core of the contract and minor breaches is critical in assessing the appropriate remedies. b) Damages: Compensatory damages are designed to put the non-breaching party in the position they would have been in had the contract been fully performed. Consequential and incidental damages may also be available in certain situations. c) Specific Performance: Courts may order specific performance when monetary damages are inadequate to compensate the non-breaching party, typically in cases involving unique goods or real estate. d) Rescission and Restitution: Rescission allows the parties to undo the contract and return to their pre-contractual positions, while restitution requires the breaching party to return any benefits received from the non-breaching party. International Contracts In a globalized world, international contracts have become increasingly common. Law students should be familiar with the unique challenges and considerations that arise in international contract law: a) Choice of Law and Jurisdiction: Determining the applicable law and jurisdiction in international contracts can significantly impact the parties' rights and obligations. b) United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG): The CISG governs international sales contracts between parties from different member countries, providing uniform rules for contract formation, performance, and remedies. c) Forum Selection and Dispute Resolution: International contracts often involve complex forum selection clauses and may require resolving disputes through international arbitration or other dispute resolution mechanisms. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

In the United States, family laws and precedents as they relate to divorce, community property and alimony vary based on state law. Also, with new family models, "working couples", "working wives", "stay-at-home dads", etcetera, there are situations where some parties to a divorce question whether traditional economic allocations made in a divorce are fair and equitable to the facts of their individual case. Some groups have proposed various forms of legislation to reform alimony parameters (for example amounts and term). Alimony terms are among the most frequent issues causing litigation in family law cases. Eighty percent of divorce cases involve a request for modification of alimony. Some states (for example Florida, Texas, Maine) are moving away from permanent alimony awards that are intended to maintain a spouse's standard of living enjoyed during the marriage and are moving towards durational or rehabilitative alimony. In other states, like Mississippi and Tennessee, alimony is usually awarded for life. Some of the critical issues that proponents and opponents of alimony reform disagree upon are: Whether alimony should be temporary or permanent Regardless of duration, should alimony payers have the unquestionable right to retire? Does the lesser earning spouse deserve alimony to meet his or her basic needs (sustenance) or enough to sustain "the lifestyle accustomed to during the civil union or marriage"? Should the income and assets of a new spouse be used in determining how much alimony gets paid? How clear and prescriptive should state statutes be versus allowing a larger degree of Judicial Discretion? In 2012, bills were introduced in the New Jersey Assembly and Senate. The Assembly passed a bill calling for a Blue Ribbon Commission to address Alimony Reform. The Senate has a similar bill pending that has not yet been posted in the Judiciary Committee. The NJ Matrimonial Bar Association has been vehemently fighting against Alimony Reform, led by Patrick Judge Jr. chairman of the Family Law section of the New Jersey State Bar Association. Attorney Judge stated that the New Jersey State Bar Association ("NJSBA") objected to the inclusion of individuals with a vested interest in reforming alimony on the Blue Ribbon Commission and that the NJSBA supported the "establishment of a commission but only as long as the commission is constituted so that a fair and unbiased review of the current alimony laws takes place… should not be predisposed to an outcome…." In 2023 Florida passed an alimony reform bill (SB 1416) which eliminated permanent alimony and established a process for allowing alimony payers to request modifications when they want to retire. The bill allowed judges to reduce or terminate alimony obligations based on a number of factors. The passage came after decades of contentious debate garnering three vetoes of similar bills. Some groups that were previously major opponents of the reform approved of the 2023 policy, such as Florida Family Fairness and The Florida Bar. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Clause 4: Adjournment. Neither House, during the Session of Congress, shall, without the Consent of the other, adjourn for more than three days, nor to any other Place than that in which the two Houses shall be sitting. Neither House may adjourn, without the consent of the other, for more than three days. Often, a House will hold pro forma sessions every three days; such sessions are merely held to fulfill the constitutional requirement, and not to conduct business. Furthermore, neither House may meet in any place other than that designated for both Houses (the Capitol), without the consent of the other House. Section 6: Compensation, privileges, and restrictions on holding civil office. Clause 1: Compensation and legal protection. The Senators and Representatives shall receive a Compensation for their Services, to be ascertained by Law, and paid out of the Treasury of the United States. They shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their Attendance at the Session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place. Senators and representatives set their own compensation. Under the Twenty-seventh Amendment, any change in their compensation will not take effect until after the next congressional election. Paying senators and representatives out of the federal treasury was a departure from the practice under the Articles of Confederation, where they were paid by the state in which they were elected. Members of both houses have certain privileges, based on those enjoyed by the members of the British Parliament. Members attending, going to or returning from either house are privileged from arrest, except for treason, felony or breach of the peace. One may not sue a senator or representative for slander occurring during Congressional debate, nor may speech by a member of Congress during a Congressional session be the basis for criminal prosecution. The latter was affirmed when Mike Gravel published over 4,000 pages of the Pentagon Papers in the Congressional Record, which might have otherwise been a criminal offense. This clause has also been interpreted in Gravel v United States, (1972) to provide protection to aides and staff of sitting members of Congress, so long as their activities relate to legislative matters. Clause 2: Independence from the executive. No Senator or Representative shall, during the Time for which he was elected, be appointed to any civil Office under the Authority of the United States, which shall have been created, or the Emoluments whereof shall have been increased during such time; and no Person holding any Office under the United States, shall be a Member of either House during his Continuance in Office. Senators and representatives may not simultaneously serve in Congress and hold a position in the executive branch. This restriction is meant to protect legislative independence by preventing the president from using patronage to buy votes in Congress. It is a major difference from the Westminster political system in the British Parliament as well as those of some other nations using the parliamentary system, where cabinet ministers are required to be members of parliament. Furthermore, senators and representatives cannot resign to take newly created or higher-paying political positions; rather, they must wait until the conclusion of the term for which they were elected. If Congress increases the salary of a particular officer, it may later reduce that salary to permit an individual to resign from Congress and take that position (known as the Saxbe fix). --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Today marks the beginning of your journey into the intricate world of criminal law. As future legal practitioners, it's essential to grasp the foundational concepts that underpin our criminal justice system. Let's dive right in. Understanding the Purpose and Principles of Criminal Law. Criminal law serves a crucial role in society: maintaining order, protecting individuals and property, and upholding moral standards. It distinguishes between acceptable behavior and actions that warrant punishment. Criminal law seeks to balance the interests of public safety, individual rights, and justice. Remember, criminal law operates under the principle of "actus reus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea," meaning "an act does not make a person guilty unless there is a guilty mind." This brings us to our next point. Elements of a Crime: Actus Reus and Mens Rea. Any criminal offense consists of two main components: actus reus (the guilty act) and mens rea (the guilty mind). Actus reus refers to the physical action or omission that constitutes the crime. It's essential to establish that the defendant committed a voluntary act or failed to act when legally required. Mens rea, on the other hand, refers to the mental state of the defendant when committing the act. It ranges from intentional wrongdoing to negligence. Different crimes require different levels of mens rea, which we'll explore in depth throughout this course. For instance, consider the crime of murder. The actus reus involves causing the death of another person, while the mens rea might range from intent to kill (purposefully causing death) to recklessness (knowingly taking actions that could lead to death). --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Episode 1: Introduction to the Bar ExamIn this session we’ll cover: Overview of the Bar Exam and its significance. Understanding the format and structure of the exam. Strategies for effective preparation. Now welcome to "Mastering the Bar Exam," the podcast that will equip you with the knowledge and skills to ace the Bar Exam and become a successful attorney. I am your host, Dr. LegalMind, and I hold a Juris Doctor, a Master of Laws, and a Doctor of Juridical Science degree. I've written numerous books and taught at some of the most prestigious law schools in the U.S. My goal is to help you, aspiring law students, pass the Bar Exam with flying colors. In today's episode, we will begin our journey by providing an Introduction to the Bar Exam. We'll delve into its significance, understand the format and structure of the exam, and discuss strategies for effective preparation. First, let's talk about the Bar Exam itself. The Bar Exam is a crucial milestone in your legal career. It is the gateway to becoming a licensed attorney, allowing you to practice law in your jurisdiction. Without passing the Bar Exam, all your hard work and education in law school won't be enough to become a fully-fledged attorney. Imagine you've just completed your law school education and are eager to start your legal career. However, you can't take on any legal cases or represent clients until you've successfully passed the Bar Exam. The exam is a way to ensure that all attorneys possess the necessary knowledge and competence to serve their clients ethically and effectively. In one notable instance, a law graduate who was exceptionally talented failed the Bar Exam multiple times due to a lack of preparation and test-taking strategies. It was a harsh lesson that highlighted the importance of dedicated preparation and understanding the exam's requirements. Before we continue, take a moment to reflect on why passing the Bar Exam is significant for you. What motivated you to pursue a legal career, and how will becoming a licensed attorney help you achieve your goals? --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Welcome back, everyone, to the second part of our session on the Preamble and Articles of the U.S. Constitution. In the previous segment, we discussed the significance of the Preamble in setting the goals and guiding principles of our Constitution. Now, we will embark on a detailed examination of each Article of the Constitution, from Article 1 to Article 7. So, let's begin! Article 1 - The Legislative Branch. Article 1 establishes the first and most extensive branch of the U.S. government - the Legislative Branch. This branch is vested in the Congress of the United States, consisting of two chambers: the Senate and the House of Representatives. Section 1: Legislative Powers Vested in Congress. Article I grants Congress the authority to make laws for the nation, making it the primary law making body of the federal government. Section 2: House of Representatives. This section outlines the qualifications and selection process for members of the House of Representatives, including the number of representatives per state, their term lengths, and the process for filling vacancies. The House of Representatives is meant to be the "People's House," representing the interests of the citizens directly. Section 3: The Senate. Section 3 details the composition and role of the Senate, consisting of two senators from each state, elected by the state legislatures initially and later by popular vote. The Senate acts as a more deliberative body, representing state interests and providing a check on the House of Representatives. Section 4: Congressional Elections. This section grants state legislatures the power to determine the time, place, and manner of congressional elections. However, Congress can override these regulations if needed. Section 5: Rules and Procedures. Section 5 establishes the rules and procedures for each chamber of Congress, including quorum requirements, rules for discipline, and the freedom to judge the qualifications of its members. Section 6: Congressional Compensation and Privileges This section outlines the compensation of Congress members and protects them from arrest or civil lawsuits while attending sessions, except in cases of treason, felony, or breach of the peace. Section 7: The Legislative Process. Section 7 details the process by which bills become laws, including the requirement for both houses to pass a bill before it is presented to the President for approval or veto. Section 8: Enumerated Powers of Congress. This crucial section lists the specific powers granted to Congress, including the power to levy taxes, regulate commerce, coin money, and provide for the common defense and general welfare. These enumerated powers are the foundation for much of Congress's legislative authority. Section 9: Limits on Congress. Section 9 places limits on Congress's powers, such as prohibiting the suspension of habeas corpus, ex post facto laws, and bills of attainder. Additionally, it limits the ability to grant titles of nobility and directs that direct taxes be apportioned among the states based on their populations. Section 10: Limits on the States Section 10 sets limitations on the states, prohibiting them from entering into treaties, coining money, or passing bills of attainder, ex post facto laws, or laws impairing contracts. Article 2 - The Executive Branch. Article 2 establishes the second branch of the U.S. government - the Executive Branch. This branch is vested in the President of the United States, who serves as the head of state and government. Section 1: The President and Vice President. Article II outlines the qualifications, selection process, and term lengths for the President and Vice President. It also establishes the Electoral College as the method of electing the President. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Chapter 1: Introduction to Contracts Law. Understanding the Role of Contracts in Legal Practice. Contracts are fundamental legal instruments that play a pivotal role in various aspects of legal practice. They are agreements between two or more parties that create legally binding obligations enforceable by law. Understanding the nature and significance of contracts is crucial for law students and aspiring lawyers to navigate the complexities of contract law. Definition and Characteristics of Contracts. A contract can be defined as a legally enforceable agreement between two or more parties, where each party agrees to undertake certain rights and responsibilities. For a contract to be valid, it must satisfy essential elements, including: a) Offer and Acceptance: The formation of a contract begins with an offer by one party and its acceptance by the other, resulting in mutual assent to the contract's terms. b) Consideration: Contracts must involve some form of consideration, which is a bargained-for exchange of value between the parties. Consideration can be money, goods, services, or a promise to do or refrain from doing something. c) Legal Purpose: Contracts must have a lawful purpose and cannot be created for illegal activities or against public policy. d) Capacity: Each party must have the legal capacity to enter into the contract. This means they must be of sound mind, of legal age, and not under undue influence or duress. Importance of Contracts in Legal Transactions. Contracts serve as the foundation of business and personal transactions. They provide a framework for individuals and entities to define their rights and obligations, allocate risks, and ensure enforceability in case of disputes. The significance of contracts in various legal scenarios includes: a) Business Agreements: Contracts are vital for businesses to engage in transactions with suppliers, customers, employees, and other stakeholders. They govern sales, leases, employment agreements, and partnerships, among others. b) Real Estate Transactions: Contracts are used in buying, selling, leasing, and financing real estate properties, ensuring clear terms for both buyers and sellers. c) Construction Contracts: In construction projects, contracts establish the scope of work, timelines, payment terms, and quality standards. d) Intellectual Property Licensing: Contracts play a crucial role in licensing intellectual property rights, such as patents, trademarks, and copyrights. e) Commercial Contracts: These encompass various agreements, including service contracts, distribution agreements, franchise contracts, and more. Historical Development of Contract Law. The principles of modern contract law have evolved over centuries of legal history. Early legal systems, such as Roman law and English common law, laid the groundwork for modern contract law. Notable cases and legal developments that have shaped contract law include: a) Case of Hadley v. Baxendale (1854): This landmark English case established the principle of foreseeability in contract damages, stating that damages should be limited to what was reasonably foreseeable at the time of contract formation. b) Restatement (Second) of Contracts: The Restatement, published by the American Law Institute (ALI), provides authoritative guidance on contract law and has influenced courts in various jurisdictions. c) Uniform Commercial Code (UCC): The UCC, adopted by most U.S. states, governs commercial transactions, including the sale of goods, simplifying and unifying contract law across states. d) Modern Contract Interpretation: Courts have shifted towards an objective approach to contract interpretation, focusing on the parties' intent as expressed in the contract's language. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Alimony, also called aliment (Scotland), maintenance (England, Ireland, Northern Ireland, Wales, Canada, New Zealand), spousal support (U.S., Canada) and spouse maintenance (Australia), is a legal obligation on a person to provide financial support to their spouse before or after marital separation or divorce. The obligation arises from the divorce law or family law of each country. In most jurisdictions, it is distinct from child support, where, after divorce, one parent is required to contribute to the support of their children by paying money to the child's other parent or guardian. Etymology. The term alimony comes from the Latin word alimonia ("nourishment, sustenance", from alere, "to nourish"), from which the terms alimentary (of, or relating to food, nutrition, or digestion), and aliment (a Scots Law rule regarding sustenance to assure the wife's lodging, food, clothing, and other necessities after divorce) are also derived. History. The Code of Hammurabi (1754 BC) declares that a man must provide sustenance to a woman who has borne him children so that she can raise them: 137. If a man wish to separate from a woman who has borne him children, or from his wife who has borne him children: then he shall give that wife her dowry, and a part of the usufruct of field, garden, and property, so that she can rear her children. When she has brought up her children, a portion of all that is given to the children, equal as that of one son, shall be given to her. She may then marry the man of her heart. The above law only applies to women who had children with her husband. This fits more closely with the definition of child support in some jurisdictions. Alimony is also discussed in the Code of Justinian. The modern concept of alimony is derived from English ecclesiastical courts that awarded alimony in cases of separation and divorce. Alimony pendente lite was given until the divorce decree, based on the husband's duty to support the wife during a marriage that still continued. Post-divorce or permanent alimony was also based on the notion that the marriage continued, as ecclesiastical courts could only award a divorce a mensa et thoro, similar to a legal separation today. As divorce did not end the marriage, the husband's duty to support his wife remained intact. Liberalization of divorce laws occurred in the 19th century, but divorce was only possible in cases of marital misconduct. As a result, the requirement to pay alimony became linked to the concept of fault in the divorce. Alimony to wives was paid because it was assumed that the marriage, and the wife's right to support, would have continued but for the misbehavior of the husband. Ending alimony on divorce would have permitted a guilty husband to profit from his own misconduct. In contrast, if the wife committed the misconduct, she was considered to have forfeited any claim to ongoing support. However, during the period, parties could rarely afford alimony, and so it was rarely awarded by courts. As husbands' incomes increased, and with it the possibility of paying alimony, the awarding of alimony increased, generally because a wife could show a need for ongoing financial support, and the husband had the ability to pay. No-fault divorce led to changes in alimony. Whereas spousal support was considered a right under the fault-based system, it became conditional under the no-fault approach. According to the American Bar Association, marital fault is a "factor" in awarding alimony in 25 states and the District of Columbia. Permanent alimony began to fall out of favor, as it prevented former spouses from beginning new lives, though in some states (for example, Massachusetts, Mississippi, and Tennessee), permanent alimony awards continued, but with some limitations. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Clause 7: Judgment in cases of impeachment; Punishment on conviction. Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law. If any officer or the President or the Vice President is convicted of impeachment, that person is immediately removed from office and may be barred from holding any federal office in the future. This is purely a political remedy which "touches neither his person, nor his property; but simply divests him of his political capacity," however the convicted person remains liable to trial and punishment in the courts for civil and criminal charges. The President cannot reinstate an impeached officer with his Article 2 appointment power if such officers have been disqualified to hold any future federal office as part of their conviction. Section 4: Congressional elections and sessions. Clause 1: Time, place, and manner of holding elections. The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of choosing Senators. The purpose of this clause is twofold. First, it makes clear the division of responsibility with respect to the conduct of the election of federal senators and representatives. That responsibility lies primarily with the states and secondarily with Congress. Second, the clause lodges the power to regulate elections in the respective legislative branches of the states and the federal government. As authorized by this clause, Congress has set a uniform date for federal elections: the Tuesday following the first Monday in November. Presently, as there are no on-point federal regulations, the states retain the authority to regulate the dates on which other aspects of the election process are held (registration, primary elections, for example) and where elections will be held. As for regulating the "manner" of elections, the Supreme Court has interpreted this to mean "matters like notices, registration, supervision of voting, protection of voters, prevention of fraud and corrupt practices, counting of votes, duties of inspectors and canvassers, and making and publication of election returns." The Supreme Court has held that States may not exercise their power to determine the "manner" of holding elections to impose term limits on their congressional delegation. One of the most significant ways that each state regulates the "manner" of elections is through their power to draw electoral districts. Although in theory Congress could draw the district map for each State, it has not exercised this level of oversight. Congress has, however, required the States to conform to certain practices when drawing districts. States are currently required to use a single-member district scheme, whereby the State is divided into as many election districts for Representatives in the House of Representatives as the size of its representation in that body (that is to say, Representatives cannot be elected at-large from the whole State unless the State has only one Representative in the House, nor can districts elect more than 1 Representative). The Supreme Court has interpreted "by the Legislature thereof" to include the state governor's veto, and the initiative process, in those states whose constitutions provide it. This conclusion has been challenged, however, by the independent state legislature theory, which may have growing support on the Supreme Court. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Employee rights. Derivative suits. Because directors owe their duties to the corporation and not, as a general rule, to specific shareholders or stakeholders, the right to sue for breaches of directors duty rests by default with the corporation itself. The corporation is necessarily a party to the suit. This creates a difficulty because almost always, the right to litigate falls under the general powers of directors to manage the corporation day to day (for example Delaware General Corporation Law §141(a)). Often, cases arise (such as in Broz v Cellular Information Systems Incorporated) where an action is brought against a director because the corporation has been taken over and a new, non-friendly board is in place, or because the board has been replaced after bankruptcy. Otherwise, there is a possibility of a conflict of interest because directors will be reluctant to sue their colleagues, particularly when they develop personal ties. The law has sought to define further cases where groups other than directors can sue for breaches of duty. First, many jurisdictions outside the US allow a specific percentage of shareholders to bring a claim as of right (for example 1 per cent). This solution may still entail significant collective action problems where shareholders are dispersed, like the US. Second, some jurisdictions give standing to sue to non-shareholder groups, particularly creditors, whose collective action problems are less. Otherwise, third, the main alternative is that any individual shareholder may "derive" a claim on the corporation's behalf to sue for breach of duty, but such a derivative suit will be subject to permission from the court. The risk of allowing individual shareholders to bring derivative suits is usually thought to be that it could encourage costly, distracting litigation, or "strike suits" – or simply that litigation (even if the director is guilty of a breach of duty) could be seen as counterproductive by a majority of shareholders or stakeholders who have no conflicts of interest. Accordingly, it is generally thought that oversight by the court is justified to ensure derivative suits match the corporation's interests as a whole because courts may be more independent. However, especially from the 1970s some states, and especially Delaware, began also to require that the board have a role. Most common law jurisdictions have abandoned the role for the board in derivative claims, and in most US states before the 1980s, the board's role was no more than a formality. But then, a formal role for the board was reintroduced. In the procedure to bring a derivative suit, the first step is often that the shareholder had to make a "demand" on the board to bring a claim. Although it might appear strange to ask a group of directors who will be sued, or whose colleagues are being sued, for permission, Delaware courts took the view that the decision to litigate ought by default to lie within the legitimate scope of directors' business judgment. For example, in Aronson v Lewis a shareholder of the Meyers Parking System Inc claimed that the board had improperly wasted corporate assets by giving its 75-year-old director, Mr Fink, a large salary and bonus for consultancy work even though the contract did not require performance of any work. Mr Fink had also personally selected all of the directors. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Introduction to the Preamble. The Preamble of the U.S. Constitution serves as an eloquent and powerful introduction to the document. It begins with the iconic words, "We the People of the United States," emphasizing that the authority and power of the government originate from the citizens it serves. The Preamble sets the tone for the Constitution, expressing the collective vision and aspirations of the Founding Fathers. Setting the Goals of the Constitution. Let's now explore the Preamble's text to understand the goals it establishes for our government. It reads as follows: "We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America." Forming a More Perfect Union. The Preamble's first goal is to "form a more perfect Union." This phrase addresses the imperfections of the previous system under the Articles of Confederation and highlights the Founding Fathers' desire to create a stronger and more unified nation. They recognized that a cohesive union was essential for the country's stability and prosperity. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

A special needs trust, also known in some jurisdictions as a supplemental needs trust, is a specialized trust that allows the disabled beneficiary to enjoy the use of property that is held in the trust for his or her benefit, while at the same time allowing the beneficiary to receive essential needs-based government benefits. A Special Needs Trust is a specific type of irrevocable trust that exists under Common Law. Several Common Law nations have established specific statutes relative to the creation and use of Special Needs Trusts, and where they exist a Special Needs Trust will not be valid unless it comports with the requirements listed in the statute. The applicable Federal statute in the United States is found at Title 42 United States Code. Several States have established their own statutes. Generally, irrevocable trusts can be used for minors, beneficiaries with physical or mental challenges, and as a method of asset protection. In addition to the public benefits preservation reasons for such a trust, there are administrative advantages of using a trust to hold and manage property intended for the benefit of the beneficiary, especially if the beneficiary lacks the legal capacity to handle his or her own financial affairs. Special needs trusts may also be useful for people who are planning for possible future disability. Throughout the world. A trust for a beneficiary with disability may be set up in any of the common law countries, including the United States, and also in other countries that recognize the concept of a "trust." In such jurisdictions, there is often legislation that provides advantages to such trusts in the areas of taxation and state benefits, for example, in Ireland and the United Kingdom. In the United States of America, such trusts provide advantages in helping beneficiaries qualify for health care coverage under state Medicaid programs, and also for monthly cash payments under the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program operated by the Social Security Administration. Overview. Special needs trusts can provide benefits to, and protect the assets of, minors and the physically challenged or the mentally challenged. Special needs trusts are frequently used to receive an inheritance or personal injury settlement proceeds on behalf of a minor or a person with disability, or are founded from the proceeds of compensation for criminal injuries, litigation or insurance settlements. A common feature of trusts in all common law jurisdictions is that they may be run either by family members (a private trust) or by trustees appointed by the court. Especially where a trust is to be established for a child or young person with disability, great care is generally taken in the choice of appropriate trustees to manage the trust assets and to deal with future replacement appointments. The use of a private discretionary trust can not only be more efficient in terms of taxation and access to government benefits but can also allow for more efficient investment of funds held than where funds are held by a court official (such as the Official Receiver in England and Wales). However where no appropriate trustees can be found, for example on the death of existing trustees, the court will intervene. Special needs trusts are often set up under the guidance of a structured settlement planner in cooperation with a qualified legal and financial team to ensure the trust is set up correctly. Only authorized non-profit organizations are approved to manage a special needs trust program. Such pooled trusts are available throughout the United States and are often centered on certain purposes (often disabilities). --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Today, every state plus the District of Columbia permits no-fault divorce, though requirements for obtaining a no-fault divorce vary. California was the first U.S. state to enact a no-fault divorce law. Its law was signed by Governor Ronald Reagan, a divorced and remarried former movie actor, and came into effect in 1970. New York was the last state to enact a no-fault divorce law; that law was passed in 2010. Before no-fault divorce was available, spouses seeking divorce would often allege false grounds for divorce. Removing the incentive to perjure was one motivation for the no-fault movement. In the States of Wisconsin, Oregon, Washington, Nevada, Nebraska, Montana, Missouri, Minnesota, Michigan, Kentucky, Kansas, Illinois, Iowa, Indiana, Hawaii, Florida, Colorado and California, a person seeking a divorce is not permitted to allege a fault-based ground (for example adultery, abandonment or cruelty). Requirements before the enactment of no-fault divorce. Prior to the advent of no-fault divorce, a divorce was processed through the adversarial system as a civil action, meaning that a divorce could be obtained only through a showing of fault of one (and only one) of the parties in a marriage. This required that one spouse plead that the other had committed adultery, abandonment, felony, or other similarly culpable acts. However, the other spouse could plead a variety of defenses, like recrimination (essentially an accusation of "so did you"). A judge could find that the respondent had not committed the alleged act or the judge could accept the defense of recrimination and find both spouses at fault for the dysfunctional nature of their marriage. Either of these two findings was sufficient to defeat an action for divorce, which meant that the parties remained married. In some states, requirements were even more stringent. For instance, under its original (1819) constitution, Alabama required not only the consent of a court of chancery for a divorce (and only "in cases provided for by law"), but equally that of two-thirds of both houses of the state legislature. The required vote in this case was even stricter than that required to overturn the governor's veto in Alabama, which required only a simple majority of both houses of the General Assembly. This requirement was dropped in 1861, when the state adopted a new constitution at the outset of the American Civil War. Bypassing the showing-of-fault requirements for divorce. These requirements could be problematic if both spouses were at fault or if neither spouse had committed a legally culpable act but both spouses desired a divorce by mutual consent. Lawyers began to advise their clients on how to manufacture "legal fictions" to bypass the statutory requirements, with the result that by the 1920s, the actual operation of the legal system was "completely at odds with statute and case law". One method popular in New York was referred to as "collusive adultery", in which the husband would check into a hotel with a "mistress" obtained for the occasion. A photographer, also obtained for the occasion, would suddenly appear out of nowhere to take snapshots of the husband and his "mistress" in flagrante delicto. Upon presentation of the photos in court, the judge would convict the husband of adultery, and the couple could be divorced. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Employee rights. While investment managers tend to exercise most voting rights in corporations, bought with pension, life insurance and mutual fund money, employees also exercise voice through collective bargaining rules in labor law. Increasingly, corporate law has converged with labor law. The United States is in a minority of Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries that, as yet, has no law requiring employee voting rights in corporations, either in the general meeting or for representatives on the board of directors. On the other hand, the United States has the oldest voluntary codetermination statute for private corporations, in Massachusetts since 1919 passed under the Republican governor Calvin Coolidge, enabling manufacturing companies to have employee representatives on the board of directors, if corporate stockholders agreed. Also in 1919 both Procter & Gamble and the General Ice Delivery Company of Detroit had employee representation on boards. In the early 20th century, labor law theory split between those who advocated collective bargaining backed by strike action, those who advocated a greater role for binding arbitration, and proponents of codetermination as "industrial democracy". Today, these methods are seen as complements, not alternatives. A majority of countries in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development have laws requiring direct participation rights. In 1994, the Dunlop Commission on the Future of Worker-Management Relations: Final Report examined law reform to improve collective labor relations, and suggested minor amendments to encourage worker involvement. Congressional division prevented federal reform, but labor unions and state legislatures have experimented. Corporations are chartered under state law, the larger mostly in Delaware, but leave investors free to organize voting rights and board representation as they choose. Because of unequal bargaining power, but also historic caution of labor unions, shareholders monopolize voting rights in American corporations. From the 1970s employees and unions sought representation on company boards. This could happen through collective agreements, as it historically occurred in Germany or other countries, or through employees demanding further representation through employee stock ownership plans, but they aimed for a voice independent from capital risks that could not be diversified. Corporations where workers attempted to secure board representation included United Airlines, the General Tire and Rubber Company, and the Providence and Worcester Railroad. However, in 1974 the Securities and Exchange Commission, run by appointees of Richard Nixon, rejected that employees who held shares in AT&T were entitled to make proposals to include employee representatives on the board of directors. This position was eventually reversed expressly by the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010 §971, which subject to rules by the Securities and Exchange Commission entitles shareholders to put forward nominations for the board. Instead of pursuing board seats through shareholder resolutions, for example, the United Auto Workers successfully sought board representation by collective agreement at Chrysler in 1980, and the United SteelWorkers secured board representation in five corporations in 1993. However, it was clear that employee stock ownership plans were open to abuse, particularly after Enron collapsed in 2003. Workers had been enticed to invest an average of 62.5 percent of their retirement savings from 401(k) plans in Enron stock, against basic principles of prudent, diversified investment, and had no board representation. This meant, employees lost a majority of pension savings. For this reason, employees and unions have sought representation simply for investment of labor, without taking on undiversifiable capital risk. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Clause 2: Classification of senators; Vacancies. Immediately after they shall be assembled in Consequence of the first Election, they shall be divided as equally as may be into three Classes. The Seats of the Senators of the first Class shall be vacated at the Expiration of the second Year, of the second Class at the Expiration of the fourth Year, and of the third Class at the Expiration of the sixth Year, so that one third may be chosen every second Year; and if Vacancies happen by Resignation, or otherwise, during the Recess of the Legislature of any State, the Executive thereof may make temporary Appointments until the next Meeting of the Legislature, which shall then fill such Vacancies. After the first group of senators was elected to the First Congress (1789–1791), the senators were divided into three "classes" as nearly equal in size as possible, as required by this section. This was done in May 1789 by lot. It was also decided that each state's senators would be assigned to two different classes. Those senators grouped in the first class had their term expire after only two years; those senators in the second class had their term expire after only four years, instead of six. After this, all senators from those states have been elected to six-year terms, and as new states have joined the Union, their Senate seats have been assigned to two of the three classes, maintaining each grouping as nearly equal in size as possible. In this way, election is staggered; approximately one-third of the Senate is up for reelection every two years, but the entire body is never up for re-election in the same year (as contrasted with the House, where its entire membership is up for reelection every 2 years). As originally established, senators were elected by the Legislature of the State they represented in the Senate. If a senator died, resigned, or was expelled, the legislature of the state would appoint a replacement to serve out the remainder of the senator's term. If the state legislature was not in session, its governor could appoint a temporary replacement to serve until the legislature could elect a permanent replacement. This was superseded by the Seventeenth Amendment, which provided for the popular election of senators, instead of their appointment by the state legislature. In a nod to the less populist nature of the Senate, the amendment tracks the vacancy procedures for the House of Representatives in requiring that the governor call a special election to fill the vacancy, but (unlike in the House) it vests in the state legislature the authority to allow the governor to appoint a temporary replacement until the special election is held. Note, however, that under the original Constitution, the governors of the states were expressly allowed by the Constitution to make temporary appointments. The current system, under the Seventeenth Amendment, allows governors to appoint a replacement only if their state legislature has previously decided to allow the governor to do so; otherwise, the seat must remain vacant until the special election is held to fill the seat, as in the case of a vacancy in the House. Clause 3: Qualifications of senators. No Person shall be a Senator who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty Years, and been nine Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State for which he shall be chosen. A senator must be at least 30 years of age, must have been a citizen of the United States for at least nine years before being elected, and must reside in the State they will represent at the time of the election. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Course Title and Objectives. Let's start by looking at the title of our course: "Constitutional Law: Sources and Principles." As the title suggests, we will delve into the various sources of constitutional law and examine the fundamental principles that underpin it. Importance of the U.S. Constitution. Now, why is it essential to study the U.S. Constitution? The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, serving as the foundation for our legal system and the framework upon which our government operates. It establishes the structure of our government, outlines the powers and limitations of each branch, and safeguards individual rights. Understanding the Constitution is crucial for any lawyer, as it forms the basis of our legal framework. Historical Context and Drafting of the Constitution. Before we delve into the Constitution's content, let's take a step back and examine its historical context. The Constitution was drafted in the late 18th century, following the American Revolutionary War and the failure of the Articles of Confederation. It was a result of the collective efforts and compromises of the Founding Fathers, who sought to create a more effective and unified system of government. Basic Structure of the Constitution. Now, let's explore the basic structure of the Constitution. It is divided into three main parts: the Preamble, the Articles, and the Amendments. The Preamble sets out the broad goals and purposes of the Constitution, while the Articles outline the powers, functions, and limitations of the three branches of government: the Legislative Branch (Article 1), the Executive Branch (Article2), and the Judicial Branch (Article 3). The Amendments, on the other hand, add to and modify the original provisions of the Constitution. Preamble and its Significance. Let's focus on the Preamble for a moment. The Preamble serves as an introductory statement that outlines the goals and objectives of the Constitution. It begins with the famous words, "We the People," which reflect the idea that the power of the government emanates from the citizens. The Preamble sets the stage for the subsequent Articles and Amendments, guiding the interpretation and application of the Constitution --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

An honorary trust, under the law of trusts, is a device by which a person establishes a trust for which there is neither a charitable purpose, nor a private beneficiary to enforce the trust. While such a trust would normally be void for lack of a beneficiary, many jurisdictions have carved out two specific exceptions to this rule: trusts for the care of that person's pets; and trusts to provide for the maintenance of cemetery plots. The name of the device derives from the lack of any beneficiary legally capable of enforcing an honorary trust: the trustee is bound by honor, but not by law, to carry out the wishes of the creator of the trust. Like many states, New York has only recently allowed such trusts by statute. An asset-protection trust is any form of trust which provides for funds to be held on a discretionary basis. Such trusts are set up in an attempt to avoid or mitigate the effects of taxation, divorce and bankruptcy on the beneficiary. Such trusts are therefore frequently proscribed or limited in their effects by governments and the courts. The asset-protection trust is a trust that splits the beneficial enjoyment of trust assets from their legal ownership. The beneficiaries of a trust are the beneficial owners of equitable interests in the trust assets, but they do not hold legal title to the assets. Thus this kind of trust fulfills the goal of asset protection planning, for example to insulate assets from claims of creditors without concealment or tax evasion. A creditor's ability to satisfy a judgment against a beneficiary's interest in a trust is limited to the beneficiary's interest in such trust. Consequently, the common goal of asset protection trusts is to limit the interests of beneficiaries in such a way so as to preclude creditors from collecting against trust assets. Such trusts must be irrevocable (a revocable trust will not provide asset protection because and to the extent of the settlor's power to revoke). Most of them contain a spendthrift clause preventing a trust beneficiary from alienating his or her expected interest in favor of a creditor. The spendthrift clause has three general exceptions to the protection afforded: the self-settled trusts (if the settlor of a trust is also a beneficiary of a trust), the case when a debtor is the sole beneficiary and the sole trustee of a trust, and the support payments (a court may order the trustee to satisfy a beneficiary's support obligation to a former spouse or minor child). The first general exception, which accounts for the majority of asset protection trusts, no longer applies in several jurisdictions. The laws of certain jurisdictions including Alaska, Bermuda, and the Cayman Islands allow self-settled trusts to afford their settlors the protection of the spendthrift clause. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Grounds for divorce are regulations specifying the circumstances under which a person will be granted a divorce. Adultery is the most common grounds for divorce. However, there are countries that view male adultery differently than female adultery as grounds for divorce. Before decisions on divorce are considered, one might check into state laws and country laws for legal divorce or separation as each culture has stipulations for divorce. Grounds for divorce. Cruel and inhuman treatment constitute grounds for divorce. In a proper defense, acceptable differences enable the defendant to have the ability to arrange grounds for divorce. Some examples for grounds for divorce are: Sexual harassment, Attendant circumstance, Adulter, Alcoholism, Disability, Desertion, Imprisonment, and Domestic violence (Including physical, sexual, or mental abuse of the other spouse and or the child or children of the couple.) The spouse that is responsible for committing these allegations is required to confirm the correct date and place that the allegations were committed. The reason for the spouse to confirm the allegations is to show proof that the allegations have taken place in the same state. The state then has to have the authority to administer justice by hearing and determining the controversies. Different states accept different grounds for divorce. For example, some states only accept no-fault divorce where other states accept both fault and no-fault grounds for divorce. No-fault divorce is the dissolution of a marriage that does not require a showing of wrongdoing by either party. Laws providing for no-fault divorce allow a family court to grant a divorce in response to a petition by either party of the marriage without requiring the petitioner to provide evidence that the defendant has committed a breach of the marital contract. History. In early modern Europe, Prussia took a pioneering role with Frederick the Great's 1757 edict allowing marriages to be resolved on the ground of serious and continuous hostility between spouses, without pointing to any one guilty party. This early example of no-fault divorce was expanded on and formalized with the 1794 General State Laws for the Prussian States, which allowed childless couples to file for divorce without giving a ground. The first modern no-fault divorce law was enacted in Russia in December 1917 following the October Revolution of the same year. Regarding marriage as a bourgeois institution, the new government transferred divorce jurisdiction from the Russian Orthodox Church to the state courts, which could grant it on application of either spouse. Alimony guarantees under the new regime were weak until a new family code was passed in 1926. With a law adopted in 1969, California became the first U.S. state to permit no-fault divorce. California's law was framed on a roughly contemporaneous effort of the non-governmental organization National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, which began drafting a model of no-fault divorce statute for states to consider in 1967. The Uniform Marriage and Divorce Act (UMDA) is a model law in the United States and has been used since 1970. Australia established no-fault divorce in 1975, with the only ground for divorce being irretrievable breakdown of marriage, evidenced by a twelve-month separation. Canada effectively permitted no-fault divorce in 1986 by reducing the separation period to one year. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

While investment managers tend to exercise most voting rights in corporations, bought with pension, life insurance and mutual fund money, employees also exercise voice through collective bargaining rules in labor law. Increasingly, corporate law has converged with labor law. The United States is in a minority of Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries that, as yet, has no law requiring employee voting rights in corporations, either in the general meeting or for representatives on the board of directors. On the other hand, the United States has the oldest voluntary codetermination statute for private corporations, in Massachusetts since 1919 passed under the Republican governor Calvin Coolidge, enabling manufacturing companies to have employee representatives on the board of directors, if corporate stockholders agreed. Also in 1919 both Procter & Gamble and the General Ice Delivery Company of Detroit had employee representation on boards. In the early 20th century, labor law theory split between those who advocated collective bargaining backed by strike action, those who advocated a greater role for binding arbitration, and proponents of codetermination as "industrial democracy". Today, these methods are seen as complements, not alternatives. A majority of countries in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development have laws requiring direct participation rights. In 1994, the Dunlop Commission on the Future of Worker-Management Relations: Final Report examined law reform to improve collective labor relations, and suggested minor amendments to encourage worker involvement. Congressional division prevented federal reform, but labor unions and state legislatures have experimented. Corporations are chartered under state law, the larger mostly in Delaware, but leave investors free to organize voting rights and board representation as they choose. Because of unequal bargaining power, but also historic caution of labor unions, shareholders monopolize voting rights in American corporations. From the 1970s employees and unions sought representation on company boards. This could happen through collective agreements, as it historically occurred in Germany or other countries, or through employees demanding further representation through employee stock ownership plans, but they aimed for a voice independent from capital risks that could not be diversified. Corporations where workers attempted to secure board representation included United Airlines, the General Tire and Rubber Company, and the Providence and Worcester Railroad. However, in 1974 the Securities and Exchange Commission, run by appointees of Richard Nixon, rejected that employees who held shares in AT&T were entitled to make proposals to include employee representatives on the board of directors. This position was eventually reversed expressly by the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010 §971, which subject to rules by the Securities and Exchange Commission entitles shareholders to put forward nominations for the board. Instead of pursuing board seats through shareholder resolutions, for example, the United Auto Workers successfully sought board representation by collective agreement at Chrysler in 1980, and the United SteelWorkers secured board representation in five corporations in 1993. However, it was clear that employee stock ownership plans were open to abuse, particularly after Enron collapsed in 2003. Workers had been enticed to invest an average of 62.5 percent of their retirement savings from 401(k) plans in Enron stock, against basic principles of prudent, diversified investment, and had no board representation. This meant, employees lost a majority of pension savings. For this reason, employees and unions have sought representation simply for investment of labor, without taking on undiversifiable capital risk. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Clause 2: Qualifications of Members. No Person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained to the Age of twenty five Years, and been seven Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen. The Constitution provides three requirements for Representatives: A Representative must be at least 25 years old, must be an inhabitant of the state in which he or she is elected, and must have been a citizen of the United States for the previous seven years. There is no requirement that a Representative reside within the district in which he or she represents; although this is usually the case, there have been occasional exceptions. The Supreme Court has interpreted the Qualifications Clause as an exclusive list of qualifications that cannot be supplemented by a house of Congress exercising its Section 5 authority to "judge...the...qualifications of its own members" or by a state in its exercise of its Section 4 authority to prescribe the "times, places and manner of holding elections for Senators and Representatives." The Supreme Court, as well as other federal courts, have repeatedly barred states from additional restrictions, such as imposing term limits on members of Congress, allowing members of Congress to be subject to recall elections, or requiring that Representatives live in the congressional district in which they represent. A 2002 Congressional Research Service report also found that no state could implement a qualification that a Representative not be a convicted felon or incarcerated. However, the United States Supreme Court has ruled that certain ballot access requirements, such as filing fees and submitting a certain number of valid petition signatures do not constitute additional qualifications and thus few Constitutional restrictions exist as to how harsh ballot access laws can be. Finally, although the U.S. Constitution places no restrictions on state or local office-holders simultaneously holding federal office, most state constitutions today effectively ban state and local office holders from also holding federal office at the same time by prohibiting federal office holders from also holding state and local office. Unlike other state-mandated restrictions, these sorts of prohibitions are constitutional as long they are enforced purely at the state level (for example against active federal office holders seeking to obtain or hold a state or local office). Clause 3: Apportionment of Representatives and taxes. Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons. The actual Enumeration shall be made within three Years after the first Meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct. The number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty Thousand, but each State shall have at Least one Representative; and until such enumeration shall be made, the State of New Hampshire shall be entitled to chuse three, Massachusetts eight, Rhode-Island and Providence Plantations one, Connecticut five, New-York six, New Jersey four, Pennsylvania eight, Delaware one, Maryland six, Virginia ten, North Carolina five, South Carolina five, and Georgia three. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

The right of self-defense (also called, when it applies to the defense of another, alter ego defense, defense of others, defense of a third person) is the right for people to use reasonable or defensive force, for the purpose of defending one's own life (self-defense) or the lives of others, including – in certain circumstances – the use of deadly force. If a defendant uses defensive force because of a threat of deadly or grievous harm by the other person, or a reasonable perception of such harm, the defendant is said to have a "perfect self-defense" justification. If the defendant uses defensive force because of such a perception, and the perception is not reasonable, the defendant may have an "imperfect self-defense" as an excuse. General concepts – legal theory. Justification does not make a criminal use of force lawful; if the use of force is justified, it cannot be criminal at all. The early theories make no distinction between defense of the person and defense of property. Whether consciously or not, this builds on the Roman Law principle of dominium where any attack on the members of the family or the property it owned was a personal attack on the pater familias – the male head of the household, sole owner of all property belonging to the household, and endowed by law with dominion over all his descendants through the male line no matter their age. The right to self-defense is phrased as the principle of vim vi repellere licet ("it is permitted to repel force by force") in the Digest of Justitian (6th century). Another early application of this was Martin Luther's concept of justified resistance against a Beerwolf ruler, which was used in the doctrine of the lesser magistrate propounded in the 1550 Magdeburg Confession. In Leviathan (1651), Hobbes (using the English term self-defense for the first time) proposed the foundation political theory that distinguishes between a state of nature where there is no authority and a modern state. Hobbes argues that although some may be stronger or more intelligent than others in their natural state, none are so strong as to be beyond a fear of violent death, which justifies self-defense as the highest necessity. In the Two Treatises of Government, John Locke asserts the reason why an owner would give up their autonomy: ...the enjoyment of the property he has in this state is very unsafe, very insecure. This makes him willing to quit a condition, which, however free, is full of fears and continual dangers: and it is not without reason, that he seeks out, and is willing to join in society with others, who are already united, or have a mind to unite, for the mutual preservation of their lives, liberties and estates, which many call by the general name, property. In earlier times before the development of national policing, an attack on the family home was effectively either an assault on the people actually inside or an indirect assault on their welfare by depriving them of shelter and or the means of production. This linkage between a personal attack and property weakened as societies developed but the threat of violence remains a key factor. As an aspect of sovereignty, in his 1918 speech Politik als Beruf (Politics as a Vocation), Max Weber defined a state as an authority claiming the monopoly on the legitimate use of physical force within defined territorial boundaries. Recognizing that the modern framework of nations has emerged from the use of force, Weber asserted that the exercise of power through the institutions of government remained indispensable for effective government at any level which necessarily implies that self-help is limited if not excluded. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

In American estate planning parlance, an incentive trust is a trust designed to encourage or discourage certain behaviors by using distributions of trust income or principal as an incentive. A typical incentive trust might encourage a beneficiary to complete a degree, enter a profession, or abstain from harmful conduct such as substance abuse. The beneficiary might be paid a certain amount of money from the trust upon graduating from college, or the trust might pay a dollar of income from the trust for every dollar the beneficiary earns. The Protective Trust is a form of settlement found in England and Wales and several Commonwealth countries. It has marked similarities to asset-protection trusts found in several offshore jurisdictions and US Spendthrift trusts. In such a trust assets are ordinarily held to pay an income to the beneficiary. The beneficiary may also have access to capital of the trust with the trustee's permission. The right to receive income from a trust would ordinarily be an asset in the hands of the beneficiary and could be sold, thwarting the intention of the donor to spread the gift over the recipient's lifetime. Additionally on a bankruptcy the right to the income would be sold by the beneficiary's trustee in bankruptcy. The Protective Trust is a form of settlement found in England and Wales and several Commonwealth countries. It has marked similarities to asset-protection trusts found in several offshore jurisdictions and US Spendthrift trusts. In such a trust assets are ordinarily held to pay an income to the beneficiary. The beneficiary may also have access to capital of the trust with the trustee's permission. The right to receive income from a trust would ordinarily be an asset in the hands of the beneficiary and could be sold, thwarting the intention of the donor to spread the gift over the recipient's lifetime. Additionally on a bankruptcy the right to the income would be sold by the beneficiary's trustee in bankruptcy. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Adultery (from Latin adulterium, “I change or alter one lineage for another”) is extra-marital sex partaken by a spouse, or premarital sex partaken by a betrothed person, that is considered objectionable on social, religious, moral, or legal grounds. Although the sexual activities that constitute adultery vary, as well as the social, religious, and legal consequences, the concept exists in many cultures and shares some similarities in Christianity, Judaism and Islam. Adultery is viewed by many jurisdictions as offensive to public morals, undermining the marriage relationship. Historically, many cultures considered adultery a very serious crime, some subject to severe punishment, usually for the woman and sometimes for the man, with penalties including capital punishment, mutilation, or torture. Such punishments have gradually fallen into disfavor, especially in Western countries from the 19th century. In countries where adultery is still a criminal offense, punishments range from fines to caning and even capital punishment. Since the 20th century, criminal laws against adultery have become controversial, with most Western countries decriminalizing adultery. However, even in jurisdictions that have decriminalized adultery, it may still have legal consequences, particularly in jurisdictions with fault-based divorce laws, where adultery almost always constitutes a ground for divorce and may be a factor in property settlement, the custody of children, the denial of alimony, etc. Adultery is not a ground for divorce in jurisdictions which have adopted a no-fault divorce model. International organizations have called for the decriminalization of adultery, especially in the light of several high-profile stoning cases that have occurred in some countries. The head of the United Nations expert body charged with identifying ways to eliminate laws that discriminate against women or are discriminatory to them in terms of implementation or impact, Kamala Chandrakirana, has stated that: "Adultery must not be classified as a criminal offense at all". A joint statement by the United Nations Working Group on discrimination against women in law and in practice states that: "Adultery as a criminal offense violates women’s human rights". In Muslim countries that follow Sharia law for criminal justice, the punishment for adultery may be stoning. There are fifteen countries in which stoning is authorized as lawful punishment, though in recent times it has been legally carried out only in Iran and Somalia. Most countries that criminalize adultery are those where the dominant religion is Islam, and several Sub-Saharan African Christian-majority countries, but there are some notable exceptions to this rule, namely Philippines, and several U.S. states. In some jurisdictions, having sexual relations with the king's wife or the wife of his eldest son constitutes treason. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

While the board of directors is generally conferred the power to manage the day-to-day affairs of a corporation, either by the statute, or by the articles of incorporation, this is always subject to limits, including the rights that shareholders have. For example, the Delaware General Corporation Law §141(a) says the "business and affairs of every corporation ... shall be managed by or under the direction of a board of directors, except as may be otherwise provided in this chapter or in its certificate of incorporation." However, directors themselves are ultimately accountable to the general meeting through the vote. Invariably, shareholders hold the voting rights, though the extent to which these are useful can be conditioned by the constitution. The DGCL §141(k) gives an option to corporations to have a unitary board that can be removed by a majority of members "without cause" (for example a reason determined by the general meeting and not by a court), which reflects the old default common law position. However, Delaware corporations may also opt for a classified board of directors (for example where only a third of directors come up for election each year) where directors can only be removed "with cause" scrutinized by the courts. More corporations have classified boards after initial public offerings than a few years after going public, because institutional investors typically seek to change the corporation's rules to make directors more accountable. In principle, shareholders in Delaware corporations can make appointments to the board through a majority vote, and can also act to expand the size of the board and elect new directors with a majority. However, directors themselves will often control which candidates can be nominated to be appointed to the board. Under the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010, §971 empowered the Securities and Exchange Commission to write a new SEC Rule 14a-11 that would allow shareholders to propose nominations for board candidates. The Act required the SEC to evaluate the economic effects of any rules it wrote, however when it did, the Business Roundtable challenged this in court. In Business Roundtable v SEC, Ginsburg J in the DC Circuit Court of Appeals went as far to say that the SEC had "acted arbitrarily and capriciously" in its rulemaking. After this, the Securities and Exchange Commission failed to challenge the decision, and abandoned drafting new rules. This means that in many corporations, directors continue to have a monopoly on nominating future directors. Apart from elections of directors, shareholders' entitlements to vote have been significantly protected by federal regulation, either through stock exchanges or the Securities and Exchange Commission. Beginning in 1927, the New York Stock Exchange maintained a "one share, one vote" policy, which was backed by the Securities and Exchange Commission from 1940. This was thought to be necessary to halt corporations issuing non-voting shares, except to banks and other influential corporate insiders. However, in 1986, under competitive pressure from NASDAQ and AMEX, the NYSE sought to abandon the rule, and the SEC quickly drafted a new Rule 19c-4, requiring the one share, one vote principle. In Business Roundtable v SEC the DC Circuit Court of Appeals struck the rule down, through the exchanges and the SEC subsequently made an agreement to regulate shareholder voting rights "proportionately". Today, many corporations have unequal shareholder voting rights, up to a limit of ten votes per share. Stronger rights exist regarding shareholders' ability to delegate their votes to nominees, or doing "proxy voting" under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Its provisions were introduced to combat the accumulation of power by directors or management friendly voting trusts after the Wall Street Crash. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Article One of the United States Constitution establishes the legislative branch of the federal government, the United States Congress. Under Article One, Congress is a bicameral legislature consisting of the House of Representatives and the Senate.  Article One grants Congress various enumerated powers and the ability to pass laws "necessary and proper" to carry out those powers. Article One also establishes the procedures for passing a bill and places various limits on the powers of Congress and the states from abusing their powers. Article One Vesting Clause grants all federal legislative power to Congress and establishes that Congress consists of the House of Representatives and the Senate. In combination with the vesting clauses of Article Two and Article Three, the Vesting Clause of Article One establishes the separation of powers among the three branches of the federal government. Section 2 of Article One addresses the House of Representatives, establishing that members of the House are elected every two years, with congressional seats apportioned to the states on the basis of population. Section 2 includes various rules for the House of Representatives, including a provision stating that individuals qualified to vote in elections for the largest chamber of their state's legislature have the right to vote in elections for the House of Representatives. Section 3 addresses the Senate, establishing that the Senate consists of two senators from each state, with each senator serving a six-year term. Section 3 originally required that the state legislatures elect the members of the Senate, but the Seventeenth Amendment, ratified in 1913, provides for the direct election of senators. Section 3 lays out various other rules for the Senate, including a provision that establishes the vice president of the United States as the president of the Senate. Section 4 of Article One grants the states the power to regulate the congressional election process but establishes that Congress can alter those regulations or make its own regulations. Section 4 also requires Congress to assemble at least once per year. Section 5 lays out various rules for both houses of Congress and grants the House of Representatives and the Senate the power to judge their own elections, determine the qualifications of their own members, and punish or expel their own members. Section 6 establishes the compensation, privileges, and restrictions of those holding congressional office. Section 7 lays out the procedures for passing a bill, requiring both houses of Congress to pass a bill for it to become law, subject to the veto power of the president of the United States. Under Section 7, the president can veto a bill, but Congress can override the president's veto with a two-thirds vote of both chambers. Section 8 lays out the powers of Congress. (Taxes are apportioned by state population) It includes several enumerated powers, including the power to lay and collect "taxes, duties, imposts, and excises" (provided duties, imposts, and excises are uniform throughout the US), "to provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States," the power to regulate interstate and international commerce, the power to set naturalization laws, the power to coin and regulate money, the power to borrow money on the credit of the United States, the power to establish post offices and post roads, the power to establish federal courts inferior to the Supreme Court, the power to raise and support an army and a navy, the power to call forth the militia "to execute the laws of the Union, suppress insurrections, and repel invasions" and to provide for the militia's "organizing, arming, disciplining...and governing" and granting Congress the power to declare war. Section 8 also provides Congress the power to establish a federal district to serve as the national capital and gives Congress the exclusive power to administer that district. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

In law, provocation is when a person is considered to have committed a criminal act partly because of a preceding set of events that might cause a reasonable individual to lose self control. This makes them less morally culpable than if the act was premeditated (pre-planned) and done out of pure malice (malice aforethought). It "affects the quality of the actor's state of mind as an indicator of moral blameworthiness." Provocation is often a mitigating factor in sentencing. It rarely serves as a legal defense, meaning it does not stop the defendant from being guilty of the crime. It may, however, lead to a lesser punishment. In some common law legal systems, provocation is a "partial defense" for murder charges, which can result in the offense being classified as the lesser offense of manslaughter, specifically voluntary manslaughter. Provocation is distinct from self-defense in that self-defense is a legal defense, and refers to a justifiable action to protect oneself from imminent violence. Definition. If a crime is caused by provocation, it is said to be committed in the heat of passion, under an irresistible urge incited by the provoking events, and without being entirely determined by reason. "'Malice aforethought' implies a mind under the sway of reason, whereas 'passion' whilst it does not imply a dethronement of reason, is the furor brevis, which renders a man deaf to the voice of reason so that, although the act was intentional to death, it was not the result of malignity of heart, but imputable to human infirmity. Passion and malice are, therefore, inconsistent motive powers, and hence an act which proceeds from the one, cannot also proceed from the other." (Hannah v Commonwealth, Supreme Court of Virginia 1929) Establishing Provocation can reduce a murder charge to a voluntary manslaughter charge. Provocation may be defined by statutory law, by common law, or some combination. It is a possible defense for the person provoked, or a possible criminal act by the one who caused the provocation. It may be a defense by excuse or exculpation alleging a sudden or temporary loss of control (a permanent loss of control is regarded as insanity) as a response to another's provocative conduct sufficient to justify an acquittal, a mitigated sentence or a conviction for a lesser charge. Provocation can be a relevant factor in a court's assessment of a defendant's mens rea, intention, or state of mind, at the time of an act which the defendant is accused of. In common law, provocation is established by establishing events that would be "adequate" to create a heat of passion in a reasonable person, and by establishing that the heat of passion was created in the accused. The defense of provocation was first developed in English courts in the 16th and 17th centuries. During that period, a conviction of murder carried a mandatory death sentence. This inspired the need for a lesser offense. At that time, not only was it acceptable, but it was socially required that a man respond with controlled violence if his honor or dignity were insulted or threatened. It was therefore considered understandable that sometimes the violence might be excessive and end with a killing. During the 19th century, as social norms began changing, the idea that it was desirable for dignified men to respond with violence when they were insulted or ridiculed began losing traction and was replaced with the view that while those responses may not be ideal, that they were a normal human reaction resulting from a loss of self-control, and, as such, they deserved to be considered as a mitigating circumstance. During the end of the 20th century and the beginning of the 21st century, the defense of provocation, and the situations in which it should apply, have led to significant controversies, with many condemning the concept as an anachronism, arguing that it contradicts contemporary social norms where people are expected to control their behavior, even when angry. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

An interest in possession trust is a trust in which at least one beneficiary has the right to receive the income generated by the trust (if trust funds are invested) or the right to enjoy the trust assets for the present time in another way. The beneficiary with the right to enjoy the trust property for the time being is said to have an interest in possession and is colloquially described as an income beneficiary, or the life tenant. Beneficiaries of a trust have an interest in possession if they have the immediate and automatic right to receive the income arising from the trust property as it arises, or have the use and enjoyment of it, such as by living in a property owned by the trustees. Such a beneficiary is also known as an income beneficiary or life tenant. There may be more than one income beneficiary, who may have either a joint tenancy or as tenants in common. The trustee must pass all of the income received, less any trustees' expenses, to the beneficiaries. For income tax purposes, the income so accruing to the income beneficiary is taxable income of the beneficiary, and taxed accordingly, unless otherwise exempted. A beneficiary who is entitled to the income of the trust for life is known as a ‘life tenant’ or as ‘having a life interest’. A beneficiary who is entitled to the trust capital is known as the ‘remainderman’ or the ‘capital beneficiary’. A charitable trust is an irrevocable trust established for charitable purposes and, in some jurisdictions, a more specific term than "charitable organization". A charitable trust enjoys a varying degree of tax benefits in most countries. It also generates goodwill. Some important terminology in charitable trusts is the term "corpus" (Latin for "body"), which refers to the assets with which the trust is funded, and the term "donor", which is the person donating assets to a charity. A testamentary trust (sometimes referred to as a will trust or trust under will) is a trust which arises upon the death of the testator, and which is specified in their will. A will may contain more than one testamentary trust, and may address all or any portion of the estate. Testamentary trusts are distinguished from inter vivos trusts, which are created during the settlor's lifetime. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Polygyny is a significant structural factor governing divorce in countries where this is permitted. Little-to-no analysis has been completed to explicitly explain the link between marital instability and polygyny which leads to divorce. The frequency of divorce rises in polygynous marriages compared to monogamous relationships. Within polygynous unions, differences in conjugal stability are found to occur by wife order. There are 3 main mechanisms through which polygyny affects divorce: economic restraint, sexual satisfaction, and childlessness. Many women escape economic restraint through divorcing their spouses when they are allowed to initiate a divorce. Causes. In the western world as a whole, two thirds of divorces are initiated by women. In the United Sates, 69% of divorces are initiated by women and this may be due to higher sensitivity to relationship difficulties. An annual study in the UK by management consultants Grant Thornton, estimates the main proximal causes of divorce based on surveys of matrimonial lawyers. The main causes in 2004 were: Adultery; Extramarital sex; Infidelity – 27%. Domestic violence – 17%. Midlife crisis – 13%. Addictions, for example alcoholism and gambling – 6%. Workaholism – 6%. Other factors – 31%. According to this survey, husbands engaged in extramarital affairs in 75% of cases, and wives in 25%. In cases of family strain, wives' families were the primary source of strain in 78%, compared to 22% of husbands' families. Emotional and physical abuse were more evenly split, with wives affected in 60% and husbands in 40% of cases. In 70% of workaholism-related divorces it was husbands who were the cause, and in 30%, wives. The 2004 survey found that 93% of divorce cases were petitioned by wives, very few of which were contested. 53% of divorces were marriages that had lasted 10 to 15 years, with 40% ending after 5 to 10 years. The first 5 years are relatively divorce-free, and if a marriage survives more than 20 years it is unlikely to end in divorce. Social scientists study the causes of divorce in terms of underlying factors that may motivate divorce. One of these factors is the age at which a person gets married; delaying marriage may provide more opportunity or experience in choosing a compatible partner. Wage, income, and sex ratios are other such underlying factors that have been included in analyses by sociologists and economists. The elevation of divorce rates among couples who cohabited before marriage is called the "cohabitation effect". Evidence suggests that although this correlation is partly due to two forms of selection (a) that persons whose moral or religious codes permit cohabitation are also more likely to consider divorce permitted by morality or religion and (b) that marriage based on low levels of commitment is more common among couples who cohabit than among couples who do not, such that the mean and median levels of commitment at the start of marriage are lower among cohabiting than among non-cohabiting couples), the cohabitation experience itself exerts at least some independent effect on the subsequent marital union. In 2010, a study by Jay Teachman published in Journal of Marriage and Family found that women who have cohabited or had premarital sex with men other than their husbands have an increased risk of divorce and that this effect is strongest for women who have cohabited with multiple men before marriage. To Teachman, the fact that the elevated risk of divorce is only experienced when the premarital partner(s) is someone other than the husband indicates that premarital sex and cohabitation are now a normal part of the courtship process in the United States. This study only considers data on women in the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth in the United States. Divorce is sometimes caused by one of the partners finding the other unattractive. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Shareholder liability for debts. One of the basic principles of modern corporate law is that people who invest in a corporation have limited liability. For example, as a general rule shareholders can only lose the money they invested in their shares. Practically, limited liability operates only as a default rule for creditors that can adjust their risk. Banks which lend money to corporations frequently contract with a corporation's directors or shareholders to get personal guarantees, or to take security interests in their personal assets, or over a corporation's assets, to ensure their debts are paid in full. This means much of the time, shareholders are in fact liable beyond their initial investments. Similarly trade creditors, such as suppliers of raw materials, can use title retention clauses or other devices with the equivalent effect to security interests, to be paid before other creditors in bankruptcy. However, if creditors are unsecured, or for some reason guarantees and security are not enough, creditors cannot (unless there are exceptions) sue shareholders for outstanding debts. Metaphorically speaking, their liability is limited behind the "corporate veil". The same analysis, however, has been rejected by the US Supreme Court in Davis v Alexander, where a railroad subsidiary company caused injury to cattle that were being transported. As Brandeis J put it, when one "company actually controls another and operates both as a single system, the dominant company will be liable for injuries due to the negligence of the subsidiary company." There are a number of exceptions, which differ according to the law of each state, to the principle of limited liability. First, at the very least, as is recognized in public international law, courts will "pierce the corporate veil" if a corporation is being used to evade obligations in a dishonest manner. Defective organization, such as a failure to duly file the articles of incorporation with a state official, is another universally acknowledged ground. However, there is considerable diversity in state law, and controversy over how much further the law ought to go. In Kinney Shoe Corporation v Polan the Fourth Circuit Federal Court of Appeals held that it would also pierce the veil if (1) the corporation had been inadequately capitalized to meet its future obligations (2) if no corporate formalities (for example meetings and minutes) had been observed, or (3) the corporation was deliberately used to benefit an associated corporation. However, a subsequent opinion of the same court emphasized that piercing could not take place merely to prevent an abstract notion of "unfairness" or "injustice". A further, though technically different, equitable remedy is that according to the US Supreme Court in Taylor v Standard Gas Company corporate insiders (for example directors or major shareholders) who are also creditors of a company are subordinated to other creditors when the company goes bankrupt if the company is inadequately capitalized for the operations it was undertaking. Tort victims differ from commercial creditors because they have no ability to contract around limited liability, and are therefore regarded differently under most state laws. The theory developed in the mid-20th century that beyond the corporation itself, it was more appropriate for the law to recognize the economic "enterprise", which usually comprises groups of corporations, where the parent takes the benefit of a subsidiary's activities and is capable of exercising decisive influence. A concept of "enterprise liability" was developed in fields such as tax law, accounting practices, and antitrust law that were gradually received into the courts' jurisprudence. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Key concepts in bankruptcy include the debtor's discharge and the related "fresh start". Discharge is available in some but not all cases. For example, in a Chapter 7 case only an individual debtor (not a corporation, partnership, etcetera) can receive a discharge. The effect of a bankruptcy discharge is to eliminate only the debtor's personal liability, not the in rem liability for a secured debt to the extent of the value of collateral. The term "in rem" essentially means "with respect to the thing itself" (for example, the collateral). For example, if a debt in the amount of $100,000 is secured by property having a value of only $80,000, the $20,000 deficiency is treated, in bankruptcy, as an unsecured claim (even though it is part of a "secured" debt). The $80,000 portion of the debt is treated as a secured claim. Assuming a discharge is granted and none of the $20,000 deficiency is paid (for example, due to insufficiency of funds), the $20,000 deficiency—the debtor's personal liability—is discharged (assuming the debt is not non-dischargeable under another Bankruptcy Code provision). The $80,000 portion of the debt is the in rem liability, and it is not discharged by the court's discharge order. This liability can presumably be satisfied by the creditor taking the asset itself. An essential concept is that when commentators say that a debt is "dischargeable", they are referring only to the debtor's personal liability on the debt. To the extent that a liability is covered by the value of collateral, the debt is not discharged. This analysis assumes, however, that the collateral does not increase in value after commencement of the case. If the collateral increases in value and the debtor (rather than the estate) keeps the collateral (for example, where the asset is exempt or is abandoned by the trustee back to the debtor), the amount of the creditor's security interest may or may not increase. In situations where the debtor (rather than the creditor) is allowed to benefit from the increase in collateral value, the effect is called "lien stripping" or "paring down". Lien stripping is allowed only in certain cases depending on the kind of collateral and the particular chapter of the Code under which the discharge is granted. The discharge also does not eliminate certain rights of a creditor to setoff (or "offset") certain mutual debts owed by the creditor to the debtor against certain claims of that creditor against the debtor, where both the debt owed by the creditor and the claim against the debtor arose prior to the commencement of the case. Not every debt may be discharged under every chapter of the Code. Certain taxes owed to federal, state or local government, student loans, and child support obligations are not dischargeable. (Guaranteed student loans are potentially dischargeable, however, if the debtor prevails in a difficult-to-win adversary proceeding against the lender commenced by a complaint to determine dischargeability. Also, the debtor can petition the court for a financial hardship discharge, but the grant of such discharges is rare.) The debtor's liability on a secured debt, such as a mortgage or mechanic's lien on a home, may be discharged. The effects of the mortgage or mechanic's lien, however, cannot be discharged in most cases if the lien affixed prior to filing. Therefore, if the debtor wishes to retain the property, the debt must usually be paid as agreed. (See also lien avoidance, reaffirmation agreement) (Note: there may be additional flexibility available in Chapter 13 for debtors dealing with oversecured collateral such as a financed auto, so long as the oversecured property is not the debtor's primary residence.) --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Justification is a defense in a criminal case, by which a defendant who committed the acts asserts that because what they did meets certain legal standards, they are not criminally culpable for the acts which would otherwise be criminal. Justification and excuse are related but different defenses (see Justification and excuse). Justification is an exception to the prohibition of committing certain offenses. Justification can be a defense in a prosecution for a criminal offense. When an act is justified, a person is not criminally liable even though their act would otherwise constitute an offense. For example, to intentionally commit a homicide would be considered murder. However, it is not considered a crime if committed in self-defense. In addition to self-defense, the other justification defenses are defense of others, defense of property, and necessity. A justification is not the same as an excuse. In contrast, an excuse is a defense that recognizes a crime was committed, but that for the defendant, although committing a socially undesirable crime, conviction and punishment would be morally inappropriate because of an extenuating personal inadequacy, such as mental defect, lack of mental capacity, sufficient age, intense fear of death, lacking the ability to control their own conduct, etc. … Mistake (criminal law). A mistake of fact may sometimes mean that, while a person has committed the physical element of an offense, because they were laboring under a mistake of fact, they never formed the mental element. This is unlike a mistake of law, which is not usually a defense; law enforcement may or may not take for granted that individuals know what the law is. Discussion. Most criminal law systems in developed states exclude mistake of law as a defense, because allowing defendants to invoke their own ignorance of the law would breach the public policy represented by the Latin maxim: ignorantia legis neminem excusat. But someone operating under a mistake of fact will not generally be liable, because, although the defendant has committed the actus reus of the offense, the defendant may honestly believe in a set of facts that would prevent him or her from forming the requisite mens rea required to constitute the crime. For example: A defendant goes into a supermarket and places eight items in a basket which is presented to the cashier for payment in the usual way. Both honestly believe that all eight items have been scanned, and the defendant pays the sum shown on the bill. A store detective, however, notices that a mistake was made by the cashier so that only seven items were priced. This detective arrests the defendant after leaving the store. Since the defendant honestly believes that he has become the owner of goods in a sale transaction, he cannot form the mens rea for theft (which is usually dishonesty) when he physically removes them from the store. There is a complex question as to whether the defense of 'mistake' applies to crimes that do not specify a mental element – such as strict liability offenses and manslaughter by criminal negligence. In Australia, the High Court's 2005 ruling in R v Lavender prevents the use of any 'reasonable mistake of fact' defense in cases of involuntary manslaughter. However, the defense of mistake is available to offenses of strict liability such as drunk driving: see DPP v Bone (2005). And it is the very availability of the defense of 'mistake' that distinguishes between offenses of strict and absolute liability. Mistake of fact is unavailable in respect to absolute liability offenses. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

A purpose trust is a type of trust which has no beneficiaries, but instead exists for advancing some non-charitable purpose of some kind. In most jurisdictions, such trusts are not enforceable outside of certain limited and anomalous exceptions, but some countries have enacted legislation specifically to promote the use of non-charitable purpose trusts. Trusts for charitable purposes are also technically purpose trusts, but they are usually referred to simply as charitable trusts. People referring to purpose trusts are usually taken to be referring to non-charitable purpose trusts. Trusts which fail the test of charitable status usually fail as non-charitable purpose trusts, although there are certain historical exceptions to this, and some countries have modified the law in this regard by statute. The court will not usually validate non-charitable purpose trusts which fail by treating them as a power. In IRC v Broadway Cottages Trust (1955) the English Court of Appeal held: "I am not at liberty to validate this trust by treating it as a power. A valid power is not to be spelled out of an invalid trust." Conceptual objections. The basis for the general prohibition against non-charitable purpose trusts is usually phrased on one or more of several specific grounds. The beneficiary principle. A trust is, at its root, an obligation; accordingly, "every trust must have a definite object. There must be someone in whose favor the court can decree performance." With a charitable trust, this power of enforcement is usually vested in the Attorney General. However, such conceptual objections seem less strong since the decision of the House of Lords in McPhail v Doulton (1971) where Lord Wilberforce rode roughshod over objections to widening the class of valid discretionary trusts on the basis that there would be difficulty ascertaining beneficiaries for the court to enforce the trust in favor of. Where the objects of a trust are a purpose rather than an individual or individuals, there is much greater risk that a trust would not be enforceable due to lack of certainty. Cases such as Morice v Bishop of Durham (1804) and Re Astor (1952) re-affirm the court's disinclination to enforce trusts that are not specific and detailed. It is noteworthy that the common law exceptions to the general prohibition on purposes trusts tend to relate to specific and detailed matters, such as maintenance of a specific tomb, or caring for a particular animal. Excessive delegation of testamentary power. Purpose trusts have been attacked conceptually on the basis that it would amount to the delegation of a testamentary power, although subsequent cases have cast doubt on the correctness of that reasoning. Perpetuity. Charitable purpose trusts are exempt from the rule against perpetuities. Private trusts are not. Accordingly, all non-charitable purposes trusts, to be valid, need to comply with the perpetuity rules in the relevant jurisdiction. Common law exceptions. There are, nonetheless, several well recognised exceptions at common law where non-charitable purposes trusts will be upheld. Tombs and monuments. Provisions for the building or maintenance of tombs or monuments have been upheld as a matter of common law, although solely on the basis of ancient precedent. In Re Hooper (1932) a trust for the maintenance of graves was upheld, but the court indicated that it would not have done so had it not been bound by Pirbright v Salwey (1896). Such trusts still need to comply with the requirement of certainty. Hence a bequest to a Parish council for "the purpose of providing some useful memorial to myself" was struck down. Animals. Trusts for the care of specific animals have been upheld. In Re Dean (1889), North J upheld a trust for maintenance of horses and hounds for 50 years relying upon much older authorities and the monument cases. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Divorce (also known as dissolution of marriage) is the process of terminating a marriage or marital union. Divorce usually entails the canceling or reorganizing of the legal duties and responsibilities of marriage, thus dissolving the bonds of matrimony between a married couple under the rule of law of the particular country or state. It can be said to be a legal dissolution of a marriage by a court or other competent body. It is the legal process of ending a marriage. Divorce laws vary considerably around the world, but in most countries, divorce requires the sanction of a court or other authority in a legal process, which may involve issues of distribution of property, child custody, alimony (spousal support), child visitation or access, parenting time, child support, and division of debt. In most countries, monogamy is required by law, so divorce allows each former partner to marry another person. Divorce is different from annulment, which declares the marriage null and void, with legal separation or de jure separation (a legal process by which a married couple may formalize a de facto separation while remaining legally married) or with de facto separation (a process where the spouses informally stop cohabiting). Reasons for divorce vary, from sexual incompatibility or lack of independence for one or both spouses to a personality clash or infidelity. The only countries that do not allow divorce are the Philippines and the Vatican City. In the Philippines, divorce for non-Muslim Filipinos is not legal unless one spouse is an undocumented immigrant and satisfies certain conditions. The Vatican City is a state ruled by the head of the Catholic Church, a religion that does not allow for divorce. Countries that have relatively recently legalized divorce are Italy (1970), Portugal (1975, although from 1910 to 1940 it was possible both for the civil and religious marriage), Brazil (1977), Spain (1981), Argentina (1987), Paraguay (1991), Colombia (1991; from 1976 was allowed only for non-Catholics), Andorra (1995), Ireland (1996), Chile (2004) and Malta (2011). Overview. Grounds for divorce vary widely from country to country. Marriage may be seen as a contract, a status, or a combination of these. Where it is seen as a contract, the refusal or inability of one spouse to perform the obligations stipulated in the contract may constitute a ground for divorce for the other spouse. In contrast, in some countries (such as Sweden, Finland, Australia, New Zealand), divorce is purely no fault. This means it does not matter what the reasons are that a party or parties want to separate. They can separate of their own free will without having to prove someone is at fault for the divorce. Many jurisdictions offer both the option of a no fault divorce as well as an at fault divorce. This is the case, for example, in many states of the US, France and the Czech Republic. Though divorce laws vary between jurisdictions, there are two basic approaches to divorce: fault based and no-fault based. However, even in some jurisdictions that do not require a party to claim fault of their partner, a court may still take into account the behavior of the parties when dividing property, debts, evaluating custody, shared care arrangements and support. In some jurisdictions, one spouse may be forced to pay the attorney's fees of another spouse. Laws vary as to the waiting period before a divorce is effective. Also, residency requirements vary. However, issues of division of property are typically determined by the law of the jurisdiction in which the property is located. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Incorporation and charter competition. The process of starting up a new corporation is quick, though each state differs. A corporation is not the only kind of business organization that can be chosen. People may wish to register a partnership or a Limited Liability Company, depending on the precise tax status and organizational form that is sought. Most frequently, however, people running major enterprises will choose corporations which have limited liability for those who become the shareholders: if the corporation goes bankrupt the default rule is that shareholders will only lose the money they paid for their shares, even if debts to commercial creditors are still unpaid. A state office, perhaps called the "Division of Corporations" or simply the "Secretary of State", will require the people who wish to incorporate to file "articles of incorporation" (sometimes called a "charter") and pay a fee. The articles of incorporation typically record the corporation's name, if there are any limits to its powers, purposes or duration, and identify whether all shares will have the same rights. With this information filed with the state, a new corporation will come into existence, and be subject to the legal rights and duties that the people involved create on its behalf. The incorporators will also have to adopt "bylaws" which identify many more details such as the number of directors, the arrangement of the board, requirements for corporate meetings, duties of officer holders and so on. The certificate of incorporation will have identified whether the directors or the shareholders, or both have the competence to adopt and change these rules. All of this is typically achieved through the corporation's first meeting. One of the most important things that the articles of incorporation determine is the state of incorporation. Different states can have different levels of corporate tax or franchise tax, different qualities of shareholder and stakeholder rights, more or less stringent directors' duties, and so on. However, it was held by the Supreme Court in Paul v Virginia that in principle states ought to allow corporations incorporated in a different state to do business freely. This appeared to remain true even if another state (for example Delaware) required significantly worse internal protections for shareholders, employees, or creditors than the state in which the corporation operated (for example New York). So far, federal regulation has affected more issues relating to the securities markets than the balance of power and duties among directors, shareholders, employees and other stakeholders. The Supreme Court has also acknowledged that one state's laws will govern the "internal affairs" of a corporation, to prevent conflicts among state laws. So under the present law, regardless of where a corporation operates in the 50 states, the rules of the state of incorporation (subject to federal law) will govern its operation. Early in the 20th century, it was recognized by some states, initially New Jersey, that the state could cut its tax rate in order to attract more incorporations, and thus bolster tax receipts. Quickly, Delaware emerged as a preferred state of incorporation. In the 1933 case of Louis K Liggett Company v Brandeis J Lee, represented the view that the resulting "race was one not of diligence, but of laxity", particularly in terms of corporate tax rates, and rules that might protect less powerful corporate stakeholders. Over the 20th century, the problem of a "race to the bottom" was increasingly thought to justify Federal regulation of corporations. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Avoidance actions. Debtors, or the trustees that represent them, gain the ability to reject, or avoid actions taken with respect to the debtor's property for a specified time prior to the filing of the bankruptcy. While the details of avoidance actions are nuanced, there are three general categories of avoidance actions: Preferences: 11 U.S.C. § 547. Federal fraudulent transfer: 11 U.S.C. § 548. Non-bankruptcy law creditor: 11 U.S.C. § 544. All avoidance actions attempt to limit the risk of the legal system accelerating the financial demise of a financially unstable debtor who has not yet declared bankruptcy. The bankruptcy system generally endeavors to reward creditors who continue to extend financing to debtors and discourage creditors from accelerating their debt collection efforts. Avoidance actions are some of the most obvious of the mechanisms to encourage this goal. Despite the apparent simplicity of these rules, a number of exceptions exist in the context of each category of avoidance action. Preferences. Preference actions generally permit the trustee to avoid (that is, to void an otherwise legally binding transaction) certain transfers of the debtor's property that benefit creditors where the transfers occur on or within 90 days of the date of filing of the bankruptcy petition. For example, if a debtor has a debt to a friendly creditor and a debt to an unfriendly creditor, and pays the friendly creditor, and then declares bankruptcy one week later, the trustee may be able to recover the money paid to the friendly creditor under 11 U.S.C. § 547. While this "reach back" period typically extends 90 days backwards from the date of the bankruptcy, the amount of time is longer in the case of "insiders"—typically one year. Insiders include family and close business contacts of the debtor. Fraudulent transfer. Bankruptcy fraudulent transfer law is similar in practice to non-bankruptcy fraudulent transfer law. Some terms, however, are more generous in bankruptcy than they are otherwise. For instance, the statute of limitations within bankruptcy is two years as opposed to a shorter time frame in some non-bankruptcy contexts. Generally a fraudulent transfer action operates in much the same way as a preference avoidance. Fraudulent transfer actions, however, sometimes require a showing of intent to shelter the property from a creditor. Fraudulent transfer may involve an actual or a "constructive" fraud. Actual fraud is based upon the intent of the transfer, whereas constructive fraud may be inferred based upon economic factors. Factors that may lead to an inference of fraud include whether the transfer was for reasonably equivalent value and whether the debtor was insolvent at the time of the transfer. The conversion of nonexempt assets into exempt assets on the eve of bankruptcy is not an indicator of fraud per se. However, depending on the amount of the exemption and the circumstances surrounding the conversion, a court may find the conversion to be a fraudulent transfer. This is especially true when the conversion amounts to nothing more than a temporary arrangement. When finding the conversion of nonexempt into exempt assets to be a fraudulent transfer, courts tend to focus on the existence of an independent reason for the conversion. For example, if a debtor purchased a residence protected by a homestead exemption with the intent to reside in such residence that would be an allowable conversion into nonexempt property. But where the debtor purchased the residence with all of their available funds, leaving no money to live off, that presumed that the conversion was temporary, indicating a fraudulent transfer. Courts look at the timing of the transfer as the most important factor. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

In the United States, variances in the insanity defense between states, and in the federal court system, are attributable to differences with respect to three key issues: Availability: whether the jurisdiction allows a defendant to raise the insanity defense, Definition: when the defense is available, what facts will support a finding of insanity, and Burden of proof: whether the defendant has the duty of proving insanity or the prosecutor has the duty of disproving insanity, and by what standard of proof. In Foucha v Louisiana (1992) the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that a person could not be held "indefinitely" for psychiatric treatment following a finding of not guilty by reason of insanity. Availability. In the United States, a criminal defendant may plead insanity in federal court, and in the state courts of every state except for Idaho, Kansas, Montana, and Utah. However, defendants in states that disallow the insanity defense may still be able to demonstrate that a defendant was not capable of forming intent to commit a crime as a result of mental illness. In Kahler v Kansas (2020), the U.S. Supreme Court held, in a 6–3 ruling, that a state does not violate the Due Process Clause by abolishing an insanity defense based on a defendant's incapacity to distinguish right from wrong. The Court emphasized that state governments have broad discretion to choose laws defining "the precise relationship between criminal culpability and mental illness." Definition. Each state and the federal court system currently uses one of the following "tests" to define insanity for purposes of the insanity defense. Over its decades of use the definition of insanity has been modified by statute, with changes to the availability of the insanity defense, what constitutes legal insanity, whether the prosecutor or defendant has the burden of proof, the standard of proof required at trial, trial procedures, and to commitment and release procedures for defendants who have been acquitted based on a finding of insanity. M'Naghten test. The guidelines for the M'Naghten Rules, state, among other things, and evaluating the criminal responsibility for defendants claiming to be insane were settled in the British courts in the case of Daniel M'Naghten in 1843. M'Naghten was a Scottish woodcutter who killed the secretary to the prime minister, Edward Drummond, in a botched attempt to assassinate the prime minister himself. M'Naghten apparently believed that the prime minister was the architect of the myriad of personal and financial misfortunes that had befallen him. During his trial, nine witnesses testified to the fact that he was insane, and the jury acquitted him, finding him "not guilty by reason of insanity". The House of Lords asked the judges of the common law courts to answer five questions on insanity as a criminal defense, and the formulation that emerged from their review—that a defendant should not be held responsible for their actions only if, as a result of their mental disease or defect, they (1) did not know that their act would be wrong; or (2) did not understand the nature and quality of their actions—became the basis of the law governing legal responsibility in cases of insanity in England. Under the rules, loss of control because of mental illness was no defense. The M'Naghten rule was embraced with almost no modification by American courts and legislatures for more than 100 years, until the mid-20th century. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

A resulting trust is an implied trust that comes into existence by operation of law, where property is transferred to someone who pays nothing for it; and then is implied to have held the property for the benefit of another person. The trust property is said to "result" or jump back to the transferor (implied settlor). In this instance, the word 'result' means "in the result, remains with", or something similar to "revert" except that in the result the beneficial interest is held on trust for the settlor. Not all trusts whose beneficiary is also the settlor can be called resulting trusts. In common law systems, the resulting trust refers to a subset of trusts which have such outcome; express trusts which stipulate that the settlor is to be the beneficiary are not normally considered resulting trusts. Another understanding of resulting trusts could be an equitable instrument used to rectify and reverse unjust enrichment. The beneficial interest results in the settlor, or if the settlor has died the property forms part of the settlor's estate (intestacy). It remains with the person and the case of "Vandervell v Inland Reveneue Commissioners" (1967) shows that only the beneficial interest disappears but not the beneficiary interest. Closely-related parties. Some jurisdictions may establish a rebuttable presumption of gift for property transfers between relatives. The presumption may operate as an affirmative defense to a petition to establish a resulting trust implied by operation of law as it is. The law presumes that it is legitimate to transfer property to a family member, particularly for a relative's support. But an unrelated transferee who receives substantial value without consideration is ordinarily presumed to hold the property in trust for the benefit of the transferor, unless it can be proven by them that it was intended to be a gift. The rebuttable presumption of gift affects transfers between siblings, uncles, aunts, children, and grandchildren. A notable exception to the presumption of gift is the transfer of property between husband and wife (transmutations). The marital exception to presumption of gift arises from the fiduciary duty that spouses owe to one another. Spouses have a special trusted relationship that imputes an obligation of utmost good faith and fair dealing. Accordingly, spouses are deemed incapable of transmutation except under specified circumstances, such as when making an EXPRESS DECLARATION of transmutation as by clear statement in a deed or other writing of substantial dignity. Unlawful purpose. In common law jurisdictions, a resulting trust law is a creation of the law of equity, rather than of common law (in the strict sense). Accordingly, the laws of some jurisdictions might recognize equitable defenses such as laches, unclean hands, and the responsibility to do equity. For example, if a transferor transfers property for an unlawful purpose and gains a benefit, then a court might hold that he has waived his right to claim a resulting trust. In such situations, a court balances the transferee's unjust enrichment with the enablement of cheating by the transferor. Enabling a cheater to gain from his transaction would erode the legitimacy of the court. Other jurisdictions may elect to disregard an unlawful purpose. In situations involving illegality, it can become difficult to distinguish implementation of a resulting trust theory (implied by operation of law) from an oral express trust (one implied by the facts). A transferor failing upon one theory might still prevail upon the other. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

A sham marriage or fake marriage is a marriage of convenience entered into without intending to create a real marital relationship. This is usually for the purpose of gaining an advantage from the marriage. Definitions of sham marriage vary by jurisdiction, but are often related to immigration. The essential point in the varying definitions is whether the couple intend to live in a real marital relationship, to establish a life together. A typical definition by the UK Home Office in 2015: A sham marriage or civil partnership is one where the relationship is not genuine but one party hopes to gain an immigration advantage from it. There is no subsisting relationship, dependency, or intent to live as husband and wife or civil partners. While referred to as a "sham" or "fake" because of its motivation, the union itself is legally valid if it conforms to the formal legal requirements for marriage in the jurisdiction. Arranging or entering into such a marriage to deceive public officials is in itself a violation of the law of some countries, for example the US. After a period, couples often divorce if there is no purpose in remaining married. The reverse situation, in which a couple gets a divorce while continuing to live together, is called paper divorce. Marriage fraud. Sham marriages are sometimes considered distinct from a marriage fraud, which is a type of romance scam, in which one spouse is unwittingly taken advantage of by the foreign spouse who feigns romantic interest, typically in order to obtain a residence permit or for money. Background. Common reasons for sham marriages are to gain immigration, residency, work, or citizenship rights for one of the spouses. There have been cases of people entering into a sham marriage to avoid suspicion of homosexuality, bisexuality, etc. For example, Hollywood studios had allegedly requested homosexual or homoromantic actors, such as Rock Hudson, to conceal their homosexuality in a so-called lavender marriage. Fraud. Since the introduction of stricter modern immigration laws in First World countries, sham marriages have become a common method to allow a foreigner to reside, and possibly gain citizenship, in the more desirable country of the spouse. The couple marries with knowledge that the marriage is solely for the purpose of obtaining the favorable immigration status, and without intending to live as a couple. This is frequently arranged as a business transaction with payment of a sum of money, and occurs more commonly with foreigners already in the country. United States. A green card marriage is a marriage of convenience between a legal resident of the United States of America and a person who would be ineligible for residency if they were not being married to the resident. The term derives from the availability of permanent resident documents ("green cards") for spouses of legal residents in the United States, where marriage is one of the fastest and surest ways to obtain legal residence. Marriages, if legitimate, entitle the spouse to live and work in the United States, as in most other countries. In the United States, 2.3 million marriage visas were approved from 1998 through 2007, representing 25% of all green cards in 2007. Even if the non-resident spouse was previously an illegal immigrant, marriage entitles the spouse to residency. Most marriages between residents and non-residents are undertaken properly, for reasons other than or in addition to residency status. That said, the practice of obtaining residency through marriage is illegal in the United States if the marriage itself is fraudulent. A marriage that is solely for purposes of obtaining legal residence is considered a sham, and is a crime in the United States for both participants. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

United States corporate law regulates the governance, finance and power of corporations in US law. Every state and territory has its own basic corporate code, while federal law creates minimum standards for trade in company shares and governance rights, found mostly in the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended by laws like the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002 and the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The US Constitution was interpreted by the US Supreme Court to allow corporations to incorporate in the state of their choice, regardless of where their headquarters are. Over the 20th century, most major corporations incorporated under the Delaware General Corporation Law, which offered lower corporate taxes, fewer shareholder rights against directors, and developed a specialized court and legal profession. Nevada has attempted to do the same. Twenty-four states follow the Model Business Corporation Act, while New York and California are important due to their size. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

bankruptcy. In the United States, bankruptcy is largely governed by federal law, commonly referred to as the "Bankruptcy Code" ("Code"). The United States Constitution (Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4) authorizes Congress to enact "uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States". Congress has exercised this authority several times since 1801, including through adoption of the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978, as amended, codified in Title 11 of the United States Code and the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005. Some laws relevant to bankruptcy are found in other parts of the United States Code. For example, bankruptcy crimes are found in Title 18 of the United States Code (Crimes). Tax implications of bankruptcy are found in Title 26 of the United States Code (Internal Revenue Code), and the creation and jurisdiction of bankruptcy courts are found in Title 28 of the United States Code (Judiciary and Judicial procedure). Bankruptcy cases are filed in United States bankruptcy court (units of the United States District Courts), and federal law governs procedure in bankruptcy cases. However, state laws are often applied to determine how bankruptcy affects the property rights of debtors. For example, laws governing the validity of liens or rules protecting certain property from creditors (known as exemptions), may derive from state law or federal law. Because state law plays a major role in many bankruptcy cases, it is often unwise to generalize some bankruptcy issues across state lines. History. Originally, bankruptcy in the United States, as nearly all matters directly concerning individual citizens, was a subject of state law. However, there were several short-lived federal bankruptcy laws before the Act of 1898: the Bankruptcy Act of 1800, which was repealed in 1803; the Act of 1841, which was repealed in 1843; and the Act of 1867, which was amended in 1874 and repealed in 1878. The first more lasting federal bankruptcy law, sometimes called the "Nelson Act", initially entered into force in 1898. The current Bankruptcy Code was enacted in 1978 by § 101 of the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978, and generally became effective on October 1, 1979; it completely replaced the former bankruptcy law, the "Chandler Act" of 1938, which had given unprecedented power to the Securities and Exchange Commission for the regulation of bankruptcy filings. The current code has been amended numerous times since 1978. See also the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005. Chapters of the Bankruptcy Code. Entities seeking relief under the Bankruptcy Code may file a petition for relief under a number of different chapters of the Code, depending on circumstances. Title 11 contains nine chapters, six of which provide for the filing of a petition. The other three chapters provide rules governing bankruptcy cases in general. A case is typically referred to by the chapter under which the petition is filed. These chapters are described below. Chapter 7: Liquidation. Liquidation under a Chapter 7 filing is the most common form of bankruptcy. Liquidation involves the appointment of a trustee who collects the non-exempt property of the debtor, sells it and distributes the proceeds to the creditors. Because all states allow for debtors to keep essential property, Chapter 7 cases are often "no asset" cases, meaning that the bankrupt estate has no non-exempt assets to fund a distribution to creditors. Chapter 7 bankruptcy remains on a bankruptcy filer's credit report for 10 years. United States bankruptcy law significantly changed in 2005 with the passage of Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act (US) —- BAPCPA, which made it more difficult for consumer debtors to file bankruptcy in general and Chapter 7 in particular. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

The insanity defense, also known as the mental disorder defense, is an affirmative defense by excuse in a criminal case, arguing that the defendant is not responsible for their actions due to a psychiatric disease at the time of the criminal act. This is contrasted with an excuse of provocation, in which the defendant is responsible, but the responsibility is lessened due to a temporary mental state. It is also contrasted with the justification of self-defense or with the mitigation of imperfect self-defense. The insanity defense is also contrasted with a finding that a defendant cannot stand trial in a criminal case because a mental disease prevents them from effectively assisting counsel, from a civil finding in trusts and estates where a will is nullified because it was made when a mental disorder prevented a testator from recognizing the natural objects of their bounty, and from involuntary civil commitment to a mental institution, when anyone is found to be gravely disabled or to be a danger to themself or to others. Exemption from full criminal punishment on such ground's dates back to at least the Code of Hammurabi. Legal definitions of insanity or mental disorder are varied, and include the M'Naghten Rule, the Durham rule, the 1953 British Royal Commission on Capital Punishment report, the ALI rule (American Legal Institute Model Penal Code rule), and other provisions, often relating to a lack of mens rea ("guilty mind").  In the criminal laws of Australia and Canada, statutory legislation enshrines the M'Naghten Rules, with the terms defense of mental disorder, defense of mental illness or not criminally responsible by reason of mental disorder employed. Being incapable of distinguishing right from wrong is one basis for being found to be legally insane as a criminal defense. It originated in the M'Naghten Rule, and has been reinterpreted and modernized through more recent cases, such as People v Serravo. In the United Kingdom, Ireland, and the United States, use of the defense is rare. Mitigating factors, including things not eligible for the insanity defense such as intoxication and partial defenses such as diminished capacity and provocation, are used more frequently. The defense is based on evaluations by forensic mental health professionals with the appropriate test according to the jurisdiction. Their testimony guides the jury, but they are not allowed to testify to the accused's criminal responsibility, as this is a matter for the jury to decide. Similarly, mental health practitioners are restrained from making a judgment on the "ultimate issue"—whether the defendant is insane. Some jurisdictions require the evaluation to address the defendant's ability to control their behavior at the time of the offense (the volitional limb). A defendant claiming the defense is pleading "not guilty by reason of insanity" (NGRI) or "guilty but insane or mentally ill" in some jurisdictions which, if successful, may result in the defendant being committed to a psychiatric facility for an indeterminate period. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Presumptive resulting trusts. These are transfers made by A to B, where the law creates a rebuttable presumption of a resulting trust applying if the intention is not made clear by A. (written evidence produced). For example, when A transfers property to B, unless the transfer was made by father to child or by husband to wife, in the absence of any other evidence the law presumes that a resulting trust has been created for A.(Y this category excluded: for example:A evidence cannot stand in Course of testimony & remains Hearsay)(A will not get the property if H&W & F&C can adduce evidence it is their property and resulting trust will not arise. The main categories of fact situations giving rise to a presumption of a resulting trust are: - Where A makes a voluntary conveyance of property to B - Where A has made a monetary contribution to the purchase of property for B. From these cases it can be stated that where there is a voluntary transfer of property, the law presumes the recipient holds that property on resulting trust, until the property is transferred back to the original owner, unless the recipient can show a gift was intended. The presumptions are, however, easily rebutted. In Fowkes v Pascoe, evidence was shown that a woman had purchased stock in the names of herself and her grandson; evidence by the grandson and granddaughter-in-law that this had been done as a gift was admissible. On the other hand, the presumption is solely concerned with evidence of an intent to create a trust; ulterior motives to create a trust are not taken into account. In Tinsley v Milligan, a woman transferred property to her business partner on trust in order to fraudulently claim social security payments; it was held that this did not defeat the presumption of a resulting trust. The fact that is being proved by the presumption of a resulting trust is the intention to create a trust for the settlor. This view of presumed resulting trusts has been endorsed by Lord Browne-Wilkinson in Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v Islington LBC); "...the presumption of resulting trust is rebutted by evidence of any intention inconsistent with such a trust, not only by evidence of an intention to make a gift." Some have argued that this presumption arises as a result of a lack of intention to transfer any beneficial interest. This view has generally not received judicial endorsement. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

A marriage license is a document issued, either by a religious organization or state authority, authorizing a couple to marry. The procedure for obtaining a license varies between jurisdictions, and has changed over time. Marriage licenses began to be issued in the Middle Ages, to permit a marriage which would otherwise be illegal (for instance, if the necessary period of notice for the marriage had not been given). Today, they are a legal requirement in some jurisdictions and may also serve as the record of the marriage itself, if signed by the couple and witnessed. In other jurisdictions, a license is not required. In some jurisdictions, a "pardon" can be obtained for marrying without a license, and in some jurisdictions, common-law marriages and marriage by cohabitation and representation are also recognized. These do not require a marriage license. There are also some jurisdictions where marriage licenses do not exist at all and a marriage certificate is given to the couple after the marriage ceremony has taken place. History. For most of Western history, marriage was a private contract between two families. Until the 16th century, Christian churches accepted the validity of a marriage on the basis of a couple's declarations. If two people claimed that they had exchanged marital vows, even without witnesses, the Catholic Church accepted that they were validly married. Some states in the US hold that public cohabitation can be sufficient evidence of a valid marriage. Marriage license application records from government authorities are widely available starting from the mid-19th century. Some are available dating from the 17th century in colonial America. Marriage licenses have been required since 1639 in Massachusetts, with their use gradually expanding to other jurisdictions. United States. In the United States, until the mid-19th century, common-law marriages were recognized as valid, but thereafter some states began to invalidate common-law marriages. Common-law marriages, if recognized by law, are valid, notwithstanding the absence of a marriage license; this becomes an issue in the settlement of decedents' estates. North Carolina and Tennessee (which was originally western North Carolina) never recognized marriage at the common law as valid without a license unless entered into in other states. They have always recognized otherwise valid marriages (except bigamous, polygamous, interracial, or same-sex) entered into in conformity with the law of other states, territories and nations. The specifications for obtaining a marriage license vary between states. In general, however, both parties must appear in person at the time the license is obtained; be of marriageable age (for example, over 18 years; lower in some states with the consent of a parent); present proper identification (typically a driver's license, state ID card, birth certificate or passport; more documentation may be required for those born outside of the United States); and neither must be married to anyone else (proof of spouse's death or divorce may be required for someone who had been previously married in some states). The US states of Louisiana, Florida, Connecticut, Wisconsin, Indiana, Oklahoma, Massachusetts, Mississippi, California, New York, and the District of Columbia once required blood tests before issuing a marriage license, but such requirements have since been abolished. The tests were mainly used to check for previous or current bouts of syphilis and rubella (German measles); other diseases that have been screened for before marriage in some cases have included tuberculosis, gonorrhea, and HIV, the last of which is the only one of those three that is detectable using a blood test. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Fair dealing is a limitation and exception to the exclusive rights granted by copyright law to the author of a creative work. Fair dealing is found in many of the common law jurisdictions of the Commonwealth of Nations. Fair dealing is an enumerated set of possible defenses against an action for infringement of an exclusive right of copyright. Unlike the related United States doctrine of fair use, fair dealing cannot apply to any act which does not fall within one of these categories, although common law courts in some jurisdictions are less stringent than others in this regard. In practice, however, such courts might rule that actions with a commercial character, which might be naïvely assumed to fall into one of these categories, were in fact infringements of copyright, as fair dealing is not as flexible a concept as the American concept of fair use. There are similar limitations and exceptions to copyright, such as the right to quote, also in the Berne Convention and in the laws of civil law jurisdictions. By country. United States. The parallel concept in United States copyright law is fair use. The term "fair dealing" has a different meaning in the U.S. It is a duty of full disclosure imposed upon corporate officers, fiduciaries, and parties to contracts. In the reported cases, it usually arises in the context of the "implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing", which underlies the tort cause of action for insurance bad faith. Canada. The Canadian concept of fair dealing is similar to that in the UK and Australia. The fair dealing clauses of the Canadian Copyright Act allow users to engage in certain activities relating to research, private study, education, parody, satire, criticism, review, or news reporting. With respect to criticism, review, and news reporting, the user must mention the source of the material, along with the name of the author, performer, maker, or broadcaster for the dealing to be fair. Prior to 2011, fair dealing in Canada was not definitely found to contain exceptions for parody (unlike fair use in the United States), but the Copyright Act has since been amended to include parody and satire (along with educational use) under its fair dealing provisions. Previously, a Quebec Court of Appeal in Les productions Avanti Cine Video v Favreau (4 August 1999) had recognized that parody could potentially be a 'critique', but it refused to recognize the exception in that circumstance. The 2004 ruling by the Supreme Court of Canada in CCH Canadian Limited v Law Society of Upper Canada has gone far in clarifying the concept of fair dealing in Canada. In considering fair dealing the Court makes the following general observation: It is important to clarify some general considerations about exceptions to copyright infringement. Procedurally, a defendant is required to prove that his or her dealing with a work has been fair; however, the fair dealing exception is perhaps more properly understood as an integral part of the Copyright Act than simply a defense. Any act falling within the fair dealing exception will not be an infringement of copyright. The fair dealing exception, like other exceptions in the Copyright Act, is a user's right. In order to maintain the proper balance between the rights of a copyright owner and users' interests, it must not be interpreted restrictively. Furthermore, by taking "a liberal approach to the enumerated purposes of the dealing", the Court has made fair dealing more flexible, reducing the gap between this provision and US fair use. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Subrogation is the assumption by a third party (such as a second creditor or an insurance company) of another party's legal right to collect debts or damages. It is a legal doctrine whereby one person is entitled to enforce the subsisting or revived rights of another for one's own benefit. A right of subrogation typically arises by operation of law, but can also arise by statute or by agreement. Subrogation is an equitable remedy, having first developed in the English Court of Chancery. It is a familiar feature of common law systems. Analogous doctrines exist in civil law jurisdictions. Subrogation is a relatively specialized field of law; entire legal textbooks are devoted to the subject. Doctrine. Countries which have inherited the common law system will typically have a doctrine of subrogation, but its doctrinal basis in a particular jurisdiction may vary from that in other jurisdictions, depending upon the extent to which equity remains a distinct body of law in that jurisdiction. English courts have now accepted that the concept of unjust enrichment has a role to play in subrogation. In contrast, this approach has been stridently rejected by the High Court of Australia, where the doctrinal basis of subrogation is said to lie in the prevention of unconscionable results: for example, the discharge of a debtor or one party getting double recovery. Types. The situations in which subrogation will be available are not closed and vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Subrogation typically arises in three-party situations. Some common examples of subrogation include: Indemnity insurance. An indemnity insurer may be entitled to be subrogated to the rights of insured as against a third party who is responsible for the damage to the insured. Law of guarantees. A surety may be entitled to be subrogated to the rights of the creditor as against the principal debtor. Trust creditors. A creditor of a trustee may be entitled to be subrogated to the trustee's right of indemnity. Subrogation to outgoing securities. A lender who advances funds for the purpose of discharging a security may be entitled to be subrogated to the third party's security as against the borrower. Bills of exchange. The indorser of a bill of exchange may be entitled to be subrogated to the holder as against the acceptor (who is liable to indemnify the indorser). Indemnity insurer's subrogation rights. "Subrogation" has been used in this context to refer to two distinct situations. First, after paying out under a policy of indemnity insurance, an insurer may be entitled to stand in the shoes of the insured and enforce the insured's rights against the third-party tortfeasor who is responsible for the loss. This is subrogation in its proper or core sense. Insurance subrogation, and, specifically, the types and amounts of payments that can be recovered, differs from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Secondly, after paying out under a policy of indemnity insurance, an insurer may be entitled to sue the insured where the insured has already had his loss made good by the third-party tortfeasor. That is, the insurer has a claim against the insured so as to ensure that the insured does not get double recovery. This situation might arise if, for example, an insured claimed in full under the policy, but then started proceedings against the third-party tortfeasor, and recovered substantial damages. Strictly speaking, this is not a case of subrogation; it is a case of recoupment. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

In law, ignorantia juris non excusat (Latin for "ignorance of the law excuses not"), or ignorantia legis neminem excusat ("ignorance of law excuses no one"), is a legal principle holding that a person who is unaware of a law may not escape liability for violating that law merely by being unaware of its content. European-law countries with a tradition of Roman law may also use an expression from Aristotle translated into Latin: nemo censetur ignorare legem ("nobody is thought to be ignorant of the law") or ignorantia iuris nocet ("not knowing the law is harmful"). Explanation. The rationale of the doctrine is that if ignorance were an excuse, a person charged with criminal offenses or a subject of a civil lawsuit would merely claim that one was unaware of the law in question to avoid liability, even if that person really does know what the law in question is. Thus, the law imputes knowledge of all laws to all persons within the jurisdiction no matter how transiently. Even though it would be impossible, even for someone with substantial legal training, to be aware of every law in operation in every aspect of a state's activities, this is the price paid to ensure that willful blindness cannot become the basis of exculpation. Thus, it is well settled that persons engaged in any undertakings outside what is common for a normal person will make themselves aware of the laws necessary to engage in that undertaking. If they do not, they cannot complain if they incur liability. The doctrine assumes that the law in question has been properly promulgated—published and distributed, for example, by being printed in a government gazette, made available over the Internet, or printed in volumes available for sale to the public at affordable prices. In the ancient phrase of Gratian, Leges instituuntur cum promulgantur ("Laws are instituted when they are promulgated"). In order that a law obtain the binding force which is proper to a law, it must be applied to the men who have to be ruled by it. Such application is made by their being given notice by promulgation. A law can bind only when it is reasonably possible for those to whom it applies to acquire knowledge of it in order to observe it, even if actual knowledge of the law is absent for a particular individual. A secret law is no law at all. In criminal law, although ignorance may not clear a defendant of guilt, it can be a consideration in sentencing, particularly where the law is unclear or the defendant sought advice from law enforcement or regulatory officials. For example, in one Canadian case, a person was charged with being in possession of gambling devices after they had been advised by customs officials that it was legal to import such devices into Canada. Although the defendant was convicted, the sentence was an absolute discharge. In addition, there were, particularly in the days before satellite communication and cellular phones, persons who could genuinely be ignorant of the law due to distance or isolation. For example, in a case in British Columbia, four hunters were acquitted of game offenses where the law was changed during the period they were in the wilderness hunting. Another case, in early English law, involved a seaman on a clipper before the invention of radio who had shot another. Although he was found guilty, he was pardoned, as the law had been changed while he was at sea. Although ignorance of the law, like other mistakes of law, is not a defence, a mistake of fact may well be, depending on the circumstances: that is, the false but sincerely held belief in a factual state of affairs which, had it been the case, would have made the conduct innocent in law. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

An express trust is a trust created "in express terms, and usually in writing, as distinguished from one inferred by the law from the conduct or dealings of the parties." Property is transferred by a person (called a trustor, settlor, or grantor) to a transferee (called the trustee), who holds the property for the benefit of one or more persons, called beneficiaries. The trustee may distribute the property, or the income from that property, to the beneficiaries. Express trusts are frequently used in common law jurisdictions as methods of wealth preservation or enhancement. Terms. Law generally requires only a simple formality to create an express trust. In certain jurisdictions, an express trust may even be established orally. Typically, a settlor would record the disposition, where real property is to be held in trust or the value of property in trust is large. Where legal title to property is being passed to a trustee, a "deed of settlement" or "Trust Instrument" (for jurisdictions that do not recognise Deeds) may be used. Where property is to continue to be held by the person making the trust, a "declaration of trust" will be appropriate. Often, a trust corporation or more than one trustee is appointed to allow for uninterrupted administration of the trust in the event of a trustee's resignation, death, bankruptcy or incapacity. Additionally a Protector may be appointed who, for example, is authorized to appoint new trustees and to review the trustees' annual accounts. To be valid at common law, a trust instrument must ascertain its beneficiaries, as well as the res (a Latin term meaning "thing") or subject matter of the trust, unless it is a charitable trust which does not provide specific beneficiaries. To be valid in equity, a trust must satisfy the following elements: 1. Property or rights of a kind which can be the subject of a trust 2. A declaration of trust or disposition on trust by a person legally competent to create a trust 3. Certainty of property and objects (trust must be administratively workable 4. Compliance with requirements regarding evidence 5. Compliance with rule against remoteness of vesting (rule against perpetuities and rule against inalienability of income for longer than the perpetuity period) Common forms of express trust. Bare trust. property transferred to another to hold for example for a third person absolutely. May be of use where property is to be held and invested on behalf of a minor child or mentally incapacitated person. Life Interest trust. the income from property transferred is paid to one person, "the life tenant" (for example a widower), during their lifetime and thereafter is transferred to another person (who may take absolutely or a second life interest according to the terms of the trust, in the second case a third beneficiary would come into play). The trustees may have power to pay capital as well as income to the life tenant. Alternatively, they may have rights to transfer ("appoint") property to other beneficiaries ahead of their entitlement. Discretionary trust. the trustees may pay out income to whichever of the beneficiaries they, in the reasonable exercise of their discretion, think fit. They will normally also have the power to pay out capital. They may have extensive powers, even to add new beneficiaries, but such powers may normally only be exercised bona fide in the interests of the beneficiaries as a whole. Discretionary trusts must not be indefinite and are subject to 'the rule against perpetuities'. In New South Wales, the time prescribed is a statutory period of 80 years from the date the disposition takes effect. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Marriage is an institution that is historically filled with restrictions. From age, to gender, to social status, various restrictions are placed on marriage by communities, religious institutions, legal traditions and states. Marriage age. The minimum age at which a person is able to lawfully marry, and whether parental or other consents are required, vary from country to country. In the U.S. the minimum age for marriage without parental and or judicial approval is 18 except for Nebraska (19) and Mississippi (21); but most states allow exceptions to the general minimum age in some circumstances (see Marriage age in the United States). In England and Wales the general age at which a person may marry is 18, but 16- or 17-year-olds may get married with their parents' or guardians' consent. If they are unable to obtain this, they can gain consent from the courts, which may be granted by the Magistrates' Courts, or the county or High Court family divisions. Gender restrictions. Legal, social, and religious restrictions apply in all countries on the genders of the couple. In response to changing social and political attitudes, some jurisdictions and religious denominations now recognize marriages between people of the same sex. Other jurisdictions have instead "civil unions" or "domestic partnerships", while additional others explicitly prohibit same-sex marriages. In 1989, Denmark became the first country to legally recognize a relationship for same-sex couples, establishing registered partnerships, which gave those in same-sex relationships "most rights of married heterosexuals, but not the right to adopt or obtain joint custody of a child". In 2001, the Netherlands became the first country in the world to legalize same-sex marriage. As of date, marriage between same-sex couples is legally performed and recognized in 34 countries, namely the Netherlands, Belgium, Spain, Canada, South Africa, Norway, Sweden, Portugal, Iceland, Argentina, Denmark, Brazil, France, Uruguay, New Zealand, Luxembourg, the United States, Ireland, Colombia, Finland, Malta, Germany, Australia, Austria, Taiwan, Ecuador, United Kingdom, Costa Rica, Chile, Switzerland, Slovenia, Cuba, Mexico and Andorra. Civil union, civil partnership, domestic partnership and registered partnership statuses offer varying legal benefits of marriage. As of 5 June 2023, countries that have an alternative form of legal recognition other than marriage on a national level are: Bolivia, Croatia, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Liechtenstein, Monaco, Montenegro and San Marino. Further religious conflicts. These developments have created a political and religious reaction in some countries, including in England, where the Church of England, after long debate, officially banned blessings of gay couples by Church of England clergy, and in the United States, which continues to experience conflicts, based upon religious grounds. Kinship restrictions. Kinship is two people that are related by blood or adoption, such as brother, sister, mother, father, aunt, uncle etcetera. No European country prohibits marriage between first cousins. The U.S. is the only western country with cousin marriage restrictions. Societies have often placed restrictions on marriage to relatives, though the degree of prohibited relationship varies widely. In most societies, marriage between brothers and sisters has been forbidden, with ancient Egyptian, Hawaiian, and Inca royalty being prominent exceptions. In many societies, marriage between first cousins is preferred, while at the other extreme, the medieval Catholic Church prohibited marriage even between distant cousins. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

The idea–expression distinction or idea–expression dichotomy is a legal doctrine in the United States that limits the scope of copyright protection by differentiating an idea from the expression or manifestation of that idea. Unlike patents, which may confer proprietary rights in relation to general ideas and concepts per se when construed as methods, copyrights cannot confer such rights. An adventure novel provides an illustration of the concept. Copyright may subsist in the work as a whole, in the particular story or characters involved, or in any artwork contained in the book, but generally not in the idea or genre of the story. Copyright, therefore, may not subsist in the idea of a man venturing out on a quest, but may subsist in a particular story that follows that pattern. Similarly, if the methods or processes described in a work are patentable, they may be the subject of various patent claims, which may or may not be broad enough to cover other methods or processes based on the same idea. Arthur C Clarke, for example, sufficiently described the concept of a communications satellite (a geostationary satellite used as a telecommunications relay) in a 1945 paper that was not considered patentable in 1954 when it was developed at Bell Labs. Legal origins and status. Philosophically, there is disagreement about the distinction between thought and language. In the past it was often thought that the two could not be separated, and so a paraphrase could never exactly reproduce a thought expressed in different words. At the opposite extreme is the view that concepts and language are completely independent, so there is always a range of ways in which a concept can be expressed. In the United States, the doctrine originated from the 1879 Supreme Court case of Baker v Selden. The Supreme Court held in Selden that, while exclusive rights to the "useful arts" (in this case bookkeeping) described in a book might be available by patent, only the description itself was protectable by copyright. In later cases, the Supreme Court has stated that "unlike a patent, a copyright gives no exclusive right to the art disclosed; protection is given only to the expression of the idea—not the idea itself," and that "copyright's idea or expression dichotomy 'strike a definitional balance between the First Amendment and the Copyright Act by permitting free communication of facts while still protecting an author's expression.'" In the English decision of Donoghue v Allied Newspapers Limited (1938) Ch 106, the court illustrated the concept by stating that "the person who has clothed the idea in form, whether by means of a picture, a play or a book" owns the copyright. In the Australian decision of Victoria Park Racing and Recreation Grounds Company Limited v Taylor (1937), Latham CJ used the analogy of reporting a person's fall from a bus: the first person to do so could not use the law of copyright to stop other people from announcing this fact. Today, Article 1.2 of the European Union Software Directive expressly excludes from copyright ideas and principles that underlie any element of a computer program, including those that underlie its interfaces. As stated by the European Court of Justice in SAS Institute Inc v World Programming Limited, "to accept that the functionality of a computer program can be protected by copyright would amount to making it possible to monopolize ideas, to the detriment of technological progress and industrial development." Scènes à faire. Some courts have recognized that particular ideas can be expressed effectively only by using certain elements or background. The French name for this doctrine is Scènes à faire. Therefore, even the expression in these circumstances is unprotected, or extremely limited to verbatim copying only. This is true in the United Kingdom and most Commonwealth countries. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

In contract law, rescission is an equitable remedy which allows a contractual party to cancel the contract. Parties may rescind if they are the victims of a vitiating factor, such as misrepresentation, mistake, duress, or undue influence. Rescission is the unwinding of a transaction. This is done to bring the parties, as far as possible, back to the position in which they were before they entered into a contract (the status quo ante). Taxonomy. Rescission is used throughout the law in a number of different senses. The failure to draw these crucial distinctions is productive of serious confusion. Although Judicature legislation has been enacted throughout the common law world, and jurisdictions vary in their recognition of a distinct body of law known as equity, reference to the jurisdictional origins is still important for the purposes of exposition. "Rescission" in the sense of termination. Rescission in this sense is not the focus of this article. Where a contract is terminated, obligations under the contract are only discharged prospectively; the contract is not rendered void ab initio. Rescission in the sense of termination covers two key situations: First, where a party to a contract exercises an express right of termination, he or she is sometimes said to have exercised a right to rescind the contract. Secondly, where a party is faced with a repudiation, the party can elect to terminate the contract; this too has often been referred to as an election to rescind. "Rescission" at common law. Rescission at common law (as distinct from rescission in equity) is a self-help remedy: historically, the common law courts simply gave effect to the rescinding party's unequivocal election to rescind the contract. Rescission at common law is only available for fraudulent misrepresentations and duress. Rescission renders the contract void ab initio, and courts will only grant rescission under common law if the parties can be restored to their original positions prior to the formation of the contract ("restitutio in integrum"). Courts of Equity exercised a jurisdiction to effect rescission where restoring the parties to the contract to their pre-contract positions was not possible at common law. "Rescission" in equity. Rescission is available in equity's exclusive jurisdiction in a wide range of situations. For example, where there has been an innocent but material misrepresentation, a breach of fiduciary duty, unconscionable conduct, or equitable fraud. In court. Rescission is an equitable remedy and is discretionary. It is used as a synonym for termination at law. A court may decline to rescind a contract if one party has affirmed the contract by his action, or a third party has acquired some rights or there has been substantial performance in implementing the contract. To improve chances of being granted rescission, parties may do well to describe those circumstances which may give rise to an entitlement to terminate, as was done in Koompahtoo Local Aboriginal Land Council v Sanpine Pty Ltd. Furthermore, because rescission is supposed to be imposed mutually upon both sides to a contract, the party seeking rescission normally must offer to give back all benefits he or she has received under the contract (an "offer of tender"). The US state of Virginia uses the term "cancellation" for equitable rescission. Furthermore, a minority of common law jurisdictions, like South Africa, use the term "rescission" for what other jurisdictions call "reversing", "overturning" or "overruling" a court judgment. In this sense, the term means to be set aside or made void, on application to the court that granted the judgment or to a higher court. Applications to rescind a judgment are usually made on the basis of error or for good cause. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Entrapment is a practice in which a law enforcement agent or agent of the state induces a person to commit a "crime" that the person would have otherwise been unlikely or unwilling to commit. It "is the conception and planning of an offense by an officer or agent, and the procurement of its commission by one who would not have perpetrated it except for the trickery, persuasion or fraud of the officer or state agent". Police conduct rising to the level of entrapment is broadly discouraged and thus, in many jurisdictions, is available as a defense against criminal liability. Sting operations, through which police officers or agents engage in deception to try to catch persons who are committing crimes, raise concerns about possible entrapment. Depending on the law in the jurisdiction, the prosecution may be required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was not entrapped or the defendant may be required to prove that they were entrapped as an affirmative defense. In the practice of journalism and whistle-blowing entrapment means "deceptive and trust-breaking techniques ... applied to trick someone to commit a legal or moral transgression." United States. In the United States, two competing tests exist for determining whether entrapment has taken place, known as the "subjective" and "objective" tests. The "subjective" test looks at the defendant's state of mind; entrapment can be claimed if the defendant had no "predisposition" to commit the crime. The "objective" test looks instead at the government's conduct; entrapment occurs when the actions of government officers would usually have caused a normally law-abiding person to commit a crime. Contrary to popular belief, the United States does not require police officers to identify themselves as police in the case of a sting or other undercover work, and police officers may lie when engaged in such work. The law of entrapment instead focuses on whether people were enticed to commit crimes they would not have otherwise considered in the normal course of events. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Land trust: A private, nonprofit organization that, as all or part of its mission, actively works to conserve land by undertaking or assisting in land or conservation easement acquisition, or by its stewardship of such land or easements; or an agreement whereby one party (the trustee) agrees to hold ownership of a piece of real property for the benefit of another party (the beneficiary). Offshore trust: Strictly speaking, an offshore trust is a trust which is resident in any jurisdiction other than that in which the settlor is resident. However, the term is more commonly used to describe a trust in one of the jurisdictions known as offshore financial centers or, colloquially, as tax havens. Offshore trusts are usually conceptually similar to onshore trusts in common law countries, but usually with legislative modifications to make them more commercially attractive by abolishing or modifying certain common law restrictions. By extension, "onshore trust" has come to mean any trust resident in a high-tax jurisdiction. Personal injury trust: A personal injury trust is any form of trust where funds are held by trustees for the benefit of a person who has suffered an injury and funded exclusively by funds derived from payments made in consequence of that injury. Private and public trusts: A private trust has one or more particular individuals as its beneficiary. By contrast, a public trust (also called a charitable trust) has some charitable end as its beneficiary. To qualify as a charitable trust, the trust must have as its object certain purposes such as alleviating poverty, providing education, carrying out some religious purpose, etc. The permissible objects are generally set out in legislation, but objects not explicitly set out may also be an object of a charitable trust, by analogy. Charitable trusts are entitled to special treatment under the law of trusts and also the law of taxation. Protective trust: Here the terminology is different between the UK and the USA: In the UK, a protective trust is a life interest that terminates upon the happening of a specified event; such as the bankruptcy of the beneficiary, or any attempt by an individual to dispose of their interest. They have become comparatively rare. In the US, a 'protective trust' is a type of trust that was devised for use in estate planning. (In another jurisdiction this might be thought of as one type of asset protection trust.) Often a person, A, wishes to leave property to another person B. A, however, fears that the property might be claimed by creditors before A dies, and that therefore B would receive none of it. A could establish a trust with B as the beneficiary, but then A would not be entitled to use of the property before they died. Protective trusts were developed as a solution to this situation. A would establish a trust with both A and B as beneficiaries, with the trustee instructed to allow A use of the property until they died, and thereafter to allow its use to B. The property is then safe from being claimed by A's creditors, at least so long as the debt was entered into after the trust's establishment. This use of trusts is similar to life estates and remainders, and is frequently used as an alternative to them. Purpose trust: Or, more accurately, non-charitable purpose trust (all charitable trusts are purpose trusts). Generally, the law does not permit non-charitable purpose trusts outside of certain anomalous exceptions which arose under the eighteenth-century common law (and, arguably, Quistclose trusts). Certain jurisdictions (principally, offshore jurisdictions) have enacted legislation validating non-charitable purpose trusts generally. QTIP Trust: Short for "qualified terminal interest property". A trust recognized under the tax laws of the United States which qualifies for the marital gift exclusion from the estate tax. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

A domestic partnership is a relationship, usually between couples, who live together and share a common domestic life, but are not married (to each other or to anyone else). People in domestic partnerships receive legal benefits that guarantee the right of survivorship, hospital visitation, and other rights. The term is not used consistently, which results in some inter-jurisdictional confusion. Some jurisdictions, such as Australia, New Zealand, and the U.S. states of California, Maine, Nevada, Oregon and Washington use the term "domestic partnership" to mean what other jurisdictions call civil union, civil partnership, or registered partnership. Other jurisdictions use the term as it was originally coined, to mean an interpersonal status created by local municipal and county governments, which provides an extremely limited range of rights and responsibilities. Some legislatures have voluntarily established domestic partnership relations by statute instead of being ordered to do so by a court. Although some jurisdictions have instituted domestic partnerships as a way to recognize same-sex marriage, statutes do exist which provide for recognition of opposite-sex domestic partnerships in many jurisdictions. In some legal jurisdictions, domestic partners who live together for an extended period of time but are not legally entitled to common-law marriage may be entitled to legal protection in the form of a domestic partnership. Some domestic partners may enter into non marital relationship contracts in order to agree, either verbally or in writing, to issues involving property ownership, support obligations, and similar issues common to marriage. (See effects of marriage and palimony.) Beyond agreements, registration of relationships in domestic partnership registries allow for the jurisdiction to formally acknowledge domestic partnerships as valid relationships with limited rights. Overview. Although the terms are sometimes used interchangeably, a Domestic Partnership, Same Sex Marriage or Civil Union are each separate and distinct legal concepts. The domestic partnership is a legal relationship between two people of the same or opposite sex who live together and share a domestic life, but are not married or joined by a civil union nor are blood relatives. It may be established by contract between the parties, but more often by registration according to procedures established by a state or municipal government. Benefits granted under a domestic partnership vary among different jurisdictions. Some accord full health benefits, others only a right of visitation. In still other jurisdictions, registered domestic partners are accorded a legal status similar to that of a married person with respect to matters of probate, guardianships, conservatorships, inheritance, protection from abuse, and related matters. Since the 2015 US Supreme Court's decision legalizing same-sex marriage, there have been fewer US domestic partnerships registered, but in many jurisdictions they are still allowed for couples of the same gender or different genders who do not want to marry but still would like to be eligible for certain benefits. Many couples opt for a domestic partnership after comparing the potential tax consequences of being married. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

In 2011, United States business entities incurred $29 billion in direct costs because of patent trolls. Lawsuits brought by "patent assertion companies" made up 61% of all patent cases in 2012, according to the Santa Clara University School of Law. From 2009 through mid-2013, Apple Inc. was the defendant in 171 lawsuits brought by non-practicing entities (NPEs), followed by Hewlett-Packard (137), Samsung (133), AT&T (127), and Dell (122). Patent troll-instigated litigation, once mostly confined to large companies in patent-dependent industries such as pharmaceuticals, came to involve companies of all sizes in a wide variety of industries. In 2005, patent trolls sued 800 small firms (those with less than $100 million annual revenue), the number growing to nearly 2,900 such firms in 2011; the median defendant's annual revenue was $10.3 million. A July 2014 PricewaterhouseCoopers study concluded that non-practicing entities (NPEs) accounted for 67 percent of all patent lawsuits filed—up from 28 percent five years earlier—and though the median monetary award size has shrunk over time, the median number of awards to NPEs was three times higher than those of practicing companies. A 2014 study from Harvard University, Harvard Business School and the University of Texas concluded that firms forced to pay patent trolls reduce R&D spending, averaging $211 million less than firms having won a lawsuit against a troll. That 2014 study also found that trolls tend to sue firms with fewer attorneys on staff, in effect encouraging firms to invest in legal representation at the expense of technology development. The 2014 study reported that trolls tend to opportunistically sue firms with more available cash, even if the firm's available cash was not earned in the technology that is the subject of the patent lawsuit, and targeting the firms long before a product begins turning a profit, thus disincentivizing investment in new technologies. Emphasis became progressively focused on patents covering software rather than chemical or mechanical inventions, given the difficulty in defining the scope of software patent claims in comparison to the more easily defined specific compounds in chemical patents. A GAO study concluded that the proportion of patent lawsuits initiated by trolls hadn't changed significantly from 2007 through 2011, the GAO speculating that the raw numerical increase in both troll and non-troll instituted lawsuits may be due to the "inherently imprecise" language and a lack of common, standardized, scientific vocabulary in constantly evolving emerging technologies such as software. Software patents were described as "particularly prone" to abuse because software is "inherently conceptual", with research indicating that a software patent is four times as likely as a chemical patent to be involved in litigation, and a software "business method patent" is thirteen times more likely to be litigated. On June 4, 2013, the National Economic Council and Council of Economic Advisers released a report entitled Patent Assertion and U.S. Innovation that found significant harm to the economy from such entities and made recommendations to address them. The report further stated: "Specific policies should focus on fostering clearer patents with a high standard of novelty and non-obviousness, reducing disparity in the costs of litigation for patent owners and technology users, and increasing the adaptability of the innovation system to challenges posed by new technologies and new business models, would likely have a similar effect today." --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

The law of restitution is the law of gains-based recovery, in which a court orders the defendant to give up their gains to the claimant. It should be contrasted with the law of compensation, the law of loss-based recovery, in which a court orders the defendant to pay the claimant for their loss. Evolving Meaning. American Jurisprudence 2d edition notes: The word "restitution" was used in the earlier common law to denote the return or restoration of a specific thing or condition. In modern legal usage, its meaning has frequently been extended to include not only the restoration or giving back of something to its rightful owner and returning to the status quo but also compensation, reimbursement, indemnification, or reparation for benefits derived from, or for loss or injury caused to, another. In summary, therefore, the word "restitution" means the relinquishment of a benefit or the return of money or other property obtained through an improper means to the person from whom the property was taken. Legal vs Equitable Remedy. Restitution may be either a legal remedy or an equitable remedy, "depending upon the basis for the plaintiff's claim and the nature of the underlying remedies sought". Generally, restitution and equitable tracing is an equitable remedy when the money or property wrongfully in the possession of the defendant is traceable (for example, can be tied to "particular funds or property"). In such a case, restitution comes in the form of a constructive trust or equitable lien. Where the particular property at issue cannot be particularly identified, restitution is a legal remedy. This occurs, for example, when the plaintiff "seeks a judgment imposing personal liability to pay a sum of money". This type of damages restores the benefit conferred to the non-breaching party. Put simply, the plaintiff will get the value of whatever was conferred to the defendant when there was a contract. There are two general limits to recovery, which is that a complete breach of contract is needed, and the damages will be capped at the contract price if the restitution damages exceed it. Differing Views on Restitution. The orthodox view suggests that there is only one principle on which the law of restitution is dependent, namely the principle of unjust enrichment. However, the view that restitution, like other legal responses, can be triggered by any one of a variety of causative events is increasingly prevalent. These are events in the real world which trigger a legal response. It is beyond doubt that unjust enrichment and wrongs can trigger an obligation to make restitution. Certain commentators propose that there is a third basis for restitution, namely the vindication of property rights with which the defendant has interfered. It is arguable that other types of causative events can also trigger an obligation to make restitution. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

In criminal law, diminished responsibility (or diminished capacity) is a potential defense by excuse by which defendants argue that although they broke the law, they should not be held fully criminally liable for doing so, as their mental functions were "diminished" or impaired. Diminished capacity is a partial defense to charges that require that the defendant act with a particular state of mind. For example, if the felony murder rule does not apply, first degree murder requires that the state prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant acted with premeditation, deliberation, and the specific intent to kill—all three are necessary elements of the state's case. If evidence exists, sufficient to create a reasonable doubt as to whether the defendant because of mental illness or "defect" possessed the capacity to premeditate, deliberate or form the specific intent to kill then the state cannot convict the defendant of first degree murder. This does not mean that the defendant is entitled to an acquittal. The defendant still might be convicted of second-degree murder which only requires that the defendant act with general malice. The defense's acceptance in American jurisdictions varies considerably. The majority of states have adopted it by statute or case decision, and a minority even recognise broader defenses such as "irresistible impulse". Some U.S. states restrict the defense to the charge of murder only where a successful defense will result in a manslaughter conviction instead of murder. Until recently, the Republic of Ireland did not accept the partial defense. The Irish Supreme Court had rejected the existence of the defense in DPP v O'Mahony. The case was recently abrogated, however, by enactment of the Criminal Law (Insanity) Act 2006, effective June 1, 2006. The act, in pertinent part, specifically adopted the partial defense for the charge of murder where a successful defense will result in a manslaughter conviction instead of murder. The defense is to be contrasted with insanity which is a complete but affirmative defense. In most jurisdictions a defendant would be acquitted on the grounds of insanity if the defendant established to the satisfaction of the jury that he suffered from such a mental disease or defect that he was unable to appreciate the consequences of his actions or did not know what he was doing was wrong. As noted a successful insanity defense will result in acquittal although a number of jurisdictions have adopted the guilty but insane verdict. The defense of insanity and diminished capacity although clearly distinct are not inconsistent defenses and both may be at issue in the same case. The critical distinctions are that diminished capacity is a partial, negating defense (negates an element of the state's case) with the burden on the state to show that the defendant acted with the requisite state of mind while insanity is a complete but affirmative defense—the defendant bearing the burden of proving that he was legally insane. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

A trust may have multiple trustees, and these trustees are the legal owners of the trust's property, but have a fiduciary duty to beneficiaries and various duties, such as a duty of care and a duty to inform. If trustees do not adhere to these duties, they may be removed through a legal action. The trustee may be either a person or a legal entity such as a company, but typically the trust itself is not a legal entity and any litigation involving the trust must include the trustee as a party. A trustee has many rights and responsibilities which vary based on the jurisdiction and trust instrument. If a trust lacks a trustee, a court may appoint a trustee. The trustees administer the affairs attendant to the trust. The trust's affairs may include prudently investing the assets of the trust, accounting for and reporting periodically to the beneficiaries, filing required tax returns and other duties. In some cases dependent upon the trust instrument, the trustees must make discretionary decisions as to whether beneficiaries should receive trust assets for their benefit. A trustee may be held personally liable for problems, although fiduciary liability insurance similar to directors and officers liability insurance can be purchased. For example, a trustee could be liable if assets are not properly invested. In addition, a trustee may be liable to its beneficiaries even where the trust has made a profit but consent has not been given. However, in the United States, similar to directors and officers, an exculpatory clause may minimize liability; although this was previously held to be against public policy, this position has changed. In the United States, the Uniform Trust Code provides for reasonable compensation and reimbursement for trustees subject to review by courts, although trustees may be unpaid. Commercial banks acting as trustees typically charge about 1% of assets under management. Beneficiaries. The beneficiaries are beneficial (or 'equitable') owners of the trust property. Either immediately or eventually, the beneficiaries will receive income from the trust property, or they will receive the property itself. The extent of a beneficiary's interest depends on the wording of the trust document. One beneficiary may be entitled to income (for example, interest from a bank account), whereas another may be entitled to the entirety of the trust property when they attain the age of twenty-five years. The settlor has much discretion when creating the trust, subject to some limitations imposed by law. The use of trusts as a means to inherit substantial wealth may be associated with some negative connotations; some beneficiaries who are able to live comfortably from trust proceeds without having to work a job may be jokingly referred to as "trust fund babies" (regardless of age) or "trustafarians" --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

A civil union (also known as a civil partnership) is a legally recognized arrangement similar to marriage, created primarily as a means to provide recognition in law for same-sex couples. Civil unions grant some or all of the rights of marriage (with child adoption being a common exception, and the title itself). Civil unions under one name or another have been established by law in several, mostly developed, countries in order to provide legal recognition of relationships formed by unmarried same-sex couples and to afford them rights, benefits, tax breaks, and responsibilities similar or identical to those of legally married couples. In 1989, Denmark was the first country to legalize civil unions, for same-sex couples; however most other developed democracies did not begin establishing civil unions until the 1990s or early 2000s, often developing them from less formal domestic partnerships. While civil unions are often established for both opposite-sex couples and same-sex couples, in a number of countries they are available to same-sex couples only. In Brazil, civil unions were first created for opposite-sex couples in 2002, and then expanded to include same-sex couples through a supreme court ruling in 2011. In the majority of countries that established same-sex civil unions, they have since been either supplemented or replaced by same-sex marriage. Civil unions are viewed by LGBT rights campaigners as a "first step" towards establishing same-sex marriage, as civil unions are viewed by supporters of LGBT rights as a "separate but equal" or "second class" status. Many jurisdictions with civil unions recognize foreign unions if those are essentially equivalent to their own; for example, the United Kingdom lists equivalent unions in the Civil Partnership Act 2004 Schedule 20. The marriages of same-sex couples performed abroad may be recognized as civil unions in jurisdictions that only have the latter. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

In international law and business, patent trolling or patent hoarding is a categorical or pejorative term applied to a person or company that attempts to enforce patent rights against accused infringers far beyond the patent's actual value or contribution to the prior art, often through hardball legal tactics (frivolous litigation, vexatious litigation, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPP), chilling effects, and the like). Patent trolls often do not manufacture products or supply services based upon the patents in question. However, some entities which do not practice their asserted patent may not be considered "patent trolls" when they license their patented technologies on reasonable terms in advance. Other related concepts include patent holding company (PHC), patent assertion entity (PAE), and non-practicing entity (NPE), which may or may not be considered a "patent troll" depending on the position they are taking and the perception of that position by the public. While in most cases the entities termed "trolls" are operating within the bounds of the legal system, their aggressive tactics achieve outcomes contrary to the origins of the patent system, as a legislated social contract to foster and protect innovation; the rapid rise of the modern information economy has put the global intellectual property system under more strain. Patent trolling has been less of a problem in Europe than in the United States because Europe has a loser pays costs regime. In contrast, the U.S. generally employs the American rule, under which each party is responsible for paying its own attorney's fees. However, after the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Octane Fitness, LLC v ICON Health & Fitness, Inc on April 29, 2014, it is now easier for courts to award costs for frivolous patent lawsuits. Etymology and definition. The term patent troll was used at least once in 1993, albeit with a slightly different meaning, to describe countries that file aggressive patent lawsuits. The 1994 educational video, The Patents Video also used the term, depicting a green troll guarding a bridge and demanding fees. The origin of the term patent troll has also been variously attributed to Anne Gundelfinger, or Peter Detkin, both counsel for Intel, during the late 1990s. Patent troll is currently a controversial term, susceptible to numerous definitions, none of which are considered satisfactory from the perspective of understanding how patent trolls should be treated in law. Definitions often include a party that does one or more of the following: Purchases a patent, often from a bankrupt firm, and then sues another company by claiming that one of its products infringes on the purchased patent; Enforces patents against purported infringers without itself intending to manufacture the patented product or supply the patented service; (some argue this could be true even for the original inventor, whereas other draw a clear distinction on this point); Enforces patents but has no manufacturing or research base; Focuses its efforts solely on enforcing patent rights; or Asserts patent infringement claims against non-copiers or against a large industry that is composed of non-copiers. The term "patent pirate" has been used to describe both patent trolling and acts of patent infringement. Related expressions are "non-practising entity" (NPE) (defined as "a patent owner who does not manufacture or use the patented invention, but rather than abandoning the right to exclude, an NPE seeks to enforce its right through the negotiation of licenses and litigation"), "patent assertion entity" (PAE), "non-manufacturing patentee", "patent shark", "patent marketer", "patent assertion company", and "patent dealer". --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

An account of profits (sometimes referred to as an accounting for profits or simply an accounting) is a type of equitable remedy most commonly used in cases of breach of fiduciary duty. It is an action taken against a defendant to recover the profits taken as a result of the breach of duty, in order to prevent unjust enrichment. In conducting an account of profits, the plaintiff is treated as if they were conducting the business of the defendant, and made those profits which were attributable to the defendant's wrongful actions. This can be rather complex in practice, because the defendant's accounting records must be examined (sometimes by a forensic accountant) to determine what portion of his gross profits were derived from the wrongful act in question. As a result, mathematical exactness is not called for and reasonable approximation is acceptable. Historically an account was not an equitable remedy, but was an action at common law, and is therefore technically an instrument of law, though it arose at a time before the distinction between law and equity was marked. Co-owners in concurrent estates also have the right to an accounting of profits, in order to properly apportion income from the use or leasing of the property. The remedy is also available against strangers to a trust who "dishonestly assist" an express trustee in a breach of the trustee's fiduciary duty. Case law has shown roughly two approaches to assessing the extent of an account of profits: To account not of the entire business but of the particular benefits which flowed to him in breach of his duty; To account for the entire business and its profits, due allowance being made for the time, energy, skill and financial contribution of the fiduciary (the approach in Boardman v Phipps). An injunction is an equitable remedy in the form of a special court order that compels a party to do or refrain from specific acts. "When a court employs the extraordinary remedy of injunction, it directs the conduct of a party, and does so with the backing of its full coercive powers." A party that fails to comply with an injunction faces criminal or civil penalties, including possible monetary sanctions and even imprisonment. They can also be charged with contempt of court. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Consent occurs when one person voluntarily agrees to the proposal or desires of another. It is a term of common speech, with specific definitions as used in such fields as the law, medicine, research, and sexual relationships. Consent as understood in specific contexts may differ from its everyday meaning. For example, a person with a mental disorder, a low mental age, or under the legal age of sexual consent may willingly engage in a sexual act that still fails to meet the legal threshold for consent as defined by applicable law. United Nations agencies and initiatives in sex education programs believe that teaching the topic of consent as part of a comprehensive sexuality education is beneficial. Types of consent include implied consent, express consent, informed consent and unanimous consent. Types. An expression of consent is one that is unmistakably stated, rather than implied. It may be given in writing, by speech (orally), or non-verbally, for example by a clear gesture such as a nod. Non-written express consent not evidenced by witnesses or an audio or video recording may be disputed if a party denies that it was given. Implied consent is consent inferred from a person's actions and the facts and circumstances of a particular situation (or in some cases, by a person's silence or inaction). Examples include unambiguously soliciting or initiating sexual activity or the implied consent to physical contact by participants in a hockey game or being assaulted in a boxing match. Informed consent in medicine is consent given by a person who has a clear appreciation and understanding of the facts, implications, and future consequences of an action. The term is also used in other contexts, such as in social scientific research, when participants are asked to affirm that they understand the research procedure and consent to it, or in sex, where informed consent means each person engaging in sexual activity is aware of any positive statuses (for sexually transmitted infections and or diseases) they might expose themselves to. Unanimous consent, or general consent, by a group of several parties (for example, an association) is consent given by all parties. Substituted consent, or the substituted judgment doctrine, allows a decision maker to attempt to establish the decision an incompetent person would have made if they were competent. In international law, consent involves states, not individuals. Consent is a crucial principle of international law that necessitates the agreement of all relevant parties for any changes in rules to be legally binding. However, some legal scholars propose that a consensus among states, rather than the explicit consent of each state, may be the standard by which a rule is considered obligatory and enforceable. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

A trust is a legal relationship in which the holder of a right gives it to another person or entity who must keep and use it solely for another's benefit. In the Anglo-American common law, the party who entrusts the right is known as the "settlor", the party to whom the right is entrusted is known as the "trustee", the party for whose benefit the property is entrusted is known as the "beneficiary", and the entrusted property itself is known as the "corpus" or "trust property". A testamentary trust is created by a will and arises after the death of the settlor. An inter vivos trust is created during the settlor's lifetime by a trust instrument. A trust may be revocable or irrevocable; an irrevocable trust can be "broken" (revoked) only by a judicial proceeding. The trustee is the legal owner of the property in trust, as fiduciary for the beneficiary or beneficiaries who are or are the equitable owners of the trust property. Trustees thus have a fiduciary duty to manage the trust to the benefit of the equitable owners. They must provide a regular accounting of trust income and expenditures. Trustees may be compensated and be reimbursed for their expenses. A court of competent jurisdiction can remove a trustee who breaches their fiduciary duty. Some breaches of fiduciary duty can be charged and tried as criminal offenses in a court of law. A trustee can be a natural person, a business entity or a public body. A trust in the United States may be subject to federal and state taxation. A trust is created by a settlor, who transfers title to some or all of their property to a trustee, who then holds title to that property in trust for the benefit of the beneficiaries. The trust is governed by the terms under which it was created. In most jurisdictions, this requires a contractual trust agreement or deed. It is possible for a single individual to assume the role of more than one of these parties, and for multiple individuals to share a single role. For example, in a living trust it is common for the grantor to be both a trustee and a lifetime beneficiary while naming other contingent beneficiaries. Trusts have existed since Roman times and have become one of the most important innovations in property law. Trust law has evolved through court rulings differently in different jurisdictions, so statements in this article are generalizations; understanding the jurisdiction-specific case law involved is tricky. Some U.S. states are adapting the Uniform Trust Code to codify and harmonize their trust laws, but state-specific variations still remain. An owner placing property into trust turns over part of their bundle of rights to the trustee, separating the property's legal ownership and control from its equitable ownership and benefits. This may be done for tax reasons or to control the property and its benefits if the settlor is absent, incapacitated, or deceased. Testamentary trusts may be created in wills, defining how money and property will be handled for children or other beneficiaries. While the trustee is given legal title to the trust property, in accepting title the trustee owes a number of fiduciary duties to the beneficiaries. The primary duties owed are those of loyalty, prudence and impartiality. Trustees may be held to a very high standard of care in their dealings to enforce their behavior. To ensure beneficiaries receive their due, trustees are subject to a number of ancillary duties in support of the primary duties, including duties of openness and transparency, and duties of recordkeeping, accounting, and disclosure. In addition, a trustee has a duty to know, understand, and abide by the terms of the trust and relevant law. The trustee may be compensated and have expenses reimbursed, but otherwise must turn over all profits from the trust properties and neither endebt nor riskily speculate on the trust assets without the written, clear permission of all of the adult beneficiaries. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

A civil union (also known as a civil partnership) is a legally recognized arrangement similar to marriage, created primarily as a means to provide recognition in law for same-sex couples. Civil unions grant some or all of the rights of marriage (with child adoption being a common exception, and the title itself). Civil unions under one name or another have been established by law in several, mostly developed, countries in order to provide legal recognition of relationships formed by unmarried same-sex couples and to afford them rights, benefits, tax breaks, and responsibilities similar or identical to those of legally married couples. In 1989, Denmark was the first country to legalize civil unions, for same-sex couples; however most other developed democracies did not begin establishing civil unions until the 1990s or early 2000s, often developing them from less formal domestic partnerships. While civil unions are often established for both opposite-sex couples and same-sex couples, in a number of countries they are available to same-sex couples only. In Brazil, civil unions were first created for opposite-sex couples in 2002, and then expanded to include same-sex couples through a supreme court ruling in 2011. In the majority of countries that established same-sex civil unions, they have since been either supplemented or replaced by same-sex marriage. Civil unions are viewed by LGBT rights campaigners as a "first step" towards establishing same-sex marriage, as civil unions are viewed by supporters of LGBT rights as a "separate but equal" or "second class" status. Many jurisdictions with civil unions recognize foreign unions if those are essentially equivalent to their own; for example, the United Kingdom lists equivalent unions in the Civil Partnership Act 2004 Schedule 20. The marriages of same-sex couples performed abroad may be recognized as civil unions in jurisdictions that only have the latter. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Brand protection is the process and set of actions that a right holder undertakes to prevent third parties from using its intellectual property without permission, as this may cause loss of revenue and, usually more importantly, destroys brand equity, reputation and trust. Brand protection seeks primarily to ensure that trademarks, patents, and copyrights are respected, though other intellectual property rights such as industrial design rights or trade dress can be involved. Counterfeiting is the umbrella term to designate infringements to intellectual property, with the exception of the term piracy which is sometimes (colloquially) used to refer to copyright infringement. A more narrow definition of brand protection which focuses on trademark infringement, is sometimes used. Counterfeiting of physical goods that involves trademark infringement is indeed one of the predominant forms of intellectual property infringement. However, both copyright and patent infringement are possible without an associated trademark infringement, and both may result in loss of revenue and of brand equity. Eliminating diversion, gray market, or product theft and resale, are generally considered as part of a brand protection strategy, even though an intellectual property may not be necessarily infringed. A copyright troll is a party (person or company) that enforces copyrights it owns for purposes of making money through strategic litigation, in a manner considered unduly aggressive or opportunistic, sometimes while without producing or licensing the works it owns for paid distribution. Critics object to the activity because they believe it does not encourage the production of creative works, but instead makes money through the inequities and unintended consequences of high statutory damages provisions in copyright laws intended to encourage creation of such works. Both the term and the concept of a copyright troll began to appear in the mid-2000s. It derives from the pejorative "patent trolls", which are companies that enforce patent rights to earn money from companies that are selling products, without having products of their own for sale. It is distinguished from organizations such as ASCAP, which collect royalties and enforce copyrights of their members. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

A constructive trust is an equitable remedy imposed by a court to benefit a party that has been wrongfully deprived of its rights due to either a person obtaining or holding a legal property right which they should not possess due to unjust enrichment or interference, or due to a breach of fiduciary duty, which is intercausative with unjust enrichment and or property interference. It is a type of implied trust (for example, it is created by conduct, not explicitly by a settler). In the United States (in contrast to England), a constructive trust remedy generally does not recognize or create any continuing fiduciary relationship — that is, a constructive trust is not actually a trust except in name. Rather, it is a fiction declaring that the plaintiff has equitable title to the property at issue, and ordering the defendant to transfer legal ownership and possession to the plaintiff. For instance, in some states the slayer rule is implemented in the form of a constructive trust. Definition. Constructive trusts are imposed by operation of law. They are also referred to as implied trusts. They are not subject to formality requirements. Unlike a resulting trust, which also arises by operation of law, a constructive trust does not give effect to the imputed or presumed intention of the parties. Instead, constructive trusts are largely said to be triggered by unconscionability. This is the idea that a defendant would be unjustly enriched if they were allowed to keep property for themselves. The main issue with this argument is that we would have to have a really broad approach to unjust enrichment in order for a constructive trust to come under that underpinning concept in order for us to understand constructive trust. This statement is incoherent and without any basis in law or fact. Events generating constructive trusts. Breach of fiduciary duty. In a constructive trust the defendant breaches a duty owed to the plaintiff. The most common such breach is a breach of fiduciary duty, such as when an agent wrongfully obtains or holds property owned by a principal. A controversial example is the case of Attorney General for Hong Kong v Reid, in which a senior prosecutor took bribes not to prosecute certain offenders. With the bribe money, he purchased property in New Zealand. His employer, the Attorney-General, sought a declaration that the property was held on constructive trust for it, on the basis of breach of fiduciary duty. The Privy Council awarded a constructive trust. The case is different from Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver, because there was no interference with a profit-making opportunity that properly belonged to the prosecutor. Being a Privy Council decision, Reid did not overrule the previous decision of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales in Lister v Stubbs which held the opposite, partially because a trust is a very strong remedy that gives proprietary rights to the claimant not enjoyed by the defendant's other creditors. In the event of the defendant's insolvency, the trust assets are untouchable by the general creditors. Supporters of Lister suggested that there was no good reason to put the victim of wrongdoing ahead of other creditors of the estate. There was a tension in English law between Lister and Reid which was highlighted in Sinclair Investments (UK) Ltd v Versailles Trade Finance Ltd. The United Kingdom Supreme Court subsequently overruled Sinclair in FHR European Ventures LLP v Cedar Capital Partners LLC, holding that Lister was no longer a good law. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Sleep. The Australian Model Criminal Code Committee states the law as follows: At the minimum there needs to be some operation of the will before a physical movement is described as an act. The physical movements of a person who is asleep, for example, probably should not be regarded as acts at all, and certainly should not be regarded as acts for the purposes of criminal responsibility. These propositions are embodied in the rule that people are not held responsible for involuntary 'acts', that is, physical movements which occur without there being any will to perform that act. This situation is usually referred to as automatism. In the U.S., People v Huey Newton (1970) holds that unconsciousness, when not self-induced (say, as by voluntary intoxication), is a complete defense to a criminal act even though the defendant's acts seem very goal-oriented. The medical evidence was that " gunshot wound which penetrates in a body cavity, the abdominal cavity or the thoracic cavity is very likely to produce a profound reflex shock reaction, that is quite different from a gunshot wound which penetrates only skin and muscle and it is not at all uncommon for a person shot in the abdomen to lose consciousness and go into this reflex shock condition for short periods of time up to half an hour or so." But the reflexive activity or unconsciousness need not cause physical collapse: it can exist where the subject physically acts in fact, but is not at the time conscious of acting (cf some European continental jurisdictions classify conduct resulting from automatism under the rubric of unconsciousness). In R v Cogdon (1950), unreported but noted in Morris, Somnambulistic Homicide: Ghosts, Spiders and North Koreans (1951), the defendant struck her daughter on the head with an ax while sleepwalking and dreaming about North Koreans. Her movements were not voluntary, so she was acquitted. This interpretation of automatism is consistent with Lord Denning's dicta in Bratty v Attorney-General for Northern Ireland (1963): No act is punishable if it is done involuntarily: and an involuntary act in this context – some people nowadays prefer to speak of it as 'automatism' – means an act which is done by the muscles without any control by the mind, such as a spasm, a reflex action or a convulsion; or an act done by a person who is not conscious of what he is doing, such as an act done whilst suffering from a concussion or whilst sleepwalking. Situations involving hypnotism, concussion, and sleepwalking may involve apparently deliberate and purposeful conduct. In fact this is the case for many situations where the defense of automatism is presented – spasms or reflex actions are rarely likely to be perceived as criminally liable acts. As for sleepwalking itself, the Canadian case of R v Parks exemplifies a certain judicial willingness to regard a sleepwalker as behaving as an automaton even though he had performed apparently goal-directed acts. The accused fell asleep in his living room. A few hours later he got up and drove 23 kilometers to his in-laws' home. Still asleep, he entered the house, found a knife in the kitchen and went to the bedroom where his in-laws were sleeping. He strangled and cut his father in-law, who survived the attack. The mother in-law died from the repeated stab wounds and the brutal beating. The medical experts at trial unanimously agreed that the accused was sleepwalking and that sleepwalking was not a "disease of mind". The Supreme Court agreed and held that sleepwalking can negate the voluntary ingredient of the actus reus. There is widespread disagreement among forensic sleep experts that Kenneth Parks was in fact sleepwalking – it is not entirely clear the reason why the prosecution did not call its own experts on sleepwalking, one explanation being frank disbelief that the defense could succeed. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

An elective share is a term used in American law relating to inheritance, which describes a proportion of an estate which the surviving spouse of the deceased may claim in place of what they were left in the decedent's will. It may also be called a widow's share, statutory share, election against the will, or forced share. Function and operation. The elective share is the modern version of the English common law concepts of dower and curtesy, both of which reserved certain portions of a decedent's estate which were reserved for the surviving spouse to prevent them from falling into poverty and becoming a burden on the community. Currently, the amount to be reserved for a spouse is determined by the law of the state where the estate is located. In most states, the elective share is between one-third and one-half of all the property in the estate, although many states require the marriage to have lasted a certain number of years for the elective share to be claimed, or adjust the share based on the length of the marriage, and the presence of minor children. Some states also reduce the elective share if the surviving spouse is independently wealthy. In some jurisdictions, if the spouse claims the elective share, they get that amount, but nothing else from the estate. In other states, claiming an elective share has no effect on gifts under a will or through a trust (though things given by will or trust may fulfill in part the elective share portion). Obviously, there would be no point in seeking an elective share if the surviving spouse has already been willed more than they would receive under the statute. Furthermore, some assets held by the estate may be exempt from becoming part of the elective share, so their value is subtracted from the total value of the estate before the elective share is calculated. Some states also permit children of the deceased to claim an elective share. Pretermitted heir. In the law of property, a pretermitted heir is a person who would likely stand to inherit under a will, except that the testator (the person who wrote the will) did not include the person in the testator's will. Omission may occur because the testator did not know of the omitted person at the time the will was written. A will may contain a clause that explicitly disinherits any heirs unknown at the time that the will is executed, or any heirs not named in the will. While such a clause will not necessarily prevent a claim against an estate by a pretermitted heir, it may make it more difficult to succeed in such an action. Forced heirship is a form of testate partible inheritance which mandates how the deceased's estate is to be disposed of and which tends to guarantee an inheritance for the family of the deceased. In forced heirship, the estate of a deceased (de cujus) is separated into two portions. (1) An indefeasible portion, the forced estate (passing to the deceased's next-of-ki. (2) A discretionary portion, or free estate, to be freely disposed of by will. Forced heirship is generally a feature of civil-law legal systems which do not recognize total freedom of testation, in contrast with common law jurisdictions. Normally in forced heirship, the deceased's estate is in-gathered and wound up without discharging liabilities, which means accepting inheritance includes accepting the liabilities attached to inherited property. The forced estate is divided into shares which include the share of issue (legitime or child's share) and the spousal share. This provides a minimum protection that cannot be defeated by will. The free estate, on the other hand, is at the discretion of a testator to be distributed by will on death to whomever he or she chooses. Takers in the forced estate are known as forced heirs. The expression comes from Louisianan legal language and is ultimately a calque of Spanish sucesión forzosa. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Common-law marriage, also known as non-ceremonial marriage, sui iuris marriage, informal marriage, de facto marriage, or marriage by habit and repute, is a legal framework where a couple may be considered married without having formally registered their relation as a civil or religious marriage. The original concept of a "common-law marriage" is one considered valid by both partners, but not formally recorded with a state or religious registry, nor celebrated in a formal civil or religious service. In effect, the act of the couple representing themselves to others as being married and organizing their relationship as if they were married, means they are married. The term common-law marriage (or similar) has wider informal use, often to denote relations that are not legally recognized as marriages. It is often used colloquially or by the media to refer to cohabiting couples, regardless of any legal rights or religious implications involved. This can create confusion in regard to the term and to the legal rights of unmarried partners (in addition to the actual status of the couple referred to). Terminology. Common-law marriage is a marriage that takes legal effect without the prerequisites of a marriage license or participation in a marriage ceremony. The marriage occurs when two people who are legally capable of being married, and who intend to be married, live together as a married couple and hold themselves out to the world as a married couple. Common-law marriage vs. cohabitation. The term "common-law marriage" is often used incorrectly to describe various types of couple relationships, such as cohabitation (whether or not registered) or other legally formalized relations. Although these interpersonal relationships are often called "common-law marriage", they differ from its original meaning in that they are not legally recognized as "marriages" but are a parallel interpersonal status such as a "domestic partnership", "registered partnership", "conjugal union" or "civil union". Non-marital relationship contracts are not necessarily recognized from one jurisdiction to another. In Canada, while some provinces may extend to couples in marriage-like relationships many of the rights and responsibilities of a marriage, they are not legally considered married. They may be legally defined as "unmarried spouses" and for many purposes such as taxes and financial claims, and within those contexts treated the same as married spouses. A 2008 poll in the UK showed that 51% of respondents incorrectly believed that cohabitants had the same rights as married couples. In Scotland, common-law marriage does not exist, although there was a type of irregular marriage called 'marriage by cohabitation with habit and repute' which could apply to couples in special circumstances until 2006, and was abolished by the Family Law (Scotland) Act 2006 (irregular marriages established before 4 May 2006 are recognised). --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Those who oppose these practices argue that distribution denies the copyright holder potential sales, in the form of re-released titles, official emulation, and so on. Likewise, they argue that if people can acquire an old version of a program for free, they may be less likely to purchase a newer version if the old version meets their needs. From game developers with sympathy with abandonware. Some game developers showed sympathy for abandonware websites as they preserve their classical game titles. In this quote Richard Garriott states, “Personally, I think that sites that support these old games are a good thing for both consumers and copyright owners. If the options are (a) having a game be lost forever and (b) having it available on one of these sites, I'd want it to be available. That being said, I believe a game is 'abandoned' only long after it is out of print. And just because a book is out of print does not give me rights to print some for my friends.” In this quote Tim Schafer states, “Is it piracy? Yeah, sure. But so what? Most of the game makers aren't living off the revenue from those old games anymore. Most of the creative teams behind all those games have long since left the companies that published them, so there's no way the people who deserve to are still making royalties off them. So go ahead—steal this game! Spread the love!” In this quote Chris Taylor states, “If I owned the copyright on Total Annihilation, I would probably allow it to be shared for free by now (four years after it was originally released)” Law. In most cases, software classed as abandonware is not in the public domain, as it has never had its original copyright officially revoked and some company or individual may still own rights. While sharing of such software is usually considered copyright infringement, in practice copyright holders rarely enforce their abandonware copyrights for a number of reasons – chiefly among which the software is technologically obsolete and therefore has no commercial value, therefore rendering copyright enforcement a pointless enterprise. By default, this may allow the product to de facto lapse into the public domain to such an extent that enforcement becomes impractical. Rarely has any abandonware case gone to court, but it is still unlawful to distribute copies of old copyrighted software and games, with or without compensation, in any Berne Convention signatory country. Enforcement of copyright. Old copyrights are usually left undefended. This can be due to intentional non-enforcement by owners due to software age or obsolescence, but sometimes results from a corporate copyright holder going out of business without explicitly transferring ownership, leaving no one aware of the right to defend the copyright. Even if the copyright is not defended, copying of such software is still unlawful in most jurisdictions when a copyright is still in effect. Abandonware changes hands on the assumption that the resources required to enforce copyrights outweigh benefits a copyright holder might realize from selling software licenses. Additionally, abandonware proponents argue that distributing software for which there is no one to defend the copyright is morally acceptable, even where unsupported by current law. Companies that have gone out of business without transferring their copyrights are an example of this; many hardware and software companies that developed older systems are long since out of business and precise documentation of the copyrights may not be readily available. Often the availability of abandonware on the Internet is related to the willingness of copyright holders to defend their copyrights. For example, unencumbered games for Colecovision are markedly easier to find on the Internet than unencumbered games for Mattel Intellivision in large part because there is still a company that sells Intellivision games while no such company exists for the Colecovision. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Equitable remedies are judicial remedies developed by courts of equity from about the time of Henry the 8th to provide more flexible responses to changing social conditions than was possible in precedent-based common law. Equitable remedies were granted by the Court of Chancery in England, and remain available today in most common law jurisdictions. In many jurisdictions, legal and equitable remedies have been merged and a single court can issue either, or both, remedies. Despite widespread judicial merger, the distinction between equitable and legal remedies remains relevant in a number of significant instances. Notably, the United States Constitution's Seventh Amendment preserves the right to a jury trial in civil cases over $20 to cases "at common law". Equity is said to operate on the conscience of the defendant, so an equitable remedy is always directed at a particular person, and that person's knowledge, state of mind and motives may be relevant to whether a remedy should be granted or not. Equitable remedies are distinguished from "legal" remedies (which are available to a successful claimant as of right) by the discretion of the court to grant them. In common law jurisdictions, there are a variety of equitable remedies, but the principal remedies are: injunction, specific performance, account of profits, rescission, rectification, equitable estoppel, certain proprietary remedies, such as constructive trusts, subrogation, in very specific circumstances, an equitable lien, equitable compensation, appointment or removal of fiduciary, Interpleader and equitable tracing as a remedy for unjust enrichment. Specific performance is an equitable remedy in the law of contract, whereby a court issues an order requiring a party to perform a specific act, such as to complete performance of the contract. It is typically available in the sale of land law, but otherwise is not generally available if damages are an appropriate alternative. Specific performance is almost never available for contracts of personal service, although performance may also be ensured through the threat of proceedings for contempt of court. An injunction, often concerning confidential information or real property, is a type or subset of specific performance and is one of the more commonly-used forms of specific performance. While specific performance can be in the form of any type of forced action, it is usually to complete a previously established transaction, thus being the most effective remedy in protecting the expectation interest of the innocent party to a contract. It is usually the opposite of a prohibitory injunction, but there are mandatory injunctions that have a similar effect to specific performance and these kinds of distinctions are often difficult to apply in practice or even illusory. At common law, a claimant's rights were limited to an award of damages. Later, the court of equity developed the remedy of specific performance instead, should damages prove inadequate. Specific performance is often guaranteed through the remedy of a right of possession, giving the plaintiff the right to take possession of the property in dispute. As with all equitable remedies, orders of specific performance are discretionary, so their availability depends on its appropriateness in the circumstances. Such orders are granted when damages are not an adequate remedy and in some specific cases such as land (which is regarded as unique). --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

In criminal law, automatism is a rarely used criminal defense. It is one of the mental condition defenses that relate to the mental state of the defendant. Automatism can be seen variously as lack of voluntariness, lack of culpability (unconsciousness) or excuse. Automatism means that the defendant was not aware of his or her actions when making the particular movements that constituted the illegal act. For example, Esther Griggs in 1858 threw her child out of a first floor window believing that the house was on fire, while having a sleep terror. In 2002, Peter Buck, lead guitarist of the band R E M, was cleared of several charges, including assault, which resulted from automatism brought on by a bad interaction between alcohol and sleeping pills. In a 2009 case in Aberporth in west Wales, Brian Thomas strangled his wife in their camper van, also during a sleep terror, when he mistook his wife for an intruder. The defense of automatism is denying that the person was acting in the sense that the criminal law demands. As such it is really a denial-of-proof – the defendant is asserting that the offense is not made out. The prosecution does not have to disprove the defense as is sometimes erroneously reported; the prosecution has to prove all the elements of the offense including the voluntary act requirement. Automatism is a defense even against strict liability crimes like dangerous driving, where no intent is necessary. There are several limitations to the defense of automatism in English law. Prior fault generally excludes automatism. Intoxication generally excludes automatism, even when involuntary. Any defense that rests on insanity comes under the M'Naghten rules. Under English law internal causes of automatism are generally judged to be insane automatism and so result in the special verdict (not guilty by reason of insanity) rather than simple acquittal. Scope. Automatism is arguably the only defense that excludes responsibility by negating the existence of the actus reus which uniquely allows it to be a defense to both conventional and strict liability offenses (although this argument could be extended to the status defense of insanity, too). Strict automatism is a denial of actus reus and therefore most commonly used as a defense against strict liability offenses. There are a number of reasons why a person may go into a state of automatism, including dissociation or hypo or hyperglycemia. Unconsciousness is the defense of denial of mens rea, which is easier to prove and hence more commonly used for non-strict liability crimes. For example, in cases of homicidal sleepwalking the illegal act is typically not denied but the intent to kill is. The defendant will typically be perplexed and confused and will not cover up the episode. Kenneth Parks, after killing his mother-in-law and severely injuring his father-in-law, drove to the police station stating that he thought he had killed some people. The person's movements seem purposeful - the sleepwalker interacts with their environment in a limited way. Nonetheless the sleepwalker is not conscious of their actions. The use of the term "automatism" for these situations causes some confusion, as in these cases it is really the lack of intent on the part of the defendant which denies the mens rea of the offense rather than the actus reus (although this distinction is problematic in many instances), better called "unconsciousness". Intention is a problem in crimes of strict liability. Very few people intend to crash their vehicles, so clearly something better than intent is required to define automatism. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Lapse and anti-lapse. Lapse and anti-lapse are complementary concepts under the US law of wills, which address the disposition of property that is willed to someone who dies before the testator (the writer of the will). Lapse. At common law, lapse occurs when the beneficiary or the devisee under the will predeceases the testator, invalidating the gift. The gift would instead revert to the residuary estate or be granted under the law of intestate succession. Anti-lapse statutes. Most common-law jurisdictions have enacted an anti-lapse statute to address this situation. The anti-lapse statute "saves" the bequest if it has been made to parties specified in the statute, usually members of the testator's immediate family, if they had issues that survived the testator. For example, the New York anti-lapse statute specifies brothers, sisters, and issue, specifically. If the anti-lapse statute does indeed apply, then the issue of the deceased beneficiary will inherit whatever was willed to the beneficiary. The testator can prevent the operation of an anti-lapse statute by providing that the gift will only go to the named beneficiary if that beneficiary survives the testator, or by simply stating in the will that the anti-lapse statute does not apply. Ademption, or ademption by extinction. Ademption, or ademption by extinction, is a common law doctrine used in the law of wills to determine what happens when property bequeathed under a will is no longer in the testator's estate at the time of the testator's death. For a devise (bequest) of a specific item of property (a specific gift), such property is considered adeemed, and the gift fails. For example, if a will bequeathed the testator's car to a specific beneficiary, but the testator owned no car at the time of his or her death, the gift would be adeemed and the aforementioned beneficiary would receive no gift at all. Abatement of debts and legacies. Abatement of debts and legacies is a common law doctrine of wills that holds that when the equitable assets of a deceased person are not sufficient to satisfy fully all the creditors, their debts must abate proportionately, and they must accept a dividend. Ademption by satisfaction. Ademption by satisfaction, also known as satisfaction of legacies, is a common law doctrine that determines the disposition of property under a will when the testator has made lifetime gifts to beneficiaries named in the will. Under the doctrine, a gift that the maker of the will (the testator) gives during his lifetime to a named beneficiary of the will is treated as an advance payment of that beneficiary's inheritance. If the probate court determines that the testator intended the lifetime gift to satisfy a bequest under the will, the amount of the lifetime gift is deducted from the amount that the beneficiary would have received under the will. Acts of independent significance. The doctrine of acts of independent significance at common law permits a testator to effectively change the disposition of his property without changing a will, if acts or events changing the disposition have some significance beyond avoiding the requirements of the will. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Abuse and infidelity. University of Chicago sociologist Linda Waite found that "16 percent of cohabiting women reported that arguments with their partners became physical during the past year, while only 5 percent of married women had similar experiences." Most cohabiting couples have a faithful relationship, but Waite's surveys also demonstrated that 20% of cohabiting women reported having secondary sex partners, compared to only 4% of married women. According to an article by Judith Treas and Deirdre Giesen, cohabiting couples are twice as likely to experience infidelity within the relationship than married couples. Fertility. Regarding cohabitation as a fertility factor, a large survey in the United States came to the result that married women had an average of 1.9 children, compared to 1.3 among those cohabiting. The corresponding numbers for men were 1.7 and 1.1, respectively. The difference of 0.6 children for both sexes was expected to decrease to between 0.2 and 0.3 over the lifetime when correcting for the confounder that married people have their children earlier in life. A study of the United States and multiple countries in Europe came to the result that women who continue to cohabit after birth have significantly lower probability of having a second child than married women in all countries except those in Eastern Europe. Another study, on the contrary, came to the result that cohabiting couples in France have equal fertility as married ones. Also, Russians have a higher fertility within cohabitation, while Romanians rather tend to have childless marriages. Survey data from 2003 in Romania came to the result that marriage equalized the total fertility rate among both highly educated and low educated people to approximately 1.4. Among those cohabiting, on the other hand, a lower level of education increased fertility rate to 1.7, and a higher level of education decreased it to 0.7. On the other hand, another study came to the result that Romanian women with little education have about equal fertility in marital and cohabiting partnerships. Financial effects. In the United States, married couples that submit a combined tax return may face a marriage penalty, where tax credits for low-income single earners are not applied to the combined income. In October 1998, Senate GOP leader Trent Lott decided to pull a bill to abolish "the marriage penalty," "which in the tax code reflects the fact that married couples who both work for wages frequently pay more in taxes than if they earned the same amount of income but weren't married. And the more equal the incomes of the couple, the steeper the marriage tax penalty." The earned income tax credit (EITC) is cash welfare for low-income workers, but the problem is the EITC is not for married couples because they have to combine their wages, which again leads to "the marriage penalty." If couples do not get married then their wages do not have to combine and the EITC in a way is "paying for" low-income couples not to marry. Opponents of cohabitation believe that some cohabiting couples choose not to marry because they would suffer a tax penalty. Despite the perceived disincentive to marry that the EITC provides, cohabiting couples suffer many financial losses as their unions are not recognized with the same legal and financial benefits as those who are legally married. These financial penalties can include the costs of separate insurance policies and the costs of setting up legal protections similar to those that are automatically granted by the state upon marriage. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Abandonware is a product, typically software, ignored by its owner and manufacturer, and for which no official support is available. Within an intellectual rights contextual background, abandonware is a software (or hardware) sub-case of the general concept of orphan works. Museums and various organizations dedicated to preserving this software continue to provide legal access. The term "abandonware" is broad, and encompasses many types of old software. Definitions of "abandoned" vary, but in general it is like any item that is abandoned – it is ignored by the owner, and as such product support and possibly copyright enforcement are also "abandoned". Types. Commercial software unsupported but still owned by a viable company The availability of the software depends on the company's attitude toward the software. In many cases, the company which owns the software rights may not be that which originated it, or may not recognize their ownership. Some companies, such as Borland, make some software available online, in a form of freeware. Others, such as Microsoft, do not make old versions available for free use and do not permit people to copy the software. Commercial software owned by a company no longer in business. When no owning entity of a software exists, all activities (support, distribution, IP activities, etcetera) in relation to this software have ceased. If the rights to a software are non-recoverable in legal limbo ("orphaned work"), the software's rights cannot be bought by another company, and there is no company to enforce the copyright. An example of this is Digital Research's original PLI compiler for DOS: which was considered for many years as without an owner; Micro Focus, which acquired Novell, which had bought Digital Research's assets, owns this old PLI compiler, but has a more up-to-date PLI offering. Shareware whose author still makes it available. Finding historical versions, however, can be difficult since most shareware archives remove past versions with the release of new versions. Authors may or may not make older releases available. Some websites collect and offer for download old versions of shareware, freeware, and (in some cases) commercial applications. In some cases these sites had to remove past versions of software, particularly if the company producing that software still maintains it, or if later software releases introduce digital rights management, whereby old versions could be viewed as DRM circumvention. Unsupported or unmaintained shareware. Open source and freeware programs that have been abandoned. In some cases, source code remains available, which can prove a historical artifact. One such case is PC-LISP, still found online, which implements the Franz Lisp dialect. The DOS-based PC-LISP still runs well within emulators and on Microsoft Windows. Orphaned code. The source code or executable might still be available but the author is unknown or only identified by a dead email or equivalent and there is no realistic prospect of finding the owner of the IP. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Reliance damages is the measure of compensation given to a person who suffered an economic harm for acting in reliance on a party who failed to fulfill their obligation. If the injured party could go back in time, they should be indifferent to entering into the contract that would be breached and receiving the reliance damages as opposed to not entering into any contract with the breaching party. The injured party should be put in a substantially similar situation position as they would have been had the contract not been entered into. This is different from expectation damages, where the injured party should be indifferent between the fulfillment of the contract and never having entered into the contract. Scope. Reliance damages are valued by a party's reliance interest for the reasonably foreseeable amount. They put the injured party in the same financial position as if the contract had never been formed. Reliance interest is one of the three prongs of interest discussed by legal experts Lou Fuller and William Perdue in their 1936 article, "The Reliance Interest in Contract Damages." The other two interests are expectation interest and restitution interest. Application. Under contract law, in a bilateral contract two or more parties owe obligations to each other. Each party acts in reliance that the other party will fulfill their respective obligation. If one party fails to fulfill their obligation, then the other party may suffer economic harm. Reliance damages compensate the harmed party for the amount of damages they suffered for acting in reliance on the other party's contractual obligations. They are most often rewarded when the aggrieved party's damages are not capable of accurate estimation and ordering Specific Performance would be inappropriate. Specific performance should never be associated with reliance damages, as specific performance is almost never purely financial, and reliance damages are generally a purely financial remedy. Reliance damages may be differentiated from restitution damages in the context of partial performance. Restitution damages may be invoked when the injured party confers a benefit upon a breaching party, and the breaching party does not fulfill their obligations with the benefit provided by the injured party. If reliance damages are to be invoked, the injured party has generally not conveyed a particular benefit to the breaching party; rather the injured party put themselves in a vulnerable situation in reliance on an action from a breaching party, and that breaching party allowed the injured party to suffer harm as a result of the breaching party's action or inaction. However, it must be reasonably foreseeable to the breaching party that the injured party would be harmed by the breaching party's behavior. If the injured party takes unreasonable action that irrationally relies on a behavior from the breaching party, a court may decide that an injured party may not warrant reliance damages from the breaching party. In US law, reliance damages are the type of damages awarded in promissory estoppel claims, although they can also be awarded in traditional contract breaches. This is appropriate because even if there is no bargain principle in the agreement, one party has relied on a promise and thus is damaged to the extent of their reliance. These damages must be proven with reasonable certainty. It is not enough that one party simply guess as to how much they are actually damaged. In a losing contract, reliance damages will be reduced because the aggrieved party cannot be put in a better position had the contract been performed. Here, the losses from the contract will be subtracted from the reliance damages. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

In a civil proceeding or criminal prosecution under the common law or under statute, a defendant may raise a defense in an effort to avert civil liability or criminal conviction. A defense is put forward by a party to defeat a suit or action brought against the party, and may be based on legal grounds or on factual claims. Besides contesting the accuracy of an allegation made against the defendant in the proceeding, the defendant may also make allegations against the prosecutor or plaintiff or raise a defense, arguing that, even if the allegations against the defendant are true, the defendant is nevertheless not liable. Acceptance of a defense by the court completely exonerates the defendant and not merely mitigates the liability. The defense phase of a trial occurs after the prosecution phase, that is, after the prosecution "rests". Other parts of the defense include the opening and closing arguments and the cross-examination during the prosecution phase. Since a defense is raised by the defendant in a direct attempt to avoid what would otherwise result in liability, the defendant typically holds the burden of proof. For example, a defendant who is charged with assault may claim provocation, but they would need to prove that the plaintiff had provoked the defendant. Common law defenses. In common law, a defendant may raise any of the numerous defenses to limit or avoid liability. These include: Lack of personal or subject matter jurisdiction of the court, such as diplomatic immunity. (In law, this is not a defense as such but an argument that the case should not be heard at all.) Failure to state a cause of action or other insufficiencies of pleading. Any of the affirmative defenses. Defenses conferred by statute – such as a statute of limitations or the statute of frauds. Ex turpi causa non oritur actio – the action against the defendant arises from an illegality. Volenti non fit injuria – consent by the victim or plaintiff. In pari delicto – both sides equally at fault. Act of God is an unforseable natural phenomenon which involves no human agency due directly to natural causes which cannot be foreseen. Necessity harm done to prevent a greater evil is not actionable even though the harm was caused intentionally. Mistake whether of fact or of law is no defense to action. The law permits use of reasonable force to protect one's person or property. If force is used for self-defense they will not be liable for harm. Unclean hands. In addition to defenses against prosecution and liability, a defendant may also raise a defense of justification – such as self-defense and defense of others or defense of property. In English law, one could raise the argument of a contramandatum, which was an argument that the plaintiff had no cause for complaint. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Insane delusion is the legal term of art in the common law tradition used to describe a false conception of reality that a testator of a will adheres to against all reason and evidence to the contrary. A will made by a testator suffering from an insane delusion that affects the provisions made in the will may fail in whole or in part. Only the portion of the will caused by the insane delusion fails, including potentially the entire will. Will contests often involve claims that the testator was suffering from an insane delusion. An insane delusion is distinct from testamentary capacity. A testator might be suffering from an insane delusion but otherwise possesses the requisite capacity to make a will. Similarly, an insane delusion is distinct from a mere mistake. If suffering from an insane delusion, a testator is not subject to change his or her mind regarding the delusion if presented with contrary evidence, whereas a mistake is capable of being corrected if the testator is told the truth. Additionally, while an insane delusion may cause portions of a will to fail, most courts will not reform or invalidate a will because of a mistake unless it was the result of fraud. Origin. The insane delusion concept was created in the 1826 British case Dew v Clark. In that case, a father believed that his daughter was "the devil incarnate" and disinherited her in his will of 1818. After her father's death, evidence presented by the daughter showed that she was well known for her good disposition and that her father had falsely told others that he lavished his daughter with praise and wealth. The probate court found that the father's mindset when he made the 1818 will was normal in all respects except toward his daughter. The court found that his thoughts about her, "did and could only proceed from, and be founded in, insanity," a "partial insanity" that only extended to his thoughts about his daughter and caused him to disinherit her. The court said that this delusion caused the will to fail. Examples. In the 1854 case Addington v Wilson, the Indiana Supreme Court held that a testator who disinherited his daughters because he believed them to be witches was not for that reason alone so insane as to deem him incapable of making a valid will. The court justified its decision by pointing to distinguished jurists and religious figures who affirmed the possibility of witchcraft; if these people's beliefs did not render them insane, neither did the testator's. In In re Robertson's Estate (1948), the Supreme Court of Oklahoma held that a testator who declared that he had "no children" and "no deceased children" in his will, when he actually had two living children, was suffering from an insane delusion, as the testator had "no rational basis whatsoever" to declare that he had no children. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Cohabitation is an arrangement where people who are not married, usually couples, live together. They are often involved in a romantic or sexually intimate relationship on a long-term or permanent basis. Such arrangements have become increasingly common in Western countries since the late 20th century, being led by changing social views, especially regarding marriage, gender roles and religion. More broadly, the term cohabitation can mean any number of people living together. To "cohabit", in a broad sense, means to "coexist". The origin of the term comes from the mid 16th century, from the Latin cohabitare, from co- 'together' + habitare 'dwell'. Social changes leading to increase. In Europe, the Scandinavian countries have been the first to start this leading trend, although many countries have since followed. Mediterranean Europe has traditionally been very conservative, with religion playing a strong role. Until the mid-1990s, cohabitation levels remained low in this region, but have since increased. During the past decades, in Western countries, there has been an increase in unmarried couples cohabiting. Historically, many Western countries have been influenced by Christian doctrines on sex, which opposes unmarried cohabitation. As social norms have changed, such beliefs have become less widely held by the population and some Christian denominations today view cohabitation as a precursor to marriage. Pope Francis has married a cohabiting couple who had children, while former Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams and the Archbishop of York John Sentamu have expressed tolerance of cohabitation. In recent decades high rates of participation of women in the workforce, and the widespread availability of highly effective long acting reversible contraceptives has led to women making individual choices over their reproduction with decreased reliance on male partners for financial stability. All these changes favored living arrangement alternatives to marriage. In Central and Eastern Europe, during the late 1980s and early 1990s, there were major political changes, such as the fall of Communist governments. These societies entered a new era of increased social freedom, less rigid rules, and less authoritarian governments. They interacted with Western Europe and some became members of the European Union. As a result, the patterns of family life have started to change: marriage rates have declined, and marriage was postponed to a later age. Cohabitation and births to unmarried mothers increased, and in some countries the increase was very quick. The deinstitutionalization of marriage refers to the weakening of the social and legal norms that regulate peoples' behavior in regard to marriage. The rise in cohabitation is part of other major social changes such as: higher divorce rate, older age at first marriage and childbearing, and more births outside marriage. Factors such as secularization, increased participation of women in the labor force, changing in the meaning of marriage, risk reduction, individualism, and changing views on sexuality have been cited as contributing to these social changes. There has also been a change in modern sexual ethics, with a focus on consent, rather than marital status (for example decriminalization of adultery and fornication; criminalization of marital rape), reflecting new concepts about the role and purpose of sexual interaction, and new conceptualizations of female sexuality and of self-determination. There have been objections against the legal and social regulation of female sexuality; with such regulations being often seen as violations of women's rights. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Domain names. The advent of the domain name system has led to attempts by trademark holders to enforce their rights over domain names that are similar or identical to their existing trademarks, particularly by seeking control over the domain names at issue. As with dilution protection, enforcing trademark rights over domain name owners involves protecting a trademark outside the obvious context of its consumer market, because domain names are global and not limited by goods or service. This conflict is easily resolved when the domain name owner actually uses the domain to compete with the trademark owner. Cybersquatting, however, does not involve competition. Instead, an unlicensed user registers a domain name identical to a trademark and offers to sell the domain to the trademark owner. Typosquatters—those registering common misspellings of trademarks as domain names—have also been targeted successfully in trademark infringement suits. "Gripe sites", on the other hand, tend to be protected as free speech, and are therefore more difficult to attack as trademark infringement. This clash of the new technology with pre-existing trademark rights resulted in several high-profile decisions as the courts of many countries tried to coherently address the issue (and not always successfully) within the framework of existing trademark law. As the website itself was not the product being purchased, there was no actual consumer confusion, and so initial interest confusion was a concept applied instead. Initial interest confusion refers to customer confusion that creates an initial interest in a competitor's "product" (in the online context, another party's website). Even though initial interest confusion is dispelled by the time any actual sales occur, it allows a trademark infringer to capitalize on the goodwill associated with the original mark. Several cases have wrestled with the concept of initial interest confusion. In Brookfield Communications, Incorporated v West Coast Entertainment Corporation the court found initial interest confusion could occur when a competitor's trademarked terms were used in the HTML metatags of a website, resulting in that site appearing in the search results when a user searches on the trademarked term. In Playboy Netscape, the court found initial interest confusion when users typed in Playboy's trademarks into a search engine, resulting in the display of search results alongside unlabeled banner ads, triggered by keywords that included Playboy's marks, that would take users to Playboy's competitors. Though users might ultimately realize upon clicking on the banner ads that they were not Playboy-affiliated, the court found that the competitor advertisers could have gained customers by appropriating Playboy's goodwill since users may be perfectly happy to browse the competitor's site instead of returning to the search results to find the Playboy sites. In Lamparello v Falwell, however, the court clarified that a finding of initial interest confusion is contingent on financial profit from said confusion, such that, if a domain name confusingly similar to a registered trademark is used for a non-trademark related website, the site owner will not be found to have infringed where they do not seek to capitalize on the mark's goodwill for their own commercial enterprises. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Incidental damages. Incidental damages refers to the type of legal damages that are reasonably associated with, or related to, actual damages. In American commercial law, incidental damages are a seller's commercially reasonable expenses incurred in stopping delivery or in transporting and caring for goods after a buyer's breach of contract, (UCC Sec. 2-710) or a buyer's expenses reasonably incurred, for example, searching for and obtaining substitute goods. (UCC Sec. 2-715(1)). Consequential damages. Consequential damages, otherwise known as special damages, are damages that can be proven to have occurred because of the failure of one party to meet a contractual obligation, a breach of contract. From a legal standpoint, an enforceable contract is present when it is: expressed by a valid offer and acceptance, has adequate consideration, mutual assent, capacity, and legality. Consequential damages go beyond the contract itself and into the actions that arise from the failure to fulfill. The type of claim giving rise to the damages, such as whether it is a breach of contract action or tort claim, can affect the rules or calculations associated with a given type of damages. For example, consequential damages are a potential type of expectation damages that arise in contract law. When a contract is breached, the recognized remedy for an owner is recovery of damages that result directly from the breach (also known as "compensatory damages"). Damages may include the cost to repair or complete the work in accordance with the contract documents, or the value of lost or damaged work. In addition to the compensatory damage, an owner can also seek for consequential damages (sometimes referred to as "indirect" or "special" damages), which include loss of product and loss of profit or revenue. This may be recovered if it is determined such damages were reasonably foreseeable or "within the contemplation of the parties" at the time of contract formation. This is a factual determination that could lead to the contractor's liability for an enormous loss. For example, the cost to complete unfinished work on time may pale in comparison to the loss of operating revenue an owner might claim as a result of late completion. In order to seek consequential damages, a party who has suffered physical injury, property damage, or financial loss needs to perform a duty to mitigate damages, which means that they have an obligation to reduce or minimize the effect and any losses resulting from the injury. The degree of proof required for the consequential damages is also higher than for the direct damages. Consequential damages must also be pled with greater specificity. The plaintiff has it on their burden to prove that the damages occurred are not only the proximate consequence of the breach, but also that they were "reasonably foreseeable" or within the "contemplation of the parties" when the parties agreed to the terms of the contract. The logic for proving foreseeability is that a party who can foresee the consequences of a breach of a contract can modify the contract price accordingly to compensate for the risk that is assumed. Further, in order to recover damages caused by a breach, the non-breaching party must act reasonably and timely to mitigate its damages. The Supreme Court of the United States has held in United States v 50 Acres of Land that consequential damages are not available in the U.S. Federal takings. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Economics. Economics can be both a tool of the internal and external subversive. For the external subversive, simply cutting off credit can cause severe economic problems for a country. An example of this is the United States' relations with Chile in the early 1970s. In an attempt to get Salvador Allende removed from office, the United States tried to weaken the Chilean economy. Chile received little foreign investments and the loss of credit prevented Chile from purchasing vital imports. Economic pressure of this kind prevents an economy from functioning and reduces a country's standard of living. If the reduction is too great, the people may become willing to support a change in the government's leadership. The main objective of economic pressures is to make it difficult for the country to fulfill its basic obligations to the citizenry either by cutting off trade or by depriving it of resources. The internal subversive can also use economics to put pressure on the government through use of the strike. An example of this is the Chilean Truckers’ Strike during the 1970s. The strike prevented the transport of food staples and forced nearly 50% of the national economy to cease production. Activities of these kinds create human, economic, and political problems that, if not addressed, can challenge the competency of the government. Agitation and civil unrest. As defined by Laurence Beilenson, agitation is "subversive propaganda by action such as mass demonstrations or the political strike, that is, a strike not intended to benefit the union or workers in the ordinary sense, but intended instead against the government." Furthermore, propaganda and agitation, even when they are legal forms of freedom of speech, press, and assembly can still be classified as subversive activity. These tools further demonstrate the need to determine intent of those taking action to identify subversive activities. Civil unrest creates many of the problems that an insurgency campaign does. First of all it is an affront to government authority, and if the government is unable to quell the unrest it leads to an erosion of state power. This loss of power stems from the people's lack of trust in the government to maintain law and order. In turn, the people begin to question whether or not new leadership is needed. Discrediting, disarming, and demoralizing the government is the goal of these activities and the cause of the government's loss of power. Civil unrest depletes resources as the government is forced to spend more money on additional police. Additionally, civil unrest may be used to provoke a response from the government. In the 1940s, during strikes against the Marshall Plan, communists in France would "deliberately provoke the police and gendarmerie into acts of repressive violence in order to exploit the resulting 'martyrs to the cause' for propaganda purposes." These martyrs and subsequent propaganda can be useful in turning political and social groups against each other. The less violent forms of unrest, "such as worker absenteeism, passive resistance, boycotts, and deliberate attempts to cripple government agencies by 'overloading the system' with false reports, can have powerfully disruptive effects, both economically and politically." --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

In law, fraud is intentional deception to secure unfair or unlawful gain, or to deprive a victim of a legal right. Fraud can violate civil law (for example, a fraud victim may sue the fraud perpetrator to avoid the fraud or recover monetary compensation) or criminal law (for example, a fraud perpetrator may be prosecuted and imprisoned by governmental authorities), or it may cause no loss of money, property, or legal right but still be an element of another civil or criminal wrong. The purpose of fraud may be monetary gain or other benefits, for example by obtaining a passport, travel document, or driver's license, or mortgage fraud, where the perpetrator may attempt to qualify for a mortgage by way of false statements. Internal fraud, also known as "insider fraud", is fraud committed or attempted by someone within an organization such as an employee. A hoax is a distinct concept that involves deliberate deception without the intention of gain or of materially damaging or depriving a victim. As a civil wrong. In common law jurisdictions, as a civil wrong, fraud is a tort. While the precise definitions and requirements of proof vary among jurisdictions, the requisite elements of fraud as a tort generally are the intentional misrepresentation or concealment of an important fact upon which the victim is meant to rely, and in fact does rely, to the harm of the victim. Proving fraud in a court of law is often said to be difficult as the intention to defraud is the key element in question. As such, proving fraud comes with a "greater evidentiary burden than other civil claims". This difficulty is exacerbated by the fact that some jurisdictions require the victim to prove fraud by clear and convincing evidence. The remedies for fraud may include rescission (for example, reversal) of a fraudulently obtained agreement or transaction, the recovery of a monetary award to compensate for the harm caused, punitive damages to punish or deter the misconduct, and possibly others. In cases of a fraudulently induced contract, fraud may serve as a defense in a civil action for breach of contract or specific performance of contract. Similarly, fraud may serve as a basis for a court to invoke its equitable jurisdiction. As a criminal offense. In common law jurisdictions, as a criminal offense, fraud takes many different forms, some general (for example, theft by false pretense) and some specific to particular categories of victims or misconduct (for example, bank fraud, insurance fraud, forgery). The elements of fraud as a crime similarly vary. The requisite elements of perhaps the most general form of criminal fraud, theft by false pretense, are the intentional deception of a victim by false representation or pretense with the intent of persuading the victim to part with property and with the victim parting with property in reliance on the representation or pretense and with the perpetrator intending to keep the property from the victim. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

The type, functions, and characteristics of marriage vary from culture to culture, and can change over time. In general there are two types: civil marriage and religious marriage, and typically marriages employ a combination of both (religious marriages must often be licensed and recognized by the state, and conversely civil marriages, while not sanctioned under religious law, are nevertheless respected). Marriages between people of differing religions are called interfaith marriages, while marital conversion, a more controversial concept than interfaith marriage, refers to the religious conversion of one partner to the other's religion for the sake of satisfying a religious requirement. Americas and Europeb. In the Americas and Europe, in the 21st century, legally recognized marriages are formally presumed to be monogamous (although some pockets of society accept polygamy socially, if not legally, and some couples choose to enter into open marriages). In these countries, divorce is relatively simple and socially accepted. In the West, the prevailing view toward marriage today is that it is based on a legal covenant recognizing emotional attachment between the partners and entered into voluntarily. In the West, marriage has evolved from a life-time covenant that can only be broken by fault or death to a contract that can be broken by either party at will. Other shifts in Western marriage since World War I include: There emerged a preference for maternal custody of children after divorce, as custody was more often settled based on the best interests of the child, rather than strictly awarding custody to the parent of greater financial means. Both spouses have a formal duty of spousal support in the event of divorce (no longer just the husband). Out of wedlock children have the same rights of support as legitimate children. In most countries, rape within marriage is illegal and can be punished. Spouses may no longer physically abuse their partners and women retain their legal rights upon marriage. In some jurisdictions, property acquired since marriage is not owned by the title-holder. This property is considered marital and to be divided among the spouses by community property law or equitable distribution via the courts. Marriages are more likely to be a product of mutual love, rather than economic necessity or a formal arrangement among families. Remaining single by choice is increasingly viewed as socially acceptable and there is less pressure on young couples to marry. Marriage is no longer obligatory. Interracial marriage is no longer forbidden. Same-race marriage was uniquely illegal in Paraguay in its early history. Same-sex marriage and civil unions are legal in some countries. Asia and Africa. Key facts concerning the marriage law in Africa and Asia: Marital rape is legal in most parts Africa and Asia alike. Child marriage is legal in most parts of Africa and very few parts of Asia alike. Arranged marriage is prevalent in many parts of Africa and Asia alike, especially in rural regions. Same-sex marriage is illegal in most parts of Africa and Asia alike, with the exception of South Africa, Taiwan and some dependent territories. Polygamy is legal in many parts of Africa and Asia, but tends to be illegal in most Communist countries and legal in most Muslim countries. Divorce is legal in all parts of Africa and Asia (except in the Philippines), but wives seeking divorce have fewer legal rights than husbands in Muslim countries than in Communist countries. Dowries are a traditional aspect of marriage customs in most rural regions of Africa and Asia alike. Some societies permit polygamy, in which a man could have multiple wives; even in such societies however, most men have only one. In such societies, having multiple wives is generally considered a sign of wealth and power. The status of multiple wives has varied from one society to another. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

The extent to which a trademark owner may prevent unauthorized use of trademarks that are the same as or similar to its trademark depends on various factors such as whether its trademark is registered, the similarity of the trademarks involved, the similarity of the products or services involved, and whether the owner's trademark is well known or, under U.S. law relating to trademark dilution, famous. If a trademark has not been registered, some jurisdictions (especially Common Law countries) offer protection for the business reputation or goodwill which attaches to unregistered trademarks through the tort of passing off. Passing off may provide a remedy in a scenario where a business has been trading under an unregistered trademark for many years, and a rival business starts using the same or a similar mark. If a trademark has been registered, then it is much easier for the trademark owner to demonstrate its trademark rights and to enforce these rights through an infringement action. Unauthorized use of a registered trademark need not be intentional for infringement to occur, although damages in an infringement lawsuit will generally be greater if there was an intention to deceive. For trademarks that are considered to be well known, infringing use may occur where the use occurs about products or services which are not the same as or similar to the products or services about which the owner's mark is registered. A growing area of law relating to the enforcement of trademark rights is secondary liability, which allows for the imputation of liability to one who has not acted directly to infringe a trademark but whose legal responsibility may arise under the doctrines of either contributory or vicarious liability. Limits and defenses to claims of infringement. Trademarks are subject to various defenses, such as abandonment, limitations on geographic scope, and fair use. In the United States, the fair use defense protects many of the interests in free expression related to those protected by the First Amendment. Fair use may be asserted on two grounds, either that the alleged infringer is using the mark to describe accurately an aspect of its products, or that the alleged infringer is using the mark to identify the mark owner. One of the most visible proofs that trademarks provide a limited right in the U.S. comes from the comparative advertising that is seen throughout U.S. media. An example of the first type is that although Maytag owns the trademark "Whisper Quiet" for its dishwashers, makers of other products may describe their goods as being "whisper quiet" so long as these products do not fall under the same category of goods the trademark is protected under. An example of the second type is that Audi can run advertisements saying that a trade publication has rated an Audi model higher than a BMW model since they are only using "BMW" to identify the competitor. In a related sense, an auto mechanic can truthfully advertise that he services Volkswagens, and a former Playboy Playmate of the Year can identify herself as such on her website. Wrongful or groundless threats of infringement. Various jurisdictions have laws that are designed to prevent trademark owners from making wrongful threats of a trademark infringement action against other parties. These laws are intended to prevent large or powerful companies from intimidating or harassing smaller companies. Where one party makes a threat to sue another for trademark infringement, but does not have a genuine basis or intention to carry out that threat, or does not carry out the threat at all within a certain period, the threat may itself become a basis for legal action. In this situation, the party receiving such a threat may seek from the Court a declaratory judgment; also known as a declaratory ruling. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Punitive damages, or exemplary damages, are damages assessed in order to punish the defendant for outrageous conduct and or to reform or deter the defendant and others from engaging in conduct similar to that which formed the basis of the lawsuit. Although the purpose of punitive damages is not to compensate the plaintiff, the plaintiff will receive all or some of the punitive damages in award. Punitive damages are often awarded if compensatory damages are deemed an inadequate remedy. The court may impose them to prevent undercompensation of plaintiffs and to allow redress for undetectable torts and taking some strain away from the criminal justice system. Punitive damages are most important for violations of the law that are hard to detect. However, punitive damages awarded under court systems that recognize them may be difficult to enforce in jurisdictions that do not recognize them. For example, punitive damages awarded to one party in a US case would be difficult to get recognition for in a European court in which punitive damages are most likely to be considered to violate ordre public. Because they are usually paid in excess of the plaintiff's provable injuries, punitive damages are awarded only in special cases, usually under tort law, if the defendant's conduct was egregiously insidious. Punitive damages cannot generally be awarded in contract disputes. The main exception is in insurance bad faith cases in the US if the insurer's breach of contract is alleged to be so egregious as to amount to a breach of the "implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing", and is therefore considered to be a tort cause of action eligible for punitive damages (in excess of the value of the insurance policy). --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Subversion (from Latin subvertere 'overthrow') refers to a process by which the values and principles of a system in place are contradicted or reversed in an attempt to transform the established social order and its structures of power, authority, hierarchy, and social norms. Subversion can be described as an attack on the public morale and, "the will to resist intervention are the products of combined political and social or class loyalties which are usually attached to national symbols. Following penetration, and parallel with the forced disintegration of political and social institutions of the state, these tendencies may be detached and transferred to the political or ideological cause of the aggressor". Subversion is used as a tool to achieve political goals because it generally carries less risk, cost, and difficulty as opposed to open belligerency. Furthermore, it is a relatively cheap form of warfare that does not require large amounts of training. A subversive is something or someone carrying the potential for some degree of subversion. In this context, a "subversive" is sometimes called a "traitor" with respect to (and usually by) the government in power. Subversion, however, is also often a goal of comedians, artists and people in those careers. In this case, being subversive can mean questioning, poking fun at, and undermining the established order in general. Terrorist groups generally do not employ subversion as a tool to achieve their goals. Subversion is a manpower-intensive strategy and many groups lack the manpower and political and social connections to carry out subversive activities. However, actions taken by terrorists may have a subversive effect on society. Subversion can imply the use of insidious, dishonest, monetary, or violent methods to bring about such change. This is in contrast to protest, a coup d'état, or working through traditional means in a political system to bring about change. Furthermore, external subversion is where, "the aggressor state attempts to recruit and assist indigenous political and military actors to overthrow their government by coup d’état". If subversion fails in its goal of bringing about a coup it is possible that the actors and actions of the subversive group could transition to insurrection, insurgency, and or guerilla warfare. The word is present in all languages of Latin origin, originally applying to such events as the military defeat of a city. As early as the 14th century, it was being used in the English language with reference to laws, and in the 15th century came to be used with respect to the realm. The term has taken over from 'sedition' as the name for illicit rebellion, though the connotations of the two words are rather different; sedition suggesting overt attacks on institutions, subversion something much more surreptitious, such as eroding the basis of belief in the status quo or setting people against each other. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Legal malpractice in estate planning. Lawsuits against estate planning attorneys have increased in recent years. Legal malpractice in trusts and estates is now considered to have the highest risk of exposure, representing 12% of all legal malpractice claims. Due to changes in privity laws, many states allow third-party beneficiaries to bring a lawsuit against an attorney who executed a will that is later deemed to be a product of undue influence. Experienced estate attorneys tend to be vigilant of "red flags" indicative of undue influence during the drafting and execution of a will. Because a will is the most important document most individuals sign in their lives, and it affects property rights for all time, the process should be taken seriously. Many attorneys incorrectly assume that estate planning is a simple area of law. Some less-informed attorneys believe estate planning to be a simple, fast, and easy way to make a quick buck, this could not be farther from the truth. An attorney involved in estate planning should exercise diligence and thoroughly document their work in the event they find themselves exposed to a malpractice suit. Ignoring indications of UI by the estate planning attorney can put them in a precarious position of needing to explain why they redirected a testator's estate while their client was unduly influenced. Presumption. Because of the secrecy and tactics leveraged by an influencer, direct evidence of wrongdoing is often impossible for the contestant of a will to produce. Access to the individual is typically controlled by the influencer so that friends and family are unable to observe the perpetrator engaging in manipulation, thus a challenger is often unable to provide direct evidence. In an effort to address this substantial power distinction, many states allow for the burden of proof to be shifted to the alleged influencer if certain requirements are satisfied. Jurisdictions vary as to the requirements, but in general, the burden is shifted when the combination of a confidential or fiduciary relationship with the donor and suspicious circumstances are found. Such circumstances include: Old age and weakened physical or mental condition of the testator. Lack of consideration of the bequest. Unnatural or unjust disposition of the property. Participation of the beneficiary in procuring the gift. Domination or control over the donor by the beneficiary. Secrecy, concealment, or failure to disclose the gift. Once shifted, the proponent of the contested will is tasked with rebutting the presumption. The alleged influencer is required to prove that the testator made the will of their own volition, and was not under any influence at the time it was executed. History. Undue influence originated from English common-law in a doctrine from 1617. Chancellor Bacon found that a woman who "worked on the simplicity and weakness" of an elderly man was guilty of undue influence. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Criticisms. There are several criticisms of class actions. The preamble to the Class Action Fairness Act stated that some abusive class actions harmed class members with legitimate claims and defendants that have acted responsibly, adversely affected interstate commerce, and undermined public respect for the country's judicial system. Class members often receive little or no benefit from class actions. Examples cited for this include large fees for the attorneys, while leaving class members with coupons or other awards of little or no value; unjustified awards are made to certain plaintiffs at the expense of other class members; and confusing notices are published that prevent class members from being able to fully understand and effectively exercise their rights. For example, in the United States, class lawsuits sometimes bind all class members with a low settlement. These "coupon settlements" (which usually allow the plaintiffs to receive a small benefit such as a small check or a coupon for future services or products with the defendant company) are a way for a defendant to forestall major liability by precluding many people from litigating their claims separately, to recover reasonable compensation for the damages. However, existing law requires judicial approval of all class-action settlements, and in most cases, class members are given a chance to opt out of class settlement, though class members, despite opt-out notices, may be unaware of their right to opt-out because they did not receive the notice, did not read it or did not understand it. The Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 addresses these concerns. An independent expert may scrutinize coupon settlements before judicial approval in order to ensure that the settlement will be of value to the class members. Further, if the action provides for settlement in coupons, "the portion of any attorney's fee awarded to class counsel that is attributable to the award of the coupons shall be based on the value to class members of the coupons that are redeemed". Ethics. Class action cases present significant ethical challenges. Defendants can hold reverse auctions and any of several parties can engage in collusive settlement discussions. Subclasses may have interests that diverge greatly from the class but may be treated the same. Proposed settlements could offer some groups (such as former customers) much greater benefits than others. In one paper presented at an ABA conference on class actions in 2007, authors commented that "competing cases can also provide opportunities for collusive settlement discussions and reverse auctions by defendants anxious to resolve their new exposure at the most economic cost". --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Terminology. Terms such as "mark", "brand" and "logo" are sometimes used interchangeably with "trademark". "Trademark", however, also includes any device, brand, label, name, signature, word, letter, numerical, shape of goods, packaging, color or combination of colors, smell, sound, movement or any combination thereof which is capable of distinguishing goods and services of one business from those of others. It must be capable of graphical representation and must be applied to goods or services for which it is registered. Specialized types of trademark include certification marks, collective trademarks and defensive trademarks. A trademark that is popularly used to describe a product or service (rather than to distinguish the product or services from those of third parties) is sometimes known as a genericized trademark. If such a mark becomes synonymous with that product or service to the extent that the trademark owner can no longer enforce its proprietary rights, the mark becomes generic. A "trademark look" is an informal term for a characteristic look for a performer or character of some sort. It is usually not legally trademark protected and the term is not used in the trademark law. Registration. Some law considers a trademark to be a form of property. Proprietary rights about a trademark may be established through actual use of that trademark in the marketplace or through registration of the mark with the relevant trademarks office (or "trademarks registry") of a particular jurisdiction. In some jurisdictions, trademark rights can be established through either or both means. Certain jurisdictions generally do not recognize trademarks rights arising merely through use. If trademark owners do not hold registrations for their marks in such jurisdictions, the extent to which they will be able to enforce their rights through trademark infringement proceedings may be limited. In cases of dispute, this disparity of rights is often referred to as "first to file" (for example, register) as opposed to "first to use." Some countries, such as Germany, offer a limited number of common law rights for unregistered marks, where to gain protection the goods or services must first occupy a highly significant position in the marketplace — where this could be 40% or more market share for sales in the particular class of goods or services. In the United States, the registration process includes several steps. First, the trademark owner applies with the United States Patent and TradeMark Office to register the trademark. About three months after it is filed, the application is reviewed by an examining attorney at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. The examining attorney checks for compliance with the rules of the Trademark Manual of Examination Procedure. This review includes procedural matters such as making sure the applicant's goods or services are identified properly. It also includes more substantive matters such as making sure the applicant's mark is not merely descriptive or likely to be confused with a pre-existing applied-for or registered mark. If the application runs afoul of any requirement, the examining attorney will issue an office action requiring the applicant to address certain issues or refusals before registration of the mark. If the examining attorney approves the application, it will be "published for opposition." During this 30-day period, third parties who may be affected by the registration of the trademark may step forward to file an opposition proceeding to stop the registration of the mark. If an opposition proceeding is filed it institutes a case before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board to determine both the validity of the grounds for the opposition as well as the ability of the applicant to register the mark at issue. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Constructive trust. Constructive trust is enforced in situations where the possession of a property by the defendant unjustly enriches him or her, and therefore the court decides to grant the ownership of the property to the plaintiff. Equitable lien. Equitable lien is applicable when the defendant used unjust funds obtained from the plaintiff to make improvements to his or her property. By granting the plaintiff a security interest in the property of the defendant, it guards the right of the plaintiff to have the funds returned from the defendant. Subrogation. In a subrogation case, the property that belongs to the plaintiff from a legal standpoint is used by the defendant to repay the debt to a third party. Subrogation entitles the plaintiff to the rights as the third party against the defendant. Specific performance. Specific performance refers to the court compelling the defendant to perform certain actions. This type of equitable remedy is limited in scope because in contract laws for example, issuing specific performance would require the property that gives rise to the lawsuit to be unique, or that it is more practical for the defendant to compensate the plaintiff by paying for compensatory damages. Reformation. Reformation, or referred to as rectification, is when the court practices remedies by correcting the writings of a contract. Under two circumstances, reformation applies either when (1) the writing does not reflect the agreement made between the parties, or (2) one party signed the contract in the first place because of manipulation by fraud planned and executed by the other party. Equitable rescission. Equitable rescission gives the innocent plaintiff the right to undo or rescind a contract when the plaintiff entered the contract as a result of fraud, misrepresentation, etc., or when the contract has been breached by the other party. To restore the situation to what it was before the contract, both parties need to return what they have received from the exchange. Declaratory remedies. Declaratory remedies, or declaratory judgment, do not belong to the category of damages or equities. They are legal determinations made by the court to address ambiguity or disputes without sanctioning an action or practice against the parties involved. Declaratory remedies serve to affirm the validity of the claims and requests made by the plaintiff, accompanied by injunction in selective cases at the discretion of judges or juries. Declaratory remedies are a component of preventive adjudication because in cases that demand only declaration, no actual harm or loss has been incurred by the plaintiff. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Sedition is overt conduct, such as speech and organization, that tends toward rebellion against the established order. Sedition often includes subversion of a constitution and incitement of discontent toward, or insurrection against, established authority. Sedition may include any commotion, though not aimed at direct and open violence against the laws. Seditious words in writing are seditious libel. A seditionist is one who engages in or promotes the interest of sedition. Because sedition is overt, it is typically not considered a subversive act, and the overt acts that may be prosecutable under sedition laws vary from one legal code to another. Roman origin. Seditio (lit. 'going apart') was the offense, in the later Roman Republic, of collective disobedience to a magistrate, including both military mutiny and civilian mob action. Leading or instigating seditio was punishable by death. Civil seditio became frequent during the political crisis of the first century BCE, as populist politicians sought to check the privileged classes by appealing to public assemblies. The Julio-Claudian emperors addressed this situation by abolishing elections and other duties of the assemblies. Under Tiberius the crime of seditio was subsumed in the law of majestas, which prohibited any utterance against the dignity of the emperor. Seditio has often been proposed as the offense for which Jesus was crucified, as described in Luke 23:14: "inciting the people to rebellion" (Greek: ἀποστρέφοντα τὸν λαόν, "leading the people astray"). History in common law jurisdictions. The term sedition in its modern meaning first appeared in the Elizabethan Era (1590) as the "notion of inciting by words or writings disaffection towards the state or constituted authority". The law developed in the Court of Star Chamber, relying on longstanding scandalum magnatum statutes and a broad repressive act of Mary the 1st against literature that contained "the encouraging, stirring or moving of any insurrection". That seditious statements were true was no defense, but rather an aggravating factor, since true statements were all the more potent. After the Star Chamber's dissolution, enforcement continued in the courts of assize and quarter sessions. Three classes of seditious offense were commonly charged: "seditious words" manifested by speaking, "seditious libel" by writing or publishing, and "seditious conspiracy" by active plotting. Although England adopted the name of the offense from Roman-derived civil law, it did not rely on the jurisprudence. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Undue influence (UI) is a psychological process by which a person's free will and judgment is supplanted by that of another. It is a legal term and the strict definition varies by jurisdiction. Generally speaking, it is a means by which a person gains control over their victims' decision making through manipulation tactics and unfair pressure, typically for financial gain. Historically, UI has been poorly understood, even in some legal circles. Undue influence is typically perpetrated by a person who is trusted by the victim and is dependent on them for emotional and physical needs. Caregivers are often found to have unduly influenced their patients, however, anyone in a position of trust and authority over the victim (for example, fiduciary) may be guilty. This includes the victims' attorney, accountant, nursing home attendant, or even children. UI is a process, not a single event. A manipulator may spend weeks, months, or even years before successfully unduly-influencing their victim. Anyone is susceptible to UI, but the elderly are particularly vulnerable. Perpetrators of UI operate in shadow, enacting their manipulation behind closed doors where there are no witnesses. A person being unduly influenced may become withdrawn, depressive and passive. Physical signs of abuse may include unexplained bruising, scratches, and or broken bones. Other signs may include missing or broken dentures, prescription eyeglasses, hearing aids or other assistive devices. A distinction is made between the nature of capacity and undue influence. In assessing capacity, the practitioner evaluates an individual's ability to competently perform tasks (for example, execute a will or give medical consent). These assessments give insight to the functioning of the cognitive capabilities at that moment in time. Conversely, screening for undue influence is focused on the process of events which occur over an extended period. To determine whether another person is leveraging unfair tactics on the victim, an assessment specific to undue influence is required. Undue influence occurs in various circumstances including, but not limited to domestic violence, hostage situations, cults, prisoners of war, and dictatorships. The common theme among these situations is the aspect of psychological manipulation. Traumatic bonding may occur between the victim and influencer, as a result, the victim may even defend the perpetrator. The effectiveness of cult tactics (for example, Love bombing) on young and healthy individuals illustrates that anyone, regardless of mental status, is a potential victim of UI under certain circumstances. Elderly Americans are living longer, and with this increased life expectancy, the prevalence of cognitive disorders associated with advanced age has also increased. A significant concentration of wealth is controlled by this aging demographic making them a potential target for exploitation. Modern families are becoming more complex and dispersed. Given these factors, the number of will contests involving undue influence is expected to increase. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

A class action, also known as a class-action lawsuit, class suit, or representative action, is a type of lawsuit where one of the parties is a group of people who are represented collectively by a member or members of that group. The class action originated in the United States and is still predominantly an American phenomenon, but Canada, as well as several European countries with civil law, have made changes in recent years to allow consumer organizations to bring claims on behalf of consumers. Description. In a typical class action, a plaintiff sues a defendant or a number of defendants on behalf of a group, or class, of absent parties. This differs from a traditional lawsuit, where one party sues another party, and all of the parties are present in court. Although standards differ between states and countries, class actions are most common where the allegations usually involve at least 40 people who the same defendant has injured in the same way. Instead of each damaged person bringing one's own lawsuit, the class action allows all the claims of all class members—whether they know they have been damaged or not—to be resolved in a single proceeding through the efforts of the representative plaintiff(s) and appointed class counsel. History. England and the United Kingdom. The antecedent of the class action was what modern observers call "group litigation," which appears to have been quite common in medieval England from about 1200 onward.  These lawsuits involved groups of people either suing or being sued in actions at common law. These groups were usually based on existing societal structures like villages, towns, parishes, and guilds. Unlike modern courts, the medieval English courts did not question the right of the actual plaintiffs to sue on behalf of a group or a few representatives to defend an entire group. From 1400 to 1700, group litigation gradually switched from being the norm in England to the exception.  The development of the concept of the corporation led to the wealthy supporters of the corporate form becoming suspicious of all unincorporated legal entities, which in turn led to the modern concept of the unincorporated or voluntary association.  The tumultuous history of the Wars of the Roses and then the Star Chamber resulted in periods during which the common law courts were frequently paralyzed, and out of the confusion the Court of Chancery emerged with exclusive jurisdiction over group litigation. By 1850, Parliament had enacted several statutes on a case-by-case basis to deal with issues regularly faced by certain types of organizations, like joint-stock companies, and with the impetus for most types of group litigation removed, it went into a steep decline in English jurisprudence from which it never recovered.  It was further weakened by the fact that equity pleading, in general, was falling into disfavor, which culminated in the Judicature Acts of 1874 and 1875.  Group litigation was essentially dead in the United Kingdom after 1850. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

A trademark (also written trade mark or trade-mark) is a type of intellectual property consisting of a recognizable sign, design, or expression that identifies products or services from a particular source and distinguishes them from others. The trademark owner can be an individual, business organization, or any legal entity. A trademark may be located on a package, a label, a voucher, or on the product itself. Trademarks used to identify services are sometimes called service marks. In the past, The first legislative act concerning trademarks was passed in 1266 under the reign of Henry the 3rd of England requiring all bakers to use a distinctive mark for the bread they sold. The first modern trademark laws emerged in the late 19th century. In France, the first comprehensive trademark system in the world was passed into law in 1857. The Trade Marks Act 1938 of the United Kingdom changed the system, permitting registration based on "intent-to-use", creating an examination based process, and creating an application publication system. The 1938 Act, which served as a model for similar legislation elsewhere, contained other novel concepts such as "associated trademarks", a consent to use the system, a defensive mark system, and a non claiming right system. The symbols symbol) and the registered trademark symbol can be used to indicate trademarks; the latter is only for use by the owner of a trademark that has been registered. Usage. A trademark identifies the brand owner of a particular product, media, company, Movie or TV series, characters or service. Trademarks can be used by others under licensing agreements; for example, Bullyland obtained a license to produce Smurf figurines; the Lego Group purchased a license from Lucasfilm to be allowed to launch Lego Star Wars; and TT Toys Toys is a manufacturer of licensed ride-on replica cars for children. The unauthorized usage of trademarks by producing and trading counterfeit consumer goods is known as brand piracy. The owner of a trademark may pursue legal action against trademark infringement. Most countries require formal trademark registration as a precondition for pursuing this type of action. The United States, Canada, and other countries also recognize common law trademark rights, which means action can be taken to protect any unregistered trademark if it is in use. Still, common law trademarks offer to the holder, in general, less legal protection than registered trademarks. As the purpose of the trademark is to identify a particular source of the product, rather than the product itself, it is widespread legal advice that trademark owners should always use their trademarks as adjectives modifying a generic product name, and set off with capitalization or a distinctive typeface, as a guard against the trademark becoming the generic name of the product. Thus "LEGO bricks" rather than "some Lego" or "Legos". The name of the producer itself is a "trade name" rather than a trademark and can be used as a noun. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

A legal remedy, also referred to as judicial relief or a judicial remedy, is the means with which a court of law, usually in the exercise of civil law jurisdiction, enforces a right, imposes a penalty, or makes another court order to impose its will in order to compensate for the harm of a wrongful act inflicted upon an individual. In common law jurisdictions and mixed civil-common law jurisdictions, the law of remedies distinguishes between a legal remedy (for example a specific amount of monetary damages) and an equitable remedy (for example injunctive relief or specific performance). Another type of remedy available in these systems is declaratory relief, where a court determines the rights of the parties to action without awarding damages or ordering equitable relief. The type of legal remedies to be applied in specific cases depend on the nature of the wrongful act and its liability. In international human rights law, there is a right to an effective remedy. In the legal system of the United States, there exists a traditional form of judicial remedies that serve to combat juror biases caused by news coverage. The First Amendment of the United States forbids the government from censoring and restraining the freedom of expression, which allows the ever-expanding news media to influence the legal process. The entangled relationship between mass media and the legal system presents challenges to the Sixth Amendment that guarantees the rights of criminal defendants to receive fair trials. Trial-level remedies are in place to avoid pretrial publicity from affecting the fairness of a trial. To minimize the impacts of pretrial publicity, there are six kinds of judicial remedies at the disposal of judges: voir dire, change of venue, change of veniremen, continuance, admonition, sequestration. In English and American jurisprudence, there is a legal maxim (albeit one sometimes honored in the breach) that for every right, there is a remedy; where there is no remedy, there is no right. That is, lawmakers claim to provide appropriate remedies to protect rights. This legal maxim was first enunciated by William Blackstone: "It is a settled and invariable principle in the laws of England, that every right when with-held must have a remedy, and every injury its proper redress." In addition to the United Kingdom and the United States, legal remedy is a concept widely practiced in the legal system of a variety of countries, though approached differently. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Explanations for the 20th century increase in secessionism. According to University of California, Santa Barbara, political scientist Bridget L Coggins, there are four potential explanations in the academic literature for the drastic increase in state birth during the 20th century: Ethnonational mobilization – Ethnic minorities have been increasingly mobilized to pursue states of their own. Institutional empowerment – The growing inability of empires and ethnic federations to maintain colonies and member states. Relative strength – Increasingly powerful secessionist movements are more likely to achieve statehood. Negotiated consent – Home states and the international community increasingly consent to secessionist demands. Other scholars have linked secession to resource discoveries and extraction. David B. Carter, H. E. Goemans and Ryan Griffiths find that border changes among states tend to conform to borders for previous administrative units. Several scholars have argued that changes in the international system have made it easier to survive and prosper as a small state. Tanisha Fazal and Ryan Griffiths link increased numbers of secessions to an international system that is more favorable for new states. For example, new states can obtain assistance from international organizations, such as the International Monetary Fund, World Bank and the United Nations. Alberto Alesina and Enrico Spolaore argue that greater levels of free trade and peace have reduced the benefits of being part of a larger state, thus motivating nations within larger states to seek secession. Woodrow Wilson's proclamations on self-determination in 1918 created a surge in secessionist demands. Rights to secession. Most sovereign states do not recognize the right to self-determination through secession in their constitutions. Many expressly forbid it. However, there are several existing models of self-determination through greater autonomy and through secession. In liberal constitutional democracies the principle of majority rule has dictated whether a minority can secede. In the United States Abraham Lincoln acknowledged that secession might be possible through amending the United States Constitution. The Supreme Court in Texas v White held secession could occur "through revolution, or through consent of the States". The British Parliament in 1933 held that Western Australia could secede from the Commonwealth of Australia only upon vote of a majority of the country as a whole; the previous two-thirds majority vote for secession via referendum in Western Australia was insufficient. The Chinese Communist Party followed the Soviet Union in including the right of secession in its 1931 constitution in order to entice ethnic nationalities and Tibet into joining. However, the Party eliminated the right to secession in later years, and had anti-secession clause written into the Constitution before and after the founding of the People's Republic of China. The 1947 Constitution of the Union of Burma contained an express state right to secede from the union under a number of procedural conditions. It was eliminated in the 1974 constitution of the Socialist Republic of the Union of Burma (officially the "Union of Myanmar"). Burma still allows "local autonomy under central leadership". As of 1996, the constitutions of Austria, Ethiopia, France, and Saint Kitts and Nevis have express or implied rights to secession. Switzerland allows for the secession from current and the creation of new cantons. In the case of proposed Quebec separation from Canada, the Supreme Court of Canada in 1998 ruled that only both a clear majority of the province and a constitutional amendment confirmed by all participants in the Canadian federation could allow secession. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

In the common law tradition, testamentary capacity is the legal term of art used to describe a person's legal and mental ability to make or alter a valid will. This concept has also been called sound mind and memory or disposing mind and memory. Presumption of capacity. Adults are presumed to have the ability to make a will. Litigation about testamentary capacity typically revolves around charges that the testator, by virtue of senility, dementia, insanity, or other unsoundness of mind, lacked the mental capacity to make a will. In essence, the doctrine requires those who would challenge a validly executed will to demonstrate that the testator did not know the consequence of their conduct when they executed the will. Certain people, such as minors, are usually deemed to be conclusively incapable of making a will by the common law; however, minors who serve in the military are conceded the right to make a will by statute in many jurisdictions. In South Africa, however, one acquires testamentary capacity at the age of 16 years. Requirements. The requirements for testamentary capacity are minimal. Some courts have held that a person who lacks the capacity to make a contract can nevertheless make a valid will. While the wording of statutes or judicial rulings will vary from one jurisdiction to another, the test generally requires that the testator was aware of: The extent and value of their property. The persons who are the natural beneficiaries The disposition they are making How these elements relate to form an orderly plan of distribution of property. The legal test implies that a typical claimant in a will contest is a disgruntled heir who believes they should have received a larger share than they did under the will. Once the challenging party meets the burden of proof that the testator did not possess the capacity, the burden subsequently shifts to the party propounding the will to show by clear and convincing evidence that the testator did have the requisite capacity. Proof of testamentary capacity. Those who contest a will for lack of testamentary capacity must typically show that the decedent suffered from mental unsoundness that left them unable to remember family members or caused them to hold insane delusions about them. Dead Man's Statutes sometimes restrict evidence which can be admitted concerning transactions with the decedent. Lawyers for people whose testamentary capacity might be called into question often arrange for a will execution to be videotaped. On video, they ask the testator about his property and about his family, and go over the contents of the testator's will. The testamentary capacity matter is most frequently raised posthumously, when an aggrieved heir contests the will entered into probate. For this reason, in the absence of the ability to interview the testator directly, a forensic psychiatrist or forensic psychologist may evaluate a testator’s capacity by reviewing videotape of the drafting of the will, emails or letters, medical records, and other records. Along with resolving an examinee's testamentary capacity, a forensic specialist may observe for signs of undue influence, particularly susceptibility to undue influence. Even when a testator is found to have lacked testamentary capacity due to senility, loss of memory due to the aging process, infirmity or insanity, courts will sometimes rule that the testator had a "temporary period of lucidity" or a "lucid moment" at the time of the execution of the testamentary instrument. Such finding will validate a will that would otherwise be denied probate. A way to forestall a will contest would be to have a self-proving will, in which an affidavit of the witnesses to the will specifically swear or affirm that the will was prepared under the supervision of an attorney. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

A private attorney general is an informal term originating in common law jurisdictions for a private attorney who brings a lawsuit claiming it to be in the public interest, for example, benefiting the general public and not just the plaintiff, on behalf of a citizen or group of citizens. The attorney may, at the equitable discretion of the court, be entitled to recover attorney's fees if they prevail. The rationale behind this principle is to provide extra incentive to private attorneys to pursue suits that may be of benefit to society at large. Private attorney general suits are commonly, though not always, brought as class actions in jurisdictions that permit the certification of class action lawsuits. Origin. Historically in English common law, a writ of qui tam was a writ through which private individuals who assist a prosecution can receive for themselves all or part of the damages or financial penalties recovered by the government as a result of the prosecution. Its name is an abbreviation of the Latin phrase qui tam pro domino rege quam pro se ipso in hac parte sequitur, meaning " who sues in this matter for the king as well as for himself." While the writ fell into disuse in England and Wales following the Common Informers Act 1951, it remains current in the United States under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729, which allows a private individual, or "whistleblower" (or relator), with knowledge of past or present fraud committed against the federal government to bring suit on its behalf. This allowance and, in some cases, reliance on private individual litigation to enforce the law has also been referred to as a "bounty" system due to the private citizen's potential financial gain if the suit is successful. There are also qui tam provisions in 18 U.S.C. § 962 regarding arming vessels against friendly nations; 25 U.S.C. § 201 regarding violating Indian protection laws; 46 U.S.C. § 80103 regarding the removal of undersea treasure from the Florida coast to foreign nations; and 35 U.S.C. § 292 regarding false marking. However, in February 2011, the qui tam provision regarding false marking was held to be unconstitutional by a U.S. District Court, and, in September of that year, the enactment of the Leahy–Smith America Invents Act effectively removed qui tam remedies from § 292. Contemporary private attorney general lawsuits are an outgrowth of the rationale underlying the writ of qui tam that enabling private citizens to enforce the law will strengthen enforcement and contribute to the rule of law. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Within the U.S., trade secrets generally encompass a company's proprietary information that is not generally known to its competitors, and which provides the company with a competitive advantage. Although trade secrets law evolved under state common law, prior to 1974, the question of whether patent law preempted state trade secrets law had been unanswered. In 1974, the United States Supreme Court issued the landmark decision, Kewanee Oil Company v Bicron Corporation, which resolved the question in favor of allowing the states to freely develop their own trade secret laws. State law. In 1979, several U.S. states adopted the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA), which was further amended in 1985, with approximately 47 states having adopted some variation of it as the basis for trade secret law. Another significant development is the Economic Espionage Act (EEA) of 1996 (18 U.S.C. §§ 1831–1839), which makes the theft or misappropriation of a trade secret a federal crime. This law contains two provisions criminalizing two sorts of activity. 18 U.S.C. § 1831(a), criminalizes the theft of trade secrets to benefit foreign powers. 18 U.S.C. § 1832, criminalizes their theft for commercial or economic purposes. The statutory penalties are different for the two offenses. The EEA was extended in 2016 to allow companies to file civil suits in federal court. Federal law. On May 11, 2016, President Obama signed the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1839, which for the first time created a federal cause of action for misappropriation of trade secrets. The DTSA provides for both a private right of action for damages and injunction and a civil action for injunction brought by the Attorney General. The statute followed state laws on liability in significant part, defining trade secrets in the same way as the Uniform Trade Secrets Act as, "all forms and types of financial, business, scientific, technical, economic, or engineering information, including patterns, plans, compilations, program devices, formulas, designs, prototypes, methods, techniques, processes, procedures, programs, or codes, whether tangible or intangible, and whether or how stored, compiled, or memorialized physically, electronically, graphically, photographically, or in writing if (A) the owner thereof has taken reasonable measures to keep such information secret; and (B) the information derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable through proper means by, another person who can obtain economic value from the disclosure or use of the information." However, the law contains several important differences from prior law. Because it is a federal law, trade secret cases can be prosecuted in federal courts with concomitant procedural advantages. It provides for the unusual remedy of preliminary seizure of "property necessary to prevent the propagation or dissemination of the trade secret," 18 U.S.C. §1836. It provides for remedies to include royalties in appropriate cases and exemplary damages up to two times the actual damages in cases of "willful and malicious" appropriation, 18 U.S.C. §1836(b)(3). The DTSA also clarifies that a United States resident (including a company) can be liable for misappropriation that takes place outside the United States, and any person can be liable as long as an act in furtherance of the misappropriation takes place in the United States, 18 U.S.C. §1837. The DTSA provides the courts with broad injunctive powers. 18 U.S.C. §1836(b)(3). The DTSA does not preempt or supplant state laws, but provides an additional cause of action. Because states vary significantly in their approach to the "inevitable disclosure" doctrine, its use has limited, if any, application under the DTSA, 18 U.S.C.§1836(b)(3)(A). --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Some jurisdictions may commit certain types of dangerous sex offenders to state-run detention facilities following the completion of their sentence if that person has a "mental abnormality" or personality disorder that makes the person likely to engage in sexual offenses if not confined in a secure facility. In the United States, twenty states, the federal government, and the District of Columbia have a version of these commitment laws, which are referred to as "Sexually Violent Predator" (SVP) or "Sexually Dangerous Persons" laws. Generally speaking, SVP laws have three elements: (1) That the person has been convicted of a sexually violent offense (a term that is defined applicable statutes) (2) That the person suffers from a mental abnormality and or personality disorder, which causes him or her serious difficulty controlling his or her sexually violent behavior. (3) That this mental abnormality and or personality disorder makes the person likely to engage in predatory acts of sexual violence if not confined in a secure facility. A "mental abnormality" is a legal term that is not identical to a mental disorder, though experts generally refer to diagnoses contained in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) as evidence of a mental abnormality. In most cases, commitment as an SVP is indefinite; however, once a person is committed, the confining agency is constitutionally required to conduct periodic reviews of that person's mental condition. If the committed person's condition changes so he or she no longer meets commitment criteria, he or she must be released. In some circumstances, committed persons can be released to court-monitored conditional releases to less restrictive alternative placements (LRAs). --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Secession is the withdrawal of a group from a larger entity, especially a political entity, but also from any organization, union or military alliance. Some of the most famous and significant secessions have been: the Southern States seceding from the Union - which is one of the causes for the American Civil War, the former Soviet republics leaving the Soviet Union after its dissolution, Texas leaving Mexico during the Texas Revolution, Biafra leaving Nigeria and returning after losing the Nigerian Civil War, and Ireland leaving the United Kingdom. Threats of secession can be a strategy for achieving more limited goals. It is, therefore, a process, which commences once a group proclaims the act of secession (for example declaration of independence). A secession attempt might be violent or peaceful, but the goal is the creation of a new state or entity independent from the group or territory it seceded from. Secession theory. There is no consensus regarding the definition of political secession, and a lot of new political theory on the subject. The political philosophers of the rights and moral justification for secession began to develop as recently as the 1980s.American philosopher Allen Buchanan offered the first systematic account of the subject in the 1990s and contributed to the normative classification of the literature on secession. In his 1991 book Secession: The Morality of Political Divorce From Fort Sumter to Lithuania and Quebec, Buchanan outlined limited rights to secession under certain circumstances, mostly related to oppression by people of other ethnic or racial groups, and especially those previously conquered by other people. In his collection of essays from secession scholars, Secession, State, and Liberty, professor David Gordon challenges Buchanan, making a case that the moral status of the seceding state is unrelated to the issue of secession itself. According to the 2017 book Secession and Security by George Mason political scientist Ahsan Butt, states respond violently to secessionist movements if the potential state would pose a greater threat than a violent secessionist movement would. States perceive future war as likely with a potentially new state if the ethnic group driving the secessionist struggle has deep identity division with the central state, and if the regional neighborhood is violent and unstable. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

A will contest, in the law of property, is a formal objection raised against the validity of a will, based on the contention that the will does not reflect the actual intent of the testator (the party who made the will) or that the will is otherwise invalid. Will contests generally focus on the assertion that the testator lacked testamentary capacity, was operating under an insane delusion, or was subject to undue influence or fraud. A will may be challenged in its entirety or in part. Courts and legislation generally feel a strong obligation to uphold the final wishes of a testator, and, without compelling evidence to the contrary, "the law presumes that a will is valid and accurately reflects the wishes of the person who wrote it". A will may include an in terrorem clause, with language along the lines of "any person who contests this will shall forfeit his legacy", which operates to disinherit any person who challenges the validity of the will. Such no-contest clauses are permitted under the Uniform Probate Code, which most American states follow at least in part. However, since the clause is within the will itself, a successful challenge to the will renders the clause meaningless. Many states consider such clauses void as a matter of public policy or valid only if a will is contested without probable cause. This article mainly discusses American law and cases. Will contests are more common in the United States than in other countries. This prevalence of will contests in the U.S. is partly because the law gives people a large degree of freedom in disposing of their property and also because "a number of incentives for suing exist in American law outside of the merits of the litigation itself". Most other legal traditions enforce some type of forced heirship, requiring that a testator leave at least some assets to their family, particularly the spouse and children. Standing to contest will. Typically, standing in the United States to contest the validity of a will is limited to two classes of persons: Those who are named on the face of the will (any beneficiary); Those who would inherit from the testator if the will was invalid. For example, Monica makes a will leaving $5,000 each to her husband, Chandler; her brother, Ross; her neighbor, Joey and her best friend, Rachel. Chandler tells Monica that he will divorce her if she does not disown Ross, which would humiliate her. Later, Ross tells Monica (untruthfully) that Chandler is having an affair with Phoebe, which Monica believes. Distraught, Monica rewrites her will, disowning both Chandler and Ross. The attorney who drafts the will accidentally writes the gift to Rachel as $500 instead of $5,000 and also accidentally leaves Joey out entirely. Under such facts: Chandler can contest the will as the product of fraud in the inducement, because if the will is invalid, he will inherit Monica's property, as the surviving spouse. Ross can contest the will as the product of Chandler's undue influence, as Ross will inherit Monica's property if Chandler's behavior disqualifies Chandler from inheriting (however, many jurisdictions do not consider a threat of divorce to be undue influence). Rachel has standing to contest the will, as she is named in the document, but she will not be permitted to submit any evidence as to the mistake because it is not an ambiguous term. Instead, she will have to sue Monica's lawyer for legal malpractice to recover the difference. Finally, neither Joey nor Phoebe is someone who stands to inherit from Monica, nor is either named in the will, and so both are barred from contesting the will altogether. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Quasi-tort is a legal term that is sometimes used to describe unusual tort actions, on the basis of a legal doctrine that some legal duty exists which cannot be classified strictly as negligence in a personal duty resulting in a tort nor as a contractual duty resulting in a breach of contract, but rather some other kind of duty recognizable by the law. It has been used, for example, to describe a tort for strict liability arising out of product liability, although this is typically simply called a 'tort'. Although it is not to be found in most legal dictionaries, it has been used by some scholars such as Sri Lankan Lakshman Marasinghe. Lakshman proposes that the doctrine provides legal relief that falls outside tort or contract, but with some of the characteristics of tort or contract, as can be found in restitution (including unjust enrichment), equity (including unconscionable conduct), beneficiaries under a trust of the benefit of a promise, people protected by the valid assignment of promise, fiduciary duty, and contracts of insurance. In conflict of laws, the choice of law rules for tort are intended to select the lex causae by which to determine the nature and scope of the judicial remedy to claim damages for loss or damage suffered. History. The first attempts to establish a coherent choice of law rule for tort cases involving a foreign law element varied between favouring the lex fori (for example the law of the court) and the lex loci delicti commissi (for example the law of the place where the tort was committed). The public policy of territorial sovereignty was always the principal consideration. Hence, the forum courts claimed their right to apply their laws to determine whether any lawsuit initiated in their jurisdiction allowed a remedy. Equally, it is the commission of a tort that vests a right of action in a claimant and therefore, it should always be for the law of the place where that right was created to determine the extent of any remedy flowing from it. In the end, a compromise emerged where the lex loci delicti was the first point of reference but courts retained a discretion to substitute the lex fori if the foreign law was deemed unfair and other practical considerations pointed to the application of forum law. In the U.S., see the New York decision in Babcock v Jackson, (1963) for a discussion of the issues. This led to a debate in which state interests, rather than strict territorial connections, were suggested as the basis of a new test. In 1971, the American Law Institute produced the Second Conflicts Restatements and section 6 provides that the applicable law should be the one with the "most significant relationship" to the tort. In other common law states, a parallel movement occurred and resulted in the adoption of a proper law test. In substance, both forms are similar in their approach. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Trade secrets are a type of intellectual property that includes formulas, practices, processes, designs, instruments, patterns, or compilations of information that have inherent economic value because they are not generally known or readily ascertainable by others, and which the owner takes reasonable measures to keep secret. Intellectual property law gives the owner of a trade secret the right to restrict others from disclosing it. In some jurisdictions, such secrets are referred to as confidential information. Definition. The precise language by which a trade secret is defined varies by jurisdiction, as do the particular types of information that are subject to trade secret protection. Three factors are common to all such definitions: A trade secret is information that: is not generally known to the public; confers economic benefit on its holder because the information is not publicly known; and where the holder makes reasonable efforts to maintain its secrecy. In international law, these three factors define a trade secret under article 39 of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, commonly referred to as the TRIPS Agreement. Similarly, in the United States Economic Espionage Act of 1996, "A trade secret, as defined under 18 U.S.C. § 1839(3)(A),(B) (1996), has three parts: (1) information; (2) reasonable measures taken to protect the information; and (3) which derives independent economic value from not being publicly known." Value. Trade secrets are an important, but invisible component of a company's intellectual property (IP). Their contribution to a company's value, measured in terms of its market capitalization, can be major. Being invisible, that contribution is hard to measure. Still, research shows that changes in trade secrets laws affect business spending on R&D and patents. This research provides indirect evidence of the value of trade secrecy. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Additional restrictions beyond public notice. Sex offenders on parole or probation in the United States are generally subject to the same restrictions as other parolees and probationers. Sex offenders who have completed probation or parole may also be subject to restrictions above and beyond those of most felons. In some jurisdictions, they cannot live within a certain distance of places children or families gather. Such places are usually schools, worship centers, and parks, but could also include public venues (stadiums), airports, apartments, malls, major retail stores, college campuses, and certain neighborhoods (unless for essential business). In some U.S. states, they may also be barred from voting after a sentence has been completed and, at the federal level, barred from owning firearms, like all felons. Some U.S. states have Civil Confinement laws, which allow very-high-risk sex offenders to be placed in secure facilities, "in many ways like prisons", where they are supposed to be offered treatment and regularly reevaluated for possible release. In practice, most states with Civil Commitment centers rarely release anyone. Texas has not released anyone in the 15 years since the program was started. In 2015, in response to a class action lawsuit, a Federal judge ruled Minnesota's Civil Commitment program to be unconstitutional, both for not providing effective treatment and for not fully releasing anyone since the program was started in 1994. The U.S. state of Missouri now restricts the activities of registered sex offenders on Halloween, requiring them to avoid Halloween-related contact with children and remain at their registered home address from 5 p.m. to 10:30 p.m., unless they are required to work that evening. Regardless of whether they are at work, offenders must extinguish all outside residential lighting and post a sign stating, "No candy or treats at this residence - sex offender at this residence". In the United Kingdom, anyone convicted of any criminal offense cannot work in the legal, medical, teaching, or nursing professions. List 99 includes people convicted of sex offenses barred from working in education and social work, though it also includes people convicted of theft, fraud, corruption, assault, and drugs offenses. Facebook and Instagram prohibit convicted sex offenders from using their websites. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Espionage, spying, or intelligence gathering is the act of obtaining secret or confidential information (intelligence). A person who commits espionage is called an espionage agent or spy. Any individual or spy ring (a cooperating group of spies), in the service of a government, company, criminal organization, or independent operation, can commit espionage. The practice is clandestine, as it is by definition unwelcome. In some circumstances, it may be a legal tool of law enforcement and in others, it may be illegal and punishable by law. Espionage is often part of an institutional effort by a government or commercial concern. However, the term tends to be associated with state spying on potential or actual enemies for military purposes. Spying involving corporations is known as industrial espionage. One way to gather data and information about a targeted organization is by infiltrating its ranks. Spies can then return information such as the size and strength of enemy forces. They can also find dissidents within the organization and influence them to provide further information or to defect. In times of crisis, spies steal technology and sabotage the enemy in various ways. Counterintelligence is the practice of thwarting enemy espionage and intelligence-gathering. Almost all sovereign states have strict laws concerning espionage, including those who practise espionage in other countries, and the penalties for being caught are often severe. Law. Espionage against a nation is a crime under the legal code of many nations. In the United States, it is covered by the Espionage Act of 1917. The risks of espionage vary. A spy violating the host country's laws may be deported, imprisoned, or even executed. A spy violating its own country's laws can be imprisoned for espionage or and treason (which in the United States and some other jurisdictions can only occur if they take up arms or aids the enemy against their own country during wartime), or even executed, as the Rosenbergs were. For example, when Aldrich Ames handed a stack of dossiers of U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) agents in the Eastern Bloc to his KGB-officer "handler", the KGB "rolled up" several networks, and at least ten people were secretly shot. When Ames was arrested by the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), he faced life in prison; his contact, who had diplomatic immunity, was declared persona non grata and taken to the airport. Ames' wife was threatened with life imprisonment if her husband did not cooperate; he did, and she was given a five-year sentence. Hugh Francis Redmond, a CIA officer in China, spent nineteen years in a Chinese prison for espionage—and died there—as he was operating without diplomatic cover and immunity. In United States law, treason, espionage, and spying are separate crimes. Treason and espionage have graduated punishment levels. The United States in World War I passed the Espionage Act of 1917. Over the years, many spies, such as the Soble spy ring, Robert Lee Johnson, the Rosenberg ring, Aldrich Hazen Ames, Robert Philip Hanssen, Jonathan Pollard, John Anthony Walker, James Hall III, and others have been prosecuted under this law. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

An oral will (or nuncupative will) is a will that has been delivered orally (that is, in speech) to witnesses, as opposed to the usual form of wills, which is written and according to a proper format. A minority of U.S. states (approximately 20 as of 2009), permit nuncupative wills under certain circumstances. Under most statutes, such wills can only be made during a person's "last sickness," must be witnessed by at least three persons, and reduced to writing by the witnesses within a specified amount of time after the testator's death. Some states also place limits on the types and value of property that can be bequeathed in this manner. A few U.S. states permit nuncupative wills made by military personnel on active duty. Under the law in England and Wales oral wills are permitted to military personnel and merchant seamen on duty (see law report below) and it is common practice in Commonwealth countries. An analogy can be drawn to the concept of last donations (donatio mortis causa) established by Roman law and still in effect in England and Wales. … Attestation clause. In the statutory law of wills and trusts, an attestation clause is a clause that is typically appended to a will, often just below the place of the testator's signature. United States. In the United States, attestation clauses were introduced into probate law with the promulgation of the first version of the Model Probate Code in the 1940s. Statutes that authorize self-proved wills typically provide that a will that contains this language will be admitted to probate without affidavits from the attesting witnesses. An attestation clause modeled on the Model Probate Code's language might provide: We, the undersigned testator and the undersigned witnesses, respectively, whose names are signed to the attached or foregoing instrument declare: (1) that the testator executed the instrument as the testator's will; (2) that, in the presence of both witnesses, the testator signed or acknowledged the signature already made or directed another to sign for the testator in the testator's presence; (3) that the testator executed the will as a free and voluntary act for the purposes expressed in it; (4) that each of the witnesses, in the presence of the testator and of each other, signed the will as a witness; (5) that the testator was of sound mind when the will was executed; and (6) that to the best knowledge of each of the witnesses the testator was, at the time the will was executed, at least eighteen (18) years of age or was a member of the armed forces or of the merchant marine of the United States or its allies. The validity and form of an attestation clause is usually a matter of U.S. state law, and will vary from state to state. Many states allow attestation clauses to be added as codicils to wills that were originally drafted without them. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Non-economic damages caps are tort reforms to limit (for example, "cap") damages in lawsuits for subjective, non-pecuniary harms such as pain, suffering, inconvenience, emotional distress, loss of society and companionship, loss of consortium, and loss of enjoyment of life. This is opposed to economic damages, which encompasses pecuniary harms such as medical bills, lost wages, lost future income, loss of use of property, costs of repair or replacement, the economic value of domestic services, and loss of employment or business opportunities. Non-economic damages should not be confused with punitive or exemplary damages, which are awarded purely to penalize defendants and do not aim to compensate either pecuniary or non-pecuniary losses. Non-economic damages caps are intended to reduce the ability of courts and, in the few jurisdictions which continue to maintain juries in civil cases, juries to award excessive or otherwise large damages for subjective harm that cannot easily be objectively assessed. The rationale underlying such caps is to curtail the impact of excessive damages on plaintiffs, particularly in the context of lawsuits against private individuals or companies for negligence causing personal injury or property damage and against medical professionals for malpractice claims brought by patients. With regard to the former, proponents of tort reform argue that large and subjective awards of damages against individuals who did not necessarily intend to cause harm is fundamentally unjust as it can severely impact the defendant's financial independence while large and unpredictable awards against businesses can increase the legal cost of doing business thus leading to unsustainably higher prices for consumers and decreasing overall economic activity to the detriment of society at large. With regard to the latter, proponents of tort reform argue that large, unpredictable damages causes an increase in the cost of medical malpractice insurance for healthcare professionals and encourages the practice of defensive medicine whereby medical practitioners agree to unnecessary treatment in order to decrease the likelihood of future malpractice claims. Opponents of tort reform regard non-economic damages caps in both instances as unfair to plaintiffs, particularly in cases involving personal injuries whose financial cost to victims may greatly exceed acceptable economic damages. Additionally, opponents argue that limits on damages in cases of medical malpractice may create moral hazard as healthcare professionals face reduced liability. Consequently, the implementation of non-economic damages caps and decisions as to the extent to which different areas of tort law are subject to caps is more contentious than caps on purely punitive damages. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Trade dress is the characteristics of the visual appearance of a product or its packaging (or even the design of a building) that signify the source of the product to consumers. Trade dress is an aspect of trademark law, which is a form of intellectual property protection law. Overview. Trade dress is an extension of trademark protection to "the design and shape of the materials in which a product is packaged, . 'Product configuration,' the design and shape of the product itself, may also be considered a form of trade dress." Product configuration applies particularly to situations where the product can be seen within the packaging (for example a toy car sold in packaging that operates as a shadow box for commercial display within—the collective look it creates is trade dress), or where the packaging is part of the product (for example the bottle of a soft drink, along with its visible contents, are trade dress, though the bottle is actually part of the product that retains its value to the consumer for as long as its contents last). Like all intellectual property law other than patent law, trade dress and other trademark elements are subject to the bar on functional features (for example a handle cannot be protected, though it may contain trade dress features that can prevent exact replicas of a particular trade dress handle). It is a question of which elements of the packaging are intrinsic to the basic function of the packaging. In the United States, the Lanham Act protects trade dress if it serves the same source-identifying function as a trademark. It is possible to register a trade dress as a trademark, but for practical reasons most trade dress and product configurations are protected without registration under 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a). United Kingdom. Trade dress can be protected as getup under the law of passing off in the UK. Passing off is a common law remedy for protecting an unregistered trade mark. Getup, packaging, business strategy, marketing techniques, advertisement themes etc. can also be protected under passing off. United States. Trade dress protection is intended to protect consumers from packaging or appearance of products that are designed to imitate other products; to prevent a consumer from buying one product under the belief that it is another. For example, the shape, color, and arrangement of the materials of a children's line of clothing can be protectable trade dress (though, the design of the garments themselves is not protected), as can the design of a magazine cover, the appearance and décor of a chain of Mexican-style restaurants, and a method of displaying wine bottles in a wine shop. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

A sex offender registry is a system in various countries designed to allow government authorities to keep track of the activities of sex offenders, including those who have completed their criminal sentences. Sex offender registration is usually accompanied by residential address notification requirements. In many jurisdictions, registered sex offenders are subject to additional restrictions, including on housing. Those on parole or probation may be subject to restrictions that do not apply to other parolees or probationers. These may include (or have been proposed to include) restrictions on being in the presence of underage persons (those below the age of majority), living in proximity to a school or day care center, owning toys or items targeted towards children, or using the Internet. Sex offender registries exist in many English-speaking countries, including Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United States, Trinidad and Tobago, Jamaica, South Africa, the United Kingdom, and the Republic of Ireland. The United States is the only country that allows public access to the sex offender registry; all other countries in the English-speaking world have sex offender registries only accessible by law enforcement. In offense-based systems, registration is required when a person is convicted (or, in some jurisdictions, adjudicated delinquent, found not guilty by reason of insanity, or found not criminally responsible) under one of the listed offenses requiring registration. In the U.S. federal system, persons registered are put into a tier program based on their offense of conviction. Risk based systems have been proposed but not implemented. In the United States, the vast majority of the states are applying offense-based registries, leaving the actual risk level of the offender and severity of the offense uncertain. The few U.S. states applying risk-based systems are pressured by the U.S. federal government to adopt offense-based systems in accordance with Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act. Studies have shown that actuarial risk assessment instruments consistently outperform the offense-based system mandated by federal law. Consequently, the effectiveness of offense-based registries has been questioned by professionals, and evidence exists suggesting that such registries are counterproductive. Some aspects of the current sex offender registries in the United States have been widely criticized by civil rights organizations Human Rights Watch and the ACLU, professional organizations Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers and Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, reformist groups Reform Sex Offender Laws, Inc., Women Against Registry and USA FAIR, and by child safety advocate Patty Wetterling, the Chair of National Center for Missing & Exploited Children. Virtually no studies exist finding U.S. registries effective, prompting some researchers to call them pointless, many even calling them counterproductive, arguing that they increase the rate of re-offense. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Treason is the crime of attacking a state authority to which one owes allegiance. This typically includes acts such as participating in a war against one's native country, attempting to overthrow its government, spying on its military, its diplomats, or its secret services for a hostile and foreign power, or attempting to kill its head of state. A person who commits treason is known in law as a traitor. Historically, in common law countries, treason also covered the murder of specific social superiors, such as the murder of a husband by his wife or that of a master by his servant. Treason (for example disloyalty) against one's monarch was known as high treason and treason against a lesser superior was petty treason. As jurisdictions around the world abolished petty treason, "treason" came to refer to what was historically known as high treason. At times, the term traitor has been used as a political epithet, regardless of any verifiable treasonable action. In a civil war or insurrection, the winners may deem the losers to be traitors. Likewise the term traitor is used in heated political discussion – typically as a slur against political dissidents, or against officials in power who are perceived as failing to act in the best interest of their constituents. In certain cases, as with the Dolchstoßlegende (Stab-in-the-back myth), the accusation of treason towards a large group of people can be a unifying political message. United States. The offense of treason exists at both federal and state levels. The federal crime is defined in the Constitution as either levying war against the United States or adhering to its enemies, and carries a sentence of death or imprisonment and fine. In the 1790s, opposition political parties were new and not fully accepted. Government leaders often considered their opponents to be traitors. Historian Ron Chernow reports that Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton and President George Washington "regarded much of the criticism fired at their administration as disloyal, even treasonous, in nature." When the undeclared Quasi-War broke out with France in 1797–98, "Hamilton increasingly mistook dissent for treason and engaged in hyperbole." Furthermore, the Jeffersonian opposition party behaved the same way. After 1801, with a peaceful transition in the political party in power, the rhetoric of "treason" against political opponents diminished. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

A codicil is a testamentary or supplementary document similar but not necessarily identical to a will. In some jurisdictions, it may serve to amend, rather than replace, a previously executed will. In others, it may serve as an alternative to a will. In still others, there is no recognized distinction between a codicil and a will. Origins. The concept of a testamentary document as similar to but distinct from a will originated in Roman law. In the pre-classical period, a testator was required to nominate an heir in order for his will to be valid (heredis institutio). Failure to nominate an heir or failure to observe the proper formalities for nomination of an heir resulted in an estate divided pursuant to the rules of intestacy. However, a testator was also able to institute a fideicommissum, a more flexible and less formal indication of the testator's intent, which could have the effect of transferring part or all of his estate after death, although with fewer rights to the beneficiary than those of a nominated heir. A codicillus (diminutive of codex) was a written document subject to fewer formal requirements than a will (testamentum) that, in its initial use, could supplement or amend an existing will, provided that the codicil was specified, i. e. confirmed, in the will. However, if the will did not confirm the codicil, all provisions in the codicil were considered fideicommissa. Furthermore, a will that did not nominate an heir could be considered a codicil. Thus, when a testator did not nominate an heir, his will would be considered a codicil and his bequests would become fideicommissa. This "opened a way to save certain dispositions in a will which was invalid due to some formal or substantive defect": if a testator failed or chose not to nominate an heir, an estate would pass to heirs pursuant to rules of intestacy, but those heirs would be bound by the fideicommissa in the codicil. By the time of the Codex Justinianus, the formal requirements for wills had relaxed, while requirements for codicils had become more stringent. "There was thus little difference between the formalities for a will and for a codicil", and an invalid will, when for example, no heir had been nominated, could often be validated as a codicil. It is acknowledged that classical Roman inheritance law was "highly complicated and to a large extent perplexedly entangled". Modern development. The codicil remained a distinct entity to a will (testament) to varying degrees throughout the Roman-influenced legal world. The concept of heredis institutio (a will requires an heir) was part of the jus commune up until modern times. In the United States, a codicil is a document that changes an existing will. Amendments made by a codicil may alter, explain, add to, subtract from, or confirm – and otherwise amend a will in any other way, minor or major, short of complete revocation. It is subject to the same formal requirements as a will. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Tort reform refers to changes in the civil justice system in common law countries that aim to reduce the ability of plaintiffs to bring tort litigation (particularly actions for negligence) or to reduce damages they can receive. Such changes are generally justified under the grounds that litigation is an inefficient means to compensate plaintiffs; that tort law permits frivolous or otherwise undesirable litigation to crowd the court system; or that the fear of litigation can serve to curtail innovation, raise the cost of consumer goods or insurance premiums for suppliers of services (for example medical malpractice insurance), and increase legal costs for businesses. Tort reform has primarily been prominent in common law jurisdictions, where criticism of judge-made rules regarding tort actions manifests in calls for statutory reform by the legislature. United States. Tort reform advocates frequently contend that too many of the lawsuits filed in the United States each year are "frivolous" lawsuits. The term "frivolous lawsuit" has acquired a broader rhetorical definition in political debates about tort reform, where it is sometimes used by reform advocates to describe legally non-frivolous tort lawsuits that critics believe are without merit, or award high damage awards relative to actual damages. In the United States, tort reform is a contentious political issue. US tort reform advocates propose, among other things, procedural limits on the ability to file claims, and capping the awards of damages. Opponents of tort reform argue that reformers have misstated the existence of any real factual issue and criticize tort reform as disguised corporate welfare. Tort reform advocates argue that the present tort system is too expensive, that meritless lawsuits clog up the courts, that per capita tort costs vary significantly from state to state, and that trial attorneys too often receive an overly large percentage of the punitive damages awarded to plaintiffs in tort cases. (The typical contingent fee arrangement provides for the lawyer to retain one-third of any recovery.) A Towers Perrin report indicates that U. S. tort costs were up slightly in 2007, are expected to significantly increase in 2008, and shows trends dating back as far as 1950. More recent research from the same source has found that tort costs as a percentage of GDP dropped between 2001 and 2009, and are now at their lowest level since 1984. High-profile tort cases are often portrayed by the media as the legal system's version of a lottery, where trial lawyers actively seek the magic combination of plaintiff, defendant, judge, and jury. Advocates of tort reform complain of unconstitutional regulation caused by litigation, and that litigation is used to circumvent the legislative process by achieving regulation that Congress is unwilling or unable to pass. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

In copyright law, related rights (or neighboring rights) are the rights of a creative work not connected with the work's actual author. It is used in opposition to the term "authors' rights". Neighboring rights is a more literal translation of the original French droits voisins. Both authors' rights and related rights are copyrights in the sense of English or U.S. law. Related rights vary much more widely in scope between different countries than authors' rights. The rights of performers, phonogram producers and broadcasting organizations are certainly covered, and are internationally protected by the Rome Convention for the Protection of Performers, Producers of Phonograms and Broadcasting Organisations signed in 1961. Within the European Union, the rights of film producers (as opposed to directors) and database creators are also protected by related rights, and the term is sometimes extended to include the sui generis rights in semiconductor topologies and other industrial design rights. A practical definition is that related rights are copyright-type rights that are not covered by the Berne Convention. International protection of related rights. Apart from the Rome convention, a number of other treaties address the protection of related rights: Convention for the Protection of Producers of Phonograms Against Unauthorized Duplication of Their Phonograms (Geneva Phonograms Convention, 1971). Convention Relating to the Distribution of Programme–Carrying Signals Transmitted by Satellite (Brussels Convention, 1974). Treaty on Intellectual Property in Respect of Integrated Circuits (IPIC Treaty, 1989). Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS, 1994). WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty (WPPT, 1996). Apart from the TRIPS Agreement, these treaties cannot truly be described as global: the Rome Convention had 83 signatories as of 2006, compared with 162 for the Berne Convention. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Rehabilitation is the process of re-educating and retraining those who have committed a crime. It generally involves psychological approaches which target the cognitive distortions associated with specific kinds of crime committed by particular offenders – but may also involve more general education such as literacy skills and work training. The goal is to reintegrate offenders back into society. Methods. A successful rehabilitation of a prisoner is also helped if convicted persons: are not placed in health-threateningly bad conditions, enjoy access to medical care and are protected from other forms of serious ill-treatment, are able to maintain ties to the outside world, learn new skills to assist them with working life on the outside, enjoy clear and detailed statutory regulations clarifying the safeguards applicable and governing the use and disposal of any record of data relating to criminal matters. Applications. Norway. Norway's prison system is based on the principle of normalization and away from retribution to focus on rehabilitation. Inmates have access to amenities they would have outside of prison, such as an exclusive mini fridge, flat-screen TV, private bathroom, and access to the outdoor environment. This, along with a shared kitchen and living area "to create a sense of family" among inmates and the absence of traditional prison uniforms contributes to Norway's rehabilitative normalcy system. The prison's structure is composed of Units A, B and C, with Unit A housing those in need of psychiatric or medical attention, thus being the most prohibitive of the three. Halden Fengsel, referred to as the "world's most humane maximum-security prison", embodies the country's goal of reintegration by aiding inmates in sorting out housing and employment before leaving the prison. Rehabilitative measures involve education, job training, workshops to acquire a trade, and therapy along with the humane treatment they receive from personnel who have to complete three years of training to become prison guards. The effectiveness of Norway's methods is evident as they hold the lowest recidivism rate worldwide at 20% as of December 2014. In comparison, in 2007, 14 prisons in England and Wales had reconviction rates of more than 70%, which cost an average of £40,000 a year for each prisoner. This has been accused of being "a huge investment in failure" and "a total lack of consideration for potential future victims of released prisoners". "Better out than in" is Norway's Correctional Service unofficial motto that is in view with their rehabilitative system as a justice to society by integrating inmates as functioning members of society upon release. Meditation. Vipassanā 10-day meditation courses were first taught in prisons in India in 1975. They have since been conducted in the US (1997–present), UK (1998), Spain (2003), Israel (2007) and Ireland (2015). Vipassana meditation aims to reduce negative mental states such as anger and aggression, and provide a path to inner peace. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Cruelty to animals, also called animal abuse, animal neglect or animal cruelty, is the infliction by omission (neglect) or by commission by humans of suffering or harm upon non-human animals. More narrowly, it can be the causing of harm or suffering for specific achievements, such as killing animals for entertainment; cruelty to animals sometimes encompasses inflicting harm or suffering as an end in itself, referred to as zoosadism. Divergent approaches to laws concerning animal cruelty occur in different jurisdictions throughout the world. For example, some laws govern methods of killing animals for food, clothing, or other products, and other laws concern the keeping of animals for entertainment, education, research, or pets. There are several conceptual approaches to the issue of cruelty to animals. Even though some practices, like animal fighting, are widely acknowledged as cruel, not all people and nations have the same definition of what constitutes animal cruelty. Many would claim that docking a piglet's tail without an anesthetic constitutes cruelty. Others would respond that it is a routine technique for meat production to prevent harm later in the pig's life. Additionally, laws governing animal cruelty vary from nation to nation. While it is routine practice in the United States, docking a piglet's tail as part of regular practice is prohibited in the European Union (EU). It may be said that there is nothing inherently wrong with using animals for human purposes, such as food, clothing, entertainment, and research, but that it should be done in a way that minimizes unnecessary pain and suffering, sometimes referred to as "humane" treatment. In contrast, some have argued that the definition of 'unnecessary' stated above varies widely and could include virtually all current use of animals. Utilitarian advocates argue from the position of costs and benefits and vary in their conclusions as to the allowable treatment of animals. Some utilitarians argue for a weaker approach which is closer to the animal welfare position, whereas others argue for a position that is similar to animal rights. Animal rights theorists criticize these positions, arguing that the words "unnecessary" and "humane" are subject to widely differing interpretations and that animals have basic rights. They say that most animal use itself is unnecessary and a cause of suffering, so the only way to ensure protection for animals is to end their status as property and to ensure that they are never viewed as a substance or as non-living things. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Joint wills and mutual wills are closely related terms used in the law of wills to describe two types of testamentary writing that may be executed by a married couple to ensure that their property is disposed of identically. Neither should be confused with mirror wills which means two separate, identical wills, which may or may not also be mutual wills. Joint wills. A joint will is a single document executed by more than one person (typically between spouses), making which has effect in relation to each signatory's property upon death (unless the will is revoked (cancels) the will during the signatory's lifetime). Although a single document, the joint will is a separate distribution of property by each executor (signatory) and will be treated as such on admission to probate. Mutual wills are any two (or more) wills which are mutually binding, such that following the first death the survivor is constrained in the ability to dispose of the property by the agreement the survivor made with the deceased. Historically such wills had an important role in ensuring property passed to children of a marriage rather than a spouse of a widow or widower on a remarriage. The recognition of these forms varies widely from one jurisdiction to the next. Some permit both, some will not recognize joint wills, and many have established a presumption that one or both of these forms creates a will contract. A joint will differs substantively from a mutual will in that the former is not intended to be irrevocable or to express a mutual intention; it is merely an administrative convenience. A will may be both joint (on one document) and mutual (see below). Mutual wills. Mutual wills have four basic requirements and a strict standard for enforceability: The agreement must be made in a particular form. The agreement must be contractual in effect. (Contrast Goodchild v Goodchild and Lewis v Cotton). The agreement must be intended to be irrevocable. The surviving party must have intended the will to reflect the agreement. Mutual wills are rare, and often another form of constructive trust is imposed (Healey v Browne). It is also noted (Carnwath J in Re Goodchild) that a mutual will is a technical legal device requiring an intention to form a binding agreement and that this often differs from the "loose moral obligation" presupposed as binding by the layman. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Trover cases in the United States. Trover is the name of the action which lay, at common law, for the recovery of damages for the conversion of personal property in his possession, usually involving chattels held in bailment. Although the old forms of action have been abolished or disappeared under modern civil procedure in the United States, the common law action for conversion still exists in fact, if not in form. (Extensive case law is reviewed.)  A person who purchases personal property from one not authorized to sell the chattel may be held liable for the conversion of the article. This is regardless of the fact that the purchaser was honestly mistaken, or acted innocently, in good faith and without knowledge of the seller's lack of authority to make the sale. This rule also holds in cases where the purchaser takes possession of the goods, mixes them with his own property, holds them to his own use, refuses to surrender possession on demand, disposes of the goods to a third person by sale, lease or bailment or in general exercises rights of ownership as to the property purchased in denial of the real owner's rights after knowledge of the rights of the true owner. Deaderick  Oulds, 1887. In the 1887 case of Deaderick  Oulds, the Supreme Court of Tennessee ruled on a case of trover. The defendant, Oulds, cut 800 walnut logs, branded them with the letter "D", then proceeded to float them down a river with the intention of recovering them downstream. Sometime later, Oulds found an unmarked log among his other marked logs which had peculiar cracks at one end. He floated the unmarked log down the river, and it washed up on an island owned by the plaintiff, Deaderick, who then claimed the log as his in trover or replevin. The Tennessee court quoted the English case of Bridges  Hawkesworth where the plaintiff, being in the shop of the defendant, picked up a parcel containing bank notes. The defendant, at the request of the finder, took charge of the notes, to hold for the owner. After three years, no one had come forth to claim them. The defendant shop owner refused to deliver them to the plaintiff. The court held the defendant shop owner liable in trover for the notes. The Tennessee Supreme Court observed it is essential in cases of trover, that the property must be found; it must at the time when the finder came upon it, to have been in such a situation as to clearly indicate that it was lost. It cannot have been placed there by the original owner who lost it by carelessness or forgetfulness, where it was later found by someone else. In such cases, the owner of the premises where the property is found is treated as a quasi-bailee (for example he holds the property for the original owner), and he may maintain trover against the finder. Since the log was not intentionally laid by the (unknown) owner on the land of the plaintiff (Deaderick), and hence he was not a quasi-bailee for the owner, he cannot hold against the superior right of the defendant (Oulds) arising out of his prior possession and earlier finding of the log. Judgment for ownership of the log was to the defendant Oulds. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

In copyright law, related rights (or neighboring rights) are the rights of a creative work not connected with the work's actual author. It is used in opposition to the term "authors' rights". Neighboring rights is a more literal translation of the original French droits voisins. Both authors' rights and related rights are copyrights in the sense of English or U.S. law. Related rights vary much more widely in scope between different countries than authors' rights. The rights of performers, phonogram producers and broadcasting organizations are certainly covered, and are internationally protected by the Rome Convention for the Protection of Performers, Producers of Phonograms and Broadcasting Organisations signed in 1961. Within the European Union, the rights of film producers (as opposed to directors) and database creators are also protected by related rights, and the term is sometimes extended to include the sui generis rights in semiconductor topologies and other industrial design rights. A practical definition is that related rights are copyright-type rights that are not covered by the Berne Convention. International protection of related rights. Apart from the Rome convention, a number of other treaties address the protection of related rights: Convention for the Protection of Producers of Phonograms Against Unauthorized Duplication of Their Phonograms (Geneva Phonograms Convention, 1971). Convention Relating to the Distribution of Programme–Carrying Signals Transmitted by Satellite (Brussels Convention, 1974). Treaty on Intellectual Property in Respect of Integrated Circuits (IPIC Treaty, 1989). Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS, 1994). WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty (WPPT, 1996). Apart from the TRIPS Agreement, these treaties cannot truly be described as global: the Rome Convention had 83 signatories as of 2006, compared with 162 for the Berne Convention. Relation to authors' rights. Related rights are independent of any authors' rights, as is made clear in the various treaties (Article 1 Rome; Article 7.1 Geneva; Article 1.2 WPPT). Hence a CD recording of a song is concurrently protected by four copyright-type rights: Authors' rights of the composer of the music. Authors' rights of the lyricist. Performers' rights of the singer and musicians. Producers' rights of the person or corporation that made the recording. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Recidivism from recidive and -ism, from Latin recidivus "recurring", from re- "back" and cado "I fall") is the act of a person repeating an undesirable behavior after they have experienced negative consequences of that behavior. It is also used to refer to the percentage of former prisoners who are rearrested for a similar offense. The term is frequently used in conjunction with criminal behavior and substance abuse. Recidivism is a synonym for "relapse", which is more commonly used in medicine and in the disease model of addiction. Norway has one of the lowest recidivism rates in the world at 20%. Prisons in Norway and the Norwegian criminal justice system focus on restorative justice and rehabilitating prisoners rather than punishment. United States. According to the latest study by the US Department of Justice, recidivism measures require three characteristics: 1. a starting event, such as a release from prison 2. a measure of failure following the starting event, such as a subsequent arrest, conviction, or return to prison 3. an observation or follow-up period that generally extends from the date of the starting event to a predefined end date as in 6 months, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years, or 9 years). The latest  reported that 83% of state prisoners were arrested at some point in the 9 years following their release. A large majority of those were arrested within the first 3 years, and more than 50% get rearrested within the first year. However, the longer the time period, the higher the reported recidivism rate, but the lower the actual threat to public safety. According to an April 2011 report by the Pew Center on the States, the average national recidivism rate for released prisoners is 43%. According to the National Institute of Justice, almost 44 percent of the recently released return before the end of their first year out. About 68 percent of 405,000 prisoners released in 30 states in 2005 were arrested for a new crime within three years of their release from prison, and 77 percent were arrested within five years, and by year nine that number reaches 83 percent. Beginning in the 1990s, the US rate of incarceration increased dramatically, filling prisons to capacity in bad conditions for inmates. Crime continues inside many prison walls. Gangs exist on the inside, often with tactical decisions made by imprisoned leaders. While the US justice system has traditionally focused its efforts at the front end of the system, by locking people up, it has not exerted an equal effort at the tail end of the system: decreasing the likelihood of reoffending among formerly incarcerated persons. This is a significant issue because ninety-five percent of prisoners will be released back into the community at some point. A cost study performed by the Vera Institute of Justice, a non-profit committed to decarceration in the United States, found that the average per-inmate cost of incarceration among the 40 states surveyed was $31,286 per year. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Terrorism, in its broadest sense, is the use of intentional violence and fear to achieve political or ideological aims. The term is used in this regard primarily to refer to intentional violence during peacetime or in the context of war against non-combatants (mostly civilians and neutral military personnel). The terms "terrorist" and "terrorism" originated during the French Revolution of the late 18th century but became widely used internationally and gained worldwide attention in the 1970s during the Troubles in Northern Ireland, the Basque conflict, and the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. The increased use of suicide attacks from the 1980s onwards was typified by the 2001 September 11 attacks in the United States. There are various different definitions of terrorism, with no universal agreement about it. Terrorism is a charged term. It is often used with the connotation of something that is "morally wrong". Governments and non-state groups use the term to abuse or denounce opposing groups. Varied political organizations have been accused of using terrorism to achieve their objectives. These include left-wing and right-wing political organizations, nationalist groups, religious groups, revolutionaries and ruling governments. Legislation declaring terrorism a crime has been adopted in many states. State terrorism is that perpetrated by nation states, but is not considered such by the state conducting it, making legality a gray area. There is no consensus as to whether terrorism should be regarded as a war crime. Separating activism and terrorism can be difficult and has been described as a 'fine line'. The Global Terrorism Database, maintained by the University of Maryland, College Park, has recorded more than 61,000 incidents of non-state terrorism, resulting in at least 140,000 deaths, between 2000 and 2014. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Legislation. Such were the principal stages in the history of the law as it affected wills made before 1838 or proved before 1858. The principal Acts in force in the early twentieth century were the Wills Act 1837, the amending Act of 1852, the Court of Probate Act 1857, the Judicature Acts 1873 and 1875, and the Land Transfer Act 1897. All but the Acts of 1837 and 1852 deal mainly with what happens to the will after death, whether under the voluntary or contentious jurisdiction of the Probate Division. The earliest on the statute roll is an Act of Henry the 3rd  (1236), enabling a widow to bequeath the crops of her lands. Before the Wills Act 1837 uniformity in the law had been urgently recommended by the Real Property Commissioners in 1833. It appears from their report that at the time of its appearance there were ten different ways in which a will might be made under different circumstances. The Wills Act 1837 affected both the making and the interpretation of wills. Excluding the latter for the present, its main provisions were these: All property, real and personal, and of whatever tenure, may be disposed of by will. If customary freeholds or copyholds are devised, the will must be entered on the manorial rolls. No will made by any person under the age of twenty-one is valid. Every will is to be in writing, signed at the foot or end thereof by the testator or by some person in his presence and by his direction, and such signature is to be made or acknowledged by the testator in the presence of two or more witnesses present at the same time, who are to subscribe the will in the presence of the testator. It is usual for the testator and the witnesses to sign every sheet. Gifts to a witness or the husband or wife of a witness are void. A will is revoked by a later will, or by destruction with the intention of revoking, but not by presumption arising from an alteration in circumstances. Alterations in a will must be executed and attested as a will. A will speaks from the death of the testator, unless a contrary intention appears. An unattested document may be, if properly identified, incorporated in a will. Rules of interpretation or construction depend chiefly on decisions of the courts, to a smaller extent on statutory enactment. The law was gradually brought into its present condition through precedents extending back for centuries, especially decisions of the court of chancery, the court par excellence of construction, as distinguished from the court of probate. The court of probate did not deal unless incidentally with the meaning of the will; its jurisdiction was confined to seeing that it was duly executed. The present state of the law of interpretation is highly technical. Some phrases have obtained a conventional meaning which the testators who used them probably did not dream of. Many of the judicial doctrines which had gradually become established were altered by the Wills Act 1837. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Trover is a form of lawsuit in common-law countries for recovery of damages for wrongful taking of personal property. Trover belongs to a series of remedies for such wrongful taking, its distinctive feature being recovery only for the value of whatever was taken, not for the recovery of the property itself. Overview Although actions in trover can be traced to the time of Bracton, and later Edward the 1st of England, it became more clearly defined later during the reign of Henry the 6th of England, 1422–1461 and 1470–1471. Action in trover became a mature legal doctrine during the reign of Elizabeth the 1st of England, 1558–1603. Early trover cases involved the keeping or taking of a bailment by the bailee (the person charged to hold the property with "ordinary care"). Others concerned the use of lost chattels found by another and determining who was the real owner. Early on, there was difficulty in dealing with situations where chattels held by a bailee were used by a third party. Examples could be sheep, horses, farm goods, grains or other chattels left in the care of a person who was required to exercise ordinary care. If negligence led to damages, an action could be had. A third person might use the chattel, returning it in a damaged condition. The early common law had some difficulty in dealing with this kind of situation. This led to expansions of actions in trover. The theory of trover was that the defendant, by "converting" the chattel to his own use, had appropriated the plaintiff's property, for which he was required to make compensation. The plaintiff was not required to accept the chattel when it was tendered back to him. He could recover damages for the full value of the chattel at the time and place of conversion. The effect was that the defendant was compelled to buy the chattel at a forced sale, carried out by means of an action in trover. Trover actions frequently concerned the finding of lost property. It could also involve cargo on ships, such as those lost at sea and later found. Trover often involved cases in which the only "most correct" owner could be determined. For instance, if an envelope of bank notes or currency were to be found, the court would attempt to identify the true owner, but this would often prove to be impossible. In that case, the finder would be the next best owner and be considered the rightful possessor. Trover cases have been described as "finders keepers, losers weepers" cases. Trover damages came to be measured by the market value of the object, not necessarily its replacement cost if it were new. Sometimes, compensation for deprivation of use and compensation for other losses naturally and approximately caused by the wrongful taking could be added. Case law results are mixed. The plaintiff could also recover interest that would have been earned by the money value of the object and any expense (except attorney's fees) incurred in attempting to recover the object. If the taker sold the object for more than its market value, the plaintiff could receive the higher price. However, selling the chattel could change the action to that of a true conversion which was a form of theft. If the taker had made improvements on the object (for example, repainted it), the value of such improvements are not deducted from the plaintiff's recovery unless the taking was by mistake. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Plant genetic resources describe the variability within plants that comes from human and natural selection over millennia. Their intrinsic value mainly concerns agricultural crops (crop biodiversity). According to the 1983 revised International Undertaking on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture of the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), plant genetic resources are defined as the entire generative and vegetative reproductive material of species with economical and or social value, especially for the agriculture of the present and the future, with special emphasis on nutritional plants. In the State of the World’s Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (1998) the FAO defined Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (PGRFA) as the diversity of genetic material contained in traditional varieties and modern cultivars as well as crop wild relatives and other wild plant species that can be used now or in the future for food and agriculture. History. The first use of plant genetic resources dates to more than 10,000 years ago, when farmers selected from the genetic variation they found in wild plants to develop their crops. As human populations moved to different climates and ecosystems, taking the crops with them, the crops adapted to the new environments, developing, for example, genetic traits providing tolerance to conditions such as drought, water logging, frost and extreme heat. These traits - and the plasticity inherent in having wide genetic variability - are important properties of plant genetic resources. In recent centuries, although humans had been prolific in collecting exotic flora from all corners of the globe to fill their gardens, it wasn’t until the early 20th century that the widespread and organized collection of plant genetic resources for agricultural use began in earnest. Russian geneticist Nikolai Vavilov, considered by some as the father of plant genetic resources, realized the value of genetic variability for breeding and collected thousands of seeds during his extensive travels to establish one of the first gene banks. Vavilov inspired the American Jack Harlan to collect seeds from across the globe for the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). David Fairchild, another botanist at USDA, successfully introduced many important crops (for example cherries, soybeans, pistachios) into the United States. It wasn’t until 1967 that the term genetic resources was coined by Otto Frankel and Erna Bennett at the historic International Conference on Crop Plant Exploration and Conservation, organized by the FAO and the International Biological Program (IBP) “The effective utilization of genetic resources requires that they are adequately classified and evaluated” was a key message from the conference. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

A pardon is a government decision to allow a person to be relieved of some or all of the legal consequences resulting from a criminal conviction. A pardon may be granted before or after conviction for the crime, depending on the laws of the jurisdiction. Pardons can be granted in many countries when individuals are deemed to have demonstrated that they have "paid their debt to society", or are otherwise considered to be deserving of them. In some jurisdictions of some nations, accepting a pardon may implicitly constitute an admission of guilt; the offer is refused in some cases. Cases of wrongful conviction are in recent times more often dealt with by appeal rather than by pardon; however, a pardon is sometimes offered when innocence is undisputed in order to avoid the costs that are associated with a retrial. Clemency plays a critical role when capital punishment exists in a jurisdiction. Pardons are sometimes seen as a mechanism for combating corruption, allowing a particular authority to circumvent a flawed judicial process to free someone who is seen as wrongly convicted. Pardons can also be a source of controversy. In extreme cases, some pardons may be seen as acts of corruption by officials in the form of granting effective immunity as political favors. United States. U.S. Constitution. In the United States, the pardon power for offenses against the United States is granted to the President of the United States under Article 2, Section 2 of the United States Constitution which states that the President "shall have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of impeachment". The U.S. Supreme Court has interpreted this language to include the power to grant many different forms of clemency (generally less sweeping than a full pardon), including not only pardons, but also conditional pardons, commutations of sentence, conditional commutations of sentence, remissions of fines, forfeitures and other criminal financial penalties, respites and reprieves, and amnesties. The pardon power of the President applies only to convictions under federal law. Additionally, the power extends to military court-martial cases as well as convictions in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. Almost all pardon petitions are addressed to the President, who grants or denies the request. In some cases, the President will, of their own accord, issue a pardon. Typically, applications for pardons are referred for review and non-binding recommendation by the Office of the Pardon Attorney, an official of the United States Department of Justice. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

A duel is an arranged engagement in combat between two people, with matched weapons, in accordance with agreed-upon rules. During the 17th and 18th centuries (and earlier), duels were mostly single combat fought with swords (the rapier and later the small sword), but beginning in the late 18th century in England, duels were more commonly fought using pistols. Fencing and shooting continued to co-exist throughout the 19th century. The duel was based on a code of honor. Duels were fought not so much to kill the opponent as to gain "satisfaction", that is, to restore one's honor by demonstrating a willingness to risk one's life for it, and as such the tradition of dueling was originally reserved for the male members of nobility; however, in the modern era, it extended to those of the upper classes generally. On occasion, duels with swords or pistols were fought between women. Legislation against dueling goes back to the medieval period. The Fourth Council of the Lateran (1215) outlawed duels, and civil legislation in the Holy Roman Empire against dueling was passed in the wake of the Thirty Years' War. From the early 17th century, duels became illegal in the countries where they were practiced. Dueling largely fell out of favor in England by the mid-19th century and in Continental Europe by the turn of the 20th century. Dueling declined in the Eastern United States in the 19th century and by the time of the American Civil War, dueling had begun to wane even in the South. Public opinion, not legislation, caused the change. Research has linked the decline of dueling to increases in state capacity. A duel is an arranged engagement in combat between two people, with matched weapons, in accordance with agreed-upon rules. During the 17th and 18th centuries (and earlier), duels were mostly single combat fought with swords (the rapier and later the small sword), but beginning in the late 18th century in England, duels were more commonly fought using pistols. Fencing and shooting continued to co-exist throughout the 19th century. The duel was based on a code of honor. Duels were fought not so much to kill the opponent as to gain "satisfaction", that is, to restore one's honor by demonstrating a willingness to risk one's life for it, and as such the tradition of dueling was originally reserved for the male members of nobility; however, in the modern era, it extended to those of the upper classes generally. On occasion, duels with swords or pistols were fought between women. Legislation against dueling goes back to the medieval period. The Fourth Council of the Lateran (1215) outlawed duels, and civil legislation in the Holy Roman Empire against dueling was passed in the wake of the Thirty Years' War. From the early 17th century, duels became illegal in the countries where they were practiced. Dueling largely fell out of favor in England by the mid-19th century and in Continental Europe by the turn of the 20th century. Dueling declined in the Eastern United States in the 19th century and by the time of the American Civil War, dueling had begun to wane even in the South. Public opinion, not legislation, caused the change. Research has linked the decline of dueling to increases in state capacity. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Legal history of wills Wills have a lengthy history. Ancient Greece. The Ancient Greek practice concerning wills was not the same in all places; some states permitted men to dispose of their estates, others wholly deprived them of that privilege. According to Plutarch, Solon "is much commended for his law concerning wills; for before his time no man was allowed to make any, but all the wealth of deceased persons belonged to their families; but he permitted them to bestow it on whom they pleased, esteeming friendship a stronger tie than kindred, and affection than necessity, and thus put every man's estate in the disposal of the possessor; yet he allowed not all sorts of wills, but required the following conditions in all persons that made them: That they must be citizens of Athens, not slaves, or foreigners, for then their estates were confiscated for the public use. That they must be men who have arrived at twenty years of age, for women and men under that age were not permitted to dispose by will of more than one medimn of barley. That they must not be adopted; for when adopted persons died without issue, the estates they received by adoption returned to the relations of the men who adopted them. That they should have no male children of their own, for then their estate belonged to these. If they had only daughters, the persons to whom the inheritance was bequeathed were obliged to marry them. Yet men were allowed to appoint heirs to succeed their children, in case these happened to die under twenty years of age. That they should be in their right minds, because testaments extorted through the frenzy of a disease, or dotage of old age, were not in reality the wills of the persons that made them. That they should not be under imprisonment, or other constraint, their consent being then only forced, nor in justice to be reputedly voluntary. That they should not be induced to it by the charms and insinuations of a wife; for (says Plutarch) the wise lawgiver with good reason thought that no difference was to be put between deceit and necessity, flattery and compulsion, since both are equally powerful to persuade a man from reason. Wills were usually signed before several witnesses, who put seals to them for confirmation, then placed them in the hands of trustees, who were obliged to see them performed. At Athens, some of the magistrates were very often present at the making of wills. Sometimes the archons were also present. Sometimes the testator declared his will before sufficient witnesses, without committing it to writing. Thus Callias, fearing to be cut off by a wicked conspiracy, is said to have made an open declaration of his will before the popular assembly at Athens. There were several copies of wills in Diogenes Laërtius, as those of Aristotle, Lyco of Troas, and Theophrastus; whence it appears they had a common form, beginning with a wish for life and health." --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Replevin or claim and delivery (sometimes called revendication) is a legal remedy, which enables a person to recover personal property taken wrongfully or unlawfully, and to obtain compensation for resulting losses. Nature. From medieval times, there has also come down to us a summary process, known as replevin, by which a man out of whose possession goods have been taken may obtain their return until the right to the goods can be determined by a court of law. Replevin arose out of the need of a turbulent society to discourage resort to self help and although for a long time primarily used in disputes about distress between landlord and tenant, it was gradually expanded to cover all cases of allegedly wrongful dispossession. If the plaintiff wanted return of his chattel in specie, replevin was a more appropriate remedy than either trespass or trover in which only damages could be recovered. Restoration of the property is, of course, only provisional, pending determination of title. In common law, several types of action existed with respect to deprivation of possession (being subdivided into the wrongful taking of chattels and the unjust detention of them, even where the original taking was lawful): In the case of wrongful taking: A writ of replevin was available only for an unlawful taking in the nature of a wrongful distress, where restitution could be made for the goods wrongfully taken (being in the nature of a redelivery of the pledge or the thing taken in distress) with damages for the loss sustained by such action. As distrained goods are in the custody of the law, any attempt to take them back by force without a writ of replevin could be contested by writ of rescous or de parco fracto, with a remedy in damages. A writ of trespass vi et armis was available in the taking of goods, with a remedy in damages. An action of trover and conversion was available for the non-forcible taking of goods, with a remedy in damages. In the case of unjust detention: Replevin lay to recover goods still held after a tender of amends. Detinue lay to recover lent goods where the holder refused to return them to the owner. However, the defendant was allowed to exculpate himself by oath, so this action was displaced by that of trover and conversion. At common law, the ordinary action for the recovery of goods wrongfully taken was originally one of detinue, but no means of immediate recovery was possible until the action was tried. Replevin arose to deal with the matter of the illegal distress of goods for rent or damage feasant, in order to procure their restoration to the owner. Illegal distress has been held to occur where: no relationship of landlord and tenant exists at all, there is no demise at a fixed rent, no rent is due, or none due to the person who has distrained, goods have been released before the distress, or tendered before the impounding, the entry was illegal, or things privileged from distress (ie, neither goods nor chattel) have been seized. Replevin will not lie where if any part of the rent claimed was due, but this defense is not effective where the only rent claimed by the landlord is not recoverable by distress --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Governing laws. The grant and enforcement of patents are governed by national laws, and also by international treaties, where those treaties have been given effect in national laws. Patents are granted by national or regional patent offices, for example national or regional administrative authorities. A given patent is therefore only useful for protecting an invention in the country in which that patent is granted. In other words, patent law is territorial in nature. When a patent application is published, the invention disclosed in the application becomes prior art and enters the public domain (if not protected by other patents) in countries where a patent applicant does not seek protection, the application thus generally becoming prior art against anyone (including the applicant) who might seek patent protection for the invention in those countries. Commonly, a nation or a group of nations forms a patent office with responsibility for operating that nation's patent system, within the relevant patent laws. The patent office generally has responsibility for the grant of patents, with infringement being the remit of national courts. The authority for patent statutes in different countries varies. In the UK, substantive patent law is contained in the Patents Act 1977 as amended. In the United States, the Constitution empowers Congress to make laws to "promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts ...". The laws Congress passed are codified in Title 35 of the United States Code and created the United States Patent and Trademark Office. There is a trend towards global harmonization of patent laws, with the World Trade Organization (WTO) being particularly active in this area. The TRIPS Agreement has been largely successful in providing a forum for nations to agree on an aligned set of patent laws. Conformity with the TRIPS agreement is a requirement of admission to the WTO and so compliance is seen by many nations as important. This has also led to many developing nations, which may historically have developed different laws to aid their development, enforcing patents laws in line with global practice. Internationally, there are international treaty procedures, such as the procedures under the European Patent Convention (EPC) , that centralize some portion of the filing and examination procedure. Similar arrangements exist among the member states of ARIPO and OAPI, the analogous treaties among African countries, and the nine CIS member states that have formed the Eurasian Patent Organization. A key international convention relating to patents is the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, initially signed in 1883. The Paris Convention sets out a range of basic rules relating to patents, and although the convention does not have direct legal effect in all national jurisdictions, the principles of the convention are incorporated into all notable current patent systems. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Compensation for wrongful conviction. Article 14(6) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) states that when a miscarriage of justice has occurred and the defendant's conviction has been reversed or they have been pardoned, "the person who has suffered punishment as a result of such conviction shall be compensated according to law". The right to compensation is also authorized by Article 3 of Protocol Number 7 to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and Article 10 of the American Convention on Human Rights. Four broad approaches allow for the payment of compensation following a miscarriage of justice: tort liability in common law; claims for a breach of constitutional or human rights; statutory relief where specific legislation exists to compensate individuals who are wrongfully convicted; and non-statutory relief by way of ex-gratia schemes based on the largesse of the government. In a study of different approaches to the payment of compensation in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, only the US and the UK have statutory schemes in place. In the United States, the federal government, the District of Columbia, and 38 states have such legislation on their statutes. Twelve states have no laws requiring compensation to be paid. However, each state differs widely in regard to eligibility requirements, maximum payments, issues concerning factual innocence, the burden of proof, the behavior of the claimant which contributed to the (now overturned) conviction, and the claimant's prior criminal history. In some states, statutes of limitations also apply. The significant benefits of statutory schemes is that they provide money and services in compensation to individuals who have been wrongfully convicted without regard to fault or blame; they do not require claimants to prove how the prosecution or police committed their mistakes.  Implications. The concept of miscarriage of justice has important implications for standard of review, in that an appellate court will often only exercise its discretion to correct a plain error when a miscarriage of justice (or "manifest injustice") would otherwise occur. In recent years, DNA evidence has been used to clear many people falsely convicted. The risk of miscarriages of justice is often cited as a cause to eliminate the death penalty. When condemned persons are executed before they are determined to have been wrongly convicted, the effect of that miscarriage of justice is irreversible. Wrongly executed people nevertheless occasionally receive posthumous pardons—which essentially void the conviction—or have their convictions quashed. Even when a wrongly convicted person is not executed, years in prison can have a substantial, irreversible effect on the person and their family. The risk of miscarriage of justice is therefore also an argument against long sentences, like a life sentence, and cruel prison conditions. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Repeal of anti-miscegenation laws, 1948–1967. In 1948, the California Supreme Court ruled in Perez v Sharp (1948) that the California anti-miscegenation laws violated the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, the first time since Reconstruction that a state court declared such laws unconstitutional, and making California the first state since Ohio in 1887 to overturn its anti-miscegenation law. The case raised constitutional questions in states which had similar laws, which led to the repeal or overturning of such laws in fourteen states by 1967. Sixteen states, mainly Southern states, were the exception. In any case, in the 1950s, the repeal of anti-miscegenation laws was still a controversial issue in the U.S., even among supporters of racial integration. In 1958, the political theorist Hannah Arendt, a Jewish refugee from Nazi Germany, who escaped from Europe during the Holocaust, wrote in an essay in response to the Little Rock Crisis, the Civil Rights struggle for the racial integration of public schools which took place in Little Rock, Arkansas, in 1957, that anti-miscegenation laws were an even deeper injustice than the racial segregation of public schools. The free choice of a spouse, she argued in Reflections on Little Rock, was "an elementary human right": "Even political rights, like the right to vote, and nearly all other rights enumerated in the Constitution, are secondary to the inalienable human rights to 'life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness' proclaimed in the Declaration of Independence; and to this category the right to home and marriage unquestionably belongs." Arendt was severely criticized by fellow liberals, who feared that her essay would arouse the racist fears common among whites and thus hinder the struggle of African Americans for civil rights and racial integration. Commenting on the Supreme Court's ruling in Brown v Board of Education of Topeka against de jure racial segregation in education, Arendt argued that anti-miscegenation laws were more basic to racial segregation than racial segregation in education. Arendt's analysis of the centrality of laws against interracial marriage to white supremacy echoed the conclusions of Gunnar Myrdal. In his essay Social Trends in America and Strategic Approaches to the Negro Problem (1948), Myrdal ranked the social areas where restrictions were imposed by Southern whites on the freedom of African Americans through racial segregation from the least to the most important: jobs, courts and police, politics, basic public facilities, "social equality" including dancing and handshaking, and most importantly, marriage. This ranking was indeed reflective of the way in which the barriers against desegregation fell under the pressure of the protests of the emerging civil rights movement. First, legal segregation in the army, in education and in basic public services fell, then restrictions on the voting rights of African-Americans were lifted. These victories were ensured by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. But the bans on interracial marriage were the last to go, in 1967. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

A will or testament is a legal document that expresses a person's (testator) wishes as to how their property (estate) is to be distributed after their death and as to which person (executor) is to manage the property until its final distribution. For the distribution (devolution) of property not determined by a will, see inheritance and intestacy. Though it has been thought a "will" historically applied only to real property, while "testament" applied only to personal property (thus giving rise to the popular title of the document as "last will and testament"), records show the terms have been used interchangeably. Thus, the word "will" validly applies to both personal and real property. A will may also create a testamentary trust that is effective only after the death of the testator. History. Throughout most of the world, the disposition of a dead person's estate has been a matter of social custom. According to Plutarch, the written will was invented by Solon. Originally, it was a device intended solely for men who died without an heir. The English phrase "will and testament" is derived from a period in English law when Old English and Law French were used side by side for maximum clarity. Other such legal doublets include "breaking and entering" and "peace and quiet". Freedom of disposition. The concept of the freedom of disposition by will, familiar as it is in modern England and the United States, both generally considered common law systems, is by no means universal. In fact, complete freedom is the exception rather than the rule.: 654  Civil law systems often put restrictions on the possibilities of disposal; see for example "Forced heirship". LGBT advocates have pointed to the inheritance rights of spouses as desirable for same-sex couples as well, through same-sex marriage or civil unions. Opponents of such advocacy rebut this claim by pointing to the ability of same-sex couples to disperse their assets by will. Historically, however, it was observed that "ven if a same-sex partner executes a will, there is risk that the survivor will face prejudice in court when disgruntled heirs challenge the will", with courts being more willing to strike down wills leaving property to a same-sex partner on such grounds as incapacity or undue influence. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Tracing is a legal process, not a remedy, by which a claimant demonstrates what has happened to his or her property, identifies its proceeds and those persons who have handled or received them, and asks the court to award a proprietary remedy in respect of the property, or an asset substituted for the original property or its proceeds. Tracing allows transmission of legal claims from the original assets to either the proceeds of sale of the assets or new substituted assets. Tracing ordinarily facilitates an equitable remedy, and is subject to the usual limitations and bars on equitable remedies in common law countries. In many common law countries, there are two concurrent processes, tracing at common law and tracing in equity. However, because the right to trace at common law is so circumscribed, the equitable process is almost universally relied upon, as equitable tracing can be performed into a mixed fund. Illustrations. "Tracing is thus neither a claim nor a remedy. It is merely a process by which a claimant demonstrates what has happened to his property, identifies its proceeds and the persons who have handled or received them, and justifies his claim that the proceeds can properly be regarded as representing his property." - Foskett v McKeown For example, if A has money in a solicitor’s account and the solicitor takes that money to buy a painting, then A may be able to make a claim against the painting. This claim will take priority even if the solicitor is bankrupt and has other unsecured claims against him. Judicially, probably the most famous example of a tracing claim is Attorney‐General for Hong Kong v Reid, where Mr Reid, then a crown prosecutor for Hong Kong, received bribes for passing information to organized crime in Hong Kong. Under Hong Kong law, the proceeds of those bribes were held on constructive trusts for the government of Hong Kong. Mr Reid then invested the proceeds of the bribes in land in New Zealand, and the land increased substantially in value. When he was caught, Mr Reid admitted that the money was subject to a constructive trust, but argued that he should only be liable to repay the amount of the bribes, and then any profit attributable to the increase in value of the land in New Zealand was not connected with his wrongdoing. However, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council held that the government of Hong Kong's claim to the money could be traced into the land, and thus the claimant was entitled to the full value of the land, as without his wrong, Mr Reid would never have made those profits and it would be grossly inequitable for him to keep them. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

A patent is a type of intellectual property that gives its owner the legal right to exclude others from making, using, or selling an invention for a limited period of time in exchange for publishing an enabling disclosure of the invention. In most countries, patent rights fall under private law and the patent holder must sue someone infringing the patent in order to enforce their rights. In some industries patents are an essential form of competitive advantage; in others they are irrelevant. The procedure for granting patents, requirements placed on the patentee, and the extent of the exclusive rights vary widely between countries according to national laws and international agreements. Typically, however, a patent application must include one or more claims that define the scope of protection that is being sought. A patent may include many claims, each of which defines a specific property right. Under the World Trade Organization's (WTO) TRIPS Agreement, patents should be available in WTO member states for any invention, in all fields of technology, provided they are new, involve an inventive step, and are capable of industrial application. Nevertheless, there are variations on what is patentable subject matter from country to country, also among WTO member states. TRIPS also provides that the term of protection available should be a minimum of twenty years. Definition. The word patent originates from the Latin patere, which means "to lay open" (for example, to make available for public inspection). It is a shortened version of the term letters patent, which was an open document or instrument issued by a monarch or government granting exclusive rights to a person, predating the modern patent system. Similar grants included land patents, which were land grants by early state governments in the US, and printing patents, a precursor of modern copyright. In modern usage, the term patent usually refers to the right granted to anyone who invents something new, useful and non-obvious. A patent is often referred to as a form of intellectual property right, an expression which is also used to refer to trademarks and copyrights, and which has proponents and detractors (see also Intellectual property § The term "intellectual property"). Some other types of intellectual property rights are also called patents in some jurisdictions: industrial design rights are called design patents in the US, plant breeders' rights are sometimes called plant patents, and utility models and Gebrauchsmuster are sometimes called petty patents or innovation patents. The additional qualification utility patent is sometimes used (primarily in the US) to distinguish the primary meaning from these other types of patents. Particular species of patents for inventions include biological patents, business method patents, chemical patents and software patents. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

A miscarriage of justice occurs when a grossly unfair outcome occurs in a criminal or civil proceeding, such as the conviction and punishment of a person for a crime they did not commit. Miscarriages are also known as wrongful convictions. Innocent people have sometimes ended up in prison for years before their conviction has eventually been overturned. They may be exonerated if new evidence comes to light or it is determined that the police or prosecutor committed some kind of misconduct at the original trial. In some jurisdictions this leads to the payment of compensation. Academic studies have found that the main factors contributing to miscarriages of justice are: eyewitness misidentification; faulty forensic analysis; false confessions by vulnerable suspects; perjury and lies stated by witnesses; misconduct by police, prosecutors or judges; and or ineffective assistance of counsel (for example, inadequate defense strategies by the defendant's or respondent's legal team). Some prosecutors' offices undertake conviction integrity reviews to prevent, identify, and correct wrongful convictions. Prevalence. There are two main methods for estimating the prevalence of wrongful convictions. Exoneration. The first is the number of exonerations where the guilty verdict has been vacated or annulled by a judge or higher court after new evidence has been brought forward proving the 'guilty' person is, in fact, innocent. Since 1989, the Innocence Project has helped overturn 375 convictions of American prisoners with updated DNA evidence. However, DNA testing occurs in only 5 to 10% of all criminal cases, and exonerations achieved by the Innocence Project are limited to murder and rape cases. This raises the possibility that there may be many more wrongful convictions for which there is no evidence available to exonerate the defendant. Studies cited by the Innocence Project estimate that between 2.3% and 5% of all prisoners in the U.S. are innocent. However, a more recent study looking at convictions in the state of Virginia during the 1970s and 1980s and matching them to later DNA analysis estimates a rate of wrongful conviction at 11.6%. A 2014 study published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences made a conservative estimate that 4.1% of inmates awaiting execution on death row in the United States are innocent. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Anti-miscegenation laws. In the United States, anti-miscegenation laws were passed by most states to prohibit interracial marriage, and in some cases also prohibit interracial sexual relations. Some such laws predate the establishment of the United States, some dating to the later 17th or early 18th century, a century or more after the complete racialization of slavery. Nine states never enacted such laws; 25 states had repealed their laws by 1967, when the United States Supreme Court ruled in Loving v Virginia that such laws were unconstitutional (via the 14th Amendment adopted in 1868) in the remaining 16 states. The term miscegenation was first used in 1863, during the American Civil War, by journalists to discredit the abolitionist movement by stirring up debate over the prospect of interracial marriage after the abolition of slavery. Typically defining mixed-race marriages or sexual relations as a felony, these laws also prohibited the issuance of marriage licenses and the solemnization of weddings between mixed-race couples and prohibited the officiation of such ceremonies. Sometimes, the individuals attempting to marry would not be held guilty of miscegenation itself, but felony charges of adultery or fornication would be brought against them instead. All anti-miscegenation laws banned marriage between whites and non-white groups, primarily black people, but often also Native Americans and Asian Americans. In many states, anti-miscegenation laws also criminalized cohabitation and sex between whites and non-whites. In addition, Oklahoma in 1908 banned marriage "between a person of African descent" and "any person not of African descent"; Louisiana in 1920 banned marriage between Native Americans and African Americans (and from 1920 to 1942, concubinage as well); and Maryland in 1935 banned marriages between black people and Filipinos. While anti-miscegenation laws are often regarded as a Southern phenomenon, most states of the Western United States and the Great Plains also enacted them. Although anti-miscegenation amendments were proposed in the United States Congress in 1871, 1912–1913, and 1928, a nationwide law against mixed-race marriages was never enacted. Prior to the California Supreme Court's ruling in Perez v Sharp (1948), no court in the United States had ever struck down a ban on interracial marriage. In 1967, the United States Supreme Court (the Warren Court) unanimously ruled in Loving v Virginia that anti-miscegenation laws are unconstitutional. After Loving, the remaining state anti-miscegenation laws were repealed; the last state to repeal its laws against interracial marriage was Alabama in 2000. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Voluntary dismissal is termination of a lawsuit by voluntary request of the plaintiff (the party who originally filed the lawsuit). A voluntary dismissal with prejudice (meaning the plaintiff is permanently barred from further litigating the same subject matter) is the modern descendant of the common law procedure known as retraxit. In the United States, voluntary dismissal in Federal court is subject to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Rule 41(a)'s full text can be found below. Simply stated, Rule 41(a) allows the plaintiff to make a dismissal as long as the defendant has not filed an answer or filed a motion for summary judgment. If the defendant has taken such action, dismissal is only proper under two circumstances: a. all defendants stipulate to dismissal; or b. the judge overseeing the case rules for the case to be dismissed Once the case has been voluntarily dismissed, if it is brought to court again a dismissal in this second case will mean the case can never again be brought back to court. If the defendant has a counterclaim, the case can only be dismissed if the counterclaim can still stand as its own case. Involuntary dismissal is the termination of a court case despite the plaintiff's objection. In United States federal courts, involuntary dismissal is governed by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) Rule 41(b). Involuntary dismissal is made by a defendant through a motion for dismissal, on grounds that plaintiff is not prosecuting the case, is not complying with a court order, or to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Involuntary dismissal can also be made by order of the judge when no defendant has made a motion to dismiss. Involuntary dismissal is a punishment that courts may use when a party to a case is not acting properly. Other punishments are found in FRCP Rule 11, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 38, sections 1927 and 1912 of Title 28 United States Code, and inherent powers of the court. Involuntary dismissal bars the case from being brought to court again, unless the judge says otherwise. State court rules may be different from the Federal rules and vary from state to state. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Incidental damages. Incidental damages refers to the type of legal damages that are reasonably associated with, or related to, actual damages. In American commercial law, incidental damages are a seller's commercially reasonable expenses incurred in stopping delivery or in transporting and caring for goods after a buyer's breach of contract, (UCC Sec. 2-710) or a buyer's expenses reasonably incurred, for example, searching for and obtaining substitute goods. (UCC Sec. 2-715(1)). … Injunction. An injunction is a legal and equitable remedy in the form of a special court order that compels a party to do or refrain from specific acts. "When a court employs the extraordinary remedy of injunction, it directs the conduct of a party, and does so with the backing of its full coercive powers." A party that fails to comply with an injunction faces criminal or civil penalties, including possible monetary sanctions and even imprisonment. They can also be charged with contempt of court. Counter Injunctions are injunctions that stop or reverse the enforcement of another injunction. Rationale. The injunction is an equitable remedy, that is, a remedy that originated in the English courts of equity. Like other equitable remedies, it has traditionally been given when a wrong cannot be effectively remedied by an award of money damages. (The doctrine that reflects this is the requirement that an injunction can be given only when there is "no adequate remedy at law.") Injunctions are intended to make whole again someone whose rights have been violated. Nevertheless, when deciding whether to grant an injunction, courts also take into account the interests of non-parties (that is, the public interest). When deciding whether to give an injunction, and deciding what its scope should be, courts give special attention to questions of fairness and good faith. One manifestation of this is that injunctions are subject to equitable defenses, such as laches and unclean hands. Injunctions are given in many different kinds of cases. They can prohibit future violations of the law, such as trespass to real property, infringement of a patent, or the violation of a constitutional right (for example, the free exercise of religion). Or they can require the defendant to repair past violations of the law. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

International rights. In 1957, in France negotiations took place concerned with the protection of new varieties. This led to the creation of the Union Internationale pour la Protection des Obtentions Végétales (UPOV) and adoption of the first text of the International Convention for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV Convention) in 1961. The purpose of the Convention was to ensure that the member states party to the Convention acknowledge the achievements of breeders of new plant varieties by making available to them an exclusive property right, on the basis of a set of uniform and clearly defined principles. The Convention was revised in Geneva in 1972, 1978 and 1991. Both the 1978 and the 1991 Acts set out a minimum scope of protection and offer member States the possibility of taking national circumstances into account in their legislation. Under the 1978 Act, the minimum scope of the plant breeder's right requires that the holder's prior authorisation is necessary for the production for purposes of commercial marketing, the offering for sale and the marketing of propagating material of the protected variety. The 1991 Act contains more detailed provisions defining the acts concerning propagating material in relation to which the holder's authorisation is required. The breeder's authorisation is also required in relation to any of the specified acts done with harvested material of the variety, unless the breeder has had reasonable opportunity to exercise their right in relation to the propagating material, or if not doing so could constitute an "Omega Threat" situation. Under that provision, for example, a flower breeder who protects their variety in the Netherlands could block importation of cut flowers of that variety into the Netherlands from Egypt, which does not grant plant breeders' rights, because the breeder had no opportunity to exercise any rights in Egypt. Member countries also have the option to require the breeder's authorization with respect to the specified acts as applied to products directly obtained from the harvested material (such as flour or oil from grain, or juice from fruit), unless the breeder has had reasonable opportunity to exercise their right in relation to the harvested material. The UPOV Convention also establishes a multilateral system of national treatment, under which citizens of any member state are treated as citizens of all member states for the purpose of obtaining plant breeders rights. It also sets up a multilateral priority filing system, under which an application for protection filed in one member state establishes a filing date for applications filed in all other member states within one year of that original filing date. This allows a breeder to file in any one member country within the one-year period required to preserve the novelty of their variety, and the novelty of the variety will still be recognized when the filing is done in other member countries within one year of the original filing date. However, if the applicant does not wish to make use of priority filing, he or she has four years in which to apply in all other member states, excepting the United States, for all species except tree and vine species in which case he or she has six years to make application. More information can be obtained in Article 10 (1) (b) of Council Regulation (EC) Number 2100 94 of July 27, 2004. The trigger to start the four- or six-year period is not actually the date on which the first filing is made but the date on which the variety was first commercialized. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Exoneration occurs when the conviction for a crime is reversed, either through demonstration of innocence, a flaw in the conviction, or otherwise. Attempts to exonerate convicts are particularly controversial in death penalty cases, especially where new evidence is put forth after the execution has taken place. The transitive verb, "to exonerate" can also mean to informally absolve one from blame. The term "exoneration" also is used in criminal law to indicate a surety bail bond has been satisfied, completed, and exonerated. The judge orders the bond exonerated; the clerk of court time stamps the original bail bond power and indicates exoneration as the judicial order. Based on DNA evidence. DNA evidence is a relatively new instrument of exoneration. The first convicted defendant from a United States prison to be released on account of DNA testing was David Vasquez, who had been convicted of homicide, in 1989. Recently, DNA evidence has been used to exonerate a number of persons either on death row or serving lengthy prison sentences. As of October 2003, the number of states authorizing convicts to request DNA testing on their behalf, since 1999, has increased from two to thirty. Access to DNA testing varies greatly by degree; post-conviction tests can be difficult to acquire. Organizations like the Innocence Project and Centurion are particularly concerned with the exoneration of those who have been convicted based on weak or faulty evidence, regardless of DNA evidence. As of October 2003, prosecutors of criminal cases must approve the defendant's request for DNA testing in certain cases. Monday, April 23, 2007, Jerry Miller became the 200th person in the United States exonerated through the use of DNA evidence. There is a national campaign in support of the formation of state Innocence Commissions, statewide entities that identify causes of wrongful convictions and develop state reforms that can improve the criminal justice system. As of December 2018, 362 people in the U.S. had been exonerated based on DNA tests. In nearly half of these cases, faulty forensics contributed to the original conviction. Per February 4, 2014 NPR article, Laura Sullivan cited Samuel Gross, a University of Michigan law professor stating that exonerations were on the rise, and not just because of DNA evidence. Only one-fifth of the exonerations last year relied on newly tested DNA, a little less than a third of exonerations occurred due to further investigation by law enforcement agencies. According to a 2020 study, DNA exonerations in rape cases "strongly suggest that the wrongful-conviction rate is significantly higher among black convicts than white convicts." --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Reverse censorship. Flooding the public, often through online social networks, with false or misleading information is sometimes called "reverse censorship". American legal scholar Tim Wu has explained that this type of information control, sometimes by state actors, can "distort or drown out disfavored speech through the creation and dissemination of fake news, the payment of fake commentators, and the deployment of propaganda robots." By media. Books Book censorship can be enacted at the national or sub-national level, and can carry legal penalties for their infraction. Books may also be challenged at a local, community level. As a result, books can be removed from schools or libraries, although these bans do not typically extend outside of that area. Films. Aside from the usual justifications of pornography and obscenity, some films are censored due to changing racial attitudes or political correctness in order to avoid ethnic stereotyping and or ethnic offense despite its historical or artistic value. One example is the still withdrawn "Censored Eleven" series of animated cartoons, which may have been innocent then, but are "incorrect" now. Film censorship is carried out by various countries. Film censorship is achieved by censoring the producer or restricting a state citizen. For example, in China the film industry censors LGBT related films. Filmmakers must resort in finding funds within international investors such as the “Ford Foundations” and or produce through an independent film company. Music. Music censorship has been implemented by states, religions, educational systems, families, retailers and lobbying groups – and in most cases they violate international conventions of human rights. Maps. Censorship of maps is often employed for military purposes. For example, the technique was used in former East Germany, especially for the areas near the border to West Germany in order to make attempts of defection more difficult. Censorship of maps is also applied by Google Maps, where certain areas are grayed out or blacked or areas are purposely left outdated with old imagery. Art. Art is loved and feared because of its evocative power. Destroying or oppressing art can potentially justify its meaning even more. British photographer and visual artist Graham Ovenden's photos and paintings were ordered to be destroyed by a London's magistrate court in 2015 for being "indecent" and their copies had been removed from the online Tate gallery. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

A party seeking summary judgment may refer to any evidence that would be admissible at trial, such as depositions (or deposition excerpts), party admissions, affidavits in support from witnesses, documents received during discovery (such as contracts, emails, letters, and certified government documents). The pieces of evidence should be accompanied by a declaration from the moving party that all copies of the documents are true and correct, including deposition excerpts. Each party may present to the court its view of applicable law by submitting a legal memorandum supporting, or opposing, the motion. The opposing party may also file its own summary-judgment motion (called a cross-motion), if the deadline still allows. The court may allow for oral argument of the lawyers, generally where the judge wishes to question the lawyers on issues in the case. Deadline for filing of the dispositive motions in the U.S. federal court system is set by the judge in the initial discovery plan order. If a party wants to file a motion or a cross-motion for summary judgment after the deadline, it needs to ask for leave of court. Normally, federal judges require valid reasons to alter case-management deadlines and only do so with reluctance. There are also freely accessible web search engines to assist parties in finding court decisions that can be cited as an example or analogy to resolve similar questions of law. Google Scholar is the biggest database of full-text state and federal court decisions that can be accessed without charge. These web search engines often allow one to select specific state courts to search. Summary judgment is awarded if the undisputed facts and the law make it clear that it would be impossible for one party to prevail if the matter were to proceed to trial. The court must consider all designated evidence in the light most favorable to the party opposing the summary judgment motion. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Punitive damages, or exemplary damages, are damages assessed in order to punish the defendant for outrageous conduct and or to reform or deter the defendant and others from engaging in conduct similar to that which formed the basis of the lawsuit. Although the purpose of punitive damages is not to compensate the plaintiff, the plaintiff will receive all or some of the punitive damages in award. Punitive damages are often awarded if compensatory damages are deemed an inadequate remedy. The court may impose them to prevent undercompensation of plaintiffs and to allow redress for undetectable torts and taking some strain away from the criminal justice system. Punitive damages are most important for violations of the law that are hard to detect. However, punitive damages awarded under court systems that recognize them may be difficult to enforce in jurisdictions that do not recognize them. For example, punitive damages awarded to one party in a US case would be difficult to get recognition for in a European court in which punitive damages are most likely to be considered to violate public policy doctrine. Because they are usually paid in excess of the plaintiff's provable injuries, punitive damages are awarded only in special cases, usually under tort law, if the defendant's conduct was egregiously insidious. Punitive damages cannot generally be awarded in contract disputes. The main exception is in insurance bad faith cases in the US if the insurer's breach of contract is alleged to be so egregious as to amount to a breach of the "implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing", and is therefore considered to be a tort cause of action eligible for punitive damages (in excess of the value of the insurance policy). National applications. United States. Punitive damages are a settled principle of common law in the United States. They are generally a matter of state law (although they can also be awarded under federal maritime law), and thus differ in application from state to state. In many states, including California and Texas, punitive damages are determined based on statute; elsewhere, they may be determined solely based on case law. Many state statutes are the result of insurance industry lobbying to impose "caps" on punitive damages; however, several state courts have struck down these statutory caps as unconstitutional. They are rare, occurring in only 6% of civil cases that result in a monetary award. Punitive damages are entirely unavailable under any circumstances in a few jurisdictions, including Nebraska, Puerto Rico, and Washington. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Moral rights are rights of creators of copyrighted works generally recognized in civil law jurisdictions and, to a lesser extent, in some common law jurisdictions. The moral rights include the right of attribution, the right to have a work published anonymously or pseudonymously, and the right to the integrity of the work. The preserving of the integrity of the work allows the author to object to alteration, distortion, or mutilation of the work that is "prejudicial to the author's honor or reputation". Anything else that may detract from the artist's relationship with the work even after it leaves the artist's possession or ownership may bring these moral rights into play. Moral rights are distinct from any economic rights tied to copyrights. Even if an artist has assigned his or her copyright rights to a work to a third party, he or she still maintains the moral rights to the work. Moral rights were first recognized in France and Germany, before they were included in the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works in 1928.  Canada recognizes moral rights (droits moraux) in its Copyright Act (Loi sur le droit d'auteur). The United States became a signatory to the convention in 1989, and incorporated a version of moral rights under its copyright law under Title 17 of the U.S. Code. The Berne convention is not a self-executing treaty, and the US Berne Convention Implementation Act excludes the US from the moral rights section. Some jurisdictions allow for the waiver of moral rights.  In the United States, the Visual Artists Rights Act of 1990 (VARA) recognizes moral rights, but applies only to a narrow subset of works of visual art. "For the purposes of VARA, visual art includes paintings, drawings, prints, sculptures, and photographs, existing in a single copy or a limited edition of 200 signed and numbered copies or fewer". A photograph must be taken only for exhibition purposes to be recognized under this subcategory. Independent art is not a focus of this waiver, for VARA only works in protecting artwork that can be considered as having "recognized stature"; Some of the items that are voided from VARA's protection include posters, maps, globes, motion pictures, electronic publications, and applied art. The VARA grants artists two specific rights: the right of attribution, and the right of integrity. The right of attribution allows an author to enforce the attribution of their work, prevent the misattribution of their work to another author, and permits the author to retain anonymous or pseudo-anonymous ownership of the work. The right of integrity does its best to prevent distortion or modification of their work, easing an artists' worries surrounding negative defamation directly applied to their work affecting their own personal, creative, or professional reputation through misrepresentation. In the United States, moral rights are not transferable, and end only with the life of the author. Authors may, however, waive their moral rights if this is done in writing. Some jurisdictions like Austria differentiate between narrow and wide moral rights. Whilst the former is about integrity of the work, the latter limits usages, which may harm the author's integrity. Some copyright timestamp services allow an author to publish allowed and disallowed usage intentions to prevent a violation of such wider moral rights. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Probation in criminal law is a period of supervision over an offender, ordered by the court often in lieu of incarceration. In some jurisdictions, the term probation applies only to community sentences (alternatives to incarceration), such as suspended sentences. In others, probation also includes supervision of those conditionally released from prison on parole. An offender on probation is ordered to follow certain conditions set forth by the court, often under the supervision of a probation officer. During the period of probation, an offender faces the threat of being incarcerated if found breaking the rules set by the court or probation officer. Offenders are ordinarily required to maintain law-abiding behavior, and may be ordered to refrain from possession of firearms, remain employed, participate in an educational program, abide by a curfew, live at a directed place, obey the orders of the probation officer, or not leave the jurisdiction. The probationer might be ordered as well to refrain from contact with the victims (such as a former partner in a domestic violence case), with potential victims of similar crimes (such as minors, if the instant offense involves child sexual abuse), or with known criminals, particularly co-defendants. Additionally, offenders can be subject to refrain from use or possession of alcohol and other drugs and may be ordered to submit alcohol or drug tests or participate in alcohol or drug psychological treatment. Offenders on probation might be fitted with an electronic tag (or monitor), which signals their movement to officials. Some courts permit defendants of limited means to perform community service in order to pay off their probation fines. History. The concept of probation, from the Latin, probatio, "testing", has historical roots in the practice of judicial reprieve. In English common law, prior to the advent of democratic rule, the courts could temporarily suspend the execution of a sentence to allow a criminal defendant to appeal to the monarch for a pardon. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Begging (also panhandling) is the practice of imploring others to grant a favor, often a gift of money, with little or no expectation of reciprocation. A person doing such is called a beggar or panhandler. Beggars may operate in public places such as transport routes, urban parks, and markets. Besides money, they may also ask for food, drinks, cigarettes or other small items. Internet begging is the modern practice of asking people to give money to others via the Internet, rather than in person. Internet begging may encompass requests for help meeting basic needs such as medical care and shelter, as well as requests for people to pay for vacations, school trips, and other things that the beggar wants but cannot comfortably afford. Beggars differ from religious mendicants in that some mendicants do not ask for money. Their subsistence is reciprocated by providing society with various forms of religious service, moral education, and preservation of culture. United States. In parts of San Francisco, California, aggressive panhandling is prohibited. In May 2010, police in the city of Boston started cracking down on panhandling in the streets in downtown, and were conducting an educational outreach to residents advising them not to give to panhandlers. The Boston police distinguished active solicitation, or aggressive panhandling, versus passive panhandling of which an example is opening doors at a store with a cup in hand but saying nothing. U. S. Courts have repeatedly ruled that begging is protected by the First Amendment's free speech provisions. On August 14, 2013, the U. S. Court of Appeals struck down a Grand Rapids, Michigan anti-begging law on free speech grounds. An Arcata, California law banning panhandling within twenty feet of stores was struck down on similar grounds in 2012. In Baltimore, Maryland, several non-profits have been working with the "squeegee kids" to get them off the streets instead of the police having to enforce the law and have the teens arrested. Canada. The province of Ontario introduced its Safe Streets Act in 1999 to restrict specific kinds of begging, particularly certain narrowly defined cases of "aggressive" or abusive begging. In 2001 this law was upheld under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The law was further upheld by the Court of Appeal for Ontario in January 2007. One response to the anti-panhandling laws which were passed was the creation of the Ottawa Panhandlers Union which fights for the political rights of panhandlers. The union is a shop of the Industrial Workers of the World. British Columbia enacted its own Safe Streets Act in 2004 which resembles the Ontario law. There are also critics in that province who oppose such laws. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

In law, a summary judgment (also judgment as a matter of law or summary disposition) is a judgment entered by a court for one party and against another party summarily, for example, without a full trial. Summary judgments may be issued on the merits of an entire case, or on discrete issues in that case. The formulation of the summary judgment standard is stated in somewhat different ways by courts in different jurisdictions. In the United States, the presiding judge generally must find there is "no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law." In England and Wales, the court rules for a party without a full trial when "the claim, defense or issue has no real prospect of success and there is no other compelling reason why the case or issue should be disposed of at a trial." In common-law systems, questions about what the law actually is in a particular case are decided by judges; in rare cases jury nullification of the law may act to contravene or complement the instructions or orders of the judge, or other officers of the court. A fact finder has to decide what the facts are and apply the law. In traditional common law the factfinder was a jury, but in many jurisdictions the judge now acts as the factfinder as well. It is the factfinder who decides "what really happened", and it is the judge who applies the law to the facts as determined by the factfinder, whether directly or by giving instructions to the jury. In the absence of an award of summary judgment (or some type of pretrial dismissal), a lawsuit ordinarily proceeds to trial, which is an opportunity for litigants to present evidence in an attempt to persuade the factfinder that they are saying "what really happened", and that, under the applicable law, they should prevail. The necessary steps before a case can get to trial include disclosing documents to the opponent by discovery, showing the other side the evidence, often in the form of witness statements. This process is lengthy, and can be difficult and costly. A party moving (applying) for summary judgment is attempting to avoid the time and expense of a trial when, in the moving party's view, the outcome is obvious. Typically this is stated as, when all the evidence likely to be put forward is such that no reasonable factfinder could disagree with the moving party, summary judgment is appropriate. Sometimes this will occur when there is no real dispute as to what happened, but it also frequently occurs when there is a nominal dispute but the non-moving party cannot produce enough evidence to support its position. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

General damages. General damages are monetary compensation for the non-monetary aspects of the specific harm suffered. These damages are sometimes termed 'pain, suffering and loss of amenity'. Examples of this include physical or emotional pain and suffering, loss of companionship, loss of consortium, disfigurement, loss of reputation, impairment of mental or physical capacity, hedonic damages or loss of enjoyment of life, etc. This is not easily quantifiable, and depends on the individual circumstances of the claimant. Judges in the United Kingdom base the award on damages awarded in similar previous cases. In 2012 the Court of Appeal of England and Wales noted that this court has not merely the power, but a positive duty, to monitor, and where appropriate to alter, the guideline rates for general damages in personal injury actions. General damages in England and Wales were increased by 10% for all cases where judgements were given after April 1, 2013, following changes to the options available to personal injury claimants wanting to cover the cost of their litigation. General damages are generally awarded only in claims brought by individuals, when they have suffered personal harm. Examples would be personal injury (following the tort of negligence by the defendant), or the tort of defamation. General damages in personal injury cases. The quantification of personal injury is not an exact science. In English law solicitors treat personal injury claims as "general damages" for pain and suffering and loss of amenity (PSLA). Solicitors quantify personal injury claims by reference to previous awards made by the courts which are "similar" to the case in hand. Judicial College "Guidelines for the Assessment of General Damages in Personal Injury Cases" are adjusted following periodic review of the awards which have been made by the courts since the previous review. The guidance solicitors will take into account to help quantify general damages are as hereunder: The age of the client. The age of the client is important especially when dealing with fatal accident claims or permanent injuries. The younger the injured victim with a permanent injury the longer that person has to live with the PSLA. As a consequence, the greater the compensation payment. In fatal accident claims, generally the younger deceased, the greater the dependency claim by the partner and children. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Industrial design right. An industrial design right is an intellectual property right that protects the visual design of objects that are purely utilitarian. An industrial design consists of the creation of a shape, configuration or composition of pattern or color, or combination of pattern and color in three-dimensional form containing aesthetic value. An industrial design can be a two- or three-dimensional pattern used to produce a product, industrial commodity or handicraft. Under the Hague Agreement Concerning the International Deposit of Industrial Designs, a WIPO-administered treaty, a procedure for an international registration exists. To qualify for registration, the national laws of most member states of WIPO require the design to be novel. An applicant can file for a single international deposit with WIPO or with the national office in a country party to the treaty. The design will then be protected in as many member countries of the treaty as desired. Design rights started in the United Kingdom in 1787 with the Designing and Printing of Linen Act and have expanded from there. Registering for an industrial design right is related to granting a patent. Law making. United States. U.S. design patents last fifteen years from the date of grant if filed on or after May 13, 2015 (fourteen years if filed before May 13, 2015) and cover the ornamental aspects of utilitarian objects. Objects that lack a use beyond that conferred by their appearance or the information they convey, may be covered by copyright—a form of intellectual property of much longer duration that exists as soon as a qualifying work is created. In some circumstances, rights may also be acquired in trade dress, but trade dress protection is akin to trademark rights and requires that the design have source significance or "secondary meaning." It is useful only to prevent source misrepresentations; trade dress protection. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Parole (also known as provisional release or supervised release) is a form of early release of a prison inmate where the prisoner agrees to abide by certain behavioral conditions, including checking-in with their designated parole officers, or else they may be rearrested and returned to prison. Originating from the French word parole ("speech, spoken words" but also "promise"), the term became associated during the Middle Ages with the release of prisoners who gave their word. This differs greatly from pardon, amnesty or commutation of sentence in that parolees are still considered to be serving their sentences, and may be returned to prison if they violate the conditions of their parole. Modern development. Alexander Maconochie, a Scottish geographer and captain in the Royal Navy, introduced the modern idea of parole when, in 1840, he was appointed superintendent of the British penal colonies in Norfolk Island, Australia. He developed a plan to prepare them for eventual return to society that involved three grades. The first two consisted of promotions earned through good behavior, labor, and study. The third grade in the system involved conditional liberty outside of prison while obeying rules. A violation would return them to prison and they would start all over again through the ranks of the three-grade process. He reformed its ticket of leave system, instituting what many consider to be the world's first parole system. Prisoners served indeterminate sentences from which they could be released early if they showed evidence of rehabilitation through participation in a graded classification system based on a unit of exchange called a mark. Prisoners earned marks through good behavior, lost them through bad behavior, and could spend them on passage to higher classification statuses ultimately conveying freedom. In an instance of multiple discovery, in 1846, Arnould Bonneville de Marsangy proposed the idea of parole (which he termed "preparatory liberations") to the Civil Tribunal at Reims.nusual punishment. United States. Early history. Penologist Zebulon Brockway introduced parole when he became superintendent of Elmira Reformatory in Elmira, New York. To manage prison populations and rehabilitate those incarcerated, he instituted a two-part strategy that consisted of indeterminate sentences and parole releases. This was significant in prison reform due to its implication that prisoners began their rehabilitation during incarceration, which would be recognizable by a parole board. It also provided a newfound emphasis on prisoners' protection from cruel and unusual punishment. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Perjury (also known as foreswearing) is the intentional act of swearing a false oath or falsifying an affirmation to tell the truth, whether spoken or in writing, concerning matters material to an official proceeding. Like most other crimes in the common law system, to be convicted of perjury one must have had the intention (mens rea) to commit the act and to have actually committed the act (actus reus). Further, statements that are facts cannot be considered perjury, even if they might arguably constitute an omission, and it is not perjury to lie about matters that are immaterial to the legal proceeding. Statements that entail an interpretation of fact are not perjury because people often draw inaccurate conclusions unwittingly or make honest mistakes without the intent to deceive. Individuals may have honest but mistaken beliefs about certain facts or their recollection may be inaccurate, or may have a different perception of what is the accurate way to state the truth. In some jurisdictions, no crime has occurred when a false statement is (intentionally or unintentionally) made while under oath or subject to penalty. Instead, criminal culpability attaches only at the instant the declarant falsely asserts the truth of statements (made or to be made) that are material to the outcome of the proceeding. It is not perjury, for example, to lie about one's age except if age is a fact material to influencing the legal result, such as eligibility for old age retirement benefits or whether a person was of an age to have legal capacity. Perjury is considered a serious offense, as it can be used to usurp the power of the courts, resulting in miscarriages of justice. In Canada, those who commit perjury are guilty of an indictable offense and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years. Perjury is a statutory offense in England and Wales. A person convicted of perjury is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding seven years, or to a fine, or to both. In the United States, the general perjury statute under federal law classifies perjury as a felony and provides for a prison sentence of up to five years. The California Penal Code allows for perjury to be a capital offense in cases causing wrongful execution. Perjury which caused the wrongful execution of another or in the pursuit of causing the wrongful execution of another is respectively construed as murder or attempted murder, and is normally itself punishable by execution in countries that retain the death penalty. Perjury is considered a felony in most U.S. states. However, prosecutions for perjury are rare. The rules for perjury also apply when a person has made a statement under penalty of perjury even if the person has not been sworn or affirmed as a witness before an appropriate official. An example is the US income tax return, which, by law, must be signed as true and correct under penalty of perjury (see 26 U.S.C. § 6065). Federal tax law provides criminal penalties of up to three years in prison for violation of the tax return perjury statute. See: 26 U.S.C. § 7206(1). In the United States, Kenya, Scotland and several other English-speaking Commonwealth nations, subornation of perjury, which is attempting to induce another person to commit perjury, is itself a crime. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

In law, a summary judgment (also judgment as a matter of law or summary disposition) is a judgment entered by a court for one party and against another party summarily, for example, without a full trial. Summary judgments may be issued on the merits of an entire case, or on discrete issues in that case. The formulation of the summary judgment standard is stated in somewhat different ways by courts in different jurisdictions. In the United States, the presiding judge generally must find there is "no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law." In England and Wales, the court rules for a party without a full trial when "the claim, defense or issue has no real prospect of success and there is no other compelling reason why the case or issue should be disposed of at a trial." In common-law systems, questions about what the law actually is in a particular case are decided by judges; in rare cases jury nullification of the law may act to contravene or complement the instructions or orders of the judge, or other officers of the court. A fact finder has to decide what the facts are and apply the law. In traditional common law the factfinder was a jury, but in many jurisdictions the judge now acts as the factfinder as well. It is the factfinder who decides "what really happened", and it is the judge who applies the law to the facts as determined by the factfinder, whether directly or by giving instructions to the jury. In the absence of an award of summary judgment (or some type of pretrial dismissal), a lawsuit ordinarily proceeds to trial, which is an opportunity for litigants to present evidence in an attempt to persuade the factfinder that they are saying "what really happened", and that, under the applicable law, they should prevail. The necessary steps before a case can get to trial include disclosing documents to the opponent by discovery, showing the other side the evidence, often in the form of witness statements. This process is lengthy, and can be difficult and costly. A party moving (applying) for summary judgment is attempting to avoid the time and expense of a trial when, in the moving party's view, the outcome is obvious. Typically this is stated as, when all the evidence likely to be put forward is such that no reasonable factfinder could disagree with the moving party, summary judgment is appropriate. Sometimes this will occur when there is no real dispute as to what happened, but it also frequently occurs when there is a nominal dispute but the non-moving party cannot produce enough evidence to support its position. A party may also move for summary judgment in order to eliminate the risk of losing at trial, and possibly avoid having to go through discovery (for example, by moving at the outset of discovery), by demonstrating to the judge, via sworn statements and documentary evidence, that there are no material factual issues remaining to be tried. If there is nothing for the factfinder to decide, then the moving party asks rhetorically, why have a trial? The moving party will also attempt to persuade the court that the undisputed material facts require judgment to be entered in its favor. In many jurisdictions, a party moving for summary judgment takes the risk that, although the judge may agree there are no material issues of fact remaining for trial, the judge may also find that it is the non-moving party that is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

At common law, damages are a remedy in the form of a monetary award to be paid to a claimant as compensation for loss or injury. To warrant the award, the claimant must show that a breach of duty has caused foreseeable loss. To be recognised at law, the loss must involve damage to property, or mental or physical injury; pure economic loss is rarely recognised for the award of damages. Compensatory damages are further categorized into special damages, which are economic losses such as loss of earnings, property damage and medical expenses, and general damages, which are non-economic damages such as pain and suffering and emotional distress. Rather than being compensatory, at common law damages may instead be nominal, contemptuous or exemplary. History. Among the Saxons, a monetary value called a weregild was assigned to every human being and every piece of property in the Salic Code. If property was stolen or someone was injured or killed, the guilty person had to pay the weregild as restitution to the victim's family or to the owner of the property. Proof of damages. Proximate cause. Recovery of damages by a plaintiff in a lawsuit is subject to the legal principle that damages must be approximately caused by the wrongful conduct of the defendant. This is known as the principle of proximate cause. This principle governs the recovery of all compensatory damages, whether the underlying claim is based on contract, tort, or both. Damages are likely to be limited to those reasonably foreseeable by the defendant. If a defendant could not reasonably have foreseen that someone might be hurt by their actions, there may be no liability. This rule does not usually apply to intentional torts (for example, tort of deceit), and also has stunted applicability to the quantum in negligence where the maxim 'Intended consequences are never too remote' applies: 'never' is inaccurate here but resorts to unforeseeable direct and natural consequences of an act. Expert testimony. It may be useful for the lawyers, the plaintiff and or the defendant to employ forensic accountants or someone trained in the relevant field of economics to give evidence on the value of the loss. In this case, they may be called upon to give opinion evidence as an expert witness. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Tambunan Statement, February 1995. Indigenous people of Asia met at Tambunan, Sabah, East Malaysia, to assert rights of self-determination, and to express concern about, and fear of, the threat unfamiliar 'western' intellectual property rights systems may pose to them. It was agreed, in the Tambunan Statement on the Protection and Conservation of Indigenous Knowledge: For the Indigenous peoples of Asia, the intellectual property rights system is not only a very new concept but it is also very western...with  intellectual property rights, alien laws will be devised to exploit the Indigenous knowledge and  resources of the Indigenous peoples. Suva Statement, April 1995. Participants from the independent countries and "nonautonomous colonized territories" of the Pacific region met in Suva, Fiji, to discuss internationally dominant intellectual property rights regimes, and at that meeting they resolved to support the Kari Oca, Mataatua, Julayinbul, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, and Tambunan initiatives(above). In their statement, the Suva Statement on Indigenous Peoples Knowledge and Intellectual Property Rights, participants: Declare Indigenous peoples are willing to share our knowledge with humanity provided we determine when, where and how it is used: at present the international system does not recognise or respect our past, present and potential contribution... Seek repatriation of Indigenous peoples  resources already held in external collections, and seek compensation and royalties from commercial developments resulting from these resources… Strengthen the capacities of Indigenous peoples to maintain their oral traditions, and encourage initiatives by Indigenous peoples to record their knowledge... according to their customary access procedures. Kimberley Declaration, August 2002. Indigenous people from around the world attended an international Indigenous peoples' summit on sustainable development in Khoi-San Territory, Kimberley, South Africa, in August 2002, where they reaffirmed previous declarations and statements, and, among other matters, declared: Our traditional knowledge systems must be respected, promoted and protected; our collective intellectual property rights must be guaranteed and ensured. Our traditional knowledge is not in the public domain; it is collective, cultural and intellectual property protected under our customary law. Unauthorized use and misappropriation of traditional knowledge is theft. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Indefinite imprisonment or indeterminate imprisonment is the imposition of a sentence by imprisonment with no definite period of time set during sentencing. It was imposed by certain nations in the past, before the drafting of the United Nations Convention against Torture (CAT). The length of an indefinite imprisonment was determined during imprisonment based on the inmate's conduct. The inmate could have been returned to society or be kept in prison for life. In theory, an indefinite prison sentence could be very short, or it could be a life sentence if no decision is made after sentencing to lift the term. In many cases, either a minimum term is imposed or the maximum that can be served is the maximum allowable by law in the jurisdiction for the particular offense. Rationale. The main reason for imposing indefinite (as opposed to fixed) sentences is to protect the community. An offender can then be kept behind bars until it is determined the offender would not pose any danger to society. In some places, indefinite sentences have been around for a long time. In other jurisdictions, they have been introduced more recently. United States. Some US states have various forms of indefinite sentencing, and many have effective indeterminate sentencing with evaluation-based parole. The US federal prison system does not allow parole for any crimes committed after 1987. Therefore, a sentence of life imprisonment means that the prisoner will be incarcerated for life without parole. Indeterminate sentencing existed in every U.S. state from the 1930s to the mid-1970s. The Model Penal Code, developed in the 1950s, focused on offenders' treatment needs rather than on retribution. Generous amounts of good conduct time could be awarded by prison officials. By the mid-1970s, indeterminate sentencing was under attack, as arguments were made that racial and other invidious biases influenced officials; that rehabilitative treatment programs were ineffective; and that broad, standardless discretion denied constitutional due process and permitted undue leniency that undermined the deterrent effects of sanctions. Federal supervised release is also sometimes cited as an example of indeterminate sentencing. Canada. In Canada, an inmate classified as a dangerous offender can be given an indefinite prison sentence. That means the offender is at risk for causing a "serious personal injury." United Kingdom. England and Wales. Imprisonment for public protection was a form of indefinite sentence that was used in England and Wales from 2005 until 2012, in addition to the traditional life sentence. The imprisonment for public protection sentence was abolished in 2012, but offenders already serving that sentence remained in prison. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Misprision of felony is a form of misprision, and an offense under the common law of England that is no longer active in many common law countries. Where it was or is active, it is classified as a misdemeanor. It consists of failing to report knowledge of a felony to the appropriate authorities. Exceptions were made for close family members of the felon and where the disclosure would tend to incriminate him of that offense or another. With the development of modern law, this crime has been discarded in many jurisdictions, and is generally only applied against persons placed in a special position of authority or responsibility. In this case, the offense of misfeasance in public office or malfeasance in public office may be considered instead. For example, corrections officers who stand idly by while drug trafficking occurs within the prison may be prosecuted for this crime. It has been abolished in: England, Wales and Scotland, as part of the criminal law reforms that abolished the distinction between misdemeanor and felony—Criminal Law Act 1967, section 1, Northern Ireland, with the Criminal Law Act (Northern Ireland) 1967— section 1, Ireland, with the Criminal Law Act 1997, section 3, and New South Wales, Australia, with the Crimes Act 1900—section 341. In some cases, misprision has been replaced by a more tightly-defined statutory offense. For example, in England and Wales, the 1967 Act states that a person who has information which might lead to the prosecution of an arrestable offense—and who agrees to accept consideration in exchange for not disclosing it—is liable on conviction on indictment to imprisonment. United States federal law. Misprision of felony remains an offense under United States federal law having been enacted in 1790 and codified in 1909 under 18 U.S.C. § 4: Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. U.S. courts have held that misprision of a felony requires active concealment of a known felony rather than simple failure to report it. If one knows that one is a target of a federal investigation, it is illegal under the Sarbanes–Oxley Act to erase one's browser history intentionally. Khairullozhan Matanov was prosecuted for erasing computer records about his friends, Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev; he pleaded guilty to a lesser included offense in 2015. The federal misprision of felony statute is usually used only in prosecutions against defendants who have a special duty to report a crime, such as a government official. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Request for admission. A request for admission (sometimes also called a request to admit) is a set of statements sent from one litigant to an adversary, for the purpose of having the adversary admit or deny the statements or allegations therein. Requests for admission are part of the discovery process in a civil case. In the U.S. federal court system, they are governed by Rule 36 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Basic structure. A request for admission is a list of questions which are similar in some respects to interrogatories, but different in form and purpose. Each "question" is in the form of a declarative statement which the answering party must then either admit, deny, or state in detail why they can neither admit nor deny the truthfulness of the statement (for example for lack of knowledge, etcetera). This effectively puts the admissions in the form of true-false questions. For example, in a case involving an automobile accident, the plaintiff might include in their request a statement such as "Defendant Smith was driving a blue Dodge Caravan on the morning of the accident". Under Rule 36(a)(5) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the answering party may also object to the request, and state the reason for their objection, so long as the objection is not solely because the request would present a genuine issue of fact for trial. Rule 36(a)(1) limits the types of requests to be limited to (A) facts, the application of law to fact, or opinions about either; and (B) the genuineness of any described documents. However, the rule places no limits on the number of requests which may be made of either litigant. State court rules, however, may be stricter than this. Notably, under Rule 36(a)(3), requests for admission are automatically deemed admitted in U.S. federal courts if the opponent fails to timely respond or object. The opponent bears the burden of moving for relief from its failure to respond and providing a legitimate excuse for why it did not respond earlier. Some U.S. states have reversed the burden as set forth in the federal rules, such that the party propounding the RFAs must follow up with a motion to have RFAs deemed admitted. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

oint and several liability. Where two or more persons are liable in respect of the same liability, in most common law legal systems they may either be: jointly liable, or severally liable, or jointly and severally liable. Joint liability. If parties have joint liability, then they are each liable up to the full amount of the relevant obligation. So if a married couple takes a loan from a bank, the loan agreement will normally provide that they are to be "jointly liable" for the full amount. If one party dies, disappears, or is declared bankrupt, the other individual remains fully liable. Accordingly, the bank may sue all living co-promisors for the full amount. However, in suing, the creditor has only one cause of action; for example, the creditor can sue for each debt only once. If, for example, there are three partners, and the creditor sues all of them for the outstanding loan amount and one of them pays the liability, the creditor cannot recover further amounts from the partners who did not contribute to the liability. Several liability. The converse is several or proportionate liability, where the parties are liable for only their respective obligations. A common example of several liability is in syndicated loan agreements, which will normally provide that each bank is severely liable for its own part of the loan. If one bank fails to advance its agreed part of the loan to the borrower, then the borrower can sue only that bank, and the other banks in the syndicate have no liability. Joint and several liability. Under joint and several liability or all sums, a claimant may pursue an obligation against any one party as if they were jointly liable and it becomes the responsibility of the defendants to sort out their respective proportions of liability and payment. This means that if the claimant pursues one defendant and receives payment, that defendant must then pursue the other obligors for a contribution to their share of the liability. Joint and several liability is most relevant in tort claims, whereby a plaintiff may recover all the damages from any of the defendants regardless of their individual share of the liability. The rule is often applied in negligence cases, though it is sometimes invoked in other areas of law. In the United States, 46 of the 50 states have a rule of joint and several liability, although in response to tort reform efforts, some have limited the applicability of the rule. About two dozen have reformed the rule, with several (Alaska, Arizona, Kansas, Utah, Vermont, Oklahoma, and Wyoming) abolishing. In some instances it is abolished except where the defendants "act in concert". --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Indigenous intellectual property is a term used in national and international forums to describe intellectual property that is "collectively owned" by various Indigenous peoples, and by extension, their legal rights to protect specific such property. This property includes cultural knowledge of their groups and many aspects of their cultural heritage and knowledge, including that held in oral history. In Australia, the term Indigenous cultural and intellectual property, abbreviated as ICIP, is commonly used. There have been various efforts made since the late 20th century towards providing some kind of legal protection for indigenous intellectual property in colonized countries, including a number of declarations made by various conventions of Indigenous peoples. The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) was created in 1970 to promote and protect intellectual property across the world by cooperating with countries as well as international organizations. The UN's Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), signed by 144 countries in 2007, includes several clauses relating specifically to the protection of intellectual property of Indigenous peoples. Disputes around indigenous property include several cases involving the Māori people of New Zealand. Background. Indigenous intellectual property is a concept that has developed as an analog to predominantly western concepts of intellectual property law, and has been promoted by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), as part of a broader effort by the United Nations (UN) to see the world's indigenous, intangible cultural heritage better valued and better protected against perceived, ongoing mistreatment, as they are not adequately covered by western law. Indigenous intellectual property rights relate to the legal rights to protect specific such property, which includes cultural knowledge of their groups, aspects of their cultural heritage in the visual arts, literature, and performing arts, as well as science and traditional medicines. It may include knowledge held in oral history. International bodies such as the UN have become involved in the issue, making more specific declarations that intellectual property also includes cultural property such as historical sites, artifacts, designs, language, ceremonies, and performing arts in addition to artwork and literature. Nation states across the world have experienced difficulties reconciling local indigenous laws and cultural norms with a predominantly western legal system, in many cases leaving Indigenous peoples' individual and communal intellectual property rights largely unprotected. The Native American Rights Fund (NARF) has set out several goals around treaty law and intellectual property, with board member Professor Rebecca Tsosie stressing the importance of these property rights being held collectively, not by individuals: The long-term goal is to actually have a legal system, and certainly a treaty could do that, that acknowledges two things. Number one, it acknowledges that Indigenous peoples are peoples with a right to self-determination that includes governance rights over all property belonging to the Indigenous people. And, number two, it acknowledges that Indigenous cultural expressions are a form of intellectual property and that traditional knowledge is a form of intellectual property, but they are collective resources – so not any one individual can give away the rights to those resources. The tribal nations actually own them collectively. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

An execution warrant (also called death warrant or black warrant) is a writ that authorizes the execution of a condemned person. An execution warrant is not to be confused with a "license to kill", which operates like an arrest warrant but with deadly force instead of arrest as the end goal. United States. In the United States either a judicial or executive official designated by law issues an execution warrant. This is done when a person, in trial court proceedings, has been sentenced to death, after trial and conviction, and usually after appeals are exhausted. Normally when a death warrant is signed and an execution date is set, the condemned person is moved from his or her death row cell to a death watch cell, which is typically located adjacent to the execution chamber. Usually, the government agency charged with carrying out an execution, normally the state's Department of Corrections or the Federal Bureau of Prisons in federal cases, has a limited time frame, normally about 60 days, from the date the warrant is signed, to complete the execution process, or the warrant expires and the condemned person is returned to the death row cell, awaiting another execution date. Stays of execution can be ordered in state cases by the Governor of the State, a trial court, a state appeals court or state Supreme Court or a court in the federal judiciary (including the United States Supreme Court). In federal death penalty cases the trial court, appeals courts, the United States Supreme Court and President may grant a stay of execution. In all cases, the stay may be issued at any time, even when the condemned is being prepared for execution. … Cruel and unusual punishment is a phrase in common law describing punishment that is considered unacceptable due to the suffering, pain, or humiliation it inflicts on the person subjected to the sanction. The precise definition varies by jurisdiction, but typically includes punishments that are arbitrary, unnecessary, overly severe compared to the crime, or not generally accepted in society. History. The words cruel and unusual punishment were first used in the English Bill of Rights 1689. They were later also adopted in the United States by the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution (ratified 1791) and in the British Leeward Islands (1798). Very similar words, "No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment", appear in Article 5 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on December 10, 1948. The right under a different formulation is also found in Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (1950) and in Article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966). The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1982) also contains this fundamental right in section 12 and it is to be found in Article 4 (quoting the European Convention verbatim) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (2000). It is also found in Article 16 of the Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1984), and in Article 40 of the Constitution of Poland (1997). The Constitution of the Marshall Islands, in the sixth section of its Bill of Rights (Article 2), prohibits "cruel and unusual punishment", which it defines as: the death penalty; torture; "inhuman and degrading treatment"; and "excessive fines or deprivations". --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Compensation for wrongful conviction Article 14(6) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) states that when a miscarriage of justice has occurred and the defendant's conviction has been reversed or they have been pardoned, "the person who has suffered punishment as a result of such conviction shall be compensated according to law". The right to compensation is also authorized by Article 3 of Protocol Number 7 to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and Article 10 of the American Convention on Human Rights. Four broad approaches allow for the payment of compensation following a miscarriage of justice: tort liability in common law; claims for a breach of constitutional or human rights; statutory relief where specific legislation exists to compensate individuals who are wrongfully convicted; and non-statutory relief by way of ex-gratia schemes based on the largesse of the government. In a study of different approaches to the payment of compensation in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, only the US and the UK have statutory schemes in place. In the United States, the federal government, the District of Columbia, and 38 states have such legislation on their statutes. Twelve states have no laws requiring compensation to be paid. However, each state differs widely in regard to eligibility requirements, maximum payments, issues concerning factual innocence, the burden of proof, the behavior of the claimant which contributed to the (now overturned) conviction, and the claimant's prior criminal history. In some states, statutes of limitations also apply. The significant benefits of statutory schemes is that they provide money and services in compensation to individuals who have been wrongfully convicted without regard to fault or blame; they do not require claimants to prove how the prosecution or police committed their mistakes.  Implications. The concept of miscarriage of justice has important implications for standard of review, in that an appellate court will often only exercise its discretion to correct a plain error when a miscarriage of justice (or "manifest injustice") would otherwise occur. In recent years, DNA evidence has been used to clear many people falsely convicted. The risk of miscarriages of justice is often cited as a cause to eliminate the death penalty. When condemned persons are executed before they are determined to have been wrongly convicted, the effect of that miscarriage of justice is irreversible. Wrongly executed people nevertheless occasionally receive posthumous pardons—which essentially void the conviction—or have their convictions quashed. Even when a wrongly convicted person is not executed, years in prison can have a substantial, irreversible effect on the person and their family. The risk of miscarriage of justice is therefore also an argument against long sentences, like a life sentence, and cruel prison conditions. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Conduct of depositions Depositions usually take place at the office of the court reporter or in the office of one of the law firms involved in a case. However, depositions are also sometimes taken at a witness's workplace or home, or in a nearby hotel's conference room. Generally, the deposition is attended by the person who is to be deposed, their attorney, court reporter, and other parties in the case who can appear personally or be represented by their counsels. Any party to the action and their attorneys have the right to be present and to ask questions. Prior to taking a deposition, the court reporter administers the same oath or affirmation that the deponent would take if the testimony were being given in court in front of a judge and jury. Thereafter, the court reporter makes a verbatim digital or stenographic record of all that is said during the deposition, in the same manner that witness testimony is recorded in court. Some jurisdictions allow stenomask technology in lieu of traditional stenographic equipment, although many jurisdictions still prohibit stenomask because of its disconcerting effect on some lawyers and witnesses. Attorneys for the deposing litigant are often present, although this is not required in all jurisdictions. The attorney who has ordered the deposition begins questioning of the deponent (this is referred to as "direct examination" or "direct" for short). Since nods and gestures cannot be recorded, the witness is instructed to answer all questions aloud. After the direct examination, other attorneys in attendance have an opportunity to cross-examine the witness. The first attorney may ask more questions at the end, in re-direct, which may be followed by re-cross. During the course of the deposition, one attorney or another may object to questions asked. In most jurisdictions, only two types of objections are allowed: The first is to assert a privilege and the second is to object to the form of the question asked. Objections to form are frequently used to signal the witness to be careful in answering the question. Since the judge is not present, all other objections, in particular those involving the rules of evidence, are generally preserved until trial. They still can be made sometime at the deposition to indicate the serious problem to judge and witness, but the witness must answer the question despite these objections. If the form objection is made, the opposite party still has the right to re-phrase the same question and ask it again. Indeed, in Texas, lawyers were so aggressively using objections to indirectly coach their witnesses on the record that all objections outside four narrow categories are now prohibited and making such prohibited objections waives all objections to the question or answer at issue. California is the major "outlier" on deposition objections; under the California Civil Discovery Act as enacted in 1957 and heavily revised in 1986, most objections must be given on the record at the deposition (and must be specific as to the objectionable nature of the question or response) or they are permanently waived. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Trespassers. The Occupiers' Liability Act 1984 (and in Scotland the Occupiers' Liability (Scotland) Act 1960) requires all owners of property to take reasonable steps to make their premises safe for anyone who enters them, even those who enter as trespassers, if they are aware of a risk on the premises. However, the doctrine of volenti has been applied to cases where a trespasser exposed themselves deliberately to risk: Titchener v British Railways Board, Ratcliff v McConnell, and Tomlinson v Congleton Borough Council. In the first case (decided before the Occupier's Liability Act was passed), a girl who had trespassed on the railway was hit by a train. The House of Lords ruled that the fencing around the railway was adequate, and the girl had voluntarily accepted the risk by breaking through it. In the second case, a student who had broken into a closed swimming-pool and injured himself by diving into the shallow end was similarly held responsible for his own injuries. The third case involved a man who dived into a shallow lake, despite the presence of "No Swimming" signs; the signs were held to be an adequate warning. Drunk drivers. The defense of volenti is now excluded by statute where a passenger was injured as a result of agreeing to take a lift from a drunk car driver. However, in a well-known case of Morris v Murray (Court of Appeal), volenti was held to apply to a drunk passenger, who accepted a lift from a drunk pilot. The pilot died in the resulting crash and the passenger who was injured, sued his estate. Although he drove the pilot to the airfield (which was closed at the time) and helped him start the engine and tune the radio, he argued that he did not freely and voluntarily consent to the risk involved in flying. The Court of Appeal held that there was consent: the passenger was not so drunk as to fail to realize the risks of taking a lift from a drunk pilot, and his actions leading up to the flight demonstrated that he voluntarily accepted those risks. Rescuers. For reasons of policy, the courts are reluctant to criticize the behavior of rescuers. A rescuer would not be considered volens if: He was acting to rescue persons or property endangered by the defendant’s negligence; He was acting under a compelling legal, social or moral duty; and His conduct in all circumstances was reasonable and a natural consequence of the defendant’s negligence. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

A geographical indication (GI) is a name or sign used on products which corresponds to a specific geographical location or origin (for example, a town, region, or country). The use of a geographical indication, as an indication of the product's source, is intended as a certification that the product possesses certain qualities, is made according to traditional methods, or enjoys a good reputation due to its geographical origin. Article 22.1 of the TRIPS Agreement defines geographical indications as "...indications which identify a good as originating in the territory of a Member , or a region or locality in that territory, where a given quality, reputation or other characteristic of the good is essentially attributable to its geographical origin." Appellation d'origine contrôlée ('Appellation of origin') is a sub-type of geographical indication where quality, method, and reputation of a product originate from a strictly defined area specified in its intellectual property right registration. History. Governments have protected trade names and trademarks of food products identified with a particular region since at least the end of the 19th century, using laws against false trade descriptions or passing off, which generally protects against suggestions that a product has a certain origin, quality, or association when it does not. In such cases, the limitation on competitive freedoms which results from the grant of a monopoly of use over a geographical indication is justified by governments either by consumer protection benefits or by producer protection benefits. One of the first GI systems is the one used in France from the early part of the 20th century known as appellation d'origine contrôlée (AOC). Items that meet geographical origin and quality standards may be endorsed with a government-issued stamp which acts as official certification of the origins and standards of the product. Examples of products that have such "appellations of origin" include Gruyère cheese (from Switzerland) and many French wines. Under "Champagnerparagraph " of the 1919 Treaty of Versailles, Germany was forbidden from using allied geographical indications on products, which in particular affected the German "cognac" and "champagne" industries, as the French considered the terms misleading references to places in France. Since then, the terms "Weinbrand" and "Sekt" have been used instead. Geographical indications have long been associated with the concept of terroir and with Europe as an entity, where there is a tradition of associating certain food products with particular regions. Under European Union Law, the protected designation of origin framework which came into effect in 1992 regulates the following systems of geographical indications: "Protected designation of origin" (PDO), "protected geographical indication" (PGI), and Traditional Specialities Guaranteed" (TSG). --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

A miscarriage of justice occurs when a grossly unfair outcome occurs in a criminal or civil proceeding, such as the conviction and punishment of a person for a crime they did not commit. Miscarriages are also known as wrongful convictions. Innocent people have sometimes ended up in prison for years before their conviction has eventually been overturned. They may be exonerated if new evidence comes to light or it is determined that the police or prosecutor committed some kind of misconduct at the original trial. In some jurisdictions this leads to the payment of compensation. Academic studies have found that the main factors contributing to miscarriages of justice are: eyewitness misidentification; faulty forensic analysis; false confessions by vulnerable suspects; perjury and lies stated by witnesses; misconduct by police, prosecutors or judges; and or ineffective assistance of counsel (for example, inadequate defense strategies by the defendant's or respondent's legal team). Some prosecutors' offices undertake conviction integrity reviews to prevent, identify, and correct wrongful convictions. Prevalence. There are two main methods for estimating the prevalence of wrongful convictions. Exoneration. The first is the number of exonerations where the guilty verdict has been vacated or annulled by a judge or higher court after new evidence has been brought forward proving the 'guilty' person is, in fact, innocent. Since 1989, the Innocence Project has helped overturn 375 convictions of American prisoners with updated DNA evidence. However, DNA testing occurs in only 5 to 10% of all criminal cases, and exonerations achieved by the Innocence Project are limited to murder and rape cases. This raises the possibility that there may be many more wrongful convictions for which there is no evidence available to exonerate the defendant. Studies cited by the Innocence Project estimate that between 2.3% and 5% of all prisoners in the U.S. are innocent. However, a more recent study looking at convictions in the state of Virginia during the 1970s and 1980s and matching them to later DNA analysis estimates a rate of wrongful conviction at 11.6%. A 2014 study published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences made a conservative estimate that 4.1% of inmates awaiting execution on death row in the United States are innocent. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Juvenile offenders. The death penalty for juvenile offenders (criminals aged under 18 years at the time of their crime although the legal or accepted definition of juvenile offender may vary from one jurisdiction to another) has become increasingly rare. Considering the age of majority is not 18 in some countries or has not been clearly defined in law, since 1990 ten countries have executed offenders who were considered juveniles at the time of their crimes: The People's Republic of China (PRC), Bangladesh, Democratic Republic of Congo, Iran, Iraq, Japan, Nigeria, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, the United States, and Yemen. China, Pakistan, the United States, Yemen and Saudi Arabia have since raised the minimum age to 18. Amnesty International has recorded 61 verified executions since then, in several countries, of both juveniles and adults who had been convicted of committing their offenses as juveniles. The PRC does not allow for the execution of those under 18, but child executions have reportedly taken place. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, which forbids capital punishment for juveniles under article 37(a), has been signed by all countries and subsequently ratified by all signatories with the exception of the United States (despite the US Supreme Court decisions abolishing the practice). The UN Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights maintains that the death penalty for juveniles has become contrary to a jus cogens of customary international law. A majority of countries are also party to the U.N. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (whose Article 6.5 also states that "Sentence of death shall not be imposed for crimes committed by persons below eighteen years of age..."). Methods. The following methods of execution have been used by various U.S. states: Lethal injection,  Electrocution and gas inhalation (some U.S. states, but only if the prisoner requests it or if lethal injection is unavailable), and Inert gas asphyxiation (Some U.S. states, Oklahoma, Mississippi, Alabama) --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

In law, interrogatories (also known as requests for further information) are a formal set of written questions propounded by one litigant and required to be answered by an adversary in order to clarify matters of fact and help to determine in advance what facts will be presented at any trial in the case. Use. Interrogatories are used to gain information from the other party relevant to the issues in a lawsuit. The law and issues will differ depending upon the facts of a case and the laws of the jurisdiction in which a lawsuit is filed. For some types of cases there are standard sets of interrogatories available that cover the essential facts, and may be modified for the case in which they are used. When a lawsuit is filed, the pleadings filed by the parties are intended to let the other parties know what each side intends to prove at trial, and what legal case they have to answer. However, in most cases, the parties will require additional information to fully understand each other's legal and factual claims. The discovery process, including the use of interrogatories, can help the parties obtain that information from each other. For an example of how interrogatories may be used, in a motor vehicle accident lawsuit, an injured plaintiff typically asserts that the defendant driver committed the tort of negligence in causing the accident. To prove negligence, the law requires the injured plaintiff to show that the driver owed them a duty of care and breached it, causing the injury. Assuming that the defendant did not dispute driving a vehicle that was involved in the accident that injured the plaintiff, the case would come down to whether the driver drove in accordance with the standard of a reasonable driver, and whether the injured person's injuries are a foreseeable consequence of the driving. The parties may use interrogatories to seek information, including concessions as to how the accident occurred, from each other. The injured plaintiff might serve interrogatories on the defendant driver seeking information that would support the plaintiff's theory of the case. If the plaintiff is alleging that the defendant was speeding, the plaintiff might ask the defendant to state the speed of the defendant's vehicle at the time of the accident. If the plaintiff alleges that the defendant failed to control the car properly or failed to pay proper attention to the road and other vehicles, the plaintiff could ask interrogatory questions that would help prove those allegations or require disclosure of the basis of any denial of negligence by the defendant. The driver may have a defense to those allegations, perhaps if the accident occurred at low speed, and was unavoidable (maybe due to some third party intervention). The injured person may, however, argue that the driver was still responsible (perhaps the driver should have used the horn of the vehicle to alert the third party), or there may be other allegations. The defense may similarly use interrogatories to help build legal and factual defenses to the plaintiff's case. Continuing with the example of a car accident, the defendant may seek information or concessions from the plaintiff that would suggest that a different driver was partially or wholly responsible for the accident, or that under the facts the accident was unavoidable despite the proper exercise of care. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Respondeat superior (Latin: "let the master answer"; plural: respondeant superiores) is a doctrine that a party is responsible for (has vicarious liability for) acts of their agents. For example, in the United States, there are circumstances when an employer is liable for acts of employees performed within the course of their employment. This rule is also called the master-servant rule, recognized in both common law and civil law jurisdictions. In a broader scope, respondeat superior is based upon the concept of vicarious liability. In common law. The concept of respondeat superior has its roots in ancient Rome. At the time, the concept applied to slaves, as that was the meaning of what has been translated as servants, and it applied if the slave could not pay himself for the act. It was later expanded to apply to not only slaves but also animals and family members of the master of a family. In 1698, the doctrine was mentioned in dicta by Sir Holt in the English case of Jones v Hart, (1698). In the US, it was discussed in the case of Wright v Wilcox, (1838), in which a boy climbed on a wagon driven by the defendant's servant, who drove his horses faster, which caused the boy to be thrown and injured. The judge ruled that the master was not responsible under respondeat superior because the servant had acted in a way in driving the horses that the master had not assented to and so it was not within the scope of his employment. US Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. opined in 1891, "It is hard to explain why a master is liable to the extent he is for the negligent acts of one who, at the time, really is his servant, acting within the general scope of his employment. Probably master and servant are 'feigned to be all one person' by a fiction". He was of the view that the doctrine was in opposition to common sense. In 1916, the British attorney Thomas Baty wrote that the doctrine, which he called a "deep-pocket theory", was "derived from an inconsiderate use of precedents and a blind reliance on the slightest word of an eminent judge, and from the mistaken notion that his flights of imagination, were actual decided cases". When applied to physical torts, an employer–employee relationship must be established (novicarious liability is established for work performed as an independent contractor) and the act must be committed within the scope of employment (substantially within time and geographical limits, job description and at least with partial intent to further employer's business). Historically, the doctrine was applied in master–servant and employer–employee relationships. When an employee or a servant commits a civil wrong against a third party, the employer or master could be liable for the acts of the servant or employee when the acts are committed within the scope of the relationship. The third party could proceed against the servant and master; that is, the employee and employer. The action against the employee would be based on his conduct. The action against the employer is based on the theory of vicarious liability in which a party can be held liable for the acts of a different party. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

A database right is a sui generis property right, comparable to but distinct from copyright, that exists to recognise the investment that is made in compiling a database, even when this does not involve the "creative" aspect that is reflected by copyright. Such rights are often referred to in the plural: database rights. The TRIPS Agreement requires that copyright protection extends to databases and other compilations if they constitute intellectual creation by virtue of the selection or arrangement of their contents, even if some or all of the contents do not themselves constitute materials protected by copyright. Many countries act in accordance with this requirement, as databases are protected by copyright if this condition is met, and there is no separate intellectual property right protecting databases (or any aspects of them) that do not meet the condition for copyright protection. The database right extends protection over databases which does not depend on the condition required for copyright protection, and is recognised only in a small number of jurisdictions, most notably the European Union. The International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (also known as ITPGRFA, International Seed Treaty or Plant Treaty), is a comprehensive international agreement in harmony with the Convention on Biological Diversity, which aims at guaranteeing food security through the conservation, exchange and sustainable use of the world's plant genetic resources for food and agriculture (PGRFA), the fair and equitable benefit sharing arising from its use, as well as the recognition of farmers' rights. It was signed in 2001 in Madrid, and entered into force on 29 June 2004. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, is a state-sanctioned practice of deliberately killing a person as a punishment for an actual or supposed crime, usually following an authorized, rule-governed process to conclude that the person is responsible for violating norms that warrant said punishment. The sentence ordering that an offender is to be punished in such a manner is known as a death sentence, and the act of carrying out the sentence is known as an execution. A prisoner who has been sentenced to death and awaits execution is condemned and is commonly referred to as being "on death row". Crimes that are punishable by death are known as capital crimes, capital offences, or capital felonies, and vary depending on the jurisdiction, but commonly include serious crimes against the person, such as murder, mass murder, aggravated cases of rape (often including child sexual abuse), terrorism, aircraft hijacking, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide, along with crimes against the state such as attempting to overthrow government, treason, espionage, sedition, and piracy, among other crimes. Also, in some cases, acts of recidivism, aggravated robbery, and kidnapping, in addition to drug trafficking, drug dealing, and drug possession, are capital crimes or enhancements. However, states have also imposed punitive executions, for an expansive range of conduct, for political or religious beliefs and practices, for a status beyond one's control, or without employing any significant due process procedures. Judicial murder is the intentional and premeditated killing of an innocent person by means of capital punishment. For example, the executions following the show trials in Russia during the Great Purge of 1937–1938 were an instrument of political repression. Etymologically, the term capital (literally "of the head", derived via the Latin capitalis from caput, "head") refers to execution by beheading, but executions are carried out by many methods, including hanging, shooting, lethal injection, stoning, electrocution, and gassing. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Compounding a felony was an offense under the common law of England and was classified as a misdemeanor. It consisted of a prosecutor or victim of an offense accepting anything of value under an agreement not to prosecute, or to hamper the prosecution of, a felony. To "compound", in this context, means to come to a settlement or agreement. It is not compounding for the victim to accept an offer to return stolen property, or to make restitution, as long as there is no agreement not to prosecute. Under the common law, compounding a felony was punishable as a misdemeanor. Many states have enacted statutes that punish the offense as a felony. Compounding a misdemeanor is not a crime. However, an agreement not to prosecute a misdemeanor is unenforceable as being contrary to public policy. Compounding has been abolished in England and Wales, in Northern Ireland, in the Republic of Ireland, and in New South Wales. In each of these cases, it has been replaced by a statutory offense. Mischief or malicious mischief is the name for a criminal offense that is defined differently in different legal jurisdictions. While the wrongful acts will often involve what is popularly described as vandalism, there can be a legal differentiation between vandalism and mischief. The etymology of the word comes from Old French meschief, which means "misfortune", from meschever, "to end badly". Malfeasance in office is often grounds for a just cause removal of an elected official by statute or recall election. Malfeasance in office contrasts with "misfeasance in office", which is the commission of a lawful act, done in an official capacity, that improperly causes harm; and "nonfeasance in office," which is the failure to perform an official duty. An exact definition of malfeasance in office is difficult: many highly regarded secondary sources (such as books and commentaries) compete over its established elements based on reported cases. This confusion has arisen from the courts where no single consensus definition has arisen from the relatively few reported appeal-level cases involving malfeasance in office. A miscarriage of justice occurs when a grossly unfair outcome occurs in a criminal or civil proceeding, such as the conviction and punishment of a person for a crime they did not commit. Miscarriages are also known as wrongful convictions. Innocent people have sometimes ended up in prison for years before their conviction has eventually been overturned. They may be exonerated if new evidence comes to light or it is determined that the police or prosecutor committed some kind of misconduct at the original trial. In some jurisdictions this leads to the payment of compensation. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Federal law. Discovery in the United States is unique compared to other common law countries. In the United States, discovery is mostly performed by the litigating parties themselves, with relatively minimal judicial oversight. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure guide discovery in the U.S. federal court system. Most state courts follow a similar version based upon the FRCP, Chapter V "Depositions & Discovery" . According to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff must initiate a conference between the parties after the complaint was served to the defendants, to plan for the discovery process. The parties should attempt to agree on the proposed discovery schedule, and submit a proposed Discovery Plan to the court within 14 days after the conference. After that, the main discovery process begins which includes: initial disclosures, depositions, interrogatories, request for admissions (RFA) and request for production of documents (RFP). In most federal district courts, the formal requests for interrogatories, request for admissions and request for production are exchanged between the parties and not filed with the court. Parties, however, can file motions to compel discovery if responses are not received within the FRCP time limit. Parties can file a motion for a protective order if the discovery requests become unduly burdensome or for the purpose of harassment. In federal criminal prosecutions, discovery rights originate from a number of important Supreme Court decisions and statutes, the most important of which are, Brady v Maryland, (1963), which requires a prosecuting attorney to disclose to a defendant any material which is potentially exculpatory or that would impeach the credibility of a prosecution witness. Brady also applies to evidence that would mitigate the defendant's sentence if a defendant is convicted. Jencks v United States, (1957), and the Jencks Act, which requires federal prosecutors to produce any witness statement in the government's possession that relates to the subject of the witness' testimony, if that witness will testify against the defendant. Giglio v United States, (1972) and the resulting Giglio rule, which requires that any deal with a witness that might call the witness's credibility into question must be disclosed in court. As a consequence, any plea bargain or deal made by the prosecutor with a witness in exchange for testimony should be disclosed to the defense as part of the discovery process. The formal discovery process for federal criminal prosecutions is outlined in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 16. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

The eggshell rule (also thin skull rule, papier-mâché-plaintiff rule, or talem qualem rule) is a well-established legal doctrine in common law, used in some tort law systems, with a similar doctrine applicable to criminal law. The rule states that, in a tort case, the unexpected frailty of the injured person is not a valid defense to the seriousness of any injury caused to them. Law. This rule holds that a tortfeasor is liable for all consequences resulting from their tortious (usually negligent) activities leading to an injury to another person, even if the victim suffers an unusually high level of damage (for example due to a pre-existing vulnerability or medical condition). The eggshell skull rule takes into account the physical, social, and economic attributes of the plaintiff which might make them more susceptible to injury. It may also take into account the family and cultural environment. The term implies that if a person had a skull as delicate as that of the shell of an egg, and a tortfeasor who was unaware of the condition injured that person's head, causing the skull unexpectedly to break, the defendant would be held liable for all damages resulting from the wrongful contact, even if the tortfeasor did not intend to cause such a severe injury. In criminal law, the general maxim is that the defendant must "take their victims as they find them", as echoed in the judgment of Lord Justice Lawton in R for example Blaue (1975), in which the defendant was held responsible for killing his victim, despite his contention that her refusal of a blood transfusion constituted an intervening act. The doctrine is applied in all areas of torts – intentional torts, negligence, and strict liability cases – as well as in criminal law. There is no requirement of physical contact with the victim – if a trespasser's wrongful presence on the victim's property so terrifies the victim that he has a fatal heart attack, the trespasser will be liable for the damages stemming from his original tort. The foundation for this rule is based primarily on policy grounds. The courts do not want the defendant or accused to rely on the victim's own vulnerability to avoid liability. The thin skull rule is not to be confused with the related crumbling skull rule in which the plaintiff suffers from a detrimental position (from a prior injury, for instance) pre-existent to the occurrence of the present tort. In the "crumbling skull" rule, the prior condition is only to be considered with respect to distinguishing it from any new injury arising from the present tort – as a means of apportioning damages in such a way that the defendant would not be liable for placing the plaintiff in a better position than they were in prior to the present tort. Example. In an example, a person who has osteogenesis imperfecta (also known as "brittle bone syndrome") is more likely to be injured in a motor vehicle accident. If the person with OI is hit from behind in a motor vehicle collision and suffers medical damages (such as clavicle fracture), it would not be a valid defense to state that the osteogenesis imperfecta was the cause of the fracture. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Limitations and exceptions. In many jurisdictions, copyright law makes exceptions to these restrictions when the work is copied for the purpose of commentary or other related uses. United States copyright law does not cover names, titles, short phrases or listings (such as ingredients, recipes, labels, or formulas). However, there are protections available for those areas copyright does not cover, such as trademarks and patents. Idea–expression dichotomy and the merger doctrine. The idea–expression divide differentiates between ideas and expression, and states that copyright protects only the original expression of ideas, and not the ideas themselves. This principle, first clarified in the 1879 case of Baker v Selden, has since been codified by the Copyright Act of 1976 at 17 U.S.C. § 102(b). The first-sale doctrine and exhaustion of rights. Copyright law does not restrict the owner of a copy from reselling legitimately obtained copies of copyrighted works, provided that those copies were originally produced by or with the permission of the copyright holder. It is therefore legal, for example, to resell a copyrighted book or CD. In the United States this is known as the first-sale doctrine, and was established by the courts to clarify the legality of reselling books in second-hand bookstores. Some countries may have parallel importation restrictions that allow the copyright holder to control the aftermarket. This may mean for example that a copy of a book that does not infringe copyright in the country where it was printed does infringe copyright in a country into which it is imported for retailing. The first-sale doctrine is known as exhaustion of rights in other countries and is a principle which also applies, though somewhat differently, to patent and trademark rights. It is important to note that the first-sale doctrine permits the transfer of the particular legitimate copy involved. It does not permit making or distributing additional copies. In Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons Incorporated, in 2013, the United States Supreme Court held in a 6–3 decision that the first-sale doctrine applies to goods manufactured abroad with the copyright owner's permission and then imported into the US without such permission. The case involved a plaintiff who imported Asian editions of textbooks that had been manufactured abroad with the publisher-plaintiff's permission. The defendant, without permission from the publisher, imported the textbooks and resold them on eBay. The Supreme Court's holding severely limits the ability of copyright holders to prevent such importation. In addition, copyright, in most cases, does not prohibit one from acts such as modifying, defacing, or destroying one's own legitimately obtained copy of a copyrighted work, so long as duplication is not involved. However, in countries that implement moral rights, a copyright holder can in some cases successfully prevent the mutilation or destruction of a work that is publicly visible. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

In Canada, England, and Wales, certain convicted persons may be designated as dangerous offenders and subject to a longer, or indefinite, term of imprisonment in order to protect the public. Other countries, including parts of the United States have similar provisions of law. Worldwide. United States. In the United States, "Dangerous offender" statutes are defined on a state-by-state basis and are applied at sentencing such that the enhanced "dangerous offender" sentence stems from the original illegal activity. A person under "dangerous offender" sentencing is typically held for a minimum term that coincides with the sentence the person would have received without the "dangerous offender" sentence, and thereafter is subject to review of the person's state of mind as a determination of eligibility for release. Alternatively, a person can be civilly committed if a judicial hearing determines that a concurrent mental disorder makes the person likely to remain dangerous because of a lack of self-control. This issue arose in the case of sex offenders in Kansas v Hendricks (1997) in which the court did allow limited commitment; the court reversed itself on the very same issue in Kansas v Crane (2002) imposing much stricter commitment standards and a higher burden of proof. Various state and federal sex offender registry laws impose additional post-conviction requirements for sex offenders. Canada. In Canadian criminal law, a convicted person who is designated a dangerous offender may be subjected to an indeterminate prison sentence, whether or not the crime carries a life sentence. This does not apply to convictions of first degree murder, second degree murder, high treason, and treason. The purpose of the legislation is to detain offenders who are deemed too dangerous to be released into society because of their violent tendencies, but whose sentences would not necessarily keep them incarcerated under other legislation, such as the Correctional and Conditional Release Act. Under subsection 761(1) of the Criminal Code, the Parole Board of Canada is required to review the case of an offender with a dangerous offender label after seven years, and parole may be granted as circumstances warrant, but the offender would remain under supervision indefinitely. After the initial review, the Parole Board must conduct subsequent reviews every two years. According to Corrections Canada, on average 24 dangerous offenders are admitted to the Canadian prison system each year. Paul Bernardo is one well-known dangerous offender. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Vandalism is the action involving deliberate destruction of or damage to public or private property. The term includes property damage, such as graffiti and defacement directed towards any property without permission of the owner. The term finds its roots in an Enlightenment view that the Germanic Vandals were a uniquely destructive people. As a crime. Private citizens commit vandalism when they willfully damage or deface the property of others or the commons. Some vandalism may qualify as culture jamming or sniggling: it is thought by some to be artistic in nature even though carried out illegally or without the property owner's permission. Examples include at least some graffiti art, billboard "liberation", and possibly crop circles. Criminal vandalism takes many forms. Graffiti on public property is common in many inner cities as part of a gang culture, where they might be used as territorial markers. More serious forms of vandalism that may take place during public unrest such as rioting can involve the willful destruction of public and private property. Vandalism per se is sometimes considered one of the less serious common crimes, but it can become quite serious and distressing when committed extensively, violently, or as an expression of hatred and intimidation. In response, local governments have adopted various legal measures to prevent vandalism, but research has shown that the conventional strategies employed by the government in response to at least unapproved graffiti are not the most effective. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Discovery, in the law of common law jurisdictions, is a pre-trial procedure in a lawsuit in which each party, through the law of civil procedure, can obtain evidence from the other party or parties by means of discovery devices such as interrogatories, requests for production of documents, requests for admissions and depositions. Discovery can be obtained from non-parties using subpoenas. When a discovery request is objected to, the requesting party may seek the assistance of the court by filing a motion to compel discovery. History Discovery evolved out of a unique feature of early equitable pleading procedure before the English Court of Chancery: among various requirements, a plaintiff's bill in equity was required to plead "positions". These were statements of evidence that the plaintiff assumed to exist in support of his pleading and which he believed lay within the knowledge of the defendant. They strongly resembled modern requests for admissions, in that the defendant was required to plead only whether they were true or false. At some point between the reign of Elizabeth I (1558-1603) and the late seventeenth century, positions were gradually replaced by interrogatories: written questions which the defendant was required to truthfully respond to under oath in his answer to the bill, based on information within his own personal knowledge as well as documents in his possession. But back then, interrogatories could only elicit admissible evidence (not the broader modern standard of "reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence") and could only request evidence in support of the plaintiff's case, not either side's case (that is, they could not ask for evidence which the defendant intended to use in support of his defenses and was otherwise entirely irrelevant to the plaintiff's case). Even worse, this was purely a one-way procedure, because interrogatories could only be pleaded as part of a bill (a pleading initiating a suit in equity). A defendant who needed to obtain evidence in support of his defenses had to file a cross-bill against the plaintiff to plead his own interrogatories. Discovery did not exist at common law, but its availability in equity attracted litigants in actions at law (legal proceedings in the common law courts). They began to file bills in equity to obtain discovery in aid of actions at law. This led to another innovation in the mid-15th century: the bill to perpetuate testimony of a potential witness. This was for witnesses whose advanced age or poor health implied they would not survive to testify at the trial of an action at law. In this type of proceeding, the parties merely pleaded written interrogatories which were read out loud to the witness in a closed proceeding without parties or counsel present. The witness's attendance was secured by service of a subpoena ad testificandum at least 14 days before the date of the examination. In London, the examinations took place before a master or an examiner in Chancery Lane. Outside of London, the parties' attorneys were supposed to jointly stipulate to a group of lay commissioners (typically four, though only two were needed for a quorum) who could not be interested persons (for example, parties or their lawyers) and were usually country gentlemen. Once agreed upon, the court would grant them authority to examine witnesses by way of dedimus potestatem. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

An intentional tort is a category of torts that describes a civil wrong resulting from an intentional act on the part of the tortfeasor (alleged wrongdoer). The term negligence, on the other hand, pertains to a tort that simply results from the failure of the tortfeasor to take sufficient care in fulfilling a duty owed, while strict liability torts refers to situations where a party is liable for injuries no matter what precautions were taken. Background. As a matter of public policy, damages available for intentional torts tend to be broader and more generous than for negligent torts. To preserve individual well-being and overall social welfare, society generally wishes to deter its members from intentionally attacking each other. For example, in the United States, it is easier to get punitive damages (damages above and beyond compensatory damages) if one can prove that the tort was intentional. Similarly, in most Australian jurisdictions, intentional torts are not included in civil liability legislation, thus excluding the threshold of injury and damages payouts from various legislated limitations and caps. But it is harder to prove intentional torts because as with many felony crimes, one must prove subjective elements involving the content of the defendant's mind, and defendants do not always express their harmful intent out loud or in writing. Intentional torts are most directly contrasted with negligent torts. The key difference between the two categories of tort is that the plaintiff must prove the additional element that the defendant acted with the specific intent to perform (for example, acted with a mental state of intentionally performing) the act that was the proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries (so-called malice), as opposed to simply violating a general duty of care as plaintiffs must prove in suits for negligence. "The concept of 'intention' in the intentional torts does not require that defendants know that their acts will result in harm to the plaintiffs. Defendants must know only that their acts will result in certain consequences." Under the doctrine of the transferred intent, the plaintiff may instead prove that the defendant intended to commit any intentional tort against any person rather than the specific injury that actually occurred. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Registration. In all countries where the Berne Convention standards apply, copyright is automatic, and need not be obtained through official registration with any government office. Once an idea has been reduced to tangible form, for example by securing it in a fixed medium (such as a drawing, sheet music, photograph, a videotape, or a computer file), the copyright holder is entitled to enforce their exclusive rights. However, while registration is not needed to exercise copyright, in jurisdictions where the laws provide for registration, it serves as prima facie evidence of a valid copyright and enables the copyright holder to seek statutory damages and attorney's fees. (In the US, registering after an infringement only enables one to receive actual damages and lost profits.) A widely circulated strategy to avoid the cost of copyright registration is referred to as the poor man's copyright. It proposes that the creator send the work to themself in a sealed envelope by registered mail, using the postmark to establish the date. This technique has not been recognized in any published opinions of the United States courts. The United States Copyright Office says the technique is not a substitute for actual registration. The United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office discusses the technique and notes that the technique (as well as commercial registries) does not constitute dispositive proof that the work is original or establish who created the work. Fixing. The Berne Convention allows member countries to decide whether creative works must be "fixed" to enjoy copyright. Article 2, Section 2 of the Berne Convention states: "It shall be a matter for legislation in the countries of the Union to prescribe that works in general or any specified categories of works shall not be protected unless they have been fixed in some material form." Some countries do not require that a work be produced in a particular form to obtain copyright protection. For instance, Spain, France, and Australia do not require fixation for copyright protection. The United States and Canada, on the other hand, require that most works must be "fixed in a tangible medium of expression" to obtain copyright protection. US law requires that the fixation be stable and permanent enough to be "perceived, reproduced or communicated for a period of more than transitory duration". Similarly, Canadian courts consider fixation to require that the work be "expressed to some extent at least in some material form, capable of identification and having a more or less permanent endurance". Note this provision of US law: section c) Effect of Berne Convention.—No right or interest in a work eligible for protection under this title may be claimed by virtue of, or in reliance upon, the provisions of the Berne Convention, or the adherence of the United States thereto. Any rights in a work eligible for protection under this title that derive from this title, other Federal or State statutes, or the common law, shall not be expanded or reduced by virtue of, or in reliance upon, the provisions of the Berne Convention, or the adherence of the United States thereto. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

A suspended sentence is a sentence on conviction for a criminal offense, the serving of which the court orders to be deferred in order to allow the defendant to perform a period of probation. If the defendant does not break the law during that period and fulfills the particular conditions of the probation, the sentence is usually considered fulfilled. If the defendant commits another offense or breaks the terms of probation, the court can order the sentence to be served, in addition to any sentence for the new offense. United States. In the United States, it is common practice for judges to hand down suspended sentences to first-time offenders who have committed a minor crime, and for prosecutors to recommend suspended sentences as part of a plea bargain. They are often given to mitigate the effect of penalties. In some jurisdictions, the criminal record of the guilty party will still carry the offense, even after probation is adequately served. It is important to note about a suspended imposition of a sentence is that it does not completely remove the conviction from a person's record. While it may be hidden from the public, it is not hidden from law enforcement. In other cases, the process of deferred adjudication prevents the conviction from appearing on a person's criminal record, once probation has been completed. In the federal system, judges' authority to suspend sentences has been abolished by the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, through the United States Sentencing Commission, and upheld by Mistretta v United States. United Kingdom. A custodial sentence may, at the discretion of the sentencing judge or magistrates, be suspended for up to two years if the term of imprisonment is under two years and the offender agrees to comply with court requirements, which may include a curfew, performing unpaid work, and or engaging in an appropriate rehabilitation programme. In 2017, 5% of convictions resulted in a suspended sentence, compared to 7% immediate custodial sentences. The sentencing guidelines indicate that it is appropriate for a sentence to be suspended if there is strong personal mitigation and or a realistic prospect of rehabilitation, but suspended sentences should not be used for offenders who pose a risk to the public or who have a history of poor compliance with court orders. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Theft is the act of taking another person's property or services without that person's permission or consent with the intent to deprive the rightful owner of it. The word theft is also used as a synonym or informal shorthand term for some crimes against property, such as larceny, robbery, embezzlement, extortion, blackmail, or receiving stolen property. In some jurisdictions, theft is considered to be synonymous with larceny, while in others, theft is defined more narrowly. Someone who carries out an act of theft may be described as a "thief" (plural: thieves). Theft is the name of a statutory offense in California, Canada, England and Wales, Hong Kong, Northern Ireland, the Republic of Ireland, and the Australian states of South Australia and Victoria. Elements. The actus reus of theft is usually defined as an unauthorized taking, keeping, or using of another's property which must be accompanied by a mens rea of dishonesty and the intent to permanently deprive the owner or rightful possessor of that property or its use. For example, if X goes to a restaurant and, by mistake, takes Y's scarf instead of her own, she has physically deprived Y of the use of the property (which is the actus reus) but the mistake prevents X from forming the mens rea (for example, because she believes that she is the owner, she is not dishonest and does not intend to deprive the "owner" of it) so no crime has been committed at this point. But if she realizes the mistake when she gets home and could return the scarf to Y, she will steal the scarf if she dishonestly keeps it (theft by finding). Note that there may be civil liability for the torts of trespass to chattels or conversion in either eventuality. By jurisdiction. The following are the countries with the most cases of theft, as well as the respective rates per 100,000 people, according to the United Nations in 2018. United States. In the United States, crimes must be prosecuted in the jurisdiction in which they occurred. Although federal and state jurisdiction may overlap, even when a criminal act violates both state and federal law, in most cases only the most serious offenses are prosecuted at the federal level. The federal government has criminalized certain narrow categories of theft that directly affect federal agencies or interstate commerce. The Model Penal Code, promulgated by the American Law Institute to help state legislatures update and standardize their laws, includes categories of theft by unlawful taking or by unlawfully disposing of property, theft by deception (fraud), theft by extortion, theft by failure to take measures to return lost or mislaid or mistakenly delivered property, theft by receipt of stolen property, theft by failing to make agreed disposition of received funds, and theft of services. Although many U.S. states have retained larceny as the primary offense, some have now adopted theft provisions. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

A lawsuit is a proceeding by a party or parties against another in the civil court of law. The archaic term "suit in law" is found in only a small number of laws still in effect today. The term "lawsuit" is used in reference to a civil action brought by a plaintiff (a party who claims to have incurred loss as a result of a defendant's actions) requests a legal remedy or equitable remedy from a court. The defendant is required to respond to the plaintiff's complaint. If the plaintiff is successful, judgment is in the plaintiff's favor, and a variety of court orders may be issued to enforce a right, award damages, or impose a temporary or permanent injunction to prevent an act or compel an act. A declaratory judgment may be issued to prevent future legal disputes. A lawsuit may involve dispute resolution of private law issues between individuals, business entities or non-profit organizations. A lawsuit may also enable the state to be treated as if it were a private party in a civil case, as plaintiff, or defendant regarding an injury, or may provide the state with a civil cause of action to enforce certain laws. The conduct of a lawsuit is called litigation. The plaintiffs and defendants are called litigants and the attorneys representing them are called litigators. The term litigation may also refer to a criminal procedure. Rules of procedure and complications. Rules of criminal or civil procedure govern the conduct of a lawsuit in the common law adversarial system of dispute resolution. Procedural rules are constrained and informed by separate statutory laws, case laws, and constitutional provisions that define the rights of the parties to a lawsuit (see especially due process), though the rules generally reflect this legal context on their face. The details of the procedure differ greatly from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, and often from court to court even within the same jurisdiction. These rules of the particular procedures are very important for litigants to know, because the litigants are the ones who dictate the timing and progression of the lawsuit. Litigants are responsible to obtain the suited result and the timing of reaching this result. Failure to comply with the procedural rules may result in serious limitations that can affect the ability of one to present claims or defenses at any subsequent trial, or even promote the dismissal of the lawsuit altogether. Though the majority of lawsuits are settled before ever reaching trial, they can still be very complicated to litigate. This is particularly true in federal systems, where a federal court may be applying state law (for example the Erie doctrine, for example in the United States), or vice versa. It is also possible for one state to apply the law of another in cases where additionally it may not be clear which level (or location) of court actually has jurisdiction over the claim or personal jurisdiction over the defendant, or whether the plaintiff has standing to participate in a lawsuit. About 98 percent of civil cases in the United States federal courts are resolved without a trial. Domestic courts are also often called upon to apply foreign law, or to act upon foreign defendants, over whom they may not even have the ability to even enforce a judgment if the defendant's assets are theoretically outside their reach. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

The defense of property is a common method of justification used by defendants who argue that they should not be held liable for any loss and injury that they have caused because they were acting to protect their property. English law. Generally, in addition to the right of self-defense at common law, section 3 of the Criminal Law Act 1967 states that, A person may use such force as is reasonable in the circumstances in the prevention of crime or in arresting offenders or suspects. Insofar as an attack on property is a crime, reasonable force may be used to prevent the crime or to arrest the offender, whether it be theft of a sum of money or the damage of an object. In many cases of robbery and burglary, the threat will be to both a person and property, and this combination can be a powerful defense. In AG's Reference (No 2 of 1983) (1984) Lane CJ held that a defendant who manufactured ten petrol bombs to defend his shop during the Toxteth Riots could set up the defence of showing that he possessed an explosive substance "for a lawful purpose" if he could show he acted to protect himself or his family or property by means he believed reasonably necessary to meet the attack. In theory, the defense of property by itself cannot reasonably provide a justification for inflicting serious injury, but there are a number of cases approving considerable violence to arrest criminals threatening property. Although R v Scully (1824) held that it was not justifiable to shoot an intruder merely to arrest him, on the facts, "the life of the prisoner was threatened, and if he considered his life in actual danger, he was justified in shooting the deceased as he had done; but if, not considering his own life in danger, he rashly shot this man, who was only a trespasser, he would be guilty of manslaughter." See self-defense (Australia) for a comparative view on whether the use of excessive force causing death should give rise to a mitigatory defense and "Reform" below. In Mead and Belt's Case (1823). Holroyd J instructed a jury that violence could not be used against a civil trespasser, adding: "But, the making an attack upon a dwelling, and especially at night, the law regards as equivalent to an assault on a man's person; for a man's house is his castle and therefore, in the eye of the law, it is equivalent to an assault." --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

A copyright is a type of intellectual property that gives its owner the exclusive right to copy, distribute, adapt, display, and perform a creative work, usually for a limited time. The creative work may be in a literary, artistic, educational, or musical form. Copyright is intended to protect the original expression of an idea in the form of a creative work, but not the idea itself. A copyright is subject to limitations based on public interest considerations, such as the fair use doctrine in the United States. Some jurisdictions require "fixing" copyrighted works in a tangible form. It is often shared among multiple authors, each of whom holds a set of rights to use or license the work, and who are commonly referred to as rights holders. These rights frequently include reproduction, control over derivative works, distribution, public performance, and moral rights such as attribution. Copyrights can be granted by public law and are in that case considered "territorial rights". This means that copyrights granted by the law of a certain state, do not extend beyond the territory of that specific jurisdiction. Copyrights of this type vary by country; many countries, and sometimes a large group of countries, have made agreements with other countries on procedures applicable when works "cross" national borders or national rights are inconsistent. Typically, the public law duration of a copyright expires 50 to 100 years after the creator dies, depending on the jurisdiction. Some countries require certain copyright formalities to establish a copyright, others recognize copyright in any completed work, without a formal registration. When the copyright of a work expires, it enters the public domain. History. Background. The concept of copyright developed after the printing press came into use in Europe in the 15th and 16th centuries. The printing press made it much cheaper to produce works, but as there was initially no copyright law, anyone could buy or rent a press and print any text. Popular new works were immediately reset and re-published by competitors, so printers needed a constant stream of new material. Fees paid to authors for new works were high, and significantly supplemented the incomes of many academics. Printing brought profound social changes. The rise in literacy across Europe led to a dramatic increase in the demand for reading material. Prices of reprints were low, so publications could be bought by poorer people, creating a mass audience. In German language markets before the advent of copyright, technical materials, like popular fiction, were inexpensive and widely available; it has been suggested this contributed to Germany's industrial and economic success. After copyright law became established (in 1710 in England and Scotland, and in the 1840s in German-speaking areas) the low-price mass market vanished, and fewer, more expensive editions were published; distribution of scientific and technical information was greatly reduced. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Mandatory sentencing requires that offenders serve a predefined term for certain crimes, commonly serious and violent offenses. Judges are bound by law; these sentences are produced through the legislature, not the judicial system. They are instituted to expedite the sentencing process and limit the possibility of irregularity of outcomes due to judicial discretion. Mandatory sentences are typically given to people who are convicted of certain serious and or violent crimes, and require a prison sentence. Mandatory sentencing laws vary across nations; they are more prevalent in common law jurisdictions because civil law jurisdictions usually prescribe minimum and maximum sentences for every type of crime in explicit laws. Mandatory sentencing laws often target "moral vices" (such as alcohol, sex, drugs) and crimes that threaten a person's livelihood. The idea is that there are some crimes that are so heinous, there is no way to accept the offender back into the general population without first punishing them sufficiently. Some crimes are viewed as serious enough to require an indefinite removal from society by a life sentence, or sometimes capital punishment. It is viewed as a public service to separate these people from the general population, as it is assumed that the nature of the crime or the frequency of violation supersedes the subjective opinion of a judge. Remedying the irregularities in sentencing that arise from judicial discretion is supposed to make sentencing more fair and balanced. In Australia and the United Kingdom, sentencing has been heavily influenced by judicial idiosyncrasies. Individual judges have a significant effect on the outcome of the case, sometimes leading the public to believe that a sentence reflects more about the judge than the offender. Subsequently, creating stricter sentencing guidelines would promote consistency and fairness in the judicial system. Mandatory sentences are also supposed to serve as a general deterrence for potential criminals and repeat offenders, who are expected to avoid crime because they can be certain of their sentence if they are caught. This is the reasoning behind the "tough on crime" policy. United States federal juries are generally not allowed to be informed of the mandatory minimum penalties that may apply if the accused is convicted because the jury's role is limited to a determination of guilt or innocence. However, defense attorneys sometimes have found ways to impart this information to juries; for instance, it is occasionally possible, on cross-examination of an informant who faced similar charges, to ask how much time he was facing. It is sometimes deemed permissible because it is a means of impeaching the witness. However, in at least one state court case in Idaho, it was deemed impermissible. Notably, capital punishment has been mandatory for murder in a certain number of jurisdictions, including the United Kingdom until 1957 and Canada until 1961. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Tax evasion is an illegal attempt to defeat the imposition of taxes by individuals, corporations, trusts, and others. Tax evasion often entails the deliberate misrepresentation of the taxpayer's affairs to the tax authorities to reduce the taxpayer's tax liability, and it includes dishonest tax reporting, declaring less income, profits or gains than the amounts actually earned, overstating deductions, using bribes against authorities in countries with high corruption rates and hiding money in secret locations. Tax evasion is an activity commonly associated with the informal economy. One measure of the extent of tax evasion (the "tax gap") is the amount of unreported income, which is the difference between the amount of income that should be reported to the tax authorities and the actual amount reported. In contrast, tax avoidance is the legal use of tax laws to reduce one's tax burden. Both tax evasion and tax avoidance can be viewed as forms of tax noncompliance, as they describe a range of activities that intend to subvert a state's tax system, but such classification of tax avoidance is disputable since avoidance is lawful in self-creating systems. Both tax evasion and tax avoidance can be practiced by corporations, trusts, or individuals. Economics. In 1968, Nobel laureate economist Gary Becker first theorized the economics of crime, on the basis of which authors M G Allingham and A Sandmo produced, in 1972, an economic model of tax evasion. This model deals with the evasion of income tax, the main source of tax revenue in developed countries. According to the authors, the level of evasion of income tax depends on the detection probability and the level of punishment provided by law. Later studies, however, pointed to limitations of the model, highlighting that individuals are also more likely to comply with taxes when they believe that tax money is appropriately used and when they can take part in public decisions. The literature's theoretical models are elegant in their effort to identify the variables likely to affect non-compliance. Alternative specifications, however, yield conflicting results concerning both the signs and magnitudes of variables believed to affect tax evasion. Empirical work is required to resolve the theoretical ambiguities. Income tax evasion appears to be positively influenced by the tax rate, the unemployment rate, the level of income and dissatisfaction with government. The U.S. Tax Reform Act of 1986 appears to have reduced tax evasion in the United States. In a 2017 study Alstadsæter et al concluded based on random stratified audits and leaked data that occurrence of tax evasion rises sharply as amount of wealth rises and that the very richest are about 10 times more likely than average people to engage in tax evasion. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

In United States law, a motion is a procedural device to bring a limited, contested issue before a court for decision. It is a request to the judge (or judges) to make a decision about the case. Motions may be made at any point in administrative, criminal or civil proceedings, although that right is regulated by court rules which vary from place to place. The party requesting the motion may be called the moving party, or may simply be the movant. The party opposing the motion is the nonmoving party or nonmovant. Process. In the United States, as a general rule, courts do not have self-executing powers. In other words, in order for the court to rule on a contested issue in a case before it, one of the parties or a third party must raise an appropriate motion asking for a particular order. Some motions may be made in the form of an oral request in open court, which is then either summarily granted or denied orally by the court. This is still common with motions made during trial. Today, however, most motions (especially on important or dispositive issues that could decide the entire case) are decided after oral argument preceded by the filing and service of legal papers. That is, the movant is usually required to serve advance written notice along with a written legal argument and a supporting factual foundation to explain why the movant is entitled to the relief requested. The legal argument usually comes in the form of a memorandum of points and authorities, while the evidence of the facts supporting the legal argument is normally supplied in the form of affidavits or declarations under penalty of perjury (which may in turn authenticate attached documentary exhibits). --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

The right of self-defense (also called, when it applies to the defense of another, alter ego defense, defense of others, defense of a third person) is the right for people to use reasonable or defensive force, for the purpose of defending one's own life (self-defense) or the lives of others, including – in certain circumstances – the use of deadly force. If a defendant uses defensive force because of a threat of deadly or grievous harm by the other person, or a reasonable perception of such harm, the defendant is said to have a "perfect self-defense" justification. If the defendant uses defensive force because of such a perception, and the perception is not reasonable, the defendant may have an "imperfect self-defense" as an excuse. General concepts – legal theory. Justification does not make a criminal use of force lawful; if the use of force is justified, it cannot be criminal at all. The early theories make no distinction between defense of the person and defense of property. Whether consciously or not, this builds on the Roman Law principle of dominium where any attack on the members of the family or the property it owned was a personal attack on the pater familias – the male head of the household, sole owner of all property belonging to the household, and endowed by law with dominion over all his descendants through the male line no matter their age. The right to self-defense is phrased as the principle of vim vi repellere licet ("it is permitted to repel force by force") in the Digest of Justitian (6th century). Another early application of this was Martin Luther's concept of justified resistance against a Beerwolf ruler, which was used in the doctrine of the lesser magistrate propounded in the 1550 Magdeburg Confession. In Leviathan (1651), Hobbes (using the English term self-defense for the first time) proposed the foundation political theory that distinguishes between a state of nature where there is no authority and a modern state. Hobbes argues that although some may be stronger or more intelligent than others in their natural state, none are so strong as to be beyond a fear of violent death, which justifies self-defense as the highest necessity. In the Two Treatises of Government, John Locke asserts the reason why an owner would give up their autonomy: ...the enjoyment of the property he has in this state is very unsafe, very unsecure. This makes him willing to quit a condition, which, however free, is full of fears and continual dangers: and it is not without reason, that he seeks out, and is willing to join in society with others, who are already united, or have a mind to unite, for the mutual preservation of their lives, liberties and estates, which many call by the general name, property. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

A copyright is a type of intellectual property that gives its owner the exclusive right to copy, distribute, adapt, display, and perform a creative work, usually for a limited time. The creative work may be in a literary, artistic, educational, or musical form. Copyright is intended to protect the original expression of an idea in the form of a creative work, but not the idea itself. A copyright is subject to limitations based on public interest considerations, such as the fair use doctrine in the United States. Some jurisdictions require "fixing" copyrighted works in a tangible form. It is often shared among multiple authors, each of whom holds a set of rights to use or license the work, and who are commonly referred to as rights holders. These rights frequently include reproduction, control over derivative works, distribution, public performance, and moral rights such as attribution. Copyrights can be granted by public law and are in that case considered "territorial rights". This means that copyrights granted by the law of a certain state, do not extend beyond the territory of that specific jurisdiction. Copyrights of this type vary by country; many countries, and sometimes a large group of countries, have made agreements with other countries on procedures applicable when works "cross" national borders or national rights are inconsistent. Typically, the public law duration of a copyright expires 50 to 100 years after the creator dies, depending on the jurisdiction. Some countries require certain copyright formalities to establish a copyright, others recognize copyright in any completed work, without a formal registration. When the copyright of a work expires, it enters the public domain. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

In law, a sentence is the punishment for a crime ordered by a trial court after conviction in a criminal procedure, normally at the conclusion of a trial. A sentence may consist of imprisonment, a fine, or other sanctions. Sentences for multiple crimes may be a concurrent sentence, where sentences of imprisonment are all served together at the same time, or a consecutive sentence, in which the period of imprisonment is the sum of all sentences served one after the other. Additional sentences include intermediate, which allows an inmate to be free for about 8 hours a day for work purposes; determinate, which is fixed on a number of days, months, or years; and indeterminate or bifurcated, which mandates the minimum period be served in an institutional setting such as a prison followed by street time period of parole, supervised release or probation until the total sentence is completed. If a sentence is reduced to a less harsh punishment, then the sentence is said to have been mitigated or commuted. Rarely depending on circumstances, murder charges are mitigated and reduced to manslaughter charges. However, in certain legal systems, a defendant may be punished beyond the terms of the sentence, through phenomena including social stigma, loss of governmental benefits, or collectively, the collateral consequences of criminal charges. Statutes generally specify the highest penalties that may be imposed for certain offenses, and sentencing guidelines often mandate the minimum and maximum imprisonment terms imposed upon an offender, which is then left to the discretion of the trial court. However, in some jurisdictions, prosecutors have great influence over the punishments actually handed down, by virtue of their discretion to decide what offenses to charge the offender with and what facts they will seek to prove or to ask the defendant to stipulate to in a plea agreement. It has been argued that legislators have an incentive to enact tougher sentences than even they would like to see applied to the typical defendant since they recognize that the blame for an inadequate sentencing range to handle a particularly egregious crime would fall upon legislators, but the blame for excessive punishments would fall upon prosecutors. Sentencing law sometimes includes cliffs that result in much stiffer penalties when certain facts apply. For instance, an armed career criminal or habitual offender law may subject a defendant to a significant increase in his sentence if he commits a third offense of a certain kind. This makes it difficult for fine gradations in punishments to be achieved. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Smuggling is the illegal transportation of objects, substances, information or people, such as out of a house or buildings, into a prison, or across an international border, in violation of applicable laws or other regulations. There are various motivations to smuggle. These include the participation in illegal trade, such as in the drug trade, illegal weapons trade, prostitution, human trafficking, kidnapping, exotic wildlife trade, art theft, heists, chop shops, illegal immigration or illegal emigration, tax evasion, import or export restrictions, providing contraband to prison inmates, or the theft of the items being smuggled. Smuggling is a common theme in literature, from Bizet's opera Carmen to the James Bond spy books (and later films) Diamonds Are Forever and Goldfinger. Types of smuggling. Goods. Much smuggling occurs when enterprising merchants attempt to supply demand for a good or service that is illegal or heavily taxed. As a result, illegal drug trafficking, and the smuggling of weapons (illegal arms trade), as well as the historical staples of smuggling, alcohol (rum-running) and tobacco, are widespread. As the smuggler faces significant risk of civil and criminal penalties if caught with contraband, smugglers are able to impose a significant price premium on smuggled goods. The profits involved in smuggling goods appear to be extensive. The iron law of prohibition dictates that greater enforcement results in more potent alcohol and drugs being smuggled. Profits also derive from avoiding taxes or levies on imported goods. For example, a smuggler might purchase a large quantity of cigarettes in a place with low taxes and smuggle them into a place with higher taxes, where they can be sold at a far higher margin than would otherwise be possible. It has been reported that smuggling one truckload of cigarettes within the United States can lead to a profit of US$2 million. People smuggling. With regard to people smuggling, a distinction can be made between people smuggling as a service to those wanting to illegally migrate and the involuntary trafficking of people. An estimated 90% of people who illegally crossed the border between Mexico and the United States are believed to have paid a smuggler to lead them across. People smuggling can be used to rescue a person from oppressive circumstances. For example, when the Southern United States allowed slavery, many slaves moved north via the Underground Railroad. Similarly, during the Holocaust, Jewish people were smuggled out of Germany by people such as Algoth Niska. Human trafficking. Trafficking of human beings — sometimes called human trafficking or, in the case of sexual services, sex trafficking — is not the same as people smuggling. A smuggler will facilitate illegal entry into a country for a fee, and on arrival at their destination, the smuggled person is free; the trafficking victim is coerced in some way. Victims do not agree to be trafficked; they are tricked, lured by false promises, or forced into it. Traffickers use coercive tactics including deception, fraud, intimidation, isolation, physical threats and use of force, debt bondage or even force-feeding drugs to control their victims. While the majority of victims are women, and sometimes children, other victims include men, women and children forced or conned into manual or cheap labor. Due to the illegal nature of trafficking, the exact extent is unknown. A U.S. government report published in 2003 estimates that 800,000 to 900,000 people worldwide are trafficked across borders each year. This figure does not include those who are trafficked internally. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Interpleader is a civil procedure device that allows a plaintiff or a defendant to initiate a lawsuit in order to compel two or more other parties to litigate a dispute. An interpleader action originates when the plaintiff holds property on behalf of another, but does not know to whom the property should be transferred. It is often used to resolve disputes arising under insurance contracts. Terminology and overview. In an interpleader action, the party initiating the litigation, normally the plaintiff, is termed the stakeholder. The money or other property in controversy is called the res (a Latin word meaning object or thing). All defendants having a possible interest in the subject matter of the case are called claimants. In some jurisdictions, the plaintiff is referred to as the plaintiff-in-interpleader and each claimant a claimant-in-interpleader. An interpleader proceeding has two stages. The first stage determines if the stakeholder is entitled to an interpleader and if he should be discharged from liability. The second stage is like an action at law to determine which of the claimants is entitled to the res. Application. Suppose a person dies with a valid life insurance policy in effect. The insurance company is ready, willing, and able to pay the policy proceeds in specified percentages to named beneficiaries as last directed by the policyholder, but becomes aware of a dispute among them and or third parties as to who are the proper beneficiaries or the proper distribution of proceeds among the beneficiaries. Such a dispute commonly arises from interpersonal friction among the policyholder's survivors. One specific situation commonly seen in the reported cases is where the policyholder was allegedly murdered by a beneficiary (which would disqualify that beneficiary from receiving any proceeds). To resolve such a dispute, the insurance company can file an interpleader action. The insurance company is the stakeholder, the claimants are the persons who might be beneficiaries under the policy, and the cash value of the policy benefit is the res. Under the proceeding as originally developed, the stakeholder would deposit the res with the court, and then the defendants would have their claims adjudicated by the court. Statutory modifications to the procedure, which vary by jurisdiction, sometimes allow the stakeholder to retain the res pending final disposition of the case. Typically, once the stakeholder deposits the res into the court (for example, the face value of the insurance policy), the stakeholder is released from the action and the claimants proceed against each other to determine which of them is legally entitled to the res. A disinterested stakeholder is entitled to costs including attorney's fees. Except for the denominations of the parties, the action proceeds for the most part as other civil lawsuits in the same jurisdiction. In some jurisdictions, the res will earn interest at the legal rate until disbursed. The successful claimant is entitled to the interest as well as the principal. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

A statute of limitations, known in civil law systems as a prescriptive period, is a law passed by a legislative body to set the maximum time after an event within which legal proceedings may be initiated. In most jurisdictions, such periods exist for both criminal law and civil law such as contract law and property law, though often under different names and with varying details. When the time which is specified in a statute of limitations runs out, a claim might no longer be filed or, if it is filed, it may be subject to dismissal if the defense against that claim is raised that the claim is time-barred as having been filed after the statutory limitations period. When a statute of limitations expires in a criminal case, the courts no longer have jurisdiction. Most common crimes, misconducts and wrongdoings that have statutes of limitations are distinguished from particularly serious crimes because these claims may be brought at any time. In civil law systems, such provisions are typically part of their civil and criminal codes. The cause of action dictates the statute of limitations, which can be reduced or extended in order to ensure a full and fair trial. The intention of these laws is to facilitate resolution within a "reasonable" period of time. What amount of time is considered "reasonable" varies from country to country. In the United States, it may vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and state to state. Internationally, the statute of limitations may vary from one civil or criminal action to another. Some countries have no statute of limitations whatsoever. Analysis of a statute of limitations also requires the examination of any associated statute of repose, tolling provisions, and exclusions. Applications. Common law legal systems can include a statute specifying the length of time within which a claimant or prosecutor must file a case. In some civil jurisdictions (for example, California), a case cannot begin after the period specified, and courts have no jurisdiction over cases filed after the statute of limitations has expired. In some other jurisdictions (for example, New South Wales, Australia), a claim can be filed which may prove to have been brought outside the limitations period, but the court will retain jurisdiction in order to determine that issue, and the onus is on the defendant to plead it as part of their defense, or else the claim will not be statute barred. Once they are filed, cases do not need to be resolved within the period specified in the statute of limitations. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

"Author's rights" is a term frequently used in connection with laws about intellectual property. The term is considered as a direct translation of the French term droit d’auteur (also German Urheberrecht). It was first (1777) promoted in France by Pierre-Augustin Caron de Beaumarchais, who had close relations with Benjamin Franklin. It is generally used in relation to the copyright laws of civil law countries and in European Union law. Authors' rights are internationally protected by the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works and by other similar treaties. “Author” is used in a very wide sense, and includes composers, artists, sculptors and even architects: in general, the author is the person whose creativity led to the protected work being created, although the exact definition varies from country to country. Authors’ rights have two distinct components: the economic rights in the work and the moral rights of the author. The economic rights are a property right which is limited in time and which may be transferred by the author to other people in the same way as any other property (although many countries require that the transfer must be in the form of a written contract). They are intended to allow the author or their holder to profit financially from their creation, and include the right to authorize the reproduction of the work in any form (Article 9, Berne Convention). The authors of dramatic works (plays, etc.) also have the right to authorize the public performance of their works (Article 11, Berne Convention). The protection of the moral rights of an author is based on the view that a creative work is in some way an expression of the author's personality: the moral rights are therefore personal to the author, and cannot be transferred to another person except by testament when the author dies. The moral rights regime differs greatly between countries, but typically includes the right to be identified as the author of the work and the right to object to any distortion or mutilation of the work which would be prejudicial to their honor or reputation (Article 6bis, Berne Convention). In many countries, the moral rights of an author are perpetual. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

In law, a verdict is the formal finding of fact made by a jury on matters or questions submitted to the jury by a judge. In a bench trial, the judge's decision near the end of the trial is simply referred to as a finding. In England and Wales, a coroner's findings used to be called verdicts but are, since 2009, called conclusions. Etymology. The term "verdict", from the Latin veredictum, literally means "to say the truth" and is derived from Middle English verdit, from Anglo-Norman: a compound of ver ("true", from the Latin vērus) and dit ("speech", from the Latin dictum, the neuter past participle of dīcere, to say). Criminal law. In a criminal case, the verdict, which may be either "not guilty" or "guilty"—except in Scotland where the verdict of "not proven" is also available—is handed down by the jury. Different counts in the same case may have different verdicts. A verdict of guilty in a criminal case is generally followed by a judgment of conviction rendered by the judge, which in turn is followed by sentencing. In U.S. legal nomenclature, the verdict is the finding of the jury on the questions of fact submitted to it. Once the court (the judge) receives the verdict, the judge enters judgment on the verdict. The judgment of the court is the final order in the case. If the defendant is found guilty, they can choose to appeal the case to the local Court of Appeals. Compromise verdict. A compromise verdict is a "verdict which is reached only by the surrender of conscientious convictions upon one material issue by some jurors in return for a relinquishment by others of their like settled opinion upon another issue and the result is one which does not command the approval of the whole panel", and, as such, is not permitted. Directed verdict. In a jury trial, a directed verdict is an order from the presiding judge to the jury to return a particular verdict. Typically, the judge orders a directed verdict after finding that no reasonable jury could reach a decision to the contrary. After a directed verdict, there is no longer any need for the jury to decide the case. A judge may order a directed verdict as to an entire case or only to certain issues. In a criminal case in the United States, once the prosecution has closed its case, the defendant may move for a directed verdict. If granted, the verdict will be "not guilty". The prosecution may never seek a directed verdict of guilty, as the defendant has a constitutional right to present a defense and rebut the prosecution's case and have a jury determine guilt or innocence (where a defendant has waived his/her right to a jury trial and allowed the judge to render the verdict, this still applies). In the American legal system, the concept of directed verdict has largely been replaced by judgment as a matter of law. General verdict. A general verdict is one in which the jury makes a complete finding and single conclusion on all issues presented to it. First, the jury finds the facts, as proved by the evidence, then it applies the law as instructed by the court, and finally it returns a verdict in one conclusion that settles the case. Such verdict is reported as follows: "We the Jury find the issues for the plaintiff (or defendant, as the case may be), and assess his damages at one hundred thousand dollars." Sealed verdict. A sealed verdict is a verdict put into a sealed envelope when there is a delay in announcing the result, such as waiting for the judge, the parties and the attorneys to come back to court. The verdict is kept in the sealed envelope until court reconvenes and then handed to the judge. This practice is virtually the default in many U.S. jurisdictions or may be the preference of the judge involved. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Robbery is the crime of taking or attempting to take anything of value by force, threat of force, or by use of fear. According to common law, robbery is defined as taking the property of another, with the intent to permanently deprive the person of that property, by means of force or fear; that is, it is a larceny or theft accomplished by an assault. Precise definitions of the offense may vary between jurisdictions. Robbery is differentiated from other forms of theft (such as burglary, shoplifting, pickpocketing, or car theft) by its inherently violent nature (a violent crime); whereas many lesser forms of theft are punished as misdemeanors, robbery is always a felony in jurisdictions that distinguish between the two. Under English law, most forms of theft are triable either way, whereas robbery is triable only on indictment. The word "rob" came via French from Late Latin words (for example, deraubare) of Germanic origin, from Common Germanic raub "theft". Among the types of robbery are armed robbery, which involves the use of a weapon, and aggravated robbery, when someone brings with them a deadly weapon or something that appears to be a deadly weapon. Highway robbery or mugging takes place outside or in a public place such as a sidewalk, street, or parking lot. Carjacking is the act of stealing a car from a victim by force. Extortion is the threat to do something illegal, or the offer to not do something illegal, in the event that goods are not given, primarily using words instead of actions. Criminal slang for robbery includes "blagging" (armed robbery, usually of a bank) or "stick-up" (derived from the verbal command to robbery targets to raise their hands in the air), and "steaming" (organized robbery on underground train systems). Canada. In Canada, the Criminal Code makes robbery an indictable offense, subject to a maximum penalty of life imprisonment. If the accused uses a restricted or prohibited firearm to commit robbery, there is a mandatory minimum sentence of five years for the first offense, and seven years for subsequent offenses. United Kingdom. England and Wales. Robbery is a statutory offense, is provided by section 36(3) Archived 2017-05-01 at the Wayback Machine of that Act. It is created by section 8(1) of the Theft Act 1968 which reads: A person is guilty of robbery if he steals, and immediately before or at the time of doing so, and in order to do so, he uses force on any person or puts or seeks to put any person in fear of being then and there subjected to force --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

In law, a joinder is the joining of two or more legal issues together. Procedurally, a joinder allows multiple issues to be heard in one hearing or trial and occurs if the issues or parties involved overlap sufficiently to make the process more efficient or fairer. That helps courts avoid hearing the same facts multiple times or seeing the same parties return to court separately for each of their legal disputes. The term is also used in the realm of contracts to describe the joining of new parties to an existing agreement. Criminal procedure. Joinder in criminal law refers to the inclusion of additional counts or additional defendants on an indictment. In English law, charges for any offense may be joined in the same indictment if those charges are founded on the same facts or form or are a part of a series of offenses of the same or a similar nature. A number of defendants may be joined in the same indictment even if no single count applies to all of them if the counts are sufficiently linked. The judge retains the option to order separate trials. Civil procedure. Joinder in civil law falls under two categories: joinder of claims and joinder of parties. Joinder of claims. Joinder of claims refers to bringing several legal claims against the same party together. In U.S. federal law, joinder of claims is governed by Rule 18 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. These rules allow claimants to consolidate all claims that they have against an individual who is already a party to the case. Claimants may bring new claims even if these new claims are not related to the claims already stated; for example, a plaintiff suing someone for breach of contract may also sue the same person for assault. The claims may be unrelated, but they may be joined if the plaintiff desires. Joinder of claims requires that the court have jurisdiction over the subject matter of each of the new claims, and that joinder of claims is never compulsory. A party who sues for breach of contract can bring his suit for assault at a later date if he chooses. However, if the claims are related to the same set of facts, the plaintiff may be barred from bringing claims later by the doctrine of res judicata, for example if a plaintiff sues for assault and the case is concluded, he may not later sue for battery regarding the same occurrence. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Assumption of risk is a defense, specifically an affirmative defense, in the law of torts, which bars or reduces a plaintiff's right to recovery against a negligent tortfeasor if the defendant can demonstrate that the plaintiff voluntarily and knowingly assumed the risks at issue inherent to the dangerous activity in which the plaintiff was participating at the time of their injury. Primary versus secondary. "Primary" assumption of risk occurs when the plaintiff knows about a particular risk and—through words or conduct—accepts that risk, thereby relieving the defendant of its duty of care. The primary assumption of risk defense operates as a complete bar to recovery. For example, someone who goes skiing assumes the risk that they will fall and break a bone and cannot sue a ski resort for such an injury in the absence of additional fault, such as the failure to properly maintain safety equipment. "Secondary" assumption of risk exists where the defendant has a continuing duty of reasonable care to the plaintiff, but the plaintiff knows about the risk caused by the defendant's negligence and proceeds despite that knowledge. For example, an employer supplies an employee with a defective piece of machinery, and knowing the machinery is defective, the employee proceeds to use it anyway (albeit carefully). If the machinery causes injury, the employer may have a secondary assumption of risk defense. In comparative negligence jurisdictions, secondary assumption of risk is applied as a factor that the jury can consider in apportioning fault, rather than a complete defense. The California Supreme Court explained the difference between primary and secondary assumption of risk (under California law) as follows: In cases involving 'primary assumption of risk'—where, by virtue of the nature of the activity and the parties' relationship to the activity, the defendant owes no legal duty to protect the plaintiff from the particular risk of harm that caused the injury—the doctrine continues to operate as a complete bar to the plaintiff's recovery. In cases involving 'secondary assumption of risk'—where the defendant does owe a duty of care to the plaintiff, but the plaintiff proceeds to encounter a known risk imposed by the defendant's breach of duty—the doctrine is merged into the comparative fault scheme, and the trier of fact, in apportioning the loss resulting from the injury, may consider the relative responsibility of the parties. Some states have abrogated the primary assumption-of-risk defense in certain situations because they have determined that the defendant in that situation should not be absolved of its duty of care, even if the plaintiff assumed the risk (such as by signing a premises liability waiver). States have, for example, passed laws abrogating primary assumption of risk for employers engaged in dangerous activities and for landlords with regard to safety conditions on their properties. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Objections to overly broad intellectual property laws. Some critics of intellectual property, such as those in the free culture movement, point at intellectual monopolies as harming health (in the case of pharmaceutical patents), preventing progress, and benefiting concentrated interests to the detriment of the masses, and argue that the public interest is harmed by ever-expansive monopolies in the form of copyright extensions, software patents, and business method patents. More recently scientists and engineers are expressing concern that patent thickets are undermining technological development even in high-tech fields like nanotechnology. Petra Moser has asserted that historical analysis suggests that intellectual property laws may harm innovation: Overall, the weight of the existing historical evidence suggests that patent policies, which grant strong intellectual property rights to early generations of inventors, may discourage innovation. On the contrary, policies that encourage the diffusion of ideas and modify patent laws to facilitate entry and encourage competition may be an effective mechanism to encourage innovation. In support of that argument, Jörg Baten, Nicola Bianchi and Petra Moser find historical evidence that especially compulsory licensing – which allows governments to license patents without the consent of patent-owners – encouraged invention in Germany in the early 20th century by increasing the threat of competition in fields with low pre-existing levels of competition. Peter Drahos notes, "Property rights confer authority over resources. When authority is granted to the few over resources on which the many depend, the few gain power over the goals of the many. This has consequences for both political and economic freedom within a society." The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) recognizes that conflicts may exist between the respect for and implementation of current intellectual property systems and other human rights. In 2001 the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights issued a document called "Human rights and intellectual property" that argued that intellectual property tends to be governed by economic goals when it should be viewed primarily as a social product; in order to serve human well-being, intellectual property systems must respect and conform to human rights laws. According to the Committee, when systems fail to do so, they risk infringing upon the human right to food and health, and to cultural participation and scientific benefits. In 2004 the General Assembly of WIPO adopted The Geneva Declaration on the Future of the World Intellectual Property Organization which argues that WIPO should "focus more on the needs of developing countries, and to view IP as one of many tools for development—not as an end in itself". Ethical problems are most pertinent when socially valuable goods like life-saving medicines are given IP protection. While the application of IP rights can allow companies to charge higher than the marginal cost of production in order to recoup the costs of research and development, the price may exclude from the market anyone who cannot afford the cost of the product, in this case a life-saving drug. "An IPR driven regime is therefore not a regime that is conducive to the investment of R&D of products that are socially valuable to predominantly poor populations". --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Bail is a set of pre-trial restrictions that are imposed on a suspect to ensure that they will not hamper the judicial process. Bail is the conditional release of a defendant with the promise to appear in court when required. In some countries, especially the United States, bail usually implies a bail bond, a deposit of money or some form of property to the court by the suspect in return for the release from pre-trial detention. If the suspect does not return to court, the bail is forfeited and the suspect may possibly be brought up on charges of the crime of failure to appear. If the suspect returns to make all their required appearances, bail is returned after the trial is concluded. In other countries, such as the United Kingdom, bail is more likely to consist of a set of restrictions that the suspect will have to abide by for a set period of time. Under this usage, bail can be given both before and after charge. For minor crimes, a defendant may be summoned to court without the need for bail. For serious crimes, or for suspects who are deemed likely to fail to turn up in court, they may be remanded (detained) while awaiting trial. A suspect is given bail in cases where remand is not justified but there is a need to provide an incentive for the suspect to appear in court. Bail amounts may vary depending on the type and severity of crime the suspect is accused of; practices for determining bail amounts vary. Bail bond. In the United States, it is common for bail to be a cash (or other property) deposit. Cash bail in other countries is more limited. Known as a bail bond or cash bail, an amount of money is posted so that the suspect can be released from pre-trial detention. If the suspect makes all of their required court appearances, this deposit is refunded. In 46 US states, a commercial bail bondsman can be paid to deposit bail money on behalf of a detained individual. This practice is illegal in the rest of the world. Illinois, Kentucky, Oregon and Wisconsin have outlawed commercial bail bonds, while New Jersey and Alaska rarely permit money bail. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Possession of stolen goods is a crime in which an individual has bought, been given, or acquired stolen goods. In many jurisdictions, if an individual has accepted possession of goods (or property) and knew they were stolen, then the individual may be charged with a misdemeanor or felony, depending on the value of the stolen goods, and the goods are returned to the original owner. If the individual did not know the goods were stolen, then the goods are returned to the owner and the individual is not prosecuted. However, it can be difficult to prove or disprove a suspect's knowledge that the goods were stolen. Nature of offense by country. United States. In the United States, receipt of stolen property is a federal crime under 18 U.S.C. § 2315, and is defined as knowingly receiving, concealing, or disposing of stolen property with a value of at least $5,000 such that it also constitutes interstate commerce (for example, has been transported across state lines). A person can be found guilty of that offense only if all of the following facts are proven: The person received or concealed or stored or disposed of items of stolen property. The items were moving as, or constituted a part of, interstate commerce. The items had a value in excess of $5,000. The person acted knowingly and willfully. The government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the person either received, concealed, stored, sold, or disposed of the stolen property. To be guilty of the offense, a person must know that the property had been stolen, but he need not know that it was moving as, or constituted a part of, interstate commerce. The term "interstate commerce" merely refers to the movement of property from one U.S. state into another; and it is sufficient if the property has recently moved interstate as a result of a transaction or a series of related transactions that have not been fully completed or consummated at the time of the person's acts as alleged. All U.S. states also have laws regarding receipt of stolen property. There is no minimum dollar amount in many jurisdictions, and in the case of state laws the requirement from Federal law regarding interstate commerce does not apply. In many states (Ohio, for example), the burden to prove criminal intent is not as stringent or is nonexistent. This means that one can be charged with the crime—usually a minor degree of felony—even if one did not know the item in question was stolen. In the Ohio case of State v Awad, the goods did not need to actually be stolen, just represented as such. Receiving stolen property and possession of stolen property are treated as separate offenses in some jurisdictions. What distinguishes the offenses is when the person became aware that the property was stolen. If the person knew that the property was stolen at the time he received it, the crime is receiving stolen property. If the person did not know the property was stolen at the time, she received it but found out after receiving possession, the crime is possession of stolen property. The state must prove that the defendant received or possessed the property for a dishonest purpose. If, for example, the person acquired possession for the purpose of returning the property to its lawful owner, no crime has been committed. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

In law, an answer was originally a solemn assertion in opposition to someone or something, and thus generally any counter-statement or defense, a reply to a question or response, or objection, or a correct solution of a problem. In the common law, an answer is the first pleading by a defendant, usually filed and served upon the plaintiff within a certain strict time limit after a civil complaint or criminal information or indictment has been served upon the defendant. It may have been preceded by an optional "pre-answer" motion to dismiss or demurrer; if such a motion is unsuccessful, the defendant must file an answer to the complaint or risk an adverse default judgment. In a criminal case, there is usually an arraignment or some other kind of appearance before the defendant comes to court. The pleading in the criminal case, which is entered on the record in open court, is usually either guilty or not guilty. Generally speaking in private, civil cases there is no plea entered of guilt or innocence. There is only a judgment that grants money damages or some other kind of equitable remedy such as restitution or a permanent injunction. Criminal cases may lead to fines or other punishment, such as imprisonment. The famous Latin Responsa Prudentium ("answers of the learned ones") were the accumulated views of many successive generations of Roman lawyers, a body of legal opinion which gradually became authoritative. During debates of a contentious nature, deflection, colloquially known as 'changing the topic', has been widely observed, and is often seen as a failure to answer a question. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Consent occurs when one person voluntarily agrees to the proposal or desires of another. It is a term of common speech, with specific definitions as used in such fields as the law, medicine, research, and sexual relationships. Consent as understood in specific contexts may differ from its everyday meaning. For example, a person with a mental disorder, a low mental age, or under the legal age of sexual consent may willingly engage in a sexual act that still fails to meet the legal threshold for consent as defined by applicable law. United Nations agencies and initiatives in sex education programs believe that teaching the topic of consent as part of a comprehensive sexuality education is beneficial. Types of consent include implied consent, express consent, informed consent and unanimous consent. Types. An expression of consent is one that is unmistakably stated, rather than implied. It may be given in writing, by speech (orally), or non-verbally, for example by a clear gesture such as a nod. Non-written express consent not evidenced by witnesses or an audio or video recording may be disputed if a party denies that it was given. Implied consent is consent inferred from a person's actions and the facts and circumstances of a particular situation (or in some cases, by a person's silence or inaction). Examples include unambiguously soliciting or initiating sexual activity or the implied consent to physical contact by participants in a hockey game or being assaulted in a boxing match. Informed consent in medicine is consent given by a person who has a clear appreciation and understanding of the facts, implications, and future consequences of an action. The term is also used in other contexts, such as in social scientific research, when participants are asked to affirm that they understand the research procedure and consent to it, or in sex, where informed consent means each person engaging in sexual activity is aware of any positive statuses (for sexually transmitted infections and or diseases) they might expose themselves to. Unanimous consent, or general consent, by a group of several parties (for example, an association) is consent given by all parties. Substituted consent, or the substituted judgment doctrine, allows a decision maker to attempt to establish the decision an incompetent person would have made if they were competent. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Financial incentive. These exclusive rights allow owners of intellectual property to benefit from the property they have created, providing a financial incentive for the creation of an investment in intellectual property, and, in case of patents, pay associated research and development costs. In the United States Article 1 Section 8 Clause 8 of the Constitution, commonly called the Patent and Copyright Clause, reads; "The Congress shall have power 'To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries.'" ”Some commentators, such as David Levine and Michele Boldrin, dispute this justification. In 2013 the United States Patent & Trademark Office approximated that the worth of intellectual property to the U.S. economy is more than US $5 trillion and creates employment for an estimated 18 million American people. The value of intellectual property is considered similarly high in other developed nations, such as those in the European Union. In the UK, IP has become a recognised asset class for use in pension-led funding and other types of business finance. However, in 2013, the UK Intellectual Property Office stated: "There are millions of intangible business assets whose value is either not being leveraged at all, or only being leveraged inadvertently". Economic growth. The WIPO treaty and several related international agreements underline that the protection of intellectual property rights is essential to maintaining economic growth. The WIPO Intellectual Property Handbook gives two reasons for intellectual property laws: One is to give statutory expression to the moral and economic rights of creators in their creations and the rights of the public in access to those creations. The second is to promote, as a deliberate act of Government policy, creativity and the dissemination and application of its results and to encourage fair trading which would contribute to economic and social development. The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) states that "effective enforcement of intellectual property rights is critical to sustaining economic growth across all industries and globally". Economists estimate that two-thirds of the value of large businesses in the United States can be traced to intangible assets. "IP-intensive industries" are estimated to generate 72% more value added (price minus material cost) per employee than "non-IP-intensive industries". A joint research project of the WIPO and the United Nations University measuring the impact of IP systems on six Asian countries found "a positive correlation between the strengthening of the IP system and subsequent economic growth." --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

In jurisprudence, double jeopardy is a procedural defense (primarily in common law jurisdictions) that prevents an accused person from being tried again on the same (or similar) charges following an acquittal or conviction and in rare cases prosecutorial and or judge misconduct in the same jurisdiction. Double jeopardy is a common concept in criminal law. In civil law, a similar concept is that of res judicata. Variation in common law countries is the peremptory plea, which may take the specific forms of autrefois acquit ('previously acquitted') or autrefois convict ('previously convicted'). These doctrines appear to have originated in ancient Roman law, in the broader principle non bis in idem ('not twice against the same'). Availability as a legal defense. If a double-jeopardy issue is raised, evidence will be placed before the court, which will typically rule as a preliminary matter whether the plea is substantiated; if it is, the projected trial will be prevented from proceeding. In some countries certain exemptions are permitted. In Scotland a new trial can be initiated if, for example, the acquitted has made a credible admission of guilt. Part of English law for over 800 years, it was partially abolished in England, Wales and Northern Ireland by the Criminal Justice Act 2003 where, following demand for change, serious offenses may be re-tried following an acquittal if new and compelling evidence is found, and if the trial is found to be in the public's interest. In some countries, including Canada, Mexico, and the United States, the guarantee against being "twice put in jeopardy" is a constitutional right. In other countries, the protection is afforded by statute. In common law countries, a defendant may enter a peremptory plea of autrefois acquit ('previously acquitted') or autrefois convict ('previously convicted'), with the same effect. Double jeopardy is not a principle of international law. It does not apply between different countries, unless having been contractually agreed on between those countries as, for example, in the European Union (Art. 54 Schengen Convention), and in various extradition treaties between two countries. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Pickpocketing is a form of larceny that involves the stealing of money or other valuables from the person or a victim's pocket without them noticing the theft at the time. It may involve considerable dexterity and a knack for misdirection. A thief who works in this manner is known as a pickpocket. As an occupation. Pickpockets and other thieves, especially those working in teams, sometimes apply distraction, such as asking a question or bumping into the victim. These distractions sometimes require sleight of hand, speed, misdirection and other types of skills. Pickpockets may be found in any crowded place around the world. However, Barcelona and Rome were recently singled out as being particularly dangerous pickpocket havens. Thieves have been known to operate in high traffic areas such as mass transit stations, even boarding subway trains so they can use the distractions of crowds and sudden stop-and-go movements from the train to steal from others. As soon as the thieves have what they want, they simply get off at the next stop leaving the victim unable to figure out who robbed them and when. As entertainment. Pickpocketing skills are employed by some magicians as a form of entertainment, either by taking an item from a spectator or by returning it without them knowing they had lost it. Borra, arguably the most famous stage pickpocket of all time, became the highest-paid European performer in circuses during the 1950s. For 60 years he was billed as "the King of Pickpockets" and encouraged his son, Charly, to follow in his cunning trade, his offspring being billed as "the Prince of Pickpockets". Henri Kassagi, a French-Tunisian illusionist, acted as technical advisor on Robert Bresson's 1959 film Pickpocket and appeared as instructor and accomplice to the main character. British entertainer James Freedman created the pickpocket sequences for the 2005 film Oliver Twist directed by Roman Polanski. American illusionist David Avadon featured pickpocketing as his trademark act for more than 30 years and promoted himself as "a daring pickpocket with dashing finesse" and "the country's premier exhibition pickpocket, one of the few masters in the world of this underground art." According to Thomas Blacke, an American illusionist who holds several world records, it has become more difficult nowadays to pickpocket both in the streets and on the stage because the general population wears less, or lighter, clothing. In 2015 an artist hired a pickpocket to distribute sculptures at Frieze Art Fair in New York. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

A demurrer is a pleading in a lawsuit that objects to or challenges a pleading filed by an opposing party. The word demur means "to object"; a demurrer is the document that makes the objection. Lawyers informally define a demurrer as a defendant saying "So what?" to the pleading. Typically, the defendant in a case will demur to the complaint, but it is also possible for the plaintiff to demur to an answer. The demurrer challenges the legal sufficiency of a cause of action in a complaint or of an affirmative defense in an answer. If a cause of action in a complaint does not state a cognizable claim or if it does not state all the required elements, then the challenged cause of action or possibly the entire complaint can be thrown out (informally speaking) at the demurrer stage as not legally sufficient. A demurrer is typically filed near the beginning of a case in response to the plaintiff filing a complaint or the defendant answering the complaint. In common law, a demurrer was the pleading through which a defendant challenged the legal sufficiency of a complaint in criminal or civil cases. Today, however, the pleading has been discontinued in many jurisdictions, including the United Kingdom, the U.S. federal court system, and most U.S. states (though some states, including California, Pennsylvania, and Virginia, retain it). In criminal cases, a demurrer was considered a common law due process right, to be heard and decided before the defendant was required to plead "not guilty," or make any other pleading in response, without having to admit or deny any of the facts alleged. A demurrer generally assumes the truth of all material facts alleged in the complaint, and the defendant cannot present evidence to the contrary, even if those facts appear to be obvious fabrications by the plaintiff or are likely to be easily disproved during litigation. That is, the point of the demurrer is to test whether a cause of action or affirmative defense as pleaded is legally insufficient, even if all facts pleaded are assumed to be true. The sole exception to the no-evidence rule is that a court may take judicial notice of certain things. For example, the court can take judicial notice of commonly known facts not reasonably subject to challenge, such as the Gregorian calendar, or of public records, such as a published legislative report showing the intent of the legislature in enacting a particular statute. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Elements of delict The elements of a delict as follows: The elements of harm and conduct are fact-based inquiries, while causation is part-factual and part-normative, and wrongfulness and fault are entirely normative: that is, value-based, in that they articulate a wider societal policy perspective. Delict is "inherently a flexible set of principles that embody social policy." harm sustained by the plaintiff; conduct on the part of the defendant which is wrongful; a causal connection between the conduct and the plaintiff's harm; and fault or blameworthiness on the part of the defendant. Elements of delict The elements of a delict as follows: The elements of harm and conduct are fact-based inquiries, while causation is part-factual and part-normative, and wrongfulness and fault are entirely normative: that is, value-based, in that they articulate a wider societal policy perspective. Delict is "inherently a flexible set of principles that embody social policy." harm sustained by the plaintiff; conduct on the part of the defendant which is wrongful; a causal connection between the conduct and the plaintiff's harm; and fault or blameworthiness on the part of the defendant. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

In criminal law, self-incrimination is the act of exposing oneself generally, by making a statement, "to an accusation or charge of crime; to involve oneself or another  in a criminal prosecution or the danger thereof". (Self-incrimination can occur either directly or indirectly: directly, by means of interrogation where information of a self-incriminatory nature is disclosed; or indirectly, when information of a self-incriminatory nature is disclosed voluntarily without pressure from another person). In many legal systems, accused criminals cannot be compelled to incriminate themselves—they may choose to speak to police or other authorities, but they cannot be punished for refusing to do so. There are 108 countries and jurisdictions that currently issue legal warnings to suspects, which include the right to remain silent and the right to legal counsel. These laws are not uniform across the world; however, members of the European Union have developed their laws around the EU's guide. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Intellectual property (IP) is a category of property that includes intangible creations of the human intellect. There are many types of intellectual property, and some countries recognize more than others. The best-known types are copyrights, patents, trademarks, and trade secrets. The modern concept of intellectual property developed in England in the 17th and 18th centuries. The term "intellectual property" began to be used in the 19th century, though it was not until the late 20th century that intellectual property became commonplace in the majority of the world's legal systems. The main purpose of intellectual property law is to encourage the creation of a wide variety of intellectual goods. To achieve this, the law gives people and businesses property rights to the information and intellectual goods they create, usually for a limited period of time. This gives economic incentive for their creation, because it allows people to benefit from the information and intellectual goods they create, and allows them to protect their ideas and prevent copying. These economic incentives are expected to stimulate innovation and contribute to the technological progress of countries, which depends on the extent of protection granted to innovators. The intangible nature of intellectual property presents difficulties when compared with traditional property like land or goods. Unlike traditional property, intellectual property is "indivisible", since an unlimited number of people can "consume" an intellectual good without its being depleted. Additionally, investments in intellectual goods suffer from problems of appropriation: Landowners can surround their land with a robust fence and hire armed guards to protect it, but producers of information or literature can usually do little to stop their first buyer from replicating it and selling it at a lower price. Balancing rights so that they are strong enough to encourage the creation of intellectual goods but not so strong that they prevent the goods' wide use is the primary focus of modern intellectual property law. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Payola, in the music industry, is the illegal practice of paying a commercial radio station to play a song without the station disclosing the payment. Under US law, a radio station must disclose songs they were paid to play on the air as sponsored airtime. The number of times the songs are played can influence the perceived popularity of a song, and payola may be used to influence these meters. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) treats payola as a violation of the Sponsorship Identification Rules, which requires any broadcast of paid material to include a disclosure. The term payola is a combination of "pay" and "ola", which is a suffix of product names common in the early 20th century, such as Pianola, Victrola, Amberola, Crayola, Rock-Ola, Shinola, or brands such as the radio equipment manufacturer Motorola. History. Prior to the 1930s, there was little public scrutiny of the reasoning behind a song's popularity. The advertising agencies which sponsored NBC's radio/TV show Your Hit Parade refused to reveal the specific methods that were used to determine top hits. Only general and vague statements were offered; that determining top hits was based on "readings of radio requests, sheet music sales, dance hall favorites and jukebox tabulations". Early attempts to stop payola were met with silence by publishers. Prosecution for payola in the 1950s was in part a reaction of the traditional music establishment against newcomers. The emergence of hit radio had become a threat to the wages of song-pluggers and publisher's revenue streams. By the mid-1940s, three-quarters of the records produced in the United States went into jukeboxes. Attempts were made to link all payola to rock-and-roll music. In the 1950s, independent record companies or music publishers frequently used payola to promote rock and roll on American radio. This practice promoted cultural diversity because disc jockeys (DJs) were less inclined to indulge their own personal and racial biases. While the amount of money involved remains largely unpublished, Phil Lind of Chicago's W A I T disclosed in Congressional hearings that he had taken US$22,000 to play a record. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Class action cases present significant ethical challenges. Defendants can hold reverse auctions and any of several parties can engage in collusive settlement discussions. Subclasses may have interests that diverge greatly from the class but may be treated the same. Proposed settlements could offer some groups (such as former customers) much greater benefits than others. In one paper presented at an ABA conference on class actions in 2007, authors commented that "competing cases can also provide opportunities for collusive settlement discussions and reverse auctions by defendants anxious to resolve their new exposure at the most economic cost". Defendant class action. Although normally plaintiffs are the class, defendant class actions are also possible. For example, in 2005, the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Portland in Oregon was sued as part of the Catholic priest sex-abuse scandal. All parishioners of the Archdiocese's churches were cited as a defendant class. This was done to include their assets (local churches) in any settlement. Where both the plaintiffs and the defendants have been organized into court-approved classes, the action is called a bilateral class action. Mass actions. In a class action, the plaintiff seeks court approval to litigate on behalf of a group of similarly situated persons. Not every plaintiff looks for or could obtain such approval. As a procedural alternative, plaintiff's counsel may attempt to sign up every similarly situated person that counsel can find as a client. Plaintiff's counsel can then join the claims of all of these persons in one complaint, a so-called "mass action", hoping to have the same efficiencies and economic leverage as if a class had been certified. Because mass actions operate outside the detailed procedures laid out for class actions, they can pose special difficulties for both plaintiffs, defendants, and the court. For example, settlement of class actions follows a predictable path of negotiation with class counsel and representatives, court scrutiny, and notice. There may not be a way to uniformly settle all of the many claims brought via a mass action. Some states permit plaintiff's counsel to settle for all the mass action plaintiffs according to a majority vote, for example. Other states, such as New Jersey, require each plaintiff to approve the settlement of that plaintiff's own individual claims. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Nuisance. "Nuisance" is traditionally used to describe an activity which is harmful or annoying to others such as indecent conduct or a rubbish heap. Nuisances either affect private individuals (private nuisance) or the general public (public nuisance). The claimant can sue for most acts that interfere with their use and enjoyment of their land. In English law, whether activity was an illegal nuisance depended upon the area and whether the activity was "for the benefit of the commonwealth", with richer areas subject to a greater expectation of cleanliness and quiet. The case Jones v Powell (1629) provides an early example, in which a person's professional papers were damaged by the vapors of a neighboring brewery. Although the outcome of this case is unclear, Whitelocke of the Court of the King's Bench is recorded as saying that since the water supply in area was already contaminated, the nuisance was not actionable as it is "better that they should be spoiled than that the commonwealth stand in need of good liquor". In English law, a related category of tort liability was created in the case of Rylands v Fletcher (1868): strict liability was established for a dangerous escape of some hazard, including water, fire, or animals as long as the cause was not remote. In Cambridge Water Company Limited v Eastern Counties Leather plc (1994), chemicals from a factory seeped through a floor into the water table, contaminating East Anglia's water reservoirs. The Rylands rule remains in use in England and Wales. In Australian law, it has been merged into negligence. Economic torts. Economic torts typically involve commercial transactions, and include tortious interference with trade or contract, fraud, injurious falsehood, and negligent misrepresentation. Negligent misrepresentation torts are distinct from contractual cases involving misrepresentation in that there is no privity of contract; these torts are likely to involve pure economic loss which has been less-commonly recoverable in tort. One criterion for determining whether economic loss is recoverable is the "foreseeability" doctrine. The economic loss rule is highly confusing and inconsistently applied and began in 1965 from a California case involving strict liability for product defects; in 1986, the U.S. Supreme Court adopted the doctrine in East River SS Corporation v Transamerica Deleval, Incorporation. In 2010, the supreme court of the U.S. state of Washington replaced the economic loss doctrine with an "independent duty doctrine". Economic antitrust torts have been somewhat submerged by modern competition law. However, in the United States, private parties are permitted in certain circumstances to sue for anticompetitive practices, including under federal or state statutes or on the basis of common law tortious interference, which may be based upon the Restatement (Second) of Torts §766. Negligent misrepresentation as tort where no contractual privity exists was disallowed in England by Derry v Peek ; however, this position was overturned in Hedley Byrne v Heller in 1964 so that such actions were allowed if a "special relationship" existed between the plaintiff and defendant. United States courts and scholars "paid lip-service" to Derry; however, scholars such as William Prosser argued that it was misinterpreted by English courts. The case of Ultramares Corporation v Touche (1932) limited the liability of an auditor to known identified beneficiaries of the audit and this rule was widely applied in the United States until the 1960s. The Restatement (Second) of Torts expanded liability to "foreseeable" users rather than specifically identified "foreseen" users of the information, dramatically expanding liability and affecting professionals such as accountants, architects, attorneys, and surveyors. As of 1989, most U.S. jurisdictions follow either the Ultramares approach or the Restatement approach. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Michael Milken. On 29 March 1989 American financier Michael Milken was indicted on 98 counts of racketeering and fraud relating to an investigation into an allegation of insider trading and other offenses. Milken was accused of using a wide-ranging network of contacts to manipulate stock and bond prices. It was one of the first occasions that a RICO indictment was brought against an individual with no ties to organized crime. Milken pleaded guilty to six lesser felonies of securities fraud and tax evasion, rather than risk spending the rest of his life in prison and ended up serving 22 months in prison. Milken was also ordered banned for life from the securities industry. On September 7, 1988, Milken's employer, Drexel Burnham Lambert, was threatened with RICO charges under respondeat superior, the legal doctrine that corporations are responsible for their employees' crimes. Drexel avoided RICO charges by entering an Alford plea to lesser felonies of stock parking and stock manipulation. In a carefully worded plea, Drexel said it was "not in a position to dispute the allegations" made by the Government. If Drexel had been indicted under RICO statutes, it would have had to post a performance bond of up to $1 billion to avoid having its assets frozen. That would have taken precedence over all of the firm's other obligations, including the loans that provided 96 percent of its capital base. If the bond ever had to be paid, its shareholders would have been practically wiped out. Since banks will not extend credit to a firm indicted under RICO, an indictment would have likely put Drexel out of business. By at least one estimate, a RICO indictment would have destroyed the firm within a month. Years later, Drexel President and CEO Fred Joseph said that Drexel had no choice but to plead guilty because "a financial institution cannot survive a RICO indictment." Major League Baseball. In 2001, Major League Baseball team owners voted to eliminate two teams, presumably the Minnesota Twins and Montreal Expos. In 2002, the former minority owners of the Expos filed charges under the RICO Act against MLB commissioner Bud Selig and former Expos owner Jeffrey Loria, claiming that Selig and Loria deliberately conspired to devalue the team for personal benefit in preparation for a move. If found liable, Major League Baseball could have been responsible for up to $300 million in punitive damages. The case lasted two years, successfully stalling the Expos' move to Washington or contraction during that time. It was eventually sent to arbitration, where the arbiters ruled in favor of Major League Baseball, permitting the move to Washington to take place. Los Angeles Police Department. In April 2000, federal judge William J Rea in Los Angeles, ruling in one Rampart scandal case, said that the plaintiffs could pursue RICO claims against the LAPD, an unprecedented finding. In July 2001, US District Judge Gary A. Feess said that the plaintiffs did not have standing to sue the LAPD under RICO, because they were alleging personal injuries rather than economic or property damage. Mohawk Industries. On April 26, 2006, the Supreme Court heard Mohawk Industries, Inc. v Williams, (2006), which concerned what sort of corporations fell under the scope of RICO. Mohawk Industries had allegedly hired illegal aliens, in violation of RICO. The court was asked to decide whether Mohawk Industries, along with recruiting agencies, constituted an "enterprise" that could be prosecuted under RICO. However, in June of that year, the court dismissed the case and remanded it to the US Court of Appeals. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

In the United States, the exclusionary rule is a legal rule, based on constitutional law, that prevents evidence collected or analyzed in violation of the defendant's constitutional rights from being used in a court of law. This may be considered an example of a prophylactic rule formulated by the judiciary in order to protect a constitutional right. The exclusionary rule may also, in some circumstances at least, be considered to follow directly from the constitutional language, such as the Fifth Amendment's command that no person "shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself" and that no person "shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law." The exclusionary rule is grounded in the Fourth Amendment in the Bill of Rights, and it is intended to protect citizens from illegal searches and seizures. The exclusionary rule is also designed to provide a remedy and disincentive for criminal prosecution from prosecutors and police who illegally gathered evidence in violation of the Fifth Amendment and its protection against self-incrimination. The exclusionary rule also protects against violations of the Sixth Amendment, which guarantees the right to counsel. Most states also have their own exclusionary remedies for illegally obtained evidence under their state constitutions and/or statutes, some of which predate the federal constitutional guarantees against unlawful searches and seizures and compelled self-incrimination. This rule is occasionally referred to as a legal technicality because it allows defendants a defense that does not address whether the crime was actually committed. In this respect, it is similar to the explicit rule in the Fifth Amendment protecting people from double jeopardy. In strict cases, when an illegal action is used by police/prosecution to gain any incriminating result, all evidence whose recovery stemmed from the illegal action—this evidence is known as "fruit of the poisonous tree"—can be thrown out from a jury (or be grounds for a mistrial if too much information has been irrevocably revealed). The exclusionary rule applies to all persons within the United States regardless of whether they are citizens, immigrants (legal or illegal), or visitors. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

A class action, also known as a class-action lawsuit, class suit, or representative action, is a type of lawsuit where one of the parties is a group of people who are represented collectively by a member or members of that group. The class action originated in the United States and is still predominantly a US phenomenon, but Canada, as well as several European countries with civil law, have made changes in recent years to allow consumer organizations to bring claims on behalf of consumers. Description. In a typical class action, a plaintiff sues a defendant or a number of defendants on behalf of a group, or class, of absent parties. This differs from a traditional lawsuit, where one party sues another party, and all of the parties are present in court. Although standards differ between states and countries, class actions are most common where the allegations usually involve at least 40 people who the same defendant has injured in the same way. Instead of each damaged person bringing one's own lawsuit, the class action allows all the claims of all class members—whether they know they have been damaged or not—to be resolved in a single proceeding through the efforts of the representative plaintiffs and appointed class counsel. History. United States. Class actions survived in the United States thanks to the influence of Supreme Court Associate Justice Joseph Story, who imported it into US law through summary discussions in his two equity treatises as well as his opinion in West v Randall (1820).  However, Story did not necessarily endorse class actions, because he "could not conceive of a modern function or a coherent theory for representative litigation."  The oldest predecessor to the class-action rule in the United States was in the Federal Equity Rules, specifically Equity Rule 48, promulgated in 1842. Where the parties on either side are very numerous, and cannot, without manifest inconvenience and oppressive delays in the suit, be all brought before it, the court in its discretion may dispense with making all of them parties, and may proceed in the suit, having sufficient parties before it to represent all the adverse interests of the plaintiffs and the defendants in the suit properly before it. But in such cases, the decree shall be without prejudice to the rights and claims of all the absent parties. This allowed for representative suits in situations where there were too many individual parties (which now forms the first requirement for class-action litigation – numerosity). However, this rule did not allow such suits to bind similarly situated absent parties, which rendered the rule ineffective. Within ten years, the Supreme Court interpreted Rule 48 in such a way so that it could apply to absent parties under certain circumstances, but only by ignoring the plain meaning of the rule.  In the rules published in 1912, Equity Rule 48 was replaced with Equity Rule 38 as part of a major restructuring of the Equity Rules, and when federal courts merged their legal and equitable procedural systems in 1938, Equity Rule 38 became Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

A tort is a civil wrong that causes a claimant to suffer loss or harm, resulting in legal liability for the person who commits a tortious act. Tort law can be contrasted with criminal law, which deals with criminal wrongs that are punishable by the state. While criminal law aims to punish individuals who commit crimes, tort law aims to compensate individuals who suffer harm as a result of the actions of others. Some wrongful acts, such as assault and battery, can result in both a civil lawsuit and a criminal prosecution in countries where the civil and criminal legal systems are separate. Tort law may also be contrasted with contract law, which provides civil remedies after breach of a duty that arises from a contract. Obligations in both tort and criminal law are more fundamental and are imposed regardless of whether the parties have a contract. While tort law in civil law jurisdictions largely derives from Roman law, common law jurisdictions derive their tort law from customary English tort law. In civil law jurisdictions based on civil codes, both contractual and tortious or delictual liability is typically outlined in a civil code based on Roman Law principles. Tort law is referred to as the law of delict in Scots and Roman Dutch law, and resembles tort law in common law jurisdictions in that rules regarding civil liability are established primarily by precedent and theory rather than an exhaustive code. However, like other civil law jurisdictions, the underlying principles are drawn from Roman law. A handful of jurisdictions have codified a mixture of common and civil law jurisprudence either due to their colonial past (for example Québec, St Lucia, Mauritius) or due to influence from multiple legal traditions when their civil codes were drafted (for example Mainland China, the Philippines, and Thailand). Furthermore, Israel essentially codifies common law provisions on tort. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act is a United States federal law that provides for extended criminal penalties and a civil cause of action for acts performed as part of an ongoing criminal organization. RICO was enacted by section 901(a) of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970 (enacted October 15, 1970) and is codified at 18 U.S.C. chapter 96 as 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961–1968. G Robert Blakey, an adviser to the United States Senate Government Operations Committee, drafted the law under the close supervision of the committee's chairman, Senator John Little McClellan. It was enacted as Title 9 of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970, and signed into law by US President Richard M Nixon. While its original use in the 1970s was to prosecute the Mafia as well as others who were actively engaged in organized crime, its later application has been more widespread. Beginning in 1972, thirty-three states adopted state RICO laws to be able to prosecute similar conduct. Summary. Under RICO, a person who has committed "at least two acts of racketeering activity" drawn from a list of 35 crimes (27 federal crimes and eight state crimes) within a 10-year period can be charged with racketeering if such acts are related in one of four specific ways to an "enterprise." Those found guilty of racketeering can be fined up to $25,000 and sentenced to 20 years in prison per racketeering count. In addition, the racketeer must forfeit all ill-gotten gains and interest in any business gained through a pattern of "racketeering activity." A US Attorney who decides to indict someone under RICO has the option of seeking a pre-trial restraining order or injunction to temporarily seize a defendant's assets and prevent the transfer of potentially forfeitable property and to require the defendant to put up a performance bond. That provision was placed in the law because the owners of Mafia-related shell corporations often absconded with the assets. An injunction or performance bond ensures that there is something to seize in the event of a guilty verdict. In many cases, the threat of a RICO indictment can force defendants to plead guilty to lesser charges, in part because the seizure of assets would make it difficult to pay a defense attorney. Despite its harsh provisions, a RICO-related charge is considered easy to prove in court since it focuses on patterns of behavior, as opposed to criminal acts. RICO also permits a private individual "damaged in his business or property" by a "racketeer" to file a civil suit. The plaintiff must prove the existence of an "enterprise." The defendants are not the enterprise; in other words, the defendants and the enterprise are not one and the same. There must be one of four specified relationships between the defendants and the enterprise: either the defendants invested the proceeds of the pattern of racketeering activity into the enterprise (18 U.S.C. § 1962(a)); or the defendants acquired or maintained an interest in, or control of, the enterprise through the pattern of racketeering activity (subsection (b)); or the defendants conducted or participated in the affairs of the enterprise "through" the pattern of racketeering activity (subsection (c)); or the defendants conspired to do one of the above (subsection (d)). In essence, the enterprise is either the 'prize', 'instrument', 'victim', or 'perpetrator' of the racketeers. A civil RICO action can be filed in state or federal court. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

United States. The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides: In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right…to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense. The assistance of counsel clause includes, as relevant here, five distinct rights: the right to counsel of choice, the right to appointed counsel, the right to conflict-free counsel, the effective assistance of counsel, and the right to represent oneself pro se. A defendant does not have a Sixth Amendment right to counsel in any civil proceeding, including a deportation hearing (even though deportability is often a collateral consequence of criminal conviction). However, as described below, there are certain civil proceedings where parties have a right to appointed counsel; such a right is pursuant to the Fourteenth Amendment's due process or equal protection clause, a state constitution's due process or equal protection clause, or a federal/state statute. Subject to considerations such as conflicts of interest, scheduling, counsel's authorization to practice law in the jurisdiction, and counsel's willingness to represent the defendant (whether pro bono or for a fee), criminal defendants have a right to be represented by counsel of their choice. The remedy for erroneous deprivation of first choice counsel is automatic reversal. Appointment of counsel for indigent litigants. A criminal defendant unable to afford counsel has the right to appointed counsel at the government's expense. While the Supreme Court recognized this right gradually, it currently applies in all federal and state criminal proceedings where the defendant faces authorized imprisonment greater than one year (a "felony") or where the defendant is actually imprisoned, including imposition of a suspended incarceration sentence of any length. Criminal defendants in misdemeanor cases do not have a right to appointed counsel if they are not sentenced to actual imprisonment, even if that conviction is later used to enhance sentencing for another crime, or even if the revocation of probation may result in actual imprisonment (although for parole revocation, the court evaluates the right to counsel on a case-by-case-basis). Nor does the defendant have the right to appointed counsel to raise frivolous arguments on direct appeal, or to raise any arguments on habeas or other collateral appeal, even if facing execution. One federal court has held that a state court must appoint counsel upon imposition of probation, regardless of whether a separate suspended sentence of incarceration is also imposed and regardless of whether counsel is provided for any subsequent probation revocation proceeding, while others have held or suggested that if probation is imposed without counsel, then a person may not be subsequently jailed for violation of that probation. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Tortious interference, also known as intentional interference with contractual relations, in the common law of torts, occurs when one person intentionally damages someone else's contractual or business relationships with a third party, causing economic harm. As an example, someone could use blackmail to induce a contractor into breaking a contract; they could threaten a supplier to prevent them from supplying goods or services to another party; or they could obstruct someone's ability to honor a contract with a client by deliberately refusing to deliver necessary goods. A tort of negligent interference occurs when one party's negligence damages the contractual or business relationship between others, causing economic harm, such as, by blocking a waterway or causing a blackout that prevents the utility company from being able to uphold its existing contracts with consumers. Description. Tortious interference with contract rights. Tortious interference with contract rights can occur when one party persuades another to breach its contract with a third party (for example, using blackmail, threats, influence, etcetera) or where someone knowingly interferes with a contractor's ability to perform his contractual obligations, preventing the client from receiving the services or goods promised (for example, by refusing to deliver goods). The tortfeasor is the person who interferes with the contractual relationship between others. When a tortfeasor is aware of an existing contract and deliberately induces a breach by one of the contract holders, it is termed "tortious inducement of breach of contract." Tortious interference with a business relationship. Tortious interference with business relationships occurs where the tortfeasor intentionally acts to prevent someone from successfully establishing or maintaining business relationships with others. This tort may occur when one party knowingly takes an action that causes a second party not to enter into a business relationship with a third party that otherwise would probably have occurred. An example is when a tortfeasor offers to sell a property to someone below market value knowing they were in the final stages of a sale with a third party pending the upcoming settlement date to formalize the sale writing. Such conduct is termed "tortious interference with a business expectancy". --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

A flat tax (short for flat-rate tax) is a tax with a single rate on the taxable amount, after accounting for any deductions or exemptions from the tax base. It is not necessarily a fully proportional tax. Implementations are often progressive due to exemptions, or regressive in case of a maximum taxable amount. There are various tax systems that are labeled "flat tax" even though they are significantly different. The defining characteristic is the existence of only one tax rate other than zero, as opposed to multiple non-zero rates that vary depending on the amount subject to taxation. A flat tax system is usually discussed in the context of an income tax, where progressivity is common, but it may also apply to taxes on consumption, property or transfers. Major categories. Flat tax proposals differ in how the subject of the tax is defined. True flat-rate income tax. A true flat-rate tax is a system of taxation where one tax rate is applied to all personal income with no deductions. Marginal flat tax. Where deductions are allowed, a 'flat tax' is a progressive tax with the special characteristic that, above the maximum deduction, the marginal rate on all further income is constant. Such a tax is said to be marginally flat above that point. The difference between a true flat tax and a marginally flat tax can be reconciled by recognizing that the latter simply excludes certain types of income from being defined as taxable income; hence, both kinds of tax are flat on taxable income. Flat tax with limited deductions. Modified flat taxes have been proposed which would allow deductions for a very few items, while still eliminating the vast majority of existing deductions. Charitable deductions and home mortgage interest are the most discussed examples of deductions that would be retained, as these deductions are popular with voters and are often used. Another common theme is a single, large, fixed deduction. This large fixed deduction would compensate for the elimination of various existing deductions and would simplify taxes, having the side-effect that many (mostly low income) households will not have to file tax returns. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

In law, fraud is intentional deception to secure unfair or unlawful gain, or to deprive a victim of a legal right. Fraud can violate civil law (for example, a fraud victim may sue the fraud perpetrator to avoid the fraud or recover monetary compensation) or criminal law (for example, a fraud perpetrator may be prosecuted and imprisoned by governmental authorities), or it may cause no loss of money, property, or legal right but still be an element of another civil or criminal wrong. The purpose of fraud may be monetary gain or other benefits, for example by obtaining a passport, travel document, or driver's license, or mortgage fraud, where the perpetrator may attempt to qualify for a mortgage by way of false statements. A hoax is a distinct concept that involves deliberate deception without the intention of gain or of materially damaging or depriving a victim. As a civil wrong. In common law jurisdictions, as a civil wrong, fraud is a tort. While the precise definitions and requirements of proof vary among jurisdictions, the requisite elements of fraud as a tort generally are the intentional misrepresentation or concealment of an important fact upon which the victim is meant to rely, and in fact does rely, to the harm of the victim. Proving fraud in a court of law is often said to be difficult as the intention to defraud is the key element in question. As such, proving fraud comes with a "greater evidentiary burden than other civil claims." This difficulty is exacerbated by the fact that some jurisdictions require the victim to prove fraud by clear and convincing evidence. The remedies for fraud may include rescission (for example, reversal) of a fraudulently obtained agreement or transaction, the recovery of a monetary award to compensate for the harm caused, punitive damages to punish or deter the misconduct, and possibly others. In cases of a fraudulently induced contract, fraud may serve as a defense in a civil action for breach of contract or specific performance of contract. Similarly, fraud may serve as a basis for a court to invoke its equitable jurisdiction. As a criminal offense. In common law jurisdictions, as a criminal offense, fraud takes many different forms, some general (for example, theft by false pretense) and some specific to particular categories of victims or misconduct (for example, bank fraud, insurance fraud, forgery). The elements of fraud as a crime similarly vary. The requisite elements of perhaps the most general form of criminal fraud, theft by false pretense, are the intentional deception of a victim by false representation or pretense with the intent of persuading the victim to part with property and with the victim parting with property in reliance on the representation or pretense and with the perpetrator intending to keep the property from the victim. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Land value taxation (for example, property tax applied only to the unimproved value of land) has a long history in the United States dating back from Physiocratic influence on Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin. It is most famously associated with Henry George and his book Progress and Poverty (1879), which argued that because the supply of land is fixed and its location value is created by communities and public works, the economic rent of land is the most logical source of public revenue. and which had considerable impact on turn-of-the-century reform movements in America and elsewhere. Every single state in the United States has some form of property tax on real estate and hence, in part, a tax on land value. However, Pennsylvania in particular has seen local attempts to rely more heavily on the taxation of land value. History. Physiocratic influence in the United States came by Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson as Ambassadors to France. Jefferson also brought his friend Pierre du Pont to the United States to promote the idea. A statement in the 36th Federalist Paper reflects that influence, "A small land tax will answer the purpose of the States, and will be their most simple and most fit resource." Henry George. Henry George (September 2, 1839 – October 29, 1897) was perhaps the most famous advocate of land rents. As an American political economist, he advocated for a "Single Tax" on land that would eliminate the need for all other taxes. In 1879 he authored Progress and Poverty, which significantly influenced land taxation in the United States. Legality. There are two potential legal obstacles unique to land value taxation in the United States: uniformity clauses and Dillon's Rule. At the federal level, land value taxation is legal so long as it is apportioned among the states. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Insurance bad faith is a tort unique to the law of the United States (but with parallels elsewhere, particularly Canada) that an insurance company commits by violating the "implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing" which automatically exists by operation of law in every insurance contract. In common law countries such as Australia and the UK, the issue is usually framed in the context of a failure of the duty of utmost good faith originating in English insurance law, which does not constitute a tort but rather provides the insured a contractual remedy unique to insurance law. If an insurance company violates the implied covenant, the insured person (or "policyholder") may sue the company on a tort claim in addition to a standard breach of contract claim. The contract-tort distinction is significant because as a matter of public policy, punitive or exemplary damages are unavailable for contract claims, but are available for tort claims. In addition, consequential damages for breach of contract are traditionally subject to certain constraints not applicable to compensatory damages in tort actions. The result is that a plaintiff in an insurance bad faith case may be able to recover an amount larger than the original face value of the policy, if the insurance company's conduct was particularly egregious. Historical background. Most laws regulating the insurance industry in the United States are state-specific. In 1869, the Supreme Court of the United States held, in Paul v Virginia (1869), that the United States Congress did not have the authority to regulate insurance under its power to regulate commerce. In the 1930s and 1940s, a number of U.S. Supreme Court decisions broadened the interpretation of the Commerce Clause in various ways, which led the U.S. Supreme Court to hold that federal jurisdiction over interstate commerce did extend to insurance in United States v South-Eastern Underwriters Association (1944). In March 1945, the United States Congress expressly reaffirmed its support for state-based insurance regulation by passing the McCarran–Ferguson Act which held that no law that Congress passed should be construed to invalidate, impair or supersede any law enacted by a state regarding insurance. As a result, nearly all regulation of insurance continues to take place at the state level. Such regulation generally comes in two forms. First, each state has an "insurance code" or some similarly named statute which attempts to provide comprehensive regulation of the insurance industry and of insurance policies, a specialized type of contract. State insurance codes generally mandate specific procedural requirements for starting, financing, operating, and winding down insurance companies, and often require insurers to be overcapitalized (relative to other companies in the larger financial services sector) to ensure that they have enough funds to pay claims if the state is hit by multiple natural and man-made disasters at the same time. There is usually a department of insurance or division of insurance responsible for implementing the state insurance code and enforcing its provisions in administrative proceedings against insurers. Second, judicial interpretation of insurance contracts in disputes between policyholders and insurers takes place in the context of the aforementioned insurance-specific statutes as well as general contract law; the latter still exists only in the form of judge-made case law in most states. A few states like California and Georgia have gone farther and attempted to codify all of their contract law (not just insurance law) into statutory law. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

The United States federal state and local tax (SALT) deduction is an itemized deduction that allows taxpayers to deduct certain taxes paid to state and local governments from their adjusted gross income. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 put a $10,000 cap on the SALT deduction for the years 2018–2025. The SALT deduction reduces the cost of state and local taxes to taxpayers. It disproportionately benefits wealthy and high-earning taxpayers in areas with high state and local taxes. The Tax Policy Center estimated in 2016 that fully eliminating the SALT deduction would increase federal revenue by nearly $1.3 trillion over 10 years. Definition. For United States Federal Income Tax purposes, state and local taxes are defined in section 170(a) of the Internal Revenue Code as taxes paid to states and localities in the forms of: (1) real property taxes; (2) personal property taxes; (3) income, war profits, and excess profits taxes; and (4) general sales taxes. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 capped the use of this itemized deduction at $10,000 ($5,000 for married persons who file separately). Effects. Tax savings from the SALT deduction flow disproportionately to those with high incomes. According to the Joint Committee on Taxation, in 2014 88% of the benefit of the SALT deduction accrued to those with incomes above $100,000 and only 1% accrued to those making less than $50,000. The SALT deduction primarily benefits those in high-tax states, which tend to be those with consistent Democratic legislative majorities. In 2016, the ten counties with the largest SALT deductions per filer (on average) were in New York, California, Connecticut and New Jersey. These ten counties are in the New York metropolitan area and San Francisco Bay Area, which have high concentrations of wealth and expensive real estate. Since the deduction was capped at $10,000 in 2017, many homeowners have been unable to deduct thousands of dollars that they previously could, beyond what they pay in property taxes, to state, county and local governments in these places. In 2017, only taxpayers in New York, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and New Jersey (the states with the first, second, third, and ninth highest GDP per capita) on average sent more than $1,000 each to the federal government above what the state received per capita. Capping the SALT deduction tends to increase this balance of payments deficit. Economic modeling by the economists Gilbert E. Metcalf and Martin Feldstein suggests that eliminating the SALT deduction would have "little if any impact on state and local spending". The economist Edward Gramlich has likewise concluded that eliminating the deduction would have little effect on state and local spending; he also finds that eliminating the deduction would likely not induce many high-income taxpayers to leave low-income communities. A use tax is a type of tax levied in the United States by numerous state governments. It is essentially the same as a sales tax but is applied not where a product or service was sold but where a merchant bought a product or service and then converted it for its own use, without having paid tax when it was initially purchased. Use taxes are functionally equivalent to sales taxes. They are typically levied upon the use, storage, enjoyment, or other consumption in the state of tangible personal property that has not been subjected to a sales tax. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Restraints of trade is a common law doctrine relating to the enforceability of contractual restrictions on freedom to conduct business. It is a precursor of modern competition law. In an old leading case of Mitchel v Reynolds (1711) Lord Smith LC said, It is the privilege of a trader in a free country, in all matters not contrary to law, to regulate his own mode of carrying it on according to his own discretion and choice. If the law has regulated or restrained his mode of doing this, the law must be obeyed. But no power short of the general law ought to restrain his free discretion. A contractual undertaking not to trade is void and unenforceable against the promisor as contrary to the public policy of promoting trade, unless the restraint of trade is reasonable to protect the interest of the purchaser of a business. Restraints of trade can also appear in post-termination restrictive covenants in employment contracts. United States. In the US, the first significant discussion occurred in the Sixth Circuit's opinion by Chief Judge (later US President and still later Supreme Court Chief Justice) William Howard Taft in United States v Addyston Pipe & Steel Company Judge Taft explained the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 as a statutory codification of the English common-law doctrine of restraint of trade, as explicated in such cases as Mitchel v Reynolds. The court distinguished between naked restraints of trade and those ancillary to the legitimate main purpose of a lawful contract and reasonably necessary to effectuation of that purpose. An example of the latter would be a non-competition clause associated with the lease or sale of a bakeshop, as in the Mitchel case. Such a contract should be tested by a "rule of reason," meaning that it should be deemed legitimate if "necessary and ancillary." An example of the naked type of restraint would be the price-fixing and bid-allocation agreements involved in the Addyston case. Taft said that "we do not think there is any question of reasonableness open to the courts to such a contract." The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment. During the following century, the Addyston Pipe opinion of Judge Taft has remained foundational in antitrust analysis. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Internet transactions. Through the Internet's history, purchases made over the Internet within the United States have generally been exempt from sales tax, as courts have followed the Supreme Court ruling from Quill Corporation v North Dakota (1992) that a state may only collect sales tax from a business selling products over the Internet if that entity has a physical location in the state. This decision was based on the Dormant Commerce Clause that prevents states from interfering in interstate commerce, unless granted that authority by Congress. Some retailers, like Amazon.com, had voluntarily started collecting sales tax on purchases even from states where they do not have a physical presence. Many states also have a line item on their tax returns allowing the payment of state sales tax when state income tax is filed by an individual or corporation. In May 2013, the Senate passed the Marketplace Fairness Act, which would allow states to collect sales taxes for purchases made online. The legislation would give States the tools to collect sales taxes on cross-State sales transactions. The bill received support from retailers including Walmart and Amazon.com, who have claimed that it is unfair not to require online merchants to collect sales taxes. Groups like the National Retail Federation and the Retail Industry Leaders Association have said that requiring online vendors to collect sales taxes will help make brick and mortar retailers more competitive. However, U.S. House Speaker John Boehner stated that it would be difficult to implement such a system due to varying tax codes in different states. The National Taxpayers Union (NTU) spoke out against the bill, along with The Heritage Foundation, which indicated that it would harm Internet commerce and small businesses. Online retailer eBay believes it will hurt some of its sellers and lobbied Congress to exempt businesses that have less than $10 million in out-of-state sales or fewer than 50 employees. The Act failed to pass in either the 112th or 113th Congress. In October 2017, the state of South Dakota petitioned the Supreme Court to abrogate the Quill decision, citing the ease that online retailers can now determine the location and appropriate sales tax for purchases compared to the state of the Internet in 1992. Several online retailers, including Wayfair, Overstock.com and Newegg, submitted petitions in opposition to South Dakota, stating that the impact will be difficult on small and medium-sized retailers that would not have ease of access to these tools. In January 2018, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case South Dakota v Wayfair Incorporated in its 2018 term. Oral arguments were heard by the Supreme Court on April 17, 2018. During oral arguments South Dakota's attorney general, Marty Jackley, and the U.S. Solicitor General's representative, Malcolm L Stewart, both posited that if the Court overturns the Quill decision that the ruling must be retroactive and not merely prospective. Several Justices were concerned about the burden that back taxes and ongoing sales and use tax compliance would place on small businesses. On June 21, 2018 the Supreme Court held that states may charge tax on purchases made from out-of-state sellers, even if the seller does not have a physical presence in the taxing state. The court's 5–4 majority decision overturned Quill, ruling that the physical presence rule decided by Quill was 'unsound and incorrect' in the current age of Internet services. Value added tax. There is no value added tax in the United States. There have been proposals to replace some Federal taxes with a value added tax. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Insurance bad faith is a tort unique to the law of the United States (but with parallels elsewhere, particularly Canada) that an insurance company commits by violating the "implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing" which automatically exists by operation of law in every insurance contract. In common law countries such as Australia and the UK, the issue is usually framed in the context of a failure of the duty of utmost good faith originating in English insurance law, which does not constitute a tort but rather provides the insured a contractual remedy unique to insurance law. If an insurance company violates the implied covenant, the insured person (or "policyholder") may sue the company on a tort claim in addition to a standard breach of contract claim. The contract-tort distinction is significant because as a matter of public policy, punitive or exemplary damages are unavailable for contract claims, but are available for tort claims. In addition, consequential damages for breach of contract are traditionally subject to certain constraints not applicable to compensatory damages in tort actions. The result is that a plaintiff in an insurance bad faith case may be able to recover an amount larger than the original face value of the policy, if the insurance company's conduct was particularly egregious. Historical background. Most laws regulating the insurance industry in the United States are state-specific. In 1869, the Supreme Court of the United States held, in Paul v Virginia (1869), that the United States Congress did not have the authority to regulate insurance under its power to regulate commerce. In the 1930s and 1940s, a number of U.S. Supreme Court decisions broadened the interpretation of the Commerce Clause in various ways, which led the U.S. Supreme Court held that federal jurisdiction over interstate commerce did extend to insurance in United States v South-Eastern Underwriters Ass'n (1944). In March 1945, the United States Congress expressly reaffirmed its support for state-based insurance regulation by passing the McCarran–Ferguson Act which held that no law that Congress passed should be construed to invalidate, impair or supersede any law enacted by a state regarding insurance. As a result, nearly all regulation of insurance continues to take place at the state level. Such regulation generally comes in two forms. First, each state has an "insurance code" or some similarly named statute which attempts to provide comprehensive regulation of the insurance industry and of insurance policies, a specialized type of contract. State insurance codes generally mandate specific procedural requirements for starting, financing, operating, and winding down insurance companies, and often require insurers to be overcapitalized (relative to other companies in the larger financial services sector) to ensure that they have enough funds to pay claims if the state is hit by multiple natural and man-made disasters at the same time. There is usually a department of insurance or division of insurance responsible for implementing the state insurance code and enforcing its provisions in administrative proceedings against insurers. Second, judicial interpretation of insurance contracts in disputes between policyholders and insurers takes place in the context of the aforementioned insurance-specific statutes as well as general contract law; the latter still exists only in the form of judge-made case law in most states. A few states like California and Georgia have gone farther and attempted to codify all of their contract law (not just insurance law) into statutory law. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Missouri imposes a sales tax upon all sales of tangible personal property, as well as some "taxable services"; it also charges a use tax for the "privilege of storing, using or consuming within this state any article of tangible personal property." The state rate, including conservation and other taxes, is 4.225%, and counties, municipalities, and other political subdivisions charge their own taxes. Those additional local taxes combined with "community improvement district," "transportation development district," and "museum district" taxes can result in merchandise sales taxes in excess of 10%. The state sales tax rate on certain foods is 1.225%. Missouri provides several exemptions from sales tax, such as purchases by charitable organizations or some common carriers (as opposed to "contract carriers"). Missouri also excludes some purchases from taxation on the grounds that such sales are not sales at retail; these include sales to political subdivisions. The Supreme Court of Missouri in August, 2009, ruled that when a sale is excluded from taxation – as opposed to exempt from taxation – the seller must self-acquire sales tax on its purchase of the goods and remit the tax on such purchases it made. This decision was reversed by two similar – but not identical – statutes added during the 2010 general assembly's regular session. Although the purchaser is obligated to pay the tax, the seller is obligated to remit the tax, and when the seller fails to remit, the obligation to pay falls on them. As compensation for collecting and remitting taxes, and as an incentive to timely remit taxes, sellers may keep two percent of all taxes collected each period. There are two exceptions to the general rule that the seller must pay the sales tax when he or she fails to collect it. First, no sales tax is due upon the purchase of a motor vehicle that must be titled. Instead, the purchaser pays the tax directly to the Department of Revenue within one month of purchase. As long as the vehicle is taken out of state within that first month of purchase and titled elsewhere, no tax is due in Missouri. Second, if the purchaser presents an exemption certificate to the buyer at the time of sale, then the purchaser may be assessed taxes on the purchases if the certificate was issued in bad faith. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

In conflict of laws, the term lex loci (Latin for "the law of the place") is a shorthand version of the choice of law rules that determine the lex causae (the laws chosen to decide a case). General principles. When a case comes before a court, if the main features of the case (particularly the parties and the causes of action) are local, the court will then apply the lex fori, the prevailing municipal law, to decide the case. However, if there are "foreign" elements to the case, the court may then be obliged, under conflict of laws, to consider whether it has jurisdiction to hear the case (see forum shopping). The court must then characterise the issues to allocate the factual basis of the case to its relevant legal classes. The court may then be required to apply the choice of law rules to decide the lex causae, the law to be applied to each cause of action. Blackacre, Whiteacre, Greenacre, Brownacre, and variations are the placeholder names used for fictitious estates in land. The names are used by professors of law in common law jurisdictions, particularly in the area of real property and occasionally in contracts, to discuss the rights of various parties to a piece of land. A typical law school or bar exam question on real property might say: Adam, owner of a fee simple in Blackacre, conveyed the property "to Bill for life, remainder to Charles, provided that if any person should consume alcohol on the property before the first born son of Charles turns twenty-one, then the property shall go to Dwight in fee simple." Assume that neither Bill, Charles, nor Dwight is an heir of Adam, and that Adam's only heir is his son, Edward. Discuss the ownership interests in Blackacre of Adam, Bill, Charles, Dwight and Edward. Where more than one estate is needed to demonstrate a point – perhaps relating to a dispute over boundaries, easements or riparian rights – a second estate will usually be called Whiteacre, a third, Greenacre, and a fourth, Brownacre. A security deposit is a sum of money held in trust either as an initial part-payment in a purchasing process (often used to prevent the seller's selling an item to someone else during an agreed period of time while the buyer verifies the suitability of the item, or arranges finance), also known as an earnest payment, or else, in the course of a rental agreement to ensure the property owner against default by the tenant and for the cost of repair in relation to any damage explicitly specified in the lease and that did in fact occur. In certain taxation regimes a deposit need not be declared as a part of the gross income of the receiving party (person or corporation) until either the depositing party or an arbitrator agrees the funds may be used for the intended purpose. A security deposit is a sum of money held in trust either as an initial part-payment in a purchasing process (often used to prevent the seller's selling an item to someone else during an agreed period of time while the buyer verifies the suitability of the item, or arranges finance), also known as an earnest payment, or else, in the course of a rental agreement to ensure the property owner against default by the tenant and for the cost of repair in relation to any damage explicitly specified in the lease and that did in fact occur. In certain taxation regimes a deposit need not be declared as a part of the gross income of the receiving party (person or corporation) until either the depositing party or an arbitrator agrees the funds may be used for the intended purpose. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

The Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH) is an intergovernmental organization in the area of private international law (also known as conflict of laws), that administers several international conventions, protocols and soft law instruments. The Hague Conference was first convened by Tobias Asser in 1893 in The Hague. In 1911, Asser received the Nobel Prize for Peace for his work in the field of private international law, and in particular for his achievements with respect to the HCCH. After World War II, the Hague Conference was established as an international organization. History. A permanent diplomatic conference. On the initiative of Tobias Asser, the First Diplomatic Session of the HCCH was convened in 1893. Its aim was, and remains, to "work for the progressive unification of the rules of private international law", including by creating, and assisting in the implementation of, multilateral conventions that promote the harmonization of the rules and principles of private international law (or conflict of laws). The First to Fourth Diplomatic Session of the HCCH took place in 1893, 1894, 1900 and 1904 respectively. They resulted in a number of multilateral treaties, the Hague Conventions, that unified the rules of private international law in the areas of Marriage (1902), Divorce (1902), Guardianship (1902), Civil procedure (1905), Effects of Marriage (1905), and Deprivation of Civil Rights (1905). After World War I, the Fifth and Sixth Diplomatic Sessions took place in 1925 and 1928 respectively. The result of those Diplomatic Sessions was the Protocol to recognize the competence of the Permanent Court of International Justice to interpret the Hague Conventions on Private International Law. Intergovernmental organization. After World War II, steps were taken to establish the HCCH as an intergovernmental organization, governed by its member states and administered by a secretariat, the Permanent Bureau. The treaty establishing the HCCH, the "Statute of the Hague Conference on Private International Law", was adopted during the Seventh Diplomatic Session of the HCCH in 1951, and entered into force on 15 July 1955. The acronym "HCCH" is derived from using the respective capitals of the phrases "Hague Conference" and "Conférence de La Haye". It represents the bilingual nature of the HCCH, which has both English and French as its working languages. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Tax resistance in the United States has been practiced at least since colonial times, and has played important parts in American history. Tax resistance is the refusal to pay a tax, usually by means that bypass established legal norms, as a means of protest, nonviolent resistance, or conscientious objection. It was a core tactic of the American Revolution and has played a role in many struggles in America from colonial times to the present day. In addition, the philosophy of tax resistance, from the "no taxation without representation" axiom that served as a foundation of the Revolution to the assertion of individual conscience in Henry David Thoreau's Civil Disobedience, has been an important plank of American political philosophy. Theory. The theory that there should be "no taxation without representation," while it did not originate in America, is often associated with the American Revolution, in which that slogan did strong duty. It continues to be a rallying cry for tax rebellions today. American Henry David Thoreau's theory of civil disobedience has proven to be extremely influential, and its influence today is not limited to tax resistance stands and campaigns but to all manner of refusal to obey unjust laws. These are among the theories of tax resistance that have taken on a particularly American flavor and have animated and inspired American tax resisters and tax resistance campaigns. No taxation without representation. In English political philosophy of the late 18th century, the theory was prominent that in order for the sovereign to exact a tax on a population, that population must be represented in a legislature that had the sole power to levy the tax. That theory was made axiomatic in the form of the slogan "no taxation without representation" (and similar expressions). As the American colonies did not have representation in the British parliament, this axiom became a useful platform for colonial rebels to justify their rebellion against direct taxes imposed by the Crown. The "no taxation without representation" slogan was later brought to bear in the arguments for tax resistance by African-Americans  and women, as they did not have the right to vote or serve in the legislature. It is used today by the District of Columbia as part of a complaint that residents of the district have no voting Congressional representatives. The phrase has such potent currency in American thought that it is frequently used today in the context of tax debates that have little to do with legislative representation, at least in the way that the original coiners of the phrase would have understood: For example, complaints that Congressional representatives only represent certain special interests, or that the complainer doesn't feel that his or her point of view is represented in legislative debates or actions. Civil disobedience. Henry David Thoreau's 1849 essay On Resistance to Civil Government — now usually referred to as Civil Disobedience — is part of the canon of American political philosophy. It was prompted by Thoreau's refusal to pay a poll tax because of unwillingness to support a government that was enforcing the slavery of Americans and what he felt was an unjust war against Mexico. Thoreau argued that obedience to government is often misplaced, and that people should develop and trust their own consciences rather than use the law as a crutch. Thoreau's philosophy has inspired many tax resisters since, especially those who have acted individually (not as part of a tax strike or other large-scale movement) and from motives of conscientious objection. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

In tort law, detinue is an action to recover for the wrongful taking of personal property. It is initiated by an individual who claims to have a greater right to their immediate possession than the current possessor. For an action in detinue to succeed, a claimant must first prove that he had better right to possession of the chattel than the defendant and second that the defendant refused to return the chattel once demanded by the claimant. Detinue allows for a remedy of damages for the value of the chattel, but unlike most other interference torts, detinue also allows for the recovery of the specific chattel being withheld. History. Historically, detinue came in two forms: "detinue sur bailment" and "detinue sur trover". In detinue sur bailment, the defendant is in a bailment relationship with the claimant and either refuses to return the chattel or else has negligently or intentionally lost or destroyed it. The onus is on the bailee to prove that the loss of the chattel was not his or her fault. In detinue sur trover, the defendant can be any individual in possession of the chattel who refuses to return it to the claimant. A defendant could be a finder or a thief or any innocent third party, and the claimant need only have a better right to possession. Early writs and forms of action were exceptionally narrow in scope. This is reflective of the basic conservatism of the common law courts in the middle and late medieval period. This was in contrast with the courts of equity which were creative in producing novel writs for many new fact situations. Compensation in those days was usually not in money, which was rare, but in land, livestock, or furnishings, as these were the typical measures of wealth. What the plaintiff wanted back was the land, cattle or even coins lent. Maitland suggests that in the earliest time the writ of debt seems almost to have been designed to recover identical coins. The early writ of detinue was specifically designed for recovery of a chattel wrongfully detained, but not an action to recover loss due to a chattel being harmed while the defendant had it. Two facts marked the early common law actions. They were defective because of the wide field which was excluded. They were also defective because the plaintiff might well think himself entitled to a remedy, but by reason of the procedure found that he went away empty. The defendant to a writ of debt or detinue might bring others with him who would swear that his denial of the claim was true. This was technically called his "wage of law" or "wager of law". It was enough to dispose of the plaintiff's claim. A common way to escape all writs, even the writ of right, as well as debt and detinue was to claim sickness. If the jury found him in bed with his boots off, the custom was to delay the writ for a year and a day. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

A gift tax is a tax imposed on the transfer of ownership of property during the giver's life. The United States Internal Revenue Service says that a gift is "Any transfer to an individual, either directly or indirectly, where full compensation (measured in money or money's worth) is not received in return." When a taxable gift in the form of cash, stocks, real estate, or other tangible or intangible property is made, the tax is usually imposed on the donor (the giver) unless there is a retention of an interest which delays completion of the gift. A transfer is "completely gratuitous" when the donor receives nothing of value in exchange for the given property. A transfer is "gratuitous in part" when the donor receives some value but the value of the property received by the donor is substantially less than the value of the property given by the donor. In this case, the amount of the gift is the difference. In the United States, the gift tax is governed by Chapter 12, Subtitle B of the Internal Revenue Code. The tax is imposed by section 2501 of the Code. For the purposes of taxable income, courts have defined a "gift" as the proceeds from a "detached and disinterested generosity." Gifts are often given out of "affection, respect, admiration, charity or like impulses." Generally, if an interest in property is transferred during the giver's lifetime (often called an inter vivos gift), then the gift or transfer would not be subject to the estate tax. In 1976, Congress unified the gift and estate tax regimes, thereby limiting the giver's ability to circumvent the estate tax by giving during his or her lifetime. Some differences between estate and gift taxes remain, such as the effective tax rate, the amount of the credit available against tax, and the basis of the received property. There are also types of gifts which will be included in a person's estate, such as certain gifts made within the three-year window before death and gifts in which the donor retains an interest such as gifts of remainder interests that are not either qualified remainder trusts or charitable remainder trusts. The remainder interest gift tax rules impose the tax on the transfer of the entire value of the trust by assigning a zero value to the interest retained by the donor. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Felony - A crime carrying a penalty of more than a year in prison.  A felony is traditionally considered a crime of high seriousness, whereas a misdemeanor is regarded as less serious. The term "felony" originated from English common law (From the French medieval word "félonie") to describe an offense that resulted in the confiscation of a convicted person's land and goods, to which additional punishments including capital punishment could be added; other crimes were called misdemeanors. Following conviction of a felony in a court of law, a person may be described as a felon or a convicted felon.  --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

United States v Texas was United States Supreme Court case that involved the Texas Heartbeat Act (also known as Senate Bill 8 or SB8), a state law that bans abortion once a fetal heartbeat is detected, typically six weeks into pregnancy. A unique feature of the Act, and challenges to it, is the delegation of enforcement to any and all private individuals who are authorized by the Act to file civil actions against abortion providers who violate it, and aiders and abetters, while state and local officials are prohibited from doing so. The Act is stated by its opponents to go against the landmark 1973 Supreme Court decision Roe v Wade, which bans states from regulating abortions during the first trimester of pregnancy in favor of the woman's right to privacy guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. As one of several challenges to the law, the Supreme Court within United States v Texas will consider and decide whether the federal government has standing and the right to sue Texas for injunctive and declaratory relief to stop enforcement of the Act through private civil litigation in the Texas judicial system. The case was fast-tracked by the Court and heard on November 1, 2021, alongside Whole Woman's Health v Jackson, which was brought by abortion providers and allies as a pre-enforcement challenge to the constitutionality of the Texas Heartbeat Act under the U.S. constitution. The Supreme Court ruled in a per curiam decision in December 2021 that the writ of certiorari was improvidently granted and dismissed the case. Background. Texas passed the Texas Heartbeat Act in May 2021, with the bill to go into effect on September 1, 2021. One of several heartbeat bills in the country, Texas's bill banned abortion once "cardiac activity" in an embryo can be detected, typically after six weeks of pregnancy. Because of the potential conflict with the Supreme Court's ruling in Roe v Wade in that states could not regulate abortions during the first trimester (three months) of pregnancy in the interest of the right of privacy for women, the Texas Heartbeat Act does not allow the state to enforce the ban, but instead gives power to any interested party to sue anyone that performs an illegal abortion or supports that, and seek statutory damages of at least $10,000 in courts. District Court. On September 6, 2021, United States Attorney General Merrick Garland announced that the Justice Department (DOJ) will protect abortion seekers under the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act. On September 8, 2021, The Wall Street Journal reported that the Biden administration plans to sue Texas on the basis that the Act "illegally interferes with federal interests". --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Trespass is an area of criminal law or tort law broadly divided into three groups: trespass to the person, trespass to chattels, and trespass to land. Trespass to the person historically involved six separate trespasses: threats, assault, battery, wounding, mayhem (or maiming), and false imprisonment. Through the evolution of the common law in various jurisdictions, and the codification of common law torts, most jurisdictions now broadly recognize three trespasses to the person: assault, which is "any act of such a nature as to excite an apprehension of battery"; battery, "any intentional and unpermitted contact with the plaintiff's person or anything attached to it and practically identified with it"; and false imprisonment, the "unlaw obstruct or deprive of freedom from restraint of movement". One can retrieve wounded or expired game from neighboring properties and boundaries even if the neighboring landowner does not give permission as long as there are no weapons in possession while retrieving game causes injury". Trespass to chattel does not require a showing of damages. Simply the "intermeddling with or use of … the personal property" of another gives cause of action for trespass. Since CompuServe Incorporated v Cyber Promotions, Inc., various courts have applied the principles of trespass to chattel to resolve cases involving unsolicited bulk e-mail and unauthorized server usage. Trespass to land is today the tort most commonly associated with the term trespass; it takes the form of "wrongful interference with one's possessory rights in  property". Generally, it is not necessary to prove harm to a possessor's legally protected interest; liability for unintentional trespass varies by jurisdiction. "in common law, every unauthorized entry upon the soil of another was a trespasser"; however, under the tort scheme established by the Restatement of Torts, liability for unintentional intrusions arises only under circumstances evincing negligence or where the intrusion involved a highly dangerous activity. Trespass has also been treated as a common law offense in some countries. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support